RCMP military forces assault First Nations Canadians to cover up Enviroment Canada raid of Irving Oil Canaport

Posted by Paul W Kincaid Corruption, World news Thursday, October 17th, 2013

RCMP engaging in a military operation on Canadian soil – 10.17.2013

Progressive Conservative Premier of New Brunswick David Alward (a Crown agent) illegally authorized the RCMP to use military force and attack a group of First Nations and New Brunswick Canadian citizens peacefully protesting Irving Oil shale gas fracking operations on Irving Oil owned land just outside of Rexton New Brunswick Canada on Thursday. The RCMP, were supported by military weapon armed/camouflaged soldiers when they launched the unprovoked attack against First Nations Canadians. Irving Oil contracted the shale gas operations to U.S. Southwestern Energy (Houston, TX).

Irving Oil solicited the aid (influence peddling and bribery) of NB Premier David Alward to authorize the RCMP to use force against federally (treaty) protected First Nations people, to kill a nationally televised story concerning a raid by Environment Canada investigators of an Irving Oil facility.

Environment Canada officer raided Irving Oil Canaport Thursday morning to search for and collect evidence relating to an investigation of a major toxic gas leak that killed 7,500 migrating songbirds at the Irving Oil’s Canaport gas plant in Saint John, New Brunswick. Environment Canada officers arrived at Canaport LNG just before 9 a.m. on Thursday. This Environment Canada (a federal department ) raid of Irving Oil Canaport was reported on CBC and the National News just prior to the RCMP and military forces assault against the unarmed peaceful protesters protesting the Irving Oil shale gas operations on Irving Oil land.

Until the national news broke about Irving Oil venting toxic and deadly gas into the atmosphere, killing thousands of migrating birds, the RCMP supported the “lawful” protests (Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – freedoms of peaceful assembly and association.) and did not enforce a court injunction that Irving Oil lawyers illegally acquired for the U.S. oil and gas drilling company – Southwestern Energy (Houston, TX).

The RCMP could not enforce the Irving Oil petitioned court injunction because a court injunction is not a law. The provinces do not have the constitutional authority to “enact” law. Laws can only be passed or changed with the approval of both houses of Parliament. A court injunction is nothing more than an prejudicial “administrative ordinance” based solely on a procedural error (is error within the procedure or steps in the experiment that cause the value received to not be the true one). A court Injunction can never be enforced because it is bias – prejudice. A court injunction is solicited by a “corporation”(Irving Oil) to influence the opinion of a Crown (City of London Corporation) judge in favor of the petitioning “corporation”. Irving Oil violated statute law – influence peddling and bribery of Judges or members of Parliament or Provincial Legislative.

Military combat dressed snipers were photographed (above image) by various news agencies targeting First Nations and Canadian citizens, with RCMP officers watching. Progressive Conservative David Alward and federal RCMP police officers allowed assault rifle armed soldiers (snipers) to target First Nations and Canadian citizens – an act of war.

David Alward and the RCMP coordinated with heavily armed members of the ERT military forces and engaged in an armed attack against First Nations Canadians. David Alward (representing the Crown a.k.a City of London Corporation) and the RCMP are guilty of high treason and treason when they used military force in an armed attack against First Nations Canadians peacefully protesting a Irving Oil shale gas confidence scheme that is being perpetrated on Canadian soil.

The RCMP stated at least one shot was fired by someone other than police and that police are also investigating suspected explosive devices at the scene. The single shot fired was from the above sniper – a soldier.

Section 46 of the Criminal Code of Canada

High treason

(1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,
(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or
(c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.

Treason
(2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
(a) uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;
(c) conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
(e) conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.”

In Canada the government of Canada derives it authority from the people. All executive authority is understood to derive from the people. The most fundamental concept of democracy is that government only exists to secure the rights of the people and is based on the consent of the governed. For government to be legitimate the authority of a government depends on the consent of the people. Elections gives unequivocal evidence to this fact. The Prime Minister of Canada and all premiers, senators and majors only have legitimacy based on the consent (by vote) of the governed – the Canadian people. The use of force or violence by the RCMP, with the aid of and in cooperation with armed members of a foreign state – the United States – for the purpose of overthrowing the authority and rights of the Canadian people is an overt act of high treason and treason. The RCMP levied war against Canadian for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada and a province which both derives it authority from the people. David Alward is also guilty of high treason and treason. He was elected by the people of New Brunswick to govern them not conspire with the military of a foreign state (United States) and levy war against them.

Any person (including the Prime Minister, Premier, Mayor, RCMP Commissioner) who conspires to levy war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto is guilty of high treason. Any military force (including the RCMP – a paramilitary force) who engages in armed attacks against unarmed civilians is also guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Major fraud perpetrated by our elected officials, the Crown, the RCMP and snake oil and gas companies

Shale gas is a confidence game – a fraudulent scheme, devised by the New Brunswick government (Progressive Conservative Premier David Alward), Canaport LNG (75 per cent owned by Repsol and 25 per cent by Irving Oil Ltd.), shale gas fabricating companies like Southwestern Energy (Houston, TX), Corridor Resources Inc and PetroWorth (headed by former MLA Allan Graham – father of former Premier of New Brunswick Shawn Graham), and Enbridge Gas (the monopolized natural gas pipeline distributor for New Brunswick) for making a quick profit.

