Stephen Harper guilty of treachery – aiding and abetting US blockade, invasion & armed occupation of Canada
Corruption, World news Sunday, July 21st, 2013
In Canada, a person who aids or abets in the commission of a crime is treated the same as a principal offender under the criminal law. Section 21(1) of the Criminal Code . Treason is actually betraying one’s country by aiding and abetting another state.
Canadians have a right to know that their Prime Minister has been secretly negotiating with the United States to harm, impair and dissolve the sovereignty of Canada. Acts that offend the Queen’s Duty, Honor, and Country. Section 46-1c of the Canadian Criminal Code establishes the Prime Minister’s action as a criminal offense – high treason. Under C46 of the Criminal Code, a person commits “high treason” who “c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.” Is the United States our enemy? Is the US waging war against Canada? The answer to both is – Yes!
The US government officially declared war with Canada and every free nation on Earth when George W Bush declared “War on Terror“, before a special joint-session of Congress, following the US government’s false flag attacks on September 11, 2001. On Sept. 20, 2001 Bush gave “marching orders” to the US military and rallied support for a World “War on Terror” which eventually lead to the wars of aggression and occupations in Afghanistan and Iraq and US mercenary wars in Libya and Syria. The US government declared that America would “pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.” That is, for all intents and purposes, a declaration of a state of war against “Every nation in every region” including Canada.
Trade sanctions are acts of war – the blockade and seizure of goods by a belligerent. The US trade sanctions called NAFTA does exactly that. NAFTA blockades and seizes goods going into and coming out of Canada.
A blockade is an act of war by which a belligerent prevents access to or departure from a defined part of the enemy’s borders. A belligerent imposes trade sanctions just prior to invasion and occupation. Trade sanctions are instruments of warfare in that they are used to weaken the targeted country both politically and financially. Stephen Harper and Barack Obama officially declared war with a military blockade of Canada. In Washington, DC on Friday February 4, 2011 Harper removed Canada’s sovereignty. Harper secretively made a deal with the United States government and established a military blockade around Canada. The blockading state, the United States, made the blockade effective by declaring by notification that it will maintain armed forces all along Canada’s border in sufficient strength to prevent ingress or egress from Canada’s ports of entry.
This military blockade of Canada makes Stephen Harper a traitor. He is working secretively with a foreign government to dissolve the country we know as Canada. The secretive negotiations are being done without the involvement of our Parliament, or the people of Canada. It is an undemocratic betrayal of all of us. It is an illegal act of high treason.
Since Brian Mulroney there have been occasions in Canada where it has been appropriate to charge individuals with treason, but we have been reluctant and our national police force has been grossly negligent in their duties, to do so. Mulroney gave the sovereign power of Canada to the United States by passing the North American Free Trade Act. Mulroney knew what he had done amounted to treason and resigned on June 25, 1993, just two days after NAFTA was passed in Parliament by Mulroney’s Tory (Conservative) government. Mulroney betrayed Canada and its citizens when he handed control of trade and Canada’s natural resources over to a foreign state – the United States. Ever since the US has been freely and ruthlessly pillaging the labor, trade and natural resources of Canada.
Just 20 years later, another traitor, Stephen Harper is now willfully allowing for the United States government to infiltrate Canada’s security forces (both the Canadian police and Armed Forces). Harper is secretly engaging in traitorous acts against Canada and its people by “Harmonization, collaboration and information-sharing” with the United States Department of Homeland Security. In the war of 1812 Canadians and the First Nations people repulsed numerous American attempts to invade and annex Canada. Both Mulroney and Harper have allowed the United States (our known adversary and our enemy) to invade and annex Canada. Mulroney and Harper are traitors and deserve the severest punishment for their crimes.
Treason is a major crime no matter what country you live in. It is committed by individuals, motivated by ideological, religious, political or financial reasons. Those who commit treason have forsaken their loyalty to the sovereign power of the state of which they are citizens. They are prepared to betray their country and their fellow citizens. Since treason is a crime against the people as a whole, it has occupied a special category in the lexicon of crime. The severest penalty in the Criminal Code is usually reserved for traitors and the penalty is meant to serve as a symbol and warning to others that treason will not be tolerated.
The United States government has been involved in and assisted in the overthrow of foreign governments (more recently termed regime change) for decades, without the overt use of U.S. military force. Such operations are usually tasked to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Many of the governments targeted by the US have been democratically elected, rather than authoritarian governments or military dictatorships. In many cases the governments toppled were replaced by dictatorships, installed with assistance by the U.S. That is what the US did in Canada. The US government rigged the Canadian elections. There is evidence that the US government assassinated (assassination by induced cancer) NDP leader and 2011 federal election campaign favorite Jack Layton in order to install Stephen Harper as Prime Minister.
