The Hague Conventions addressed the rules of law for any armed conflict. The very first Hague law stresses peaceful settlement of disputes, going to great lengths to prevent war through very specific procedures intended to reach a diplomatic solution to any national and/or international disagreement. Arbitration, Committees of Inquiry, neutral mediators and what can be described as a 30-day “time out” are all called upon in order to avoid war. It is only once all of these steps have been exhausted that it is acceptable to declare war. And then, a formal declaration is necessary. All undeclared wars and surprise attacks are illegal under international law.

The right of belligerents (the United States, and NATO countries) to adopt means of injuring the enemy is not unlimited. (Hague IV). It is illegal to misuse a white flag, a symbol of surrender or truce (Hague IV); it is illegal to kill or injure (including torture) a person who has surrendered; it is illegal to attack a defenseless person or place; it is illegal to attack a building that is being used as a hospital.

National and cultural symbols are protected. Armed forces may not use the enemy’s flag, uniform or insignia, nor the symbol of the Red Cross, for their own purposes. The enemy’s property is not to be taken or destroyed unless it’s critical to military operations. Structures dedicated to art, science and charitable missions, as well as any historic or cultural objects, are off limits, unless, of course, they are being used for military operations.

There is a ban on weapons whose purpose is to maximize pain and suffering: no poisoned weapons; no bullets that do additional damage once inside the body; no chemical or biological weapons.

Chemical and biological warfare is addressed by both the Hague and Geneva laws. Declaration II of The Hague Peace Conference made deadly gas attacks illegal back in 1899. The 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibited lethal gas and bacterial methods of warfare. The Geneva Convention of 1972 reiterated this prohibition by outlawing the “development, production and stockpiling” of these weapons and insisting on the elimination of any already in existence.

Genocide — the systematic destruction of a particular group of people (the Taliban was the political party of the Afghan people until the US and NATO overthrew them in an undeclared, unproved armed attack) based on nationality or ethnicity — is prohibited by a 1948 treaty dedicated solely to its prevention and the punishment of those who commit it.

Sick, wounded or surrendering lawful combatants must “in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria” (Geneva I). It is illegal to kill, mutilate, torture or perform “biological experiments” on a wounded or sick person or surrendering lawful combatant. It is illegal to treat this person in a “humiliating and degrading” manner. It is illegal to hold this person hostage.

The rules of war is body of customs, practices, usages, conventions, protocols, treaties, laws, and other norms that govern the commencement, conduct, and termination of hostilities between belligerent states or parties.

Frequently violated and sometimes ridiculed, the rules of war have evolved over centuries. They distinguish nations whose armed forces respect some minimal standard of human decency from terrorists, marauders, and other outlaws who use illegal and unrestricted methods of warfare to achieve political, economic, or military objectives.

The point of these rules is not only to distinguish combatants from noncombatants but to distinguish conventional soldiers from hired assassins (CIA), spies (CIA, MI5), and mercenaries (Black Water aka Xe) who circumvent the customs of war in order to accomplish an end that could not be achieved by regular armed forces. Because assassins, spies, and mercenaries do not comply with the rules of war, their captors need not either. Similarly, combatants who attempt to flout the rules of war by disguising themselves in civilian clothing (CIA, MI5, Black Water) or enemy uniforms may be treated as ordinary criminals.

They may also be treated as “enemy” or “unlawful” combatants, a kind of purgatory between civilian status and prisoner-of-war-status. In response to the September 11th attacks in 2001, the United States launched a war of terrorism, which included a specific military operation (an undeclared war and unprovoked armed attack) against the Taliban government in Afghanistan and members of the CIA created al Qaeda terrorist organization conducting terrorist operations for the United States from there. During this ongoing illegal conflict, the U.S. and NATO military forces have captured thousands of Taliban and resistance fighters (Ronald Regan called them freedom fighters), hundreds of whom were allegedly not complying with the rules of war, failing to wear uniforms with insignia clearly displayed, failing to carry their weapons openly, and failing to organize themselves in units subject to a hierarchical chain of command.

The North Atlantic Treaty
Washington D.C. - 4 April 1949

The Parties to this Treaty reaffirm their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and their desire to live in peace with all peoples and all governments. They are determined to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. They seek to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area. They are resolved to unite their efforts for collective defence and for the preservation of peace and security. They therefore agree to this North Atlantic Treaty

The United States White House and NATO officials have argued that members of the Afghan freedom fighters, the Taliban, and other alleged terrorists do not qualify as lawful “enemy combatants” and therefore are not accorded rights under the Geneva Conventions, the internationally accepted rules on conduct during wartime that govern the treatment of detainees, among other things. The US government and NATO say terrorists do not enjoy legal protections because they do not follow any rules of war: They fight for no nation-state (the Taliban and other Afghan resistance groups are fighting to liberate their country, Afghanistan, from the armed occupation by US and NATO forces), they target innocents (the US and NATO target and attacks civilians on a daily bases both on the ground and with unmanned armed drones), they wear no insignia (US, Canada and NATO forces wear no clearly visible insignia whatsoever while on patrol or during combat - in direct violation of the rules of law - failing to wear uniforms with insignia clearly displayed) , and they disguise themselves as civilians (the US Black Water mercenaries, the CIA and MI5 all wear civilian clothing). The entire NATO forces do not qualify as lawful “combatants” and therefore are not accorded rights under the Geneva Convention. International law and NATO’s own treaty declares NATO as the enemy and “unlawful” combatants in Afghanistan.

Can you give a person cancer? If cancer in animals can be caused by injecting them with cancer viruses and bacteria, it would certainly be possible to do the same with human beings! In 1931, Cornelius Rhoads, a pathologist from the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, purposely infects human test subjects in Puerto Rico with cancer cells; 13 of them died. Though a Puerto Rican doctor later discovers that Rhoads purposely covered up some of the details of his experiment and Rhoads himself gives a written testimony stating he believes that all Puerto Ricans should be killed, he later goes on to establish the U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Fort Detrick Maryland (origin of the HIV/AIDS virus, the Avian Flu virus and the Swine Flu / A-H1N1 virus), Utah and Panama, and is named to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, where he begins a series of radiation exposure experiments on American soldiers and civilian hospital patients.

The answer to the question - Can you give a person cancer - is yes. After nearly 80 years of research and development there is now a way to simulate a real heart attack and to give a healthy person cancer. Both have been used as a means of assassination. Only a very skilled pathologist, who knew exactly what to look for at an autopsy, could distinguish an assassination induced heart attack or cancer from the real thing.

Is death by heart attack, burst aneurysm, of cerebral hemorrhage a “natural cause”? Not if government agencies have found a way to influence your heart rate, blood pressure, or vascular dilatation. Neurological research has found that the brain has specific frequencies for each voluntary movement called preparatory sets. By firing at your chest with a microwave beam containing the ELF signals given off by the heart, this organ can be put into a chaotic state, the so-called heart attack. In this way, high profile leaders of political parties who are prone to heart attacks can be killed off before they cause any trouble. Jack Ruby died of cancer a few weeks after his conviction for murder had been overruled in appeals court and he was ordered to stand trial outside of Dallas — thus allowing him to speak freely if he so desired. There was little hesitancy in Jack Ruby killing Lee Harvey Oswald in order to prevent him from talking, so there is no reason to suspect that any more consideration would have been shown Jack Ruby if he had posed a threat to people in the US government who had conspired to murder the president of the United States - John F Kennedy.

Matt Simmons, an oil industry expert, was assassinated for turning whistleblower over the Obama administration coverup of the BP Gulf Oil Spill. Investment banker Matt Simmons, who died suddenly, was an energy industry insider and presidential adviser whose profile soared when he wrote that Saudi Arabia is running out of oil and world production is peaking. Simmons, 67, died at his vacation home in Maine. An autopsy by the state medical examiner’s office concluded Monday that he died from accidental drowning “with heart disease as a contributing factor.”

His 2005 best-selling book, Twilight in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy, brought him a wider audience. The book argued that Saudi Arabia vastly overstated the size of its oil reserves and that the world was on the verge of a severe oil shortage as the largest oil fields become depleted. This revelation is backed up by Iran. Iran knows the Middle East oil supply is quickly drying up and for that reason it is now focusing on building nuclear reactors. Once the oil runs out Iran will be the only country in the Middle East that will be energy self-sufficient. All of the other Middle Eastern countries, including Saudi Arabia will become Third World impoverished states.

Former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic was also assassinated. He was found dead in the detention centre at The Hague tribunal. Mr Milosevic faced charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity for his alleged central role in the wars in Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo during the 1990s. He also faced genocide charges over the 1992-95 Bosnia war, in which 100,000 people died.

Milosevic wrote a letter one day before his death claiming he was being poisoned to death in jail. An autopsy verified his claim as it showed that Milosevic’s body contained a drug that rendered his usual medication for high blood pressure and his heart condition ineffective, causing the heart attack that led to his death.

Former MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson told reporters that he saw documents in 1992 that discussed assassinating Milosevic by means of a staged car accident, where the driver would be blinded by a flash of light and remote controlled brake failure enacted to cause the crash. This exact same technique was utilized for real in the murder of Princess Diana.

If Milosevic was murdered, who would ultimately be responsible? NATO. Why NATO? Because, though the ICTY (or ‘Hague Tribunal’) presents itself to the world as a UN body, NATO officials have themselves made clear, in public, that it really belongs to NATO. NATO appointed the prosecutors, and the judges who ruled out investigating any war crimes accusations against NATO. It follows that Slobodan Milosevic, who was a prisoner of the Hague Tribunal’s Scheveningen prison when he died, was a prisoner of NATO. NATO had both motive and opportunity to kill him.

In March 2002, Milosevic presented the NATO controlled Hague tribunal with FBI documents proving that both the United States government and NATO provided financial and military support for Al-Qaeda to aid the Kosovo Liberation Army in its war against Serbia. This didn’t go down too well at the Pentagon and the White House, who at the time were trying to sell a war on terror and gearing up to justify invading Iraq.

During Milosevic’s trial for war crimes NATO alleged that the Serbs had committed a massacre of Albanian civilians in the Kosovo town of Racak. Evidence presented in the court showed that NATO’s claim was a hoax. This is especially embarrassing because the allegation of a massacre at Racak was the excuse that NATO used to begin bombing the Serbs on 24 March 1999 (the carpet bombing were done by the United States Air Force -authorized by then president Bill and Hillary Clinton). Then NATO claimed that the Serbs had supposedly been murdering 100,000 Albanian civilians. However, NATO’s own forensics reported that they could not find even one body of an Albanian civilian murdered by Milosevic’s forces. The failure to find any bodies eventually led to NATO’s absurd claim that the Serbs had supposedly covered up the genocide by moving the many thousands of bodies in freezer trucks deep into Serbia (while Bill Clinton was carpet bombing the place) without leaving a single trace of evidence. But the Hague tribunal showed these accusations to be entirely fraudulent as well.

Milosevic made several speeches in which he discussed how a group of shadowy internationalists had caused the chaos in the Balkans because it was the next step on the road to a “new world order.”

During a February 2000 Serbian Congressional speech, Milosevic stated, “Small Serbia and people in it have demonstrated that resistance is possible. Applied at a broader level, it was organized primarily as a moral and political rebellion against tyranny, hegemony, monopolism, generating hatred, fear and new forms of violence and revenge against champions of freedom among nations and people, such a resistance would stop the escalation of modern time inquisition. Uranium bombs, computer manipulations, drug-addicted young assassins and bribed of blackmailed domestic thugs, promoted to the allies of the new world order, these are the instruments of inquisition which have surpassed, in their cruelty and cynicism, all previous forms of revengeful violence committed against the mankind in the past.”

Evidence linking Milosevic to genocides like Srebrenica, in which 7,000 Muslims died, was proven to be fraudulent. In fact, Srebrenica was a ‘UN safe zone’, yet just like Rwanda, UN peacekeepers deliberately withdrew and allowed the massacre to unfold, then blamed Milosevic. Milosevic’s exposure of UN involvement in the Srebrenica massacre was another reason why tribunal transcripts were heavily edited and censored by NATO, and another contributing factor for NATO to murder him while he was in their custody.

NATO’s Hague Tribunal was clearly a kangaroo court whose sole purpose was to convince ordinary people all over the world that NATO’s destruction of Yugoslavia was justified. Since NATO failed to show this in its own court (a total absence of evidence did make this difficult), there is indeed a powerful NATO motive to murder Milosevic - to prevent his acquittal. In this way, NATO can continue to claim that Milosevic was guilty, and nobody would begin to look into the mountain of evidence that showed that it was NATO leaders (particularly US president Bill Clinton) who committed war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in Yugoslavia.

So many people have been done in by cancer at a convenient time in history that it is now time to ask the question “who is assassinating people by giving their target cancer or inducing a massive heart attack”? Who ordered the hits and why?

Mr. Charles Senseney, a CIA weapon developer at Fort Detrick, Maryland, testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee in September 1975 where he described an umbrella poison dart gun he had made. He said it was always used in crowds with the umbrella open, firing through the webing so it would not attract attention. Since it was silent, no one in the crowd could hear it and the assassin merely would fold up the umbrella and saunter away with the crowd. Video footage of the assassination of John F Kennedy shows this umbrella gun being used in Dealey Plaza. Video evidence of the events of November 22, 1963 shows that the first shot fired on the fateful day had always seemed to have had a paralytic effect on Kennedy. His fists were clenched and his head, shoulders and arms seemed to stiffen. An autopsy revealed that there was a small entrance wound in his neck but no evidence of a bullet path through his neck and no bullet was ever recovered that matched that small size.

Charles Senseney testified that his Special Operations Division at Fort Detrick had received assignments from the CIA to develop exotic weaponry. One of the weapons was a hand-held dart gun that could shoot a poison dart into a guard dog to put it out of action for several hours. The dart and the poison left no trace so that examination would not reveal that the dogs had been put out of action. The CIA ordered about 50 of these weapons and used them operationally. Senseney said that the darts could have been used to kill human beings and he could not rule out the possibility that this had been done by the CIA.

A special type of poison developed for the CIA induces a heart attack and leaves no trace of any external influence unless an autopsy is conducted to check for this particular poison. The CIA revealed this poison in various accounts in the early 1970s. The CIA even revealed the weapon that fired those darts that induces a heart attack at a congressional hearing. The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target. The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. A former CIA agent disclosed that the darts were made of a frozen form of the liquid poison. She disclosed that the dart would melt within the target and would only leave a very tiny red dot at the entry point - the same type of small entrance wound that was found during the autopsy of John F Kennedy.

For over 50 years assassinations have been carried out so skillfully as to leave the impression that the victims died from natural causes. Details of some of the techniques used to achieve this were brought to light in 1961 when professional KGB assassin Bogdan Stashinskiy defected to the West and revealed that he had successfully performed two such missions. In 1957 he killed Ukrainian emigré writer Lev Rebet in Munich with a poison vapor gun which left the victim dead of an apparent heart attack. In 1959, the same type of weapon was used on Ukrainian emigré leader Stepan Bandera, although Bandera’s death was never fully accepted as having been from natural causes.

Among the witnesses, important people and conspirators who might have been eliminated by induced heart attack and cancer are: Jack Rudy (died of a stroke due to an undiagnosed form of aggressive cancer, just weeks after he agreed to testify before Congress about the JFK assassination), Clay Shaw, J. Edgar Hoover, Earlene Roberts (Oswald’s land-lady), Marlyn Monroe, Slobodan Milosevic, Kenneth Lay (former CEO of ENRON - the largest political campaign contributor of Gorge W Bush and Dick Cheney), Matt Simmons, Mark Pittman (a reporter who predicted the financial crisis and exposed Federal Reserve misdoings. Pittman foght to open the Federal Reserve to more scrutiny), Elizabeth Edwards (suddenly diagnosed with cancer while her husband was campaigning against Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for the presidency of the United States. During a campaign speech to the Council on Foreign Relations in May 2007, Edwards called the War on Terrorism a slogan that was created for political reasons and that it wasn’t a plan to make the United States safe. He went further to compare it to a bumper sticker and that it had damaged the US’s alliances and standing in the world.), … enter here the names of every politically outspoken person, whistle blower or witness who died unexpectedly of a heart attack or who quickly died of an incurable cancer

One the greatest tragedies resulting from the Sept 11, 2001 attack on the WTC towers in New York City is the plight of the heroic rescue workers who saved thousands of lives on that day. A study published in April of 2010 found that about 20% of the 14,000 responders have permanent lung damage. A large number of those 9/11 first responders has contracted blood cancers at an unusually young age, and top doctors suspect the disease was triggered by an unprecedented “synergistic mix” of toxins at the World Trade Center site. These growth of these cancers among Ground Zero workers, and others, are consistent with exposure to radiation contamination.

The WTC Medical Monitoring Program is now studying a group of Ground Zero workers, including cops, construction workers and volunteers, suffering from cancers such as leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma. The blame has been placed on the ‘toxic dust’ clouds which engulfed the area surrounding the towers. While there is little question that particulate matter such as pulverized concrete impacted the health of those who were standing in the blast radius of the falling towers, the huge number of responders who contracted illnesses including rare cancer types is more akin to those who survived the nuclear bomb detonations in Nagasaki and Hiroshima Japan.

How does this comparison make any sense? The 9/11 Commission Report officially stated that the city of New York was hit with planes, not a nuclear missile. As it turns out there is a dirty little secret omitted from the 9/11 Commission Report. The World Trade Center Towers were brought down by explosions containing a large quantity of uranium - from underground nuclear detonations. Experts have always said that the towers were intentionally collapsed by controlled demolitions. Structural engineers from around the World have said that it is impossible to cause a collapse of a skyscraper from a fire caused by an aircraft impact. There have been several major high rise fires throughout the World before 9/11 and since then and none have caused a collapse of the structure. The engineers have even used the Empire State building catastrophe as proof of their claim.

On the foggy morning of Saturday, July 28, 1945, a U.S. Army B-25 bomber smashed into the north side of the Empire State Building. The majority of the plane hit the 79th floor, creating a hole in the building eighteen feet wide and twenty feet high. The plane’s high-octane fuel exploded, hurtling flames down the side of the building and inside through hallways and stairwells all the way down to the 75th floor. The plane exploded within the building. One of the engines and part of the landing gear hurtled across the 79th floor, through wall partitions and two fire walls, and out the south wall’s windows to fall onto a twelve-story building across 33rd Street. The other engine flew into an elevator shaft and landed on an elevator car. Some debris from the crash fell to the streets below, sending pedestrians scurrying for cover, but most fell onto the buildings setbacks at the fifth floor. Still, a bulk of the wreckage remained stuck in the side of the building. After the flames were extinguished and the remains of the victims removed, the rest of the wreckage was removed through the building. The plane crash killed 14 people (11 office workers and the three crewmen) plus injured 26 others. Even though the B-25 bomber had impacted the building at a high rate of speed and the high octane fuel exploded and inflamed 3 floors of the inside of the building the structural integrity of the Empire State Building was not affected.

More recently, on Feb. 12, 2005 in Madrid, the Windsor Tower burned for over 20 hours, which led to a fire stronger and hotter than that in the WTC, but even the collapses of the Windsor Tower caused by the very strong and long-enduring fire were minimal and limited to the upper floors.

These known facts explains a great number of anomalies present in the analysis of how the World Trade Center Towers fell. One of the common questions that has puzzled many independent observers was how jet fuel, which burns in open air at about 300 deg C, was able to compromise the integrity of steel, which melts at 1,000 deg C. The presence of depleted uranium at Ground Zero settles this conundrum.

According to Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York City on September 11, 2001, the fires raged at ground zero ‘for a hundred days’ after the towers were hit. The presence of a high-energy compound such as uranium helps explain how this was sustained long after the jet fuel would have been gone and how the health of so many 9/11 first responders was devastated.

On August 29, 1949, the USSR detonated its first nuclear fission bomb, dubbed “Joe-1” by the U.S. It produced the same type of mushroom cloud and a base surge as witnessed by billions of people around the World on the morning of September 11, 2001.

Storax Sedan was a shallow underground nuclear test conducted in Area 10 of Yucca Flat at the Nevada National Security Site on July 6, 1962 as part of Operation Plowshare, a program to investigate the use of nuclear weapons for mining, cratering, and other civilian purposes. The 100 kiloton Sedan nuclear bomb was buried at a depth of 635 feet. The detonation produced a mushroom cloud and base surge - typical of shallow-buried nuclear explosions. The cloud is highly contaminated with radioactive dust particles and produces an intense local fallout.

Experts, both military and civil engineers, have concluded that the only plausible explanation for what happened to the World Trade Center Towers on September 11, 2001 is that a small underground nuclear detonation was involved in the collapse of the WTC towers. The over ten million degrees of heat created by a thermonuclear detonation sublimated all water within the concrete of the structure in a moment. Water explodes extremely quickly into 24-fold volume and totally pulverizes the concrete. Burning radiation is absorbed in steel so quickly that steel heats up immediately over its melting point 1585 °C (approx. 2890 °F) and above its boiling point around 3000 C (approx. 5430 °F). Super hot groups of steel pillars and columns, torn from wall by pressure wave, are sublimated. They immediately turn into a vaporized form, binding heat as quickly as possible. Vertical bursts are not possible for a gravitational collapse or for cutting charges which are used horizontally but on the morning of September 11, 2001 we saw exactly that - a nuclear detonation.

Doctors have been urged to be more cautious in offering cancer treatment to terminally-ill patients as chemotherapy often does more harm than good. “If cancer specialists were to admit publicly that chemotherapy is of limited usefulness and is often dangerous, the public might demand a radical change in direction—possibly toward unorthodox and nontoxic methods, and toward cancer prevention. …The use of chemotherapy is even advocated by those members of the establishment who realize how ineffective and dangerous it can be.” - Ralph W. Moss, author, The Cancer Industry

The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) found that more than four in ten patients who received chemotherapy towards the end of life suffered potentially fatal effects from the drugs, and treatment was “inappropriate” in nearly a fifth of cases. In a study of more than 600 cancer patients who died within 30 days of receiving treatment, chemotherapy caused or hastened death in 27 per cent of cases, the inquiry found.

Former chemotherapy patient Anne explains in the book, The Cancer Prevention Diet: “My mind rebelled at the thought of another six months of that poison. On several occasions, the doctor couldn’t perform chemotherapy treatments on me because my white blood cell count was dangerously low. I promised my body I would not undergo any further chemotherapy treatments.”

Anne’s account reflects the feelings of all too many cancer patients who have suffered through months of often debilitating chemotherapy. The side effects that chemotherapy patients feel and others see – the extreme nausea and vomiting, the hair loss, the weight loss – are indicative of the intense havoc that chemotherapy is causing within the body. According to the Life Extension Foundation, chemotherapy drugs are “cytotoxic,” meaning that “they kill cells that are extremely active.” Cancer cells are, of course, extremely active. However, so are the cells of the hair and the immune system, for example, which accounts for chemotherapy’s destructive side effects.

As if these side effects are not enough, cancer therapy commonly includes surgery and radiation, both of which have their own dangers and side effects. As Professor Null writes in his Complete Encyclopedia of Natural Healing, “The mainstream medical establishment often prescribes mastectomy, radiation and chemotherapy to treat cancer, an approach that has been described as a slash-and-burn strategy.” The treatment for breast cancer is unfortunately often the general rule among cancer treatment – cut off the affected organ, poison the body with chemotherapy and then harm the body even more with radiation.

In Get Healthy Now, Professor Null describes one woman’s experience with mainstream medicine’s approach to breast cancer treatment: “Three days later, she had her breast lopped off. That was followed up with lots of chemotherapy. Her hair fell out and she vomited 24 hours a day. She couldn’t keep any food down. Then they did radiation and her skin burnt up and two of her ribs broke.” He concludes, “Most people don’t know how dangerous radiation is. I had seen enough. I wouldn’t touch any of that medicine with a 10-foot pole.” Surgical removal of the cancerous body part also has its own aftereffects, of course, requiring not only the normal recovery after any surgery, but also coping with the psychological effects of having a body part removed.

As cancer patients suffer from the side effects of chemotherapy and other methods of mainstream cancer treatment, the fact remains that according to many medical practitioners, these treatments are unnecessary and sometimes do more harm than good. In response to chemotherapy’s many side effects, Dr. Atkins says in Burton Goldberg’s Alternative Medicine, “Only in situations in which chemotherapy is proven to be effective and curative would I recommend it. In general, this might be testicular cancer.”

Many people also think that surgery can sometimes do more harm than good: Biopsy, for example, may in fact spread cancer cells, according to Professor Null. Furthermore, the most extreme example of unnecessary cancer therapy – treatment for false positive cancer diagnoses – is more common than we’d like to believe, according to Critical Condition authors Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele.

One of the major drawbacks of chemotherapy treatment for cancer is that it not only attacks cancer cells, but other fast-growing, healthy cells, including those found in the bone marrow and other parts of the immune system. So being so destructive why continue to use these types of treatments? The answer is “Money”.

There is big money in cancer research and treatment. The survival of the cancer research society depends on no cure being found against cancer. They rely on the $billion income from the government in the form of research grants and from the $billions in donations from the public. Society is so desperate for a cure that they unwittingly hand over $billions to a group of people who have no intention of ever finding a cure. What reason would they have to simply take the money and not find a cure? If there was a cure found, or at least declared found, every money hungry research lab around the World would close down. If there was a cure for cancer the radiology wing of every hospital around the World would close down. If there was a cure pharmaceutical companies (the modern day dope dealers) would be put out of business.

Since 1946 it is said that the American Cancer Society has invested over $2 billion in research trying to find a cure. Cancer spending in 1990 was $27 billion. In 2008, this figure increased over 3 times to a whopping $90 billion. This massive increase in spending is caused by the rapidly increasing costs of new drugs (drugs manufactured for prolonged treatment only - not a cure), robotic surgeries and radiation procedures (life threatening treatment - not a cure), and the increasing number of people being diagnosed with an fraudulently declared incurable cancer.

$90 billion is being wasted on research and treatment because cancer has many cures - all natural, all safe, all available for as little as a few dollars, and all have been proven time and again. If, as many people believe, mainstream cancer treatment is ineffective and always harmful to the body as a whole, then what is the alternative? Alternative cancer cures are presented and validated every day. Articles are published every day declaring many safe and effective alternative cancer treatments and cures. Articles with headlines like:

Science proves that garlic kills cancer cells,
Curry Powder Ingredient Kills Cancer Cells,
In Tests, Vitamin D Shrinks Breast Cancer Cells - ABC News,
Curry spice ‘kills cancer cells‘ - BBC,
How spicy foods can kill cancers - BBC,
Substance in breast milk kills cancer cells, study suggests,
Nano-protein pair kill cancer cells,
Grape extract kills cancer cells - BBC,
Scientists use salmonella bug to kill cancer cells - Reuters,
Human cells secrete protein that kills cancer cells: Study,
Vitamin C confirmed to kill cancer cells. ….

What are all these articles saying? They are stating that cancer can easily be beaten. They are stating the obvious fact that there are many cures for cancer - all of them natural. These articles all suggest and then verify that cancer cells are very weak, far weaker than healthy cells. It is very easy to kill cancer cells if you can create the right environment. Research scientists have known for decades that your body is itself a cancer cell killer. A naturally produced protein found in the human body is able to zero in on and kill cancer cells, without the use of chemotherapy drugs. The health care industry knows this. The pharmaceutical companies knows this. Even your government knows this. The only people who don’t know this is you. If you did, you or someone you know wouldn’t be dying of cancer.

Although not many people know it, pasteurizing milk destroys essential nutrients in the milk. How?

Pasteurizing milk destroys beneficial bacteria along with the bad ones and destroys enzymes essential for nutrient absorption. Pasteurizing milk destroys all its phosphatase; this is essential for the absorption of calcium, and calcium works with Vitamin D, not only available through sunshine but is an essential nutrient in raw cream. Nature packaged a superb design for human sustenance in milk as it comes from the cow with all original essential nutrients — so long as it is not pasteurized. Heating any raw food destroys the active enzymes, so lipase (an enzyme unique to milk and needed to complete digestion of fats) is blasted along with many other essential nutrients that pasteurization destroys. The sale of raw milk (milk that hasn’t been pasteurized) is actually outlawed in some states. Does it make sense to ban the sale of RAW MILK but other products known to cause death are still legal? Cigarettes and alcohol have killed millions yet the sale of cigarettes and alcohol has not been banned. A handful of people became mildly sick from drinking milk that wasn’t properly handled by a milk processing plant and as a result all raw milk sale is now banned.

Pasteurized milk is like synthetic vitamins - has no nutritional value. So why drink it at all? A synthetic form of Vitamin D is added to pasteurized milk to try and give it a nutritional value. They added 40 IU of synthetic vitamin D to the dead milk. The recommended daily vitamin D intake levels set for adults age 50 and over is 400 IU. That would mean, in order to get the recommended amount of vitamin D an adult would have to consume 10 glasses of pasteurized milk each and every day. That many glasses would cause a very severe case of the runs (diarrhea) - each and every day. Wait just a minute. That was the reason why the FDA forced all milk producers to pasteurize their milk in the first place or be banned from selling their milk. They stated that the E. coli - short for Escherichia coli - a bacteria (germ) in raw milk caused severe cramps and diarrhea and to prevent this they ordered all raw milk to be pasteurized.

When cows are stored in sick environments, they become sick and produce sick milk requiring pasteurization so it won’t kill you. Modern factory farming reduces dairy cattle to barely living milk-producing sacs. They are pain-wracked, live in fear, are starved for relationships with their fellows, pumped full of antibiotics and other system-changing drugs. Obviously, they can produce only sick milk.

Because milk from factory-raised sick cows is sick, it’s pasteurized so it won’t kill you—at least, not quickly. It will, though, kill you slowly - from malnutrition and disease and illnesses caused by malnutrition.

Natural raw milk is a living food. It contains enzymes, which help convert it to other healthy foods, like cheese. Instead of going rancid like pasteurized milk, raw milk sours, providing us with a huge range of delicacies, like French cheeses, Dutch cheeses, British cheeses, Wisconsin cheeses, yogurt, and kefir.

Yes, raw milk is full of bacteria. But it is full good bacteria, bacteria that is essential for nutrient absorption. Think about, what is it about yogurt that’s so good for you? It’s probiotics, which is a cute word meaning good bacteria. Did you know that pasteurized milk also contains loads of bacteria? The difference is that it’s all dead, so none of the good bacteria is there for you. What you’re eating in pasteurized milk and yogurt made from pasteurized milk are millions of bodies of dead bacteria, both good and bad. Pasteurization doesn’t filter or get rid of bacteria it kills it. Pasteurization doesn’t filter out the dead bacteria either. So the next time you drink a glass of pasteurized milk think about what you are eating - a glass full of dead matter. You might as well as gather up all of the dead bugs and flies that are in your home, put them in a glass and drink it. Bon Appetit.

One out of every eight Americans gets it, and 47% of those who reach 85 years of age have it. Up to now Alzheimer’s was a disease without a remedy. Sure, there are nutritional or drug based substances that slow the symptoms, but If nothing else killed you Alzheimer’s would over a period of time.

Up until recently Alzheimer’s patients took medications just to be able to dress, bathe, use a phone, and other basic necessary functions by themselves a while longer. A team of researchers from the University of California, Irvine, has announced the discovery of a true cure for Alzheimer?s. The best part of this cure is it’s cheap and widely accessible. The cure is vitamin B3, nicotinamide, or more commonly referred to as niacinamide.

Nicotinamide is one of the two principal forms of the B-complex vitamin niacin. The term niacin is used as a collective term to refer to both nicotinamide and nicotinic acid, the other principal form of niacin, or the term is used synonymously with nicotinic acid. Nicotinamide and nicotinic acid have identical vitamin activities, but they have very different pharmacological activities.

Vitamin B3 facilitates the processes involved with metabolizing fats, proteins and carbohydrates. In addition, over 50 enzymes are able to function properly because of this one vitamin. Niacin, as it’s also called, is one of the more stable vitamins and as such it is able to resist oxidation, heat and alkalies.

Vitamin B3 (Niacin) has an interesting effect on the arteries. First, this vitamin helps the arteries widen, which enables blood to circulate more easily. Also, because Niacin lowers the body’s bad (LDL) cholesterol levels, it helps prevent plaque from forming and building-up on artery walls. The result is improved blood flow and even better, a reduced risk of heart attack.

Vitamin B3 plays also a major role in keeping the body’s nervous system, digestive tract and overall mental well-being functioning properly. Healthy skin requires a regular supply of this vitamin. And finally, it’s also required in order to produce various hormones including progesterone and testosterone.

Like the other B vitamins, Vitamin B3 is water soluble, meaning that it’s easily absorbed in water and needs to be constantly resupplied. The body does have the ability to produce a very small quantity of Niacin, but this amount is not enough to meet daily intake requirements. The rest must be supplied either by food or by supplementation.

Kim Green, Ph.D., director of the team at the University of California, Irvine, bought a year’s supply of Vitamin B3 and stirred it into the drinking water of forty lab mice, half of which were specially bred to get Alzheimer’s disease.

After treating the mice for only four months, he discovered what should have been front-page news in every city in the world. “Cognitively, they were cured,”? said Dr. Green. They performed as if they’d never developed the disease.

Vitamin B3 is associated with an increase in “microtubules,” which carry information inside brain cells. “Microtubules are like highways inside cells. What we’re doing with [Vitamin B3] is making a wider, more stable highway,” one of the researchers said. “In Alzheimer’s disease, this highway breaks down. We are preventing that from happening.”

All the researchers in the study were both astonished and excited. Rarely do you hear researchers using the word “cured,” but that’s exactly what happened.

At the end of the study, the diseased mice that were treated with niacinamide performed just as well in memory tests as healthy mice! The niacinamide not only protected their brains from further memory loss, but incredibly, it also restored lost memory function.

Niacinamide has been used extensively for many purposes for over 60 years, and its safety is well-known. In fact, two of the “basic books” about niacinamide therapy were written in the 1940s by William Kaufman, Ph.D, M.D., a psychiatrist and exceptionally thorough clinical researcher. In 1943, Dr. Kaufman wrote his first book on the nutrient, titled The Common Form of Niacin Amide Deficiency Disease: Aniacinamidosis. William Kaufman discovered that all of the symptoms of neurodegenerative diseases “disappeared or…improved considerably” with the use of niacinamide.

Vitamin B3 also has a history of improving another severe mental health problem - schizophrenia. Abram Hoffer, M.D., Ph.D. (considered to be the “father” of orthomolecular psychiatry) started using niacinamide to treat schizophrenia in 1950. According to Dr. Hoffer’s figures, schizophrenic individuals who started taking niacinamide, along with vitamin C, have a 66 percent or higher chance of recovery.

Niacin is found in more animal products than plant products. Good sources of this vitamin include organ meats (kidney, liver), lean meats, pork, prawns, and even milk from a cow.

Some of the other sources include seeds and almonds, rice bran, wheat products, beans, green vegetables, turnips, carrots, celery and Brewers Yeast.

Vitamin B3 research provides more proof that mother Earth’s vitamins and nutrients, are more effective (and much cheaper) than toxic pharmaceutical drugs (that have many side effects) in treating and curing all diseases, viral infections and illnesses.

Dallas Morning News
The Electric Auto that almost triumphed: Power Source of ‘31 car still a mystery
by A.C. Greene,
January 24th, 1931

It is a mystery car once demonstrated by Nikola Tesla, developer of alternating current, that might have made electrics triumphant.

Mr. Tesla got into the driver’s seat, pushed the two rods in and stated, “We now have power”. He put the car into gear and it moved forward! This vehicle, powered by an A.C. motor, was driven to speeds of 90 m.p.h. and performed better than any internal combustion engine of its day! One week was spent testing the vehicle. Several newspapers in Buffalo reported this test. When asked where the power came from, Tesla replied, “From the ethers all around us”. (Ethers is Electromagnetic radiation. Radio waves is electromagnetic radiation which has the lowest frequency, the longest wavelength, and is produced by charged particles moving back and forth) Several people suggested that Tesla was mad and somehow in league with sinister forces of the universe. He became incensed, removed his mysterious box from the vehicle and returned to his laboratory in New York City. His secret died with him!

Or did it?

How did ethers power the vehicle? The owner of FuelReducer and editor of this website, Paul W Kincaid, has been trying to answer that question since 2005, when he first read about it in an old magazine he found in a neighbor’s barn. According to data from the 5 years of investigation there is one very plausible explanation as to how ethers powered the car. Research data indicates that Tesla’s mystery box was nothing more than a simple regenerative vacuum tube radio wave receiver. A type of electronic instrument that receives radio frequencies from thin air and amplifies the received weak radio signal. This simple receiver makes use of vacuum tubes, resistors and wires (the exact same electronic components used by Tesla) to increase the power and/or amplitude of a signal. The main component of Tesla’s “Power Receiver” is the vacuum tube - also called a valve amplifier. The simplest valve amplifier was invented by John Ambrose Fleming while working for the Marconi Company in London in 1904 and named the diode, as it had two electrodes. The diode conducted electricity in one direction only and was used as a radio detector and a rectifier. The diode was most likely used as an instrument to convert AC (alternating current is when the movement of electric charge periodically reverses direction) of RF to DC (direct current is the flow of electric charge is only in one direction) In 1906 Lee De Forest added a third electrode and invented the first electronic amplifying device, the triode, which he named the Audion. This additional control grid modulates the current that flows between cathode and anode.

Tesla used valve amplifiers to increase the power or amplitude of the ordinary radio waves that were received by the 6-foot vertical antenna rod that was fitted into the rear section of the car. An antenna is a transducer that transmits or receives electromagnetic waves. In other words, Tesla used the antenna mounted on the rear of the car to convert the freely available electromagnetic waves called radio waves into electrical current.

Tesla bought vacuum tube diodes which are vacuum tubes (valve amplifiers) with two electrodes; a plate and a cathode. A diode is a two-terminal electronic component that conducts electric current in only one direction while blocking current in the opposite direction (the reverse direction). Thus, the diode can be thought of as an electronic version of a check valve. This unidirectional behavior is called rectification, and is used to convert alternating current (AC or the power that comes from your home’s electrical outlets) to direct current (DC or the power from a battery). AC power circuit is a sine wave. Audio and radio signals carried on electrical wires (such as an antenna) are also examples of alternating current.

Tesla used the vacuum tubes, wires and assorted resistors to build a radio wave receiver/amplifier 24 inches long, 12 inches wide and 6 inches high, with a pair of 3-inch rods 1/4” in diameter sticking out. The pair of rods that Tesla pushed in were used to close (complete) the circuit - like an on/off switch. The rod ends were most likely the positive and negative leads (connections) between the car antenna and and the radio wave receiver/amplifier. By pushing them into the box containing the radio wave receiver/amplifier the connection was completed allowing the radio waves that were received from the air by the antenna to flow through the receiver/amplifier to the electric motor. This is like you would do when you plugged an electric guitar into an amplifier. Like the electric guitar amplifier the signal generated by striking a cord (string) of a guitar would travel from the guitar through the wire connecting the guitar to the amplifier and into the amplifier where the barely audible tone would then be amplified. An electric guitar without an amplifier is essential an air guitar until it is plugged into an amplifier. The amplifier amplifies the sound wave generated by striking the strings of the electric guitar. That is basically how Tesla was able to amplify and convert the invisible electromagnetic radiation called radio waves into electricity to power the AC motor in the 1931 Pierce-Arrow. The word electricity comes from the fact that current is nothing more than electrons moving along a conductor, like an antenna, that have been harnessed for energy. Tesla used an antenna (an electrical conductor) and an amplifier to harness and then amplify energy.

Why hasn’t anyone revealed this 80 year old secret? Because Tesla built a free energy device. A device that would threaten the oil industry, the nuclear energy industry and the hydro electric power monopoly. A device that would bankrupt every oil refinery in the World. A device that would literally put an end to Global warming. Disease and illnesses caused by pollution from oil and gas products would simply disappear. If Tesla’s invention was put into mass production the World would never have been involved in wars in the Middle East and Afghanistan, the Exxon Mobil and BP oil spills would never have occurred, and millions of people would still be alive and very healthy today.

Would you buy a gas electric hybrid that delivered 200+ mpg (miles per gallon)? Sure you would, if the price was right. Is 200 mpg even possible? The answer was yes in 1933 and the answer is yes in 2010. In 1933 Charles Nelson Pogue made headlines when he drove a 1932 Ford V8, 200 miles on a gallon of gas during a demonstration conducted by The Ford Motor Companies in Winnipeg, Manitoba using his super-carb system. In fact, many people attested to these mileage claims as The Pogue Carb went into production and was sold openly. However, one of the crucial factors of these systems is the use of “white” gasoline, which contained no additives. It was soon after this much publicized test that oil companies started adding lead to the fuel. Lead is an anti-catalyst that rendered Pogue’s carburetor as inefficient as a regular carb.

Why did the oil companies act quickly to contaminate pure gasoline with lead and later other additives? Because Charles Nelson Pogue was awarded a US patent based on the design and the verified demonstration of its function in 1933, sponsored by the Ford Motor Companies. US Patent # 2,026,798 was awarded to Charles Nelson Pogue on January 9, 1936. The patent states: “This invention relates to carburetors suitable for use with internal combustion engines and in an improvement on the carburetors shown in my Patents # 1,938,497 and # 1,997, 497. ” Pogue’s patent describes in great detail the workings of his high mileage vapor carburetor. This carburetor was developed and patented to improve the efficiency of internal combustion engines by atomizing and vaporizing liquid fuel before it is injected into the combustion chambers. By atomizing and vaporing liquid fuel higher fuel efficiency is achieved and far less and almost near zero emissions is produced.

It is an often a misconception that most vehicles on the road today already burn gasoline vapors in their internal combustion engines. The fact of the matter is, gasoline powered vehicles today burn finely divided particles or droplets that are sprayed from the carburetor or fuel injectors, into the engine cylinders.

This is a very wasteful process of converting gasoline or diesel to energy. Maybe 20-30 % efficiency at most. It has been known and demonstrated for 60 or more years that burning gasoline vapors will give easily 5 times the mpg and near zero emissions. Actually if the vapors are heated to the necessary temperature of 450 degrees F, the gasoline vapors are actually fractionalized by catalytic cracking and converted to smaller light molecular hydrocarbons, methane and methanol.

The problem with today’s internal combustion engine technology

Gas prices are going up, more cars are on the road, and more cities are experiencing extreme vehicle exhaust pollution. With todays technology this was to be expected. Even with the manufacturing of gas electric hybrids the problem still and will continue to exist. Why? Because the gas part of the gas electric hybrids is what gives the vehicles any kind of usefulness as the batteries are quickly depleted in electrical charge and can go no farther than 50 kilometers. The gasoline part is still very fuel inefficient. Even though they are sold as green vehicles they still emit high levels of CO2 emissions. The reason why they still are fuel inefficient and major polluters is because the internal combustion engines of the hybrids are still injecting the same old finely divided particles or droplets of gasoline and not gas vapor. The development of Electric Vehicles, Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Fuel Cell vehicles are not proceeding at a fast enough pace to make a dent cleaning up the air in most cities. The new Hybrid Electric Vehicles are a sham as they cannot travel any practical distances on electric power. Gasoline is still needed in large quantities and they still create a lot of pollution because they still haven’t changed how the gasoline is consumed. The introduction of fuel injectors didn’t reduce the amount of fuel entering the combustion chamber nor did they atomize and vaporize the fuel so that it would burn completely. Instead the fuel injectors injects more fuel into the combustion chamber by injecting the fuel under high pressure. The manufacturer designed it that way and that is the only reason why all “return-type” fuel injection systems have a return fuel line - to return the excess of fuel being injected into the engine back to the fuel tank. Take two of the newest hybrid trucks that are sold by the government owned GM (Guzzling Motors) today. Both the 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid and 2010 GMC Yukon Hybrid having fuel economy ratings of only 20 mpg city and highway. Both are hybrids so you would assume that they would be more fuel efficient. The only green on these hybrids is the name hybrid that is glued to these gas guzzling and CO2 emitting trucks. Neither have any increase in fuel efficiency, in fact they have worse fuel efficiency than 1987 vehicles that had fuel economy ratings of 22.1 miles per gallon.

The solution

Ok now what? How do we increase the fuel efficiency of the vehicles on our roads and achieve near zero emission? The simplest solution is to manufacture vapor fuel systems, like Charles Nelson Pogue did. His patent is available for all to review, even the automobile manufacturers. I am sure with all of the high priced engineers on the payroll of GM, Ford and Chrysler one of them can use Pogue’s patented idea and incorporate a vapor fuel system into the design of all of their vehicles. I am sure one of their engineer geniuses can even come up with an after market fuel vaporizing conversion system that any auto mechanic could install on the millions of vehicles already on the road. If Charles Pogue could design, patent and equipped a Ford V8 coupe that reportedly got over 200 MPG so can the more advanced engineers employed by GM, Ford and Chrysler. Will the Big 3 actually do this and give us consumers a vehicles with much higher fuel efficiency and near zero emissions? Highly unlikely. If they won’t design and produce more fuel efficient and clean vehicles then why not take matters into our own hands and finance and build a cleaner and more fuel efficient vehicle - or at least a fuel vaporizing conversion system that can be attached to all of their vehicles. Why not design and build a true green hybrid vehicle. A 200+ mpg gas electric hybrid. Impossible? I’ve already shown you that it isn’t impossible and Charles Nelson Pogue is the proof. Have you heard about another Canadian inventor who has come up with a design for a gas electric system that can be easily built and installed in both cars and trucks. The design by FuelReducer is a hybrid conversion system that uses a brushless AC electric motor, an induction coil, a potentiometer, a single 12 volt automotive battery and a very small gasoline or diesel powered engine. Will it actually work? We may never know because development and testing takes a large amount of money. The Big 3 have a lot of money but they won’t invest any of it towards building a more fuel efficient and near zero emission vehicle. The little guys, like FuelReducer, have the design and know how to build them but no money to manufacture a high mileage and near zero emission fuel system, let alone a whole vehicle. That is the main reason the Big 3 are not the least bit threatened by any new technology emerging that will improve the inefficiency of their polluting vehicles. Pogue drastically improved the fuel efficiency of a 1930s Ford V8, over 70 years ago yet none of the Ford vehicles on the road today have fuel efficiencies higher than 45 mpg. The 2011 Ford Fusion has a fuel efficiency of only 41 city/34 hwy (EPA estimated ). You would think Ford or one of the other Big 3 would have hired Pogue to improve on his design and at least one of the Big 3 would have build their vehicles with Pogue’s carburetor. Since your vehicle doesn’t get 200 mpg or even 100 mpg you know they didn’t. Instead Ford bought Pogue’s patent and shelved it. When the money he got from Ford (to buy the patent) ran out Pogue went to work making oil filters for the motor industry.

A brilliant idea was wasted and today we are still driving around in fuel inefficient and polluting cars and trucks. Green hybrids doesn’t mean environmentally friendly. Green refers to the huge amounts of green paperbacks you are going to have to fork over to GM, Ford and Chrysler to reduce CO2 emissions and save the planet. In case you haven’t noticed, the price tag for all of their Hybrids are nearly double the price of their strictly gasoline vehicle. That is on purpose. Why? People will only buy what they can afford. With the high cost of living and our low paying jobs, we will always choose the lower price. The poor and middle class can’t afford the price tag of a hybrid and the Big 3 auto makers know that. The Big 3 have purposely overpriced their hybrids so that you and I are forced to buy their cheaper polluting gas guzzlers.

While investigating the WHO and UN role in the biological weapons attack called the A-H1N1 (Swine Flu) pandemic of 2009, criminal intelligence (CI) agents from Canada and the US have stumbled upon a covert and sinister plan to kill off as many as 3 billion people by food malnutrition. The organization that is responsible for preparing for the murder of 3 billion people is called the Codex Alimentarius Commission. It was established in 1963 by the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Their officially stated purpose is to develop international food standards to protect consumer health and to facilitate fair trading practices in foods. Today, there are 181 member governments including Canada. CI agents have uncovered the real purpose of this WHO / UN organization - to murder 3 billion people. How will they murder some 3 billion people?

It was Henry Kissinger, who in 1974 conceived the idea of the food genocide to control world population – less people to consume world resources – more for the rich nations (elites) to exploit the sources of the world to satisfy their greed. On December 10, 1974 the US National Security Council under Henry Kissinger prepared a classified study ‘National Security Study Memorandum 200 (Full text of NSSM 200 (governmental source - pdf file)) – which falsely claimed that the worldwide population growth poses a great threat to US national security interests.

US Air Force weapon of mass destruction military installation called HAARP - live cam image from November 29, 2010. Red arrow points to military truck parked at installation and lights are clearly shown to be on at each of the trailers. HAARP is active and is responsible for causing recent earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, heat waves and monsoon rainfall that caused major flooding.

Classified UN documents reveal that 1 billion people will be killed by starvation as UN trade agreements and WHO health moratoriums will forbid any country from selling and exporting any food to targeted regions for depopulation. Starvation of 3 billion people has already begun as the United States has been using its weapon of mass destruction called HAARP to control, alter and intensify the weather of the targeted nations. This past summer HAARP was used to create a heat wave in Russia, resulting in the near complete destruction of its crops. Also this past summer the US used HAARP to cause the massive flooding in China and Pakistan - an attempt to wipe out the crops of China and Pakistan resulting in the mass starvation of their populations. 2 billion more will be murdered by diseases and illnesses associated with malnutrition from crop destruction, pasteurization and irradiation. The Codex Alimentarius Commission will be responsible for causing disease and illness from malnutrition by implementing the 2 latter killing instruments. The Codex Alimentarius Commission has begun this process by labeling the life sustaining nutrients (vitamins, minerals and enzymes) in our foods as poisons. Now that nutrients are classified as poisons they have been given the authority by the United Nations to eradicate all nutrients in our foods. They have already begun the eradication process by pasteurizing (exposing to high heat) and irradiating (exposing to radiation) all of our food. Milk was the first to be targeted for eradication as milk is the most important life sustenance on Earth. It is packed full of vitamins, minerals and enzymes. All essential for keeping us healthy and alive. Next was eggs. Another very important food that keeps us very healthy and alive.

With the recent false declarations of E. coli contamination in fruits and vegetables the member nations of The Codex Alimentarius Commission have been ordered to pasteurize or irradiate all fruit and vegetables. Why? Pasteurization and irradiation destroys all of the nutritional value of our food. These processes don’t eliminate the microorganism they claim they are killing in our food. It kills the organisms and everything else including the vitamin, mineral and enzyme content of our food. Furthermore pasteurization and irradiation doesn’t clean or filter out the bad organisms in our food it just kills them and when we drink or eat pasteurized or irradiated foods and beverages we are consuming the dead, rotting and disease and illness causing bodies of the organisms. Because all of the vitamins, minerals and enzymes have been destroyed by pasteurization and irradiation your body can’t stop or fight off the disease and illnesses caused by consuming the dead and rotting organisms.

Who is behind this mass murder of 3 billion people?

In the investigation of the WHO and UN plans for murdering 3 billion people there is one region of the World that seems to have been exempted. The only region that is not being targeted for mass depopulation are the countries that made up old Europe. Why everywhere else but old Europe. Because, according to information written in the classified UN documents, Canada, the US, China, Russia, Pakistan, the Middle East and Africa are nations populated with people who are considered inferior races. The only superior race of people is the Aryan Race. Adolf Hitler started WWII to reinstate the Aryans as a master race of Indo-Europeans. The Aryans are supposed to be Nordic in appearance and directly ancestral to the Germans. During WWII the Nazi SS officers and soldiers were put in charge of slaughtering all inferior races of people by whatever means possible, including; war, famine, poison, biological diseases and mass executions. Today the UN has been put in charge of slaughtering as many as 3 billion people.

Very few people realize that the UN was created by former high ranking politicians and war criminal officers of Nazi Germany. Even fewer people know that an International organization existed during WWII and it was that League of Allied Nations who were responsible for the defeat of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany. Immediately after WWII the League of Nations was destroyed by the Nazi Germans in retaliation for defeating them in WWII. In its place the Nazi Germans formed the UN. The UN (the negative prefix un means - Opposite of; contrary to: unrest.) was formed to bring about global unrest. Once global unrest was achieved a New World Order governed by “The Four principles” (The Fourth Reich) - * One Leader * One Budget * One Programme and * One Office would be implemented. To have an understanding of the clandestine agenda of the UN you must have an understanding of the meaning of Reich. Reich is the territory or government of a German state, as the Holy Roman Empire (the Vatican), or First Reich , from 962 to 1806; the German Empire, or Second Reich, from 1871 to 1919 (Germany’s WWI); the Weimar Republic, from 1919 to 1933; and the Third Reich, from 1933 to 1945 (Nazi Germany’s WWII). The Nazi formed United Nations launched the “Delivering as One” initiative in 2007 - the Fourth Reich. Today Germany is once again the leader of the new and Fourth Reich. A former Nazi German Youth - Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger ( served the Third Reich for at least 4 years) is now leader of the Vatican - the original or First Reich.

