Two year ban on foreigners buying homes in Canada imposed to conceal that Justin Trudeau caused home prices to rise

Justin Trudeau is solely responsible for the rise in home prices. Foreigners didn’t cause the rise in home prices. Home prices rose sharply as a result of the price of lumber being inflated to benefit Justin Trudeau personally.

Justin Trudeau caused the price of lumber to skyrocket during the 2021 federal election. Justin Trudeau “committed to building 1.4 million homes within four years by easing regulations on construction and eliminating some red tape.

“A re-elected Liberal government will build, preserve, or repair 1.4 million homes in the next four years” A Home. For Everyone: The Liberal Housing Plan

Justin Trudeau’s 2021 election campaign plans to build, preserve, or repair 1.4 million homes within four years caused the demand for lumber to exceed supply. It’s a fundamental economic principle that when demand exceeds supply, prices tend to rise.

Justin Trudeau has benefitted financially from the high prices of lumber. Justin Trudeau is currently listed/registered as a shareholder of 9190-0563 QUÉBEC INCPRODUCTION AND SALE OF FIREWOOD AND LUMBER.


Justin Trudeau continuing to be a shareholder of 9190-0563 QUÉBEC INC is defined by the federal law, the Conflict of Interest Act, as Prohibited activities.

“a public office holder (Justin Trudeau) is in a conflict of interest when he or she exercises an official power, duty or function that provides an opportunity to further his or her private interests or those of his or her relatives” DoJ

“When performing parliamentary duties & functions, a member shall not act in any way to further his or her private interests or those of a member of the member’s family” Parliament, CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS

Justin Trudeau’s broke the law by causing the price of lumber to be inflated for personal benefit/gain. Canadian law prohibits doing something to artificially affect the price of a publicly traded security in a co-ordinated way,

Justin Trudeau’s actions is defined as breach of trust by public officer.

Breach of trust by public officer

122 Every official who, in connection with the duties of their office, commits fraud or a breach of trust, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person, is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Actus Reus

The indictable offence of “breach of trust” can include “any breach of the appropriate standard of responsibility and conduct demanded of the accused by the nature of his office as a senior civil servant of the Crown.”

The prohibited act must cause a personal benefit to the accused and must be contrary to the duties imposed upon them.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login