In 1975, during the US Church Committee hearings, the existence of a secret assassination weapon came to light. The CIA had developed a poison that caused the victim to have an immediate heart attack or be inflicted with cancer. This poison could be frozen into the shape of a dart and then fired at high speed from a pistol. The gun was capable of shooting the icy projectile with enough speed that the dart would go right through the clothes of the target and leave just a tiny red mark. Once in the body the poison would melt and be absorbed into the blood and cause a heart attack! The poison was developed to be undetectable by modern autopsy procedures. Only a very skilled pathologist, who knew exactly what to look for at an autopsy, could distinguish an assassination induced heart attack or cancer from the real thing.
Jack Ruby died of cancer a few weeks after his conviction for murder had been overruled in appeals court and he was ordered to stand trial outside of Dallas — thus allowing him to speak freely if he so desired. There was little hesitancy in Jack Ruby killing Lee Harvey Oswald in order to prevent him from talking, so there is no reason to suspect that any more consideration would have been shown Jack Ruby if he had posed a threat to people in the US government who had conspired to murder the president of the United States – John F Kennedy.
Matt Simmons, an oil industry expert, was assassinated for turning whistleblower over the Obama administration cover up of the BP Gulf Oil Spill. Investment banker Matt Simmons, who died suddenly, was an energy industry insider and presidential adviser whose profile soared when he wrote that Saudi Arabia is running out of oil and world production is peaking. Simmons, 67, died at his vacation home in Maine. An autopsy by the state medical examiner’s office concluded that he died from accidental drowning “with heart disease as a contributing factor.”
Former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic was also assassinated. He was found dead in the detention centre at The Hague tribunal. Mr Milosevic faced charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity for his alleged central role in the wars in Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo during the 1990s. He also faced genocide charges over the 1992-95 Bosnia war, in which 100,000 people died.
NATO’s Hague Tribunal was clearly a kangaroo court whose sole purpose was to convince ordinary people all over the world that NATO’s destruction of Yugoslavia was justified. Since NATO failed to show this in its own court (a total absence of evidence did make this difficult), there is indeed a powerful NATO motive to murder Milosevic – to prevent his acquittal. In this way, NATO can continue to claim that Milosevic was guilty, and nobody would begin to look into the mountain of evidence that showed that it was NATO leaders (particularly US president Bill Clinton) who committed war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in Yugoslavia.
So many people have been done in by cancer at a convenient time in history that it is now time to ask the question “who is assassinating people by giving their target cancer or inducing a massive heart attack”? Who ordered the hits and why?
Mr. Charles Senseney, a CIA weapon developer at Fort Detrick, Maryland, testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee in September 1975 where he described an umbrella poison dart gun he had made. He said it was always used in crowds with the umbrella open, firing through the webbing so it would not attract attention. Since it was silent, no one in the crowd could hear it and the assassin merely would fold up the umbrella and saunter away with the crowd. Video footage of the assassination of John F Kennedy shows this umbrella gun being used in Dealey Plaza. Video evidence of the events of November 22, 1963 shows that the first shot fired on the fateful day had always seemed to have had a paralytic effect on Kennedy. His fists were clenched and his head, shoulders and arms seemed to stiffen. An autopsy revealed that there was a small entrance wound in his neck but no evidence of a bullet path through his neck and no bullet was ever recovered that matched that small size.
For over 50 years assassinations have been carried out so skillfully as to leave the impression that the victims died from natural causes. Details of some of the techniques used to achieve this were brought to light in 1961 when professional KGB assassin Bogdan Stashinskiy defected to the West and revealed that he had successfully performed two such missions. In 1957 he killed Ukrainian emigré writer Lev Rebet in Munich with a poison vapor gun which left the victim dead of an apparent heart attack. In 1959, the same type of weapon was used on Ukrainian emigré leader Stepan Bandera, although Bandera’s death was never fully accepted as having been from natural causes.
Among the witnesses, important people and conspirators who might have been eliminated by induced heart attack and cancer are: Jack Rudy (died of a stroke due to an undiagnosed form of aggressive cancer, just weeks after he agreed to testify before Congress about the JFK assassination), Clay Shaw, J. Edgar Hoover, Earlene Roberts (Oswald’s land-lady), Marlyn Monroe, Slobodan Milosevic, Kenneth Lay (former CEO of ENRON – the largest political campaign contributor of Gorge W Bush and Dick Cheney), Matt Simmons, Mark Pittman (a reporter who predicted the financial crisis and exposed Federal Reserve misdoings. Pittman fought to open the Federal Reserve to more scrutiny), Elizabeth Edwards. (suddenly diagnosed with cancer while her husband was campaigning against Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for the presidency of the United States. During a campaign speech to the Council on Foreign Relations in May 2007, Edwards called the War on Terrorism a slogan that was created for political reasons and that it wasn’t a plan to make the United States safe. He went further to compare it to a bumper sticker and that it had damaged the US’s alliances and standing in the world.), … enter here the names of every politically outspoken person, whistle blower or witness who died unexpectedly of a heart attack or who quickly died of an incurable cancer.