The Nazi war criminals also formed many of the International and national organizations we have today, including NATO (created by commanding officers and ex-multinational conscripts that made up the German Waffen SS army units), the CIA (created by former Gestapo agents to spy on, sabotage, torture and kill agents, military personal and political figureheads of the Soviet Union ), the WHO (created by former Auschwitz death camp scientists and physicians), NASA (created using former Nazi rocket scientists who were smuggled into the US in Operation Paperclip).

Now that our governments have been ordered by the Nazi UN to begin pasteurizing and irradiating every consumable food the only question left to ask is “how much time do we have left before we starve to death from eating?”

A viewer just reminded me of a very important historical fact that relates to this story. I was reminded of the fact that the Royal Family of England, namely Queen Elizabeth II and the House of Windsor, are actually descendants of the German arm of European Royalty - the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family. Due to anti-German sentiment in the United Kingdom during the German Reich World War I, George V of the United Kingdom changed the name of his branch from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to Windsor in 1917. The same happened in Belgium where it was changed to “van België” (Dutch) or “de Belgique” (French). The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha is a German dynasty, the senior line of the Saxon House of Wettin that ruled the Ernestine duchies, including the duchy of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. The House of Wettin is a dynasty of German counts, dukes, prince-electors (Kurfürsten) and kings that once ruled the area of today’s German states of Saxony, the Saxon part of Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia for more than 800 years as well as holding at times the kingship of Poland. Agnates of the House of Wettin have, at various times, ascended the thrones of Great Britain, Portugal, Bulgaria, Poland, Saxony, and Belgium; of these, only the British and Belgian lines retain their thrones today. This historical fact means that Germans rule the United Kingdom, Canada and a host of other Commonwealth Nations. The head of state in Canada is the sovereign or Queen of Canada (a German from the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha) . The Queen’s powers are exercised by the Governor General of Canada except when the Queen is in Canada. The Governor General, like the sovereign or Queen, is not political and remains above politics. That would suggest that Canada and other Commonwealth Nations are servants of the German Reich.

There’s mounting evidence of a link between ingredients in many sunscreens and skin cancer.

The Food and Drug Administration has been sitting on possibly damning data from government research studies since July 2009, Sen. Chuck Schumer revealed in June of 2010.

One study found tumors and lesions developed up to 21% faster in lab animals coated with sunscreen lotions containing certain derivative that’s in most of the 500 most popular sunscreens.

“If the product is doing more harm than good, people have a right to know - and the FDA must take action,” Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters at Hudson River Park.

The regular use of sunscreen lotion might provide some protection from sunburn, but it poses some very serious health risks - for ourselves and the wider environment.

The sunscreen industry is huge - worth billions of dollars annually. It rose to mega-profitability when a link was made between skin cancer and overexposure to the sun in the late 60’s/early 1970’s. Yet the incidence of skin cancer continues to rise even though these products are widely used. Logically, if incidences of skin cancer has continued to rise especially after sunscreen has been widely used for the past 3 decades, then sunscreen must be the reason.

An investigation by the Environmental Working Group of over 1,500 sunscreens and other sun-blocking products currently on the market found that 3 of 5 sunscreens either don’t protect skin from sun damage or contain hazardous chemicals - or both.

Take a look at this partial list of ingredients that can be found in many sunscreen lotions:

Aminobenzoic acid - carcinogen implicated in cardiovascular disease.
Avobenzone - carcinogen
Cinoxate - evidence of skin toxicity
Dioxybenzone - strong evidence of skin toxicity and carcinogen; hormone disruptor and has been found in waterways, soil and air. Has been shown to have a “gender bender” effect in animals
Diazolidinyl urea - carcinogen, endocrine, central nervous system and brain effects, skin toxicity and compromises the immune system
Ecamsule - carcinogenic
Homosalate - endocrine disruption
Methylparaben - interferes with genes
Octocrylene - found to be persistent and bioaccumulative in wildlife, liver issues and carcinogenic
Octyl methoxycinnamate - accumulates in the body, disrupts liver and is a carcinogen
Octyl salicylate - broad systemic effects in animals at moderate doses
Oxybenzone - carcinogen and contributor to vascular disease, may affect the brain and nervous system in animals
Padimate O - carcinogen
Phenylbenzimidazole - carcinogen
Phenoxyethanol - irritant, carcinogen, endocrine disruption
Sulisobenzone - strong evidence of skin toxicity, affects sense organs in animals
Titanium dioxide - carcinogen when in nanomaterial form
Zinc Oxide - bioaccumulative in wildlife, evidence of reproductive toxicity

Does it make any sense that in order to prevent skin cancer, we need to slap on carcinogenic compounds and chemicals that interfere with our immune and reproductive systems and that also pose a risk to the wider environment? Millions of gallons of sunscreen is consumed each year. After application, it doesn’t mysteriously vanish - it winds up either soaking into our bodies and accumulating there or is excreted (into the environment) or washed off; again - into the environment.

Nobody has proven that sunscreen helps protect against melanomas. Researchers have, however, proven that the ingredients used to make the sunscreen are carcinogenic. A carcinogen is any substance, radionuclide or radiation, that is an agent directly involved in causing cancer. In other words, sunscreen is actually causing cancer and other health and environmental issues.

One of the major problems with sunscreen is that in order to be effective (claimed to be effective but never proven) against less serious forms of skin cancer, you need to use a lot of it, and far more often than what the manufacturers recommend and regardless of what the SPF rating is. Why do they advise you that more is better? Profit. The more you lather on the more often you will need to buy another, and another, and another bottle of sunscreen lotion. Cha-Ching

I have never used sunscreen and I’ve worked outdoors 9 hours a day for the past 30 years and I don’t have any cancer or disease of any kind. What about you?

Can vitamin D cure cancer? Surprisingly, the answer is yes. Vitamin D is a powerful hormone that regulates and repairs bodily cells. Vitamin D is needed for optimum functioning of the immune and cardiovascular systems, increases white blood cell production and supports the prostate as well as healthy skin and bones. UVB rays from sunshine is essential to convert cholesterol in skin to vitamin D. The skin cannot produce natural vitamin D without UVB rays. The people who receive $80 billion a year for cancer research knows that and because of this reason they are falsely claiming UVB rays are harmful. In order for them to keep on getting $billions from your government in the form of tax dollars they are telling everyone to lather on layers and layers of clothing and toxic sunscreen to block out the sun’s essential ultra violet light. They want us to cover our Vitamin D producing skin in order to interfere and prevent our body from fighting and destroying cancer cells. The United States Department of Health and Human Services has declared ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun and artificial sources, such as tanning beds and sun lamps, as a known carcinogen (cancer-causing substance). The estimated 2008 cost of cancer care was $228.1 billion - that figure is a very good motive for them to fraudulently claim that UVB rays from sunshine is harmful and cancer causing when in fact UVB rays exposure is essential for the body to produce vitamin D. 20 minutes of UVB exposure is essential for preventing cancer.

If you have adequate amounts of vitamin D in your body, the cancer cells in your body stop growing and dividing uncontrollably, stops invading and destroying other bodily tissues, stops spreading throughout your body, and begins specialization for specific bodily functions.

Also the cancer cells lose their immortality, and begin to die normally. Vitamin D forces cancer cells to behave like normal cells!

The singular most important cause of cancer is vitamin D deficiency. Most, if not all, cancer patients are vitamin D deficient.

What is cancer?

Cancer involves groups of bodily cells growing and dividing uncontrollably, refusing specialization for specific bodily functions, invading and destroying other bodily tissues, and sometimes spreading throughout the body. Most cancers form a tumor, but not all. For example, leukemia (cancer of the blood or bone marrow) doesn’t.

Cancer affects people of all ages, but affects older people more. According to the American Cancer Society, cancer killed 7.6 million people worldwide in 2007!

Cancer is caused by damaged genes within bodily cells. These damages can be caused by tobacco smoke, asbestos fibers, radiation exposure (including from hospital and airport X-rays), fossil fuel, chemicals, or viral infections. Cancer-promoting genetic damages can also be inherited.

Normal cells are programmed to kill themselves if they become damaged beyond repair. Nevertheless, this program is turned off in cancer cells - allowing them immortality!

Basically, cancer cells are immortal “brain-damaged” cells that act crazy, killing normal cells, interfering with normal bodily functions.

Vitamin D

Vitamin D isn’t really a vitamin. Since vitamin D is usually produced by the body’s largest organ, the skin, it’s really a hormone. For a chemical substance to qualify as a hormone, it needs to be produced by one of the body’s organs.

Not only do plants need sunlight to be healthy, humans also need it. Long ago, sunlight exposure was the only way humans got adequate amounts of vitamin D. Most foods are vitamin D-free or contain small traces of it - not enough for best health! The human skin is designed to photosynthesize large amounts of vitamin D from sunlight exposure.

Researchers recently discovered vitamin D deficiencies among the following people:

People spending most of their time indoors,
People regularly covering all their skin with clothing,
People regularly slathering on sunscreen,
People aged 50 and older,
People with excessive body fat,
People with inflammatory bowel disease, and
People living far from the equator. For example, the following cities have high cancer rates: Seattle, Toronto, Boston, London, Dublin, Helsinki, Copenhagen, Berlin, Moscow, and Anchorage.

Also researchers found that dark-skinned people are more susceptible to vitamin D deficiency, because their skin filters out more sunlight than light-skinned people.

Additionally, researchers have discovered that many of the vitamin D deficient people developed medical conditions such as diabetes, osteoporosis, obesity, heart disease, clinical depression, chronic anxiety, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, psoriasis, eczema, high blood pressure, bone softening diseases, chronic pain, muscle weakness, viral infections, polycystic ovary syndrome, and migraine headaches.

In the past, people believed that taking 600 IU of vitamin D daily was enough for good health. Currently, researchers found that adults need at least 4,000 IU of vitamin D daily for therapeutic anticancer effects!

But how much is too much? Doesn’t vitamin D become toxic at high doses? Vitamin D does become toxic at high doses, but it’s much higher than you think. Researchers recently found that to poison yourself with vitamin D, you need to take at least 40,000 IU of vitamin D daily.

So if you have cancer, a strong and safe therapeutic dose of vitamin D in the range between 10,000 IU and 20,000 IU is needed daily.

Where to get adequate amounts of vitamin D?

These days we can no longer rely on our food supply as good sources of vitamin D. Either the soil is contaminated or too nutrient depleted to grow any food of good nutritional value. To make matters worse the FDA is now pasteurizing everything from milk, to eggs, to fruits and vegetables. Heat from pasteurization destroys the last remaining beneficial nutrients in our food. So where can we get an adequate supply of cancer curing Vitamin D? You can buy vitamin D tablets at vitamin and retail stores. It’s more convenient to buy tablets that have the highest dose per tablet. For example, bottles of vitamin D containing 2,000 IU per tablet. So you need to take only five tablets to equal 10,000 IU.

Sunlight exposure is the best way to get adequate amounts of cancer curing Vitamin D, as the body automatically regulates how much Vitamin D it makes from sunlight, and there is the added benefit of controlling cholesterol. Since vitamin D precursors require cholesterol for conversion into the hormone-like vitamin, without adequate sun exposure vitamin D precursors can turn into cholesterol instead of the vitamin.

It is estimated that for each 5% of skin surface exposed, approximately 435 IU of Vitamin D can be manufactured. Just 20 minutes of direct sun exposure to your skin will manufacture 20,000 IU of Vitamin D - enough to prevent and even cure you of cancer. In other words if you don’t have money to buy Vitamin D supplements or your diet doesn’t have enough Vitamin D, turn off your computers, TVs, video games, and go outside. With an adequate amount of daily sunlight exposure, the cancer cells in your body will stop growing and dividing uncontrollably, will stop invading and destroying other bodily tissues, will stop spreading throughout your body, and the Vitamin D produced naturally will begin specialization for specific bodily functions.

As a result of a demonstration project partly sponsored by the United States Environmental Protection Agency in cooperation with the Indianapolis Center for Advanced Research, the City of Indianapolis, Indiana, realized a 34% fossil fuel savings by incinerating sewage sludge. At the same time, sludge throughput was increased 10%. In addition to these proven savings, operational downtime for repairs was reduced, maintenance costs were reduced, and air pollution was reduced. The air pollution reduction allowed Indianapolis to cancel a $3,000,000 construction program for air pollution abatement.

Other cities incinerating sewage sludge in the United States that have initiated the fuel efficient mode of operation have saved even more fuel than Indianapolis. Nashville, Tennessee, reduced its fossil fuel usage 40%; Buffalo, New York, reduced its fossil fuel usage by 47% from design expectations; Hartford, Connecticut, reduced its fossil fuel usage by 51%; and Jacksonville, Florida has reduced its fossil fuel usage by over 50%.

These savings result from installing additional instrumentation and controls (often not required at newer facilities), modifying the incinerator operating methods, and training the operators to operate the facilities more efficiently. At Indianapolis, it cost $20,000 per incinerator for instrumentation and operator training. This was an older plant and required a maximum amount of new controls and instrumentation; however, the payback for this $20,000 was less than three months due to the reduction in fossil fuel use based on an oil price of $0.264 per litre ($1.00 per gallon). In the other cities where instrumentation controls were adequate, the cost for developing the now operating mode and training the operators averaged $75,000 per city.

Sludge is a huge environmental problem all over the world but it doesn’t have to be as we now have the know how and technology to turn this problem into a clean energy solution. Not only does this create a new energy source for all major cities around the World it also cleans up the environment. The more we use sewage sludge as a renewable fuel the cleaner our water supply becomes. We can actually clean up our lakes and rivers by using sewage sludge as a fuel source.

Ever wonder if there is a cleaner, cheaper, safer and 100% environmentally friendly fuel source? The truth is we had it all along, for millions of years. The one thing that sustains all life - plants, animals and humans - is also the source of our past, present and future energy needs. The safest, cheapest and cleanest fuel source is water.

Water covers 71% the Earth’s surface, the oceans contain 97.2% of Earth’s water. The Antarctic ice sheet, which contains 90% of all fresh water on Earth. Already knew that. What most of you don’t tend to remember is that water is composed of two gases - Oxygen and Hydrogen. Water is known as H2O with Hydrogen content being 2 parts to 1 part Oxygen. So what? Oxygen is what we all breath, including the engines in our vehicles. Hydrogen is the most abundant of the chemical elements, constituting roughly 75% of the universe’s elemental mass. To the point, hydrogen is a flammable gas making it a viable fuel source.

You’ve heard of hydrogen fuel cells being offered in new vehicles. They have made vehicles that run on hydrogen fuel cells, or in other words on hydrogen. If they already have the technology to run our vehicles on hydrogen why haven’t we gotten away from the polluting and war causing oil? The answer is profit. Once the technology gets out, and it is, the general population will have access to unlimited “free” fuel. Until they can monopolize all the water in the World they will develop new hydrogen technology at a crawl pace. Look at the oil companies today. They are at the top of the Fortune 500. Record profits are being made.

Every ship that sets to sea already has access to an unlimited supply of fuel. Every ocean vessel can sail without ever stopping to refuel. No more contaminating the water when ships dump their bilge water before entering ports. Their clean burning fuel is sea water. Sea water can be split into its Oxygen and Hydrogen gases and the hydrogen can be used to power the ship’s engines. The technology is there to drastically reduce our dependency on oil today.

A Canadian inventor has been busy working on new energy technology that will drastically reduce and one day eliminate the need for fossil fuels. His green energy technology company call Kincaids Energy Technology and Solutions has been working on a device that splits water into Hydrogen and Oxygen gas. The process called cold fission (fission is a splitting of something into two parts.) uses very little energy to split the bond between hydrogen and oxygen in water. The “Water for Fuel Project” process uses harmless radio waves to successfully separate the oxygen from the hydrogen in water. Immediately after applying a very low radio frequency to the water, hydrogen and oxygen bubbles begin to rise to the surface of the water.

The goal of the “Water for Fuel Project” is to use sea water as the fuel source for gas generators, gas stoves, barbecues, gas furnaces and gas lamps. The same device being developed can be modified to provide hydrogen gas from sea water to power the engines of every ship that sets sail carrying cargo, grain, and tourists. This device will drastically reduce the operating costs for every ocean vessel.

With Global Warming being blamed for the rising sea water levels using sea water (water that we cannot drink or use for crop irrigation) as a fuel is another viable solution to prevent shorelines from disappearing. The oceans contain 97.2% of Earth’s undrinkable water so why not convert it into a fuel source. By doing so we would also be re-oxygenating the air we breathe. When we separate the Hydrogen (H2) from the water (H2O) we are left with Oxygen. Something we and every other living creature on Earth needs to live.

It is possible for cities to produce their own energy fuel supply as well as be eco friendly. The infrastructure is already there and the fuel is already being pumped through the cities. What is it that will provide cities with fuel and at the same time drastically clean up the environment? The fuel source is free for the taking and is renewable. The answer to a major city’s energy needs is sewage.

Currently Ontario cities pump billions of liters of untreated sewage into the Great Lakes every year. The main reason for pumping raw sewage into the Great Lakes is a financial reason. Before now cities saw sewage as worthless. It costs $millions to treat sewage and some cities just don’t have the budget to treat all of the sewage. “Millions of Ontarians and their kids, drink, bathe, and eat food grown with Great Lakes water yet cities are to this day pumping billions of liters of “untreated” sewage into them. The answer to the cities needs both for energy and water treatment is treating the sewage as a fuel source.

How can sewage be used as a fuel source to say generate electricity for use in the cities to power street cars, lights, air conditioners, home appliances and business computers and machines? As unappealing as it may seem sewage can cut greenhouse gases, help cleanup water supplies and add a new source of green and endlessly renewable fuel. Left on its own to decay, waste pumped from septic systems (known as septage) produce methane gas (a powerful greenhouse gas in itself) and carbon dioxide, the most popularized greenhouse gas. The result is steady supply of methane that can be used directly as fuel or mixed with natural gas for pipeline distribution. (Natural gas is mostly methane. The mix is relatively easy.) Septic waste could become a valuable commodity since it could be used to make fuel. If septic waste were channeled away from wastewater treatment facilities those facilities would be left to process only gray water, like dirty dish water.

Methane Fuel Generation From Human Wastes

- Anaerobic fermentation or digestion is the most promising process for converting organic materials to methane and other gases.
- A simple apparatus can be constructed to produce bio-gas.
- Bio-gas usually contains about 60 to 70 percent methane, 30 to 40 percent carbon dioxide, and other gases.

Converting organic materials, such as human wastes, to an easily used form of fuel can be accomplished by several methods. The process with the greatest potential is anaerobic fermentation or digestion.

The extraction of fuel from wastes using anaerobic digestion to produce bio-gas is not new and the general technology is well known. Bio-gas, which is methane and other gases, has been known as swamp gas, sewer gas and fuel gas. Sewage treatment plants generate bio-gas from the sewage sludge as part of the sewage treatment processes. Since sewage treatment is a 24/7 process bio-gas is being produced 24/7 as well. Today though, the bio-gas is not collected and used as a fuel source for the energy needs of the city, it is all vented. Using human waste to produce a renewable fuel source is not rocket science. All you have to know is how the fuel is produced and then you simply make modifications to the sewage processing plants to start producing an unending supply of fuel.

First off methane is produced by bacteria. The bacteria are anaerobes and operate only in anaerobic environments (no free oxygen). Constant temperature, pH and fresh organic matter promote maximum methane production. Temperatures usually are maintained at approximately 95 degrees F. Other temperatures can be used if held constant. For each 20 degrees F decrease, gas production will be cut approximately one half or will take twice as long. A constant temperature is critical. Temperature variations of as little as 5 degrees F can inhibit the methane-formers enough to cause acid accumulation and possible digester failure.

Anaerobic digestion is a series of processes in which micro organisms break down biodegradable material in the absence of oxygen and is widely used to treat wastewater. As part of an integrated waste management system, anaerobic digestion reduces the emission of landfill gas into the atmosphere. Anaerobic digestion is widely used as a renewable energy source because the process produces a methane and carbon dioxide rich biogas suitable for energy production helping replace fossil fuels. Also, the nutrient-rich digestate can be used as fertiliser. The digestion process begins with bacterial hydrolysis of the input materials in order to break down insoluble organic polymers such as carbohydrates and make them available for other bacteria. Acidogenic bacteria then convert the sugars and amino acids into carbon dioxide, hydrogen, ammonia, and organic acids. Acetogenic bacteria then convert these resulting organic acids into acetic acid, along with additional ammonia, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide. Methanogens, finally are able to convert these products to methane and carbon dioxide.

Anaerobic digestion is a two-part process and each part is performed by a specific group of organisms. The first part is the breakdown of complex organic matter (manure) into simple organic compounds by acid-forming bacteria. The second group of microorganisms, the methane-formers, break down the acids into methane and carbon dioxide. In a properly functioning digester, the two groups of bacteria must balance so that the methane-formers use just the acids produced by the acid-formers.

Anaerobic digestion facilities have been recognised by the United Nations Development Programme as one of the most useful decentralised sources of energy supply, as they are less capital intensive than large power plants.

A simple apparatus can produce bio-gas. The amount of the gas and the reliability desired have a great influence on the cost and complexity of the system. A simple batch-loaded digester requires an oxygen-free container, relatively constant temperature, a means of collecting gas, and some mixing. Because methane gas is explosive, appropriate safety precautions are needed.

The solution to 2 very major problems (energy needs and waste treatment) that all cities face is already flowing beneath their streets. The solution is provided by its citizens 24/7 making it the most abundant and endlessly renewable source of fuel. Just redirecting sewage into a digester in urban areas meets the entire Kyoto protocol requirements for North American cities without even considering the natural gas production.

The main components of automobile exhaust are carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapor (H2O). Because of the rising concern over global warming due to greenhouse gases many countries are now adopting emission standards as a means to reduce CO2 emissions. Emission standards are requirements that set specific limits to the amount of pollutants that can be released into the environment. Many emissions standards focus on regulating pollutants released by automobiles (motor cars) and other powered vehicles but they can also regulate emissions from industry, power plants, small equipment such as lawn mowers and diesel generators.

In the United States, emissions standards are managed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The state of California has special dispensation to promulgate more stringent vehicle emissions standards, and other states may choose to follow either the national or California standards.

California’s emissions standards are set by the California Air Resources Board, known locally by its acronym “CARB”. Given that California’s automotive market is one of the largest in the world, CARB wields enormous influence over the emissions requirements that major automakers must meet if they wish to sell into that market. In addition, several other U.S. states also choose to follow the CARB standards, so their rulemaking has broader implications within the U.S.

The European Union has its own set of emissions standards that all new vehicles must meet.

Canada also has its own set of emission standards. Ontario’s Drive Clean is an automobile emissions control program in Ontario, Canada. Originally, vehicles under 4,500 kg (cars, SUV, light trucks) and over three years old (and up to the 19th year) required an emission test every two years before the vehicle’s owner or lessor can renew its license plate. Starting with 2006, the test exemption was increased to five years, while the rolling exemption at 20 years ended, and all 1987 and older vehicles became exempt.

Are only older cars the worse polluters? Not so. Some of the worse polluting vehicles on the road today are: the DODGE SRT-10 (Churning out 488 grams of carbon dioxide every kilometre - 488g/km), BMW M3 (309g/km), RENAULT Clio Renault Sport 200 (195g/km), VOLKSWAGEN Golf R32 4MOTION (255g/km) , FORD Ka, Post 2006 1.6 Duratec Sportka (182g/km), MERCEDES R-Class R63 AMG (387g/km), MERCEDES Viano 3.5 (284g/km), CADILLAC CTS-V (350g/km), CADILLAC Escalade 6.2 V8 (383g/km), and the BENTLEY Brooklands Coupé (465g/km) ~ according to the Environmental Transport Association following a study of more than 1,300 models of cars currently on sale in Britain.

Canadian clean energy technology and solutions company, KINCAIDs, is working on ways to help reduce CO2 emissions. Their latest clean energy device, the FuelReducer Xe was developed to help reduce CO2 emissions. A number of emission tests have recently been carried out at various emission testing sites throughout the GTA (Greater Toronto Area). A number of different vehicles were tested twice, once without a FuelReducer Xe and then again after a FuelReducer Xe was installed. The Ontario Drive Clean emission testing equipment showed a decrease in CO2 emissions.

The US federal government aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 28 percent by 2020, the White House announced in January 2010. The FuelReducer Xe can help reach that goal this year, 10 years ahead of schedule.

From the assassination of John F Kennedy by the CIA to the attacks of September 11, 2001 by the CIA there has always been a conspiracy by the United States government to conceal the truth. The United States government has been covering up their crimes by burying them and classifying them as state secrets. When JFK was murdered by people within the United States government they classified J Edgar Hoovers findings as a state secret. The very people who planned the assassination of their president covered up their crime against the United States - high treason. J Edgar Hoover named George HW Bush as the one who authorized the assassination of JFK with the full knowledge of Vice-President LB Johnson.

George HW Bush on board of a Zapta Petroleum oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico. The CIA codename for the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba in April 1961 was “Operation Zapata”. Through his work with Zapata Off Shore, Bush provided a commercial cover for the Bay of Pigs invasion. Former CIA staff US Army Brigadier General Russell Bowen wrote that there was a cover up of Zapata’s CIA connections. On January 8, 2007, newly released internal CIA documents revealed that Zapata had in fact emerged from Bush’s collaboration with a covert CIA officer in the 1950s. According to a CIA internal memo dated November 29, 1975, Zapata Petroleum began in 1953 through Bush’s joint efforts with Thomas J. Devine, a CIA staffer who had resigned his agency position that same year to go into private business, but who continued to work for the CIA under commercial cover.

Zapata’s filing records with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission are intact for the years 1955-1959, and again from 1967 onwards. However, records for the years 1960-1966 are missing. The commission’s records officer stated that the records were inadvertently placed in a session file to be destroyed by a federal warehouse and that a total of 1,000 boxes were destroyed. The destruction of records occurred either in October 1983 (according to the records officer) or in 1981 shortly after Bush became Vice President of the United States (according to, Wison Carpenter, a record analyst with the commission).

The CIA was used to murder JFK. The CIA became willing participants because JFK refused to provide military support for the Bush family financed invasion of Cuba called the Bay of Pigs. Without US military support the invasion failed. The failure of the invasion also meant that George HW Bush lost $millions in revenue from a Zapata Petroleum takeover of Cuba’s oil. Under the advise of his brother Robert Kennedy, JFK refused to provide military support for the CIA Zapata Oil sponsored invasion of Cuba and for this reason the Bush family and the CIA murdered both John F Kennedy and Robert Kennedy.

Hoover’s findings were classified by Johnson, a willing conspirator, as state secrets. Johnson knew he would never be elected president so he aided and abetted the Bush family and the CIA in the murder of JFK and Robert Kennedy. The treasonous Bush family and the CIA were pardoned for the murder of a sitting president of the United States of America with the entire investigation being classified as a state secret. The secret that they didn’t want the public to know about is that people in their own government conspired to murder their elected leader. Had the Hoover investigation gone public George HW Bush and his family would have been lynched and the CIA would have immediately been dissolved and the CIA people involved in the murder would have been executed for their high crimes against the United States.

Thirty eight years later another Bush, George W with the aid of the CIA committed high treason against the United States and its people again. George W Bush, allowed his vice-president, Dick Cheney to assume the presidency on September 11, 2001. George W Bush was instructed to visit a school while Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld launched, Operation Northwoods. The planning and preparations were commenced during the later years of the Clinton administration, with full knowledge of Presidents Bill and Hillary Clinton. The Clintons and the Bush family conspired to wage war against the United States and they used a slightly revised version of Operations Northwoods. Clinton authorized and provided government funding to the CIA to prepare for and train for the attacks against the United States of America.

The attacks of September 11, 2001 was a false-flag operation plan that was originally written and presented to JFK and the United States government in 1962. The plan called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or CIA operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism on US soil. Originally these acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation but the Clintons and the Bush family revised their target to be a fictitious terrorist group called Al Qaeda. They blamed the phantom Al Qaeda for the attacks in order to create public support for a war against foreign states with oil and natural gas natural resources. States they would falsely accuse of being state sponsors of the United States created Al Qaeda terrorist organization.

The original Operation Northwoods included proposals for hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. The plan stated:

“The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.”

Several other proposals were included within the Operation Northwoods plan, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets and blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel.

In response to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations of the Cuba Project, Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the document listed methods, and outlined plans, that the authors believed would garner public and international support for U.S. military intervention in Cuba. These were to be staged attacks purported to be of Cuban origin.

The previously secret document was originally made public on November 18, 1997, by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board, a U.S. federal agency overseeing the release of government records related to John F. Kennedy’s assassination. The attacks of September 11, 2001 was based on the following Operation Northwoods plan of attack:

# Use of MIG type aircraft by US pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type planes would be useful as complementary actions. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce such fact. The primary drawback to this suggestion appears to be the security risk inherent in obtaining or modifying an aircraft. However, reasonable copies of the MIG could be produced from US resources in about three months.[15]

# Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba. Concurrently, genuine defections of Cuban civil and military air and surface craft should be encouraged.

# It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight.

a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.

b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will begin transmitting on the international distress frequency a “MAY DAY” message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to “sell” the incident.

# It is possible to create an incident which will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack.

a. Approximately 4 or 5 F-101 aircraft will be dispatched in trail from Homestead AFB, Florida, to the vicinity of Cuba. Their mission will be to reverse course and simulate fakir aircraft for an air defense exercise in southern Florida. These aircraft would conduct variations of these flights at frequent Intervals. Crews would be briefed to remain at least 12 miles off the Cuban coast; however, they would be required to carry live ammunition in the event that hostile actions were taken by the Cuban MIGs.

b. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly tail-end Charley at considerable interval between aircraft. While near the Cuban Island this pilot would broadcast that he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. No other calls would be made. The pilot would then fly directly west at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who had performed the mission under an alias, would resume his proper identity and return to his normal place of business. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared.

c. At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down, a submarine or small surface craft would disburse F-101 parts, parachute, etc., at approximately 15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast and depart. The pilots returning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found.

The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara. Kennedy personally rejected the Northwoods proposal, and removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Lemnitzer later became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963. The continuing push against the Cuban government by internal elements of the U.S. military and intelligence communities (the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion, the Cuban Project, etc.) had already prompted President John F. Kennedy to attempt to rein in burgeoning hard line anti-Communist sentiment that was intent on proactive, aggressive action against communist movements around the globe. After the Bay of Pigs, Kennedy had fired CIA director Allen W. Dulles, Deputy Director Charles P. Cabell, and Deputy Director Richard Bissell, and turned his attention towards Vietnam. Kennedy had also stripped the CIA of responsibility for paramilitary operations like the Bay of Pigs and turned them over to the U.S. Department of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which, as Commander in Chief, Kennedy could more directly control. On November 22, 1963 the CIA took back what Kennedy took from them. After the CIA assassinated JFK Lyndon Baines Johnson reinstated the CIA responsibility for paramilitary operations in the war in Vietnam. The CIA immediately began to pour into Vietnam to take control of the Opium drug trade which they needed to support their covert black ops. Many Vietnamese and Laos civilians were tortured and murdered by the CIA, not for being suspected of being Vietcong but as a result of the CIA’s illegal arms and drug smuggling and trade. The CIA website states “The largest paramilitary operations ever undertaken by the CIA took place in the small Southeast Asian Kingdom of Laos.”

Journalist James Bamford summarized Operation Northwoods in his April 24, 2001 book Body of Secrets:

“Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.”

On August 3, 2001, the National Assembly of People’s Power of Cuba (the main legislative body of the Republic of Cuba) issued a statement referring to Operation Northwoods and Operation Mongoose wherein it condemned such U.S. government plans.

On September 11, 2001 the government of the United States and the CIA jointly launched an attack against the United States. Like the plan in Operation Northwoods, the entire US Air Force was engaged in simulated exercises allowing the CIA to fly unmanned remotely controlled CIA owned aircraft, that were painted to look like US commercial airlines, and crashed them into the World Trade Centers. One hijacked plane was reported to have aired a May Day distress call and a person on the aircraft, a Barbara Olson, a conservative commentator and attorney, was reported to have called her husband, Solicitor General Tim O’Brien, to tell him that the plane was hijacked. Like in Operation Northwoods that was the last communication from the aircraft before it reportedly crashed into a field.

Millions of people saw what appeared to be a commercial airline fly into the WTC towers and they watched in horror as 3 WTC buildings collapsed. What they didn’t see is what really happened. The United States used trickery to fool the people into believing they saw US commercial airlines, filled with people, crash into the WTC buildings and the heat from the ensuing fire caused them to collapse killing hundreds more trapped inside. The CIA played a very big role to contribute to the illusion and the mass deception of 9/11. The CIA, the Secret Service and the FBI all had offices in the three buildings that were demolished on September 11, 2001. Because the CIA had offices in those buildings they were able to prepare the buildings for a controlled demolition using thermite shape charges attached to the steel frame of the building - molten iron residue, which is a ‘Controlled Demolition’ Signature was found and photographed on the day of September 11, 2001. No plane had hit WTC7 yet it free fell allegedly from small fires that the fire department had stated they had knocked down (firemen talk that means the main body of the fire has been suppressed).

Immediately after the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile, as reported by Donald Rumsfeld himself, the secret service was ordered by Dick Cheney to confiscated all CCTV video from the surrounding business establishments. CCTV video cameras at both a nearby gas bar and hotel had a bird’s eye view of the attack. Those CCTV video have been since been classified as state secrets. The Bush administration refused to release any of the confiscated videos from those two businesses because they clearly showed what really flew into the Pentagon. Those CCTV videos alone would have proven that the United States government and the CIA launched a false flag attack against the United States. The confiscation and suppression of this evidence as states secret, conceals the evidence that would indict and convict the US government and the CIA of high treason, 1st degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, sabotage, conspiracy to commit sabotage, terrorism, conspiracy to commit terrorist acts, bombing, fraud, perjury and obstruction of justice.

Since the assassination of JFK the United States government has conspired with the CIA to conceal their crimes against the United States and the United States people by classifying their crimes as state secrets.

Crimes covered up by US government as State Secrets

Torture is a major crime. Torture is prohibited under international law and the domestic laws of most countries. All forms of torture are strictly prohibited - including the United States style of torture called waterboarding. Waterboarding is a form of torture that consists of immobilizing the subject on his/her back with the head inclined downwards. Water is then poured over the face into breathing passages, thus triggering the mammalian diving reflex causing the captive to experience the sensations of drowning. In contrast to submerging the head face-forward in water, waterboarding precipitates an almost immediate gag reflex. It can cause extreme pain, dry drowning, damage to lungs, brain damage from oxygen deprivation, other physical injuries including broken bones due to struggling against restraints, lasting psychological damage and, if uninterrupted, death. Adverse physical consequences can manifest themselves months after the event, while psychological effects can last for years.

CIA rendition is a major crime known as kidnapping. In criminal law, kidnapping is the taking away or transportation of a person against the person’s will, usually to hold the person in false imprisonment, a confinement without legal authority.

Assassination is a major crime. An assassination is “to murder by sudden or secret attack, often for political reasons.” It is the act of deliberately killing someone, especially a public figure, usually for hire or for political reasons.

Drone killing is a major crime. Unmanned armed drones are used by the United States to murder civilians. Drone killings target civilians who are alleged of being or supporting the resistance against US aggressions and occupations abroad. There is no evidence offered by or sought by the United State to prove that any of the murdered civilians are guilty of any crime. All drone killings are armed attacks against unarmed civilians. Drone killings are war crimes committed by the United States against unarmed civilians. In all armed conflicts the Killing of Civilians is a crime against humanity. The Massacres of Civilians is a crime against humanity.

Participation in a common plan of conspiracy for the accomplishment of crimes against peace is a war crime. The NATO attack and occupation against Afghanistan is a major crime - Crimes against Peace. Planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression and other crimes against peace - crimes that have been committed by the United States government and NATO. The armed attacks against civilian villages and their civilian populations during the occupation of Afghanistan is a war crime.

War crimes are those serious violations of the laws applicable in armed conflict giving rise to individual (including heads of state) criminal responsibility. Examples of such conduct includes “murder, the ill-treatment or deportation of civilian residents of an occupied territory to slave labor camps”, “the murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war”, the killing of hostages, “the wanton destruction of cities, towns and villages, and any devastation not justified by military, or civilian necessity”.

Article 22 of the Hague IV (”Laws of War: Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907”) states that “The right of belligerents to adopt means of injuring the enemy is not unlimited”. Today the United States is the belligerent. Their actions beginning October 7, 2001 (the start of the United States Wars of Terror) are criminal acts, perpetrated not by terrorists but by the president, vice-president and secretary of defense of the United States of America.

What benefit has the War on Terror served any country? What did the War on Terror accomplish? The truth is that it has only benefited those wishing to profit from the ultimate sacrifice of the American soldiers for a war based entirely on lies and a war against a totally fictitious enemy. The War on Terror accomplished what no terrorist organization could accomplish. It gave the US government an unjustified excuse to transform intelligence from a tool for law enforcement to a means of avoiding the law–both national and international. The “War on Terror” has seen intelligence agencies emerge as major political players. “Rendition,” untrammeled surveillance, torture and detention without trial are all illegal under both US and International Law yet the US government, first under Bush and now under Obama, are making these illegal acts their official policies. The new culture of victimhood in the US and among partners in the “coalition of the willing” has crushed domestic liberties and formed a global network of extra-legal license. State and corporate interests are increasingly fused in the new business of privatizing fear. The bureaucracy and narrow political goals surrounding intelligence actually have the potential to increase the terrorist threat. Americans are being killed for arrogance, for lies and for continuing the unlawful occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Many have found that the pro-Bush doctrine 9/11 Commission not only failed to help us understand what happened; it also omitted or distorted most of the facts. But if we really want to zero in on the exact turning point around which we plunged into chaos, we need to focus in particular on the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings. This is where our hearts were wrenched and our minds were made ready for never-ending war, torture, and apparently the end of everything that was American. If we are ever to emerge from this insanity, we need to know how three tall buildings collapsed due to fire, all on the same day, when no such thing has ever happened before.

Is there any doubt at all that the Bush administration committed acts of terrorism when it unlawfully used force and violence against the nation of Iraq to intimidate and coerce its government and the civilian population, in furtherance of the Bush/PNAC political and social objectives.

While the real threats to life in America and on Earth are completely ignored by the media (and the Bush / Obama administrations), we are convinced that terrorists are the only real threat out there. Political corruption, crime and environmental toxins have killed more people than all the terrorist attacks combined. Global warming may result in global catastrophe. These are threats that we can prevent to some extent. The Bush administration’s policies are making these threats worse while they pretend to protect us from terrorists.

Both the Bush administration and now the Obama administration have endangered us all with most of their policies and they are not protecting anyone from terrorist threats. The media would have you believe otherwise.

Sacrificing human rights in the name of security at home, turning a blind eye to abuses abroad and using pre-emptive military force where and when it chooses, have neither increased security nor ensured liberty. The US has lost its high moral ground and its ability to lead on peace and elsewhere. Since September 11, 2001 a flood of federal legislation has reduced American freedom without increasing our security.

Weapons, or tools of death, can be found anywhere. Anyone with the will to kill and a little creativity can figure out a way to kill on a massive scale. A tiny explosive in the right place can kill millions; such as in a chemical plant or nuclear reactor. We have been falsely led to believe that WMDs, most specifically Iraqi WMDs are the greatest threat to Americans. The Bush/PNAC administration have used this fear in order to garnish support for their radical extremist agenda. The news media seems to be part of the scam.

It was not a weapon of mass destruction that took down the World Trade Center. We can never control every weapon on the planet because too many things can be used as weapons. We can however reduce the reasons for such anger and hatred that makes people want to kill us in large scale. We can do this by refraining from attacking any country without provocation. We can do this by settling our differences through peaceful means. We can do this by applying and adhering to the rule of law.

The Bush administration attacked 2 countries that did not attack or threaten the US. They mass murdered the civilian population of Iraq and Afghanistan for the US profit gain - namely oil from Iraq and Natural Gas pipeline in Afghanistan. George W Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Robert Gates and other Bush administration officials are all guilty of mass murder, torture, wars of aggression, crimes against peace and terrorism. The US is a member of the United Nations and as a member they are bound by US Law and the UN Charter to settle their differences by peaceful means and they are strictly prohibited from waging any war of aggression against any other nation. The Bush administration used the criminal acts of September 11, 2001 to begin their war of lies and corruption against the US people and the World. Their War on Terror is a War based entirely on Lies. Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan attacked the US or any of the US allies on September 11, 2001. They would have the US people believe they did. This is the biggest lie of all times. This is the biggest crime of all times. They sold their lies to the US people and to the US Congress. They waged war against 2 countries that did not attack the US. They attacked and murdered innocent people. They have enslaved those innocent people. They have accused the innocent people of Iraq and Afghanistan of a crime that they did not commit and the US continues to murder and imprison the innocent people of Iraq and Afghanistan.

While the Bush/PNAC/US Media team has us fear Iraq, terrorists and other select WMDs, there are other threats all around us, including conventional WMDs like the ones we were supposed to be in Iraq. Our environmental policy alone will be responsible for the untimely death of millions of people, but more obvious is the many weapons that are around us right now that we are not paying attention to - like the United States weapon of mass destruction called HAARP that is used to attack foreign states by creating and controlling hurricanes, heat waves, flooding and earthquakes. What about the biological weapon called the A-H1N1 virus that was released in 2009, not by terrorists but by the United States government, in a failed attempt to kill millions. The next time we might not be so lucky.

If WMDs were really the issue we would be securing the ones right here at home. As you can see we pay them little attention, which only proves that it is not about WMDs.

Be aware that when the terror alert is raised there is probably a political agenda behind it that is being hidden. The first orange alert covered up the fake Colin Powell dossier story, although it hit in Europe like a ton of bricks.

Keep in mind that a possible reason that we are not really being protected as promised is because the threat of terror was hyped in the first place. We are at greater risk from pollution than we are from terror! We are a greater risk from the president of the United States assuming dictatorial powers than we are from a terror attack. Bin Laden didn’t take away the US people’s rights and freedoms the US government did that. Bin Laden didn’t bankrupt the US the US government did with their $trillion embezzlement of US Tax dollars. Bin Laden didn’t create a housing bubble and then started taking away your homes through orchestrated foreclosures. Bin Laden didn’t cause millions of Americans to lose their jobs the US government did. Bin Laden is not a terrorist your government is. A clear and present danger exists in the US today and the government is the only real terrorist threat to the rights, freedoms and prosperity of the US people.

According to a report issued by the US Department of State on April 2004, thirty-five (35) American citizens died from international terrorism world-wide in 2003.- The extent of the harm to U.S. citizens does not either warrant a “war on terrorism”: In the same year as 35 U.S. citizens were killed for political reasons world-wide, 16,503 persons were murdered and 93,433 persons were raped in the U.S. alone (FBI statistics). This alone demonstrates that the motive for the “war on terrorism” is not the number of victims nor their identities. During the same year 5 million people died from smoking related illness. Which is a bigger threat to life?

JFK - “Let us call a truce to terror. Let us invoke the blessings of peace. And as we build an international capacity to keep peace, let us join in dismantling the national capacity to wage war.”

JFK - “We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”

JFK - “Our duty as a party is not to our party alone, but to the nation and, indeed, to all mankind. Our duty is not merely the preservation of political power but the preservation of peace and freedom.”

For decades there has only been 2 real choices for heating your home. Either you heat with oil or electricity. Oil prices have steadily risen since 2001 and so has electricity costs. With oil there is little one can do but with electricity there is a lot that can be done.

Most home owners who heat their home using some sort of baseboard heater are faced with high electrical bills. That is guaranteed because baseboard heaters are one of the most power consuming devices in your home. A baseboard heater for an average size living room normally are rated at a minimal of 1000 watts of electrical power consumption. Some are as much as 2000 watts. Depending on how many rooms your home has your home heating electrical bill can be very high.

The solution to reducing high electrical heating costs is to rethink how we use electricity to heat our homes. To start we need to drastically reduce the power consumption of baseboard heaters. In order to do this we need to either eliminate or replace the power hungry heating element. The heating element of all baseboard heaters uses a lot of electricity just to get it hot enough to generate any heat. Then it needs a lot of electricity to keep the element hot enough to maintain a comfortable temperature.

The sole proprietor owner of FuelReducer has come up with a new electrical heating apparatus that could drastically reduce home heating cost. This new electrical heating apparatus has eliminated the existing power hungry heating element of the mass produced baseboard heaters and substituted it with a more energy efficient heat producing apparatus. The electrical heating apparatus uses less than half the electricity as currently marketed baseboard heaters. The high heat source for this heating apparatus isn’t a totally new technology. It has been around for decades.

This new device isn’t available in stores yet. It is currently being developed and tested by the owner of FuelReducer. More information on this new development and the development of other clean energy technology and solutions by FuelReducer is available on the website http://fuelreducer.com.

This new electrical heating apparatus is being developed to help reduce our dependency on oil by providing an electrical home heating device that uses a lot less electricity. The unit is being designed to either sit on a floor, table or counter or hung on a wall near an electrical outlet, like a picture. It could also be placed in front of a drafty window so that the unit can warm the cold draft. No need to call an expensive electrical technician as maintenance can be done by the home owner. The unit also has another very important feature that will be revealed after development is complete and the units are ready for marketing.

Testing has begun

Testing of the first prototype began in October 2010. The prototype was made entirely from store bought items. To make this prototype parts were stripped from various electrical appliances, tools and devices in the home of the owner of FuelReducer. The first test prototype used just 300 watts of electrical power. The amount of heat produced from just 300 watts of power was so great that the front of the unit began to overheat so the unit is going to be modified and retested. The fact that the first prototype consumed just 300 watts of power and produced a considerable amount of heat means that the FuelReducer heater consumed less than 1/3 the electrical power of the mass produced baseboard heaters (1000 watts is the average electrical consumption of a baseboard heater for a mid size to large size room). The tested prototype unit got so hot that the internal wire mesh safety grill (placed to prevent household insects or small common household debris from coming into contact with the heat source) turned red hot. After allowing it to cool down, the safety mesh was removed and the unit retested. Using just 300 watts of electricity the unit got hotter than a baseboard heater of a comparable size. The face plate of the FuelReducer 300 watt heater got too hot to touch.

In one test a digital thermometer was placed a few inches above the FuelReducer heater prototype and the temperature was recorded at 22 degrees Celsius (71.6°). The FuelReducer heater prototype was then plugged into an electrical outlet and the temperature shot up 10 degrees to 32 degrees Celsius (89.6 şF) in less than a minute.

In the winter months if the power goes out most people use gas or diesel powered generators for emergency power. Most generators can’t power existing electrical baseboard heaters. The power consumption is just to great. A 1000 watt baseboard heater or even a 1000 watt portable heater would put a heavy power demand on any power generator. The FuelReducer heater doesn’t. The power demand of the FuelReducer heater would be comparable to 3 - 100 watt incandescent bulbs. It would consume only as much power as a desktop computer system.

Invest in a cleaner future

If you or your company would like to invest in the development and production of this new electrical home heating apparatus or one of the many other clean energy designs you are encouraged to contact FuelReducer directly. Contact FuelReducer by email at sales@fuelreducer.com or through voice mail at (301) 637-7745. FuelReducer is a clean energy technology and solutions company. FuelReducer’s goal is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing fossil fuel consumption.

Was the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill the greatest environmental disaster ever? No! A much larger oil spill can be found in Alberta Canada. The BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill was accidental. The oil spill in Alberta Canada is not accidental, it is deliberately man made. The BP oil spill can be cleaned up. The Alberta Canada oil spill will never be cleaned up. The BP oil spill is temporary. The Alberta Canada oil spill has been ongoing since 1967 and will continue for an estimated 170 years. The entire World media covered the BP oil spill, and showed the World the impact the spill was having on the environment. No one is covering the greatest environmental threat to Canada and the World - the Alberta’s oil sands.

On April 20, 2010, a semi-submersible exploratory offshore drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico exploded after a blowout and sank two days later, killing eleven people and causing a massive oil spill threatening the coast of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, and Florida. The rig is owned and operated by Transocean Ltd on behalf of BP, which is the majority owner of the oil field. The company originally estimated the size of the leak at about 1,000 barrels a day but later accepted government estimates of a leak of at least 5,000 barrels per day. Huge no matter which figure you choose to believe but the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill is nothing compared to the catastrophic environmental disaster that occurs daily in Alberta Canada. BP is also apart of this catastrophic environmental disaster. BP is one of numerous firms who are extracting oil from Canadian oil sands, a process that produces four times as much CO2 as conventional drilling. The Cree aboriginal group describe BP as being complicit in ‘the biggest environmental crime on the planet’.

The Alberta Tar Sands (Saudi Arabia of the North as it is proudly referred to in the oil industry), has proven to be a financial boom to the Canadian economy. It has also proven to be an environmental nightmare. Most of the oil that is being pumped out - or actually mined out to be fried; sprayed clean and then dried; pressed and squeezed so the dirt can ultimately be liquefying - has come at an extremely high cost to the environment.

Massive dead lakes are being intentionally created to store all the oily water residue from the oil extraction process and natives are worried that it’s only a matter of time before that toxic sludge finds its way into the local drinking water.

The Oil Sands in 2007 produced 40 million tons of ‘greenhouse gas emissions’ which equals to about 10 million cars on the Canadian roads. This could grow to 142 million by 2020 if left unchecked. It is also estimated that within a couple of years, 50% of Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions will be attributable to the Athabascan Oil Sands. The province of Alberta, with 10% of Canada’s population is now responsible for 50% of Canada’s pollution!

The environmental disaster that is playing out in the Alberta’s Oil Sands, - all in the name of Canadian prosperity and US insatiable demand for oil, has made Canada one of the worlds worst contributors of ‘carbon gas emissions’.

Demand for the sticky, dirty-to-extract crude of the tar sands (called bitumen) has soared. The sector has exploded. The pressure to develop keeps mounting, with no political will to curb it, despite the serious climate and financial risks involved.

The US demand has triggered the need/greed for more capacity out of the tar sands. It’s a massive infrastructure change, the advent of a whole new fossil fuel supply chain, or a “pollution delivery system”. The building of a continent-wide network of pipelines, some thousands of miles long, to transport the crude, as well as refinery expansions on the US side of the Great Lakes to process the raw goo into gas. Pipeline and refinery expansion applications are being made and approved right now with little general awareness of the potential long-term damage to the environment.

Alberta Oil Sands - the most destructive project on Earth.

-Oil sands mining is licensed to use twice the amount of fresh water that the entire city of Calgary uses in a year.
-At least 90% of the fresh water used in the oil sands ends up in ends up in tailing ponds so toxic that propane cannons are used to keep ducks from landing.
-Processing the oil sands uses enough natural gas in a day to heat 3 million homes.
-The toxic tailing ponds are considered one of the largest human-made structures in the world. -The ponds span 50 square kilometers and can be seen from space.
-Producing a barrel of oil from the oil sands produces three times more greenhouse gas emissions than a barrel of conventional oil.

Current Canadian Minority Prime Minister Stephen Harper is looking like ‘the fool on the hill’ on the global stage with many nations using hard words like ’saboteur’ to explain Harper’s actions when it comes to the global climate change debate, but in reality, he’s only protecting his own interests. He won’t be prime minister forever and when he does return to the province of Alberta he’ll be able to rightly share in that province’s modern day ‘black gold rush!’ Stephen Harper refuses to show leadership and put hard caps on Canada’s global warming emissions — all so the tar sands can keep growing. No matter how much Canadians clamor to join the global fight against climate change, we are being held hostage by the tar sands.

