How to get rid of the Federal Reserve – forfeiture of franchise for violation of law.
World news Thursday, March 1st, 2012According to the above video the Federal Reserve Bank’s 100 year charter is coming to an end in 2013. A PC reader submitted the link to this video and stated – “People need to be aware if they want to end the Fed to stand up against a secret middle of the night new 100 year charter and start putting pressure on politicians ASAP”
The Federal Reserve Charter is not coming to an end, not in 2012 or 2013 or any time thereafter. As I’ve stated before in PRESS Core article titled “Federal Reserve audit forfeits franchise for securities fraud and embezzlement of $16 trillion.” – United States Code, TITLE 12 CHAPTER 3 SUBCHAPTER IX § 341. Second. states that the U.S. Federal Reserve Banks are to be dissolved today by “forfeiture of franchise for violation of law.” Securities fraud and embezzlement by the Federal Reserve Bank is cause for immediate forfeiture and imprisonment of the Federal Reserve and its bankers.
For months PRESS Core has told the United States people “How to get rid of the FED“. How is stated in the far right column. It states:
“Each of the U.S. Federal Reserve Banks can be dissolved today by an act of Congress or “forfeiture of franchise for violation of law.” How the American people can end the unconstitutional control of their money using the Federal Reserve interest bearing counterfeit Note is codified in the United States Code, TITLE 12 CHAPTER 3 SUBCHAPTER IX § 341. General enumeration of powers. What laws have the Federal Reserve violated that would warrant their immediate forfeiture? Counterfeiting, money laundering, trafficking of counterfeit Federal Reserve Notes, securities fraud, fraud, insider trading, extortion, and embezzlement.”
“Only the Congress of the U.S., which comprises of the Senate and the House of Representatives has the power to coin and issue the U.S. money supply and regulate the value thereof? [Article 1 Section 1 and Section 8] Nowhere, in the Constitution does it give Congress the power or authority to transfer any powers granted under the Constitution to a private corporation. Therefore the Federal Reserve is null and void.”
The original Federal Reserve Act of 1913 did provide for an expiration of the corporate “power” of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks to exist in 20 years from the banks’ organization.
Sec. 4 … the said Federal reserve bank shall become a body corporate and as such … shall have power: … Second. To have succession for a period of twenty years from its organization unless it is sooner dissolved by an Act of Congress, or unless its franchise becomes forfeited by some violation of law. Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (P.L. 63-43, 38 STAT. 251, 12 USC 221).
However, this 20-year corporate life was amended to perpetual in 1927 by Act of Feb. 25, 1927 (44 Stat. 1234) as follows:
Second. To have succession after February 25, 1927, until dissolved by Act of Congress or until forfeiture of franchise for violation of law.
This is where it stands today. The U.S. Federal Reserve Banks charter doesn’t end in 2013 or 2012. The charter is perpetual – which means “Never ending or changing”. Americans can however do away with the Federal Reserve with an act of Congress or “forfeiture of franchise for violation of law.”
As stated in PRESS Core article titled “Occupy Wall Street protesters demands the abolishing of the Federal Reserve.”
The Federal Reserve can be dissolved today with just one simple Act of Congress. The power to coin money and to regulate the value thereof was illegally taken away from Congress and given to the unelected private bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks. It is within the power of the United States Congress to take back that right and to punish the bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks for illegally counterfeiting the securities and lawful coin of the United States.
If Congress refuses to dissolve the Federal Reserve then the Federal Reserve can still be forfeited by some violation of law. This is codified in the United States Code, 12 U.S.C. § 341. The code doesn’t specify what type of violation of the law so any violation of the law by the Federal Reserve is cause for immediate forfeiture of the Federal Reserve.
The Federal Reserve has violated the United States supreme law. The U.S. Constitution – Article 1 Section 8 – Congress shall have the power “To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof”. Other crimes committed by the Federal Reserve includes counterfeiting, money laundering, embezzlement, extortion, theft, fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud, and bribery.
To counterfeit means to illegally imitate something. The worthless Federal Reserve Note is illegally printed to imitate the U.S. Dollar. Only the United States Congress has the authority to coin the U.S. money and regulate the value thereof. The United States Constitution clearly states that authority. Nothing and no one can ever change that Constitutional authority, not even the Unconstitutional and therefore illegal Federal Reserve Act.
The Federal Reserve Note isn’t a U.S. dollar. It is a worthless piece of paper masquerading, illegally, as a U.S. Dollar. What does every American see printed at the top of the Federal Reserve counterfeit paper? It doesn’t say United States Note, it says Federal Reserve Note.
Prominent Americans such as Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson have argued and fought against the central banking polices used throughout Europe.
If you look at the Federal Reserve website – http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/section4.htm – you will see the means to remove their control of the United States –
4. General Corporate Powers
Upon the filing of such certificate with the Comptroller of the Currency as aforesaid, the said Federal reserve bank shall become a body corporate and as such, and in the name designated in such organization certificate, shall have power —
First. To adopt and use a corporate seal.
Second. To have succession after the approval of this Act until dissolved by Act of Congress or until forfeiture of franchise for violation of law.
