Obama signs unconstitutional and therefore illegal executive order to steal private property.
Corruption, World news Thursday, March 22nd, 2012
On March 16, 2012 Obama assumed once again to have the authority to enact legislature. Obama claims to have the Constitutional authority to unilaterally passed into law the “National Defense Resources Preparedness Act”. This executive order is “completely without merit.” Obama has no such authority under the supreme law of the United States – the Constitution of the United States. Any law that contradicts the Constitution is invalid and therefore illegal and shall not be enforced by any agency of the United States government.
Article I of the Constitution states “all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” The House and Senate are equal partners in the legislative process—legislation cannot be enacted without the consent of both chambers.
Article 1 clearly grants legislative authority to the elected representative of the United States people – the Congress. The following opening statement by Barack Hussein Obama in regards to the executive order “NATIONAL DEFENSE RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS” is deemed illegal by the Constitution of the United States.
“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2061 et seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:”
“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution” is clearly a false statement of facts – a fraudulent statement. Obama has no such authority invested in him by the Constitution of the United States.
This executive order is an illegal attempt by Barack Hussein Obama to unlawfully steal any and all private property of the United States people.
PART II – PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS
Sec. 201. Priorities and Allocations Authorities. (a) The authority of the President (Article I of the Constitution – “all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” …. legislation cannot be enacted without the consent of both chambers.) conferred by section 101 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071, to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts or orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, and to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate (to take something for one’s own use, typically without the owner’s permission – to steal) to promote the national defense, is delegated to the following agency heads:
(1) the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;
(2) the Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy;
(3) the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources;
(4) the Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation;
(5) the Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; and
(6) the Secretary of Commerce with respect to all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials.
Furthermore, the laws of the United States of America also prohibits BO from doing what he intends on doing with his illegal (theft of private property) executive order. The law of the United States of America that makes BO’s executive order illegal is 18 USC § 654 – Officer or employee of United States converting property of another
“Whoever, being an officer or employee of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, embezzles or wrongfully converts to his own use the money or property of another which comes into his possession or under his control in the execution of such office or employment, or under color or claim of authority as such officer or employee, shall be fined under this title or not more than the value of the money and property thus embezzled or converted, whichever is greater, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; but if the sum embezzled is $1,000 or less, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”
18 USC 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law
“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.”
The Constitution of the United States
Fourth Amendment – Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Fifth Amendment – due process, double jeopardy, self-incrimination, eminent domain.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Ninth Amendment – Protection of rights not specifically enumerated in the Constitution.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Tenth Amendment – Powers of States and people.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
By the authority of the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama’s executive order – NATIONAL DEFENSE RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS – is hereby declared nulled and void.
All military personnel and law enforcement personnel have an obligation and a duty to only obey Lawful orders and indeed have an obligation to disobey Unlawful orders, including orders by the president that do not comply with the Constitution of the United States. The moral and legal obligation is to the U.S. Constitution and not to those who would issue unlawful orders, especially if those orders are in direct violation of the Constitution.
Even the president is legally obligated and bound by oath to comply with the Constitution of the United States. The oath of office for the President is specified in the Constitution (Article II, Section 1):
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Short URL: https://presscore.ca/news/?p=5856
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html
Why did Obama sign this unconstitutional order? He is preparing to launch another unprovoked war. A war that the US people don’t want. A war that the Congress hasn’t authorized. A war that top US military brass don’t want and are opposing Obama. A war that will impose martial law in the United States. Obama is giving himself unconstitutional dictatorial powers over the United States people. .
The Huffington Post summarised polling of Israeli public opinion: Nearly two-thirds of Israelis “strongly” or “moderately” oppose an Israeli strike on Iran without U.S. cooperation, according a new poll released by Tel Aviv University’s Guttman Center. …Approximately 70 percent of Israelis believe such an attack would be ineffective in “stopping Iran’s nuclearization for a substantial time” and approximately 60 percent think that Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak is underestimating in his assessment that an Iranian retaliatory strike will cause about 500 Israeli casualties.
The Constitution was written to prevent any abuse of it. The name of the “NATIONAL DEFENSE RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS ACT” was written in all capital letters. This automatically invalids the order.
The basis behind the creation and use of all capital letters names is done to create “fabricated legal names” or “fictional (an imaginative creation or a pretense that does not represent actuality but has been invented) legal names” such as “NATIONAL DEFENSE RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS ACT”. Fabricated legal names are then used to fabricate additional illegal names such as “THE PATRIOT ACT”, “NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT”, or “THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT”.
“Fictions” arise from the law, not the law from fictions. Fabricated or fictional legal names originate from any judicial/governmental actor that wishes to create them, regardless of whether he/she/it is empowered by law to do so. However, a law can never originate from a fictional foundation that doesn’t exist.
The federal government is not only created by Constitution of the United States, but is also bound to operate within the guidelines of Constitutional due process. Any purported law that does not originate from Constitutional due process is a fictional law without validity. Thus, the true test of any American law is its basis of due process according to the organic US Constitution. Was it created according to the lawful process or created outside of lawful process?
US laws like the “NATIONAL DEFENSE RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS ACT”, “THE PATRIOT ACT”, “NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT” (a bill of attainder), or “THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT” were “fabricated” outside of lawful process and are therefore invalid – a fictional law without validity.