The tar sands have quickly grown to become the most destructive project on Earth. Their greenhouse gas emissions are the main reason Canada’s emissions keep rising, the main reason we cannot live up to international agreements, the main reason we are becoming an international pariah on the most important issue facing humanity.

Is it really worth it to literally destroy the environment? The World’s fresh water supply is fast disappearing, not the result of human consumption but from wasteful oil extraction from Alberta’s oil sands. The water is being contaminated by the oil extraction process. Millions of liters of fresh water per day are used by the oil extraction refineries. That water will never be fit for human or animal consumption ever again. It is a loss of the most essential element on Earth. Fresh water is essential for the survival of humanity and every living thing on Earth. Water is a ubiquitous chemical substance that is composed of hydrogen and oxygen and is vital for all known forms of life. It is essential for growing the food we need to survive. Approximately 70% of freshwater is consumed by agriculture.

Oil is not essential. It isn’t essential for the survival of all humanity. Oil only puts money in the pockets of a very select few. The amount of money they receive for destroying the environment and humanity can never be fully spent and it can’t be taken with them when they die. Perhaps the only way these greedy politicians and business people will see what they are destroying is to force them to live the rest of their lives on the banks of the oil sludge lakes they created. Force them to live off of the land they destroyed and drink from the waste water they created. Only then would they realize that even their own existence is being destroyed by their greed.

The real reason why NATO attacked Afghanistan has nothing to do with 9/11. The real reason is exactly the same reason why the United States attacked Iraq - OIL. The United States began planning an attack against Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran years before 9/11. Planning began when the elected ruling party of Afghanistan, the Taliban, chose non-American oil companies to build a Trans-Afghan pipeline across Afghanistan to Pakistan. For years the Taliban were eagerly negotiating with the United States to build this pipeline and they were even invited to Texas where they were entertained by then Texas Governor George W Bush and the major oil companies of the United States. The pipeline construction negotiations ended when the United States demanded complete control of the Trans-Afghan oil and natural gas pipeline that was proposed to be built through Afghanistan. The United States demands amounted to the robbery of a very lucrative financial future for the Afghan people. The Taliban refused to accept the outrageous demands made by the United States and rightfully so began negotiating with other non-American oil companies to build their black gold pipeline. The Taliban were looking out for what was in the best interest of their country and people. Foreign control of their financial future was out of the question. US control over the Trans-Afghan pipeline project was and is a violation of the territorial integrity and political independence of Afghanistan. The Taliban did exactly what any other country leader would do if a foreign country tried to take control of a major source of revenue for their country and people.

It wasn’t long after the Taiban signed a deal with a non-American company that the US government launched a revised version of Operation Northwoods on September 11, 2001. Operation Northwoods was a false flag attack against the United States by the United States government. Operation Northwods was used as a pretext for war to take control of the oil of the Caspian region.

The Caspian Pipeline was and still is the real reason why the United States attacked and now occupies Afghanistan. The United States sent more troops and now tanks to Afghanistan to clear a path for the pipeline through Afghanistan. Over 90% of NATO illegal attacks against the Afghan and Pakistani civilian population is to clear a path so that construction can begin. The United States did exactly that when they made plans to build a railroad across the United States. They sent the army to hunt down and kill the native American Indians, not because they were violent savages who threatened the white American colonists but because the land belonged to the native American people and the United States government refused to negotiate and buy the land. The land where the Tran-Afghan pipeline is to be built belongs to the Afghan people and once again the United States refuses to negotiate with the representatives of the Afghan people - the Taliban - to build the pipeline. Instead the United States has sent their army to once again hunt and murder the Afghan people and their elected leaders - the Taliban.

For evidentiary proof that oil was the real reason why NATO launched a unlawful war against Afghanistan and Iraq you need only to visit C-SPAN’s website. In a conference titled “Caspian Pipelines: The Keys to the New Oil Rush” the heads of a US oil and gas consortia in the Caspian conducted an overview of planned routes, challenges and possible solutions. The videos on that website gives evidence that the United States had their eyes on the Caspian oil since as early as November 19, 1997 - almost 4 years before 9/11. Watch the videos at http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/Caspi. The videos clearly presents concrete evidence that the United States planned for and prepared for a war with Afghanistan long before 9/11. The planning, preparation, initiation and waging of this war against Afghanistan by the United States is a war of aggression - a military conflict waged without the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a crime under the customary international law. The military actions and war crimes committed by the United States and NATO against Afghanistan and Iraq is exactly the same military actions and war crimes committed by Adolf Hitler’s Nazi regime in World War II. The waging of this type of war was called the supreme crime by Justice Robert H. Jackson, chief prosecutor for the United States at the Nuremberg Trials.

The Nürnberg Tribunal condemned all war of aggression in the strongest terms: “To initiate a war of aggression . . . is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.” It held individuals accountable for “crimes against peace”, defined as the “planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing….” When the United Nations General Assembly unanimously affirmed the Nürnberg principles in 1946, it affirmed the principle of individual accountability for such crimes.

The rule of law is clear. The use of armed forces by the United States and NATO against Afghanistan and Iraq is a major crime. The North Atlantic Treaty specifically states that NATO was: founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law.

The rule of law states:

* The “territorial integrity” rule means that it is a crime of aggression to use armed force with intent permanently to deprive a state of any part or parts of its territory, not excluding territories for the foreign affairs of which it is responsible;

* The “political independence” rule means that it is a crime of aggression to use armed force with intent to deprive a state of the entirety of one or more of the prerequisites of statehood, namely: defined territory, permanent population, constitutionally independent government and the means of conducting relations with other States;

* The “sovereignty” rule means that it is a crime of aggression to use armed force with intent to overthrow the government of a state or to impede its freedom to act unhindered, as it sees fit, throughout its jurisdiction.

There is no statue of limitation for the actions taken by the US when they attacked Iraq and Afghanistan. Their attacks were premeditated homicide. They attacked without cause or provocation. Their actions were taken, not out of legal self-defense, as proven by their admission that Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks of September 11, 2001 against the US, but out of aggression. The FBI has already gone on record stating that Usama bin Laden, the purported accused mastermind of 9/11, had nothing to do with 9/11. The FBI, the US national (federal) police force stated that there was no evidence to link bin Laden to 9/11. That statement alone made the US attacks against Afghanistan and then Iraq illegal.

The US waged a war of aggression against both Iraq and Afghanistan. The taking of innocent lives is the criminal act known as homicide. There is no immunity for anyone who commits homicide. There is not justification, reason or just cause to commit homicide other than out of self-defense. The US attacked and commited mass homicide against the Iraqi and Afghan people. Their actions were premeditated, deliberate and reckless and executed with malice. Leaders of NATO and NATO member leaders are also guilty of homicide as they are all accomplices.

The law enforcement agencies of the United States know that what their leaders have done and continue to do is homicide. They have investigated untold numbers of homicide cases over the years. They know what actions are homicide and what actions are in self-defense. Those who deliberately commit homicide are arrested, incarcerated, brought before the courts, tried, sentenced and punished for their crimes. There is no difference between the actions taken by Charles Manson, OJ Simpson, Robert Pickton, John Wayne Gacy, or Ted Bundy and those taken by George W Bush, Dick Cheney, Tony Blair and now Barack Obama against the innocent people of Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. The US and UK leaders did not act out of self-defense when they planned for (premeditated) and deliberately and recklessly executed, with malice, their attacks against Iraq, Afghanistan and more recently Pakistan.

HOMICIDE

§ 24.01 Definition of Homicide

[A] Common Law and Statutory Homicide – At very early common law, “homicide” was defined as “the killing of a human being by a human being.” This definition included suicide. However, modern law defines “homicide” as “the killing of a human being by another human being.” Suicide, therefore, is no longer a form of homicide in most statutes. Homicide is divided into two crimes – murder and manslaughter.

[1] “Human Being” - The common law and majority approaches define the beginning of life as birth for purposes of interpreting the criminal homicide law. A minority of states now treat a viable – or, at times, even nonviable – fetus as a human being under the homicide statute.

Regarding the end of human life, a majority of states, either by statute or judicial decision, have incorporated “brain death” in their definition of “death.”

[2] “Murder” – The common law definition of “murder” is “the killing of a human being by another human being with malice aforethought.”

[3] “Manslaughter” – Manslaughter is “an unlawful killing of a human being by another human being without malice aforethought.”

[4] “Malice” – As the term has developed, a person kills another acts with the requisite “malice” if he possesses any one of four states of mind:

1.) the intention to kill a human being;
2.) the intention to inflict grievous bodily injury on another;
3.) an extremely reckless disregard for the value of human life; or
4.) the intention to commit a felony during the commission or attempted commission of which a death results.

[B] Model Penal Code – A person is guilty of criminal homicide under the Model Code if he unjustifiably and inexcusably takes the life of another human being [MPC § 210.0(1)] purposely, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently. [MPC § 210.1(1)] The Code recognizes three forms of criminal homicide: murder, manslaughter, and (unlike the common law) negligent homicide.

§ 24.02 Murder

[A] Degrees of Murder – At common law, there were no degrees of murder, and murder was a capital offense. Reform of the common law has resulted in the division of murder into degrees, with only murder in the first degree being a capital offense.

[B] Intent to Kill

[1] “Deliberate and Premeditated” – Typically, a murder involving the specific intent to kill is first-degree murder in jurisdictions that grade the offense by degrees if the homicide was also “deliberate” and “premeditated.”

[2] “Wilful, Deliberate, Premeditated” – Nearly all states that grade murder by degrees provide that a “wilful, deliberate, premeditated” killing is murder in the first degree.

[3] “Intent to Inflict Grievous Bodily Injury” – Malice aforethought is implied if a person intends to cause grievous bodily injury to another, but death results. In states that grade murder by degree, this form of malice nearly always constitutes second-degree murder.

[4] Extreme Recklessness (”Depraved Heart” Murder) – Malice aforethought is implied if a person’s conduct manifests an extreme indifference to the value of human life. In states that separate murder into degrees, this type of murder almost always constitutes second-degree murder.

[C] Model Penal Code – A homicide is murder if the defendant intentionally takes a life, or if he acts with extreme recklessness (i.e., depraved heart murder).

§ 24.03 Felony-Murder

[A] Common Law – At common law, a person is guilty of murder if he kills another person during the commission or attempted commission of any felony. Nearly every state retains the felony-murder rule.

[B] Statutory Law – Under most modern murder statutes, a death that results from the commission of an enumerated felony (usually a dangerous felony, such as arson, rape, robbery, or burglary) constitutes first-degree murder for which the maximum penalty is death or life imprisonment. If a death results from the commission of an unspecified felony, it is second-degree murder. The felony-murder rule authorizes strict liability for a death that results from commission of a felony.

[C] Model Penal Code – The Code also provides for felony-murder by setting forth that extreme recklessness (and, thus, murder) is presumed if the homicide occurs while the defendant is engaged in, or is an accomplice in, the commission, attempted commission, or flight from one of the dangerous felonies specified in the statute. [MPC § 210.2(1)(b)]

[D] Killing by a Non-Felon

[1] The “Agency” Approach – A majority of states that have considered the issue apply the so-called “agency” theory of felony murder, which precludes any killing committed during the commission of the felon by a person other that the defendant or his accomplices from serving as the basis for felony-murder. However, a killing by an accomplice can be imputed to others involved in the commission of the felony so that felony-murder can be charged against the non-killers.

[2] “Proximate Causation” Approach – A minority of courts apply the “proximate causation” theory of felony-murder under which a felon is liable for any death proximately resulting from the felony, whether the killer is a felon or a third party.

[3] “Provocative Act” Doctrine – A felon may be held responsible for the death of another at the hands of a third party, if the basis for the charge is not felony-murder, but instead is founded on what is sometimes termed the “provocative act” doctrine, which is simply a form of reckless homicide, e.g., a felon recklessly provokes a victim to shoot in self-defense, killing an innocent bystander.

Investment Banker Karl Schwartz lays it out as to the real reason why Afghanistan was attacked and why the United States and NATO are deliberately committing the war crime called genocide against the Taliban. Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group.

The Karl Schwartz video states:

1. The Caspian Sea Basin (Kazakstan, Turkmenistan etc.) holds between 11 and 12 trillion dollars in oil and gas resources.

2. There are only three ways to get it out:

- East to China
- West through Iran, Russia, and Turkey to Europe
- South through Afghanistan and Pakistan

3. The Taliban who controlled Afghanistan before 9/11 made pipeline deals with non-US companies and refused to change them to give control of the region’s resources to the US

The North Atlantic Treaty unequivocally declares NATO’s Afghanistan invasion and occupation illegal. The evidence clearly proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Afghanistan did not attack any NATO country including the US and Canada. The evidence clearly proves that the US, Canada and other NATO member countries are the enemy. NATO is guilty of launching an unprovoked and unlawful armed attack, a war of aggression, against the sovereign state of Afghanistan.

A war of aggression is a military conflict waged absent the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a major crime under the customary international law. The waging of aggressive war is “essentially an evil thing…to initiate a war of aggression…is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole. NATO is the aggressor who waged a war of aggression against the territoriality and political sovereignty of Afghanistan. They planned for and committed an illegal armed attack against the innocent country of Afghanistan and its people.

Afghanistan had the legal sovereign right to refuse entry into their country by any foreign state including the US. Afghanistan and its Taliban government demanded George W Bush provide proof that bin Laden was responsible for the attacks of September 11, 2001. George W Bush could not provide any proof. The US’s own FBI could not find any evidence to link bin Laden to 9/11. The FBI’s bin Laden Most Wanted Poster doesn’t even mention the attacks of September 11, 2001. On June 5, 2006, the FBI was contacted to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI was asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

NATO - The North Atlantic Treaty
Washington D.C. - 4 April 1949

The Parties to this Treaty reaffirm their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and their desire to live in peace with all peoples and all governments.

They are determined to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. They seek to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area.

They are resolved to unite their efforts for collective defense and for the preservation of peace and security. They therefore agree to this North Atlantic Treaty :

Article 1

The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.

Article 2

The Parties will contribute toward the further development of peaceful and friendly international relations by strengthening their free institutions, by bringing about a better understanding of the principles upon which these institutions are founded, and by promoting conditions of stability and well-being. They will seek to eliminate conflict in their international economic policies and will encourage economic collaboration between any or all of them.

Article 3

In order more effectively to achieve the objectives of this Treaty, the Parties, separately and jointly, by means of continuous and effective self-help and mutual aid, will maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack.

Article 4

The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened.

Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security .

Article 6 (1)

For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack:

* on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France (2), on the territory of or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer;
* on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.

Article 7

This Treaty does not affect, and shall not be interpreted as affecting in any way the rights and obligations under the Charter of the Parties which are members of the United Nations, or the primary responsibility of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security.

Article 8

Each Party declares that none of the international engagements now in force between it and any other of the Parties or any third State is in conflict with the provisions of this Treaty, and undertakes not to enter into any international engagement in conflict with this Treaty.

Article 9

The Parties hereby establish a Council, on which each of them shall be represented, to consider matters concerning the implementation of this Treaty. The Council shall be so organised as to be able to meet promptly at any time. The Council shall set up such subsidiary bodies as may be necessary; in particular it shall establish immediately a defence committee which shall recommend measures for the implementation of Articles 3 and 5.

Article 10

The Parties may, by unanimous agreement, invite any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area to accede to this Treaty. Any State so invited may become a Party to the Treaty by depositing its instrument of accession with the Government of the United States of America. The Government of the United States of America will inform each of the Parties of the deposit of each such instrument of accession.

Article 11

This Treaty shall be ratified and its provisions carried out by the Parties in accordance with their respective constitutional processes. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited as soon as possible with the Government of the United States of America, which will notify all the other signatories of each deposit. The Treaty shall enter into force between the States which have ratified it as soon as the ratifications of the majority of the signatories, including the ratifications of Belgium, Canada, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States, have been deposited and shall come into effect with respect to other States on the date of the deposit of their ratifications. (3)

Article 12

After the Treaty has been in force for ten years, or at any time thereafter, the Parties shall, if any of them so requests, consult together for the purpose of reviewing the Treaty, having regard for the factors then affecting peace and security in the North Atlantic area, including the development of universal as well as regional arrangements under the Charter of the United Nations for the maintenance of international peace and security.

Article 13

After the Treaty has been in force for twenty years, any Party may cease to be a Party one year after its notice of denunciation has been given to the Government of the United States of America, which will inform the Governments of the other Parties of the deposit of each notice of denunciation.

Article 14

This Treaty, of which the English and French texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the United States of America. Duly certified copies will be transmitted by that Government to the Governments of other signatories.

1. The definition of the territories to which Article 5 applies was revised by Article 2 of the Protocol to the North Atlantic Treaty on the accession of Greece and Turkey signed on 22 October 1951.
2. On January 16, 1963, the North Atlantic Council noted that insofar as the former Algerian Departments of France were concerned, the relevant clauses of this Treaty had become inapplicable as from July 3, 1962.
3. The Treaty came into force on 24 August 1949, after the deposition of the ratifications of all signatory states.

In 1950, the Nuremberg Tribunal defined Crimes against Peace, in Principle 6, specifically Principle VI(a), submitted to the United Nations General Assembly, as

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

During the trial, the chief American prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson, stated:

To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

The American people are right to make a big fuss over full body X-ray scans at airports throughout the United States. The scans have nothing to do with airport security. 99% of the time, explosives and weapons used in hijackings and bombings have been put on board an aircraft by a baggage handler or aircraft maintenance crew member. The remaining 1% can bring down an aircraft and the loss of life could be in the hundreds but that is not anywhere near the number of people who will die as the result of being irradiated (exposed to radiation) by airport scanners. Airport X-ray scans will sterilize and kill millions. The new threat is not from aircraft hijackers and bombers the new threat is from your own government. The true purpose of the scans is 2 fold - to sterilize the masses and make millions sick.

If you ever wanted to have children or to father children airports are the one place you will want to completely avoid. The X-ray machines where put in airports across the United States to intentionally sterilize every passenger that boards a plane. It does not discriminate who will be sterilized. Everyone who stands inside the X-ray zone of the scanner is being sterilized. The purpose of this is to stop the birth rate.

A small group of people have decided that you and your husband will not have any children. They decided that the population of the World has gotten too big and as the population increases so does demand for the limited supply of natural resources, food and water. Millions have been sentenced to death by airport X-ray irradiation.

X-rays have been proven to degrade the immune system of a healthy person. X-rays are what causes tumors they call cancer. Any amount of radiation exposure has an immediate effect on our health. The majority of people who have been diagnosed with cancer actually got the cancer from the X-rays. X-ray radiation destroys healthy cells. Those X-ray irradiated cells are the tumor. The X-ray destroys the cell. If exposure to X-ray radiation is repeated, more cells are destroyed. It is because of this repeated X-ray radiation exposure that cancer infected individuals eventually die. People diagnosed with cancer do not die as a result of the malignant tumors (your body’s immune system is very capable of getting rid of malignant tumors as it works to repair your body) they die as a result of the repeated exposure to acute levels of radiation from the X-rays.

If you have ever gone to the hospital and they told you that you required an X-ray, what is the first thing the X-ray technician always does? He or she will leave the room or stand behind a protective glass or shield. If X-rays are not harmful then why do the operators of those X-ray machine always take measures to protect themselves by removing themselves from the room or the immediate vicinity of the X-ray machine? Because all exposure to X-ray radiation is very dangerous.

At some point in your life you must have seen a movie depicting a hospital X-ray room. In every movie you see the actor who is portraying the technician always leaves the room that the patient and X-ray machine is in. You must have also seen and heard some mentioning of the effect X-rays have on our reproductive organs. In hospitals X-ray technicians either protect your reproductive organs by either covering them or focusing the X-ray away from them. Why do they do that? They know that any amount of X-ray radiation exposure can sterilize a person. A sterilized women cannot have children. A sterilized man cannot father children. Does the airport protect your reproduction organs? You know the answer to that. The X-rays are full body and the airport scanners are set up to focus on the mid section of the person’s body - the region where weapons are usually hidden and where your reproductive organs are. Still don’t think there is a major health risk associated with airport full body X-ray scanning? Think about it. The radiation exposure is not a casual exposure. They actually force you to stand there and be exposed to the same levels of radiation as a dirty bomb. They force you to stand there and be sterilized. If you are one of the millions of frequent fliers, you and millions of others will no longer be able to bear a child or father a child and millions like you will soon become sick and die.

THE KISSINGER REPORT - Global Depopulation Agenda - December 10 1974.

“We are going to get Global 2000 implemented, one way or another by famine, starvation, or by choice…
We need a real economic shock, a depression to get our message across.”

Investigations have uncovered a planning apparatus operating outside the control of the United States White House whose sole purpose is to reduce the world’s population by 2 billion people through war, famine, disease and any other means necessary. This apparatus, which includes various levels of the government is determining U.S. foreign policy. In every political hotspot the goal of U.S. foreign policy is now population reduction. The targeting agency for the operation is the National Security Council’s Ad Hoc Group on Population Policy. Its policy planning group is in the U.S. State Department’s Office of Population Affairs, established in 1975 by Henry Kissinger. This group drafted the Carter administration’s Global 2000 document, which calls for global population reduction.

“There is a single theme behind all our work. We must reduce population levels,” said Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA). “Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we had in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it “The professionals,” said Ferguson, “aren’t interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population-or else we will have trouble. ”

The Global 2000 Population Reduction Plan officially began during the Carter Administration - the plan stems from the “Global 2000 Report” to the President., a 800 page study submitted by the State Dept. and the Council on Environmental Quality to Carter (first printed in Great Britain in 1982). The mass genocide idea was originally started by members of the Club of Rome.

Excerpts from the first page of The Global 2000 Report to the President Carter;

Sir: In your environmental Message to the Congress of May, 1977, you directed the Council on Environmental Quality and the Department of State, working with other federal agencies, to study the “probable changes in the in the world’s population, natural resources, and environment through the end of the century.” This endeavor was to serve as the “foundation of our long-term planning.” The effort we then undertook to project present world trends and to establish a foundation for planning is now complete, and we are pleased to present our present report to you. What emerges are not predictions but rather projections developed by the U.S. Government agencies of what will happen to population, resources,
and environment if present policies continues.

If these trends are to be altered and the problems diminished, vigorous, determined new initiatives will be required worldwide to meet human needs while protecting and restoring the earth’s capacity to support life. Basic natural resources–farmlands, fisheries, forests, minerals, energy, air, and water–must be conserved and better managed. Changes in public policy are needed around the world before problems worsen and options for effective action are reduced.

“In many ways rampant population growth is an even more dangerous and subtle threat to the world than nuclear war. The commitment of government to deal with the population issue is of course essential.”

“There are only two ways of preventing a world with 10 billion inhabitants. Either the birth rate drops or the death rate will rise. There is no other way.”

There are, of course, many ways to make the death rate increase. In the thermonuclear age war can take care of this very quickly and in a definite way. Famine and disease are the oldest.” ~ Robert Mc. Namara, former U.S. Secretary of defense and former president of the World Bank

Steps are now being taken. Civil wars are somewhat drawn-out ways to reduce population. The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa or through disease like the Black Death, and the man made Avian Flu and the A-H1N1 Flu - or so they thought. The A-H1N1 virus was declared a pandemic by the WHO after the United States government intentionally infected people in Mexico with the disease that was created in the US biological weapons research and development labs at Fort Detrick, Maryland. The WHO and the US government claimed millions would die from the disease. However, the population was not easily fooled into being vaccinated with a cocktail of diseases, microorganisms and toxins - the vaccine was made to kill millions not the virus.

Kissinger initiated the Global Depopulation Agenda after discussion with leaders of the Club of Rome during the 1974 population conferences in Bucharest and Rome. The Club of Rome, controlled by Europe’s black nobility, is the primary promotion agency for the genocidal reduction of world population levels. The Ad Hoc Group was given “high priority” by the Carter administration, through the intervention of National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and Secretaries of State Cyrus Vance and Edmund Muskie.

Bill Gates advocates methods for depopulation of the World. “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, Health Care and Reproductive Health Services we can lower that (the population) by perhaps 10 or 15%.

Soon after the 1974 conference the World Health Organization went to work to find a means to kill millions of black people in Africa. They used a smallpox outbreak (one that they infected the population with in the first place) as a smoke screen for the weapon that will and has actually killed millions - both black and white people. That weapon was the smallpox vaccine that was used to infect millions with the deadly disease called HIV/AIDS. This wasn’t the first time smallpox was used as a weapon to intentionally kill a large number of people. The United States army killed off entire native American Indian tribes by lacing blankets with smallpox. Since smallpox was so successful in almost wiping out the entire native American Indian population and was successfully used to infect and kill millions with the lab created HIV/AIDS virus they now use vaccines in a coordinated Global efforts to kill millions more. Since the World Health Organization infected the World with HIV/AIDS, vaccines haves been exclusively used to sterilize the entire general population of third World countries.

To help in the depopulation process they are now causing Global sickness and diseases by irradiating all of our food. This processes is deceivingly called pasteurization. Pasteurization of any food that we eat kills the foods’ nutrients. First it was milk, then eggs, then beef and now our healing fruits and vegetables. Without the nutrients found in our naturally grown foods we will all become malnourished, and by becoming malnourished we will become sick and then die.

But there are still over 2 billion people who they claim need to be killed and killed quickly. Since the Swine Flu pandemic (A-H1N1) didn’t do as they had hope (both the World Health Organization and US president Barack Obama claimed millions would die from it, but didn’t) they are now resorting to irradiating (exposing to radiation) the Global population through unnecessary medical examinations, cell phones and cellular transmitting towers and now airport X-ray screening. Millions are being sterilized and millions will die from radiation exposure sickness and diseases.

The World has been set on a course into a 1930s style depression by the United States Federal Reserve Bankers. They have started printing more worthless Federal Reserve Notes which they will flood the World markets with.

The privately owned Federal Reserve Bankers have begun to dispense hundreds of billions of dollars in the United States which World leaders fear will cause a cash flood and entail inflation for the World markets. World leaders are calling for the G20 nations to set up a new mechanism that effectively monitors the reckless actions of the Federal Reserve Bankers, especially when it is not able to carry out responsible currency policies.

Members of the G20 have stated that it is necessary for the Federal Reserve Banks to report to and communicate with the G20 group before it makes major policy shifts.

There has been widespread foreign condemnation of the Federal Reserve counterfeiting new Federal Reserve Notes that critics say will lower the value of the already-weak fiat currency which draws its value from the existing currency pool.

The critics say the Federal Reserve Banks in the United States has increased its counterfeit money supply at different times without any gold or silver backing for their Federal Reserve Notes, which has led to a substantial increase in inflation and generated more debt.

The bankers who illegally coin the United States money have pushed the World closer to another Great Depression by starting up their counterfeiting presses. The United States Constitution grants the coining of money only to the elected United States Congress. The U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 8 states that only - “Congress shall have Power To … To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures; To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States. According to the United States’ supreme law no other person or organization is permitted to coin the money of the United States. As the printing of money by the privately owned and unelected Federal Reserve Banks is forbidden by US law all Federal Reserve Notes are deemed by US law as counterfeits. Any person or persons who counterfeits the legal US money is guilty of a federal offense and the elected United States government, particularly the United States Congress, is bound by the United States Constitution to punish any and all counterfeiters.

According to US law the bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks are criminals for they are counterfeiters. The United States Congress knows that they are illegally coining the United States money but have done nothing to stop this gross violation of the United States Constitution. Instead they stand by as the bankers begin their latest financial scheme they call “quantitative easing” which is just a synonym for “Great Depression”. A central bank implements quantitative easing by first crediting its own account with money it creates ex nihilo (”out of nothing”). All fiat money is created out of nothing: out of thin air. It is, however, fraudulently backed by all - the sum total of - the underlying value systems in an economy, namely sound governance, sound economic policies, sound monetary policies, sound industrial policies, sound commercial policies, etc. Annual inflation above the bank´s inflation target indicates the excess of fiat money created in the banking system. The central bank then uses the worthless (remember that the money is created out of nothing) counterfeits to purchase financial assets, including government bonds, agency debt, mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds, from banks and other financial institutions in a process referred to as open market operations. The purchases, by way of account deposits, give banks the excess reserves required for them to create new money, and thus hopefully induce a stimulation of the economy, by the process of deposit multiplication from increased lending in the fractional reserve banking system. The process by which Federal Reserve Bankers inject their counterfeit paper into the banking system by way of account deposits is exactly the same process as criminals use to money launder dirty money. According to financial experts the Federal Reserve Banks’ quantitative easing will not create any new jobs. Quantitative easing will only cause an increase in inflation. Quantitative easing can trigger hyperinflation if it is improperly used, and too much money is created. It will most certainly fail if banks are still reluctant to lend money to small business and households in order to spur demands. In the context of a global market, home printed money can flood abroad and spark asset bubbles in developing economies. An increase in money supply in excess of what is required in an economy or monetary union has an inflationary effect by eroding the real value of each unit of the functional currency as well as the real value of the accounting unit of account. If devaluation of a currency is seen externally to the country it can affect the international credit rating of the country which in turn can lower the likelihood of foreign investment. With the U.S. Treasury depleted and interest rates already at zero, the Federal Reserve Bankers are putting the nail in the coffin for the United States by printing worthless Federal Reserve Notes and flooding the Global with it. The end result can only be another Great Depression as this reckless and intentional flooding of worthless Federal Reserve Notes will not only devalue the United States’ net worth it will have a global ripple effect by devaluing the currencies of foreign states.

As inflation rises the costs of living also rises and people won’t be unable to afford goods and the economy would fall into a recession. Eventually the inflation bubble gets too big (hyperinflation) and it bursts. The result is a severe recession and if goods cannot easily be sold or exchanged for cash without a substantial loss in value, a depression.

On the evening of 24 March 1999 US president Bill Clinton ordered NATO air strikes against the Yugoslav Federation. This was the first time in its 50 years of existence that NATO has taken military action against a sovereign state. Kosovo is a province of the Serb Republic of the Yugoslav Federation, and its ethnic contradictions and bloody conflicts are in the final analysis an internal affair of the Yugoslav Federation. In the US launching military attacks against a sovereign state in this fashion without UN Security Council authorization, the US and NATO violated to a serious degree the “UN Charter” and the principles of international law. Why was the western countries headed by the United States so keen on interfering in the Kosovo crisis and launch a major attack on the Yugoslav Federation?

The United States, under the Clintons (Bill and Hillary) and other western countries declared that their intervention in the Kosovo crisis is for the sake of preserving “human rights” and preventing a “genocidal” mass slaughter there, and also preventing this conflict from involving neighboring countries and threatening European security.

Are these the true facts? No.

Bill Clinton’s air strikes killed at least 10 times more civilians than the combined death toll from both sides involved in the civil war. The civil war was never an armed attack against any NATO member country and that fact alone means NATO violated its law. Then what was the US NATO hidden agenda?

Having absorbed Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary, NATO has had the insatiable desire to continue to expand toward the former Soviet Union. And the Yugoslav Federation is a state in an extremely important strategic position in the Balkans and also has good relations with Russia; it has thus become an obstacle on the road of NATO’s further eastward expansion.

Back in 1999 NATO forces waved the white flag of “peacekeeping” as it launched air strike after air strike against the civilian population of the Yugoslav Federation to forcibly occupy Kosovo. This military action had nothing to do with peacekeeping. It was launched by the US, under Bill and Hillary Clinton, to split and weaken the Yugoslav Federation and reduce Russia’s sphere of influence and establish a European security pattern dominated by NATO. This is the first strategic conspiracy of the United States government to use NATO to launch wars that “fit” the US foreign policies and agenda in contradiction and contravention of the UN Charter and Intentional Laws and treaties.

Then US Secretary of Defense Cohen has said that NATO’s credibility was on the line in Kosovo. Why did he say that? After the end of the Cold War, NATO should have died a natural death following the demise of the Warsaw Pact. Yet in addition to ceaselessly expanding eastward, NATO also wants to formulate a so-called new strategy of development in the next century, and the core of this new strategy is to expand NATO’s functions and scope and to intervene militarily, without UN authorization, in all crises outside NATO’s defense area that are held to threaten the security of the alliance. NATO held a summit in Washington in April 1999 (at the request of US President Clinton) where this new strategy was discussed, and the Kosovo civil war (not the international crisis that Bill and Hillary Clinton claimed) become a “touchstone” for the United States to test this new strategy.

Since the end of the cold war, it has been the consistent aim of the United States to establish a one-pole world dominated by itself. Former US Secretary of State Albright said undisguisedly, regarding the Kosovo peace accord, that it would be “a table without legs” unless there were troops stationed there. That meant that if the Yugoslav Federation signs the peace accord, NATO forces will enter Kosovo without firing a shot; and if the Yugoslav Federation refused to sign, NATO forces will fight their way into Kosovo — no matter whether the accord is reached or not, NATO troops will enter and occupy Kosovo.

Having occupied Kosovo NATO forces could directly press up to the CIS (The Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is a regional organization whose participating countries are former Soviet Republics, formed during the break up of the Soviet Union.), dismantle Russian control over the CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States), and then directly insert NATO force southward into the Middle East. In this way the road would be open for the United States to use NATO to intervene militarily throughout the globe and dominate the world. NATO’s military interventions in Kosovo and now Afghanistan were driven entirely by US interests. This is the most important US strategic conspiracy in the US launching air strikes against the Yugoslav Federation. NATO’s involvement in the illegal attack and occupation of Afghanistan is it’s second move against Russia. Only after US and NATO forces were on the ground in Afghanistan could the US dare to move and take control of the Middle East oil. Now that US and NATO forces were on the ground in Afghanistan the US launched an attack on Iraq in March of 2003.

Even though US president Barry (Barrack isn’t his legal name) Obama promised to withdraw US troops from Iraq immediately after he was elected president that has not happened. He has broken the promise that gave him the White House. Why did he break his promise to the people of the United States? The US domination agenda. Obama hasn’t withdrawn all troops from Iraq as he had promised in order to get elected. The only withdrawal is from the Iraqi streets to the massive US permanent bases that shadows every major Iraqi metropolitan area.

Instead of a withdrawal as promised Obama has also increased the number of troops in Afghanistan. Obama didn’t bring the US troops home he moved the troops from one war torn region to another - from Iraq to Afghanistan. He did this for one reason. Another war. As I write this article the United States government is planning for another war of aggression. Several sources within Obama’s own administration and the US military have revealed that the US is planning to attack Iran. The troops in Iraq are going to be used by the US government to launch a future unprovoked war of aggression against Iran. Obama told congressional leaders in February of 2009 that he’s planning to pull all combat troops out of Iraq by August 2010. August 2010 has come and gone and tens of thousands of US troops are still in Iraq. Obama didn’t keep his promise to the American people.

Obama and the US government needs more US and NATO troops in Afghanistan not to fight the Taliban but to fight Russia should Russia protect it’s ally and interests in Iran. The US is also presently arming Taiwan to the teeth because China has major contracts with Iran and when the US attacks Iran the US expects Taiwan to keep China busy.

When you stop and look at the: increase in US and NATO troops in Afghanistan, the deployment of US tanks to Afghanistan for the first time in the entire war, the renewed rhetoric and threats by the US against Iran, the US arming of Taiwan despite China’s repeated formal protests, the installation of a missile defense shield throughout Europe and the US and NATO arming former Soviet block countries it becomes obvious that the US is planning to start another World War. The US attack on Iran, either directly or through Israel, will start WWIII.

The US government intentionally wants to start a World War. Why? So that the US government, both Democrats and Republicans, won’t go down in history as the ones who bankrupted the US through both parties’ involvement in the US Federal Reserve robbery of the United States and its people. The embarrassment, the shame and the indictments against US government officials, from both parties, including Mr Obama, is what they want to avoid. Starting another World War is their get out of jail free card. As soon as one US state after another declares bankruptcy the US government will have lost its hidden agenda of World domination. The US government believes that the time is now to make its move. Before the American people find out just what their government did to their country. George HW Bush was quoted saying: “if the American people ever find out what we have done, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us.”

On May 28, 2008 oil fortune heir William “Bill” Phillips wrote in regards to “Big Oil”: Did you know that the United States does NOT have any big oil companies. It’s true: the largest American oil company, Exxon Mobil, is only the 14th largest in the world, and is dwarfed by the really big oil companies–all owned by foreign governments or government-sponsored monopolies–that dominate the world’s oil supply.

To all you Democrats, when you go vote for your candidate, a blazing liberal like Barrack Hussein Obama or Hillary Clinton, just keep in mind that their liberal spending habits will further decrease the value of the American dollar on the world market and your gasoline costs will hike even higher. As they introduce more give-away programs, raise taxes on everyone to pay people not to produce or work, your dollar will continue to dwindle on the world market and you will be paying $10.00 per gallon at the next election. Cheap hydrocarbon fuel is all over. Enjoy! Enjoy the fruits of your decision to elect these folks when you are there in that voting booth and you stab your pin through a Democrat’s name.”

Bill Phillips Sr. spent nearly 50 years in the US oil and gas industry; most of his career was with the Phillips Petroleum Company. Bill is a descendant of Frank Phillips. Frank Phillips, along with his brother Lee Eldas (L.E.) Phillips, Sr., founded the original Phillips Petroleum Company in 1917 in Bartlesville, OK. Phillips Petroleum Company merged with Conoco, Inc. in 2002 to form the current ConocoPhillips oil company. ConocoPhillips has established a giant operation at Fort McMurray, in the tar sands of Alberta in Canada., to extract what environmentalists are calling “the dirtiest and most carbon-intensive oil on Earth”. In August of 2009 Obama’s US state department approved a multi-billion dollar pipeline to take the Canadian oil to the American midwest. About 1.8m barrels of it every day by 2015.

On Wednesday August 11, 2010 William “Bill” Phillips and Sen. Ted Stevens, of Anchorage, Alaska were both assassinated by the Obama government. The plane they were in was brought down by a EMP pulse beam from the United States Air Force’s star wars weapon, a weapon of mass destruction called HAARP.

The Nazi SS war criminal formed NATO has made it official that it will continue to murder and torture the innocent people of Afghanistan for years to come. The army of the Nazi Fourth Reich is now firmly established. Afghanistan is to become its base for future military operations. It will use the proceeds from the illegal Opium drug cultivation and trade to finance its illegal wars of aggression against free nations. Heroin will also be used to assimilate millions around the World. It is the weapon of choice for the new Nazi SS organization called NATO to conquer the World. Heroin will make the population of the free World weak and compliant. It will help make the populations of the free World delusional so that the Fourth Reich can grow and form a new Aryan empire.

Nazism is still very much alive today. They have been plotting to take over the world and enslave non-Aryan peoples since 4 April 1949 with the formation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Before the Nazi SS could form NATO they destroyed the organization that was responsible for defeating them in World War II - the League of Nations, and replaced it with their own called the United Nations. Through NATO and the United Nations they are plotting to take over the World in plain sight of the World leaders. They have taken over all of Europe yet nobody seems to realize that they have been conquered and now occupied. They conquered Europe without firing a shot. They conquered all of Europe financially. The European Union was and is a Nazi ideology. The European Common Market, the precursor to the European Union, was a brainchild of top Nazis in the 1940’s who wanted to preserve fascist power in the event of defeat in world war two.

A March 2010 proposal by France and Germany to create a federal European economic government in the name of mandating fiscal responsibility and avoiding a repeat of the turmoil in Greece chillingly mirrors similar plans put forward by top Nazis in the 1940’s as a means of preserving fascist power at the end of world war two .

US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128, also known as The Red House Report, details how top Nazis secretly met at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944 and, knowing Germany was on the brink of military defeat, conspired to create a Fourth Reich – a pan-European economic empire based around a European common market, precisely what the new German-French proposal calls for.

Wealthy Nazi industrialists like Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, as well as front companies set about the task of building a new pan-European business empire. According to historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave laborers, “For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler….The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.”

One such figure was banking titan Hermann Abs, who joined board of Deutsche Bank during the rise of Nazis, also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, the company that made the Zyklon B gas used to kill concentration camp victims. “Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid – reconstruction funds – to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany’s economic recovery,” writes author Adam Lebor.

“Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.”

The European League for Economic Co-operation developed policies for European integration that almost mirrored those proposed by Nazis just years previously.

In his book “Europe’s Full Circle,” Rodney Atkinson provides a list of policies proposed by Nazis and their similarity to today’s European Union (listed in bold letters).

* Europaische Wirtshaftsgemeinschaft - European Economic Community
* European Currency System - European Exchange Rate Mechanism
* Europabank (Berlin) - European Central Bank (Frankfurt)
* European Regional Principle - Committee of the Regions
* Common Labour Policy - Social Chapter
* Economic and Trading Agreements - Single Market

The Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass.

Today’s drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich – an economic rather than military imperium.”

Nazism and the EU have some very disturbing parallels. Indeed, the two are fundamentally intertwined and the origins of the EU can be traced directly back to the Nazis. No wonder therefore that years later, the march towards a federal European superstate with a centrally planned economy run by unelected bureaucrats is coming to fruition.

The foundations for the EU and ultimately the Euro single currency were laid by the secretive Bilderberg Group in the mid-1950’s. Bilderberg’s own leaked documents prove that the agenda to create a European common market and a single currency were formulated by Bilderberg in 1955. One of the group’s principle founders was H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, a former Nazi SS officer.

But the ideological framework for the European Union goes back even further, to the 1940’s when top Nazi economists and academics outlined the plan for a single European economic community, an agenda that was duly followed after the end of the second world war.

In his 1940 book The European Community, Nazi Economics Minister and war criminal Walther Funk wrote about the need to create a “Central European Union” and “European Economic Area” and for fixed exchange rates, stating “No nation in Europe can achieve on its own the highest level of economic freedom which is compatible with all social requirements…The formation of very large economic areas follows a natural law of development….interstate agreements in Europe will control [economic forces generally]…There must be a readiness to subordinate one’s own interests in certain cases to those of [the EC].”

How different is Funk’s call for governments to subordinate their economic interests to those of Europe compared with current EU leaders’ insistence that EU member states should be forced to “institute structural reforms under pain of financial sanctions”? The similarity is frightening.

Funk’s co-authors echoed his sentiments. Nazi academic Heinrich Hunke wrote, “Classic national economy..is dead…community of fate which is the European economy…fate and extent of European co-operation depends on a new unity economic plan”.

A “new unity economic plan,” this is precisely what France and Germany are proposing – centralized financial control over the economies of Europe ruled by Brussels (headquarters of the new Nazi SS Fourth Reich called NATO).

Fellow Nazi Gustav Koenig observed, “We have a real European Community task before us…I am convinced that this Community effort will last beyond the end of the war.”

In 1940, Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels ordered the creation of the “large-scale economic unification of Europe,” believing that “in fifty years’ time people would no longer think in terms of countries.” Today, the Nazi European Union has been established.

The corporate owned media perpetuates the myth that the danger of the Third Reich purportedly ended in 1945 with flimsily documented events like Hitler’s death; Germany’s capitulation and subsequent partition for 44 years; the capture of the Nazi regime’s surviving leaders and their suicides or imprisonment or execution after the Nuremberg trials; and the decades-long search for Nazi escapees.

Just take a quick look around the Internet and you will find clear evidence of the Nazis’ survival. These include the insidious “Operation Paperclip” in which Nazi scientists were secreted away and the Gestapo who created the CIA and the “Boys from Brazil” secret defection of Nazis to South America.

The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration - in other words the European Union that has now conquered Europe. Now that Europe is conquered and the armed forces of the assimilated countries are now under the control of the Nazi EU, their military called NATO is now massing along the Russian border.

This past week the United States government announced that it was sending tanks to Afghanistan. The official story line is that they will be used to fight the Afghanistan Resistance fighters. The truth is that the Nazi Fourth Reich is building a new Waffen-SS army of foreign conscripts (International Security Assistance Force) to fight a battle against Russia. The most sophisticated tanks in the United States Army are not being shipped in numbers to fight poorly armed Afghan freedom fighters, they are being sent to battle Russian tanks. Afghanistan has become the battleground of the Fourth Reich.

Search-and-rescue teams have found the wreckage of a F-22 aircraft that went missing on October 16, 2010. The body of Air Force Capt. Jeffrey Haney, who was assigned to the 525th Fighter Squadron, 3rd Wing has not been found but the United States Air Force has declared that Haney “did not eject from the aircraft prior to impact”.

A recovery team found part of the ejection seat and several life support items that Haney wore during the flight. The Air Force stated that “If a pilot was able to eject, the seat would go with him and it would not be anywhere at or near the site”. Several military pilots have rebuked the Air Force’s official statement saying that whenever a pilot is forced to eject the ejection seat and pilot will aways land very near to or even within the crash site of the aircraft. They have stated that the proof has been seen by the general public on numerous occasions at air shows where a pilot ejected from his military aircraft just seconds before the crash. The pilot has always been seen landing in close proximity to the crash site and some have even landed within the burning debris of the crashed military jet.

Why would the Air Force make statements that they know are not true? If Haney went down with the F-22 and parts of the ejection seat and several life support items that Haney wore during the flight were found at the crash site then Haney’s body would also have been found. The fact that they declared that his body has not been found means that he successfully ejected. The mission that was given to Air Force Capt. Jeffrey Haney had failed and the Air Force is now attempting to keep it a secret. By stating that Haney had died in the crash immediately ends all participation from groups outside of the Air Force - including both military and civilian search and rescue teams. Finding Haney now becomes the job of the United States Air Force with no civilian oversight. If Haney did successfully eject from the aircraft and left the crash site, as is confirmed with the finding of his ejection seat, then search and rescue is still obligated to continue searching until he is found. By declaring he died in the crash the Air Force takes over and the crash site and information as to how the crash occurred and the recovery of Air Force Capt. Jeffrey Haney becomes classified.

The job of the 525th Fighter Squadron, 3rd Wing “is to clear the skies of enemy aircraft, as well as take out any surface-to-air missiles that would deny us access to enemy airspace” - Lt. Col. Chuck Corcoran. What was Air Force Capt. Jeffrey Haney mission on Tuesday October, 16, 2010? Was he tasked to take out a surface-to-air missile site? We may never know as his mission failed and his F-22 stealth aircraft crashed. In the meantime let us look at what military targets exists within Haney’s flight path.

The F-22 fifth-generation fighter aircraft that uses stealth technology was found about 100 miles east north east of Anchorage, Alaska near Denali National Park. 180 miles North of Anchorage, Alaska and approximately 8 miles north of Gakona, Alaska is the HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) transmitter site. HAARP, also known as Project Woodpecker, is an illegal military installation that uses an Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating Method to “alter the earth’s magnetic field … in order to modify weather, create or trigger earthquakes and volcanoes, spread viruses, create an electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and, to modify behavior control among the populous.”

This transmitter site is believed to be “large enough to cover most of the Northern Hemisphere.” Operated by the Department of the Navy, Department of the Air Force and the University of Alaska, it is also believed to be only one of a number of such sites–known as Ionospheric Research Instruments that are “scattered around the world,… many of them here in the U.S.”, which are capable of connecting with a much smaller GWEN (Ground Wave Emergency Network), which comprises “remotely controlled transmitter sites that have been built all over the U.S. in a grid pattern, with their antennas spaced about every 200 miles or so.”

The HAARP project was developed in the 1950’s as the result of atmospheric hydrogen bomb tests. These tests created localized disruptions of the ionosphere that lasted for some period of weeks or months and possibly years. Another byproduct of the tests was a brief but powerful emission of high speed particles now known as an Electro Magnetic Pulse (EMP). Later on It was determined that the resultant stream of high speed Beta particles of the EMP were capable of destroying electronic equipment well outside of the blast zone. For the purposes of space warfare, the problem then was to recreate the effects of the thermonuclear blast without detonating a bomb. The final design for a missile defense system proposed introducing high power low frequency radio waves into the ionosphere using a technique called circular polarization. This creates streams of high speed beta particles that move along the magnetic field lines as well as stream out into space and back again.

Portions of the patent for the system used at the HAARP facility, (located in Gakona, Alaska), specifically describe it as a missile defense system. The patent can be viewed and downloaded at the US Patent Office website, US Patent 5,038,664. The text of the patent states, “The plasma will be contained within adjacent [magnetic] field lines and will drift to form a shell of relativistic particles around a portion of the earth”. A breakdown of the technical discussion contained in the patent explains how such an effect is produced as follows. Electromagnetic radiation of a given frequency, (1800 to 3600 kHz) transmitted to a region of the atmosphere with an altitude of at least 250 km in conjunction with another region of the atmosphere with an altitude of 1500 km receiving electromagnetic radiation of with a frequency of (20 to 1800 kHz) sets up the required field. This excitation sustained for 20 minutes causes electrons or beta particles to travel back and forth between the two regions at nearly the speed of light. These two regions then have a natural tendency to spread out creating the shell of relativistic particles. Another statement in the patent expresses the usefulness of this shell, “…wherein said shell is formed as an anti-missile shield”. It has been shown that an object, such as a missile, (or aircraft) passing through a field of relativistic particles such as that described here will almost certainly suffer significant damage. Examples of this damage would be burn through of the outer skin, severe damage to electronic components (even those that are shielded) and the possible ignition of explosives such as the warhead trigger. Most vehicles (including both land vehicles and aircraft) passing through such a field would probably see all three types of damage. Far more detailed explanations are contained in the patent.

When operating in missile defense mode the HAARP transmitter broadcasts high power low frequency radio waves in the circular polarization pattern described in the patent. Any missile or aircraft attempting to fly through a HAARP generated region of high speed particles would result in damage or destruction of its electronics and guidance systems rendering the missile or aircraft unable to reach its target or possibly causing it to burn up. At the very least the rocket engines for the nuclear warhead or the jet engines of the aircraft would be knocked out causing the missile or aircraft to crash before they could reach their target. Many of the details of this technology can by found by Google searching the internet. The official website for the HAARP project is at, www.haarp.alaska.edu/

Link between HAARP and the F-22 crash

The Air Force did not mention that Air Force Capt. Jeffrey Haney radioed that he was experiencing any problems with his F-22 - a Lockheed Martin twin-engine fighter equipped with stealth technology. The official statement from the Air Force is that he and his aircraft went missing. No distress call was mentioned being sent. That suggests Force Capt. Jeffrey Haney was on a mission and all radio communication was prohibited. With all twin-engine military aircraft the aircraft would have to have suffered a complete system failure for a crash to occur. The F-22’s twin-engines were specifically ordered part of the design so that in case of one engine failure the aircraft could return to base flying or continue its mission with the other engine. A complete system failure can only occur if the aircraft was targeted with a EMP, like the one used by HAARP which was just 80 miles dead ahead of the crash site. It takes a F-22 fighter jet just a few minutes to cover 80 miles. Lockheed Martin has stated that with afterburners, a F-22 can reach a top speed in excess of 1,317 mph or 21.95 miles per minute. With afterburners Haney could have reached the HAARP site in just under 4 minutes had he not been shot down.

After studying the Haiti quake data for the past 10 months, officials are more convinced than ever that Haitians can expect another major quake sooner rather than later. That’s largely because they’ve found, according to a new study by 10 prominent geologists, that the lion’s share of the January temblor occurred not along the fault line they originally suspected, known as the Enriquillo–Plantain Garden fault zone, but on a previously unknown fault. (Faults separate plates in the earth’s crust, which cause quakes when stress makes them collide.)

When geologists started poring over information from the earthquake’s satellite-radar images last January, they were flummoxed by a variety of features. One was the vertical motion the quake exhibited — unusual because the Enriquillo, which runs across Haiti’s southern peninsula just below Port-au-Prince, is a strike-slip fault, the kind that almost exclusively displays horizontal motion when it ruptures. At the same time, the quake’s horizontal movement was partly north-south, another anomaly for a strike-slip fault. “Those were the two important smoking guns” that made scientists question their early assumptions about the quake, says Eric Calais, a Purdue University geologist who is in Haiti as a science adviser to the U.N. Development Program and is a lead author of the study, which was published last month in Nature Geoscience.

There were others. Why, for example, did the earthquake’s rupture not reach the surface, despite its strength? And, perhaps most important, why did so little of the Enriquillo fault itself seem to rupture? The answer is that a new previously unmapped fault line simply formed parallel to the Enriquillo fault. One they’ve now identified and named the Léogâne, for the city west of Port-au-Prince where the quake had its epicenter. The Léogâne fault is a combination of a strike-slip and a thrust fault (which helps explain the vertical motion and other unnatural behavior) and was responsible for about 85% or more of the quake’s energy.