Shale gas companies and their corrupt government accomplices have and are engaging in fraud in marketing a product that doesn’t exist in the first place. Shale gas is now being fraudulently marketed by the New Brunswick government because of a law suit and declining revenue for Repsol, Irving Oil Ltd., Corridor Resources Inc PetroWorth and Enbridge Gas. Because of natural gas companies dwindling profits New Brunswickers will be robbed of their life essential and finite supply of potable water and title to their land and poisoned to death from the toxic chemical fracking that forever contaminates their water and air supply.

On April 30, 2012 Enbridge Gas sued the New Brunswick government of David Alward for at least $650 million for what it claims are breaches of agreements and a failure to act in good faith (a.k.a. allow Enbridge Gas to make a profit). 9 months later David Alward formed the Royal District Planning Commission as agents of his government to steal land title and land rights of “private” land owners all across New Brunswick. The Royal District Planning Commission was formed by David Alward to seize “private” land as eminent domain (expropriation). Private land is being stolen by David Alward and delegated to third parties – shale gas exploration companies and the Vatican’s United Nations Organization (UNO – Latin word for one – a.k.a One World Government, a.k.a New World Order). The Royal District Planning Commission is now mapping land for eminent domain for shale gas exploration and at the same time administering an alien (foreign) political agenda – the United Nations Organizations (UNO) Agenda 21 – “Abolition of private property” – another “private” land ownership theft – .

The people of New Brunswick are opposed to shale gas as they have seen the devastating effects water fracking has on the water table of the Sussex NB area. Their potable water supply is consumed and rendered not fit for human or animal consumption. Fracking permanently poisons and contaminates the finite supply of fresh water. David Alward is now the Enbridge Gas’s paid spokesperson for fake shale gas exploration. Enbridge Gas used a threat of law suit to bribe NB Premier Davaid Alward and his government.

You can’t drill a shale gas well and strike a large pocket of shale gas. Shale gas doesn’t exist. Shale is dirt – to be precise a fine-grained, clastic sedimentary rock composed of mud that is a mix of flakes of clay minerals and tiny fragments (silt-sized particles) of other minerals, none of which is gas or oil. Shale contains zero gas and zero oil. They drill and pour a mixture of water and very toxic chemicals into the drilled wells and fabricate a fake gas called shale gas. The very toxic and life threatening chemical reaction underground causes the bond between the water molecules to break and liquid water is converted into its gaseous state – hydrogen and oxygen.

You can achieve the same effect – cause water to convert to its gaseous state – above ground using no chemicals whatsoever. Electrolysis of water does this using no toxic chemicals whatsoever and very little energy. Unlike shale (dirt) fracking, electrolysis of water creates no pollution – doesn’t contaminate the water, the land or the air. Unlike dirt fracking, electrolysis of water doesn’t trigger earthquakes nor poison our finite supply of drinking water. Anyone can make their own natural gas using electrolysis. This is the reason why the U.S and Canadian state, federal and provincial government are illegally promoting and selling a fuel that does not exist. Because anyone can produce their own natural gas for free governments are wilfully and deliberately committing fraud. Without oil and gas governments cannot enslave their people. That is why governments are conspiring with oil companies and are coactively committing fraud – falsely and fraudulently promoting and marketing a product that does not exist – shale gas.

How can you prove shale gas is a fraud? Cut off the water supply. Turn off the water to shale gas wells and they no longer can “fabricate” this very toxic forged gas. Shale gas can only be fabricated (to concoct in order to deceive) by fracturing water (H2O). The end product is mostly H2S (Hydrogen sulfide) a colorless, very poisonous, flammable gas – a.k.a. shale gas. H2S and oxygen burn with a blue flame but forms and emits sulfur dioxide (SO2) – a major air pollutant which has significant impacts upon human health.

What shale gas really looks like. What investors are wasting their money on – dirt.

Apart from the environmental impact posed by the emissions from burning this toxic cocktail of hazardous chemicals there is the intentional, deliberate and illegal dumping of the very toxic and hazardous fracking slurry. In New Brunswick Canada this toxic slurry in dumped directly into the Bay of Fundy. From there it is carried, with the incoming and outgoing tides, to the coastal shores and tide feed rivers all along New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and U.S. East Coast States. Every day toxic shale gas waste is being pushed ashore by the tides where it contaminates and poisons the water supply for coastal cities and towns like Saint John, Moncton, Dieppe, Riverview, Amherst, Digby, Truro, Yarmouth, Windsor, Saint Andrews, Portland Maine and Boston Massachusetts. This spillage is as toxic as if not more toxic than the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. This is intentional whereas the BP oil spill was an accident. BP was heavily fined and billed for contaminating the water and shores all along the Gulf of Mexico. BP was forced to clean up their mess. No one is being charged, fined, billed or forced to clean up the Shale Gas toxic waste dumping.