Jack Layton can be added to the list of political figureheads assassinated by the US government. Why did the US assassinate Jack Layton? Jack Layton put Canada and Canadians first. Stephen Harper puts the US agenda first. Jack Layton worked for the Canadian people and Canadian interests. Stephen Harper works for the US and imposes US foreign policy on Canadians. Stephen Harper is working with the US through the US Council on Foreign Relations. The US Council on Foreign Relations was formed to promote US foreign interests and its true purpose is to annex Canada.
Aiding and abetting the United States in the annexing of Canada isn’t Stephen Harper’s only crimes. Stephen Harper is divulging guarded and protected state secrets to the United States. A person commits “treason” who b) discloses, without lawful authority, military or scientific material to agents of a foreign state, if he or she knows or should know that the material may be used to impair Canada’s safety or defence. Harmonization, collaboration and information-sharing with the US Department of Homeland Security is treason. Harper knows that his unlawful actions can and will impair Canada’s sovereignty, financial prosperity and defence.
Eventually the U.S. government will simply eliminate the Canadian government and all Canada’s identities – our flag, our Canadian Dollar and even the name Canada – and take over Canada. Harper knows that this is the long term goal of the United States corporate controlled government. Harper persistently sought a majority government – to assume, without lawful authority, the means to dissolve Canada.
The Canadian Criminal Code criminalizes these acts committed by Stephen Harper. Harper’s secretive deals are an attack against the Canadian government and the Canadian people. Harper’s unilateral and clandestine deals with a foreign state are acts of treason as he is a person who is conspiring with a foreign state to undermine and eliminate the territorial sovereignty of Canada, and engaging in acts that he knows will harm and impair the safety and defense of Canada. Attempting to overthrow the government of Canada, spying for a foreign power, revealing state secrets, are considered in peacetime to constitute the crime of “treason” and their perpetrators are traitors.
What must be done to prevent Harper from further harming and undermining the sovereignty of Canada? What can you and I do? Remember that Harper works for Canada and Canadians. Harper is paid by us to protect and defend Canada, its borders, its people and its financial prosperity. Harper is under contract to the Canadian people. If he or anyone else breaches his or her contract to Canada and the Canadian people he or she can be fired. Harper doesn’t have the right to be Prime Minister. Being Prime Minister is a privilege. That privilege can be stripped away at any time when he commits acts of high treason or treason against Canada and the Canadian people. If Harper aids and abets a foreign state to cause a threat to our nation’s safety and defense then charges of treason can be laid against Harper. Harper is not the Canadian government. He is a person. He is a person in the government of Canada who is willfully and deliberately committing high treason and treason by conspiring with the United States to attack our system of government, our territorial boundaries, our sovereignty and our financial prosperity. Harper is working for and in the interest of the United States government.
You would think that Stephen Harper’s actions would alarm Queen Elizabeth II as Stephen Harper is aiding and abetting the US in the infiltration of all Canadian government agencies with armed US agents and soldiers. The Prime Minister of Canada is the primary minister of the Crown. The Canadian prime minister serves at Her Majesty’s pleasure. At Her Majesty’s pleasure is a legal term derived from all legitimate authority for government stems from the Crown. Harper isn’t allowing armed British agents and troops to infiltrate and occupy the Queen’s sovereign called Canada he is aiding and abetting the US government armed agents and troops to infiltrate and subvert Canada’s sovereign authority.
Why hasn’t Elizabeth taken action against Stephen Harper and ousted him for treachery? Because her legitimate authority as Queen of Canada could easily be challenged and refuted in a court of law. How so? Read presscore.ca article titled; “British Monarchy ended with Edward VIII abdication. Elizabeth “assumed” the crown without lawful authority – under false pretense – obtained the crown by intentionally misrepresenting a past or existing fact. Elizabeth isn’t the lawful heir to the throne. She is an impostor – a fraud. According to UK laws and line of succession laws Elizabeth is not the Queen of the UK or Canada or any Commonwealth state. Only the children of a reigning king or queen are legitimate heirs to the throne, and only after the “death” of the reigning king or queen. Elizabeth and her father George VI fraudulently assumed the throne as neither were King Edward VIII’s children and King Edward VIII didn’t die as required by law. His abdication (also required by law) ended the German monarchy over the UK and Canada.