Third. To make contracts
Fourth. To sue and be sued, complain and defend, in any court of law or equity.
So get out there and indict each and every Federal Reserve banker. If you’ve been defrauded out of your home, pensions or life savings by the actions of the Federal Reserve Banks you have a just cause to file formal criminal charges against these gangsters. File charges against the Federal Reserve banks and their franchise is forfeited for violation of law.
Want evidence that will help you win your case and remove the Federal Reserve. Use the US Congressional audit report of the Federal Reserve banks called the “Sanders Report” against them. In PRESS Core article titled – “Federal Reserve audit forfeits franchise for securities fraud and embezzlement of $16 trillion.” I’ve stated:
“An audit of the Federal Reserve has revealed in the Sanders Report (link to Sanders Report) that the privately owned Federal Reserve secretly and unlawfully doled out more than $16 trillion in zero interest loans and concealed electronic funds transfers to some of the largest financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world. The non-partisan, investigative arm of Congress determined that the Federal Reserve acted illegally. In fact, according to the report, the Federal Reserve knew their financial transactions were illegal and provided conflict of interest waivers to its employees and private contractors so they could keep investments in the same financial institutions and corporations that were given emergency loans. The report is evidence that reveals major securities fraud in the embezzlement of $16 trillion by the Federal Reserve. Securities fraud and embezzlement are both felony criminal offenses. Any criminal offense committed by the Federal Reserve forfeits the Federal Reserve franchise – U.S. Code TITLE 12 CHAPTER 3 SUBCHAPTER IX § 341. Second”
A more detailed Government Accountability Office investigation into corruption charges, securities fraud, embezzlement, money-laundering and conflicts of interest at the Fed was due on Oct. 18. The Sanders Report on the GAO Audit on Major Conflicts of Interest at the Federal Reserve
Short URL: https://presscore.ca/news/?p=5684
Example of a fabricated (therefore invalid) legal name
Image also gives evidence of illegal warrantless domestic spying of the American people. All wiretapping of American citizens by the National Security Agency requires a warrant from a three-judge court set up under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Spying involves a government or individual obtaining information that is considered secret or confidential without the permission of the holder of the information.
The 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) regulates U.S. government agencies’ carrying out of physical searches, and electronic surveillance, wherein a significant purpose is the gathering of foreign intelligence information. “Foreign intelligence information” is defined in 50 U.S.C. § 1801 as information necessary to protect the U.S. or its allies against actual or potential attack from a foreign power, sabotage or international terrorism. FISA defines a “foreign power” as a foreign government or any faction(s) of a foreign government not substantially composed of US persons, or any entity directed or controlled by a foreign government. FISA provides for both criminal and civil liability for intentional electronic surveillance under color of law except as authorized by statute.
FISA provides two documents for the authorization of surveillance. First, FISA allows the Justice Department to obtain warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) before or up to 72 hours after the beginning of the surveillance. FISA authorizes a FISC judge to issue a warrant for the electronic cameras if “there is probable cause to believe that… the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power.” 50 U.S.C. §1805(a)(3). Second, FISA permits the President or his delegate to authorize warrantless surveillance for the collection of foreign intelligence if “there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party”. 50 U.S.C. §1802(a)(1).
Do you honestly believe there was a warrant issued that would allow carte blanche video surveillance of the US general public? FISA prohibits exactly was is being done across the United States. FISA provides for both criminal and civil liability for intentional electronic surveillance under color of law except as authorized by statute.
Again any purported law (statute) that does not originate from Constitutional due process is a fictional law without validity. The Constitution of the United States Amendment IV clearly states that the government, both state and federal, are prohibited from conducting warrantless searches and seizures of the US people –
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
I strongly urge every American to download the Constitution of the United States and its first 10 Amendments or Bill of Rights to their cell phones, PDAs, tablets, iPods and Laptops. Print out a paper copy of the Bill of Rights. Carry it with you everywhere you go in the United States. Keep a copy in your vehicle’s glove box or in your purse, lunchbox or briefcase. These are all the legal papers you will ever need. Copy the last 2 comments above to them too.
Every President, Vice-President, Secretary of State, Congress Man, Congress Woman, Senator, Governor, Supreme Court Judge, police officer and military person has taken an oath to serve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. If any of them violate it they are to be removed from office.
Both the “THE PATRIOT ACT”, and the “NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT” are bills of attainder (also known as an act of attainder or writ of attainder). Both are fictional law without validity because both are acts of a legislature that declare a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a judicial trial.
The United States Constitution forbids legislative bills of attainder under Article I, Section 9. It was considered an excess or abuse by the British monarchy and Parliament. The provision forbidding state law bills of attainder, Article I, Section 10, reflects the importance that the framers attached to this issue, since the unamended constitution imposes very few restrictions on state governments’ power.
Within the U.S. Constitution, the clauses forbidding attainder laws serve two purposes. First, they reinforced the separation of powers, by forbidding the legislature to perform judicial or executive functions— since the outcome of any such acts of legislature would of necessity take the form of a bill of attainder. Second, they embody the concept of due process, which was partially reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9; Clause 3 is “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed”. The constitution of every State also expressly forbids bills of attainder. For example, Wisconsin’s constitution Article I, Section 12 reads:
No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.