The Canadian Criminal Code is extensive in its coverage of corruption of officials of the governments of Canada and the provinces. The following are the primary offences dealing with the bribery of domestic public officials in Canada.

(1) FRAUDS ON THE GOVERNMENT
A bribe made to a public official in Canada to exercise influence or an act of omission in connection with government business is subject to a penalty of up to five years in prison. Section 121 is broad in scope and covers influence peddling. It prohibits bribes to or for the benefit of government officials by or on behalf of those who have dealings with the government. This section does not mention foreign public officials.

(2) BRIBERY OF JUDICIAL OFFICERS, ETC.
Everyone who, “being the holder of a judicial office,” corruptly accepts or gives or offers any money or other avaluable consideration in respect of anything to be done in his official capacity commits bribery. This offence is punishable by imprisonment for up to fourteen years. Section 119 covers the acceptance by or giving of bribes to holders of judicial offices or members of Parliament or of a provincial legislature.

(3) BRIBERY OF OFFICERS
Under Section 120, anyone who offers or accepts a bribe to a justice, police commissioner, peace officer, public officer, officer of a juvenile court, or employee in the administration of criminal law to facilitate the commission of an offence is guilty of an indictable offence. The punishment is imprisonment for up to fourteen years.

Is it just a coincidence that Enbridge Gas dropped its suit against David Alward’s Progressive Conservative New Brunswick government who is now marketing shale gas in New Brunswick for Enbridge Gas or did Enbridge Gas bribe the New Brunswick government and David Alward? If a bribe was offered and Davaid Alward accepted it shouldn’t Davaid Alward be arrested for accepting a bribe?

Short URL: https://presscore.ca/news/?p=9403

19 Comments for “RCMP military forces assault First Nations Canadians to cover up Enviroment Canada raid of Irving Oil Canaport”

PRESS Core
January 25, 2014 - 4:14 PM

The RCMP (a military force for the Crown) were supported by armed U.S. infiltrators on October 17, 2013. E.R.T. members were deployed by the Crown to assault Canadians in support of U.S. interests in Rexton NB.

E.R.T. members became U.S. soldiers/infiltrators when they deployed using military force against Canada/Canadians for the U.S. – SWN – a wholly owned Texas U.S. corporation – on Canadian soil. E.R.T. members displayed no identifying insignia that identified them as Canadian or as RCMP officers.

The definition of infiltrate – “to pass a small number of (soldiers, spies, or the like) into a territory or organization clandestinely and with hostile or subversive intent”. E.R.T. military force members engaged in hostile and subversive acts against Canadians, on Canadian soil for the United States on October 17, 2013.

Assault rifle armed soldiers from E.R.T. were sent into Rexton NB with hostile or subversive intent. They were armed with military assault rifles and they engaged in an armed assault against Canadians. They willfully subverted Canadian laws and guaranteed rights for a country that is not Canada – for the U.S. company SWN.

Also, members of the RCMP falsely claim no snipers were deployed in Rexton, NB. They justify that claim by claiming that no military sniper rifles were deployed or used. It doesn’t matter what type of rifle is used. A sniper is a highly trained marksman. You can use a 22 rifle or any hunting rifle and still be a sniper. When I was trained as a sniper we started off using ordinary hunting rifles with scopes. To make our training more challenging we often were taken out onto Lake Ontario and instructed to hit targets onshore from our bobbing and drifting boat. I only used military sniper rifles at the very end of my training and only to prove that a sniper is only a sniper if he or she can hit a target with deadly accuracy, using any rifle. If you use any rifle to successfully eliminate a human target, in any combat arena, from a distance and stealthily you are a sniper.
PRESS Core
October 21, 2013 - 9:22 AM

What motivated the RCMP and the Crown to unlawfully act in favor of a foreign corporation? Motive was stated in the article above – On April 30, 2012 Enbridge Gas, the sole natural gas distributor (a monopoly) for New Brunswick, sued the New Brunswick government of David Alward for at least $650 million for what it claims are breaches of agreements and a failure to act in good faith (a.k.a. allow Enbridge Gas to make a profit).

Enbridge Gas dropped its suit after David Alward’s New Brunswick government started promoting shale gas.

The province’s energy and mines minister claimed that natural gas extraction from shale gas formations has “transformed the energy marketplace,” noting that New Brunswick has an estimated 80 trillion cubic feet of shale gas resources.

“If used to generate electricity, it could supply all of New Brunswick’s residential, commercial and industrial needs for over 100 years,” New Brunswick Minister of Energy and Mines Craig Leonard said.

Source http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/what-is-fracking-and-why-is-it-so-controversial-1.1505246#ixzz2iMUrGY6w

Did Enbridge Gas bribe the New Brunswick government of Davaid Alward? You be the judge.
PRESS Core
October 21, 2013 - 8:46 AM

http://www.swnnb.ca/about.html#about-us – “In March 2010, the Province of New Brunswick accepted our bid for a licence to search, exploring 1 million hectares (2.5 million acres) in the province. We are committed to invest approximately $47 million CAD in the province.”