Acts offending the Queen’s Duty, Honor, Country
Contrary to belief and misconception that Canada’s military, police and elected officials hold no official allegiance to Canada, the Canadian people nor any notion of constitution (law), there is an oath that binds our police, our military and our elected officials to protect Canada and Canadians from “Enemies Foreign & Domestic.”
Canada’s military, police and elected officials take the oath of allegiance to the Queen who takes an Oath to Canada. http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN00435.pdf – 28. The Crown’s duty towards the subject.
Since Queen Elizabeth II is the Queen of Canada, she must, according to the 1689 Oath, takes an Oath to rule according to the laws of Canada. If our laws says Stephen Harper’s actions are treason and high treason she, the Queen, must, by oath, uphold the laws of Canada.
The monarch, is bound by “Oath” to uphold all Canadian Laws. The Coronation Oath Act 1688 is an Act of the Parliament of England. It was passed in 1689. The preamble noted that “by the Law and Ancient Usage of this Realm” the monarchs of England had taken a solemn oath at their coronation “to maintain the statute laws and customs of the country and of its inhabitants”. It established a single uniform oath to be taken by future monarchs at their coronation.
The text of the accession declaration, as laid down in the Accession Declaration Act 1910 is as follows:
“I, ELIZABETH do solemnly and sincerely in the presence of God profess, testify, and declare that I am a faithful Protestant, and that I will, according to the true intent of the enactments which secure the Protestant succession to the Throne, uphold and maintain the said enactments to the best of my powers according to law.” ~ November 4, 1952
The legal obligations surrounding the oath are set out in Halsbury’s Laws:
28. The Crown’s duty towards the subject. The essential duties of the Crown towards the subject are now to be found expressed in the terms of the oaths which every monarch is required to take before or at the coronation. The duties imposed by the coronation oath are:
(1) to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the dominions etc belonging or pertaining to them according to their respective laws and customs;
(2) to cause law and justice in mercy to be executed in all judgments, to the monarch’s power;
As the Queen is bound by oath “to govern the peoples of” the dominion of Canada … “according to their respective laws and customs” and “to cause law and justice in mercy to be executed in all judgments, to the monarch’s power;” then so to must Canada’s military, police (RCMP) and elected officials.
So in effect, Canada’s military, police and elected officials are sworn to protect the Queen’s Duty, honor, and country called Canada.
Coronation Oath of 1689
Whereas by the law and ancient usage of this Realm, the Kings and Queens thereof have taken a solemn oath upon the Evangelists at their respective coronations, to maintain the statutes, laws, and customs of the said Realm, and all the people and inhabitants thereof, in their spiritual and civil rights and properties: but forasmuch as the oath itself on such occasion administered, hath heretofore been framed in doubtful words and expressions, with relation to ancient laws and constitutions at this time unknown: to the end therefore that one uniform oath may be in all times to come taken by the Kings and Queens of this Realm, and to them respectively administered at the times of their and every of their coronation: may it please your Majesties that it may be enacted:
And be it enacted by the King’s and Queen’s most excellent majesties, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and the Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, That the oath herein mentioned, and hereafter expressed, shall and may be administered to their most excellent majesties … at the time of their coronation, in the presence of all persons that shall be then and there present at the solemnizing thereof, by the Archbishop of Canterbury, or the Archbishop of York, or either of them, or any other bishop of this Realm, whom the King Queen’s majesty shall thereunto appoint, and who shall be hereby thereunto respectively authorized; which oath followeth, and shall be administered in this manner; that is to say,
The archbishop of bishop shall say, “Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people of this Kingdom of England, and the dominions thereto belonging, according to the statutes in Parliament agreed on, and the laws and customs of the same?”
The Queen responded, “I solemnly promise so to do.”
Archbishop or bishop, “Will you to your power cause law and justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgments?”
The Queen responded, “I will.”
Short URL: https://presscore.ca/news/?p=7193
The Halifax International Security Forum was founded in 2009 as a propaganda program within the German Marshall Fund (founded June 5, 1972 by West German Chancellor Willy Brandt) by the Crown in Canada using Crown Corp ACOA & DND funds. The Halifax International Security Forum is a front that is used to recruit top US, UK and Canadian gov and military officials as double agents for Canada's WWI, WWII enemy and wage new Vatican Germany Cold War.
High Treason: s.46 (1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada (c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, ..., whether or not a state of war exists". Every one who, in Canada assists Canada's enemies wage "piecemeal WWIII" Cold War by organizing, funding and participating in the Germany government politically and militarily benefitting / lead Halifax International Security Forum is committing high treason.
Please take a moment to sign a petition to 
Loading ...