Before January, the Haiti fault hadn’t had a major rupture since 1751. Scientists have observed that only the western half of the segment that broke in 1751 came apart this time, meaning the eastern portion — closest to Port-au-Prince — is now likely a geological hair trigger. In fact, the discovery of the previously unknown and unmapped Léogâne fault, as geologists like Amelung suggest, may mean things are more dangerous than previously imagined, since it indicates the Enriquillo spent even less of its own energy in the January earthquake than they had assumed.

Geologists are dumbfounded as to how the January earthquake could have even occurred being that the earthquake didn’t occur at the Earth crust’s weakest point - at the Enriquillo–Plantain Garden fault zone. Instead it occurred where there was no fault line. What can cause an earthquake in a region where there exists not fault line? The unnatural characteristics of the Haiti earthquake suggests a man made earthquake from either an underground nuclear detonation or the result of the United States’ weapon of mass destruction called HAARP - HAARP is a weapon that can not only modify the Earth’s weather and create major storms, heat waves, monsoons and hurricanes it can also severely disturb the natural electromagnetic field of Earth and create artificial earthquakes . HAARP is an Air Force installation with powerful transmitters that are interfering with, overriding and blanking out earth’s natural magnetic field. For the first time in human history, an ever-increasing number of artificial ELF and VLF vibrations are disrupting earth’s natural internal and external electromagnetic systems (which help to maintain planetary rotation, balance and stability).

The January 1978 issue of the Specula Magazine described the goal of the United States weapon of mass destruction program called HAARP.

“An electromagnetic signal of certain frequencies can be transmitted through the earth which, when introduced into the earth at certain multiples of 30 degrees, will form standing waves in the earth itself. In certain incidence angle cases, the standing wave also induces a strange phenomenon: coherence to the standing wave is formed in the molten core of the earth itself, and a tiny fraction of the vast, surging electromagnetic currents of the liquid core begin to feed into and augment the induced standing wave.

“Depending on the frequency, focusing, wave shape, etc. one can …induce a variety of effects such as earthquakes, induced at a distant aiming point, severe disturbances in the middle and upper atmosphere over the target area…and anomalous weather effects. This is called the Tesla effect.”

On October 9, 2006 North Korea detonated a nuclear device underground which the U.S. Geological Survey recorded an earthquake at 4.2 on the Richter scale. The Seismic yield of the Nagasaki atomic bomb created an earth tremor of a 5.0 Richter Magnitude. The largest nuclear weapons ever tested, a hydrogen bomb called the Tsar-bomb created an earth tremor of a 5.0 to 5.25 Richter Magnitude and an energy yield of around 7.1 on the Richter scale. It was only because the bomb was detonated in the air rather than underground, that most of the energy was not converted to seismic waves. Given this data on how detonation of bombs of mass destruction always produces Earth tremors of between 5.0 and 7.1 Reichter magnitude, it is technologically possible to create a man made earthquake of the magnitude that shook Haiti. An underground nuclear detonation would create a new fault and it would also account for the unnatural behavior of he Haiti earthquake. Geologists have stated that the Haiti earthquake occurred as a combination of a strike-slip (horizontal motion) and a thrust fault (vertical rupture). All nuclear detonations have both a horizontal and a vertical shock wave motion. All nuclear detonation leave evidence a detonation in the form of a crater. The new fault in the Earth’s crust was created when the earth above the detonation caved in.

Another mystery and anomaly in regards to the Haiti earthquake was the fact that there were no warning tremors prior to this major earthquake. The earthquake happened suddenly, violently and quickly - as do all nuclear detonations.

Not one Canadian has sense enough to realize that our troops are killing the innocent people of Afghanistan and their duly elected Taliban ruling party. The Taliban has never been a terrorist organization. Taliban is the name of an Afghanistan political party much like Canada has Liberals, Conservatives and NDP political parties. The Afghanistan people and their Taliban ruling party have not attacked us, we attacked them. They have not killed our women and children we have killed their women and children.

When did you decide to become war mongers instead of peace keepers? When did you become baby killers? You are free. They are not. Your supporting of our troops gives your government justification and approval to keep sending our troops to continue to kill those innocent people, people who did not attack us or cause us any harm and who were no threat to us. We murdered them for what reason? They are not and never were a threat to us or any other country. They are very poor. They have no military because they are so poor as a nation. If they had a military we would not be there, the US would most definitely not be there because the US only cowardly attacks poor and defenseless nations.

Do you want to know the truth as to to why the Afghan people and their Taliban ruling party are killing our troops? Can you handle the truth? Can you accept the truth? They kill our troops because they are defending their country and people from our unlawful attacks and occupation. They are the patriotic ones. They are killing our troops to regain their freedom, a freedom that you all obviously take for granted. What would you do if you were attacked? You would fight back. They are not the enemy, we are the enemy.

The Canadian government’s website states that Canadian troops are in Afghanistan for the following reason:

We are there with more than 50 other nations and international organizations, at the request of the democratically-elected Afghan government and as part of a UN-mandated, NATO-led mission.

Least we forget Canada got involved in the “illegal” attack and war against Afghanistan at the request of the US government. The US illegally attacked Afghanistan to overthrown their democratically elected Taliban government. It wasn’t Muslim extremists who made the decision to help bring the Taliban to power in the mid-1990s: it was the US government who did that, on the theory that the Taliban political party would help bring stability to Afghanistan. The US was responsible for the Taliban being the governing body of Afghanistan because the Taliban fought the US proxy war against the Soviet Union. The Taliban and bin Laden successfully drove out the Soviet Union from Afghanistan with the full support of the US government. The US financed what is now known as the Taliban (made up of Afghanistan nationalists) and Al Qaeda (made up of CIA financed, trained and controlled foreign mercenaries). The US provided the Taliban “freedom fighters” with shoulder fired stinger missiles, heavy machine guns and anti-tank weaponry. Without these weapons the Soviet Union would not have been driven out.

Proclamation 5034 — Afghanistan Day, 1983
By the Ronald Reagan - President of the United States of America, 21 March 1983

The tragedy of Afghanistan continues as the valiant and courageous Afghan freedom fighters [The Taliban] persevere in standing up against the brutal power of the Soviet invasion and occupation. The Afghan people are struggling to reclaim their freedom, which was taken from them when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in December of 1979.

In this three-year period the Soviet Union has been unable to subjugate Afghanistan. The Soviet forces are pitted against an extraordinary people who, in their determination to preserve the character of their ancient land, have organized an effective and still spreading country-wide resistance. The resistance of the Afghan freedom fighters is an example to all the world of the invincibility of the ideals we in this country hold most dear, the ideals of freedom and independence.

Canada’s mission in Afghanistan is not about rebuilding, or democracy, or freedom or any number of other excuses given by the government, it is about Canada’s wilful participation in a war of aggression against a nation that did not attack Canada, the US or any other nation. They are willing participants in a war crime. They are engaging in the mass murder of the innocent people of Afghanistan. Afghanistan did not have any hijackers involved in the criminal hijackings of US commercial airlines, on US soil, on September 11, 2001. Canada is there at the request of the US government. There is no democratically elected government in Afghanistan as Afghanistan is under military occupation. There can be no democracy without self-governing. There can be no democracy while under military occupation by the US, Canada and other NATO states.

The US imposed leader of occupied Afghanistan was and is an agent of the US government. The CIA played a key role in the rise to power of US imposed president Hamid Karzai, according to a new publication in the Netherlands. After the events of 9/11, Hamid Karzai entered Afghanistan from Pakistan in the first week of October on a motorcycle and headed for Uruzgan province, where many of his supporters of the Popolzai tribe lived. Dutch journalist Bette Dam reveals in her book ‘Expedition Uruzgan’* that Karzai’s ‘luggage’ included a satellite phone and a large sum of money provided by the CIA. Karzai and a small group of armed supporters moved to the hamlet of Durji, to the Northwest of the provincial capital Tarin Kowt. Karzai had described Uruzgan province as a pivotal stronghold. But so it was for the Taliban.

The ruling Taliban soon got word of Hamid Karzai’s whereabouts. The CIA subsequently organised an emergency evacuation operation by helicopter and flew the future president to the safety of Jacobabad Airbase in Pakistan. Karzai was quickly sent back to Afghanistan to Durji, this time with the support of a 12-men team (ODA-574) made up of US Special Forces and a CIA team of some six men, of the covert ‘Special Activities Division‘. The book identifies the leader of the team as ‘Graig’, and describes in detail the contacts between Hamid Karzai, Washington, and the CIA station in Islamabad (Pakistan) prior and during the uprising.

By late November, key pro-US leaders from Afghanistan met near Bonn (Germany) and decided, “under strong pressure from the US”, to appoint (the people of Afghanistan never had a say through a vote) Hamid Karzai as interim president of the country. CIA paid Hamid Karzai participated in the meeting via his satellite telephone while still in Uruzgan province. Hamid Karzai’s US appointment as their president for Afghanistan was almost and prematurely finished on December 5th, 2001, when a US bomber dropped a 2,000lbs guided bomb on ‘friendly’ positions north of Kandahar, killing three Green Berets (including two members of ODA-574) and numerous Afghan fighters. Karzai escaped death and was only slightly injured.

We are the enemy. We attacked them without the justification of self-defense.

The Canadian mission in Afghanistan is illegal according to the UN Charter, Canadian Law, US Law and International Law. A war of aggression is a military conflict waged absent the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a crime under the customary international law.

The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, called the waging of aggressive war “essentially an evil thing…to initiate a war of aggression…is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

The President of the US swears to “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution (article VI, paragraph 2) states: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land.”

One of the most important treaties that the U.S. is signatory to is one governing when a nation may go to war. After 20th century wars that killed over 100 million human beings, the UN was formed to eliminate war as a foreign policy option The UN Charter is registered in the US State Department as a Treaty in Force.

Therefore, one of the most important Constitutional duties of any US President is to follow the law to not unleash the world’s most powerful destructive force. It is therefore the duty of the U.S. president to defend innocent countries and their civilian population from such onslaught and misery. This is also one of the most important laws for citizens to understand and hold their political leadership accountable for ethical behavior and demand prosecution in its violation.

On August 17, 2009 President Obama again defended the US invasion of Afghanistan. He called it “fundamental to the defense of our people,” and said, “But we must never forget this is not a war of choice, this is a war of necessity. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al-Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans.”

Let’s review the history of the US invasion of Afghanistan before we analyze the US claim that this is a defensive war. After the attacks of 9/11, the US government requested the cooperation of the Afghanistan Taliban government for extradition of Osama bid Laden to be charged with the 9/11 attacks. The Taliban ruling government agreed, as per usual cooperative international law, as soon as the US government provided evidence of bin Laden’s involvement. The US government refused to provide any evidence. The Taliban ruling government refused to allow US troops to enter their country and extradite bin Laden until evidence was provided, and made their argument to the world press for the rule of law to apply to the US extradition request. The US invaded Afghanistan without providing evidence and without UN Security Council approval. President Bush stated, “There’s no need to discuss evidence of innocence or guilt. We know he’s guilty.” Nine years later, despite promises to do so, the U.S. has not provided any evidence that bin Laden was involved in the 9/11 attacks. Indeed, the FBI does not seek bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks, stating “there is no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”

Some of you might have heard of a bin Laden “confession video.” The Pentagon’s “official translation” seems to indicate foreknowledge of the attacks, but independent translations show that the “official” version is a manipulation and an accurate translation shows no evidence of involvement. Apparently, the FBI is in agreement with the independent translations as they do not seek him for the crime. Indeed, Princeton professor of International Law Richard Falk articulates doubts concerning many aspects of the government’s explanation of 9/11. This view of a counter-government explanation is now shared by over 1,500 reputable scholars and professionals with academic training and professional experience that qualify them as experts in their testimonies.

The US invaded Afghanistan. The US provided no evidence to the Taliban Afghan government that bin Laden was involved in 9/11 and still have not done so. The US has provided no evidence that the Taliban supported the attacks of 9/11. The UN Security Council did not authorize use of force in Afghanistan. The US has provided no evidence of imminent threat to US national security from the Taliban. With no evidence of imminent threat or attack by Afghanistan, the US invasion is a War of Aggression. And yes, it’s just that simple.

Bush, Jr. went to the United National Security Council to get a resolution authorizing the use of military force against Afghanistan. He failed to get a resolution from the UN authorizing the use of military force against Afghanistan. This war has never been authorized by the United Nations Security Council. The first Security Council resolution refused to call what happened on September 11, 2001 an “armed attack” - that is by one state against another state. Rather they called it “terrorist attacks.” The critical point here is that this war has never been approved by the U.N. Security Council so technically it is illegal under international law. It constitutes an act and a war of aggression by the United States against Afghanistan.

Now in addition Bush, Jr. then went to Congress to get authorization to go to war. Bush, Jr. tried to get a formal declaration of war along the lines of December 8, 1941 after the Day of Infamy like FDR got on Pearl Harbor. He failed to get a declaration of war. Despite all the rhetoric we have heard by the Bush, Jr. administration Congress never declared war against Afghanistan or against anyone. There is technically no state of war today against anyone as a matter of constitutional law as formally declared.

Was the invasion of Afghanistan a legitimate act of self-defense by the United States after the 9/11 attacks? No, for several reasons. First, self-defense, in both international law and domestic law (in Canada, the Criminal Code), must be clearly distinguished from the use of force for revenge or punishment; states, like persons, must not act as vigilantes. Second, in criminal law, self-defense may be invoked in the face of an imminent threat of death or grave bodily harm. In general, the threat must be immediate and the response must not be pushed beyond what is reasonably required to repel that threat. Therefore, in general, self-defense may not be invoked to justify physical retaliation to an attack a few weeks after it occurs. The appropriate course of action in that case would involve police work, legal proceedings, and so forth.

Article 1 of Resolution 3314 of the UN General Assembly (1974) defines aggression: Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.

The resolution provides several concrete examples of acts that would be considered instances of aggression, including invasion, blockade, bombardment, or “[t]he sending [of armed groups] by or on behalf of a State” against another state.

In the case of the 9/11 attacks, the concepts of self-defense and aggression simply do not apply. Afghanistan could not be considered an aggressor state since the attacks were neither perpetrated by it or its agents nor planned on its territory. As well, in early October 2001 when it launched its war on Afghanistan, the United States was not, to anyone’s knowledge, facing an imminent threat of new attacks.

In both international and domestic law, self-defense certainly cannot be invoked to justify a later attack on a person or country who is merely presumed or claimed to be an aggressor. The US aggression against Afghanistan in October 2001 more closely resembles the new doctrine of “preventive war” which the White House subsequently made official in its National Security Strategy of September 2002. With this doctrine, the US claims the right to attack unilaterally, “preventively,” any country perceived as a serious threat to its vital interests or those of its allies. This doctrine was used as a cover for the invasion of Iraq and will likely serve the same purpose in any future aggression against Iran, Syria, or other countries. Under international law, such acts and “strategy” are totally illegal and illegitimate. Quite interesting that “preemptive attack” doctrine was rejected by the Nuremberg Tribunal when the lawyers for the Nazi defendants made it at Nuremberg. They rejected any doctrine of preemptive attack. When Bush failed to get any formal authorization from the Security Council, the U.S. Ambassador Negroponte sent a letter to the Security Council asserting Article 51 of the U.N. Charter to justify the war against Afghanistan. Basically saying that we reserve the right to use force in self-defense against any state we say is somehow involved in the events of September 11. Again George W Bush failed to get any formal authorization to use force against Afghanistan because of a legal precedent that goes back to the Nuremberg Judgment of 1946 where the lawyers for the Nazi defendants argued that we, the Nazi government had a right to go to war in self-defense as we saw it, and no one could tell us any differently. That argument was rejected by Nuremberg. In 2001 the highest level of officials of the US government made the same legal arguments that were rejected by the Nuremberg Tribunal.

Was the Afghanistan war authorized by the United Nations?

The war in Afghanistan was devised and directed by the United States. It was led by a coalition of countries, mainly NATO members (including Canada), who on 4 October 2001 invoked Article 5 of the North Atlantic (Washington) Treaty. Under this provision, an armed attack against any NATO country is considered an attack against them all. However, the UN declared the 9/11 attack as a “terrorist attack” not an “armed attack”. Even to this day the US government regards the attacks of September 11, 2001 as a “terrorist attack”. The US Congress did not recognize or declare the attacks as an “armed attack” which legally means that the US could not invoke Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.

There is no UN Security Council resolution authorizing the United States, whether alone or in coalition with other countries, to attack Afghanistan. Between 11 September and 7 October 2001, when the bombardment of Afghanistan began, the UN Security Council adopted only two resolutions, both concerning the 9–11 attacks. Resolution 1368 of September 12 “unequivocally condemns in the strongest terms the horrifying terrorist attacks… and regards such acts, like any act of international terrorism, as a threat to international peace and security.” The preamble to this resolution recognizes “the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense in accordance with the Charter. The terms of the Charter do not apply to the Afghan war. The language in the preamble of the resolution allowed the United States government to claim legitimacy for its actions despite none ever being implied or authorized by the United Nations. Then, on 28 September 2001, the Security Council adopted Resolution 1373, which sets forth certain anti-terrorism measures that all states must apply. Neither Resolution 1368 nor Resolution 1373 even mentions the word “Afghanistan.

“But your iniquities have separated you from your God; and your sins have hidden His face from you, so that He will not hear. For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue has muttered perversity. No one calls for justice, nor does any plead for truth. They trust in empty words and speak lies; they conceive evil and bring forth iniquity. They hatch vipers’ eggs and weave the spider’s web; he who eats of their eggs dies, and from that which is crushed a viper breaks out. Their webs will not become garments, nor will they cover themselves with their works; their works are works of iniquity, and the act of violence is in their hands. Their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed innocent blood; their thoughts are thoughts of iniquity; wasting and destruction are in their paths. The way of peace they have not known, and there is no justice in their ways; they have made themselves crooked paths; whoever takes that way shall not know peace” (Isaiah 59:2-8).

I Support Peace. I support the immediate end to the illegal war and occupation of Afghanistan. I support the laying of charges of; war crimes, war of aggression, crimes against peace and murder against the leadership of the United States, Canada and NATO.

Many in the US think that the US Federal Reserve is a Federally owned and controlled banking system. That is fiction. The US Federal Reserve is a privately owned bank with shareholders and banks around the World. The Federal Reserve System (also known as the Federal Reserve, and informally as the Fed) is the central banking system of the United States. It was created in 1913 by the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act, largely as a response to a series of orchestrated financial panics or bank runs, particularly a severe panic in 1907. Today the Federal Reserve is behind the US economic crisis, a repeat of 1907 whereby the shareholders of the modern Federal Reserve have orchestrated another financial panic. An audit of the Federal Reserve would reveal that the banks (will list them below) conspired to defraud the United States people of $trillions. An audit would reveal that there was no actual $billion loses, only a falsely proclaimed loss. You see the books of a private company are not under federal scrutiny unless there is reason to believe that the company isn’t or hasn’t reported its true earning to the government so that the government can collect the proper amount of taxes. What an audit would reveal is that the Federal Reserve banks, domestic and foreign banks make up the US Federal Reserve, conspired to commit fraud by understating their earning and overstating their losses in order to get their hands on US taxpayers dollars that have now exceeded $6 trillion. You see the bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks have done this before - in 1907.

The Panic of 1907, also known as the 1907 Bankers’ Panic, was a financial crisis that occurred in the United States when the New York Stock Exchange fell close to 50% from its peak the previous year. Panic occurred, as this was during a time of economic recession, and there were numerous runs on banks and trust companies. The 1907 panic eventually spread throughout the nation when many state and local banks and businesses entered into bankruptcy. Primary causes of the run include a retraction of market liquidity by a number of New York City banks and a loss of confidence among depositors. This is the exact same cause for the current US economic crisis.

Bank of America started today’s crisis by retracting market liquidity in the mortgage sector. Soon after other Federal Reserve banks did the same to exasperate the illusion of a financial crisis. The illusion of bank failures and bankruptcy achieved the Federal Reserve bank’s goal – to have Bush and Obama simply hand over $trillions in federal tax dollars. In both Bush’s Bailout Scheme and Obama’s Stimulus Scheme none of the banks of the Federal Reserve that received $trillions have to repay any of it back. Bush and Obama simply gave it all away with no strings attached. No repayment is required. No accounting of where the money is going is required. No paper trail. Bush and Obama even gave them all a get out of jail free card by declaring that their bailout and stimulus schemes will not be subjected to Judicial or Congressional oversight. Both Bush and Obama made sure this was part of the deal because both received multi $billion kickbacks for their unlawful defrauding of the US people scheme.

The 1907 panic began with a stock manipulation scheme to corner the market in F. Augustus Heinze’s United Copper Company. Heinze had made a fortune as a copper magnate in Butte, Montana. In 1906 he moved to New York City, where he formed a close relationship with notorious Wall Street banker Charles W. Morse. Morse had once successfully cornered New York City’s ice market, and together with Heinze gained control of many banks—the pair served on at least six national banks, ten state banks, five trust companies and four insurance firms.

Augustus’s brother, Otto, devised the scheme to corner United Copper, believing that the Heinze family already controlled a majority of the company. A significant number of the Heinzes’ shares had been borrowed, and Otto believed that many of these had been loaned to investors who hoped the stock price would drop, and that they could thus repurchase the borrowed shares cheaply, pocketing the difference—a technique known as short selling. Otto proposed a short squeeze, whereby the Heinzes would aggressively purchase as many remaining shares as possible, and then force the short sellers to pay for their borrowed shares. The aggressive purchasing would drive up the share price, and, being unable to find shares elsewhere, the short sellers would have no option but to turn to the Heinzes, who could then name their price.

Bush and Obama’s bailout recipients. Most of which were in the “derivatives mess”.

BNP Paribas Securities Corp.
Banc of America Securities LLC
Barclays Capital Inc.
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
Daiwa Securities America Inc.
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.
Jefferies & Company, Inc.
J. P. Morgan Securities Inc.
Lehman Bros.
Mizuho Securities USA Inc.
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
Nomura Securities International, Inc.
RBC Capital Markets Corporation
RBS Securities Inc.
UBS Securities LLC.

Now compare this list to the list of banks that make up the US Federal Reserve. The US Federal Reserve banks are the majority receivers of Bush and Obama’s tax dollar give away scheme.

US Federal Reserve Banks

* Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC - headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland. Formerly known as Schweizerische Kreditanstalt with links to Nazi Third Reich. In 1940 opened its first branch outside Switzerland (in New York). Involved in “laddering” stocks. This means selling a buyer a set number of stocks before they go public on the condition that they buy an equal amount once they do go public. This benefits the buyer because they get a good deal on the pre-market stocks and the guaranteed sale temporarily inflates the stock price for the securities firm. Accused of “spinning” stocks, or giving certain privileged clients (usually executives of top investment banking clients) access to new stock before they hit the market. The client can sell them for a large return in the first busy day or two of trading. In exchange, Credit Suisse Securities gets their investment banking business and heavy transaction fees.

* Daiwa Securities America Inc. - in 1998 was sanctioned for violating anti-fraud and compensation disclosure rules. NASD Regulation began its investigation of Daiwa in July 1996, shortly after receiving an internal Daiwa memorandum outlining an overcharging scheme. NASD Regulation found that, from July 1987 to December 1991, Daiwa’s Los Angeles branch office told customers that their buy orders had been executed at a price higher than the actual purchase price, and their sell orders had been executed at a price lower than the actual sale price. The firm kept the undisclosed difference as “secret profits.” NASD Regulation found that the Los Angeles branch office – which closed in August 1995 – reported either higher or lower executions in approximately 265 out of 570 transactions, resulting in $306,000 in illicit profits

* Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. - used the aggressive expansion of the German Reich into Austria and the Czech lands in order to acquire new branches in those areas and holdings in banks already operating there. Knowingly purchased gold taken from the victims of Nazi concentration camps. By the time the war ended, almost all account assets and deposits held by Jewish customers had been transferred to the German Reich.

* Lehman Brothers Inc. forced into bankruptcy to start the Federal Reserve banking panic scheme.

* Dresdner Kleinwort Securities LLC. - They and Deutsche Bank AG did a lot of business with the Third Reich. Both bought 4,446 kilograms of gold from the Reichsbank, the central bank of Nazi Germany. The gold was worth just over $5 million at the time. Of those purchases, the bank acquired at least 744 kilograms of “Melmer gold,” taken from concentration camp victims and later recast into bullion bars under the direction of the SS officer Bruno Melmer.

* Goldman, Sachs & Co. - Goldman Sachs was founded in 1869 by German Jewish immigrant Marcus Goldman. In 1882, Goldman’s son-in-law Samuel Sachs joined the firm which prompted the name change to Goldman Sachs. On December 4, 1928, it launched the Goldman Sachs Trading Corp. a closed-end fund with characteristics similar to that of a Ponzi scheme. The fund helped bring about the Stock Market Crash of 1929. Today we have history repeating as they created TARP - The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) is a program of the United States government to purchase assets and equity from financial institutions to strengthen its financial sector. It is the largest component of the government’s measures in 2008 to address the subprime mortgage crisis. The fund was set up by former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (former CEO of Goldman Sachs) which economists believe was pushing the US towards another Stock Market Crash of 2009.

* Greenwich Capital Markets Inc. - Effective April 1, 2009, Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., was renamed “RBS Securities Inc.”

* HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. - the U.S. home- lending unit for Europe’s biggest bank, went to trial on claims that a corporate predecessor hid predatory lending from shareholders. Plaintiffs claim the suit may be worth $1 billion. Paid a record $484 million fine in October 2002 to settle a dozen states’ claims it deceived borrowers about the terms of their mortgages. The company charged some clients double their promised interest by adding insurance and other costs, according to Michigan Attorney General Jennifer Granholm, who is now governor. “The company estimated that it had overcharged customers approximately $3.2 billion” and inflated its reported profits between 1999 and 2001, Dowd, the plaintiffs’ attorney, said in a pretrial court filing. HSBC Holdings’ profit fell last year to $5.7 billion from $19.1 billion because of claimed subprime losses.

* J. P. Morgan Securities Inc. - hostile takeover of Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. J.P. Morgan created and controlled Mahonia Ltd., an energy trading business. A venture company created in December of 1992, Mahonia operated out of the Channel Islands in the UK. Sixty percent of its transactions were made with Enron. These transactions were originally made by Enron in an attempt to defer taxes, but as the company’s debt increased, and the energy industry continued to experience losses, the transactions became a means to finance its operations. As the operator of Mahonia, J.P. Morgan faced major losses when Enron declared bankruptcy. The firm sought $1.1 billion from Enron’s insurers to cover losses it suffered through the pre-paid energy trades. Enron’s insurance companies, however, argued that they shouldn’t have to pay. Their argument centered on the assertion that the ‘trades’ that they had insured had turned out to be “disguised loans.” Their commitment to provide “absolute and unconditional” coverage, they stressed, did not apply toward covering “fraud.” They held that J.P. Morgan had conspired with Enron to hide the company’s debt by giving it loans masked as pre-paid energy trades with Mahonia. Their allegations raise questions as to why J.P. Morgan would have helped Enron hide its debt, and how supporting Enron could have benefited J.P. Morgan.

* Mizuho Securities USA Inc.

* Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated - conflicts of interest regarding a number of different companies. Morgan Stanley stock fraud actions involved client companies such as Gucci, and investigators claim that Morgan Stanley stock fraud were specifically designed to influence investment banking business with specific clients. Additionally, Morgan Stanley stock fraud is suspected in association with overvalued telecom stocks, and also in conjunction with Enron. Morgan Stanley stock fraud accusations have led to federal investigations related to failure to follow SEC required records-keeping. Morgan Stanley stock fraud plans were allegedly designed to benefit those companies who did business with the investment bank; Morgan Stanley stock fraud schemes were designed to deceive the investors, according to the investigators, who claim that Morgan Stanley stock frauds created false values, driving stock prices up or down according to their relationship with each company. The FBI has announced that former key executive for Morgan Stanley, Darin Demizio, will serve 38 months imprisonment and three years of supervised release for conspiring to commit securities fraud and wire fraud. Mr. Demizio routinely directed business from Morgan Stanley’s securities lending division to smaller brokerage firms for kickbacks that were paid to his father and Craig DeMizio, his brother. The amount of the kickbacks was over $1.6 million from 2000 – 2004.

* Nomura Securities International, Inc. - accused of conducting securities transactions through an agent whose record-keeping practices led to an erroneous transfer of funds attributable to dividend payments. Further, the Statement of Claim filed against petitioner alleged that petitioner violated “industry practice” by failing to return or to cause the return of these dividend payments.

* UBS Securities LLC. also linked to the Nazi Third Reich. In July 2008 the attorney general of New York accused UBS of consumer and securities fraud, saying the bank had misled investors when it sold them auction-rate securities. Auction-rate securities are preferred shares or debt instruments with rates that reset regularly, usually every week, in auctions overseen by the brokerage firms that originally sold them. But the $300 billion market for these instruments collapsed in February, trapping investors who had been told that they were safe and easy to cash in.Even as a senior executive at UBS called the market “a complete loser,” the bank continued to pitch the securities as short-term, liquid investments, according to the civil complaint filed by Andrew M. Cuomo, attorney general of New York.At the same time, seven executives at the bank sold their personal holdings of the securities, which totaled $21 million, to avoid losses, according to the complaint. “Once they knew the auctions were failing, they removed their personal money and corporate money from the auctions and were still bringing consumers into the auctions,” Mr. Cuomo said.

In 1907 a group of bankers conspired to create a fictional banking crisis in order to coerce the US Congress into forming the US Federal Reserve - a banking system of private bankers with complete control over the US. If you control a country’s money you control the country. Today the same group has orchestrated another banking crisis in order to form the World Monetary Fund - a banking system of private bankers with complete financial control over the World. How do we stop them? We shut them down. We invest in other banks or form completely new banks. We take our money out of their banks and put them in other locally owned banks. Most importantly have no part in the World Monetary Fund because if you do you no longer have a sovereign state.

“They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; the rich and predatory money lenders. This is an era of economic misery and for the reasons that caused that misery, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks are fully liable.” ~ Rep. Louis T. McFadden (R. Pa.) statement in regards to the Federal Reserve banks

How can the US taxpayers stop financing those whose purpose it is to destroy the United States?

To avert another financial crisis in the United States “ the Federal Reserve Act must be repealed and the Federal Reserve banks, having violated their charters, should be liquidated immediately.

Replace the counterfeit FED money (interest attached) for real U.S. money (interest-free) dollar for dollar, as Kennedy tried to do. The US people should not be required to pay interest on their own currency. According to Benjamin Franklin, this was one of the primary reasons “the people” fought the Revolutionary War. Today they are still fighting the same family of foreign bankers.

The U.S. Government can buy back the FED at any time for $450 million (per Congressional record). The U.S. Treasury could then collect all the profit on US money instead of the 300 original shareholders of the FED. The $13+ trillion of U.S. debt could be converted dollar for dollar with U.S. non-interest bearing currency when the debt becomes due. There would be no inflation because there would be no additional currency in circulation. Personal income tax could be cut if the US government got rid of the FED and therefore, the economy would expand. According to the Constitution, only Congress is to control the creation of money, keeping the amount of inflation or deflation in check. If Congress isn’t doing their job, they should be voted out of office. Unfortunately, voters can’t vote the unelected FED or its Chairman out of office.

If the government has a deficit, the United States government could handle it as Lincoln and Kennedy did. By printing interest-free United States Notes instead of the illegal interest-bearing counterfeit called the Federal Reserve Note.. Today the FED, through foreign banks, owns much of the US debt and therefore controls the United States. The FED will cease to exist as taxpayers become informed and tell other taxpayers.

By law (check the Congressional record), the US people can takeover the FED for the original investment of the FED’s 300 shareholders, which is $450 million. If each taxpayer paid $25, they could takeover the FED and all the profit would flow into the U.S. Treasury. In other words, by Congress allowing the constitutionally illegal FED to continue, much of your taxes go to the shareholders of the FED and their foreign bankers.

Note: The people who illegally enacted the FED also illegally created the IRS, within months of the FED’s inception. The FED buys U.S. debt with counterfeit money they print from nothing (meaning they have no value - worthless), then charges the U.S. taxpayers interest. The government had to create a tax - income tax - to pay the interest expense to the FED’s foreign shareholders, but the income tax was never legally passed. The FED is illegal, per Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. Not one state legally ratified the 16th Amendment making income tax legal.

If the FED was eliminated and the US government uphold the Constitution, the US could balance the budget and cut personal income tax to almost nothing. In Congressional hearings on September 30, 1941, FED Chairman Eccles admitted that the FED creates new money from thin air (printing press), and loans it back to the US people at interest. On June 6, 1960, FED President Mr. Allen admitted essentially the same thing. If you or I did this we would be arrested for counterfeiting and put in jail.

It is time to abolish the Federal Reserve Bank’s control of the United States. It is time to stop the Federal Reserve Bankers from printing of the US money and creating the US debt! The US people don’t even need to buy back the FED. They only need to print money the way the United Constitution requires - by Congress, interest free.

On March 24, 1999 the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) launched an illegal and unprovoked War of aggression against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. NATO did not have any authorization from the UN Security Council to carry out this aggression.

Not only did the aggression violate the UN Charter, but also many international covenants pertaining to the rules of war. NATO deliberately targeted civilians, not even hospitals were spared from NATO’s criminal attacks. In fact, NATO managed to destroy more hospitals than Yugoslav Army tanks.

On October 7, 2001 NATO launched another illegal and unprovoked War of aggression against the sovereign state of Afghanistan. Afghanistan did not attack any country, not on September 11, 2001, not prior to that date and not since that date. Afghanistan was a poor defenseless state that was and continues to be a victim of war crimes committed by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). These are the same crimes that their leaders committed in World War II. NATO is the army that was created by Nazi war criminals. Their mission is the establishment of the Fourth Reich. They have and continue to commit crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and war crimes with the help of US, Canadian, Russian, English, French and other former Nazi occupied countries to build a new Nazi controlled empire.

In terms of neo-Nazism, the Fourth Reich is envisioned as featuring Aryan supremacy, anti-Semitism, Lebensraum, aggressive militarism and totalitarianism. Subsequently, neo-Nazis believe that this rise would pave the way for the establishment of the Western Imperium, a pan-Aryan world empire encompassing lands with prominent European descended peoples (Europe, Russia, Anglo-America, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Southern South America, and other significantly white countries in Latin America). The Fourth Reich began with formation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The wars of the Fourth Reich began immediately after the reunification of Germany.

In his book, The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America, Jim Marrs argues that some surviving members of Germany’s Third Reich, along with sympathizers in the United States and elsewhere, given safe haven by organizations like ODESSA and Die Spinne, have been working behind the scenes since the end of World War II to enact at least some of the principles of Nazism (e.g. militarism, fascism, conquest, widespread spying on citizens, use of corporations and propaganda to control national interests and ideas) into culture, government, and business worldwide. He cites the influence of Nazis brought into the United States at the end of World War II, such as Nazi scientists brought in under Operation Paperclip to help advance aerospace in the US, and the acquisition and creation of conglomerates by Nazis and their sympathizers after the war, in both Europe and the US - the largest of which is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

America became the soldiers of the Nazi Fourth Reich on September 11, 2001.

When the World Trade Towers collapsed, most Americans simply refused to believe suggestions that the attacks had been staged by parties working for the US Government itself. Americans were afraid to, even as news reports surfaced proving that the US Government had announced plans for the invasion of Afghanistan months before the attacks on September 11, 2001 even took place. The United States government made plans and announced their intention to the World early in the year, plans into which the attacks on the World Trade Towers which angered the American people into support of the already-planned war fit entirely too conveniently.

So trapped are Americans by their belief in their own bravery that they will themselves to be blind to the evidence before their eyes, so that they can nod in agreement with the government while still imagining themselves to have courage, even as they avoid the one situation which most requires real courage; to stand up to the government’s lies and deceptions. The vast majority of the American people, their own self-image dependent on continuing blindness to the government’s deceptions, never question why Afghanistan would have done something so stupid as to attack the United States, and as a result, Americans find themselves in a war. Even after being presented with the facts that no Afghan citizen, political official or military personnel took part in either the planning of the attacks on September 11, 2001 or the execution of the attacks. The United States government even published the names and nationalities of the hijackers and mastermind of the attack. The majority were Saudi nationals. bin Laden is also a Saudi national.

Even with all the evidence exonerating (to free from blame) Afghanistan of any crime against the United States the US government granted themselves temporary extraordinary powers, powers specifically banned under Constitutional law, but powers the government claimed they need to have to deal with the “terrorists”. The American people, too stupid to see that they have been grossly deceived by their government have agreed with their government’s lies and contradictions. Because Americans are too stupid and gullible those temporary illegal powers are now no more temporary in America than they were in Germany when Nazi ideologist, Adolf Hitler burned down the Reichstag building (the parliament building of the German Empire) and blamed it on “terrorists” they called communists. The destruction of the building gave Hitler the excuse for the Nazis to suspend most rights provided for by Germany’s 1919 constitution in an effort by Hitler to increase state security throughout Germany. 68 years later and history was repeated when the United States government attacked the United States on September 11, 2001 and in order to grant themselves illegal extraordinary powers that illegally suspended the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights (an illegal suspension that continues to this day) and they blamed the attacks on “terrorists” they called Al Qaeda.

The US Government knows they rule a nation of cowards. The government has had to spend the money to make the new war something cowards can fight. The government has decorated the troops with regalia to make them proud of themselves, further trapping them in their self-image.

Finally, knowing that it takes courage to kill the enemy face to face, the United States government has spent vast sums of money on wonder weapons, airplanes, submarines, ultra-long range artillery, cruise missiles, and guided missiles, weapons that kill at a distance, so that those doing the killing need not have to face the reality of what they are doing.

Hitler was TIME Magazine’s Man Of The Year in 1938. Stalin was TIME Magazine’s Man Of The Year for 1939 and 1942. Both of these men, and many others also celebrated by the media, were unimaginable monsters. The lesson from these facts is that it isn’t easy to spot a genocidal tyrant when you live with one, especially one whom the press supports and promotes.

Tyrants become obvious only when looking back, after what they have done becomes known. The German people did not stand up to Hitler because their media betrayed them, just as the American media is betraying the American people by willingly, voluntarily, even proudly, abandoning its traditional role as watchdog against government abuse.

It is the very nature of power that it attracts the sort of people who should not have it. The United States, as the world’s last superpower, is a prize that attracts men and women willing to do absolutely anything to win that power, and hence are also willing to do absolutely anything with that power once they have it. If one thinks about it long enough, one will realize that all tyrants, past and most especially present, MUST use deception on their population to initiate a war.

No citizen of a modern industrialized nation will send their children off to die in a war to grab another nation’s resources and assets, yet resources and assets are what all wars are fought over. The nation that wishes to initiate a war of conquest must create the illusion of an attack or a threat to start a war, and must always give their population of cowards an excuse never to question that carefully crafted illusion.
It is naive, not to mention racist to assume that tyrants appear only in other nations and that somehow America is immune simply because we’re Americans. America has escaped the clutches of a dictatorship thus far only through the efforts of those citizens who, unlike the Germans of the 1930s, have the moral courage to stand up and point out where the government is lying to the people.

Unless more Americans are willing to have that kind of individual courage, then future generations may well look back on the American people with the same harshness of judgement with which we look back on the 1930s Germans.

As a primary source of international law, the judgment of the Nuremberg Tribunal in the 1945-1946 case of the major Nazi war criminals is plain and clear. Our leaders often invoke and praise that judgment, but obviously have not read it. The International Court declared:

“To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime, it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

At Nuremberg, the United States and Britain pressed the prosecution of Nazi leaders for planning and initiating aggressive war. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, the head of the American prosecution staff, asserted “that launching a war of aggression is a crime and that no political or economic situation can justify it.” He also declared that “if certain acts in violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.”

The United Nations Charter views aggression similarly. Articles 2(4) and (7) prohibit interventions in the domestic jurisdiction of any country and threats of force or the use of force by one state against another. The General Assembly of the UN in Resolution 2131, “Declaration on the Inadmissibility of Intervention,” reinforced the view that a forceful military intervention in any country is aggression and a crime without justification.

Putting a “NATO” label on aggressive policy and conduct does not give that conduct any sanctity. This is simply a perversion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, supposedly formed as a defensive alliance under the UN Charter. The North Atlantic Treaty pledged its signatories to refrain from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations, and it explicitly recognized “the primary responsibility of the Security Council (of the United Nations) for the maintenance of international peace and security.” Obviously, in bypassing UN approval for attacking and occupying the former Yugoslavia and now Afghanistan, the U.S. and NATO have violated this basic obligation.

From another standpoint of international law, the current conduct of military aggressive armed attacks by the United States and NATO constitutes a continuing war crime. Contrary to the beliefs of our war planners, unrestricted air bombing is barred under international law. Bombing the “infrastructure” of a country’s waterworks, electricity plants, bridges, factories, television and radio locations are not attacks limited to legitimate military objectives. US and NATO attacks has also caused an excessive loss of life and injury to civilians, which violates another standard. We have now killed hundreds, if not thousands, of innocent and defenseless civilians.

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 - A report written in 1996 (under the Clinton Administration) for the United States Air Force states: “In 2025, US aerospace forces can “own the weather” by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.”

A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather-modification system could provide to a war-fighting commander in chief (CINC) are listed in table 1.

Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather-modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.

Table 1 - Operational Capabilities Matrix

DEGRADE ENEMY FORCES	ENHANCE FRIENDLY FORCES
Precipitation Enhancement	Precipitation Avoidance
- Flood Lines of Communication	- Maintain/Improve LOC
- Reduce PGM/Recce Effectiveness	- Maintain Visibility
- Decrease Comfort Level/Morale	- Maintain Comfort Level/Morale
Storm Enhancement	Storm Modification
- Deny Operations	- Choose Battlespace Environment
Precipitation Denial	Space Weather
- Deny Fresh Water	- Improve Communication Reliability
-- Induce Drought	- Intercept Enemy Transmissions
Space Weather	- Revitalize Space Assets
- Disrupt Communications/Radar	Fog and Cloud Generation
- Disable/Destroy Space Assets	- Increase Concealment
Fog and Cloud Removal	Fog and Cloud Removal
- Deny Concealment	- Maintain Airfield Operations
- Increase Vulnerability to PGM/Recce	- Enhance PGM Effectiveness
Detect Hostile Weather Activities	Defend against Enemy Capabilities

Current technologies that will mature over the next 30 years will offer anyone who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather patterns and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability.

In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather-modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance air and space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness. “The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;” in 2025 we can “Own the Weather.”

A Research Paper presented to Air Force by Col Tamzy J. House, Lt Col James B. Near, Jr., LTC William B. Shields (USA), Maj Ronald J. Celentano, Maj David M. Husband, Maj Ann E. Mercer, and Maj James E. Pugh in August 1996.

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 - is a study to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense.

Today, not in 2025, the United States has the technology to “Own the Weather”, and they are now actively using it. The technology is called HAARP - High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. Their website states only their official version of what HAARP is doing but US military documents and HAARP’s own data reveals HAARP’s real purpose - environmental warfare - manipulating global weather for US geopolitical gain.

The Schutzstaffel (Protection Squadron), abbreviated SS—or Runic “↯↯” — was a major paramilitary organization formed in 1925 as a personal protection guard unit for Adolf Hitler. After the Nazi seizure of power, the mission of the SS expanded from the protection of the person of Adolf Hitler to the internal security of the Nazi regime. Built upon the Nazi ideology, the SS, under Heinrich Himmler’s command, grew from a small paramilitary formation to one of the largest and most powerful organizations in the Third Reich - a huge force of thirty-eight combat divisions comprising over 950,000 men.

The Waffen-SS (”Armed Protective Squadron”) was the combat arm of the Schutzstaffel (SS). Commanded by Heinrich Himmler who was ranked Reichsführer-SS (National Leader of the SS), the Waffen-SS fought and killed Allied forces throughout the Second World War.

The original cadre of the Waffen-SS came from the Freikorps and the Reichswehr along with various right-wing paramilitary formations. Formed at the instigation of Heinrich Himmler, the Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler (LSSAH) was the first formation of what was to become the Waffen-SS. When the SA (Sturmabteilung - Storm Troops)was rendered powerless in the Night of the Long Knives, many ex-SA men requested transfer to the SS, swelling its ranks and resulting in the formation of several new units including the SS-Verfügungstruppe (to become the SS Division Das Reich) and the SS-Totenkopfverbände (to become the SS Division Totenkopf and also the concentration camp guard unit).

According to the Nuremberg Trials, as well as countless war crimes investigations and trials conducted over the past sixty years, the SS was responsible for the vast majority of war crimes perpetrated under the Nazi regime, including most notoriously at Oradour-sur-Glane, Marzabotto and in the Malmedy massacre. Chosen to implement the Nazi “Final Solution” for the Jews and other groups deemed inferior (and/or enemies of the state), the SS was the lead branch in carrying out the killing, torture and enslavement of approximately twelve million people. Most victims were Jews or of Polish or other Slavic extraction. However, other racial/ethnic groups such as the Rroma made up a significant number of victims, as well. Furthermore, the SS purge was extended to those viewed as threats to “race hygiene” or Nazi ideology—including the mentally or physically handicapped, homosexuals, or political dissidents. Members of labor organizations and those perceived to be affiliated with groups (religious, political, social and otherwise) that opposed the regime, or were seen to have views contradictory to the goals of the Nazi government, were rounded up in large numbers; these included clergy of all faiths, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Freemasons, Communists, and Rotary Club members.

Himmler begins forming a SS military force of foreign volunteers and conscripts

As WWII escalated Himmler, wanted to expand the Waffen-SS and advocated the idea of SS controlled foreign legions (NATO is that SS controlled foreign legion). The Reichsführer, with his penchant for medieval lore, envisioned a united european ‘crusade’, fighting to save old Europe from the ‘Godless bolshevik hordes’ (the communist Soviet Union). While volunteers from regions which had been declared Aryan were approved almost instantly, Himmler eagerly pressed for the creation of more and more foreign units.

In late 1940, the creation of a multinational SS division, the Wiking, was authorized. Command of the division was given to SS-Brigadeführer Felix Steiner. Steiner immersed himself in the organization of the volunteer division, soon becoming a strong advocate for an increased number of foreign units. The Wiking was committed to combat several days after the launch of Operation Barbarossa, proving itself an impressive fighting unit.

Soon, Danish, Flemish, Norwegian and Dutch freiwilligen (volunteer) formations were committed to combat, gradually proving their worth. As the success of his experiment became apparent, the Reichsführer began to look for recruits from further afeild, planning the formation of legions from ethnic groups viewed as inferior to the Nordic races of Northern Europe.

Hitler however, was hesitant to allow foreign volunteers to be formed into formations based on their ethnicity, preferring that they be absorbed into multi-national divisions. Hitler feared that unless the foreign recruits were committed to the Nazi idea of a united Germania, then their reasons for fighting were suspect, and could damage the Nazi German cause. Despite Hitler’s fear and initial opposition Himmler was allowed to create his new formations, but they were to be commanded by German officers and NCOs. Himmler’s goal was to acquire additional combat manpower from occupied nations. Beginning in 1942-43, several new formations were formed from Latvians, Estonians, Ukrainians and even Bosnians. The Reichsführer had sidestepped the race laws by ordering that Waffen-SS units formed with men from non-Aryan backgrounds were to be designated division der SS (or Division of the SS) rather than SS Division. The wearing of the SS runes on the collar was forbidden, with several of these formations wearing a national insignia instead.

All non-Germanic officers and men in these units had their rank prefix changed from SS to Waffen (e.g. a Latvian Hauptscharführer would be referred to as a Waffen-Hauptscharführer rather than SS-Hauptscharführer). An example of a division der SS is the Estonian Waffen-Grenadier-Division der SS (estnische Nr.1). The combat ability of the divisions der SS varied greatly, with the Latvian, French and Estonian formations performing exceptionally and the Croatian and Albanian units performing poorly.

While many adventurers and idealists joined the SS as part of the fight against communism, many of the later recruits joined or were conscripted for different reasons. For example, Dutchmen who joined the SS-Freiwilligen-Grenadier-Division Landstorm Nederland were granted exemption from forced labour and provided with food, pay and accommodation. Recruits who joined for such reasons rarely proved good soldiers, and several units composed of such volunteers were involved in atrocities.

Towards the end of 1943, it became apparent that numbers of volunteer recruits were inadequate to meet the needs of the German military campaigns, so conscription was introduced. The Estonian Waffen-Grenadier-Division der SS (estnische Nr.1) is an example of such a conscript formation, which proved to be outstanding soldiers with an unblemished record.

Not satisfied with the growing number of volunteer formations, Himmler sought to gain control of all volunteer forces serving alongside Germany. This put the SS at odds with the Heer, as several volunteer units had been placed under Heer (German Regular Army) control (e.g. all Spanish volunteers of the Spanish Blue Division fell under Heer control). Despite this, Himmler constantly campaigned to have all foreign volunteers fall under the SS banner. In several cases, like the ROA and the SS-Freiwilligen-Sturmbrigade Wallonien he was successful, and by the last year of the war, most foreign volunteers units did fall under SS command.

While several volunteer units performed poorly in combat, the majority acquitted themselves well. French and Spanish SS volunteers, along with remnants of the SS-Freiwilligen-Panzergrenadier-Division Nordland formed the final defense of the Reichstag in 1945.

Multinational Waffen-SS war criminals form NATO

After the surrender of Germany, many multinational SS volunteers and conscripts were tried and imprisoned by their countries. In several cases, volunteers were executed as traitors. Multinational SS volunteers from the Baltic States and Ukraine were to be sent to Soviet penal labour camps. To avoid this, many ex-multinational SS from these regions joined underground resistance groups which were engaged fighting the Soviets until the 1950s. Many other Waffen-SS volunteers, including many Wiking veterans, avoided punishment by joining the French Foreign Legion. It is estimated that out of roughly 70,000 members of the SS involved in war crimes in German concentration camps, only between 1650 and 1700 were tried after the war. Many fled to Nazi sympathizer countries. Most, however, went on to form and control the new Nazi SS combat arm called NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization). The new multinational Waffen-SS organization called NATO was allowed to be formed with the full support the United States and England. Both the United States and England helped the multinational SS officers create NATO because of the communist threat from the Soviet Union.

The target of the post WWII Nazi multinational Waffen-SS forces (NATO), the United States and England is one and the same - the Soviet Union. Since the enemy is the same and the new combat force was created by and with former Nazi Waffen-SS officers and soldiers NATO is the continuation of the combat arm of the Nazi Schutzstaffel (SS) - the Waffen-SS. Remember that the Bolsheviks defeated Nazi Germany in WWII. The SS was disgraced for it could not fulfill its namesake - Protection Squadron as the Bolsheviks (Soviet Union) drove back the elite Nazi Waffen-SS all the way back to Berlin. Since the fall of Germany and the Nazi ideology of a united Europe the goal of the surviving members of the Waffen-SS has been to defeat the Bolsheviks - Russians.

Today the new multinational Waffen-SS army called NATO is massed along the Bolsheviks borders. They are quietly preparing for an all out war against the Bolsheviks. The first battle between the multinational Waffen-SS army called NATO and the Bolsheviks began on March 24, 1999 when NATO attacked and now occupies Yugoslavia. Then on October 7, 2001 the multinational Waffen-SS forces attacked and now occupies Afghanistan - which also borders modern Bolshevik (Russia). Both wars were wars of aggression and war crimes. Both committed by the new multinational Waffen-SS army called NATO.

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. This Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.

When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110 gave back to the Treasury Department the explicit authority: “to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury.” This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury’s vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. The $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.

“United States Notes” were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a “Federal Reserve Note” issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a “United States Note” from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy’s Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says “Federal Reserve Note” on the top while the other says “United States Note”. Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.

President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper “currency” circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes - all illegal counterfeits.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The United States Notes was backed by silver and the Federal Reserve Notes was not backed by anything of intrinsic value - making the Federal Reserve Notes worthless, even today.

Executive Order 11110 would have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create worthless counterfeit “money”. Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and real value worth something.