Pay close attention to what SWN Resources, a foreign corporation, is stating “the Province of New Brunswick (i.e. Progressive Conservative Premier David Alward) accepted our bid. We are committed to invest approximately $47 million CAD in the province.”

Bribery, by which an official is offered, and may even accept, money or other valuable considerations in exchange for doing or not doing what he is expected to do in fulfilment of his official duties, is almost universally condemned as corrupt. Illegal under the Criminal Code, it carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison for the official, the person guilty of bribing the official, or both.

Bribery is defined as the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of any item of value to influence the actions as an official or other person in discharge of a public or legal duty. The bribe is the “gift” bestowed (commit) to influence the receiver’s conduct, and is distinguished from a true gift which involves no such obligation on the part of the recipient. A bribe may be any money ($47 million CAD), property, preferment, privilege, emolument, object of value, advantage, or any promise or undertaking to induce or influence the action, vote, or influence of a person in an official or public capacity.

The “Corruption Of Foreign Public Officials Act” Section 3 of the Act includes a conspiracy offence, and that therefore the mere existence of the conspiracy to pay a bribe was sufficient to warrant a conviction.

It is not necessary for the court to prove that (i) a bribe was actually paid; or (ii) the foreign public official actually agreed to accept the bribe. Rather, the court must only prove that the accused believed that a bribe was being paid. Thus, unless the decision is reversed on appeal, an agreement between business associates to bribe a foreign official can itself constitute an offence under the Act.
PRESS Core
October 21, 2013 - 8:23 AM

A court injunction is automatically declared void and cannot be enforced because of coercion – the intimidation of a victim to compel the individual to do some act against his or her will by the use of psychological pressure, physical force, or threats.

Coercion is the “crime” of intentionally and unlawfully restraining another’s freedom by threatening to commit a crime, “accusing the victim of a crime”, disclosing any secret that would seriously impair the victim’s reputation in the community, or by performing or refusing to perform an official action lawfully requested by the victim, or by causing an official to do so.

Coercion, as an element of duress, is grounds for seeking the Rescission or cancellation of a contract or deed. When one party to an instrument – a court injunction – is forced against his or her will to agree to its terms the document can be declared void by a court.

Legal precedence – A marriage may be annulled or a separation or Divorce granted on the grounds of coercion. The coercion of small businesses by a cartel to fix prices of particular items supplied to them is a violation of antitrust laws, which are intended to prevent the restraint of competition in commerce. Laws regulating labor-management relations are violated by coercion when the employer coerces employees not to join a Labor Union or when a union representative pressures, uses physical force, or threatens an employee into joining the union.

Coercion is recognized as a defense in prosecutions for crimes other than murder. If an accused can establish that he or she committed a crime as a result of the coercion imposed by another the defendant will be acquitted on the charge as a Matter of Law. The person who coerces another (Crown judge, SWN Resources, Irving Oil, the RCMP) to commit a crime is guilty of the crime committed. The coercer can also be prosecuted for the separate crime of coercion.
Paul W Kincaid, CI, editor of PRESS Core
October 21, 2013 - 8:03 AM

A court injunction is essentially coercion. A coercive remedy by a court judge to force the defendant (First Nations and Canadian people) to do, or to refrain from doing, something to the plaintiff (SWN Resources – a foreign corporation). An injunction backed by the Contempt power is coercion. When issuing this type of remedy, the court (representing another foreign corporation – the Crown – a.k.a. City of London Corporation) commanded the First Nations and Rexton permanent residences protesting Irving Oil shale gas confidence scheme (a fraud) to act, or to refrain from acting, in a certain way. In the event that the defendant (Canadian First Nations people exercising their right to peaceful assembly and association) willfully disobeys this coercive remedy, he or she might be jailed, fined, or otherwise punished for contempt.
PRESS Core
October 21, 2013 - 7:36 AM

Comment submitted from Ottawa Ontario Canada – “Since when does a Provincial court judge have authority to preside over legal matters between two nations? Only the federal courts has jurisdiction over matters between Canada and another nation. SWN Resources Canada is, as Paul Kincaid has pointed out, a U.S. company. Their own website http://www.swnnb.ca/about.html#about-us states this – “SWN Resources Canada, Inc., is a wholly owned subsidiary of Southwestern Energy Company.” Southwestern Energy Company headquarters are in the United States – 2350 North Sam Houston Pkwy E Suite 125 Houston, TX 77032

Also, as stated by Paul Kincaid, a court injunction is an administrative ordnance, not law. The province of New Brunswick does not have authority to enact law. What law did the First Nations people violate that justified the RCMP – a federal “military” police force – to violate First Nations Canadians treaty rights and freedoms? None!

SWN Resources Canada is conducting business in New Brunswick Canada as a “temporary” guest. They are not afforded the same legal rights or privileges as Canadians and First Nations Canadians. First Nations people are “permanent” residences of New Brunswick, Canada. SWN Resources, a wholly owned subsidiary of the U.S. Southwestern Energy Company, does not have the protection of our courts or the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. They are temporary immigrants, subject to Canadian laws. Anyone who is not a Canadian citizen or a Canadian permanent resident who wants to work in Canada must be authorized. Usually that means getting a temporary work permit for Canada.