1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 185 invalidates (voids) all papacies since October 26, 1958 due to the fact Cardinal Giuseppe Siri was elected Pope on the Third ballot on Oct 26 1958 but the new Pope Gregory XVII was illegally prevented from assuming the office. A Pope was elected on October 26, 1958. Thousands of people witnessed a new Pope being elected by seeing white smoke and millions were informed by Vatican radio broadcasts beginning at 6:00 PM Rome time on October 26, 1958. The papacy of Francis, Benedict, John Paul II, John Paul I, Paul VI, John XXIII and any and all of their respective doctrines, bulls, letter patents and the Second Vatican Council are all invalidated (having no force, binding power, or validity) by Canon 185 because the 1958 conclave of cardinals elected Cardinal Giuseppe Siri Pope on Oct 26 1958. Cardinal Giuseppe Siri accepted the papacy by taking the name Pope Gregory XVII but was illegally prevented from assuming his elected office.. According to Canon 185 Cardinal Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli illegally assumed the papacy 2 days later by fraud and grave fear, unjustly inflicted against Cardinal Giuseppe Siri who was lawfully elected Pope Gregory XVII. Because no Pope has been lawfully elected since October 26, 1958 the Holy See (la Santa Sede/Seat) remains vacant.
Hold the Crown (alias for temporal authority of the reigning Pope), the Crown appointed Governor General of Canada David Lloyd Johnston, the Crown's Prime Minister (servant) Stephen Joseph Harper, the Crown's Minister of Justice and Attorney General Peter Gordon MacKay and the Crown's traitorous military RCMP force, accountable for their crimes of treason and high treason against Canada and acts preparatory thereto. The indictment charges that they, on and thereafter the 22nd day of October in the year 2014, at Parliament in the City of Ottawa in the Region of Ontario did, use force and violence, via the staged false flag Exercise Determined Dragon 14, for the purpose of overthrowing and besieging the government of Canada contrary to Section 46 of the Criminal Code. In a society governed by the rule of law, the government and its officials and agents are subject to and held accountable under the law. Sign the online 
Two of the most obvious signs of a dictatorship in Canada is traitorous Stephen Harper flying around in a "military aircraft" and using Canadian Special Forces "military" personnel from JTF2 and personnel from the Crown's traitorous martial law "military" RCMP force as his personal bodyguards.
“When it comes to the Canadian Armed Forces, they are, soldier for soldier, sailor for sailor, airman for airman, the best in the world,” said Harper in North Bay for Armed Forces Day, June 1, 2012.
Stephen should remember that Canadians have a rich history of sniping. Canadian snipers were famous for their actions during the World Wars – one credited with the most kills as a sniper during WW1. They have routinely beaten their British and American counterparts in sniping contests and competitions. In the War in Afghanistan, a Canadian sniper beat the previous world record for longest kill (set by a US Marine in the Vietnam War)… only to have his record broken by a fellow Canadian not long after.
I wouldn’t go making any plans to surrender Canada to the US or any NWO as you might have Canada’s best defending their duty, honor and country.
Obama explaining to the Stephen Harper that in order for Canada to be annexed he has to go.
Obama to Harper – “You putz, I’ll own you too and because you moronically betrayed your own country, you can’t be trusted and I’ll have to authorize the CIA to get rid of you too. Get it? You’ll no longer have a country. You’ll no longer be the Prime Minister of any country. And either I or the people you betrayed will kill you for it. Isn’t that hilarious? “
It would appear that “Duty, honor, country” has no meaning, whatsoever, for Stephen Harper, the RCMP, CSIS, our elected representatives in Parliament, members of the Canadian Armed Forces or to the vast majority of Canadians as nothing is being done or even said to serve, protect and defend our country and put an end to this treachery,
Am I the only one, out of the 26 million adult Canadians, who can see that Stephen Harper is willfully and deliberately engaging in acts of treachery against Canada and the Canadian people? Apparently so, as the RCMP, CSIS, our members of Parliament, and members of our Armed Forces have taken an oath of allegiance, not to Canada, but to the Queen, Her heirs and successors.
“I do swear/solemnly affirm that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her heirs and successors, according to law.”
The sooner the US people come to terms that Obama is a British subject – born in Kenya – the better. It is very important that they remove him from office before he gives the US to his Queen. The US won their Independence in 1776 only to lose it in 2012 because they did absolutely nothing to expose the Trojan Horse who goes by the assumed name of Barack Hussein Obama. Assumed name as his real and only legal name is Barry Soetoro, born in Kenya.
So is the US taking over Canada or Canada taking over the US? Both are politically correct as both leaders are betraying their countries by proxy. England is taking back both. The US has been defeated by the British in 2012, not by another war with England but by England’s debt bearing Federal Reserve Note. And Canada is reverting back to the assumed monarchy. I say assumed as the French, specifically Jacques Cartier claimed what is now Canada for France. Canada was discovered in the year 1534, by Jacques Cartier, not by the British.