Americans would not pay income tax and the middle class and low-middle class would see more of their hard earned money. Their standard of living could finally be with-out debt since all their income taxes do is pay off the national debt which is created be the government taking loans and paying interest to the illegal Federal Reserve Banking system. The Supreme law of the United States of America, the U.S. Constitution, Article 1 Section 8:

The Congress shall have Power … To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

The power to coin money and to regulate the value thereof was illegal taken away from Congress and given to the unelected private bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks. It is within the power of the United States Congress to take back that right and to punish the bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks for illegally counterfeiting the securities and lawful coin of the United States. Executive Order 11110 is still valid and as such the US Congress and the United States president is legally bound to carry out that order. The bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks are all crooks and they have been robbing the United States people. The largest robbery in the United States history was carried out by the bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks. They stole $trillions from the people of the United States in 2 elaborate fraudulent bailout schemes.

The bankers of the illegal Federal Reserve Banks need to be put out of the business of defrauding the United States people. They need to be arrested, charged and punished for their crimes against the United States and the people.

The United States government commits murder against its own people and against foreign nationals on a daily bases. The U.S. government claims that they are legally justified in killing any and all alleged terrorist suspect because they claim to be at war. There is a major problem with the U.S. government’s argument. In order for any country to be exempted from charges of murder a country must formally declare war. The United States has never declared war. The United States has never declared war against Iraq or Afghanistan. That means there is no state of war between the U.S. and Iraq or the U.S. and Afghanistan. That means every life taken by the U.S. and NATO forces is murder.

Murder, as defined in common law countries, is the unlawful killing of another human being with “malice aforethought”. As the loss of a human being inflicts enormous grief upon the individuals close to the victim, as well as the fact that the commission of a murder is highly detrimental to the good order within society, most societies both present and in antiquity have considered it a most serious crime worthy of the harshest of punishment. In the US, a person convicted of murder is typically given a life sentence or even the death penalty for such an act. A person who commits murder is called a murderer.

The elements of common law murder are:

1. the killing
2. of a human being
3. by another human being
4. with malice aforethought - with malice aforethought - originally “malice aforethought” carried its every day meaning - a deliberate and premeditated killing of another motivated by ill will. Murder necessarily required that an appreciable time pass between the formation and execution of the intent to kill. The courts broadened the scope of murder by eliminating the requirement of actual premeditation and deliberation as well as true malice. All that was required for malice aforethought to exist is that the perpetrator act with one of the four states of mind that constitutes “malice.”

The four states of mind recognized as constituting “malice” are:

1. Intent to kill,
2. Intent to inflict grievous bodily harm short of death,
3. Reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life, or
4. Intent to commit a dangerous felony (the “felony-murder” doctrine).

In Abrahamic religions, the prohibition against murder is one of the Ten Commandments given by God to Moses in (Exodus: 20:13) and (Deuteronomy 5:17).

Christian churches have some doctrinal differences about what forms of homicide are prohibited biblically, though all agree murder is.

In Islam according to the Qur’an, one of the greatest sins is to kill a human being who has committed no fault. “For that cause We decreed for the Children of Israel that whosoever killeth a human being for other than manslaughter or corruption in the earth, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind, and whoso saveth the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind.”

According to Blackstone, English common law identified murder as a public wrong. At common law, murder is considered to be malum in se, that is an act which is evil within itself. An act such as murder is wrong/evil by its very nature. And it is the very nature of the act which does not require any specific detailing or definition in the law to consider murder a crime.

Killing of enemy combatants by lawful combatants in accordance with lawful orders in war, although illicit killings within a war constitute murder or homicidal war crimes.

According to evidence collected by the United States intelligence service and the United States law enforcement agencies Iraq and Afghanistan committed no fault against the United States nor against any other country. Iraq and Afghanistan did not attack the United States or any other country, not on September 11, 2001, not prior to 9/11 and not any time after 9/11. The United States attacked Afghanistan and Iraq, not out of self-defense, but with malice aforethought. The United States did petition both the U.S. Congress and the United Nations for a declaration of war but both the U.S. Congress and the UN denied them the legal authority to go to war - a declaration of war was denied. Every life taken since the unprovoked attacks by the U.S. against Afghanistan and Iraq is, according to United States law and foreign state law, murder.

There is and never has been any legal authority given to the United States government to wage war against Afghanistan, Iraq or Pakistan and there is no legal defense for the United States killing of any person they alleged to be terrorists.

Democracy, civilized society, is only valid when the rule of law is adhered to by all. A leader of a democratic country who orders its people to attack and kill any person that has committed no fault is a criminal, a murderer. George W Bush is a mass murderer. Dick Cheney is a mass murderer. Donald Rumsfeld is a mass murderer. Tony Blair is a mass murderer. Barack Hussein Obama is a mass murderer. Robert Gates is a mass murderer. They are all government agents who have intentionally and indiscriminately murdered a large number of people. They have murdered under the false pretense of self-defense. They have murdered under the guise of a declaration of war, a declaration that has never been formally made.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the United States Constitution, sometimes referred to as the War Powers Clause, vests in the Congress the exclusive power to declare war, in the following wording:

Congress shall have Power… “To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;”

The United States government never received the Constitutionally required declaration of war from the U.S. Congress. Instead the United States government declared, without legal authority or right, that they were authorized to use force. Bush didn’t even initially seek Congressional approval to attack Iraq because he believed the authorization Congress provided his father in 1991 for Operation Desert Storm was still good. Bush waged war illegally and both Bush and Obama have committed mass murder.

The United States is no longer a Constitutional Republic. Since Jimmy Carter, the United States government has become nothing more than a gang of murdering thieves. The Supreme law of the United States, the United States Constitution, is no longer relevant on most matters of governing. Presidents, the Congress and the courts have made going to war, once a serious constitutional issue, a purely political question. As a result, in the last half century, the war powers clause of the Constitution has become a nullity, if not a quaint relic. While conservatives often insist on following the letter of the Constitution on most issues, on matters of war they totally ignore it.

That’s a disgrace, because the Framers of the Constitution carefully laid out the decision-making process for war. Pursuant to the document, war is a decision to be made exclusively by the elected representatives of the people - the Congress. Only Congress is authorized to declare war, raise and support armies, provide and maintain a navy, and make the rules for these armed forces. There is nothing vague or unclear about the language in Article I, Section 8, clauses 11-16. There is nothing vague or unclear about the language in U.S. Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 51 > § 1111

§ 1111. Murder

(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing; or committed in the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, escape, murder, kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage, aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse, child abuse, burglary, or robbery; or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or torture against a child or children; or perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree.

Since the turn of the 20th century Canada was there to fight for the freedom of others. For decades the Canadian government sent our people abroad to fight to liberate any country that was being occupied by another aggressive state. For decades Canada sent its people abroad to defend our fellow man’s inalienable right to be free.

Throughout the entire 20th century Canadians were liberators. Canadians were peace keepers. Canadians freed the occupied, the oppressed and the abused. Canadians paid the ultimate sacrifice to liberate others, to bring about peace and to keep that peace. On October 7, 2001 that all ended. On October 7, 2001 the Canadian government conspired with and aided the United States government in an unprovoked war of aggression against a sovereign foreign state. Canada aided the United States government in an armed attack against a country that had nothing to do with the criminal hijacking of US commercial airlines on US soil on September 11, 2001. None of the hijackers were from Afghanistan. None of the planners of the hijacking and attacks were from Afghanistan. The majority of hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, including the accused mastermind - bin Laden.

Because of the criminal act of a war aggression by the Canadian government against one the poorest sovereign foreign states on Earth I will now forever remember that on that day, October 7, 2001, Canada became an aggressor, a destroyer, a butcher, a murderer, a torturer and a war monger. On that day I will remember that Canada sent our people abroad to overthrow by military force the government of a foreign sovereign state. On that day I will remember that Canada sent our people abroad to attack and kill the very poor, defenseless and innocent people of Afghanistan. On that day I will remember that Canada sent our people to Afghanistan to injure and kill women and children. On that day I will forever remember that Canada was no longer a nation of liberators and peace keepers.

Every November 11 prior to 2001 I use to proudly remember all those who paid the ultimate sacrifice so that others could be free. I use to respect the Canadian Armed Forces for the brave, noble, and selfless acts they had done to defend the freedom and sovereignty of Canada and other foreign states. Now every November 11 I will shamefully remember all those innocent people who had their freedom, their homes and their lives taken away by Canadians. Every November 11 I will bow my head in shame for I will remember that my fellow Canadians were sent abroad to attack, to destroy, to occupy, to torture and to kill thousands of poor, defenseless and innocent people.

A highly worrisome, antibiotic-resistant superbug seems to spreading slowly but steadily through Canada.

The Public Health Agency of Canada says eight cases of NDM-1 bacterial infection have now been confirmed, up from three as of late August.

At least five of the eight people had travelled to India or Pakistan, where NDM-1 superbug infections were first discovered and where they are becoming more widespread. Four of the patients spent time in hospital, while the fifth had “contact” with the health-care system.

Two of the infected patients have died, although not directly from NDM-1 bacteria. One was a 76-year-old B.C. woman who died of complications from sepsis, while the other patient, from Quebec, had cancer.

NDM-1 is a gene that renders bacterial infections immune to most, if not all, manufactured antibiotics. The gene, whose full name is New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1, makes the bacteria produce an enzyme that neutralizes the activity of pharmaceutical carbapenem antibiotics, which are the class of “last resort” pharmaceutical antibiotics (drugs) reserved for only the most severe infections.

The gene has been found in several types of bacteria, so far, primarily in bacteria that cause urinary tract infections and some types of pneumonia.

Bacteria carrying the gene were first discovered in hospitals in India and Pakistan. Cases have now been reported in the U.K., Australia, the Netherlands, the United States and Canada, generally among patients who had medical care in India or Pakistan.

Lancet Journal of Infectious Diseases has stated “The potential for wider international spread and for NDM-1 to become endemic worldwide, are clear and frightening.”

Writing in the medical journal Lancet Infectious Diseases, co-authors of the research, Prof Timothy Walsh from Cardiff University, and Prof David Livermore, from the Health Protection Agency report that there have been 37 cases in the UK and warn the bug has ‘alarming potential to spread and diversify’.

A new superbug NDM-1 which is resistant to almost every (manufactured) antibiotic is poised to spread and wreak havoc across the world unless new (manufactured) antibiotics are developed quickly warns the UK Health Protection Agency.

Here is some very good news for the UK Health Protection Agency, the Lancet Journal of Infectious Diseases and the Public Health Agency of Canada. The drug resistant NDM-1 superbug is easily destroyed by Vitamin C. What pharmaceutically (lab) created antibodies can’t do Vitamin C can. What very expensive drugs can’t do nature’s Vitamin C can.

Vitamin C is a key factor in the immune system, including white blood cell function and interferon levels. It combats the effects of free radicals and promotes growth and tissue repair.

Two-time Nobel prize winner, Dr. Linus Pauling was the first to realize vitamin C’s crucial importance in the maintenance of a healthy immune system. In 1970 he proposed that regular intake of vitamin-C in amounts far higher than the officially sanctioned RDA (Recommended Daily Allowance) could help prevent and shorten the duration of the common cold and even prevent them. Although the medical establishment immediately voiced their strong opposition to this idea, many ordinary people believed Dr. Pauling and began taking large amounts of vitamin-C. Most immediately noticed a great decrease in the frequency and severity of their colds

Dr. Pauling recommended vitamin C intakes of 1000 mg/day or more. The official RDA is 60 mg/day (100 mg/day for smokers). So who is right? How much do we need? To answer this question it is crucial to realize that the RDA is not, in anyway, based on what is required for optimum health. The RDA is simply the amount required to avoid scurvy, the most obvious deficiency disease. Actually the RDA is based on the vitamin C content of the average diet. The logic goes somewhat like this: “The average “healthy” North American diet provides about 60 mg/day of vitamin C, so since scurvy is virtually unknown in the USA today 60 mg/day must be adequate.” So much for science!

Many experts are now realizing that the RDA of 60 mg/day is far too low to provide for optimum health and protection against disease. A team of medical researchers at the National Institutes of Health in the USA recently completed a study designed to determine the vitamin C requirements of healthy, young men. They found that a minimum intake of 1000 mg/day was required to completely saturate the blood plasma with vitamin C. They also found that vitamin C should be taken in divided doses throughout the day as urinary excretion increases rapidly when individual doses exceed 500 mg. The researchers conclude that the RDA should be raised to 200 mg/day. This amount of vitamin C can be obtained from a diet containing five daily servings of fresh fruit and vegetables; unfortunately, less than 15 per cent of children and adults in the USA actually consume such a diet.

While 200 mg/day of vitamin C may be sufficient to maintain a reasonable health status in healthy, young men, it is clear that such a relatively low intake is far from adequate for older and sick people. It is also evident that far greater amounts are required to provide optimum protection against degenerative diseases such as cancer and heart disease.

It has long been accepted that a diet rich in vitamin C from fruits and vegetables provides protection against cancer and heart disease. Researchers from the National Institute on Aging report that elderly people who take vitamin C and E supplements have a 50 per cent lower risk of dying prematurely from disease than do people who do not supplement.

A Californian study concluded that people who consume more than 750 mg/day of vitamin C reduce their risk of dying prematurely by 60 per cent. Italian researchers have concluded that older people, especially the sick are exposed to a much higher level of oxidative stress than are younger people and that their low blood levels of vitamin C reflect this. Other research has found that people who suffer from asthma, arthritis, cancer, diabetes, and heart disease have much lower levels of vitamin C in their blood than do healthy people.

Taken in large enough doses, vitamin C revs up your immune system by pumping enough fuel into white blood cells to destroy invading viruses and bacteria.

Vitamin C increases interferon levels and has interferon-like properties itself. It acts as a natural antihistamine that helps dry up watery eyes and reduce nasal and chest congestion. It is also a powerful antioxidant that can help prevent the damage that your body endures when viruses or bacteria attack your immune system.

At the first sign of cold or flu symptoms, take vitamin C with bioflavonoids or rose hips four to six times a day, says Dr. Meletis. “The bioflavonoids and rose hips strengthen the vitamin C’s infection-fighting power by 35 percent,” he says.

German researchers have now demonstrated that a baseline amount of beta-interferon must be active in order for competent immune recognition and response to any viral invader, which of course includes the swine flu (H1N1), the Avian flu and the NDM-1 superbug. One of the many immune roles of vitamin C is to enhance the production of flu virus and superbug killing beta-interferon.

German research helps to clarify one angle of healthy immunity. Certain immune cells must be primed to go into action, and a key sign of their readiness is a small baseline production of beta-interferon. This enables a more vigorous production of interferon upon viral exposure, and they demonstrate that the interferon is specifically used to help your higher-powered immune response actually identify the invader for a targeted immune response. Without adequate interferon there is a delay or inefficiency in recognition, making it more difficult to identify the enemy and mount a response.

Interferon levels are boosted with vitamin C. In fact, it was just a few years ago when a paper was published explaining how vitamin C could contain a world-wide avian flu pandemic (at that time we were more concerned with the bird flu). This comprehensive review paper emphasized the importance of vitamin C in regards to the flu, and a flu pandemic in particular. The research suggests up to 5 grams of vitamin C per day for general health, 1 gram of vitamin C every hour to help fight off a bug, and much higher amounts if a flu bug has gained a toehold in you. There are no dangerous side effects to taking a higher dosage of natural Vitamin C. There are major side effects to increasing the dosage of pharmaceutically made antibodies that we are now told are useless against the alleged superbug that is now spreading around the World.

Public health officials are putting all their eggs in the experimental vaccine basket, a very careless gamble in defense of a flu pandemic. We have always been told to diversify to reduce risk, after all, one plan might not pan out as hoped. It is high time public health officials get rid of their perverted negative view of dietary supplements. Many lives hang in the balance. We are told antibodies do not kill the superbug so the choice for treatment and to kill the bug is obvious - Vitamin C. Vitamin C is truly a wonder nutrient and there is no doubt that many of the serious degenerative diseases plaguing the civilized world today can be prevented or even reversed through an adequate intake of this essential vitamin.

The UN and the World Bank leader are pushing for a new currency. They are calling for a global currency. UN countries should agree on the creation of a global reserve bank to issue the currency and to monitor the national exchange rates of its members, the Geneva-based UN Conference on Trade and Development declared.

UN countries should not agree to such a scheme. No country should even contemplate even the idea of an anti-sovereignty, anti-democratic global currency. Just look at what the EU did to the European countries. The EU dictates the policies of every country that is a member of the EU - all in direct violation of each country’s territorial, political and economic sovereignty. How many of you know that the European Union was devised by the Nazi Party of Adolf Hitler. The concept of a unified Europe was the goal of Adolph Hitler.

Back in 1942, a book called “The European Community” was published. Its principal author, a Doctor of Economics, had argued in 1940 for a “Central European Union” and “European Economic Area” and for fixed exchange rates - EMU in all but name. In this book, he wrote that “No nation in Europe can achieve on its own the highest level of economic freedom which is compatible with all social requirements…The formation of very large economic areas follows a natural law of development….interstate agreements in Europe will control [economic forces generally]…There must be a readiness to subordinate one’s own interests in certain cases to those of [the EC].”

One of his co-authors wrote that the “classic national economy..is dead…community of fate which is the European economy…fate and extent of European co-operation depends on a new unity economic plan”. Another observed that “We have a real European Community task before us…I am convinced that this Community effort will last beyond the end of the war.”

“Beyond the end of the war” explains everything. The principal author was Nazi Economics Minister and war criminal Walther Funk. In 1943, Walther Funk, Nazi Germany’s Minister for Economic Affairs and Head of the Reichsbank, outlined his ideas on the creation of a European economic area controlled by Nazi Germany in his book called “Walther Funk, The economic face of the new Europe”. The other two were respectively Nazi academic Heinrich Hunke and official Gustav Koenig. Nor were they just eccentrics. Goering’s orders in 1940 were followed by a project for the “large-scale economic unification of Europe” Goebbels, in the same year, compared Germany’s road to unification in the nineteenth century with Europe’s in the twentieth, believing that “in fifty years’ time [people] no longer think in terms of countries.”

On Remembrance Day remember the ultimate sacrifice paid by millions - not just military personnel, to stop Hitler from occupying Europe. How many lives were lost liberating the occupied countries of Europe? How many have spilled blood in the fight to restore the sovereignty of those countries? With the European Union, a Nazi ideology, in full control of the sovereign states of Europe, our grandfathers and our brothers have died in vain.

What Germany couldn’t achieve with war they did with the EU.

There is no need for a new global currency. We already have a global currency (the Federal Reserve Note) and the current global economic crisis has proven it doesn’t work. For decades the nations of the World has pegged their currency’s value against the privately owned counterfeit of the the United States Dollar. That counterfeit worthless piece of paper called the Federal Reserve Note is the root cause of the current US and World economic crisis. For decades the nations of the World allowed a small handful of private bankers to dictate the value of their currency and look where it has got them today. For decades the World has already been trading under a global currency - using the worthless counterfeits called the Federal Reserve Notes.

The simplest solution to the current economic crisis and to prevent another in the future is to stop using one nation’s currency for international trade. The solution is trade based on every country’s currency at parity (equal value) with every other country. That is to say that 1 US dollar would have the exact same value as 1 Canadian dollar or 1 Euro or 1 Yen or 1 Pound or … This eliminates one nation having superiority over other nations and eliminates any crisis that would arise should one country collapse as a result of debt, like the US. If every currency is at parity with each other confidence would remain uniform and strong.

Why should one country or an organization like the UN, the EU, the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank have control over the money of any other sovereign state? None have any authority over any country or each country’s people. Organizations like the UN, the WHO, the IMF, NATO and the EU should be banned. They are individuals who think that they can simply ignore the borders of each country, the sovereignty of each country and the economic prosperity of each country. They are all anti-Democratic. They are all anti-sovereignty.

During the Civil War (from 1861-1865), President Lincoln needed money to finance the War from the North. The Bankers were going to charge him 24% to 36% interest. Lincoln was horrified and went away greatly distressed, for he was a man of principle and would not think of plunging his beloved country into a debt that the country would find impossible to pay back.

Eventually President Lincoln was advised to get Congress to pass a law authorizing the printing of full legal tender Treasury notes to pay for the War effort. Lincoln recognized the great benefits of this issue. At one point hi wrote:

“… (we) gave the people of this Republic the greatest blessing they have ever had - their own paper money to pay their own debts…”

The Treasury notes were printed with green ink on the back, so the people called them “Greenbacks”.

Lincoln printed 400 million dollars worth of Greenbacks (the exact amount being $449,338,902), money that he delegated to be created, a bebt-free and interest-free money to finance the War. It served as legal tender for all debts, public and private. He printed it, paid it to the soldiers, to the U.S. Civil Service empoyees, and bought supplies for war.

Shortly after that happened, “The London Times” printed the following:

“if that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in th history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”

The Bankers obviously understood. The only thing that is a threat to their power is sovereign governments printing interest-free and debt-free paper money. They know it would break the power of the international Bankers.

After this was published in “The London Times”, the British Government, which was controlled by the London and other European Bankers, moved to support the Confederate South, hoping to defeat Lincoln and the Union, and destroy this government which they said had to be destroyed. But the North won the War, and the Union was preserved. America remained as one nation.

Of course, the Bankers were not going to give in that easy, for they were determined to put an end to Lincoln’s interest-free, debt-free Greenbacks. He was assassinated by an agent of the Bankers shortly after the War ended.

Thereafter, the Bankers controlled Congress revoked the Greenback Law and enacted, in its place, the National Banking Act. The national banks were to be privately owned (to this day they are still privately owned by the bankers of the Federal Reserve) and the national bank notes they issued were to be interest-bearing (to this day the privately owned Federal Reserve charges the United States people interest to print the worthless, illegal counterfeits called the Federal Reserve Notes). The Act also provided that the Greenbacks should be retired from circulation as soon as they came back to the Treasury in payment of taxes.

Former elected president of the United States, John F Kennedy, tried to warn the American people about this secretive organization that ruled the United States. He even tried to give the United States back to the people by abolishing the illegal Federal Reserve Act and taking the worthless counterfeit called the Federal Reserve Note out of circulation. Kennedy was assassinated for the same reason Lincoln was assassinated - for trying to get rid of the illegal Federal Reserve Banks and their illegal control of the United States money and bring back the legal interest free currency of the United States called the United States Dollar.

US Global Domination

How many know that the UN, the WHO, the IMF and NATO were all created by the United States? They were created as instruments for a US global domination of the World. They all were created by and are financed by the same bankers who illegally took control of the United States with the worthless interest bearing counterfeits called the Federal Reserve Note. The UN, the WHO, the IMF and NATO do whatever the US government (controlled by International bankers) tells them to do. They dictate US foreign policies. Every country that supports the UN, the WHO, the IMF and NATO are giving their political, territorial and economic sovereignty to the unelected shadow government of the United States. Not only should every country drop the worthless and illegal Federal Reserve Note as the main reserve currency but they should all withdraw their support for the UN, the WHO, the IMF, NATO and every organization that threatens their territorial, political and economic sovereignty - that includes the G8, G20 and the EU.

The World under economic slavery

Freedom from slavery is an internationally recognized human right. Article 4 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.” Economic slavery is what the UN, the IMF, the EU and the G20 have in mind for the World population - slavery is sought by these organizations as a legal institution or socio-economic system. The US is the perfect example of a government imposing a socio-economic slavery upon its citizens. The US government has been spending millions to brainwash the American people into believing that the US economic system is an exercise of free enterprise and that they are spending $trillions in support of free enterprise. That is totally false. The US abandoned free enterprise long ago in the aftermath of WW I in favor of Mussolini’s “corporatism,” i.e., economic fascism, where Big Business, Big Government, and Big Finance form combines to exploit the people with monopolized prices and a corrupted currency. Since Obama became the first non-American to become the president of the United States of America he has made economic fascism his presidential priority where Big Business, Big Government, and Big Finance have been formed to exploit the people with monopolized prices and a corrupted currency.

Fascism — a political philosophy, movement or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual, and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. (The state has power over every aspect of the economy to plan and regulate its workings. The factors of production are owned privately, but controlled by the gov­erning authorities as to what and how they are to produce, and what level of profits they are to retain.)

Capitalism — an economic system characterized by private or corpor­ate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by pri­vate decision rather than by state control, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market. (The state is neither to own nor operate the factors of production, nor to interfere in the peaceful decisions of their operation, leaving them to be controlled by the natural laws such as supply and demand that operate within the marketplace.)

Obviously the two systems are different in the fact that fascism advocates STATE control over the factors of production and their profits, while capitalism advocates PRIVATE control over those factors.

The primary distinction between the two systems is that capitalism is a system of economic organization without government involvement, thus its descriptive adjective of “laissez-faire,” which means to leave alone. The government’s job is basically to preserve the peace and perform those few limited functions granted by the Constitution.

Under fascism, the government’s job is to intervene into the marketplace to control all the various economic interactions of its participants. Its role is to manipulate the economic interactions through regulations and the conveyance of special privileges. Government assumes this power because it is felt that this is the only way stability and order can be maintained in society.

Under capitalism, the term “private” means free of government control or involvement. Thus, PRIVATE enterprise is FREE enterprise. Private businesses are entities in which the individual owners (rather than public officials) make the decisions of hiring, pricing, wage determination, production levels, policy planning, profit disposal, etc. Government is divorced from these economic decisions.

Under fascism, ownership of businesses are left in “private” hands, but the government rigidly regulates all businesses confiscating much of their profits and using them as the government sees fit. Thus business entities are private in name only. The term “private” is still used, but it no longer means free of government involvement. It is used within the context of government-business “cooperation.” However, such terminology is a fraud because there is never any cooperation when government is involved. Government simply tells businesses what it wants done and legally mandates that it be done. There is no choice in the matter. Those who don’t do as the government says are imprisoned or fined egregiously.

Fascism is thus a command economy where massive centralized government is developed to regulate its citizens’ lives. The major power centers of society — government, corporations, and banks — form a triad to monopolize and manipulate the economy according to their liking, their aggrandizement, and their profit at the expense of the individual and his rights.

“The essence of fascism,” writes Thomas J. DiLorenzo of Loyola College, “is that government should be the master, not the servant, of the people. Think about this. Does anyone in America really believe that this is not what we have now?

Look at the evidence. Since Obama became the de Facto president of the United States he has appointed czars to oversee new and complete State control over the American people. This appointing of czars is strictly prohibited by the Supreme Law of the United States of America - the US Constitution. These illegal actions by Obama are grounds for impeachment.

U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 2:

“.but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper,”

President Obama is appointing officials to his Executive Branch without conferring with the Senate. Here are some notables of his appointments as Czars:

Energy Czar: Carol M. Browner
Car Czar: Ed Montgomery
Health Care Czar: Nancy-Ann DeParle
Border Czar: Alan Bersin (Former US attorney).
Science Czar: John Holdren.
Green jobs Czar: Van Jones. - Admits being radicalized in jail. He has referred to himself as a communist and black nationalist. He said after the Rodney King riots he was a communist.

“It has taken President Barack Obama less than eight months to do what imperial Russia could not do in 400 years.”

Obama has appointed 31 “czars.” That’s more than ruled Russia during its entire imperial history. Originally, the title Czar (derived from Caesar) meant Emperor in the European medieval sense of the term, that is, a ruler who claims the same rank as a Roman emperor, with the approval of another emperor or a supreme ecclesiastical official. That would suggest that Obama claims to be the Emperor of the United States of America. The US Constitution strictly forbids Obama’s action - “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.” In the feudal system (in Europe and elsewhere), the nobility were generally those who held a fief, often land or office, under vassalage, i.e., in exchange for allegiance and various, mainly military, services to the Monarch.

Obama accepts a massive 18 karat gold chain necklace, from Saudi Arabia King Abdullah. The gold necklace is called the King Abdul Aziz Order of Merit, Saudi Arabia’s highest honor. “Those are only given to the very few friends of the king, and you are certainly one of those,” Abdullah said as he presented the thick chain and large medallion to Obama in an ornate meeting room with marble columns, engraved mirrors and a large chandelier. By accepting the highest honor bestowed by the King of Saudi Arabia, Obama has accepted the title of nobility in exchange for allegiances and various, mainly military, services to the Saudi Monarch. Obama illegally accepted a nobility title from the country that attacked the United States on September 11, 2001. The country that provided the majority if hijackers that carried out the attack against the US. The country of birth for bin Laden - the officially stated target for the United States unprovoked war of aggression against the sovereign foreign state of Afghanistan and its people.

In 1787 Doctor Benjamin Franklin was asked on the last day of the Constitutional Convention, while exiting the building: “Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”

Dr. Franklin answered: “A Republic, if you can keep it.”

If there was a way to wipe out terrorism would you take action and wipe it out? There is a way to wipe out terrorism. You attack the source. You wipe out the organization that is solely responsible for every terrorist act committed since it’s creation. You wipe out the CIA.

The CIA is not a police force nor a peacekeeping organization. It is not an aid agency nor a relief agency. It is an organization of murderers, , mercenaries, kidnappers, saboteurs, bombers, torturers and assassins. They have one objective - terrorism - violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants (civilians). Today they carry out terrorist acts against the US and foreign states. Their newest illegal covert terrorist operation is code named Al Qaeda. Every named Al Qaeda terrorist can be traced back to being recruited by and trained by the CIA including Usma bin Laden. bin Laden was recruited by the CIA to fight the Soviet army during the Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan.

The mujahideen were financed, armed and trained by the United States CIA during the administrations of Carter and Reagan, and also by Saudi Arabia, Pakistan under Zia-ul-Haq, Iran, the People’s Republic of China and several Western European countries. Pakistan’s secret service, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), was used as an intermediary for most of these activities to disguise the sources of support for the resistance. One of the CIA’s longest and most expensive covert operations was the supplying of billions of dollars in arms to the Afghan mujahideen militants. The arms included Stinger missiles, shoulder-fired, antiaircraft weapons that they used against Soviet helicopters and later against commercial airliners. Osama bin Laden was among the recipients of U.S. arms. Between $3–$20 billion in U.S. funds were funneled into the country to train and equip the mujahideen with weapons, including Stinger surface-to-air missiles.

US financing of the mujahideen Islamic insurgency actually started before the Soviets invaded. The CIA was very active in the region with orders from Carter to “suck” the Soviets into Afghanistan. U.S. policy, unbeknownst even to the Mujahideen, was part of a larger strategy “to induce a Soviet military intervention.” National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski stated:

“According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise. That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Soviets into the Afghan trap…. The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter “We now have the opportunity of giving to the Soviet Union its Vietnam War.”

Under Reagan, U.S. support for the mujahideen evolved into an official U.S. foreign policy, known as the Reagan Doctrine, which included U.S. support for anti-Soviet movements in Afghanistan, Angola, Nicaragua, and elsewhere. Ronald Reagan praised mujahideen as “freedom fighters”.

Even after the mujahideen successfully drove the Soviets out of Afghanistan the CIA stayed in the region. It had more terrorist operations with new terrorist recruits to work on for the US government. During the Clinton administration the CIA provided propaganda for an upcoming terrorist operation against the United States of America. It created terrorist training camps in the mountains that border Pakistan and Afghanistan. The CIA made Saudi Arabian billionaire nationalist USAMA BIN LADEN leader of their Al Qaeda training camps and had him make regular appearances at these camps in order to recruit Pakistani, Afghan, Saudi, Egyptian and United Arab Emirate nationals. To make the fake Al Qaeda threat to the US look real then US president Bill Clinton ordered air strikes on these CIA terrorist training camps. No air strike ever took place, only propaganda reports issued by the CIA that they did. Then on the morning of 14 July 1999, the US government - Bill Clinton, ordered the CIA to assassinate Abdul Ahad Karzai, father of future puppet president of the future US occupied Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai, in order for the US to create a new false enemy of the US - the Taliban, and gain a needed ally.

Years before his father was assassinated by the CIA, Hamid Karzai worked for the CIA in helping to provide financial and military support for the Mujahideen during the 1980s Soviet war in Afghanistan. While Karzai’s brothers emigrated to the United States, Hamid Karzai remained in exile in Pakistan throughout the Soviet occupation. He accompanied the first Mujahideen leaders into Kabul in 1992 following the Soviet withdrawal. When the Taliban emerged in the mid 1990s, Karzai, like many other Afghans, supported them, because he saw them as a force that could finally end the violence and corruption in his country. However, he later broke with them and refused to serve as their ambassador to the United Nations, telling friends he felt the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) was wrongly using them. Karzai stated that “there were many wonderful people in the Taliban.” After the US accused the Taliban of their assassination of Karzai’s father Hamid Karzai worked closely with the CIA and the US to help gather Afghan drug warlord support for the anti-Taliban movement.

As the U.S. military was preparing for a confrontation with the Taliban in September 2001, Karzai began lobbying NATO nations to purge his country of Al-Qaeda. “These Arabs, together with their foreign supporters and the Taliban, destroyed miles and miles of homes and orchards and vineyards,” he told BBC, “They have killed Afghans. They have trained their guns on Afghan lives… We want them out.” What he was actually doing is doing what he was told and air the CIA propaganda called Al-Qaeda. These Arabs he is refering to is the CIA Saudi operatives that were commanded by the now infamous bin Laden. These Arabs are part of the US, Pakistani and Saudi Arabian financed and trained terrorist cell code named Al Qaeda. The US needed to link the Taliban with their CIA terrorist cell code named Al Qaeda. The Taliban were now the new enemy of the US, for one reason only - the Trans-Afghan pipeline - a proposed natural gas pipeline from Turkmenistan across Afghanistan to Pakistan that US oil companies wanted to build and control.

The Trans-Afghan pipeline was suppose to be the financial future of the Afghan people and the Taliban was negotiating with several countries, including the US, to build this natural gas pipeline through Afghanistan. The US oil giant Unocal wanted the contract to build the pipeline. Unocal Vice President John J. Maresca—later to become a Special Ambassador to Afghanistan— testified before the House of Representatives that until a single, unified, friendly government is in place in Afghanistan, the trans-Afghan pipeline will not be built. Unocal petitioned the US government on February 12, 1998.

Immediately after this U.S. INTERESTS IN THE CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ASIA AND THE PACIFIC, the Clinton administration made the Taliban the enemy of the US and the Afghan people and began planning for the false flag attacks against the US of September 11, 2001. Bill Clinton ordered the CIA to prepare to attack the US and blame it on the CIA recruited, financed and trained terrorists under the command of one Usama bin Laden. The US needed an excuse to go after the Taliban and remove them so that US oil companies could take control of the Afghan people’s financial future - the Trans-Afghan pipeline. On August 7, 1998 the CIA was ordered by Bill Clinton to Bomb US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing over 200. Immediately the US government of Bill Clinton blamed the attacks on al-Qaeda (the US own CIA terrorist cell). Bill Clinton ordered the bombings to coincide with the eighth anniversary of the arrival of US troops in Saudi Arabia in order to suggest an anti-US sentiment.

On August 20, 1998 the US claimed to have fired 66 missiles at six al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan and 13 missiles at a pharmaceutical factory in Khartoum, Sudan, in retaliation for the US embassy bombings. Back in the US President Clinton is widely accused of using the alleged missile strike to distract the US public from a personal sex scandal.

December 5, 1998: Unocal announces it is withdrawing from the CentGas pipeline consortium Reason given - President Clinton refuses to extend diplomatic recognition to the Taliban, making business there legally problematic.

The following year a top level US policy document explicitly confirms the US military’s readiness to fight a war for oil. The report, Strategic Assessment 1999, prepared for the US Joint Chiefs of Staff and the secretary of defense, states, “energy and resource issues will continue to shape international security,” and if an oil “problem” arises, “US forces might be used to ensure adequate supplies.” Oil conflicts over production facilities and transport routes, particularly in the Persian Gulf and Caspian regions, are specifically envisaged.

June 1999: Enron announces an agreement to build a $140 million power plant in the Gaza Strip, between Israel and Egypt. One of the major financiers for the project is the Saudi Binladin Group, a company owned by bin Laden’s family. This is the second attempted project between these two companies. Ninety percent complete, the construction will be halted because of Palestinian-Israeli violence and then Enron’s bankruptcy.

July-August 1999: About a dozen Afghan leaders visit the US. They are militia commanders, mostly Taliban, and some with ties to the CIA and their al-Qaeda training camps. A few are opponents of the Taliban. Their exact names and titles remain classified.

July 4, 1999: With the chances of a US pipeline deal with the Taliban looking increasingly unlikely, President Clinton finally issues an executive order prohibiting commercial transactions with the Taliban. The order also freezes the Taliban’s US assets. Clinton falsely accuses the Taliban of harboring bin Laden. Rapist Bill Clinton shows the World that the US is a sore loser.

October 12, 2000: USS Cole Bombed by the CIA and blamed on fictitious leader of the CIA own Al Qaeda terrorist cell. Seventeen US soldiers are killed and 30 are wounded. The CIA will later conclude that with just slightly better training, their attack would have killed 300 and sunk the ship.

December 19, 2000: US Seeks Taliban Overthrow; Considers Russia-US Invasion of Afghanistan - The Washington Post reports, “The United States has quietly begun to align itself with those in the Russian government calling for military action against Afghanistan and has toyed with the idea of a new raid to wipe out Osama bin Laden. Until it backed off under local pressure, it went so far as to explore whether a Central Asian country would permit the use of its territory for such a purpose.” Russia and the US are discussing “what kind of government should replace the Taliban. Thus, while claiming to oppose a military solution to the Afghan problem, the United States is now talking about the overthrow of a regime that controls nearly the entire country, in the hope it can be replaced with a hypothetical government that does not exist even on paper.”

January 21, 2001: George W. Bush is inaugurated as the 43rd US President, replacing Bill Clinton. Numerous figures in Bush’s administration have been directly employed in the oil industry, including Bush, Vice President Cheney, and National Security Adviser Rice. Rice had been on Chevron’s Board of Directors since 1991, and even had a Chevron oil tanker named after her. It is later revealed that Cheney is still being paid up to $1 million a year in “deferred payments” from Halliburton, the oil company he headed. Enron’s ties also reach deep into the administration.

March 1, 2001: CIA blows up two giant stone Buddhas of Bamiyan—ancient statues carved into an Afghan mountainside, which are considered priceless treasures. The CIA objective was to get the international community to no longer recoginze the Taliban as the government of Afghanistan. The Taliban receive great international condemnation in response to the CIA destruction of the Giant Buddha Statues.

August 2-3, 2001: A senior official in the Taliban’s defense ministry tells journalist Hamid Mir that the US will soon invade Afghanistan. Mir will later recall that he is told, “[W]e believe Americans are going to invade Afghanistan and they will do this before October 15, 2001, and justification for this would be either one of two options: Taliban got control of Afghanistan or a big major attack against American interests either inside America or elsewhere in the world.” Mir reports this information before 9/11, presumably in the newspaper in Pakistan that he works for. [Bergen, 2006, pp. 287] Interestingly, Afghan warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar made a similar prediction to Mir several months before (see April 2001). Also, several weeks earlier, US officials reportedly passed word to Taliban officials in a back channel meeting that the US may soon attack Afghanistan if the Taliban do not cooperate on building an oil and gas pipeline running through the country. According to one participant in the meeting, the US attack would take place “by the middle of October at the latest”

September 11, 2001: The CIA attacks New York City and Washington DC killing 3,000. Using CIA owned aircraft, painted to look like US commercial jets, the CIA flies remotely controlled unmanned aircrafts into the Towers of the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon. This is not the first time the CIA attacked the World Trade Centers. The 1993 World Trade Center bombing occurred on February 26, 1993, when a car bomb was detonated below the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City. The 1,500 lb (680 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device was intended to knock the North Tower (Tower One) into the South Tower (Tower Two), bringing both towers down and killing thousands of people. The accused attackers spent time at the CIA Al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan. Both World Trade Center attacks were ordered by the US government to steal the $billions in gold and silver bullion that were vaulted in the basements of the 2 Towers. As much as $160 Billion in bullion was stored under the Trade Center. The gold was owned by many foreign nations, central banks and official international organizations. Were Clinton failed George W Bush succeeded.

For the September 11, 2001 attacks the CIA used a modified version of a 1962 false flag attack against the United States called Operation Northwoods. The modified version that the CIA used on 9/11 blamed Al Qaeda instead of the original target - communist Cuba.

Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false-flag plan that originated within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of the Operation Northwoods plan was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.”

Operation Northwoods included proposals for hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. The plan stated:

“The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.”

Several other proposals were included within the Operation Northwoods plan, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. The U.S. government’s Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted and the proposals included in the plan were never executed - that is until September 11, 2001.

February 14, 2002: The Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv notes: “If one looks at the map of the big American bases created in the Afghan war, one is struck by the fact that they are completely identical to the route of the projected oil pipeline to the Indian Ocean.”

If every country focused on wiping out the CIA, Al Qaeda would also be wiped out. To this day the CIA recruits foreign nationals and trains them to carry out terrorists acts - code named Al Qaeda. If every country acted to wipe out the CIA the World could be free of this terrorist menace.

The United States weather modification weapon has been activated since October 26, 2010. It has been beaming millions of watts of electricity into the atmosphere on a daily bases since then and this is altering both the electromagnetic field of the Earth as well as manipulating the Earth’s atmospheric conditions resulting in volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, hurricane force winds and heavy rain storms.

HAARP is a US Air Force controlled military weapon that they built to own the weather. They have one land based HAARP installation in Alaska and as well as a floating platform that is moved around in total secrecy throughout both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans.

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 was a report written for the United States Air Force. The report examines the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future.

The report states that “In 2025, US aerospace forces can “own the weather” by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.

Prior to the attack, which is coordinated with forecasted weather conditions, the UAVs begin cloud generation and seeding operations. UAVs disperse a cirrus shield to deny enemy visual and infrared (IR) surveillance. Simultaneously, microwave heaters create localized scintillation to disrupt active sensing via synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems such as the commercially available Canadian search and rescue satellite-aided tracking (SARSAT) that will be widely available in 2025. Other cloud seeding operations cause a developing thunderstorm to intensify over the target, severely limiting the enemy’s capability to defend. The WFSE monitors the entire operation in real-time and notes the successful completion of another very important but routine weather-modification mission. “

Owning the Weather in 2010

The United States Air Force has the technology to modify the weather anywhere in the World. It has it today, 15 years ahead of the report’s prediction. Their weather modification weapon is called HAARP. It has been used by the United States government against China (caused massive flooding), Russia (caused the heat wave that sparked huge fires and destroyed their crops), Pakistan (caused the massive flooding) and this past week in Asia (caused and continues to cause volcanic eruptions). Read for yourself what the United States Air Force is capable of doing by going to this link http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2025/v3c15/v3c15-1.htm. Table 1 - Operational Capabilities Matrix explains in detail what they have done to China, Russia, Pakistan, Asia and even North America.

HAARP’s own website tells us every time they activate their weather modification weapon. You can view this by going to their website and look at their Spectrum Monitor Waterfall Charts. The link to these charts are http://maestro.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/spectrum/getchart.cgi. The yellow and orange colors are the massive energy spikes of the activated HAARP.

HAARP has been used exclusively since Barack Obama became president of the United States. George W Bush used the United States military to attack and cause destruction in foreign states. His atrocities against mankind were all out in the open. Obama’s atrocities against mankind are secretive and cowardly. In less than 2 years Obama has caused more damage and destruction against foreign states than all of the presidents before him. He is more dangerous than Adolf Hitler. He attacks civilians and civilian populations. He murders innocent women and children. Obama is committing crimes against humanity with HAARP.

Weather modification treaties and laws

Weather control is the act of manipulating or altering certain aspects of the environment to produce desirable changes in weather. Weather control can have the goal of preventing damaging weather, such as hurricanes or tornadoes, from occurring; of causing beneficial weather, such as rainfall in an area experiencing drought; or of provoking damaging weather against an enemy or rival, as a tactic of military or economic warfare. Weather modification in warfare has been banned by the United Nations.

In 1975, the US and Canada entered into an agreement under the auspices of the United Nations for the exchange of information on weather modification activity.

Weather control, particularly hostile weather warfare, was addressed by the “United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72, TIAS 9614 Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques”. The Convention was: Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977; Entered into force October 5, 1978; Ratification by U.S. President December 13, 1979; U.S. ratification deposited at New York January 17, 1980.

When patients are presented with chest pain or other high-risk symptoms of heart and respiratory problems, doctors increasingly rely on nuclear imaging and computed tomography (CT) tests to find out whether there is evidence of heart disease, blockages in the coronary arteries, reduced blood flow to the heart as well as to detect cancer. Results of these medical procedures claim to help guide life-saving prevention and treatment options. Those so-called life-saving prevention and treatment options can actually do more harm than good. Over 90% of the patients who took the advise of the medical community are now dead. I guess you could call death the cure to your excruciating pain and suffering caused by computer tomography tests and radiation treatment options.

Today in the news it was reported that “A special type of CT scan appears to be able to detect lung cancer early enough to save some lives, U.S. researchers announced Thursday — offering what could be the first screening test for the devastating disease.” The following report will demonstrate the absurdness of that statement by the the National Cancer Institute in the U.S.

We begin with research by K. Faulkner, B.Sc., A.R.C.S., M.Sc. and B. M. Moores, B.Sc., Ph.D. of the Regional Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Christie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute, Manchester. A programme has been set up to monitor the exposure of personnel during specific diagnostic procedures. This programme includes the investigation of radiation hazard associated with the operation of computed tomography (CT) scanners.

Scattered radiation distributions around CT computed tomography scanners and the associated radiation hazard to personnel

The first-generation CT scanners employed a rotatetranslate geometry where both the detectors and the X-ray tube moved around the patient. Since then, there have been many advances in the design of CT scanners, such as the introduction of a fan-beam geometry coupled with a multi-detector array. These design changes have had little effect on the number of photons employed in producing an image; any reduction in exposure time in later-generation units is balanced by an increase in beam size. However, the decrease in time of exposure and picture reconstruction has enabled the number of tomographic sections in any given period of time to be increased. This increase allows either a larger throughput of patients and/or more slices per patient. Consequently, the total magnitude of scattered radiation will increase.

People living in the plateaus of Colorado or New Mexico receive about 1.5 mSv more per year than those living near sea level. The added dose from cosmic rays during a coast-to-coast round trip flight in a commercial airplane is about 0.03 mSv. Altitude plays a big role, but the largest source of background radiation comes from radon gas in our homes (about 2 mSv per year). Like other sources of background radiation, exposure to radon varies widely from one part of the country to another. ~ K. Faulkner

Computed tomography scanners exposes you to very high radiation levels.

Compare the radiation exposure from one chest x-ray to the amount of radiation exposure one experiences from our natural surroundings in 1 days. In just one CT scan (lasts just a few minutes) you are exposed to radiation levels that are hundreds, even thousands of times higher than natural radiation exposure. You are exposed to a radiation exposure level of 10 mSv for a typical abdominal region CT scan that lasts just a few minutes compared to 3 mSv exposure to natural surrounding radiation (from the Sun which is radiation we, animal life and plants need to survive) for an entire year - 365 days. If you were subjected to an abdominal region CT scan once every day for 1 year your unnatural radiation exposure level would be 3650 mSv - compared to just 3 mSv natural exposure for the same time period of 1 year. Even with just 1 CT scan your are receiving a very high level of unnatural radiation - 10 mSv unnatural radiation exposure level for 1 minute for a CT scan is extremely higher than what you are exposed to by natural surrounding radiation levels of 0.000005708 mSv per 1 minute.

Despite the widespread use and efforts to reduce exposure to radiation, the cancer causing effects of these diagnostic tests continue.

“These tests are so widely applied now, the concern is that there is some potential of increased cancer risk associated with their use,” said Jagat Narula, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine, and editor-in-chief of JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. “The problem is that most estimates of radiation exposure stem from an extrapolation of studies on World War II Hiroshima survivors, and the radiation exposure from imaging tests may not necessarily be the same.”

As with anything in medicine, a careful analysis of the risks and benefits of radiation imaging is warranted. Experts agree these tests should only be used when the clinical benefit is expected to exceed the potential harm. That being said, for the medical community to advise the population to get a CT scan on a regular bases in order to lower their chances of being inflicted with cancer is contradictory to medical research findings. It is the CT scanning that triggers cancer cell formation in otherwise very healthy people.

Your body’s cells, that make up tissues and organs, are damaged and destroyed by exposure to unnatural radiation exposure like that of the CT scanners. If the operator of the CT scan sets the machine to a higher than natural exposure level (natural exposure is 3 mSv / 365 days = 0.008219178 mSv per day or 0.000005708 mSv per minute) it will destroy the normal function of healthy cells in your body.

This is gross malpractice by the medical community. They are actually creating cancer by exposing a healthy person with very dangerous levels of radiation in a matter of minutes. Would you take the advise of the medical community if they advised you, a healthy person, to be shot with a bullet at least once a year in order to detect a gunshot wound? Would you enter a room or area that you know is contaminated with radiation or toxin? Would you go to a ball game or travel to a city or town if you knew beforehand that a terrorist was going to detonate a radioactive bomb there? Of course you wouldn’t. But that is exactly what the medical community is asking you to do. They are advising healthy people, like yourself, to enter a room where they will expose you to very high levels of radiation. They are advising you to willingly and voluntarily be exposed to very harmful radiation.

The CT radiation actually triggers cancer in a healthy person. The very high levels of man made radiation (10 mSv of man made radiation exposure for an abdominal CT scan compared to 0.000005708 mSv natural radiation exposure is very dangerous levels) gives birth to cancer. It immediately damages and destroys healthy cells. Any amount of direct exposure to man made radiation will immediately destroy the natural function of the cells in your body. CT scans and all other forms of medical tests and treatments including Chemotherapy exposes you to very high levels of unnatural radiation. For cancer patients they are exposed to extremely high levels of radiation in a very short period of time. Cancer patients in North America are exposed to higher levels of radiation than a dirty bomb. A dirty bomb’s purpose is to contaminate a wide area with radioactive material causing radiation poisoning, sickness and eventually death. Cancer treatment today does exactly that. Radiation poisoning or radiation sickness is a form of damage to organ tissue (cells) caused by excessive exposure to ionizing radiation. The term refers to acute problems caused by a large dosage of radiation in a short period. That is exactly what radiation treatment uses (ionizing radiation) and exactly what cancer CT scans, chemotherapy and radiation treatment does. They all damage organ tissues by exposing people to large dosages of ionizing radiation. That is why there is an over 90% death rate for cancer patients receiving radiation treatment. The radiation cancer treatment is actually destroying more healthy cells. Repeated man made radiation exposure eventually causes your body’s immune system to fail and you die - not from the cancer but from the exposure to very high levels of unnatural radiation in a very short period of time. You died a slow and very painful death as a result of radiation poisoning from the CT scans, chemotherapy and radiation treatment.

The virus called Vaccinia contains within its genome several proteins that gives the virus resistance to your body’s natural immune defense system protein called interferons. Your body’s immune system is made up of special cells, proteins, tissues, and organs, that defends you against germs and microorganisms every day. The Vaccinia virus was used in the vaccine for smallpox but by using it to destroy one disease they created many other diseases.

Vaccines destroys the body’s natural immunization response to attacks by viruses and micro organisms by interfering with the body’s production and release of interferons. Interferons are proteins made and released by lymphocytes in response to the presence of pathogens as viruses, bacteria, parasites or tumor cells. They allow communication between cells to trigger the protective defenses of the immune system that eradicate pathogens or tumors. The Vaccinia virus was used in the vaccine for smallpox but it has since been scientifically proven to be what triggered the AIDS virus - AIDS (Acquired immune deficiency syndrome) was created by the World Health Organization under the Smallpox Eradication Program. The Vaccinia virus was intentionally used to cause an immune deficiency. It was genetically altered to be resistant to your body’s natural immune defense system protein called interferons. It was originally created to target a specific group of people - black people and the gay population. But because of interracial and bisexual sexual activity and resultant interracial off springs the virus has mutated and can now infect any and all races.

Interferons are named after their ability to “interfere” with viral replication within host cells. Interferons have other functions: they activate immune cells, such as natural killer cells and macrophages; they increase recognition of infection or tumor cells by up-regulating antigen presentation to T lymphocytes; and they increase the ability of uninfected host cells to resist new infection by virus. Certain host symptoms, such as aching muscles and fever, are related to your body’s production of interferons to fight the infection.

All interferons share several common effects; they are antiviral agents and can fight tumors.

