WHO admits to developing genocide vaccines

The UN defines “Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group” as genocide. Genocide was codified as an independent crime in the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (the Genocide Convention). The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has repeatedly stated that the Convention embodies principles that are part of general customary international law. This means that whether or not States have ratified the Genocide Convention, they are all bound as a matter of law by the principle that genocide is a crime prohibited under international law. The ICJ has also stated that the prohibition of genocide is a peremptory norm of international law (or ius cogens) and consequently, no derogation from it is allowed.

Genocide is what the UN and WHO has been committing with funding provided by Bill Gates. In 2010 Bill and Melinda Gates invested $10 billion over 10 years to help research, develop and deliver WHO’s vaccines for the world’s poorest countries. Source: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2010/01/Bill-and-Melinda-Gates-Pledge-$10-Billion-in-Call-for-Decade-of-Vaccines

How is the WHO / UN committing genocide? “the WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation has been supporting basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines … The Task Force convened a meeting in 1974 to select criteria for tissues and molecules capable of mounting antifertility responses.” The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. Its formation, objectives and research activities

Birth control is a means / measure intended to prevent births. The WHO publicly stated, admitted, that it “has been supporting basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines“. Vaccines intended to prevent births. The WHO showed intent to commit genocide when they “tested (birth control / genocide vaccine) in a phase I clinical trial in 1986-1988“.

Deliberate vaccination to control fertility differs from that to control disease. The intent of providing a fertility-regulating vaccine is to prevent pregnancy and birth. The WHO / UN and Bill Gates subscribe to the following logic: “the global environmental crisis is due to over-population which necessitates population control programs; thus pregnancy can be considered a disease subject to state control.”

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.” Bill Gates

Evidence has already been presented that the WHO (an agency of the UN) has been “covertly” using birth control / genocide vaccines against the World’s black population. WHO’s Kenya tetanus vaccines were tested by 6 accredited laboratories and they found hCG – a hormone that would produce antibodies against hCG to prevent pregnancy / birth. The Kenya vaccine programme was promoted by the WHO and the Kenyan government and funded by the Gates Foundation.

“In 1993, WHO announced a “birth-control vaccine” for “family planning”. Published research shows that by 1976 WHO researchers had conjugated tetanus toxoid (TT) with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) producing a “birth-control” vaccine. Conjugating TT with hCG causes pregnancy hormones to be attacked by the immune system. Expected results are abortions in females already pregnant and/or infertility in recipients not yet impregnated. Repeated inoculations prolong infertility. Currently WHO researchers are working on more potent anti-fertility vaccines using recombinant DNA. WHO publications show a long-range purpose to reduce population growth in unstable “less developed countries”. By November 1993 Catholic publications appeared saying an abortifacient vaccine was being used as a tetanus prophylactic. In November 2014, the Catholic Church asserted that such a program was underway in Kenya. Three independent Nairobi accredited biochemistry laboratories tested samples from vials of the WHO tetanus vaccine being used in March 2014 and found hCG where none should be present. In October 2014, 6 additional vials were obtained by Catholic doctors and were tested in 6 accredited laboratories. Again, hCG was found in half the samples. Subsequently, Nairobi’s AgriQ Quest laboratory, in two sets of analyses, again found hCG in the same vaccine vials that tested positive earlier but found no hCG in 52 samples alleged by the WHO to be vials of the vaccine used in the Kenya campaign 40 with the same identifying batch numbers as the vials that tested positive for hCG.” https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=81838