Claude de Pontbriand, the Seigneur de Montréal (landlord of the Château de Montréal), accompanied Jacques Cartier on his expedition up the Saint Lawrence, , and was with him on October 3, 1535, when he reached Hochelaga, on the site of the present day city of Montreal.
Pontbriand, I am very proud to say, is my mother’s maiden name. Her father, a Pontbriand descendant, was born in Bangor Maine. My father is Scottish. Scots won 2 wars of independence from England. Canada is suppose to be a sovereign country, but the Queen of England insists on being our (the US and Canada) master. Now you see my connection and support for the US people and my dislike and distrust for the English.
Why hasn’t the RCMP done anything to curtail this abuse of office, this treachery by Stephen Harper? The RCMP are not who you think they are.
The Canadian RCMP do not serve and protect the people of Canada. They serve and protect the monarchy and her governors in the House of Commoners. No this isn’t a typo. The Canadian House of Commons is actually the Queen’s House of Commoners. We, the commoners elected representatives who we ignorantly think will represent us in the Queen’s Parliament. The truth is, we have no say. Not by vote and elected representation. Not by assembly and by petition. Not legally. We are commoners.
The RCMP is recognized by the World as the Royal’s Mounted Police. Their traditional uniform is and will always be the red coat – of a British soldier. The Red Serge tunic that identified initially the NWMP, and later the RNWMP and the present RCMP, is of the standard British military pattern – exactly like the one worn by the Buckingham Palace (the Queen’s official residence) Horse Guards pictured above.
The RCMP are the foot soldiers for the Queen. They and the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada – the highest court of Canada – represent and safeguard the Queen’s sovereign called Canada. They do as they are ordered to do by the Queen. The Supreme Court of Canada Building is home to the Supreme Court of Canada. It also contains two court rooms used by both the Federal Court of Canada and the Federal Court of Appeal. Construction began in 1939, with the cornerstone laid by Queen Elizabeth II herself.
The Queen rules not only Canada but the United States. She owns the Federal Reserve and the IRS. The IRS acts as the bully-boy to coerce payment of the unlawful federal income tax and the money they extort (to obtain from a person by force, threat, intimidation, or undue or illegal power – a.k.a. Queen as the US supposedly fought and won their independence) from the American people (Canada and the US) goes to the Federal Reserve and the Queen of England.
Queen Elisabeth II decided that Harper and Obama will work together to wipe Canada and the United States off the map (first by tax, then by Federal Reserve imposed debt and inflation and now by removing the 2 countries’ sovereign borders) and form her kingdom called America.
When an RCMP constable is sworn in, he or she takes a three part oath:
Oath of Allegiance: “Do you solemnly swear that you will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, her heirs and successors according to the law, so help you God?”
No allegiance to Canada only to Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs and successors.
Oath of Office: “Do you solemnly swear that you will faithfully, diligently and impartially execute and perform the duties required of you as a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and will well and truly obey and perform all lawful orders and instructions that you receive, without fear, favor or affection of or towards any person, so help you God?”
An RCMP is required to “obey and perform all lawful orders and instructions that you receive” – emphasis on orders and instructions – like a good soldier must do.
Oath of Secrecy: “Do you solemnly swear that you will keep absolutely secret all knowledge and information of which you may become possessed through your position with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police; that you will not, without due authority in that behalf, discuss with members of the Force, or any other person, either by word or by letter, any matter which may come to your notice through your employment with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, so help you God?”
And lastly to keep you mouth shut – a permanent gag order even before you begin your duties -”keep absolutely secret all knowledge and information of which you may become possessed through your position with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police”.
To each of these questions, the RCMP response is: “I do so swear.”
So if you or I were to go to the RCMP to report any illegal activity or treasonous act by our elected officials no investigation and no charges will ever be laid as they are forbidden to do so. They will, however, start investigating you or I and lay trumped up charges against you or I for daring to oppose the Queen’s will.
The Royal Military College of Canada also represents the Queen and her England. Officers in the Canadian military wear the same Red Serge tunic of the standard British military pattern.
In Canada there is only one authority – the Queen’s – manifested through eleven governments. Illustrated by the oaths taken at various levels of Canadian society.
PRIVY COUNCILLOR’S OATH ( taken by all cabinet ministers)
I, [name], do solemnly and sincerely swear that I shall be a true and faithful servant to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, as a member of Her Majesty’s Privy Council for Canada. I shall keep secret all matters committed and revealed to me in this capacity, or that shall be secretly treated of in Council. Generally, in all things I shall do as a faithful and true servant ought to do for Her Majesty. So help me God.