As an infected cell dies from a cytolytic virus, viral particles are released that can infect nearby cells. However, the infected cell can warn neighboring cells of a viral presence by releasing interferon. The neighboring cells, in response to interferon, produce large amounts of an enzyme known as protein kinase R (PKR). This enzyme phosphorylates a protein known as eIF-2 in response to new viral infections; eIF-2 is a eukaryotic translation initiation factor that forms an inactive complex with another protein, called eIF2B, to reduce protein synthesis within the cell. Another cellular enzyme, RNAse L—also induced following PKR activation—destroys RNA within the cells to further reduce protein synthesis of both viral and host genes. Inhibited protein synthesis destroys both the virus and infected host cells. In addition, interferons induce production of hundreds of other proteins — known collectively as interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs)—that have roles in combating viruses. They also limit viral spread by increasing p53 activity, which kills virus-infected cells by promoting apoptosis. The effect of IFN on p53 is also linked to its protective role against certain cancers.

Another function of interferon is to upregulate major histocompatibility complex molecules, MHC I and MHC II, and increase immunoproteasome activity. Higher MHC I expression increases presentation of viral peptides to cytotoxic T cells, while the immunoproteasome processes viral peptides for loading onto the MHC I molecule, thereby increasing the recognition and killing of infected cells by T cells. Higher MHC II expression increases presentation of viral peptides to helper T cells; these cells release cytokines that signal to and co-ordinate the activity of other cells of the immune system. Interferons directly activate some other immune cells, such as macrophages and natural killer cells.

Production of interferons predominantly occurs in response to microbes, such as viruses and bacteria, and their products. Binding of molecules uniquely found in microbes—viral glycoproteins, viral RNA, bacterial endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide), bacterial flagella, CpG motifs–by pattern recognition receptors, such as membrane bound Toll like receptors or the cytoplasmic receptors RIG-I or MDA5, can trigger release of IFNs. Toll Like Receptor 3 (TLR3) is important for inducing interferon in response to the presence of double-stranded RNA viruses; the ligand for this receptor is double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). After binding dsRNA, this receptor activates the transcription factors IRF3 and NF-κB, which are important for initiating synthesis of many inflammatory proteins. Release of IFN from cells is also induced by mitogens. Other cytokines, such as interleukin 1, interleukin 2, interleukin-12, tumor necrosis factor and colony-stimulating factor, can also enhance interferon production.

Many viruses have been genetically altered or engineered in bio-weapons laboratories to resist interferon activity. They were intentionally engineered to circumvent the interferon response by blocking downstream signaling events that occur after the cytokine binds to its receptor, by preventing further interferon production, and by inhibiting the functions of proteins that are induced by interferons. Viruses that inhibit interferon signaling include; the AIDS virus, the Avian Flu Virus, Swine Flu (H1N1), the Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV), dengue type 2 virus (DEN-2) and viruses of the herpesvirus family, such as human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV or HHV8). Man made viral proteins that were intentionally created to affect interferon signaling include EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) and EBV nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA-2) from Epstein-Barr virus, the large T antigen of Polyomavirus, the E7 protein of Human papillomavirus (HPV), and the B18R protein of vaccinia virus (used by the World Health Organization in the smallpox vaccine to trigger AIDS).

Your body’s immune system protects you

The immune system is the body’s defense against infectious organisms and other invaders. Through a series of steps called the immune response, the immune system attacks organisms and substances that invade body systems and cause disease.

The immune system is made up of a network of cells, tissues, and organs that work together to protect the body. The cells involved are white blood cells, or leukocytes, which come in two basic types that combine to seek out and destroy disease-causing organisms or substances.

Leukocytes are produced or stored in many locations in the body, including the thymus, spleen, and bone marrow. For this reason, they’re called the lymphoid organs. There are also clumps of lymphoid tissue throughout the body, primarily as lymph nodes, that house the leukocytes.

The leukocytes circulate through the body between the organs and nodes via lymphatic vessels and blood vessels. In this way, the immune system works in a coordinated manner to monitor the body for germs or substances that might cause problems.

The two basic types of leukocytes are:

1. phagocytes, cells that chew up invading organisms
2. lymphocytes, cells that allow the body to remember and recognize previous invaders and help the body destroy them

A number of different cells are considered phagocytes. The most common type is the neutrophil, which primarily fights bacteria. If doctors are worried about a bacterial infection, they might order a blood test to see if a patient has an increased number of neutrophils triggered by the infection. Other types of phagocytes have their own jobs to make sure that the body responds appropriately to a specific type of invader.

The two kinds of lymphocytes are B lymphocytes and T lymphocytes. Lymphocytes start out in the bone marrow and either stay there and mature into B cells, or they leave for the thymus gland, where they mature into T cells. B lymphocytes and T lymphocytes have separate functions: B lymphocytes are like the body’s military intelligence system, seeking out their targets and sending defenses to lock onto them. T cells are like the soldiers, destroying the invaders that the intelligence system has identified.

Here’s how it works:

When antigens (foreign substances that invade the body) are detected, several types of cells work together to recognize them and respond. These cells trigger the B lymphocytes to produce antibodies, specialized proteins that lock onto specific antigens.

Once produced, these antibodies continue to exist in a person’s body, so that if the same antigen is presented to the immune system again, the antibodies are already there to do their job. So if someone gets sick with a certain disease, like chickenpox, that person typically doesn’t get sick from it again.

Although antibodies (produced naturally by your body’s immune system) can recognize an antigen and lock onto it, they are not capable of destroying it without help. That’s the job of the T cells, which are part of the system that destroys antigens that have been tagged by antibodies or cells that have been infected or somehow changed. T cells also are involved in helping signal other cells (like phagocytes) to do their jobs.

Your body’s naturally produced antibodies also neutralizes toxins (poisonous or damaging substances) produced by different organisms. Lastly, your body’s antibodies can activate a group of proteins called complement that are also part of the immune system. Complement assists in killing bacteria, viruses, or infected cells. All of these specialized cells and parts of the immune system offer the body protection against disease. This protection is called immunity. All vaccines are manufactured to be cause an immune deficiency by interfering with your body’s ability to naturally kill all viruses, bacteria, parasites and tumor cells. The virus or multiple viruses that are included in all vaccines have been genetically engineered in labs to be resistant to your body’s auto immune response resulting in healthy people (people with very strong immune system) getting sick. The addition of toxins like mercury and adjuvants to the vaccine are intentionally added to cause latent inflictions and diseases. Why?

Vaccines are very good for business but very bad for your health

The health care system is in the business of making money. They are not in the business of curing people. In order to stay in business they need to make money. In order to make money they need a sick population. The health care system and the pharmaceutical industry can only stay in business if there are sick people, so to keep their business going, and to keep the money coming in they genetically alter and engineer viruses and micro organisms that are resistant to your body’s natural defense system.

Since no one would willingly and knowingly inject a virus, microorganism, toxin or poison into their body they use terrorism to coerce the masses into voluntarily being infected and poisoned. No one was rushing to get the Swine flu (H1N1) vaccine in 2009 until after the World Health Organization, the CDC, the UN and the United States president terrorized the World population by fraudulently declaring that millions of people would die if the nations of the World didn’t vaccinate their people. Was the H1N1 virus a pandemic as declared by the WHO? Absolutely not. The seasonal flu virus killed more people than the Swine Flu (H1N1) virus. Car accidents killed more people in the US than the H1N1 virus. The United States wars of aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq killed millions of innocent Iraqi and Afghan people.

Every one who did get the H1N1 vaccine are now the fiscal property of the health care and pharmaceutical for profit industries. Off springs of the adults who were vaccinated will be born with immune deficiencies. Those children have been inflicted with disease from the day of their conception. Millions of innocent children will be born with immune deficiencies and the genetically engineered and altered viruses, microorganisms, pathogens, and parasites will make them all their prey. Even those still in the womb of their mother will be victims as their mother’s DNA has already been affected by the toxins and immune resistant viruses, organism, and parasites that were injected into her by a vaccine.

Every week around 10,000 people die of cancer. Government figures show the death rate for cancer deaths has not changed in the last 10 years. Chemo and radiation only save around 10% of the people treated. So this shows our doctors don’t have much to work with. Even with traditional treatments like Chemo and radiation more people die than are cured. That means as many as 90% of the people who have been diagnosed with having cancer will die. That statistic alone should be enough to warrant an immediate change in how cancer is treated. If there is only a 10% success rate then traditional treatment must be avoided and treatment with a much higher percentage of success must be used.

Many alternative cancer treatments exists today. Alternative treatments that are natural and thus safer than the traditional cancer treatments and more successful than the traditional treatments. One such treatment is available freely and has been used for centuries. That treatment is dandelion. The dandelion’s root has been used in China for certain kinds of cancers for centuries.

For many people, dandelions are simply a yard pest. However, dandelions are very rich in nutrients. The roots and leaves of the plant have been used as medicines for breast maladies, bloating, digestive disorders, aching joints, fevers, and skin disorders. The leaves of the plant are very rich in vitamins, including A, C, D, and B-complex. They also have high levels of minerals like iron, magnesium, zinc potassium, manganese, copper, choline, calcium, boron, and silicon. The most active ingredient in dandelions, eudesmanolide and germacranolide, are found only in dandelions.

The leaves of the plant are very nutrient-rich, and so they make good supplements for women who are pregnant or elderly women. Dandelion can also be used as a gentle diuretic and can decrease serum cholesterol in some people. The root can be an appetite stimulant and it can treat some digestive disorders. Today, many herbal doctors use dandelion to purify the liver and gallbladder of toxins. Research indicates that dandelions can treat pneumonia, bronchitis, and other respiratory disorders. Dandelion can improve general health, and is beneficial to the kidneys, pancreas, spleen, stomach, and other organs. Dandelion is also recommended for the treatment of tinnitus, tonsillitis, osteoporosis, abscesses, anemia, boils, mammary tumors, cirrhosis, water retention, hepatitis, jaundice, rheumatism, and warts. Dandelion may also be effective in eliminating or averting age spots. Some people also use toasted dandelion root as a healthier alternative to coffee.

Dandelion has been successful in treating prostate, colon, breast, liver and best of all lung cancer. In a recent clinical study a controlled group of people with lung cancer were administered dandelion root as a treatment for their lung cancer and all who participated in the study have been cured.

The medical professionals all know that the immune system controls the cancer cells in your body. As long as the immune system is healthy, you don’t usually have a cancer problem. When your immune system gets run down, it loses control of the cancer cells, and they start eating live cells and this is what they call cancer. Powder made from dandelion root has something in it that builds up the blood and the immune system.

When the immune system is built up so far, it gets back control of cancer cells, and they do an about face and start cleaning up the mess they’ve made. This is why you must have a fair appetite because your body must build itself up and be healthy if your immune system is going to be strong. This will not work for people that have lost their appetite or are on CHEMO. Doctors try to blast the cancer out of your body with Chemo or radiation. By doing so, it destroys your immune system and appetite. These are the most important things your body needs to beat cancer. Operations also knock the immune system haywire. This is why so many people that have operations for cancer find that a short time later it has spread somewhere else.

Many of the worst diseases that have plagued the world have been cured quite easily. Women use to dread the goiter more than cancer. A little iodine in the diet cured that. For hundred of years the most dreaded diseases was leprosy and lockjaw. A doctor found he could produce penicillin from moldy bread and could cure them and many more things. How long has moldy bread been around? I’m sure scientists will find many uses for the powder made from the root of the dandelions besides cancer. They have already found it builds up the blood so you heal much faster.

After taking dandelion root (the roots that you collected and prepared yourself) for three or four days, you will start to feel good, but nothing else. That is because your blood is building up. When you blood is happy, you’re happy. In most cases, the dandelion root treatment will rebuild your immune system in from three days to three weeks to the point it takes back control of cancer cells and thus the cancer stops spreading. You will feel a little better each week. You will feel a little less tired as each week goes by. After three weeks most of the cancer causing pain will be gone and when the pain starts to go away you know it’s working. If you have bone cancer in the spine, it will take three months to work. This is not an overnight cure. It took a while to get in this condition and it will take a while for your body to heal. The sooner you start, the quicker you will be over cancer. Young people heal faster than old people, but it will help at any age.

There are no side effects except when your body has had enough and it lets you know by getting heart burn. Then it’s time to back off some - reduce the amount you have been taking. Some people get stomach aches. That is their body trying to tell them that they need less. It also means your cancer is under control and you don’t need as much. You will also find you probably won’t catch a cold while you are taking it full strength.

The biggest enemy for dandelion root treatment is Chemo. The stronger the Chemo, the less chance the dandelion root power has to help you as Chemo tears your immune system and appetite down, two of the most important things you need to cure cancer. There is only a ten percent chance Chemo will cure you. With no chemo, your chances are 75 to 80% but you must take it every day. Don’t let your doctor give you that old threat if you turn him down that goes, “If you want to throw your life away, I can’t stop you”. Just remember that 90% of the people that took their advice and took chemo are in the cemetery. Don’t blame the doctor, he is doing his best with what he has to work with or you could ask for a written guarantee.

Dandelion is food, not a drug. In fact dandelion is one of those rare medicinal plants which is utilized by all its parts like stem, leaves, flowers, and even roots. Dandelion is also a blood purifier. Thus, it is effective for herbal treatment for anemia or blood related diseases. Dandelion is rich in natural calcium count; thus the herbal remedies by dandelion are prescribed for menorrhagia affected women to substantiate the blood loss due to excessive bleeding. If someone is facing the problem of low blood pressure and also suffer from anemia, herbal supplement of dandelion can help him/her immensely. Dandelion works efficiently as a natural energizer as well as it reduces the problem of acidity remarkably. This is one of the reasons herbal supplements of dandelion is often prescribed for those people who are on weight loss program; natural back up of dandelion helps to neutralize acidity in body and supply energy as well. Dandelion also helps in flushing harmful toxins from our body and helps to cleanse the entire health system. So if you are sick and tired of being sick and tired, the dandelion is the cure.

They thought democracy could take the form of mob rule that could be shaped on the spot by a demagogue - a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power - e.g. Barack Hussein Obama. Therefore they devised a written Constitution which could only be amended by a super majority, preserved competing sovereignties in the constituent states, gave the control of the upper house (Senate) to the states, and created an Electoral College to select the president. They set up a House of Representative to represent the people.

According to Intrade there is now a 70% chance the Democrats will lose the House to the Republicans in the upcoming elections. Odds of a Republican victory in the House of Representatives has surged over the last 18 months. Why? Voters are madder than ever at Congress, with the majority of the nation wanting a clean slate.

A growing number of Americans feel their country is broken. The people are upset and angry. There’s so much stress in America. It’s keeping their trust from being rebuilt.

Although conventional wisdom has long held that people dislike Congress but like their district representatives, campaigners and campaign-watchers alike say this is not the year to take anything for granted.

Richard Brigle, 57, a Vietnam War veteran and former Teamster, came from Paw Paw, Mich. He said health care needs to be reformed — but not according to President Barack Obama’s plan.

“My grandkids are going to be paying for this. It’s going to cost too much money that we don’t have,”

“I can’t figure out to save me what Mr. Obama and the Democrats are trying to accomplish, unless they want socialism,” 73-year-old Joseph Wright, a retired paper-mill worker, told The Wall Street Journal.

Terri Hall, 45, of Starke, Fla., said she felt compelled to become political for the first time because she was upset by government spending. “Our government has lost sight of the powers they were granted,” she said. She added that the deficit spending was out of control, and said she thought it was putting the country at risk.

Do you realize that the US economic crisis all began with the Democrats in full control of both the House and the Senate? It was the Democrats who bankrupted the nation with their money laundering of federal tax dollars to the crooked bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks. It was the Democrats who are responsible for the millions of job loses and mortgage foreclosures. It is the Democrats who are responsible for the millions of Americans who now rely solely on food stamps to survive. It was the Democrats who imposed a health care extortion scheme onto the people of the United States of America. They didn’t solve the health care system problem of price gouging by the corporate administrators of hospitals and the pharmaceutical industry. They forced everyone who couldn’t afford health care in the first place to pay for the health care of the filthy rich with money that is for the basic essentials - food and shelter. Anyone who doesn’t pay their share to the upper class will be imprisoned until they pay. The Democrats took away even more guaranteed rights and freedoms of the American people. It is the Democrats who allows Obama to unlawfully assassinate any American who apposes him and his Socialist agenda and to commit war crimes by attacking civilians in Pakistan and Afghanistan with CIA unmanned drones. Yes Mr Obama, CHANGE is coming and on November 2, 2010 the House and the Senate will turn colors - from blue to red.

Just prior to a major earthquake in China, Chile, Iran and Haiti both civilians and public officials witnessed strange colors in the sky above. The colors were similar to an Aurora effect. There is only one weapon system on Earth that can mimic an Aurora and it is visible when this weapon is activated for an attack. That system is called the High frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP). The name itself reveals the effect it has on the atmosphere when activated - Active Auroral. The system has been fully operational for several decades now. There is no further research going on for its development as a weather modification weapon.

What kind of damage would a HAARP activation cause? Just before the major Haiti earthquake that struck on January 12, 2010 HAARP was activated for just 2 hours. Less than 24 hours before the Haiti earthquake HAARP was turned on a few minutes past 1:00 AM and turned off a few minutes past 3:00 AM. 9 months later and the effects of HAARP are still seen in Haiti.

Top doctors have revealed that the combination of garlic, apple cider vinegar and honey is an all natural wonder remedy that can cure everything from cancer to arthritis. Studies from respected universities around the world have scientifically proven the miracle home remedy that costs just pennies a day to make, is a super safe and 100% natural way to fight just about any affliction. Experts have verified that this health-restoring trio of garlic, apple cider vinegar and honey can wipe out both common and uncommon ailments.

In a study of arthritis victims Dr. Angus Peters of University of Edinburgh’s Arthritis Research Institute found a daily dose of apple cider vinegar and honey reduced pains by 90%. A daily dose of garlic and apple cider vinegar has proved to be a powerful fat destroyer and weight reducer, according to Dr. Raymond Fish of London’s famous Obesity Research Center.

The prestigious British Medical journal, The Lancet, reported that cholesterol levels plunged on average from 237.4 to 221.4 after volunteers consumed 50 grams of garlic and four ounces of butter. The study proved the dangers associated with high fat foods can be neutralized by adding garlic to your diet.

A study of 261 adults patients by the German Association of General Practitioners that serum cholesterol and triglyceride level factors associated with the risk of heart disease are significantly reduced by regular use of garlic in the diet.

Studies at Houston’s MD Anderson Cancer Institute in Houston, the Pennsylvania State University and GCLA support earlier evidence that certain ingredients in garlic block agents of the cancer of breast, colon, esophagus and skin. The National Cancer Institute found in a study of 1,000 people that eating a lot of garlic is linked to a reduced risk of stomach cancer. Dr. Etik Block of the State University of New York at Albany has discovered garlic unleashes at least 100 sulphur-producing components, all of which are powerful medicines.

There appears to be little doubt that this astounding remedy of garlic, apple cider vinegar and honey can extend life by protecting the user from many proven killers.

Dr. Hen Lee Tsno writes in China’s respected Journal of Natural Medicines, patients given this miracle drink before breakfast showed a remarkable reduction in high blood pressure and cholesterol in less than a week.

Years of scientific investigation by experts around the world have proven beyond a doubt that garlic, apple cider vinegar and honey are nature’s magic potion. The three powerful ingredients are available everywhere and they cost only pennies a day.

Considering all that these natural substances can do for human health, it’s amazing they are not more widely used. Dr. Jack Soltanoff, a nutritional expert from New York praises the benefits of apple cider vinegar. He’s recorded remarkable success stories involving arthritis sufferers. “I have seen many arthritis patients start to loosen up at once“, says Dr. Soltanoff. Some even call it (apple cider vinegar) a natural arthritis tonic that frees them from stiffness, pain and throbbing aches.

Within just a few weeks, most pain wracked arthritis patients can perform normal activities because of this simple tonic. Boxing legend Mohammed Ali reportedly takes a daily dose of garlic, vinegar and honey to lighten the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease and many other athletes use it to gain competitive edge.

Unpasteurized honey has been described as the perfect food. It contains at least 31 nutrients, 13 minerals, the component part of nine vitamins, six acids and four key enzymes.

Patients, who took the additional apple cider vinegar and honey drink daily, were more vigorous, had fewer colds or infectious diseases and in general were healthier than those who didn’t. There’s no question that this astounding elixir can extend life by protecting you from many proved killers.

Honey not only makes your daily dose taste better. The sweet stuff also aids in your body’s ability to absorb the medical properties of the powerful ingredients. Garlic provides a storehouse of vitamins and minerals, but what excites researchers most is growing evidence that allicin, an enzyme present in large amount in garlic, stimulates the immune system. Allicin is effective against fatal infections such as tuberculosis, AIDS, MRSA infection, Bacterial infections, SARS, Cancer, Hepatitis and MRSA.

Your body will get much more benefit if you eat garlic that has been cut into slices as garlic crushing will destroy much of the active Allicin? Allicin produced by the minced garlic will be wasted if it is not consumed immediately.

The following simple remedy is great for healing many diseases and aches or pains with a simple daily 2 tsp. dose. It has been successfully used for healing or curing muscle or joint aches, Alzheimer’s disease, arthritis, asthma, high blood pressure, hemorrhoids, infertility and impotence, toothaches, fewer colds and infectious diseases, obesity ( it is a powerful fat destroyer and weight reducer), ulcers, reduces high blood pressure and cholesterol, reduced risks of breast, blocks agents of cancer of the breast - colon - esophagus - skin - stomach and stimulates the immune system.

Solution: Apple Cider vinegar, garlic, honey remedy

Here’s how to make your own miracle medicine…

Put the following in a blender…

1 cup apple cider vinegar
1 cup raw honey
8 cloves garlic

Mix on high speed for 60 seconds. Pour mixture into a glass container. Seal and leave in the refrigerator for five days. Normal dosage is two tsp. in a glass of water or fruit juice, grape or orange juice. It is best taken before breakfast.

The apple cider vinegar has to have what is called “the mother”–which means it is not filtered. Look for this on the label–available in health stores, and some grocery stores. Honey has to be unpasteurized. Garlic is best organic.

News of Bin Laden’s Death and Funeral 10 days ago

Islamabad - A prominent official in the Afghan Taleban movement announced yesterday the death of Osama bin Laden, the chief of al-Qa’da organization, stating that bin Laden suffered serious complications in the lungs and died a natural and quiet death. The official, who asked to remain anonymous, stated to The Observer of Pakistan that he had himself attended the funeral of bin Laden and saw his face prior to burial in Tora Bora 10 days ago. He mentioned that 30 of al-Qa’da fighters attended the burial as well as members of his family and some friends from the Taleban. In the farewell ceremony to his final rest guns were fired in the air. The official stated that it is difficult to pinpoint the burial location of bin Laden because according to the Wahhabi tradition no mark is left by the grave. He stressed that it is unlikely that the American forces would ever uncover any traces of bin Laden.

Former CIA officials have admitted to creating a fake video in which intelligence officers dressed up as Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda in an effort to defame the terrorist leader throughout the middle east and to help the president of the united States in difficult times and situations like low poll ratings and upcoming national votes.

The details are outlined in a Washington Post article by investigative reporter and former Army Intelligence case officer Jeff Stein. In the article the former CIA officials revealed that the agency did produce fake Bin Laden videos and audio tapes. The former officials told Stein that the project was taken over by the military after the agency didn’t have enough money and expertise to carry out the projects.

“The military took them over,” said one. “They had assets in psy-war down at Ft. Bragg,” at the army’s special warfare center. This revelation bolsters evidence that the intelligence agencies, and perhaps more significantly, the military have been engaged in creating fake Bin Laden videos in the past.

The military and the CIA would create the videos and audio tapes and have a company called Intelcenter, a U.S. monitoring group, routinely release Bin Laden videos and audios, much of which have been proven to be either rehashed old footage or outright fakes. Another US company, iDefense, a web security company that monitors intelligence from the middle east, was also named as a known participant in the distribution and airing of fake terrorist threat tapes.

iDefense is made up of long serving ex military intelligence officials, such as senior military psy-op intelligence officer Jim Melnick, who served 16 years in the US army and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) in psychological operations. Melnick has also worked directly for former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Intelcenter were the ones who released the “laughing hijackers” tape and claimed it was an Al-Qaeda video, despite the fact that the footage was obtained by a “security agency” at a 2000 Bin Laden speech.

IntelCenter was also caught adding its logo to a tape at the same time as Al-Qaeda’s so-called media arm As-Sahab added its logo - proving the two organizations were one and the same.

The revelation that the CIA project was taken over and drastically improved by the Pentagon at some point after 2003 jives with the improvement in quality of Bin Laden videos in later years. Compare the audio and video quality of 9/11 to the ones released today and you too can clearly see a major improvement. Most notably the video that was released immediately ahead of Bush’s 2004 election, and it’s digitally manipulated duplicate from 2007, in which Bin Laden appeared to have a dyed beard. Just because Bush is out and Obama is in doesn’t mean an end to the fake videos and audios. Obama knows he and the Democrats are going to lose the election next week and have used fake terrorist threats terrorize the United States people. The only difference this time is that Obama has exclusively used fake audio studio recordings. The American public are wiser now and they know a fake video of bin Laden when they see one. That, on top of the fact that a lot of countries have facial recognition software now and they would quickly discover an Obama faked video. Every airport around the World now has some kind of facial recognition software.

For all of those who just can’t face reality and still believe that bin Laden is alive, even though the largest and best equipped intelligence agencies in the World can’t find him, the proof of fake videos and audio tapes are being made is revealed by IntelCenter themselves. Intelcenter’s own website http://www.intelcenter.com/audio-video/index.html states: “One of IntelCenter’s core competencies is the collection, exploitation, analysis and dissemination of terrorist and rebel group video materials. The goal of our video program is to provide the highest quality video and audio materials in a professional format and timely manner to the analytical and operator communities in the counterterrorism arena. These video libraries are made available on DVD, CD-ROM, special formats designed to support technical exploitation and through Enterprise/Workgroup Streaming Network Solutions.”

“IntelCenter’s video production facility is directly integrated into its 24/7 Operations Center located in the Washington, DC metropolitan area.”

Their website clearly states their intent to exploit the content of their videos and audios. Their video production facility is conveniently located in Washington DC and is operational 24/7. This is to cater to and to accommodate the United States government, the president and his agendas and policies. It is no wonder that just before an election, where the president is falling behind in the polls or the threat of one party losing the House and or the Senate, a fake terrorist video or audio threat is so conveniently produced and released for immediate publication on all US news networks despite the fact that bin Laden has been dead since 2001. Anyone can now live for eternity thanks to the rewind button on your VCR, CD or DVD player.

The Geneva Convention states that “the human dignity of all individuals must be respected at all times. Everything possible must be done, without any kind of discrimination, to reduce the suffering of people who have been put out of action by sickness, wounds or captivity whether or not they have taken direct part in the conflict.

A POW (Prisoner of War) at the illegal US Guantanamo Bay prison camp in Cuba is the first child soldier to go on trial for war crimes since Nuremberg, after a US military judge ruled in favor of his civilian commanders that there were no legal obstacles preventing the camp’s special military commissions from prosecuting him. Despite what the United States claims, there is are many major legal obstacles in regards to prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay - the military camp itself is illegal under Article 49 of Fourth Geneva Convention. Every prisoner held at Guantanamo Bay, , including Omar Khadr, has been illegally deported out of an occupied territory under belligerent military occupation: “Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory (Afghanistan and Iraq) to the territory of the Occupying Power (the United States) or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.”

Omar Khadr, a Canadian national, was 15 at the time of his US alleged crimes. His defense team said his age should see him treated as a victim and rehabilitated, rather than prosecuted as a war criminal. The truth is Khadr should never have been put on trial for war crimes. The United States government is guilty of war crimes, not a person acting within his right to fight and kill in self-defense of an armed attack by the United States against a country which had nothing to do with the attacks on US soil on September 11, 2001.

A war of aggression is a military conflict waged without the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a war crime under the customary international law. During the Nuremberg trial, the chief American prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson, stated:

To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

The FBI list of hijackers include mostly Saudi hijackers, bin Laden is also a Saudi. bin Laden has very close personal ties to the Saudi royal family yet Saudi Arabia remains a very close ally of the United States. Saudi Arabia had the majority of hijackers and the alleged leader of the attacks on US soil on September 11, 2001 yet the United States chose to immediately pardon Saudi Arabia for its crimes against the United States on September 11, 2001 and with the aid of the attacking country launched 2 wars of aggression (both war crimes) against 2 countries that had nothing to do with 9/11. There were no Afghani or Iraqi hijackers. For this reason alone the United States had absolutely no legal grounds to launch a war against either Afghanistan or Iraq. The US did not act in self defense. The United States launched wars of terror and aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq. The people who are attacking and killing US soldiers are the ones who have the full support of the law as their actions are in self defense of an unprovoked armed attack by the United States. The people who have killed US soldiers are not war criminals or terrorists. They are the resistance, defending their country and countrymen from the criminal acts of wars of aggression by the United States. They are fighting for the freedom of the people who have wrongfully been attacked, tortured, and murdered by the United States.

The Canadian government has been largely indifferent to the plight of its young citizen, Omar Khadr, as he languishes for more than eight years in the illegal Guantanamo Bay. Content with assurances from the United States that Omar will receive “due process” from a special military commission, the government has failed to follow the example of every other Western nation and demand the repatriation of its citizen from the “legal black hole” that is Guantanamo Bay. Ottawa’s confidence in the Guantanamo Bay military commission process is increasingly inexplicable, especially as it becomes clear that the “process” is designed to do nothing other than produce criminal convictions based on tainted evidence.

Fifteen at the time of his initial detention, Omar was allegedly sent into combat as a child soldier by his father. It goes without saying that Omar was unable to control the circumstances of his birth or his family’s decision to move him from Canada to the Middle East as a child. Omar was shot and suffered near-deadly wounds in the course of a four-hour armed attack against him and others by the United States during which he allegedly threw a hand grenade that killed a U.S. solider. In any war a soldier is a legal target. Any soldier can be legally killed when they participate in any armed attack against any other person. The person or persons who gave the order to launch any armed attack is also a legal target - that includes the president of the United States.

War of aggression, torture and mass murder of civilians are all criminal acts

The Nuremberg tribunals were the first international courts established to try crimes against international law, and they firmly established the responsibility of individuals, at whatever level they participate in atrocities, as well as denying immunity to political leaders. Article 7 of the Charter expressly rejected sovereign immunity for military and political leaders: “The official position of defendants, whether as heads of state or responsible officials in government departments, shall not be considered as freeing them from responsibility or mitigating punishment.”

United States Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, the Nuremberg Prosecutor, opened his case with a proclamation that the privileges attaching in international law to the State should never again shield human beings from retribution for their own wickedness, at least before an international court:

[i]These defendants were men of a station and rank which does not soil its own hands with blood. They were men who knew how to use lesser folk as tools. We want to reach the planners and designers, the inciters and leaders…. The idea that a state, any more than a corporation, commits crimes, is a fiction. Crimes are always committed only by persons…. t is quite intolerable to let such a legalism become the basis of personal immunity…. Modern civilisation puts unlimited weapons of destruction in the hands of men. It cannot tolerate so vast an area of legal irresponsibility.

It was the judgment at Nuremberg which heralded the removal of the shield of state sovereignty for crimes against humanity:

It was submitted that … where the act in question is an act of state, those who carry it out are not personally responsible, but are protected by the doctrine of the sovereignty of the state. In the opinion of the tribunal (this contention) must be rejected…. Crimes against international law are committed by men, not by abstract entities, and only by punishing individuals who commit such crimes can the provisions of international law be enforced…. [T]he principle of international law, which under certain circumstances protects the representative of the state, cannot be applied to acts which are condemned as criminal by international law. The authors of these acts cannot shelter themselves behind their official position in order to be freed from punishment in appropriate proceedings.

Gross injustice by the real war criminals - the United States

Unlike other child soldiers, whom Canada and the international community view as victims deserving sympathy and rehabilitation, Omar Khadr was illegally deported from an occupied territory to the attacking United States and rigorously exploited as a potential source of intelligence about his father and family. Rather than receiving “assistance for his physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration” as required by international law, Omar instead faced indefinite detention and trial for “war crimes” based on nothing more than the allegation that he engaged in combat against opposing military forces during an armed conflict.

Omar has been put on trial in a system that is fundamentally flawed and unfair — so much so that the U.S. Supreme Court has struck down military commissions once already for failing to provide the most basic protections required for a fair trial under international law. Military commissions are designed to produce convictions based on unreliable evidence derived through “enhanced interrogation techniques” (i.e., torture and coercion). They do so using special rules that allow prosecutors to admit statements and confessions extracted from detainees at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere. If you have any doubt as to whether Omar will receive a “fair trial” from this process, look no further than the fact that only non-U.S. citizens can be tried by military commission.

The US trial of a person they attacked unlawfully is a mockery of all legal systems. A war of aggression is a military conflict waged without the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a war crime under the customary international law.

In 1950, the Nuremberg Tribunal defined Crimes against Peace, in Principle 6, specifically Principle VI(a), submitted to the United Nations General Assembly, as:

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

On December 14, 1974, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 3314, which defined the crime of aggression. This definition is not binding under international law, but it is often cited in opposition to military actions.

This definition makes a distinction between aggression (which “gives rise to international responsibility”) and war of aggression (which is “a crime against international peace”). Acts of aggression are defined as armed invasions or attacks, bombardments, blockades, armed violations of territory, permitting other states to use one’s own territory to perpetrate acts of aggression and the employment of armed irregulars or mercenaries to carry out acts of aggression. A war of aggression is a series of acts committed with a sustained intent. The definition’s distinction between an act of aggression and a war of aggression make it clear that not every act of aggression would constitute a crime against peace; only war of aggression does. States would nonetheless be held responsible for acts of aggression.

Both International law and domestic law allow lethal force to be used in self-defense against armed attacks. The US used its military in an unlawful armed attack against the sovereign country of Afghanistan. It’s legal to use lethal force in response to the US armed attacks. There’s no special protection given to soldiers or even heads of state that protects them from the otherwise lawful use of lethal force in self-defense. In any and all wars a soldier is a legal target. Any and all uniformed members of any military, US or otherwise, is a lawful target under the laws of armed conflict. Soldiers engaged in armed conflict are not afforded due-process rights. Even away from the battlefield, “deprivation of life shall not be regarded as a violation of the right to life when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary in … defense of any person from unlawful violence.”

In self-defense any person can use lethal and deadly force in defending themselves, others and their country from an unlawful war of aggression. A war of aggression, a war crime, was committed by the US against Afghanistan and Iraq. War crimes were not committed by Omar Khadr, they were committed and continue to be committed by US and NATO forces. Afghanistan did not attack the US or any NATO country. The US attacked Afghanistan. Omar Khadr had every legal right to not only kill one US soldier but as many as he could because Omar Khadr’s actions were purely in self-defense. He was wounded during an attack by armed US soldiers. In self-defense he had every legal right to use deadly force.

Legal Afghan Resistance and illegal US Unlawful Combatants

During conflict, punishment for violating the laws of war may consist of a specific, deliberate and limited violation of the laws of war in reprisal. Soldiers who break specific provisions of the laws of war lose the protections and status afforded as prisoners of war, but only after facing a “competent tribunal” (GC III Art 5). At that point they become an unlawful combatant but they must still be “treated with humanity and, in case of trial, shall not be deprived of the rights of fair and regular trial”, because they are still covered by GC IV Art 5. According to the laws of war soldiers become unlawful combatants when they break specific provisions of the laws of war. The US fraudulently declares the Afghan resistance which are fighting in self-defense from the US unlawful war of aggression as unlawful combatants. The Afghan Taliban and other resistance groups are not breaking any laws. The Afghan Taliban and other resistance groups are the only ones operating within the law as their fight is one of self-defense. The Taliban and other resistance groups are killing US, Canadian and NATO troops legally. They are the ones being unlawfully attacked by US, Canadian and NATO troops. They, the Taliban and the Afghan resistance, are defending their country and their fellow countrymen from the unlawful war of aggression, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity that are being committed on a daily basis by the US, Canada and NATO.

Self-defense is the act of defending oneself, one’s property or the well-being of another from physical harm. In the United States, the defense of self-defense allows a person attacked to use reasonable force in their own defense and the defense of others. A person may use physical force to prevent imminent physical injury, however a person may not use deadly physical force unless that person is in reasonable fear of serious physical injury or death.

Canadian Criminal Code, Sections 34-37

34. (1) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted without having provoked the assault is justified in repelling force by force if the force he uses is not intended to cause death or grievous bodily harm and is no more than is necessary to enable him to defend himself.

(2) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted and who causes death or grievous bodily harm in repelling the assault is justified if
(a) he causes it under reasonable apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence with which the assault was originally made or with which the assailant pursues his purposes; and
(b) he believes, on reasonable grounds, that he cannot otherwise preserve himself from death or grievous bodily harm.

The Hague and Geneva Conventions guide military rules of action for US forces. They are:

* Fight only enemy combatants.
* Do not harm enemies who surrender; disarm them and turn them over to the chain of command.
* Do not kill or torture detainees.
* Collect and care for the wounded, whether friend or foe.
* Do not attack medical personnel, facilities, or equipment.
* Destroy no more than the mission requires.
* Treat all civilians humanely.
* Do not steal; respect private property and possessions.
* Do one’s best to prevent violations of the law of war.
* Report all violations of the law of war to superiors.

The US, Canada and NATO are attacking the Afghan people and their legal Taliban governing body on a daily basis since October 7, 2001. The Afghan people and the Taliban are acting in legal self-defense of themselves and the defense of their country and fellow countrymen. The Afghan people and the Taliban are forced every day to use deadly physical force in defense from the unlawful life threatening daily attacks by US, Canadian and NATO forces. According to US, Canadian and International Law the US, Canadian and NATO leadership are guilty of War Crimes, Crimes against Peace, Crimes against Humanity, Murder and Torture.

The Third Geneva Convention (”Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War”) covers members of the armed forces who fall into enemy hands. They are in the power of the enemy State, not of the individuals or troops who have captured them.

Prisoners of war MUST be:

- Treated humanely with respect for their persons and their honour.
- Enabled to inform their next of kin and the Central Prisoners of War Agency (ICRC, the International Red Cross) of their capture.
- Allowed to correspond regularly with relatives and to receive relief parcels.
- Allowed to keep their clothes, feeding utensils and personal effects.
- Supplied with adequate food and clothing.
- Provided with quarters not inferior to those of their captor’s troops.
- Given the medical care their state of health demands.
- Paid for any work they do.
- Repatriated if certified seriously ill or wounded, (but they must not resume active military duties afterwards) .
- Quickly released and repatriated when hostilities cease.

If you or a member of your family was being attacked by someone who broke in and invaded your home, would you defend yourself or would you let the attacker cause you great harm or even kill you? Would you regard yourself as being a terrorist or a murderer if you fought off your attacker? The answer is clear. The law is clear. The law allows for the use of deadly force any time a faultless victim reasonably believes that unlawful force which will cause death or grievous bodily harm is about to be used on him.

All over the United States and Canada flu shot clinics have opened their doors for busine$$. The flu season is the time when the pharmaceutical companies make money. In order to continue to make money after the flu season is over they add toxic ingredients to the vaccines that will intentionally cause health issues, complications, illnesses and diseases. The campaign is now on to terrorize the population in order to coerce them into willingly being injected with a toxic and lethal flu shot. The symptoms they describe for the seasonal flu is mild compared to the severe adverse reactions healthy people will be suffer after being injected with a lab manufactured virus poison mixture they call the flu vaccine.

Last year the media stated that a vaccine is linked to lowering ones chances of being stricken with a heart attack. That statements was a blatant contradiction of all previously written medical research papers and reports that explicitly links vaccines to actually causing heart attacks and other very serious side effects including AIDS (smallpox vaccine was intentionally engineered to trigger AIDS), Alzheimer, Multiple Sclerosis, Autism (MD, David Ayoub, revealed the link between the vaccine ingredient mercury to Autism) Parkinson’s disease, and many other neurological damage.

One ingredient added to most all vaccines is potassium chloride. Potassium chloride is also commonly known as “Muriate of Potash” is not only just used in medicine it is used in scientific applications, and judicial execution through lethal injection. The majority of the potassium chloride produced is used for making fertilizer. Mild side effects can include gastrointestinal discomfort including nausea and vomiting, diarrhea and bleeding of the gut. Orally or injected it is very toxic in excess, high doses can cause cardiac arrest and rapid death.

Symptoms of a potassium chloride overdose may include paralysis, numbness or tingly feeling, uneven heartbeat, feeling light-headed, fainting, chest pain or heavy feeling, pain spreading to the arm or shoulder, nausea, sweating, seizure (convulsions), or coma.

Potassium chloride is a drug that has been used to induce Hyperkalemia. Hyperkalemia refers to the condition in which the concentration of the electrolyte potassium (K+) in the blood is elevated. Extreme hyperkalemia is a medical emergency due to the risk of potentially fatal abnormal heart rhythms (arrhythmia). The potassium chloride used in vaccines induces Hyperkalemia which is intentionally brought about in an execution by lethal injection, with potassium chloride being the third and last of the three drugs administered in the United States of America to cause death. Potassium chloride is also one of the CIA’s choices of poisons to assassinate people by inducing a heart attack.

Liu Dawei, a vaccination expert with the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, China) said that people in China have suffered severe side effects including anaphylactic shocks (sudden drop in blood pressure or difficulty in breathing) after taking the H1N1 Flu jab - contains the live virus and adjuvants like potassium chloride. An adjuvant is a pharmacological (man made) agent intentionally added to a drug to increase or aid its effect (including its side-effect of making healthy people very sick).

Time Magazine revealed that among the 12 million people vaccinated in China, 1,235 have suffered side effects, ranging from rashes, sore arms, headaches to severe anaphylactic shocks. A Hunan teacher - was playing basketball some 7 to 8 hours after the H1N1 Swine influenza shot. His sudden death (cardiac arrest) caused the immediate withdrawal of the vaccine batch from where he got his H1N1 flu shot.

The WHO have always warned that influenza vaccines may have negative side effects. They have publicly stated that “No vaccine is risk-free”. The United States knew the risk associated with vaccines and for this reason the Obama administration exempted the entire medical industry from litigation for wrongful death from the A-H1N1 vaccine. The European Union states were very alarmed at the United States taking this step to shield the drug companies from liability for creating vaccines that are more toxic and harmful than the actual influenza virus. Poland went even as far as to refuse to vaccinate it’s population for the A-H1N1 influenza virus. Many other countries have subjected US made vaccines to biological testing and have all determined that the vaccines are both toxic and deadly. They have determined that vaccines cause very serious side effects because of what is in the vaccines. The adjuvants and chemical compounds are the same as those used to make biological weapons and to exterminate mice and other house pests. Their research has proven a link between vaccines and heart attacks, cancer, Autism, AIDS, ALS, ADD, MS, Gulf War Syndrome and many other very serious and deadly illnesses and diseases.

“You can’t convince them this is right. Do you know why? Because they already know it. They told me they know it. They cannot admit it because of civil and criminal, potential problems. You can’t convince someone who already knows it.” ~ Mark Geier, M.D. - Chicago, Illinois May 30th, 2004 at the Autism One Conference.

So why is the entire Canadian and US media claiming that vaccines are linked to lowering heart attacks when in fact they are linked to causing cardiac arrest and other severe illnesses and disease that ultimately result in death? Why haven’t vaccines been banned? Why do doctors willfully violate their Hippocratic oath by injecting this toxic and lethal poison into healthy human beings? For centuries, physicians recited the Hippocratic oath at convocation ceremonies and upon entering medical practice. The Hippocratic Oath was an oath taken by physicians to protect all life, to hold in highest regard one’s teachers, to recognize one’s limitations, and to renounce self-interest in the treatment of patients. Part of the oath states:

“The practice of medicine is a privilege which carries important responsibilities. All doctors should observe the core values of the profession which centre on the duty to help sick people and to avoid harm. I promise that my medical knowledge will be used to benefit people’s health. ”

“I will not provide treatments which are pointless or harmful or which an informed and competent patient refuses. ”

Vaccines have repeatedly been reported by both the scientific and medical community as having harmful side effects, even deadly side effects. Every time a healthy person is given a vaccine, any vaccine, they immediately become ill. That fact alone is proof that doctors are violating their ethical oath - “I will not provide treatments which are pointless or harmful”. The evidence speaks loudly and clearly that vaccines cause more harm than good. They are the root cause of most illnesses and diseases that inflicts mankind today. They infect healthy people with viruses and microorganisms that cause illnesses and diseases. They kill more people than the actual flu virus. Vaccines are lethal injections.

Healthy people don’t get sick. Healthy people have a strong immune system which can easily destroy all known viruses - including the man made H1N1 virus, AIDS virus and Avian flu virus. Healthy people only get sick after they are injected with the virus or microorganism through vaccines. Why then are healthy people still being told to get the flu vaccine? Why then are vaccines still being administered by doctors who are bound by oath to “do no harm”? Because the health care system is no longer about preventing illnesses and diseases or curing people, they are in it for the money. You and I are no longer regarded as people, we are commodities - a financial asset. As healthy people we are of no value so they infect us with viruses, microorganism, toxins and poisons to make us sick. The pharmaceutical companies make their $billions only during the seasonal flu season. So now is the time to scare people and thereby coerce people to get infected with their very harmful and toxic influenza vaccines and influenza drugs.

The flu season is to start soon because the days are getting shorter and colder and more people are starting their yearly hibernation. It is this hibernation that causes influenza. The lack of sunlight causes a drastic drop in the amount of Vitamin D that your body makes naturally with exposure to the sun’s UVB rays. Lack of sunlight and its Vitamin D is what triggers influenza and disease.

The best prevention against influenza is to get at least 20 minutes a day of sunlight exposure - outdoors. Simply sitting in front of a window in your house doesn’t trigger your body to start to produce Vitamin D naturally. The glass of the windows blocks the life giving and influenza killing sun’s UVB rays. You will cure yourself of any influenza virus that is man made or naturally occurring with just a 20 minutes of outdoor sun exposure. Don’t wear sunglasses either as the lens of the sunglasses blocks the UVB rays from entering your body through your eyes.

All influenza viruses are easily killed by exposure to UVB rays. Supplements can’t even match the amount of Vitamin D that is created naturally from exposure to sunlight for 20 minutes. Milk contains only 100 IU per one glass of synthetic Vitamin D, added by the FDA, whereas sunlight produces from 10,000–25,000 IU of vitamin D in our skin in just 20 minutes.

It is better to prevent any disease than treat it. The pharmaceutical companies have the reverse philosophy because $billions in profits are at stake if people simply stopped getting vaccinated and started living outdoors in the life giving and healing sunlight.

The chemtrail conspiracy theory holds that some contrails are actually chemicals or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for a purpose undisclosed to the general public. Versions of the chemtrail conspiracy theory circulating on the internet and radio talk shows theorize that the activity is directed by government officials. As a result, federal agencies have received thousands of complaints from people who have demanded an explanation. The existence of chemtrails has been repeatedly denied by government agencies and scientists around the world.

The United States Air Force has stated that the theory is a hoax which “has been investigated and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientific organizations, and major media publications”. The British Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has stated that chemtrails “are not scientifically recognized phenomena”. The Canadian Government has stated that “The term ‘chemtrails’ is a popularized expression, and there is no scientific evidence to support their existence.”

Well here is proof that chemtrials are not a hoax. Chemtrails is a United States rain enhancement program that uses specially-equipped aircraft designed to place seeding materials (in the form of pyrotechnic devices, or flares, containing silver iodide and other compounds) into convective towers (turrets of growing thunderstorms) to induce them to expand and process more atmospheric water. The evidence that chemtrailing does exist is provided by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation. The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation is the state’s umbrella occupational regulatory agency, responsible for the regulation of 29 occupations and industries.

The regulated industries are diverse, ranging from boxing to electricians, from elevators to auctioneers and Cloud Seeding. TDLR is governed by a seven member commission whose members are appointed by the Governor. To prohibit even the appearance of conflicts of interest, no commissioner may have a financial interest in any of the regulated programs.

The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation’s website unabashedly states their willing and intentional involvement in Cloud Seeding. Texas not only regulates the Chemtrail program they are providing state funding for it. “State matching funds were allocated to the sponsoring groups to enable them to procure needed hardware such as specially-equipped aircraft and ground-based radar systems. Each project initially constructed its program, either leasing or purchasing aircraft, at a cost of 8 to 9 cents per acre, with the State assuming up to 4.5 cents of that cost. Eventually, the State share of the cost declined, such that today virtually no residual State funds are used to sustain these programs. … the State began paying … for the programs in 1997” According to their website the United States government has been “rainmaking” since the 1950s. That would make the United States and Canadian governments conspirators in a top secret program of weather modification. The following statements is from the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation’s website.

“Texas has a lengthy history of using cloud seeding to lessen the impact of periodic, often severe, droughts. Numerous “rainmaking” efforts sprouted during the epic drought of the 1950s, and some continued into the 1960s, giving impetus to the Texas Legislature to adopt a law, in 1967, governing the use of weather modification technologies. In ensuing years, both the State and federal governments provided funds for both cloud seeding research and assessing the impact of commercial weather modification projects.

Each of the cloud seeding projects uses specially-equipped aircraft designed to place seeding materials (in the form of pyrotechnic devices, or flares, containing silver iodide and other compounds) into convective towers (turrets of growing thunderstorms) to induce them to expand and process more atmospheric water. The seeding is achieved by burning flares either mounted on the wings of single and twin-engine aircraft or held in racks, and dropped (ejected), from the underside of the aircraft fuselage. Pilots in the aircraft are directed to convective clouds believed by the meteorologist to be treatable with the seeding agent. Timing and targeting are the two critical factors in successful seeding of young thunderstorms. The concerted efforts of both pilot(s) and meteorologist are designed to give the growing cloud a “nudge” to enable it to be more efficient in the way it uses available cloud droplets to grow raindrops.”

West Texas Weather Modification Association (WTWMA)

“This project, based in San Angelo, is now in its thirteenth consecutive year of operation. Its target is the third largest in the state—some 6.4 million acres in west central Texas between Midland and San Angelo. The WTWMA employs a full-time meteorologist and pilots using Doppler weather radar data produced by the National Weather Service. The meteorologist is based at Mathis Field, while aircraft are located at the San Angelo airport as well as several other locations within the target area.

The project is one of two in the state with a dual purpose: Permits are held by the WTWMA for both rain enhancement and hail suppression operations. The way in which the Association obtained its aircraft and radar, and hired its permanent staff, in 1997-98, to become self-contained as a project served as a prototype for other rain enhancement programs that materialized in Texas later on. “

Edwards Aquifer Authority (EAA)

The EAA first initiated its own rain enhancement effort in 1998, using an out-of-state contractor for seeding operations based in Hondo. Since its inception, the aim of the project has been to put additional water on the ground, and into the aquifer that is the sole source of water for several million people living in South Central Texas, including the metropolis of San Antonio. After four years of contracted services, the EAA in 2003 assigned portions of its “old” target area to two well-established and independently-run cloud seeding projects nearby. Since then, three of the counties in its redefined target have been served by the South Texas Weather Modification Association, while a fourth county (Uvalde) has been included in the target of the Southwest Texas Rain Enhancement Association (based in Carrizo Springs).

Silver iodide

Silver iodide is an iodide that is used in photography, in seeding clouds to make rain, and in medicine. It can be used as cloud seeding agent in weather modification activities: increase rain and snow precipitations and suppression of hailstone. Silver iodide is more toxic than silver nitrate.

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
Trade Name: Silver Iodide
Chemical Nature: Inorganic Salt
Formula: AG-I

HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS
Percent: 100 Other Contaminants: None

EMERGENCY AND FIRST AID PROCEDURES:

Exposure Limits: TWA: 0.01 (mg/m3)
EYES: Wash eyes immediately with large amounts of water, occasionally lifting upper and lower lids, until no evidence of chemical remains (approximately 15-21 minutes). Get medical attention immediately.

SKIN: Remove contaminated clothing and shoes immediately. Wash affected area with soap or mild detergent and large amounts of water until no evidence of chemical remains (approximately 10- 20 minutes). Get medical attention immediately.

INHALATION: Remove from exposure area to fresh air immediately. If breathing has stopped, perform artificial respiration. Keep affected person warm and at rest. Get medical attention immediately.

INGESTION: If victim is conscious, immediately give 2 to 4 glasses of water and induce vomiting by touching finger to back of throat. Get medical attention immediately.