SWN Resources and every one of its foreign employees working at the Irving Oil shale gas confidence scheme work site in Rexton NB, must have a work permit. If they don’t have work permits, they can be deported and SWN Resources indicted for violating Canadian law – The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (“IRPA”) – in force since June 28, 2002 – a Canadian “law” dealing with misrepresentations made by foreign nationals (SWN Resources) or by other persons (Irving Oil) with respect to applications for immigration status.
PRESS Core
October 20, 2013 - 3:17 PM

All RCMP officers are required to display the first initial and surname of the officer on “all” uniforms while on duty. The RCMP policy and procedure manuals describe how the name tag should be displayed for different situations and uniforms. The name tag cannot be obstructed from view or removed while the officer is performing his or her duties.

A name tag is not visible on the uniform of the alleged RCMP dog handler – a clear violation of RCMP policy and procedure i.e. misconduct.

Police misconduct refers to inappropriate actions taken by police officers in connection with their official duties. Police misconduct can lead to a miscarriage of justice and sometimes involves discrimination.

Types of misconduct include, false confession, false arrest, falsified evidence, false imprisonment, intimidation, police brutality, police corruption, racial profiling, surveillance abuse, off-duty misconduct and violations by officers of police procedural policies.

Now compare the above list to the RCMP actions in Rexton NB on Thursday October17, 2013.
PRESS Core
October 20, 2013 - 2:23 PM

Help those assaulted and arrested by the RCMP by identifying these 2 men dressed in military camouflage. The military can only be used if the Prime Minister imposes the Emergencies Act. The Emergencies Act is an Act of the Parliament of Canada to authorize the taking of special temporary measures to ensure safety and security during national emergencies and to amend other Acts in consequence thereof.

The Emergencies Act requires:

A declaration of an emergency by the Cabinet be reviewed by Parliament and
Any temporary laws made under the Act are subject to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Thus any attempt by the government to suspend the civil rights of Canadians, even in an emergency, will be subject to the “reasonable and justified” test under section 1 of the Charter.

The Emergencies Act was not invoked nor reviewed by Parliament on Thursday October 17, 2010. Therefore, the use of a military force (foreign or domestic – the ERT) in support of the RCMP assault and arrest of First Nations Canadians who were lawfully protesting Irving Oil Shale gas confidence scheme operations in Rexton, NB was unlawful.
PRESS Core
October 20, 2013 - 12:58 PM

J Division Emergency Response Team (ERT) is the special forces (military) arm of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police for the province of New Brunswick. Each Canadian province and territory is assigned a letter designation –

“B” Division Newfoundland and Labrador
“C’ Division Quebec
“D” Division Manitoba
“Depot” Division Regina, Saskatchewan
“E” Division British Columbia
“F” Division Saskatchewan
“G” Division Northwest Territories
“H” Division Nova Scotia
“J” Division New Brunswick
“K” Division Alberta
“L” Division PEI
“M” Division Yukon Territory
National Division National Capital Region
“O” Division Ontario
“V” Division Nunavut Territory

The ERT is a specialized group of highly-trained RCMP members capable of employing specialized weapons (explosives – incendiary devices, flash bangs, fragmentation grenades), equipment, and tactics to resolve (by deadly force, not by negotiation) extremely high-risk situations in the interest of the Crown – City of London Corporation. The ERT also offers consulting services (PR damage control) to protect RCMP officers involved in shootings. Like the United States Special Forces (who are also agents of the Vatican Crown) ERTs operate as a temporary mission force, and are conscripted for “temporary” duty as a “military” unit and levy war against Canadian citizens. Like the US Special Forces ERT members return to their detachments after the illegal mission is complete.

The RCMP ERT not only operate in Canada but overseas, when their illegal “military” service is required by the Crown (Vaticans’s City of London Corporation) or by the Crown’s CEO in Canada – the Prime Minister of Canada – Stephen Harper.

ERT missions include overthrowing foreign state governments, assassinations, protection detail for the Crown, Canadian Prime Minister, NATO officials, the Vatican’s UN, and the unlawful German Roman Catholic Queen of England Elizabeth Saxe-Coburg and Gotha II (all German monarchies were formally abolished – thereafter having no legal authority – in 1919 including the Saxe-Coburg and Gotha monarchy).

ERT members have no allegiance to Canada or Canadians. They wear a mask for a reason – what they do is illegal. The “military” duty they perform, on Canadian soil, subverts Canadian law. Their “military” service is to the Crown – a Corporation (business venture) which was created in 1855 by the Catholic Church.

Section 46 of the Criminal Code of Canada has two degrees of treason, called “high treason” and “treason.”

“High treason
(1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,

(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or

The ERT is the “military” arm of the RCMP. The sole purpose of any military is to wage war. The definition of levies war is “to declare and wage” war. The ERT levies war whenever they deploy and shot and kill any Canadian without lawful authority.