Contrast this with the subtly more modern variation of the Texas version: Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws: Impairing Obligation of Contracts: “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made”.
Every American need not worry about their government taking away their rights and freedoms. They need not worry about being held without charge. They need not worry about martial law. They need not worry about the Department of Homeland Security and the Patriot Act. They need not worry about FEMA camps. Why not? Every bill signed by the president of the United States has to comply with the Constitution of the United States. Any contradiction of the Constitution of the United States is a violation of the supreme law of the United States. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America and the people.
The Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787, by the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and ratified by conventions in eleven states. The first ten amendments are known as the Bill of Rights. The Constitution has been amended seventeen times (for a total of 27 amendments) and its principles are applied in courts of law by judicial review.
In order to become president of the United States one must 1st be voted into office and before he or she can assume the duties of the president of the United States he or she must take a verbal oath.
The oath of office of the President of the United States is an oath or affirmation “required” by the United States Constitution before the President begins the execution of the office. The wording is specified in Article Two, Section One, Clause Eight:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Every president including George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, George W Bush and Barack Hussein Obama placed their hand on the Bible and gave their word to the United States people that they will “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” This oath is required of them all and is declared verbally so that all can bear witnesses to this contract to the United States people. Why verbally and not a signed oath. Because verbally the person taking the oath is declaring through his or her own spoken words that he or she promises to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” If the oath were written the wording could be written in such a way as to pledge allegiance to a fictional United States.
The Constitution was written to prevent any abuse of it. If the oath were written and the name Constitution of United States was written with all capital letters the person seeking to become president of the United States would be declaring their allegiance to a newly fabricated Constitution of United States. The legal basis behind the creation and use of all capital letters names is done to create fabricated legal names such as “CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES”. Fabricated legal names can then be used to fabricate additional legal names such as “THE PATRIOT ACT”, “NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT”, or “THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT”. “Fictions” arise from the law, not the law from fictions. Bastard legal names originate from any judicial/governmental actor that wishes to create them, regardless of whether he/she/it is empowered by law to do so. However, a law can never originate from a fictional foundation that doesn’t exist.
The generic and original US Constitution was validated by treaty between individual nation states (all of which are artificial, corporate entities since they exist in abstract idea and construct). Contained within it is the required due process of law for all the participating nation states of that treaty. Representatives of the people in each nation state agreed upon and signed it. The federal government is not only created by it, but is also bound to operate within the guidelines of Constitutional due process. Any purported law that does not originate from Constitutional due process is a fictional law without validity. Thus, the true test of any American law is its basis of due process according to the organic US Constitution. Was it created according to the lawful process or created outside of lawful process? US laws like the “THE PATRIOT ACT”, “NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT” (a bill of attainder), or “THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT” were “fabricated” outside of lawful process and are therefore invalid – a fictional law without validity.
Every American need not worry about their government taking away their rights and freedoms because any purported law that does not originate from Constitutional due process is a fictional law without validity.
The Bill of Rights which is the collective name for the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution states:
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment III
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Any purported law that does not originate from Constitutional due process, which includes the Bill of Rights, is a fictional law without validity. The Constitution of the United States prohibits Congress from making any law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances; prohibits the disarming of the American people; prohibits posse comitatus; prohibits unreasonable and unwarranted searches and seizures; prohibits the deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; prohibits indefinite detention and denial of trial by jury; prohibits excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment; prohibits the infringement of any rights not specifically enumerated in the Constitution and entrusts all powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies … If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” – Thomas Jefferson
“The rich will strive to establish their dominion and enslave the rest. They always did. They always will… They will have the same effect here as elsewhere, if we do not, by (the power of) government, keep them in their proper spheres.” – Gouverneur Morris of Pennsylvania
“Let me issue and control a nation’s money supply, and I care not who makes its laws.” – Mayer Amschel Rothschild, Founder of Rothschild Banking Dynasty
What the legal US dollar looks like
On this Note it states – “United States Note”. The illegal counterfeit states – “Federal Reserve Note”
Ever since the Federal Reserve bankers illegally took away control of the U.S. money from Congress with the Federal Reserve Act in 1913, the U.S. currency has lost 96% of it’s purchasing power. Before 1913 all U.S. money was coined by the U.S. Congress. The United States Constitution only gave Congress the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof.
US president John F Kennedy tried to eliminate the Federal Reserve. Kennedy created & signed Executive Order 11110 which effectively would put an end to the Federal Reserve’s control over the USA money supply. The Executive Order effectively initiated the creation of a debt free, bank note (dollar bill) backed by, not gold, but physical silver reserves in the US Treasury. They were designed to compete with Federal Reserve bank notes, and would eventually replace them completely. $4 billion of these notes were actually printed and put into circulation before Kennedy was assassinated. Kennedy started with just $2 and $5 denominations. And they were in the process of printing $10 and $20 bills but Kennedy was assassinated and all of legal US bills were removed from circulation.