Toxicological Information
Routes of Entry: Eye contact. Inhalation. Ingestion.
Toxicity to Animals: Acute oral toxicity (LD50): 2820 mg/kg [Rat].
Toxic Effects on Humans: Hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of ingestion, of inhalation.

Steps to Be Taken If Spilled or Released: Ventilate confined spaces. sweep up, avoiding dispersion of dust, and collect in suitable container.

Target organ: chronic overexposure to a component or components in this material has been found to cause the following effects in laboratory animals:

- Kidney damage
- Eye damage
- Lung damage
- Liver damage
- Anemia
- Brain damage

Chronic overexposure to a component or components in this product has been suggested as a cause of the following effects in humans:

- Cardiac abnormalities
- Reports have associated repeated and prolonged overexposure to solvents with permanent brain and nervous system damage.

Dartmouth College - Hanover, NH 03755 USA also provides evidence of the existence of chemtrails. “In a modern version of the ancient “rain dance”, silver iodide can be dropped or “seeded” onto clouds to produce or increase rainfall. Scientists are now conducting studies in desert regions of the United States and Mexico, to quantify and validate this silver cloud-seeding technology, and to determine whether it would increase rainfall in drought-ridden areas. Normally, clouds produce rain when tiny particles of dust attract moisture and grow into raindrops. To mimic this natural effect, planes fly through the updraft under clouds using pyrotechnic flares to discharge “seeds” (tiny grains of silver) upward. Cloud-seeding technology raises some concerns that adding chemicals to clouds would pollute the air, water or earth.“

Why did the United States and NATO countries attack Afghanistan and why won’t they leave? The Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline!! The US wants its own pipeline. The Trans-Afghanistan pipeline is the major cause of WWIII - the United States World War of Terror. It is part of the United States foreign policy of American global military supremacy and to control Asian and Middle East oil production and distribution. It’s also why the US is now launching attacks in Pakistan. TAP or TAPI is a natural gas pipeline being developed by the Asian Development Bank. The pipeline will transport Caspian Sea natural gas from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan into Pakistan and then to India. Proponents of the project see it as a modern continuation of the Silk Road. The Afghan De facto government is expected to receive 8% of the project’s revenue.

Remember how the US spoke so harshly about the Soviets going in to Afghanistan? Well the US needed an excuse to go into Afghanistan themselves and take control so they fabricated human rights violations by the duly elected Taliban political party of Afghanistan. After the US attacked Afghanistan without provocation and overthrew the elected governing political party of the Afghan people the US used and plans on continuing to use a fictional threat of terrorism from the fictional terrorist group called Al Qaeda. Based on collected and corroborated evidence we now know the real reason why the US and NATO attacked Afghanistan. It had nothing to do with human right violations or terrorism. It was for petroleum. In the end its all about empire!

In 1995, Unocal first came up with the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline idea, even then a product of Washington’s fatal urge to bypass both Iran and Russia. Next, Unocal talked to the Turkmenbashi, then to the Taliban, and so launched a classic New Great Game gambit that has yet to end and without which you can’t understand the Afghan war Obama has inherited. In March of 1995 an inaugural memorandum of understanding between the governments of Turkmenistan and Pakistan for a pipeline project was signed. In August 1996, the Central Asia Gas Pipeline, Ltd. (CentGas) consortium for construction of a pipeline, led by US owned Unocal was formed.

A Taliban delegation, thanks to Unocal, enjoyed Houston’s hospitality in early 1997 and then Washington’s in December of that year. When it came to energy negotiations, the Taliban’s leadership was anything but medieval. They were tough bargainers, also cannily courting the Argentinean private oil company Bridas, which had secured the right to explore and exploit oil reserves in eastern Turkmenistan.

In August 1997, financially unstable Bridas sold 60% of its stock to Amoco, which merged the next year with British Petroleum. A key Amoco consultant happened to be that ubiquitous Eurasian player, former national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, while another such luminary, Henry Kissinger, just happened to be a consultant for Unocal. BP-Amoco, already developing the Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline, now became the major player in what had already been dubbed the Trans-Afghan Pipeline or TAP. On 27 October 1997, CentGas was incorporated in formal signing ceremonies in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan by several international oil companies along with the Government of Turkmenistan.

In January 1998, the Taliban, selecting CentGas over BP-Amoco, signed an agreement that allowed the proposed project to proceed. However, the US Unicol wasn’t happy with just a stake in the pipeline development, they wanted complete control of the pipeline. Unocal petitioned the US government (The Clinton administration) to overthrow the Afghan Taliban government to build a US controlled Trans-Afghan gas pipeline during a FEBRUARY 12, 1998 US Congressional hearing - “From the outset, we have made it clear that construction of the pipeline we have proposed across Afghanistan could not begin until a recognized government is in place that has the confidence of governments, lenders, and our company.” After word spread that Unicol had gained the support of the US government in June 1998, Russian Gazprom relinquishes its 10% stake in the project and Unocal withdrew entirely from the Central Asia Gas Pipeline consortium on 8 December 1998.

No sooner was George W. Bush declared president of the United States of American (never was elected president because according to the United States supreme law, that in the event of a tie in the electoral college, the Constitution dictated that the election would be decided by the House of Representatives - not a governor (brother of George W Bush) appointed state judge. The US Constitution states - “The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be no more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately choose by Ballot one of them for President: and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner choose the President. But in choosing the President, the Votes shall be taken by the states, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two-thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice.“), Unocal quickly got back into the oil takeover game and, as early as January 2001, was cozying up to the Taliban yet again, this time supported by a star-studded governmental cast of characters, including Undersecretary of State Richard Armitage, himself a former Unocal lobbyist. The Taliban were duly invited back to Washington in March 2001 via Rahmatullah Hashimi, a top aide to “The Shadow,” the movement’s leader Mullah Omar.

Negotiations eventually broke down because of transit fees the Taliban demanded. Until August 2001, the US government saw the Taliban regime “as a source of stability in Central Asia that would enable the construction of an oil pipeline across Central Asia” from the rich oilfields in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan, through Afghanistan and Pakistan, to the Indian Ocean. Until then the oil and gas reserves of Central Asia were controlled by Russia. The Bush government wanted to change all that.” But, confronted with Taliban’s refusal to accept US conditions, this rationale of energy security changed into a military one. Soon after the US government (president George W Bush, vice-president Dick Cheney, CIA director George Tenet, U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld) then threatened the TALIBAN: “Either you accept A CARPET OF GOLD or we will shower you with A CARPET OF BOMBS.” (This threat is confirmed in December 2001, in the book, “Bin Laden,The Hidden Truth”) At a G-8 summit meeting in Genoa, Italy in July 2001, Western diplomats indicated that the Bush administration had already decided to take the Taliban down before the year’s end. Two months earlier, on May 1, 2001 the US government made its intentions known through an ABC News report titled “U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba”. That ABC report laid out how the US government was going to get public support to start another World War. The attacks of September 11, 2001 was an attack based entirely on the 1962 US plan for terrorist attacks against the United States called Operation Northwoods - a false-flag plan that originated within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (the United States own state sponsored terrorist organization) or other US operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. Operation Northwoods included proposals for airline hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate a foreign government. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. The previously secret document was originally made public on November 18, 1997, by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board, a U.S. federal agency overseeing the release of government records related to John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

Less than one month after the September 11, 2001 hijackings of US commercial airlines by the CIA the United States government started WWIII with an unprovoked attack against Afghanistan on October 7, 2001. This time line alone gives evidence that the US made plans to attack Afghanistan and overthrow the Taliban government long before 9/11. In less than 30 days the United States government was able to plan and implement a military invasion of Afghanistan? IMPOSSIBLE.

Nicknamed “the kebab seller” in Kabul, Hamid Karzai, a former CIA asset and Unocal representative, who had entertained visiting Taliban members at barbecues in Houston while Bush was governor, was quickly installed by the US as Afghanistan’s new De facto president.

With the illegal invasion and occupation of Afghanistan by the US and NATO the 1998 Taliban Centgas agreement was quickly terminated. A new deal for building a US controlled Trans-Afghan-Pipeline was signed on 27 December 2002 by Turkmenistan’s Nyazov, US puppet Karzai and Pakistani President Musharraf - just 1 year after the United States launched its war of aggression attack against Afghanistan. In 2005, the Asian Development Bank submitted the final version of a feasibility study designed by British company Penspen. Since the United States military overthrew the Taliban ruling government, the project has essentially stalled; construction of the Turkmen part was supposed to start in 2006, but the overall feasibility is questionable since the southern part of the Afghan section runs through territory which continues to be under Taliban “freedom fighters” control.

On 24 April 2008, Pakistan, India and US controlled Afghanistan (Afghanistan is under a US military occupation and as such there is no legally or democratically recognized government) signed a framework agreement to buy natural gas from Turkmenistan.

The 1,680 kilometres (1,040 mi) pipeline will run from the Dauletabad gas field to Afghanistan. From there theTrans-Afghanistan Pipeline will be constructed alongside the highway running from Herat to Kandahar, and then via Quetta and Multan in Pakistan. The final destination of the pipeline will be the Indian town of Fazilka, near the border between Pakistan and India.

The pipeline will be 1,420 millimetres (56 in) in diameter with a working pressure of 100 atm. The initial capacity will be 27 billion cubic meter (bcm) of natural gas annually of which 2 bcm will be provided to Afghanistan and 12.5 bcm to both Pakistan and India. Later the capacity will increase to 33 bcm. Six compressor stations are to be constructed along the pipeline. The pipeline is expected to be operational by 2014 so don’t expect the US to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan for at least the next 5 years. Once the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline is complete the US will no doubt play the fictional terrorism threat excuse in order to stay in Afghanistan for decades to follow.

In a classified February 18, 1992: ’Wolfowitz Doctrine:’ “Proposal Advocates US as World’s Lone Superpower” the Defense Department (headed by Defense Secretary Dick Cheney and under the presidency of George H. W. Bush) called for concerted efforts to preserve American global military supremacy and to thwart the emergence of a rival superpower in Europe, Asia or the former Soviet Union. The 46-page memorandum describes itself as “definitive guidance from the Secretary of Defense (Dick Cheney)” for preparation of defense budgets for fiscal 1994 through 1999 (the Clintons terms in office as the president and first lady of the United States of America). “[W]e endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power. These regions include Western Europe, East Asia, the territory of the former Soviet Union and Southwest Asia.” The document advocates “a unilateral US defense guarantee” to Eastern Europe, “preferably in cooperation with other NATO states,” and foresees use of American military power to preempt or punish use of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, “even in conflicts that otherwise do not directly engage US interests.” Washington Post, 3/11/1992

Vaccines kill as many people as the viruses do! It’s true. The actual H1N1 (swine flue - modified with bird flu) didn’t kill as many people as did the vaccine used. In fact, today the vaccines are much more dangerous than the diseases they supposedly prevent. These are facts supported by actual figures. What makes it even more horrible is that there is a simple, cheap, and more effective cure for viral diseases.

Of these factors, by far the most important is the time involved. Doubling in strength every 20 minutes is very quick, and small amounts that kill less than half in an hour are virtually worthless. Big Pharma has used this to “scientifically prove” in several “peer reviewed” Medical Journal pieces that Vitamin C is not useful against virues (colds, flus, etc). If the real facts about vitamin C are known, then Big Pharma would lose billions in cold and flu drugs that are not as effective.

Above article written by ~ Dr Phil Bate, Orthomolecular Pioneer.

Vitamin D deficiency linked to all diseases and illnesses

A group of scientists from UCLA recently published a paper in the prestigious journal, Nature. In that paper the UCLA group revealed that a naturally occurring steroid hormone - a hormone most of us take for granted - was a very potent antibiotic. Instead of directly killing bacteria and viruses, the steroid hormone under question increases the body’s production of a remarkable class of proteins, called antimicrobial peptides. The 200 known antimicrobial peptides directly and rapidly destroy the cell walls of bacteria, fungi, and viruses, including the influenza virus, and play a key role in keeping the lungs free of infection. The steroid hormone that showed these remarkable antibiotic properties was plain old vitamin D. What is the best source for getting an ample daily dosage of Vitamin D - free of charge? 20 minutes outside. Exposure to the Sun for just 20 minutes gives your body more Vitamin D than any store bought or man made supplement.

The milk Americans depend on for their vitamin D contains no naturally occurring vitamin D at all; instead, the U.S. government requires fortified milk to be supplemented with vitamin D, but only with what we now know to be a paltry 100 units per eight-ounce glass.

The vitamin D steroid hormone system has always had its origins in the skin, not in the mouth. Until quite recently, when dermatologists and governments began warning us about the dangers of sunlight, humans made enormous quantities of vitamin D where humans have always made it, where naked skin meets the ultraviolet B radiation of sunlight. We just cannot get adequate amounts of vitamin D from our diet. We make about a thousand units of vitamin D a day just from sunlight exposure.

A single, twenty-minute, skin exposure to the summer sun will trigger our body to produce and deliver 20,000 units of vitamin D into the circulation of most people within 48 hours. Our body produces 20,000 units of Vitamin D naturally and freely - without the aid of any supplements or drugs. Twenty thousand units, that’s the single most important fact about vitamin D. Compare that to the 100 units you get from a glass of milk, or the several hundred daily units the U.S. government recommend as “Adequate Intake.”

Humans evolved naked in sub-equatorial Africa, where the sun shines directly overhead much of the year and where our species must have obtained tens of thousands of units of vitamin D every day, in spite of our skin developing heavy melanin concentrations (racial pigmentation) for protecting the deeper layers of the skin. Even after humans migrated to temperate latitudes, where our skin rapidly lightened to allow for more rapid vitamin D production, humans worked outdoors. However, in the last three hundred years, we began to work indoors; in the last one hundred years, we began to travel inside cars; in the last several decades, we began to lather on sunblock and consciously avoid sunlight. All of these things lower vitamin D blood levels. The inescapable conclusion is that vitamin D levels in modern humans are not just low - they are aberrantly low.

Sunlight is the only effective treatment against colds, flus, influenza virus and every major disease known to man. In the last several years, dozens of medical studies have called attention to worldwide vitamin D deficiency, especially among African Americans and the elderly, the two groups most likely to die from influenza. Cancer, heart disease, stroke, autoimmune disease, depression, chronic pain, depression, gum disease, diabetes, hypertension, and a number of other diseases have recently been associated with vitamin D deficiency.

Vitamin D deficiency accounts for hundreds of thousands of deaths every year? Studies have found the influenza virus is present in the population year-around; why is it a wintertime illness? Even the common cold got its name because it is common in cold weather and rare in the summer. Vitamin D blood levels are at their highest in the summer but reach their lowest levels during the flu and cold season.

Scientific Facts:

1. The flu predictably occurs in the months following the winter solstice, when vitamin D levels are at their lowest,

2. The flu disappears in the months following the summer solstice,

3. Influenza is more common in the tropics during the rainy season,

4. The cold and rainy weather associated with El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), which drives people indoors and lowers vitamin D blood levels, is associated with influenza,

5. The incidence of influenza is inversely correlated with outdoor temperatures,

6. Children exposed to sunlight are less likely to get colds,

7. Cod liver oil (which contains vitamin D) reduces the incidence of viral respiratory infections,

8. Vitamin D-producing UVB lamps reduced colds and flu in schoolchildren and factory workers,

9. Volunteers, deliberately infected with a weakened flu virus - first in the summer and then again in the winter - show significantly different clinical courses in the different seasons,

10. The elderly who live in countries with high vitamin D consumption, like Norway, are less likely to die in the winter,

11. Children with vitamin D deficiency and rickets suffer from frequent respiratory infections,

12. Physicians who gave high doses of vitamin D to children who were constantly sick from colds and the flu, found the treated children were suddenly free from infection,

13. The elderly are so much more likely to die from heart attacks in the winter rather than in the summer,

14. African Americans, with their low vitamin D blood levels, are more likely to die from influenza and pneumonia than Whites are.

Vitamin D deficiency has repeatedly been associated with many of the diseases of civilization. Lack of sunlight exposure is why we are vitamin D deficient and why we are inflicted by disease, colds, flus and influenza viruses. Lack of sunlight exposure is why thousands of people die each year. Sunlight is a hundred times more effective than any toxic and life threatening vaccine.

In September 2001 President George W. Bush declared a “War on Terrorism” and vowed to destroy all terrorist organizations “with a global reach”. For the good of both America and the rest of the world he should have started with the largest international terrorist organization of them all — the US own CIA.

The concept of “terrorism” is not clear and there is no generally agreed upon definition of the term. It is, however, a tactic, a means to a particular end. A tactic can always be used, and is always a possible course of action for some group or other. Once this is understood it is clear that it is ridiculous to declare a “War on Terrorism” — one cannot defeat a tactic. To declare a war on terrorism is to declare perpetual war (which, in fact, is the intention).

“Terrorism” is here taken to mean the practice of the deliberate inflicting (either directly or indirectly) of harm, injury, death and/or destruction upon a civilian target sufficient to cause horror, revulsion or despair among civilian populations and/or their political leaders, with the goal of causing those populations or political leaders to act in a way desired by the terrorists.

The CIA was created just after the end of World War II (from an OSS riddled with Nazi war criminals) by an act of Congress (and Congress can eliminate it in the same way). Its official purpose is to function primarily as an intelligence-gathering organization (at least, that’s what we are supposed to believe) but in fact it has always been something different from that.

The CIA is not now nor has it ever been a central intelligence agency. It is the illegal covert action arm of the President’s foreign policy advisers. In that capacity it illegally overthrows or supports foreign governments while reporting “intelligence” justifying those activities. It shapes its intelligence, even in such critical areas as Soviet nuclear weapons capability, to support presidential policy. Disinformation is a large part of its illegal covert action responsibility, and the American people are the primary target of its lies.

The CIA has been a terrorist organization from its beginnings, when it included a large number of former Nazi war criminals who were smuggled to the US after WWII — former members of the Gestapo and the Nazi military intelligence (such as Reinhard Gehlen). Unlike smaller terrorist organizations such as ETA the CIA does not normally engage directly in terrorism by sending its employees to plant bombs, etc. Rather, it tends to act through intermediaries and agents, sometimes making use of U.S. military personnel. A large number of foreign nationals are recruited by the CIA and trained to perform various acts of terrorism against the United States of America and its people and against foreign countries.

The CIA is responsible for all of the most recent terrorist attacks against the US and foreign countries. The CIA organized the failed Bay of Pigs attack against Cuba and because the US White House refused to provide any military support for such an illegal act they assassinated the president of the United States of America, John F Kennedy and later JFk’s brother and United States Attorney General Robert Kennedy. On September 11, 2001 the CIA and their foreign national operatives, acting on orders from then US president George W Bush, flew several unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) remotely into the towers of the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon. In December 2007 the CIA assassinated Benazir Bhutto.

That the CIA is a terrorist organization is clear from its record of terrorist activities (sometimes called “counterinsurgency” or “low intensity conflict”). Here are just a few more CIA terrorism examples:

* During the Vietnam war the CIA conducted Operation Phoenix, an assassination program. The goal was not only to eliminate those Vietnamese who might oppose the U.S. (which in practice meant most of the population of Vietnam) but also to terrorize the entire population of South Vietnam and to suppress opposition to the occupying U.S. forces. Over 20,000 Vietnamese were murdered, often at random.

* The CIA also recruited a mercenary army in Vietnam (financed by profits from the CIA’s heroin smuggling), particularly from among the Hmong villagers, which was used to terrorize the civilian population and to prevent them from assisting the Viet Cong.

* The CIA organized and financed (with the profits from its cocaine smuggling) the activities of the Contras in Nicaragua, who murdered tens of thousands of civilians, and tried to disrupt the economy, in an attempt to destabilize the legitimate Sandinista government. (For this the U.S. was condemned in the World Court for engaging in international terrorism, and it rejected a U.N. security council resolution calling upon it to observe international law.)

* The CIA planned and organized the military coup d’etat in 1973 in Chile which overthrew the legitimately elected government of Salvador Allende (because he would not implement economic policies designed in Washington to favor American corporations doing business in Chile) and brought to power the regime of General Augusto Pinochet; this regime abducted, tortured and killed thousands of Chilean citizens in an attempt to suppress opposition.

* The CIA organized and supported the Turkish government’s persecution of its Kurdish minority during the 1990s, resulting in tens of thousands of deaths and millions of refuges; the aim being the suppression of Kurdish culture and the elimination of Kurdish demands for a separate state.

* ClA-supported Mujahedeen rebels (who in 2001 were part of the “Northern Alliance” which became the core of the new Afghani government following the U.S. attack on Afghanistan in late 2001) engaged heavily in drug trafficking while fighting against the Soviet-supported government and its plans to reform the very backward Afghan society. The CIA’s principal client was Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, one of the leading druglords and a leading heroin refiner. CIA-supplied trucks and mules, which had carried arms into Afghanistan, were used to transport opium to laboratories along the Afghan/Pakistan border. The output provided up to one half of the heroin used annually in the United States and three-quarters of that used in Western Europe. U.S. officials admitted in 1990 that they had failed to investigate or take action against the drug operation because of a desire not to offend their Pakistani and Afghan allies.

* The U.S. CIA has long been deeply involved in the international trafficking of the addictive drugs heroin and (since the early 1980s, if not earlier) cocaine, the enormous profits from which have financed, and continue to finance, both U.S. illegal covert operations and the U.S. military (via payments to Pentagon contractors). The main reason why this is not more widely known is that the main players in the U.S. media have always worked to protect the CIA and to keep the American public in the dark as to the nature of its illegal drug trafficking and terrorism activities (as documented in great detail in Carl Bernstein’s article in the October 20, 1977, issue of Rolling Stone: “The CIA and the Media: How America’s Most Powerful News Media Worked Hand in Glove with the Central Intelligence Agency and Why the Church Committee Covered It Up”).

* In order to sidestep international laws against torture, the CIA currently uses a fleet of unmarked civilian airplanes to kidnap, “render,” and “disappear” suspected terrorists. The CIA takes these people to a clandestine network of prisons in countries such as Syria, Afghanistan, Egypt, Morocco, Iraq, Poland, and Romania: places where they are tortured.

The terrorism crimes of the CIA are too many to list. The CIA’s terrorist activities is World wide with illegal terrorist activities involving over forty countries. CIA operations follow the same recurring script. First, American business interests abroad are threatened by a popular or democratically elected leader. The people support their leader because he intends to conduct land reform, strengthen unions, redistribute wealth, nationalize foreign-owned industry, and regulate business to protect workers, consumers and the environment.

So, on behalf of American business, and often with their help, the CIA mobilizes the opposition. First it identifies right-wing groups within the country (usually the military), and offers them a deal: “We’ll put you in power if you maintain a favorable business climate for us.” The Agency then hires, trains and works with them to overthrow the existing government (usually a democracy). It uses every trick in the book: propaganda, stuffed ballot boxes, purchased elections, extortion, blackmail, sexual intrigue, false stories about opponents in the local media, infiltration and disruption of opposing political parties, kidnapping, beating, torture, intimidation, economic sabotage, death squads and even assassination.

These efforts culminate in a military coup, which installs a right-wing dictator. The CIA trains the dictator’s security apparatus to crack down on the traditional enemies of big business, using interrogation, torture and murder. The victims are said to be “communists” [or these days “terrorists”] but almost always they are just peasants, liberals, moderates, labor union leaders, political opponents and advocates of free speech and democracy. Widespread human rights abuses follow.

It’s not that the CIA is a rogue organization, out of control. The CIA implements the policies of the President of the United States. The CIA does whatever the US president orders it to do. The CIA carries out unofficial and grossly illegal U.S. government policy. That the CIA is a terrorist organization, financed and ordered to carry out terrorist acts against foreign states as well as the US and its people, implies that the United States government is a state sponsor of Terrorism - they have repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism. Considering the millions of deaths that the U.S. has caused and the enormous suffering that its international policies produce, its hypocrisy in condemning other countries as “terrorist states”.

“The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.” ~ John F Kennedy New York City, April 27, 1961

The Zionist ideology is antithetical to the Torah. Zionism was deviously designed to replace the Torah and its holy, God given commandments with nationalistic, power-driven ideals that are devoid of holiness. What more proof does one need than the fact that for centuries, Jews have lived peacefully in Arabic countries, enjoying the respect and friendship of their neighbors? The tragedy of Zionism changed all of that. The painful truth is that in the eyes of the Zionist government, Jews are merely the cannon-fodder needed for the State of Israel to achieve its agenda.

The relatively new concept of Zionism began only about one hundred years ago and since that time Torah true Jewry has steadfastly opposed the Zionist ideology. This struggle is rooted in two convictions:

1. Zionism, by advocating a political and military end to the Jewish exile, denies the very essence of Jews Diaspora existence. Jews are in exile by Divine Decree and may emerge from exile solely via Divine Redemption. All human efforts to alter a metaphysical reality are doomed to end in failure and bloodshed. History has clearly borne out this teaching.

2. Zionism has not only denied Jews fundamental belief in Heavenly Redemption it has also created a pseudo-Judaism which views the essence of thir identity to be a secular nationalism. Accordingly, Zionism and the Israeli state have consistently endeavored, via persuasion and coercion, to replace a Divine and Torah centered understanding of our people hood with an armed materialism.

The true Jewish position on Zionism and the state called Israel is found in the Scriptures in the Talmud and in the oral traditions transmitted to all Jews by their parents and teachers.

At the outset of the Jews’ exile to Babylonia, the Prophet Jeremiah, in chapter 29 of his book proclaimed God’s message to all the exiled…Verse seven reads, “Seek out the welfare of the city to which I have exiled you and pray for it to the Almighty, for through its welfare will you have welfare.” This has been a cornerstone of Jewish “foreign policy” how to behave in the lands of the nations throughout our ensuing exiles till this very day.

There Jeremiah adds in the name of God (verses 8 and 9), “Do not let your false prophets among you and your sorcerers seduce you, do not head your dreamers which you cause them to dream. For they speak falsely to you in My name. I did not send them.” This too has applied to all the would-be misleaders of Jewry whether they presented themselves as prophets or as sorcerers or as dreamers of national aspirations.

King Solomon in Song of Songs thrice adjured the “daughters of Jerusalem” not to arouse or bestir the love until it is ready.” The Talmud explains That Jews have been forsworn, by three strong oaths;

1) not to ascend to the Holy Land as a group using force,
2) not to rebel against the governments of countries in which they live, and
3) not by their sins, to prolong the coming of moshiach;

as is written in Tractate Kesubos 111a .

Before World War II, most Hasidic rabbis, as well as many other prominent Orthodox leaders, believed that God had promised to return the Jewish people to the land of Israel by means of the actions of the Jewish Messiah who would be sent if the Jewish people merited his arrival. During the current exile, the Jewish people are expected to perform the mitzvot. (Mitzvot refers to the divine commandments given in the Torah. The term also refers to the fulfillment of a mitzvah- commandment. According to the teachings of Judaism, all moral laws are, or are derived from the divine commandments.) In addition, they are advised not to antagonize or rebel against the gentile nations of the world in the course of their long exile in the diaspora. God freed the Jews from bondage and persecution. God exiled them from bondage and persecution. They were freed to scatter throughout the World. For over 2000 years the Jews lived in peace and harmony. The secret to this success was because they lived their lives by God’s edict of, “Not by might, nor by power, but by My spirit”

This peace and harmony ended with the creation of Zionism. Zionists encouraged and even aided Hitler in the persecution and Holocaust of the peaceful Jewish people. The term “Zionism” was coined in 1891 by the Austrian publicist Nathan Birnbaum, to describe the new ideology. It is was used to describe anyone who believes Jews should end God’s imposed exile and return to their ancient homeland. The Zionist movement was founded by Theodor Herzl in 1897. He was born in Budapest in 1860, and educated in the spirit of the German ­ Jewish Enlightenment, as a secular Jew. In 1878 the Herzls moved to Vienna, where Theodor Herzl studied law in the university of Vienna, graduating in 1884. However, rather than practicing law, Herzl became a writer, a playwright and a journalist. Despite ridicule from Jewish leaders, he published The Jewish State (Der Judenstaat) in 1896. Herzl claimed that the Jews could gain acceptance in the world only if they stopped being an anomaly among nations. He asserted that the scattered Jews are one people. Their plight could be transformed into a positive force by the establishment of a Jewish state guaranteed in international (public) law - “volkerrechtig” — with the consent of the great powers.

They, for the next 6 decades, have tried to establish a Jewish state, not with the consent of God but with the consent of the super powers of the 20th century. They have forsaken the Torah by forcing their will unto the World through antagonism, provocation and rebellion. They have shed the blood of the innocent in defiance of divine law, in order to form a God forbidden state. For over 40 years Zionists have not only violated the divine commandments, they have violated modern laws that were made to preserve and protect peace and harmony throughout the Middle East and the World.

From 1967 to 1989 the UN Security Council passed 131 resolutions directly dealing with the Arab-Israeli conflict. Of the 131 resolutions passed, 43 could be considered neutral while the remaining 88 either criticized and opposed the actions of Israel or judged against its interests. Nearly half of the 88 resolutions against Israel “condemned”, “censured” or “deplored” the member state or its actions. During this time, in the UN General Assembly, 429 resolutions against Israel were passed, and Israel was condemned 321 times. The United States has used its veto power to prevent resolutions concerning Israel from passing through the Security Council on 42 occasions since 1970.

The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, also Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT or NNPT) is a treaty to limit the spread of nuclear weapons, opened for signature on July 1, 1968. There are currently 189 countries party to the treaty, five of which have nuclear weapons: the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, and the People’s Republic of China (the permanent members of the UN Security Council) .

Only four recognized sovereign states are not parties to the treaty: India, Israel, Pakistan and North Korea. India and Pakistan both possess and have openly tested nuclear bombs. Israel has had a policy of opacity regarding its own nuclear weapons program. Israel continue to develop more lethal nuclear weapons and refuses to allow international access to their program. Their nuclear program is very secretive and developed solely for use as a weapon of mass destruction against its so called enemies yet no country is calling for sanctions against them whenever they threaten and attack a neighboring state. Israel has committed war crimes . Iran has not. Israel has attacked and killed civilians repeatedly. Iran has not. Israel is settling occupied land - a violation of international law. Iran does not occupy or does not have any settlements on foreign and sovereign states.

Amnesty International accused Israel of war crimes, saying it broke international law by deliberately destroying Lebanon’s civilian infrastructure during its recent war with Hezbollah guerrillas.

The human rights group said initial evidence, including the pattern and scope of the Israeli attacks, high number of civilian casualties, widespread damage and statements by Israeli officials “indicate that such destruction was deliberate and part of a military strategy, rather than ‘collateral damage.’”

Amnesty International, whose delegates monitored the fighting in both Israel and Lebanon, said Israel violated international laws banning direct attacks on civilians and barring indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks.

War crimes are defined in the statute that established the International Criminal Court, which includes:

1. Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, such as:
1. Willful killing, or causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health - Israel is guilty
2. Torture or inhumane treatment - Israel is guilty
3. Unlawful wanton destruction or appropriation of property - Israel is guilty
4. Forcing a prisoner of war to serve in the forces of a hostile power
5. Depriving a prisoner of war of a fair trial - Israel is guilty
6. Unlawful deportation, confinement or transfer - Israel is guilty
7. Taking hostages - Israel is guilty

2. The following acts as part of an international conflict:
1. Directing attacks against civilians - Israel is guilty
2. Directing attacks against humanitarian workers or UN peacekeepers - Israel is guilty
3. Killing a surrendered combatant - Israel is guilty
4. Misusing a flag of truce - Israel is guilty
5. Settlement of occupied territory - Israel is guilty
6. Deportation of inhabitants of occupied territory - Israel is guilty
7. Using poison weapons - Israel is guilty
8. Using civilians as shields - Israel is guilty
9. Using child soldiers

3. The following acts as part of a non-international conflict:
1. Murder, cruel or degrading treatment and torture - Israel is guilty
2. Directing attacks against civilians, humanitarian workers or UN peacekeepers - Israel is guilty
3. Taking hostages - Israel is guilty
4. Summary execution - Israel is guilty
5. Pillage - Israel is guilty
6. Rape, sexual slavery, forced prostitution or forced pregnancy

United Nations General Assembly resolutions related to Israel

* 1947 November 29: UN General Assembly Resolution 181: the 1947 UN Partition Plan, accepted by Jews and rejected by Arabs, as well as the governments of Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, who claimed that the UN had no authority to pass such resolutions
* 1948 December 11: UN General Assembly Resolution 194: the conditional right of return of Palestinian refugees
* 1949 May 11: UN General Assembly Resolution 273: admission of Israel to the UN
* 1975 March 22: UN General Assembly Resolution 3379: equating Zionism with Racism
* 1991 December 16: UN General Assembly Resolution 4686: annulled Res. 3379

United Nations Security Council resolutions against Israel

1. Resolution 42: The Palestine Question (5 March 1948) Requests recommendations for the Palestine Commission
2. Resolution 43: The Palestine Question (1 Apr 1948) Recognizes “increasing violence and disorder in Palestine” and requests that representatives of “the Jewish Agency for Palestine and the Arab Higher Committee” arrange, with the Security Council, “a truce between the Arab and Jewish Communities of Palestine…Calls upon Arab and Jewish armed groups in Palestine to cease acts of violence immediately.”
3. Resolution 44: The Palestine Question (1 Apr 1948) Requests convocation of special session of the General Assembly
4. Resolution 46: The Palestine Question (17 Apr 1948) As the United Kingdom is the Mandatory Power, “it is responsible for the maintenance of peace and order in Palestine.” The Resolutions also “Calls upon all persons and organizations in Palestine” to stop importing “armed bands and fighting personnel…whatever their origin;…weapons and war materials;…Refrain, pending the future government of Palestine…from any political activity which might prejudice the rights, claims, or position of either community;…refrain from any action which will endager the safety of the Holy Places in Palestine.”
5. Resolution 48: The Palestine Question (23 Apr 1948)
6. Resolution 49: The Palestine Question (22 May 1948)
7. Resolution 50: The Palestine Question (29 May 1948)
8. Resolution 53: The Palestine Question (7 Jul 1948)
9. Resolution 54: The Palestine Question (15 Jul 1948)
10. Resolution 56: The Palestine Question (19 Aug 1948)
11. Resolution 57: The Palestine Question (18 Sep 1948)
12. Resolution 59: The Palestine Question (19 Oct 1948)
13. Resolution 60: The Palestine Question (29 Oct 1948)
14. Resolution 61: The Palestine Question (4 Nov 1948)
15. Resolution 62: The Palestine Question (16 Nov 1948)
16. Resolution 66: The Palestine Question (29 Dec 1948)
17. Resolution 72: The Palestine Question (11 Aug 1949)
18. Resolution 73: The Palestine Question (11 Aug 1949)
19. Resolution 89 (17 November 1950): regarding Armistice in 1948 Arab-Israeli War and “transfer of persons”.
20. Resolution 92: The Palestine Question (8 May 1951)
21. Resolution 93: The Palestine Question (18 May 1951)
22. Resolution 95: The Palestine Question (1 Sep 1951)
23. Resolution 100: The Palestine Question (27 Oct 1953)
24. Resolution 101: The Palestine Question (24 Nov 1953)
25. Resolution 106: The Palestine Question (29 Mar 1955) ‘condemns’ Israel for Gaza raid.
26. Resolution 107: The Palestine Question (30 Mar)
27. Resolution 108: The Palestine Question (8 Sep)
28. Resolution 111: ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people”.
29. Resolution 127: ” … ‘recommends’ Israel suspends its ‘no-man’s zone’ in Jerusalem”.
30. Resolution 162: ” … ‘urges’ Israel to comply with UN decisions”.
31. Resolution 171: ” … determines flagrant violations’ by Israel in its attack on Syria”.
32. Resolution 228: ” … ‘censures’ Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control”.
33. Resolution 237: ” … ‘urges’ Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees”.
34. Resolution 242 (November 22, 1967): Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area. Calls on Israel’s neighbors to end the state of belligerency and calls upon Israel to reciprocate by withdraw its forces from land claimed by other parties in 1967 war. Interpreted commonly today as calling for the Land for peace principle as a way to resolve Arab-Israeli conflict
35. Resolution 248: ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan”.
36. Resolution 250: ” … ‘calls’ on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem”.
37. Resolution 251: ” … ‘deeply deplores’ Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250”.
38. Resolution 252: ” … ‘declares invalid’ Israel’s acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital”.
39. Resolution 256: ” … ‘condemns’ Israeli raids on Jordan as ‘flagrant violation”.
40. Resolution 259: ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation”.
41. Resolution 262: ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for attack on Beirut airport”.
42. Resolution 265: ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for air attacks for Salt in Jordan”.
43. Resolution 267: ” … ‘censures’ Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem”.
44. Resolution 270: ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon”.
45. Resolution 271: ” … ‘condemns’ Israel’s failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem”.
46. Resolution 279: ” … ‘demands’ withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon”.
47. Resolution 280: ” … ‘condemns’ Israeli’s attacks against Lebanon”.
48. Resolution 285: ” … ‘demands’ immediate Israeli withdrawal form Lebanon”.
49. Resolution 298: ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s changing of the status of Jerusalem”.
50. Resolution 313: ” … ‘demands’ that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon”.
51. Resolution 316: ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon”.
52. Resolution 317: ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon”.
53. Resolution 332: ” … ‘condemns’ Israel’s repeated attacks against Lebanon”.
54. Resolution 337: ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for violating Lebanon’s sovereignty”.
55. Resolution 338 (22 October 1973): cease fire in Yom Kippur War
56. Resolution 339 (23 October 1973): Confirms Res. 338, dispatch UN observers.
57. Resolution 347: ” … ‘condemns’ Israeli attacks on Lebanon”.
58. Resolution 3379: “…’establishes’ Zionism as a form of racism and racial discrimination. Repealed by Resolution 46|86
59. Resolution 425 (1978): ‘calls’ on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon”. Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon was completed as of 16 June 2000.
60. Resolution 350 (31 May 1974) established the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force, to monitor the ceasefire between Israel and Syria in the wake of the Yom Kippur War.
61. Resolution 427: ” … ‘calls’ on Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon.
62. Resolution 444: ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces”.
63. Resolution 446 (1979): ‘determines’ that Israeli settlements are a ’serious obstruction’ to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention”.
64. Resolution 450: ” … ‘calls’ on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon”.
65. Resolution 452: ” … ‘calls’ on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories”.
66. Resolution 465: ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s settlements and asks all member states not to assist Israel’s settlements program”.
67. Resolution 467: ” … ’strongly deplores’ Israel’s military intervention in Lebanon”.
68. Resolution 468: ” … ‘calls’ on Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return”.
69. Resolution 469: ” … ’strongly deplores’ Israel’s failure to observe the council’s order not to deport Palestinians”.
70. Resolution 471: ” … ‘expresses deep concern’ at Israel’s failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention”.
71. Resolution 476: ” … ‘reiterates’ that Israel’s claim to Jerusalem are ‘null and void’”.
72. Resolution 478 (20 August 1980): ‘censures (Israel) in the strongest terms’ for its claim to Jerusalem in its ‘Basic Law’.
73. Resolution 484: ” … ‘declares it imperative’ that Israel re-admit two deported Palestinian mayors”.
74. Resolution 487: ” … ’strongly condemns’ Israel for its attack on Iraq’s nuclear facility”.
75. Resolution 497 (17 December 1981) decides that Israel’s annexation of Syria’s Golan Heights is ‘null and void’ and demands that Israel rescinds its decision forthwith.
76. Resolution 498: ” … ‘calls’ on Israel to withdraw from Lebanon”.
77. Resolution 501: ” … ‘calls’ on Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops”.
78. Resolution 508:
79. Resolution 509: ” … ‘demands’ that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith and unconditionally from Lebanon”.
80. Resolution 515: ” … ‘demands’ that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and allow food supplies to be brought in”.
81. Resolution 517: ” … ‘censures’ Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon”.
82. Resolution 518: ” … ‘demands’ that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon”.
83. Resolution 520: ” … ‘condemns’ Israel’s attack into West Beirut”.
84. Resolution 573: ” … ‘condemns’ Israel ‘vigorously’ for bombing Tunisia in attack on PLO headquarters.
85. Resolution 587 ” … ‘takes note’ of previous calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw”.
86. Resolution 592: ” … ’strongly deplores’ the killing of Palestinian students at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops”.
87. Resolution 605: ” … ’strongly deplores’ Israel’s policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians.
88. Resolution 607: ” … ‘calls’ on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.
89. Resolution 608: ” … ‘deeply regrets’ that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians”.
90. Resolution 636: ” … ‘deeply regrets’ Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians.
91. Resolution 641: ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s continuing deportation of Palestinians.
92. Resolution 672: ” … ‘condemns’ Israel for “violence against Palestinians” at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount.
93. Resolution 673: ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to cooperate with the United Nations.
94. Resolution 681: ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s resumption of the deportation of Palestinians.
95. Resolution 694: ” … ‘deplores’ Israel’s deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return.
96. Resolution 726: ” … ’strongly condemns’ Israel’s deportation of Palestinians.
97. Resolution 799: “. . . ’strongly condemns’ Israel’s deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for their immediate return.
98. Resolution 1559 (2 September 2004) called upon Lebanon to establish its sovereignty over all of its land and called upon Syria to end their military presence in Lebanon by withdrawing its forces and to cease intervening in internal Lebanese politics. The resolution also called on all Lebanese militias to disband.
99. Resolution 1583 (28 January 2005) calls on Lebanon to assert full control over its border with Israel. It also states that “the Council has recognized the Blue Line as valid for the purpose of confirming Israel’s withdrawal pursuant to resolution 425.
100. Resolution 1648 (21 December 2005) renewed the mandate of United Nations Disengagement Observer Force until 30 June 2006.
101. Resolution 1701 (11 August 2006) called for the full cessation of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah.

Impeachment in the United States is an expressed power of the legislature that allows for formal charges against a civil officer of government for crimes committed in office.

Impeachment is similar to an indictment in a regular court proceedings, while the trial for impeachment is similar to a trial before judge and jury in regular courts.

Article Two of the United States Constitution (Section 4) states that “The President, Vice President, and all other civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.” According to the United States Constitution, the House of Representatives has the sole power of impeaching, while the United States Senate has the sole power to try all impeachments. The removal of impeached officials is automatic upon conviction in the Senate.

Impeachment is a Constitutional requirement and guarantee that no criminal shall hold any civil office in the United States government. It doesn’t matter what type of crime has been committed, criminals are strictly forbidden from holding any office of the United States. The United States Constitution regards any crime, whether it be Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors to be unacceptable conduct by the President, Vice-President and all other civil officers of the United States government. Not even a misdemeanor is acceptable behavior for any government official and if any elected official is accused of committing any type of crime then the United States Constitution requires for the House of Representatives to indict any and all such crimes and requires the Senate to try all indictments.

At the Philadelphia Convention, Benjamin Franklin noted that, historically, the removal of “obnoxious” chief executives had been accomplished by assassination. Franklin suggested that a proceduralized mechanism for removal — impeachment — would be preferable.

Impeachment proceedings may be commenced by any member of the House of Representatives on their own initiative, either by presenting a listing of the charges under oath, or by asking for referral to the appropriate committee. The impeachment process may also be triggered by non-members - from a special prosecutor, the President, a state or territorial legislature, grand jury, or by petition. Once an indictment is formally filed against any government official the accused is required by law to be put on trial for his or her crimes, with each side having the right to call witnesses and perform cross-examinations. The House members, who are given the collective title of managers during the course of the trial, present the prosecution case (representing, the people) versus the impeached official (the defendant) who has the right to mount a defense with his own attorneys as well. Senators must take an oath or affirmation that they will perform their duties honestly and with due diligence. After hearing the charges, the Senate usually makes a judgment in private. A two-thirds majority vote is required for a conviction of the corrupt government official.

The Senate enters judgment on its decision, whether that be to convict or acquit, and a copy of the judgment is filed with the Secretary of State - presently Hillary Clinton, who has been consistently indicted for, sued for, subpoenaed for and accused of bribery, fraud, tax evasion, FEC violations, perjury and many other High Crimes and Misdemeanors - all criminal activities that are forbidden by the Unites States Constitution. Upon conviction, the official is automatically removed from office and may also be barred from holding future office. The removed official is also liable to criminal prosecution. The President may not grant a pardon in the impeachment case, but may in any resulting criminal case.

Only two U.S. Presidents have ever been impeached: Andrew Johnson (went to trial) and Bill Clinton (went to trial). Both were acquitted at trial. Richard Nixon resigned in the face of the near certainty of his impeachment for his role in the Watergate scandal (the break-in to the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate office complex in Washington), which had already been approved by the House Judiciary Committee. Nixon was the only President to resign the office. Bill Clinton was impeached for a misdemeanor of the least importance (frivolous) yet he was still put on trial for what the United States Constitution considered an impeachable (criminal) offense.

What does the United States Constitution consider to be an impeachable (criminal) offense? Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Treason

The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offense is punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court. LEVYING WAR, is the assembling of a body of men for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable object; and all who perform any part however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are leagued in the general conspiracy, are considered as engaged in levying war, within the meaning of the constitution. The attacks of September 11, 2001 was treason, committed by George W Bush (President), Dick Cheney (Vice-President), Donald Rumsfeld (Secretary of Defense), Condoleezza Rice (National Security Advisor), George Tenet (CIA), Colin Powell (65th Secretary of State), Robert Mueller (FBI) and other high ranking United States government officials. The White House assembled a body of men (CIA operatives) for the purpose of effecting by force the missile (an unmanned, remotely controlled commercial airline is a very large cruise missile) attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001. The men assembled were commanded by the most senior United States government officials to perform duties for the purpose of effecting by force the treasonable act. Everyone that was assembled by Dick Cheney in the War Room of the White House on the morning of September 11, 2001. Every CIA agent who flew the drones and piloted from the ground, by remote control, the unmanned replicas of US commercial airlines into the World Trade Centers. The assembled men who wired the World Trade Center Towers with thermite for their controlled demolition on September 11, 2001. The assembled men at NORAD who distracted the United States Air Force from performing their duties to defend the United States by having them engage in simulations and drill exercises the morning of September 11, 2001. The assembled men that launched the cruise missile against the Pentagon. The Media giants who mislead, tricked, misinformed, and flat out lied to the public for the purpose of effecting the White House treasonable act against the United States. All are guilty of treason.

On April 16, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama ordered the assembled men at Fort Detrick, Maryland to provide former Secret Service agent and biological weapons expert, Marc S Griswold with a biological weapon, the A-H1N1 virus, for the purpose of effecting a viral attack against the United States and its people. Obama’s intent was to kill millions of Americans with the man made A-H1N1 virus. Another group of men and women were enlisted to spread the virus. Doctors and nurses were enlisted by Obama to infect millions of Americans with the non-contagious A-H1N1 virus using the biological weapon dispersant known as the vaccine. Another group, the WHO and the CDC were given the task to intimidate and coerce all medical practitioners to participate in the attack. Again, the media giants were paid and scripted by the United States government of Obama to terrorize the American public for the purpose of effecting the White House treasonable act against the United States people. Barack Hussein Obama is guilty of Treason for assembling a group of men and women for the purpose of effecting a deadly viral attack against the United States and it people.

Bribery

Bribery is defined as “… the receiving or offering any undue reward by or to any person whatsoever, in a public office in order to influence his behavior in office and induce him to act contrary to the known rules of honesty and integrity.” “Bribery, a common law crime, is the offering, giving, receiving or soliciting anything of value with the intent to influence the recipient’s action as a public official.” Obama’s Health Care Reform Bill was only passed because Obama, his lobbyists and administration officials bribed the US Congress and the Senate with earmarks. An earmark is a legislative provision that directs approved funds to be spent on specific projects, or that directs specific exemptions from taxes or mandated fees. In other words an earmark is a guarantee of offering of federal expenditures to particular recipients to influence his or her vote. Obama offered United States Congressmen and women and United States Senators very lucrative financial rewards in exchange for their vote to pass the unconstitutional bill. If a vote was cast for a bill that listed only Health Care expenditures the bill would never have passed. The people of the United States can’t afford the kind of Health Care Reform Obama is seeking. It doesn’t address the root cause for a need to change the health care system - astronomical over billing by the pharmaceutical industry and the corporate controlled hospitals. It only adds to the United States deficit and makes the American people more impoverished. In order to get this unwanted bill passed Obama bribed both the House and the Senate. He offered them financial rewards in the form of earmarks that amounts to $billions. The only reform needed to end the crisis was to pass a bill to make it illegal for the pharmaceutical companies and the corporate controlled hospitals to price gouge the American people. A pill that now cost $100 each would be, by legislation, reduced to a small percentage above cost price. It doesn’t take a genius to know that one pill doesn’t cost $100 to manufacture. It doesn’t take a genius to know that a unit of blood that was donated shouldn’t cost $1000 at the hospital. Obama is guilty of bribery. The US Congress is guilty of accepting a bribe. The US Senate is guilty of accepting a bribe.

High Crimes

A high crime is one which seeks the overthrow of the country, which gives aid or comfort to its enemies, or which injures the country to the profit of an individual or group. Both George W Bush and people in his administration are guilty of high crimes against the United States. He and members of his government launched a false flag attack against the United States on September 11, 2001 causing great personal loss and financial injuring to the country to the profit of the Pentagon, the CIA and the United States oil industry. The Pentagon was closing bases and canceling development and orders for new military hardware as a result of the end to the Cold War but the Operation Northwoods plan of attack against the United States on September 11, 2001 by George W Bush and the CIA injected $billions in needed new government funding into the Pentagon. CIA operations were largely scaled back as a result of the ending of the Cold War and as such they lost much of their funding from the US government. 9/11 put them back in business, first with being contracted to carry out the attacks and then later when the United States launched an unprovoked attack against Afghanistan. The attack against Afghanistan was for 2 reasons. The 1st and most immediate need was to revive the Opium drug trade which is completely now controlled by the CIA and the proceeds are used exclusively by the CIA to bankroll their illegal covert ops that include torture, rendition, kidnapping, murder, assassinations, sabotage using IEDs, illegal arms trading and illegal drug smuggling and trade. The 2nd and long term goal of the unprovoked and very illegal attack against Afghanistan was to build and control the Trans-Afghan natural gas pipeline. The individual group who petitioned the United States government to commit these high crimes was Unocal oil, who in a FEBRUARY 12, 1998 US Congressional hearing, formally asked the government of presidents Bill and Hillary Clinton to remove by military force the duly elected Taliban government of Afghanistan and install a pro-US and pro Unocol leader. On August 10, 2005, Unocal merged with Chevron Corporation (former Sectary of State Condoleezza Rice was director of Chevron from 1991 until January 15, 2001) and became a wholly owned subsidiary. Because of the financial injury that the Bush Wars of Terror caused to the United States, George W Bush and high ranking officials in his administration are guilty of High Crimes against the United States.

Misdemeanor

A misdemeanor, which in many common law legal systems, is a “lesser” criminal act. In the United States, the federal government generally considers a crime punishable with incarceration for one year or less to be a misdemeanor. Examples of misdemeanors include:

* Assault is the intentional and an unlawful threat either through words or act to cause physical harm to another individual through violence.
* Battery is intentionally touching and causing physical harm to another person against their will.
* Criminal Mischief is the act of willingly, and with malicious intent, injuring either public or private property.
* Disorderly Conduct is a very generic term and can be used to refer to, and thereby control all kinds of unruly behavior, such as being a threat to another individual and/or being a threat to private or public property.
* Disorderly Intoxication is a type of public disturbance, where it is illegal to be in a state of intoxication and thereby be a threat to other people or property.
* Falsifying any document by either a small detail or even completely, which conveying it to any form of law enforcement officer, bank or government agency is a misdemeanor.
* Indecent Exposure is the act of displaying one’s sexual organs in either a public setting or in someone else’s private premises. Breastfeeding your child is the only exception to this rule.
* Any conspiracy to violate the Federal Election Commission (FEC) Act - Barack Hussein Obama and his administration are guilty of violating FEC law - it is unlawful for any government officer to solicit or receive a donation of money, from any person; It shall be unlawful for an individual who is an officer or employee of the Federal Government, including the President, Vice President, and Members of Congress, to solicit or receive a donation of money or other thing of value in connection with a Federal, State, or local election, while in any room or building occupied in the discharge of official duties by an officer or employee of the United States, from any person. Obama and the Democrats are soliciting through email, donations of money from not just any one person but from millions of people. They are no doubt using computers and other electronic devices within the rooms of the buildings where they discharge their official duties to solicit money for the upcoming election. Obama and Democratic officials (including the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi) are soliciting, on a daily bases, money from people both inside and outside of the United States and from people who are not United States citizens. That is a gross violation of FEC law and according to the United States Constitution, an impeachable offense. Obama and the Democrats are desperate for votes and are now flagrantly violating FEC law with a special buy the vote scheme, in which people who donate only $5 or more are given a chance to win a free trip to Washington for the Dem committees’ big fund raising dinner, and get their picture taken with President Obama. In an e-mail that was sent out, Speaker Nancy Pelosi offers this extra incentive: “If you enter today, you and your guest will sit at my table should you be the lucky winner who is chosen.” That is clearly a violation of FEC law.
* Loitering,
* Prowling,
* Obstructing justice, - Hillary Clinton is famous for this by repetitively destroying documents and ordering her aids to lie to investigators about her illegal financial transactions. Barack Obama is guilty of this when he had an appointed judge classify his authorizing the CIA to assassinate US citizens as state secrets, in a secret midnight September 24, 2010 court filing.
* Petty Theft,
* Stalking another person,
* Shoplifting (within a certain limit, after which it becomes a felony),
* Soliciting or prostitution etc.