Section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides that:

11. Any person charged with an offence has the right …

(d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;

Murder — criminal organization

Canadian Criminal Code (6.1) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of a person, murder is first degree murder when

(a) the death is caused by that person for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a criminal organization; or

(b) the death is caused by that person while committing or attempting to commit an indictable offence under this or any other Act of Parliament for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a criminal organization.

The Crown (Vatican’s City of London Corporation) is a criminal organization that engages in fraud, false pretense, racketeering, money laundering, tax evasion, influence peddling, bribery, election fraud, …

The Crown has never been elected by the Canadian people. The Crown is not the Queen. The Crown has unlawfully assumed authority in Canada under false pretense. The Crown is a “private” corporation – a for-profit business venture. The Crown represents the Pope’s temporal authority – king of kings and is administered by the City of London Corporation, headed by the Lord Mayor of London.

The ERT conduct “military” operations at the direction of or in association with the Crown. The ERT causes the death of a person for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with the Crown.
PRESS Core
October 19, 2013 - 12:07 PM

Indisputable evidence that military forces were illegally used in Rexton at the First Nations protests against Irving Oil and its shale gas confidence scheme operations.

The RCMP don’t wear combat fatigues in any policing operation on Canadian soil. Even when deployed overseas the RCMP wear dark blue uniforms with a Canadian flag patch and the RCMP insignia not brown to light-tan gradient and lime green blending army combat uniform as seen worn by the person above at the Irving Oil shale gas protests.

RCMP officer filmed in Afghanistan – a war zone

Afghanistan is a very hostile arena and yet they wear navy blue uniforms with a clearly visible Canadian flag patch and the RCMP “military” insignia.

RCMP officers assaulting 2010 Toronto G20 Summit protesters wearing navy blue uniform.
PRESS Core
October 19, 2013 - 11:27 AM

Conclusive photographic evidence of staged vehicle burnings by the RCMP. RCMP set their own vehicles ablaze as a pretext to an assault against peaceful Irving Oil shale gas protesters.

As RCMP patrol car begin to burn no protesters are filmed in sight. All fires start from inside the vehicles. If Molotov cocktails were thrown at them (as falsely claimed by the RCMP) the fires would be ignited on the exterior of the vehicles and flames would be seen on the ground. A Molotov cocktail is a liquid incendiary device. The flaming liquid would be affected by gravity and drip on the ground. If Molotov cocktails were used the exterior of the vehicles would immediately burst into flame not create smoke and then flames from the inside. Also notice that the windows were rolled up on the SUV before flames were seen coming from inside the vehicle. Unequivocal proof that the RCMP set them ablaze using either delayed detonation or remotely detonate incendiary devices.
PRESS Core
October 19, 2013 - 10:07 AM

RCMP or soldier? No RCMP identification arm patch or badge identifying him as an RCMP. All RCMP officers are required to visibly show insignia identifying them as RCMP officers. The man above, seen drawing his sidearm against unarmed protesters – a provocative act – has no RCMP identifying “military” insignia. Other components of his “combat” uniform provides visual evidence that he is a soldier, levying war against Canada and Canadians.

Canadian military forces wear CF Green uniforms on Canadian soil. Canadian snipers wear CF Green uniforms to blend in with the terrain as shown in the image above of a CFB Gagetown NB sniper

Barack Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper (lead a minority government at the time) signed a secret deal in Washington on Friday February 4, 2011 that would illegally allow U.S. forces to infiltrate Canada and carry out policing and military operations on Canadian soil. Harper committed high treason. In Canada, the relevant paragraphs of the Criminal Code of Canada relating to high treason are:

(1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,

(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto;

Levy means to declare and wage war. The military definition of levy is to conscript (draft) troops for service. Harper has illegally drafted U.S. troops for military service in Canada. The illegal secretive deal between Obama and Harper conspires to establish a new border AROUND Canada and the United States. The intention of this border agreement is to begin the work of REMOVING the border between Canada and the U.S. in order to form a new corporate (Crown) controlled America called the North American Union (NAU).

The North American Union (NAU) is an economic union of Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The concept is loosely based on the European Union.
Paul W Kincaid, CI, editor PRESS Core
October 18, 2013 - 3:32 PM

$toxic shale gas fracking warning$
Need unequivocal proof that shale gas is very toxic and threatens the water table? Does the toxic warning and danger signs at this shale gas fracking waste site convince you? Yes we can see the plastic membranes containing the very toxic chemical waste but these waste pits are built to allow the very toxic waste to “evaporate” into the atmosphere. As with rain, what goes up eventually comes down, saturating our land with undisclosed toxic chemicals and poisoning the water that all living things require to survive.

Here is more evidence

In the above image you can actually see the toxic waste evaporating. The very toxic vapor later falls back to earth as very toxic acid rain or snow. As you can see there are no adequate barriers around this toxic dump site to prevent wildlife, pets and livestock from drinking from it and being killed.