OATH FOR MPs OR MPPs, MNAs, MLAs, MHAs, ETC.
I, [name], do swear that I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her Heirs and Successors according to law.
The Constitution Act 1867 [formerly The British North America Act], The Fifth Schedule
CITIZENSHIP OATH
Before obtaining Canadian citizenship, an individual must take this oath: “I swear [or I solemnly affirm] that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors according to law, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfill my duties as a Canadian citizen.”
And at the funeral of US president John F Kennedy
It is our duty as Canadians to make reasonable efforts to prevent Stephen Harper from committing acts that attempts to impair or eliminates the political independence and territorial integrity of Canada. How? Make Harper accountable to the law. Indict Harper. Any Canadian can lay formal criminal charges of treason and high treason against Stephen Harper.
The penalty for high treason is life imprisonment. The penalty for treason is imprisonment up to a maximum of life, or up to 14 years for conduct under subsection (2)(b) or (e) in peacetime. If this were 1882 and Harper was aiding and abetting the US in the invasion and occupation of Canada he would have been sentenced to death.
Last June 6 PRESS Core tried to warn Canadians about Stephen Harper in an article titled “Stephen Harper secretly going ahead with North American Initiative.” In that article http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=2789 it stated:
An unclassified US diplomatic document released by Wikileaks outlines the secret agenda of the Stephen Harper government.
Communique ID 05OTTAWA268 SUBJECT: PLACING A NEW NORTH AMERICAN INITIATIVE IN ITS ECONOMIC POLICY CONTEXT states:
2. SBU) An incremental and pragmatic package of tasks for a new North American Initiative (NAI) will likely gain the most support among Canadian policymakers. Our research leads us to conclude that such a package should tackle both “security” and “prosperity” goals. This fits the recommendations of Canadian economists who have assessed the options for continental integration. While in principle many of them support more ambitious integration goals, like a customs union/single market and/or single currency, most believe the incremental approach is most appropriate at this time, and all agree that it helps pave the way to these goals if and when North Americans choose to pursue them.
How do they plan on executing the North American Initiative? By using a false and fabricated border security issue. The US Communique makes this clear with the following statement:
“We believe that, given growing Canadian concern about “border risk” and its effects on investment, a focus on the “security” side could also produce the most substantial economic/trade benefits.”
6. (SBU) A stronger continental “security perimeter” can strengthen economic performance, mainly by improving efficiency at land borders and airports. It could also facilitate future steps toward trilateral economic integration, such as a common external tariff or a customs union, if and when our three countries chose to pursue them. Paradoxically, the security and law enforcement aspects of the envisioned initiative could hold as much – or more – potential for broad economic benefits than the economic dimension.
So as to not attract undesired political and public attention to the secret North American Initiative (NAI) agenda the US recommends Stephen Harper proceed with an “incremental” approach to integration.
Today Stephen Harper is now working closely with United States government officials to quietly implement the North American Initiative. His actions are a betrayal of Canada’s sovereignty. Stephen Harper is helping a foreign government – the United States government – to overthrow the sovereignty of Canada by causing serious injury to the economic prosperity and political Independence of Canada.
The basic principles of sovereignty are; 1) territorial integrity, 2) border inviolability, 3) supremacy of the state and 4) the supreme lawmaking authority within its jurisdiction. Stephen Harper is violating not just one of the principles of sovereignty but all 4.
The Israeli attacks against Iran at the end of this month has several military and political objectives. None have to do with Iran developing nuclear energy. The main objective is to form the New World Order by starting WWIII and kill billions. The globalists (Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Obama, Harper, Merkle, Cameron, Moon, Kissinger, Gates, Rockefeller) want to reduce the population of the World to a NWO controllable few hundred million.
False flag attacks in the US are to coincide with the Israeli attacks against Iran. This is aimed at imposing martial law in the US and suspend the November election indefinitely as well as Congress and the supreme US law called the US Constitution. A false flag attack will also occur in Canada some time thereafter whereby Harper will dissolve Parliament and US forces will enter Canada to police the not so easily fooled Canadian people.
The plan is to create a false state of emergency in both the US and Canada so that corporate America can take over Canada and integrate its provinces and territories into corporate America – one of the Pope’s Ten Kingdoms in the New World Order. The Vatican controlled New World Order cannot rise without a major false flag event in the US and Canada. Europe is already occupied as one of the Vatican’s Ten Kingdoms called the EU.