Liquid natural gas (propane) is pumped into a new shale gas well to deceive investors, creditors and the public.

8 LNG (propane) tanks and several Liquid propane gas pumping rigs can be seen at this shale gas well drilling site. Liquid propane is the trade secret they’ve been hiding. Shale gas doe not exist. Shale is 100% sedimentary rock – 0 gas.

Water is a fundamental resource for human and economic welfare and modern society depends on complex, interconnected water infrastructure to provide reliable safe water supplies and to remove and treat wastewater. This infrastructure is vital for human welfare and economic development and it is vulnerable to intentional disruption from war, intrastate violence and, of more recent concern, shale gas bioterrorism.

Bioterrorism is terrorism involving the intentional release or dissemination of biological agents. These agents are bacteria, viruses, or toxins, and may be in a naturally occurring or a human-modified form.

A bioterrorism attack is the deliberate release of viruses, bacteria, toxins or other harmful agents used to cause illness or death in people, animals, or plants. These agents are typically found in nature, but it is possible that they could be mutated or altered to increase their ability to cause disease, make them resistant to current medicines, or to increase their ability to be spread into the environment. Biological agents can be spread through the air, water, or in food. Shale gas terrorists tend to use toxins because they are extremely difficult to detect and do not immediately cause illness or death. Shale gas fracking is bioterrorism – the deliberate release of toxins or other harmful agents knowing that that the toxins used can cause illness or death in people, animals, or plants.
PRESS Core
October 18, 2013 - 3:01 PM

SWN Resources Canada, Inc., is a wholly owned subsidiary of the U.S. Southwestern Energy Company – headquarters in Houston Texas. SWN is fraudulently misleading Canadians by falsely claiming be a Canadian company from 633 Main, Moncton, NB E1C 9X9. SWN Resources is committing fraud – representation with intent to deceive and with the knowledge that it is false. SWN Resources (a wholly owned U.S. corporation) is also violating protected trademark laws by unlawfully using the name Canada. SWN Resources is illegally using the protected mark Canada to deceive and defraud Canadians and New Brunswickers.

Fraud
380. (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or

(b) is guilty

(i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or

ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction,

where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

Fraud is a criminal offense. A court injunction is not. SWN is breaking Canadian laws not the First Nations people.
PRESS Core
October 18, 2013 - 8:54 AM

Irving Oil is involved in another cover up of another heinous crime. Irving Oil was held liable by the Transportation Safety Board in the Lac-Mégantic train derailment. The Washington Post reported on September 11, 2013 that “Irving Oil may face fines over mislabeled crude oil on Lac-Mégantic train“. Irving Oil Co. could be facing some hefty fines after it was determined the crude oil contained in the sabotaged railcars in the Lac-Mégantic derailment, in which 47 people died, was mislabeled and more flammable than reported by Irving Oil. “It’s our understanding that according to Canadian regulations, the importer of products into Canada would have that obligation to ensure that all the requirements of [the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act] are being applied,” said Donald Ross, the lead TSB investigator into the Lac-Mégantic disaster.
PRESS Core
October 17, 2013 - 11:27 PM

The RCMP, the Crown (City of London Corporation) and the Progressive Conservative Party of David Alward and Stephen Harper are also guilty of terrorism.

Five police vehicles were set ablaze by the RCMP themselves using remotely detonated incendiary devices. As you can see in the image above there are no protesters in the vicinity of the burning police vehicles. No Molotov cocktail were seen or filmed thrown at any of the police vehicles before they burst into flames. The fires all started from inside the parked vehicles. The fires were all deliberately started by the RCMP to frame the peaceful protesters.

The RCMP (a paramilitary force of the Crown with access to explosives) used the same tactic during the 2010 G20 Summit in Toronto. They drove Metro Toronto Police cars to the vicinity of a peaceful protest (miles away from the G20 security perimeter), parked them in the middle of the street, then abandoned them and set them ablaze remotely.

The RCMP involved in the unlawful attacks against the peaceful protesters in Rexton stated that they are also investigating suspected explosive devices at the scene. They are using the placement of their own explosive incendiary devices to frame and lay false charges against the First Nations Canadian people they illegally attacked and arrested for exercising their Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – freedoms of peaceful assembly and association.

Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the section of the Constitution of Canada that lists what the Charter calls “fundamental freedoms” applying to everyone in Canada, regardless of whether they are a Canadian citizen, or an individual or corporation. These freedoms can be held against actions of all levels of government and are enforceable by the courts. The fundamental freedoms are freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom of thought, freedom of belief, freedom of peaceful assembly, and freedom of association.

Canadian Criminal Code:

431.2. Definitions

431.2 (1) The following definitions apply in this section.

“explosive or other lethal device” means

(a) an explosive or incendiary weapon or device that is designed to cause, or is capable of causing, death, serious bodily injury or substantial material damage; or

83.18 (1) Every one who knowingly participates in or contributes to, directly or indirectly, any activity of a terrorist group for the purpose of enhancing the ability of any terrorist group to facilitate or carry out a terrorist activity is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.

83.19 (1) Every one who knowingly facilitates a terrorist activity is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

Facilitation

(2) For the purposes of this Part, a terrorist activity is facilitated whether or not

(a) the facilitator knows that a particular terrorist activity is facilitated;

(b) any particular terrorist activity was foreseen or planned at the time it was facilitated; or

83.01 “terrorist activity” means
(b) an act or omission, in or outside Canada,

(i) that is committed

(A) in whole or in part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause, and

(B) in whole or in part with the intention of intimidating the public, or a segment of the public, with regard to its security, including its economic security, or compelling a person, a government or a domestic or an international organization to do or to refrain from doing any act, whether the public or the person, government or organization is inside or outside Canada, and

(ii) that intentionally

(A) causes death or serious bodily harm to a person by the use of violence,

(B) endangers a person’s life,

(C) causes a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or any segment of the public,

(D) causes substantial property damage, whether to public or private property, if causing such damage is likely to result in the conduct or harm referred to in any of clauses (A) to (C), or

(E) causes serious interference with or serious disruption of an essential service, facility or system, whether public or private, other than as a result of advocacy, protest, dissent or stoppage of work that is not intended to result in the conduct or harm referred to in any of clauses (A) to (C),

and includes a conspiracy, attempt or threat to commit any such act or omission, or being an accessory after the fact or counselling in relation to any such act or omission, but, for greater certainty, does not include an act or omission that is committed during an armed conflict and that, at the time and in the place of its commission, is in accordance with customary international law or conventional international law applicable to the conflict, or the activities undertaken by military forces of a state in the exercise of their official duties, to the extent that those activities are governed by other rules of international law.
Paul W Kincaid, CI, editor of PRESS Core
October 17, 2013 - 8:22 PM

An armed attack by David Alward’s Progressive Conservative government, the Crown’s (City of London Corporation) courts and the RCMP is an armed attack against Canada – an act of war. The First Nations people are the true landowners of occupied Canada. The RCMP is a paramilitary force. They are a military force illegally enforcing martial law for a foreign entity that has no legal or governing authority in Canada – the Crown – the “private” corporation “City of London Corporation”. A Constitional Monarchy is defined as martial law.

The First Nations people gave Canada its name. Canada is their home, their land, their country. The name Canada comes from the word meaning “village” or “settlement” in the Saint-Lawrence Iroquoian language spoken by the inhabitants of Stadacona and the neighbouring region near present-day Quebec City in the 16th century.

Another contemporary meaning was “land.” Jacques Cartier and Claude de Pontbriand (my ailing and New Brunswick government abused 83 year old mother Jacqueline (Pontbriand) Kincaid of Woodstock NB was named after them) were the first European immigrants to use the word “Canada” to refer not only to the village of Stadacona, but also to the neighbouring region and to the Saint-Lawrence River.

In other First Nations languages, the words for “town” or “village” are similar: the Mohawk use kaná:ta’, the Seneca iennekanandaa, and the Onondaga use ganataje.

Today the First Nations’ Canada includes all land from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean and from the Canada/U.S. border to the Artic Ocean.

Because Canada is internationally recognized as the country (land) of the First Nations people and it is an occupied territory the First Nations people are protected person.

Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.

ARTICLE 49

Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.
Paul W Kincaid, editor of PRESS Core and 12 year resident of Rexton New Brunswick
October 17, 2013 - 7:53 PM

The First Nations people (Canadians citizens) who were arrested or a victim of the RCMP assault can now charge Southwestern Energy (Houston, TX) with a serious criminal offense:

“Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act”

“threats to the security of Canada” means

(b) foreign influenced activities (SWN fracking) within or relating to Canada that are detrimental to the interests of Canada and are clandestine or deceptive or involve a threat to any person,

(c) activities within or relating to Canada directed toward or in support of the threat or use of acts of serious violence against persons or property for the purpose of achieving a political, religious or ideological objective within Canada or a foreign state, and
PRESS Core
October 17, 2013 - 7:44 PM

The suspected explosive devices found at the scene were brought in by the U.S. military forces on scene. Investigators, not the RCMP, are now trying to determine if the explosives were intentionally dropped (planted evidence intended to frame First Nations) or accidentally. The smuggling of explosives or explosive devices into Canada is a serious criminal offense. A violation of the “Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act”

“threats to the security of Canada” means

(a) espionage or sabotage that is against Canada or is detrimental to the interests of Canada or activities directed toward or in support of such espionage or sabotage,

(b) foreign influenced activities within or relating to Canada that are detrimental to the interests of Canada and are clandestine or deceptive or involve a threat to any person,

(c) activities within or relating to Canada directed toward or in support of the threat or use of acts of serious violence against persons or property for the purpose of achieving a political, religious or ideological objective within Canada or a foreign state, and

(d) activities directed toward undermining by covert unlawful acts, or directed toward or intended ultimately to lead to the destruction or overthrow by violence of, the constitutionally established system of government in Canada,

but does not include lawful advocacy, protest or dissent, unless carried on in conjunction with any of the activities referred to in paragraphs (a) to (d).