But at least in Canada we have been prepared for such treachery by Stephen Harper. Canada has a secret volunteer militia of snipers and special improvised weapons experts at the ready to eliminate the leadership of this threat to the sovereignty of Canada. This volunteer militia army was formed when traitor Brian Mulroney was Prime Minister of Canada. Its only mission is to eliminate the entire top leadership of the American government and their co-conspiring Canadian traitors. It doesn’t matter if the president survives the CIA false flag attack and leads America or the unelected people of COG (Continuity of Government) their days as leader of an unlawfully fabricated America are numbered.
Another treasonous act by Stephen Harper is allowing armed police officers from the U.S. to cross the border into Canada to make arrests under Harper’s Aiding and Abetting US infiltration act called – “The Integrated Cross Border Law Enforcement Operations Act”. Harper included this anti-sovereignty act in the controversial omnibus budget bill. On its own it would never have been enacted so Harper attached it to the essential budget bill. Harper is now working out the next phase of the plan, a permanent occupation of Canada by US armed agents. Canadian legal experts have argued against Harper’s plan arguing that the deal jeopardizes Canadian sovereignty and Canada’s national security.
Stuart Trew, a spokesman for the Council of Canadians, said the act in its current form is already a “pretty serious compromise of sovereignty when it comes to policing and security.”
Harper must be stopped. If Parliament, the RCMP, and the courts are negligent in their duties to end Harper’s treachery then perhaps it is time for Canadians to take matters in their own hands to protect and defend our country from this US armed invasion and armed occupation.
In Canada, all citizens are subject to the ordinary laws of general application, both criminal and civil. There is no exemption for parliamentarians, nor is there any immunity or special rights that accrue to parliamentarians, outside of the limited application of parliamentary privilege. Although the rights and immunities of parliamentarians under parliamentary privilege include freedom from arrest in civil actions, they offer no protection from criminal charges – treason, high treason, genocide, war crimes, election tampering, election fraud, fraud, conspiracy to commit murder, murder, ….
Included in the doctrine of parliamentary privilege are disciplinary powers that give the Senate and the House of Commons the right to expel their members. This power has seldom been exercised, partly because it is so extreme. However, on March 21, 2011, the Canadian House of Commons found the Stephen Harper Government in contempt of Parliament. As such, a motion of no confidence was introduced in the House. On March 25, 2011, Members of Parliament voted on this motion, declaring a lack of confidence by a vote of 156 to 145 and expelled Stephen Harper as leader of the Canadian government and forced an election. The contempt offense is unique in Canadian history. In a wider context, it is the first time that a government in the 54-member Commonwealth of Nations has been found in contempt of Parliament.
Harper, a parliamentarians, has no exemptions from criminal charges, nor does he have any immunity or special rights. Once a person is elected to the House of Commons, there are no constitutional provisions and few statutory provisions regarding the ousting of the member. Section 35 of the Parliament of Canada Act provides that a member’s seat will be vacated and the member’s election declared void, in cases where he or she:
1. accepts any office or commission, or is concerned or interested in any contract, agreement, service or work, that, by virtue of this Division, renders a person incapable of being elected to, or of sitting or voting in, the House of Commons,
Section 750 of the Criminal Code, which applies to both members of the Senate and the House, provides:
750. (1) Where a person is convicted of an indictable offence (Every one who commits treason or high treason is guilty of an indictable offence) for which the person is sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more and holds, at the time that person is convicted, an office under the Crown or other public employment, the office or employment forthwith becomes vacant.
Canadian Criminal Code
468. Every superior court of criminal jurisdiction has jurisdiction to try any indictable offence.
Indictable offences include:
section 47 (treason),
section 51 (intimidating Parliament or a legislature),
section 235 (murder);
the offence of being an accessory after the fact to high treason or
an offence under section 119 (bribery) by the holder of a judicial office;
an offence under any of sections 4 to 7 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act;
the offence of attempting to commit any offence mentioned in Section 469 subparagraphs (a)(i) to (vii); or
the offence of conspiring to commit any offence mentioned in Section 469 paragraph (a).
The war of 1812 established the United States as Canada’s adversary and enemy. The U.S. attempted but failed to take over Canada militarily during the War of 1812. On November 27, 1812, U.S. forces invaded Lower Canada but the invasion was repelled by Canadian and First Nation forces. Canadian forces were so successful in repelling the U.S. invasion that they successfully captured and burned the U.S. capital Washington, DC.
The war of 1812 ended in a military stalemate. Neither side had a reason to continue or a chance of gaining a decisive success that would compel their opponents to cede territory or advantageous peace terms. The fact that the war ended in a stalemate, neither side conceded to defeat, means the war was never won nor ever ended. Both sides only declared a truce – an agreement between enemies or opponents to stop fighting or arguing for a certain time. However, what the U.S. couldn’t achieve militarily in 1812 is now being achieved with the traitorous actions of our political leader – Stephen Harper.