Even though they may not appear to be a threat to the National Security of the United States the U.S. Constitution forbids any government official, including the president, from serving in the United States government not only for committing Treason, Bribery or High Crimes but even if they are found guilty of committing any misdemeanor crime(s).

A pyramid scheme is a non-sustainable business model that involves promising participants payment primarily for enrolling other people into the scheme, rather than from any real investment or sale of products or services to the public. Pyramid schemes are a form of fraud.

Look at the back of any US Federal Note. Yes I didn’t say US Dollar because the US Dollar doesn’t exist. On the back, in clear view of everyone is a pyramid. The US currency was set up to fail by the bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks. They clearly and arrogantly state their true intent for the United States. They have modeled the US government finances after a pyramid scheme.

A successful pyramid scheme combines a fake yet seemingly credible business with a simple-to-understand yet sophisticated-sounding money-making formula which is used for profit. The Federal Reserve prints worthless Federal Reserve Notes and sells them to the US government, with interest. The Federal Reserve prints fake US dollars. That is to say that they print fake copies of a non existent US dollar and they swamp the word US dollar with Federal Reserve Note in order to assume credibility. Interest on a $0.00 value is always $0.00 yet through their elaborate and very illegal pyramid scheme they always make money on interest charges on a service and product that has absolutely no value.

The essential idea is that a “con artist” the Federal Reserve makes only one payment. To start earning, the Federal Reserve has to recruit others like him who will also make one payment each. The Federal Reserve gets paid out of receipts from those new recruits. They then go on to recruit others. As each new recruit makes a payment, the Federal Reserve gets a cut. They are thus promised exponential benefits as the “business” expands.

Such “businesses” seldom involve sales of real products or services to which a monetary value might be easily attached. In a pyramid scheme the “payment” itself may be a non-cash valuable. The Federal Reserve Note has $0.00 value and the service provided by the Federal Reserve Banks are illegal which makes their printing service a $0.00 value. In return for the fake and worthless illegal forgery the United States government gives the Federal Reserve Banks the peoples’ real value assets like property and precious metals like gold and silver. To enhance credibility, most such scams are well equipped with fake referrals, testimonials, and information. The United States Federal Reserve Act is such a credibility. The Act illegally gives credibility to the worthless Federal Reserve Note by declaring it legal tender for “all” trade. The Act made the United States government willing accomplices in this pyramid scheme.

The flaw is that there is no end benefit. The money simply travels up the chain. Only the originator (sometimes called the “pharaoh”) and a very few at the top levels of the pyramid make significant amounts of money. The amounts dwindle steeply down the pyramid slopes. Individuals at the bottom of the pyramid (those who subscribed to the plan, but were not able to recruit any followers themselves) end up with a deficit. This is also clearly shown on the back of the worthless forgery called the Federal Reserve Note. In the worthless forgery of the US dollar the top of the pyramid is separated intentionally from the rest of the pyramid. Only the Federal Reserve Banks make any money and they are represented by the top of the pyramid - referred to as the capstone. The capstone is not joined with the Pyramid. This is suppose to mean that the plan is not complete. Some believe that only when a New World Order is established upon all nations and a world leader is enthroned will the plan be complete. George HW Bush specifically referred to the New World Order in a speech before a Joint Session of the Congress on the Persian Gulf Crisis and the Federal Budget Deficit on September 11, 1990. “A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge;”

The Federal Reserve controlled banking system is the main pyramid scheme and the original pyramid scheme in the United States. Obama started a new pyramid scheme called the Heath Care Reform Bill. The con artist, Barack Hussein Obama, started the scheme by committing the US taxpayers to paying into the scheme with $940 billion over ten years. The $940 billion bill issued to the US taxpayers was suppose to reduce the deficit by $143 billion over the next decade ( a decade is ten years). Do you see the fraud here? Obama is saying to the American people that if they want $143 billion to pay off a debt they will pay 650% in interest or $940 billion. And you though your local bank or credit union charged too much interest on your mortgage and car loans. Which would you agree to; 7% interest on a mortgage for a house that you will eventually own or 650% interest for something that can never be paid out in full or owned. The deficit reduction is and will always be $0.00. The deficit was automatically added another $940 billion with the strokes of a pen by Barack Hussein Obama. Obama defrauded $940 billion from the US taxpayers.

To ensure the pyramid scheme succeeds Obama is forcing every single American to pay into his pyramid scheme. Under the health care pyramid scheme, by 2014 most Americans would be required to have health insurance or pay a fine. Employers are forced to provide coverage to their workers, or pay a fine of $2,000 per worker. Obama had no intention on fixing the health care problem - the out of control price gouging from the pharmaceutical industry and corporate controlled health care industry. Obama doesn’t care about the health of nation. Obama and his co-conspirators in Congress only care about the health of their secret off shore bank accounts.

Obama, Congress and the Federal Reserve bankers have robbed the people. The Federal Reserve Note pyramid scheme has now collapsed. The scheme’s debt got too big and the United States government cannot raise enough money from new taxpayers to pay the debt owed to earlier taxpayers, and as a result millions of Americans have lost their jobs, their homes and their hard earned money.

A CIA secret weapon used for assassination shoots a small poison dart to cause a heart attack, as explained in Congressional testimony in the short video above.

The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target.

The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes.

Sounds like something out of a James Bond movie? This is not fiction. This weapon actually exists and has been verified in Congressional testimony.

The astonishing information about this secret weapon of the CIA comes from U.S. Senate testimony in 1975 on rogue activities of the CIA. This weapon is only one of many James Bond-like discoveries of the Church Committee hearings, officially known as the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities.

Could this or a similar secret weapon have been used, for instance, in the recent death of 52-year-old Mark Pittman, a reporter who predicted the financial crisis and exposed Federal Reserve misdoings? Pittman, whose fight to open the Federal Reserve to more scrutiny led Bloomberg News to sue the central bank and win, died of a heart attack on Nov. 25th 2009.

How about Kenneth Lay, former CEO of ENRON, who was indicted by a grand jury on 11 counts of securities fraud and related charges. On January 31, 2006, following four and a half years of preparation by government prosecutors, Lay’s trial began in Houston. Lay was found guilty on May 25, 2006, of 10 counts against him; the judge dismissed the 11th. Because each count carried a maximum 5- to 10-year sentence, legal experts said Lay could have faced 20 to 30 years in prison. However, he died while vacationing in Snowmass, Colorado on July 5, 2006, about three and a half months before his scheduled October 23 sentencing. Preliminary autopsy reports state that he died of a heart attack caused by coronary artery disease. As a result of his death, on October 17, 2006, the federal district court judge who presided over the case vacated (makes the original judgment legally void - it never happened) Lay’s conviction.

Former president George W Bush received more money from Enron, its employees and their relatives over his political career than from any other source. The contributions supported Bush’s unsuccessful House campaign in 1978, his two campaigns for Texas governor, renovation of his governor’ s office, his presidential race, his inaugurations and his presidential recount fund. Enron has given more than $700,000 to Mr. Bush since 1993. In addition, Enron’s chairman, Kenneth L. Lay, was one of the “pioneers,” raising more than $100,000 for Mr. Bush’s e-mail campaign, and he and his wife gave a total of $10,000 to Mr. Bush’s Florida recount fund. Enron and Mr. Lay also contributed a total of $200,000 to Mr. Bush’s inaugural festivities. ~ The New York Times

How about Tim Russert, a leading U.S. political correspondent and host of the NBC television network’s long-running “Meet the Press” talk show, who also died of a heart attack. He was only 58. Russert became a news subject himself in 2007, when he provided key testimony at the CIA leak trial of Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff, Lewis “Scooter” Libby.

Libby was charged with lying and obstructing a federal investigation into the leaking CIA operative Valerie Plame’s identity after her husband criticized the Bush administration.

Libby said he had learned of Plame’s secret identity from Russert. But Russert testified he did not discuss Plame with Libby and offered the jury an account sharply at odds with Libby’s recorded testimony.

Scooter Libby, was ultimately convicted for perjury in the leaking of CIA agents Valerie Plume and her husband. Libby was reported to have made a deal but never had the opportunity to name names because in 2008, Scooter was beaten to death with a barbell by his cell mate, Jeffrey Dahmer.

Lyndon Baines Johnson, 36th President of the United States, died of an apparent heart attack on January 22, 1973, less than one week before the Vietnam peace agreement was signed. Two days before Mr. Johnson’s death, Richard M. Nixon, the Republican who was elected in 1968, took the oath of office for his second term as President.

John Edgar Hoover, the first Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of the United States also died in office (under Richard Nixon - 37th President of the United States January 20, 1969 – August 9, 1974) of an apparent heart attack. Hoover was appointed director of the Bureau of Investigation—predecessor to the FBI—in 1924, he was instrumental in founding the FBI in 1935, where he remained director until his death in 1972. Presidents Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, and Lyndon B. Johnson each considered dismissing Hoover as FBI Director, but all of them ultimately concluded that the political cost of doing so would be too great. Hoover maintained strong support in Congress until his death in 1972 from an apparent heart attack (reported the day after as the effects of high blood pressure.) Operational command of the Bureau passed to Associate Director Clyde Tolson. Soon thereafter, President Richard Nixon appointed L. Patrick Gray, a Justice Department official with no FBI experience, as Acting Director, with W. Mark Felt remaining as Associate Director. In January 1998 a university professor of forensic science, suspecting foul play in J. Edgar Hoover’s death, was granted access to the District of Columbia medical examiner’s records to reinvestigate how the former FBI director died. George Washington University Professor James Starrs believes the records may clarify the circumstances around Hoover’s 1972 death at age 77, which was attributed officially to a heart attack. No autopsy was performed. Starrs says nothing in Hoover’s medical history would suggest he was a candidate for a heart attack. Without an autopsy, other causes of death are still open, he said. “Everything thus far indicates there was nothing of sufficient medical history to write this off as a heart attack,” Starrs said in a telephone interview. “Hoover had numerous enemies from all walks of life; the man’s life was marked for death by all kinds of people.” One theory suggests that burglars on the Hoover premises might have poisoned him, which could have triggered a heart attack, Starrs said. Why was Hover assassinated by heart attack? “The main suggestion was that it was part of the Watergate scene in the ’70s,” Starrs said.

Slobodan Milo¨ević was President of Serbia and of Yugoslavia. He served as the President of Socialist Republic of Serbia and Republic of Serbia from 1989 until 1997 in three terms and as President of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia from 1997 to 2000. He also led the Socialist Party of Serbia from its foundation in 1990. In the midst of the Clinton bombing of Serbia, Milo¨ević was charged with crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), but the trial ended after Milo¨ević died in his cell. Milosevic’s trial came to an abrupt halt on the morning of 11 March 2006 when he was found dead in his cell. He had reportedly died in his bed from an apparent heart failure. The International Criminal Tribunal declared that there were no suspicious circumstances and therefore no autopsy was performed. His trial was officially terminated just 3 days later on 14 March 2006. After 467 days of sittings it ended without a verdict. Before his death his lawyers were going to call Bill Clinton and Madeline Albright as witnesses to his defense. The trial was expected to run until 2012.

$50 billion Ponzi Schemer Bernie Madoff’s partner in crime, Jeffrey Picower also allegedly died of a heart attack. He drowned in his swimming pool on his multi-million dollar ocean front mansion in Florida after suffering a heart attack. He was scheduled to appear in court just a couple of days before he’s found dead. The article in the New York Post stated he was being forced to go before a judge and provide an explanation to what he did with his clients billions.

The most recent case of assassination by heart attack occurred on Aug. 8, 2010. Prominent oil investor Matt Simmons was reported to have died of a heart attack at his home in North Haven, Maine. The famed energy banker was a prominent proponent of peak oil theory, and most recently got attention for his dire calls about the fate of the Gulf of Mexico. He was very critical of BP Oil in regards to the effect of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. He claimed it would be cataclysmic. Simmons’ dire warnings on the upcoming commodity and fuel shortages that is set to hit the United States, died at the age of 67. Matt Simmons, had been gaining recent popularity over the last several months as a whistle-blower with his accusations against the British Petroleum Company ( BP ), who is responsible for defacing and vandalizing the Gulf of Mexico while hiding the truth from the general public. According to Corporate owned media reports, he drowned in his hot tub at his summer home in Maine. Followed by a later report from the Medical Examiner that concludes ” Simmons was suffering from heart disease ” which might have been a contributing factor in his death.

Watch the one-minute video above for the description of a former CIA secretary and Congressional testimony on this secret assassination weapon which caused heart attacks.

The above video is from a revealing 45-minute documentary. In this riveting exposé, five former CIA agents describe how their initial pride and enthusiasm at serving their nation turned to anguish and remorse, as they realized that they were actually subverting democracy and killing innocent civilians all in the name “national security” and promoting foreign policy agendas.

The above-mentioned testimony is from 1975, well over 30 years ago. With the ensuing leaps in technological capability, just imagine what kinds of secret weapons for assassination have been developed since. There is good evidence that technology has even been developed to cause cancer and suicidal feelings in a person.

Undetectable poisons used to murder by heart attack

The easiest manner in which to kill someone and leave no trace of the obvious crime having been committed, would be to cause a heart attack by using chemical substances that break down as naturally occurring compounds that would be normally found in anyone’s body. The process is relatively simple to anyone with knowledge of medicine and procedures involving those medicines. You’ve heard of tranquilizer darts? Tranquilizer darts are filled with a tranquilizer drug that, when injected, temporarily sedate the animal so that it may be handled (or captured) safely. The tranquilizer can be a sedative, anaesthetic, paralytic agent or in the case of the CIA - chemical compound to create a heart attack and death.

In a CIA assassination training manual for would-be killers called “A Study of Assassination,” the CIA specifically list the use of drugs to covertly assassinate a person.

3. Drugs.

If the subject drinks heavily, morphine or a similar narcotic can be injected at the passing out stage, and the cause of death will often be held to be acute alcoholism.

The following two chemical compounds have been used to create a heart attack, while leaving no trace of a crime:

Potassium Chloride:

Potassium Chloride is known to be among the ingredients in many prescription drugs, such as: Klor-Con, Klor-Con 8, Klor-Con 10, and Klor-Con/25, among others. Potassium Chloride breaks down into both its’ individual components, potassium and chlorine. Both are found in the human body and the presence of either or both of these will not raise suspicion by either the attending physician or the coroner, who will carry out the autopsy.

This compound breaks down into both potassium and chlorine, in which the chlorine (Cl) binds with the human body’s naturally occurring sodium (Na) to create NaCl — sodium chloride — common table salt. The resultant heart attack is found to have no known cause — as all that is found in the body is a slightly elevated level of NaCl. Too much potassium in the body causes tachycardia (fast heart-rate), which then leads to something known as ventricular fibrillation, which is one of many types of cardiac arrest.

Calcium Gluconate:

Calcium Gluconate is available in a 10% hypertonic I.V. (intravenous) solution, which simply means that the concentration is higher than what normally appears in the human body. The process by which this works is known as osmosis — the hypertonic solution removes the water and glucose from the body’s cells — replacing it with Calcium Gluconate. The calcium and the glucose are deposited in the body to be used as energy/fuel. The glucose is used for fuel, while the calcium remains in the body.

The Calcium Gluconate removes chlorine and replaces it with calcium, thus creating an electrolytic imbalance. The three compounds that become imbalanced are sodium (Na), potassium (K), and chlorine (Cl). This interferes with the normal LUB-DUB heartbeat impulse, which can then be regulated either too fast or too slow, creating a heart attack.

Air Embolism:

This is a third completely undetectable manner by which to murder someone by forced heart attack. A direct injection of 60 ml of air in a syringe (or dart) into any vein causes the chambers of the heart to fill with air, which causes a heart attack. This type of heart attack is known as a P.E.A., or Pulseless Electrical Activity, and is another form of cardiac arrest. The first known incidence where an air embolism was used to murder someone was regarding Abbie Borroto, from New Hampshire, who died in 1950 from a 40cc air injection. She died within minutes of being injected with 40cc of air. Dr H Sander was charged and tried for the murder but was he was found not guilty to murder on the grounds that the patient may already have been dead when he gave the injection.

In all of the above methods to create a heart attack a needle mark is left on the skin. However, with a little creativity, an injection in an usual body location will help conceal the crime. If a small enough gauge needle is used for the dart, the associated needle mark would be barely noticeable. If the coroner is not as careful as he or she should be - the tiny needle mark would avoid detection. A tuberculin needle, or an insulin needle are the needles of choice as they leave the tiniest of needle marks.

Just remember that the CIA engages in covert activities at the request of the President of the United States of America. The Central Intelligence Agency was created in 1947 with the signing of the National Security Act by President Harry S. Truman. The act also created a Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) to serve as head of the United States intelligence community; act as the principal adviser to the President for intelligence matters related to the national security; and serve as head of the Central Intelligence Agency.

The CIA official website states: “Performing such other functions and duties related to intelligence affecting the national security as the President or the Director of National Intelligence may direct.” The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 amended the National Security Act to provide for a Director of National Intelligence who would assume some of the roles formerly fulfilled by the DCI, with a separate Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

There are three basic aluminum salts used in vaccines: aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate and potassium-aluminum sulfate, or alum. The three forms are not interchangeable as they each have their own chemical properties.

A new disease has been identified, first in France, called macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF). The condition manifests with spread out muscle pain and chronic fatigue. One third of the patients develop an autoimmune disease, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease). Even if they don’t have an obvious autoimmune disease, most of them are part of a subgroup called HLADRB1*01 that puts them at risk of developing polymyalgia rheumatica and rheumatoid arthritis.

Doctors have identified that the aluminum-hydroxide in the vaccines stays at the site of the injection for years. The whole time it is there, it is stimulating an immune response. Which is exactly why the vaccine makers include it in the vaccine, so that the immune system will react more strongly to the virus or toxoid. But switching the immune system on without turning it off is not good for the body. This appears to be what causes the chronic fatigue seen in MMF.

In studies they were able to reproduce the MMF lesions in rats, and concluded that they were caused by the aluminum-hydroxide in the vaccines, and the ongoing local immune reaction. The vaccines in question for this particular study were hepatitis B, hepatitis A and tetanus - all linked to the WHO infecting mankind with the AIDS virus.

The reason MMF was first discovered in France is because when they do a muscle biopsy, they do it on the deltoid muscle of the arm, where the vaccines are injected. In the United States, biopsies are done on the calf.

In another study of 92 MMF patients, eight had a demyelinating central nervous system disorder. The myelin sheath is the protective covering that surrounds and insulates nerves. When myelin is damaged, the nerves eventually become damaged, leading to disrupted transmission of signals within the nervous system. The MS diagnosis was definite in five out of seven cases, and probable in two out of seven. Based on the association with MMF and MS disorders they suggested that deltoid muscle biopsies be done in cases of MS to look for MMF.

MMF has now been identified in children, and was characterized by motor delay, hypotonia (diminished muscle tone), and failure to thrive. They concluded that MMF should be considered in the evaluation of children with failure to thrive, diminished muscle tone, and muscle weakness.

Science proved that the anthrax vaccine is the cause of Gulf War illness (GWI). ALS and other neurological disorders are associated with some cases of GWI. There were numerous studies done that looked at the effect aluminum-hydroxide and squalene had on GWI, both being adjuvants in the anthrax vaccine. Adjuvants are agents that increase a specific immune response to an antigen.

Young male mice were injected with either aluminum hydroxide or squalene, or a combination of aluminum-hydroxide and squalene. Motor and cognitive-behavioral tests were performed on the mice when they were alive, and after euthanasia they examined the central nervous system tissues for evidence of inflammation and cell death.

The mice that received the aluminum showed motor deficits that were seen by decreased strength. They also found apoptotic neurons, which means suicidal neurons, or neurons that are destroying themselves (225%), and neuron loss (35%) in the lumbar spinal cord.

Aluminum hydroxide is an adjuvant used in the following vaccines: DTaP, BioThrax, DPT, Engerix-B, Gardasil, Havrix, LYMErix, Prevnar, Rabies Vaccine Adsorbed, Recombivax, and Tripedia.

Science has proven that the following conditions are all linked to the aluminum-hydroxide in vaccines: Chronic fatigue, Multiple sclerosis (MS) , Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS), Demyelinating central nervous system disorders, Plymyalgia rheumatica and rheumatoid arthritis, Motor delay, Hypotonia or diminished muscle tone, Failure to thrive, Apoptic neurons, which are self-destructing neurons in the lumbar spinal cord, Neuron loss in the lumbar spinal cord.

The Washington Post’s Dana Priest first revealed back in January that the Obama administration had compiled a hit list of American citizens targeted for assassination, she wrote that “as of several months ago, the CIA list included three U.S. citizens.” In April, both the Post and the NYT confirmed that the Obama administration had specifically authorized the assassination of U.S. citizens. The CIA, under orders of the president are now authorized to murder U.S. citizens. The U.S. people have been stripped of their inalienable right of due process by the De facto president, Barack Hussein Obama. The CIA has been ordered by Barack Obama to murder U.S. citizens on U.S. soil. Obama sees Americans as enemies of his government. Americans are now enemy combatants. Obama has told the World that he will murder anyone who goes against him, his government and his government’s political agenda, both in the U.S. and throughout the World.

Nobody disputes the right of the U.S. or any other country to kill someone on the battlefield during war without due process. That’s just obvious, but that’s not remotely what this targeted assassination program is about. The entire world has been made a “battlefield” by Barack Obama. Targeting American citizens for assassination, who are far away from a “battlefield” is odious and tyrannical.

The U.S. tried to import this same anti-due process policy in Afghanistan. There, the U.S. last year compiled a “hit list” of 50 Afghan citizens whose assassination it authorized on the alleged ground that they were drug “kingpins” or funding the Talbian. The president simply accused 50 Afghan citizens of crimes and ordered their assassination. No evidence is ever offered or even sought and the victims of these unlawful assassinations are never charged or convicted. Obama has assumed dictatorial powers. As a dictator he is now claiming to be ruler, judge and juror.

Democrats engaged in mass protests when George W Bush and Dick Cheney merely wanted to eavesdrop on and detain Americans without any judicial oversight or due process. Yet here is Barack Obama actually authorizing the CIA to do far worse crimes against the United States people than that, without any due process or judicial oversight. Obama is targeting United States citizens for assassination — and there is barely a peep of protest from the same Party that spent years depicting “mere” warrantless eavesdropping and due-process-free detention to be the acts of a savage, lawless tyrant.

Obama himself in December 2008 joined in condemnation of Bush seeking to detain Americans without any judicial oversight or due process. Charlie Savage of The Boston Globe questioned Obama , regarding his views of executive power:

5. Does the Constitution permit a president to detain US citizens without charges as unlawful enemy combatants?

[Obama]: No. I reject the Bush Administration’s claim that the President has plenary authority under the Constitution to detain U.S. citizens without charges as unlawful enemy combatants.

While campaigning for the highest office of the United States government, Obama said the President lacks the power merely to detain U.S. citizens without charges. Yet now, as President, he claims he has the power to assassinate them without charges. Well, Mr. Obama, according to U.S. civil law, according to U.S. military law and according to International law, you don’t.

The Uniformed Code of Military Justice states:

(c) Before a vote is taken on the findings, the military judge or the president of a court-martial without a military judge shall, in the presence of the accused and counsel, instruct the members of the court as to the elements of the offense and charge them -

(1) that the accused must be presumed to be innocent until his guilt is established by legal and competent evidence beyond reasonable doubt;

(2) that in the case being considered, if there is a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the accused, the doubt must be resolved in favor of the accused and he must be acquitted;

(3) that, if there is a reasonable doubt as to the degree of guilt, the finding must be in a lower degree as to which there is no reasonable doubt; and

(4) that the burden of proof to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt is upon the United States.

If you go off with the intent to to kill Americans, how do you prove that they are really guilty in terms of legal process? You can’t. Barack Hussein Obama is guilty of War Crimes - Torture, Cruel or Inhuman Treatment, and Murder of Americans and foreign nationals. Barack Hussein Obama is guilty of unlawfully authorizing torture, cruel and human treatment and murder, not only according to International Law but according to U.S. Law.

U.S. Code
§ 2441. War crimes

(a) Offense.— Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.
(b) Circumstances.— The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such war crime or the victim of such war crime is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act).

(d) Common Article 3 Violations.—

(1) Prohibited conduct.— In subsection (c)(3), the term “grave breach of common Article 3” means any conduct (such conduct constituting a grave breach of common Article 3 of the international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949), as follows:

(A) Torture.— The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering upon another person within his custody or physical control for the purpose of obtaining information or a confession, punishment, intimidation, coercion, or any reason based on discrimination of any kind.

(B) Cruel or inhuman treatment.— The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act intended to inflict severe or serious physical or mental pain or suffering, including serious physical abuse, upon another within his custody or control.

(D) Murder.— The act of a person who intentionally kills, or conspires or attempts to kill, or kills whether intentionally or unintentionally in the course of committing any other offense under this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause.

The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of the Council of Europe states (art. 6.2): “Everyone charged with a criminal offense shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law”. This convention has been adopted by treaty and is binding on all Council of Europe members.

In Canada, section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states: “Any person charged with an offense has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal”.

In France, article 9 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, of constitutional value, says “Everyone is supposed innocent until having been declared guilty.” and the preliminary article of the code of criminal procedure says “any suspected or prosecuted person is presumed to be innocent until their guilt has been established”. The jurors’ oath reiterates this assertion.

The Constitution of Russia, in article 49, states that “Everyone charged with a crime shall be considered not guilty until his or her guilt has been proven in conformity with the federal law and has been established by the valid sentense of a court of law”. It also states that “The defendant shall not be obliged to prove his or her innocence” and “Any reasonable doubt shall be interpreted in favor of the defendant”.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 11, states: Everyone charged with a penal offense has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which they have had all the guarantees necessary for their defense.

John Adams : “The right of a nation to kill a tyrant, in cases of necessity, can no more be doubted, than to hang a robber, or kill a flea. But killing one tyrant only makes way for worse, unless the people have sense, spirit and honesty enough to establish and support a constitution guarded at all points against the tyranny of the one, the few, and the many. Let it be the study, therefore, of lawgivers and philosophers, to enlighten the people’s understandings and improve their morals, by good and general education; to enable them to comprehend the scheme of government, and to know upon what points their liberties depend; to dissipate those vulgar prejudices and popular superstitions that oppose themselves to good government; and to teach them that obedience to the laws is as indispensable in them as in lords and kings.”

Gandhi: “They may torture my body, break my bones, even kill me, then they will have my dead body. NOT MY OBEDIENCE!”

Albert Einstein: “It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.”

Most people know that the Associated Press (AP) is one of the largest, internationally recognized, syndicated news services. In one report the AP published a report whereby they clearly stated that Barack Obama, a US Senator hopeful, was Kenyan born. When Obama was interviewed later he confirmed that he was indeed Kenyan born, not a natural born American.

In a syndicated AP report, published Sunday, June 27, 2004, by the Kenyan Standard Times, archived report available at http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm, an AP reporter stated the following:

Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate
Sunday Standard, Nairobi-Kenya
Sunday, June 27, 2004

Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

As recently as Thursday, spokesmen for the Ryan campaign still insisted that Ryan would remain in the race. Ryan had defended himself saying, “There’s no breaking of any laws. There’s no breaking of any marriage laws. There’s no breaking of the Ten Commandments anywhere.”

In October of 2004, during the ABC Chicago Affiliate’s broadcast of the Obama-Keyes debates, Obama openly admitted that he was not a natural born citizen. (C-Span aired the uncut version of the debates, which contained this exchange, in the second half of April, 2005) In this debate, between Obama and Keyes, Keyes faulted Obama for not being a “natural born citizen”, Obama replied, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency”, self-admitted that he was not eligible for the

Seeing that an AP reporter is too professional to submit a story which was not based on confirmed sources (ostensibly the Obama campaign in this case), the inference seems inescapable: Obama himself was putting out in 2004, that he was born in Kenya.

This AP story, was syndicated world-wide, so you should be able to find it in major newspapers, archived in libraries world-wide.

Sentinel Blog Radio broke the public news of the existence of this AP story on October 14, 2009. However, a professional investigator had uncovered this story months ago, and that certified and authenticated copies of this report, meeting Federal Rules of evidence, have already been prepared and archived at many locations nationwide. It should be noted that on January 8, 2006, the Honolulu Advertiser also reported that Barack Hussein Obama was born outside the United States.

So What?

If you’re going to be involved in government in the United States, citizenship is a must. To be a Senator or Representative, you must be a citizen of the United States. To be President, not only must you be a citizen, but you must also be natural-born.

Article Two of the United States Constitution

Clause 5: Qualifications for office

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Can’t find this admission?

If you are looking for this admission in the Obama-Keyes debates by Obama you may not find it. An edited version of the debate - as requested by Obama is what you will find. C-Span did rebroadcast the Alan Keyes vs. Barack Obama debates, unedited in April of 2005. In the introduction to the unedited rebroadcast of the debates, the C-Span host noted that C-Span had decided to air them because of the growing interest in Washington, D.C., in Barack Obama. He also pointed out that C-Span was not airing the version seen in Chicago the previous fall, and which Keyes was to distribute in diverse media on his website; that C-Span had requested from the TV station in Chicago the unedited tapes of the debate, and that only on C-Span would they be aired.

At one point in the unedited second debate, Keyes, accused Obama saying, “You are not even a natural born citizen!” To which Obama immediately replied, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency.”

At the end of the airing of the second debate, the C-Span host noted, as he read from a single sheet of paper, placed before him, that the Obama Campaign had contacted them and requested them to point out to their viewers that Obama’s response here should not be understood as a denial that he is a natural born citizen, only that Keyes’ accusation had nothing to do with the qualifications of office of a U.S. Senator.

Prior to 1972 Hawaii allowed the birth in another State or another country to be registered in Hawaii.

In Hawaii, a Certificate of Live Birth resulting from hospital documentation, including a signature of an attending physician, is different from a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth. For births prior to 1972, a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth was the result of the uncorroborated testimony of one witness and was not generated by a hospital. Such a Certificate could be obtained up to one year from the date of the child’s birth. For that reason, its value as prima facie evidence is limited and could be overcome if any of the allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be obtained. The vault (long Version) birth certificate, per Hawaiian Statute 883.176 allows the birth in another State or another country to be registered in Hawaii. Box 7C of the vault Certificate of Live Birth contains a question, whether the birth was in Hawaii or another State or Country. Therefore, the only way to verify the exact location of birth is to review a certified copy or the original vault Certificate of Live Birth and compare the name of the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor against the birthing records on file at the hospital noted on the Certificate of the Live Birth.

Lawyers for Obama and judges presiding over the Obama ineligibility law suits have falsely claimed that Hawaii Statute 338-17.8 didn’t exist until 1982. What they failed to make public is information concerning revisions to an existing statue. Most Hawaii statutes were revised to change “TERRITORY OF HAWAII” to “TERRITORY AND STATE OF HAWAII.” It was required when Hawaii became the newest of the 50 U.S. states on August 21, 1959. A revision of Hawaii Statute 338-17.8 was only done in 1982. It’s a revision of the statute, not a brand new statute.

Hawaiian Statute
§338-17.8 - Certificates for children born out of State.

(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.

(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birthcertificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.

(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91.

Obama’s can you “Spare Change Campaign”

When Obama was campaigning for the presidency of the United States the main campaign slogan was “CHANGE”. We now know his slogan is missing a word. That single word would have changed the entire outcome of the elections. That word accurately describes his ongoing campaign of change. Even now that he is De facto president of the United States that single word is still purposely omitted. That word is “SPARE”. Everything that Obama has done since being inaugurated as president has revolved on asking the people of the United States to fork over more and more of their hard earned money. In every email that Obama or members of his administration sends out there is always a request for the people to send more money. Obama puts evangelists to shame when it comes to asking for money. Like the evangelists Obama and his team are constantly asking for the people to send him whatever spare change they have. Every bill passed since his inauguration has taken more and more money from the pockets of the already cash strapped U.S. citizens. In the US there are laws governing bill collectors and unwanted solicitation. The laws should be applied to Obama - the king of scams.

FEC law - unlawful for any government officer to solicit or receive a donation of money, from any person;

It shall be unlawful for an individual who is an officer or employee of the Federal Government, including the President, Vice President, and Members of Congress, to solicit or receive a donation of money or other thing of value in connection with a Federal, State, or local election, while in any room or building occupied in the discharge of official duties by an officer or employee of the United States, from any person.

Just one of many emails soliciting donation of money, from the office of the United States White House

From: Barack Obama <democraticparty@democrats.org>
To: Paul Kincaid <editorial@nbgazette.com>
Wed, 21 Jul 2010

Paul –

When you and I set out on this journey three years ago, we knew that ours would be a lengthy struggle to build a new foundation for this country — one that would require squaring off against the special interests who had spent decades stacking the deck in their favor.

President Barack Obama

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010
From: “Jen O’Malley Dillon, Democrats.org” <democraticparty@democrats.org>
To: Paul Kincaid <editorial@nbgazette.com>

Paul –

Months before the 2010 election, John Boehner — the Republican leader in the House — is launching a full-fledged campaign operation to become the next Speaker of the House. And he’s counting on contributions from lobbyists to help pay the bills.

Thanks,

Jen

Jen O’Malley Dillon
Executive Director
Democratic National Committee

Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010
From: Tim Kaine <democraticparty@democrats.org>
To: Paul Kincaid <editorial@nbgazette.com>

Paul –

Thanks,

Governor Tim Kaine
Chairman

The Complete List of Obama Statement Expiration Dates can be found here: http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/4701/long-post-complete-list-obama-statement-expiration-dates

The hijackings of US Commercial airlines by agents of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirate and Egypt turned logic and rationality completely upside down. Before 9/11 the United States retaliated against the country or countries that attacked and killed any number of its people but after September 11, 2001 the US defied logic and rationality by attacking 2 innocent countries in retaliation for the attacks that evidence declares was financed by, recruited for by, trained by and executed by citizens of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirate and Egypt. The alleged 9/11 mastermind bin Laden is a billionaire Saudi with very close ties with the Saudi royal family. Today instead of the US rightfully retaliating against Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirate and Egypt for the hijackings and killing of some 3000 US citizens the US made war of aggression plans to attack and occupy Afghanistan and Iraq, neither having anything to do with 9/11.

On Saturday January 30, 2010 it was disclosed that the Obama administration is quietly working with Saudi Arabia (the country with the majority of 9/11 hijackers) and other Persian Gulf allies to speed up arms sales and rapidly upgrade defenses for US military seized oil terminals and other key infrastructure in Iraq and Afghanistan. The U.S. plans to triple the size of a 10,000-man protection force in Saudi Arabia, as part of a broader push that includes unprecedented coordination of air defenses and a future war of aggression between the U.S. and Arab militaries against Iran.

The military build up is an expansion of the George W. Bush war crimes administration to sell warplanes and missile systems to friendly Arab states to help the US prepare for a planned attack against Iran. The 9/11 attacking countries, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia are leading a region-wide military buildup that has resulted in more than $25 billion in U.S. arms purchases in the past two years alone.

Evidence intentionally ignored by the 9/11 Commission

Number of hijackers from Iraq on 9/11 = 0
Number of hijackers from Afghanistan on 9/11 = 0
Number of Taliban involved in 9/11 = 0
Number of Middle East attacks against the US = 0
Number of US civilians killed by Iraqi military = 0
Number of US civilians killed by Afghan military = 0
Number of US civilians killed by the Taliban = 0
Number of US civilians killed by Saddam Hussein = 0
Number of US civilians killed by Iran = 0
Number of Iraqi bombers used in 9/11 attacks = 0
Number of Afghan bombers used in 9/11 attacks = 0
Number of US citizens killed by bin Laden on 9/11 = 0 - When the US FBI was asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Since September 11, 2001

Number of Iraqi civilians killed by US = 1,000,000 +
Number of Afghan civilians killed by US = 34,000 + civilians
Number of Afghan resistance fighters killed by the US and NATO forces = 30,000 +
Number of US citizens killed by Bush / Cheney and their administration on 9/11 = 3000+
Number of US Soldiers killed since 9/11 by Bush / Cheney and their administration and the Obama administration = 4400+ in Iraq war and 1,100 + in Afghanistan war.
Number of foreign military war planes used in the attacks of September 11, 2001? The correct answer is 0.

What is the nationality of the accused mastermind of 9/11? The correct answer is Saudi Arabia.

How many hijackers were from Saudi Arabia? The correct answer is fifteen of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon.

Did the US attack the country that had the mastermind and the majority of hijackers that took part in attacks of September 11, 2001? The correct answer is no.

The evidence is overwhelming that Saudi Arabia was the country that planned for and executed the attacks yet even today the US is arming the countries that attacked the United States of America on September 11, 2001.

The Afghan and Iraqi people are not terrorists. They are resisting the unprovoked attacks by the US and NATO troops. They are resisting the US and NATO forces who have attacked their country, destroyed their homes and businesses and slaughtered their people. Your government has inhumanly tortured hundreds, perhaps thousands of innocent people whose only crime is defending their country and fellow countrymen from the unlawful war of aggression and occupation of their country by the United States and NATO countries.

“You may fool all the people some of the time, you can even fool some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all the time.” ~ Abraham Lincoln

Terrorists or Patriotic Freedom Fighters?

No matter where you go in the World each country has the same duty to protect their country and people from an armed attack from a foreign country. Each and every country have the exact same military code of conduct that bounds their citizens to the duty to defend themselves at all costs, including giving up your life in resistance to an attack and occupation. The United States Army Code of Conduct is duplicated around the World. Read the United States Code of Conduct and substitute the United States with countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Russia, China, Canada or any other country. The duty to fight and guard ones country and way of life is the same in every country in the World. Duty bound to not surrender, to fight on until you are dead, to command others to fight and resist, to be silent when captured is universal because you do so to defend your freedom and your right for you and your countrymen to be free from unlawful attacks and occupations by a foreign military force. The Afghan and Iraqi people are duty bound and have every legal right to defend themselves and their country from the unlawful US attack and occupation of their country. They are not terrorists or the enemy - the US, Canada and other participating NATO countries are the terrorists and the enemy.

“Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” ~ Abraham Lincoln November 19, 1863

If Canada, England or France was attacked by a foreign country, the people of those countries would immediately organize a resistance movement to drive out the attacking military forces. Resistance is the logical and most patriotic duty and action that any citizen can take up when faced with a foreign military occupation of their country. Those who resist attacks and occupation are the ultimate heroes. Taking up arms to defend your country and fellow countrymen is courageous and honorable. Iraqi and Afghanistan citizens are not terrorists they are their country’s heroes - defending their country and countrymen from the unlawful US attacks and occupation. US propaganda labels the resistance as terrorists. US propaganda is used because if the US people realized that the Iraqi and Afghan people are the innocent victims of the Bush administration greed for oil the US would not be in either Iraq or Afghanistan. The US people don’t realize that it is solely the blame of the Bush administration and the Obama administration for the inevitable collapse of the US. The unlawful, unprovoked and unjustified wars of aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan is bankrupting the US.

Let every American, every lover of liberty, every well wisher to his posterity, swear by the blood of the Revolution, never to violate in the least particular, the laws of the country; and never to tolerate their violation by others. ~ Abraham Lincoln January 27, 1838

John McCain: “… after we were able to help the Afghan freedom fighters and drive the Russians out of Afghanistan, we basically washed our hands of the region. Those “freedom fighters” were of course the mujaheddin in Afghanistan waging jihad against the Soviets, including one Osama bin Laden and one Zayman Al Zawahiri. We backed and funded them … we certainly supported the factions fighting alongside him, factions every bit as militantly Islamic as bin Laden–as even the State Department concedes.”

FBI implicates Saudi Arabia for 9/11

On September 27, 2001 the FBI issued a Press Release naming the alleged hijackers of September 11, 2001. Nowhere does it name any Afghanistan (including the Taliban) or Iraqi national. 9/11 was not an act of war. It was a criminal act. It was an attack that launched the US agenda in the Middle East. Evidence already in possession by the US own FBI implicates Saudi Arabia for the attacks, as the majority of hijackers and the alleged mastermind were all Saudi nationals. Because of this evidence the US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are illegal, as they are both wars of aggression. Anyone who has participated in and continues to participate in these unlawful wars are war criminals.

FBI Press Release

AMERICAN AIRLINES #77
BOEING 757

1) Khalid Almihdhar - Saudi national
2) Majed Moqed - Saudi national
3) Nawaf Alhazmi - Saudi national
4) Salem Alhazmi - Saudi national
5) Hani Hanjour - resident of Phoenix, Arizona, and San Diego, California

AMERICAN AIRLINES #11
BOEING 767

1) Satam M.A. Al Suqami- Saudi national
2) Waleed M. Alshehri - Saudi national - a pilot
3) Wail M. Alshehri - residence(s): Hollywood, Florida; Newton, Massachusetts -Believed to be a pilot
4) Mohamed Atta - Egyptian national - a pilot
5) Abdulaziz Alomari - Saudi national - a pilot

UNITED AIRLINES #175
BOEING 767

1) Marwan Al-Shehhi -Possible residence(s): Hollywood, Florida - a pilot
2) Fayez Rashid Ahmed Hassan Al Qadi Banihammad - residence(s): Delray Beach, Florida
3) Ahmed Alghamdi
4) Hamza Alghamdi - residence(s): Delray Beach, Florida
5) Mohand Alshehri - residence(s): Delray Beach, Florida

UNITED AIRLINES #93
BOEING 757

1) Saeed Alghamdi - residence: Delray Beach, Florida
2) Ahmed Ibrahim A. Al Haznawi - Saudi national
3) Ahmed Alnami - residence: Delray Beach, Florida
4) Ziad Samir Jarrah - a pilot

Alleged Mastermind of the 9/11 attacks
USAMA BIN LADEN - Saudi Arabian

The FBI released 19 photographs of individuals believed to be the hijackers (none were foreign soldiers, airmen or navy crewmen) of the four airliners that crashed on September 11, 01

“Don’t interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these great and true principles.” ~ Abraham Lincoln August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Brooklyn Eagle - July 10, 1932

“I have harnessed the cosmic rays and caused them to operate a motive device. … I have advanced a theory of the cosmic rays and at every step of my investigations I have found it completely justified. The attractive features of the cosmic rays is their constancy. They shower down on us throughout the whole 24 hours, and if a [power] plant is developed to use their power it will not require devices for storing energy as would be necessary with devices using wind, tide or sunlight. All of my investigations seem to point to the conclusion that they are small particles, each carrying so small a charge that we are justified in calling them neutrons. They move with great velocity, exceeding that of light. More than 25 years ago I began my efforts to harness the cosmic rays and I can now state that I have succeeded in operating a motive device by means of them. I will tell you in the most general way, the cosmic ray ionizes the air, setting free many charged ions and electrons. These charges are captured in a condenser [capacitor] which is made to discharge through the circuit of the motor. I have hopes of building my motor on a large scale, but circumstances have not been favorable to carrying out my plan.” ~ Nikola Tesla states:

Further development of harnessing the cosmic rays to power motors was stopped by J. P. Morgan - an American financier, banker and art collector who dominated corporate finance and industrial consolidation during his time. In 1892 Morgan arranged the merger of Edison General Electric and Thomson-Houston Electric Company to form General Electric. After financing the creation of the Federal Steel Company he merged the Carnegie Steel Company and several other steel and iron businesses to form the United States Steel Corporation in 1901.

J.P. Morgan kills Tesla’s free-energy development

In 1900, Morgan financed inventor Nikola Tesla and his Wardenclyffe Tower with $150,000 for experiments in radio. However, in 1903, when the tower structure was near completion, J. P. Morgan threw a wrench in the project’s completion when Morgan wanted to know “Where can I put the meter?” Tesla had no answer. Tesla’s vision of free power did not agree with Morgan’s corporate view; nor would it pay for the maintenance of the transmission system. Construction costs eventually exceeded the money provided by Morgan, and additional financiers were reluctant to come forth. By July 1904, Morgan (and the other investors) finally decided they would not provide any additional financing. Morgan also advised other investors to avoid the project.

J. P. Morgan enslaves the U.S. people

The Panic of 1907 (a carbon copy of today’s financial crisis that started in 2007 - 100 years later and involving the very same banks - coincidence?? ) was a financial crisis that almost crippled the American economy. Major New York banks were on the verge of bankruptcy and there was no mechanism to rescue them until Morgan stepped in personally and took charge.

Treasury Secretary George B. Cortelyou earmarked $35 million of federal money to quell the storm but had no easy way to use it. Morgan now took personal charge, meeting with the nation’s leading financiers in his New York mansion; he forced them to devise a plan to meet the crisis. James Stillman, president of the National City Bank, also played a central role. Morgan organized a team of bank and trust executives which redirected money between banks, secured further international lines of credit, and bought plummeting stocks of healthy corporations. A delicate political issue arose regarding the brokerage firm of Moore and Schley, which was deeply involved in a speculative pool in the stock of the Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad Company. Moore and Schley had pledged over six millions of the Tennessee Coal and Iron (TCI) stock for loans among the Wall Street banks. The banks had called the loans, and the firm could not pay. If Moore and Schley should fail, a hundred more failures would follow and then all Wall Street might go to pieces. Morgan decided they had to save Moore and Schley. TCI was one of the chief competitors of U.S. Steel and it owned valuable iron and coal deposits. Morgan controlled U.S. Steel and he decided it had to buy the TCI stock from Moore and Schley. Judge Gary, head of US Steel, agreed, but would there be antitrust implications that could cause grave trouble for US Steel, which was already dominant in the steel industry? Morgan sent Gary to see President Theodore Roosevelt, who promised legal immunity for the deal. U.S. Steel thereupon paid $30 million for the TCI stock and Moore and Schley was saved. The announcement had an immediate effect; by November 7, 1907, the panic was over. Vowing to never let it happen again, and realizing that in a future crisis there was not likely to be another Morgan, banking and political leaders, led by Senator Nelson Aldrich devised a plan that became the Federal Reserve System in 1913. The crisis underscored the need for a powerful mechanism, and Morgan supported the move to create the Federal Reserve System.

New York American November 1st, 1933
Device to Harness Cosmic Energy by Tesla:

“This new power for the driving of the world’s machinery will be derived from the energy which operates the universe, the cosmic energy, whose central source for the earth is the sun and which is everywhere present in unlimited quantities.”

Tesla’s first radiant energy receiver stored static electricity obtained from the air and converted it to a usable form. Tesla’s invention is a simple version of T.H. Moray’s device. Moray’s device used a unique rectifier (RE-valve) to efficiently capture the static electricity from the surrounding air. Moray’s oscillator tubes (magnetron transducers) utilized this high-voltage energy to generate an internal secondary “cold” fusion reaction.

Stick an antenna up in the air, the higher the better, and wire it to one side of a capacitor, the other going to a good earth ground, and the potential difference will then charge the capacitor. Connect across the capacitor some sort of switching device so that it can be discharged at rhythmic intervals, and you have an oscillating electric output. T.H. Moray simply expanded on Tesla’s idea to use high-voltage to create ionic oscillation.

Tesla’s free-energy concept was patented in 1901 as an “Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy.” The patent refers to “the sun, as well as other sources of radiant energy, like cosmic rays,” that the device works at night is explained in terms of the night-time availability of cosmic rays. Tesla also refers to the ground as “a vast reservoir of negative electricity.”

Tesla was fascinated by radiant energy and its free-energy possibilities. He called the Crooke’s radiometer, a device which has vanes that spin in a vacuum when exposed to radiant energy “a beautiful invention.” He believed that it would become possible to harness energy directly by “connecting to the very wheel-work of nature.” On his 76th birthday at his yearly ritual press conference, Tesla announced a “cosmic-ray motor” when asked if it was more powerful than the Crooke’s radiometer, he answered, “thousands of times more powerful.”

In 1901 Nikola Tesla was one the first to identify “radiant energy.” Tesla says that the source of this energy is our Sun. He concluded that the Sun emits small particles, each carrying so small of a charge, that they move with great velocity, exceeding that of light. Tesla further states that these particles are the neutron particles. Tesla believed that these neutron particles were responsible for all radioactive reactions. Radiant matter is in tune with these neutron particles. Radiant matter is simply a re-transmitter of energy from one state to another.

How Tesla’s radiant energy receiver worked

From the electric Potential that exists between the elevated plate (plus) and the ground (minus), energy builds up in the capacitor, and, after “a suitable time interval,” the accumulated energy will “manifest itself in a powerful discharge” that can do work. The capacitor, says Tesla, should be “of considerable electrostatic capacity, ” and its dielectric made of “the best quality mica, for it has to withstand potentials that could rupture a weaker dielectric.”

Tesla gives various options for the switching device. One is a rotary switch that resembles a Tesla circuit controller, another is an electrostatic device consisting of two very light, membranous conductors suspended in a vacuum. These sense the energy build-up in the capacitor, one charging positive, the other negative, and, at a certain charge level, are attracted, touch, and thus fire the capacitor. Tesla also mentions another switching device consisting of a minute air gap or weak dielectric film that breaks down suddenly when a certain potential is reached.

Tesla received two patents for this radiant energy device; U.S. Patent No. 685,957 - Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy and U.S. Patent No. 685,958 - Method of Utilizing Radiant Energy. Both these patents were filed on March 21, 1901 and granted on November 5, 1901. In these patents he explains:

“The sun, as well as other sources of radiant energy throw off minute particles of matter positively electrified, which, impinging upon the upper plate, communicate continuously an electrical charge to the same. The opposite terminal of the condenser being connected to ground, which may be considered as a vast reservoir of negative electricity, a feeble current flows continuously into the condenser and inasmuch as the particles are …charged to a very high potential, this charging of the condenser may continue, as I have actually observed, almost indefinitely, even to the point of rupturing the dielectric.”

The Earth’s Electrostatic Charge

Tesla’s intent was to condense the energy trapped between the earth and its upper atmosphere and to transform it into an electric current. He pictured the sun as an immense ball of electricity, positively charged with a potential of some 200 billion volts. The earth, on the other hand, is charged with negative electricity. The tremendous electrical force between these two bodies constituted, at least in part, what he called cosmic energy. It varied from night to day and from season to season but it is always present.

The positive particles are stopped at the ionosphere and between it and the negative charges in the ground, a distance of 60 miles, there is a large difference of voltage - something on the order of 360,000 volts. With the gases of the atmosphere acting as an insulator between these two opposite stores of electrical charges, the region between the ground and the edge of space traps a great deal of energy. Despite the large size of the planet, it is electrically like a capacitor which keeps positive and negative charges apart by using the air as a non-conducting material as an insulator.

The earth has a charge of 96,500 coulombs. With a potential of 360,000 volts, the earth constitutes a capacitor of .25 farads (farads = coulombs/volts). If the formula for calculating the energy stored in a capacitor (E =1/2CV2) is applied to the earth, it turns out that the ambient medium contains 1.6 x 1011 joules or 4.5 megawatt-hours of electrical energy. In order to utilize this high-voltage energy you must do two things — make an energy sink and then devise a way of making the “sink” oscillate.

“Zero-Point Energy?”

Such a “sink” has to be at a lower energy state than the surrounding medium and, for the energy to continually flow into it, the energy must be continually pumped out of it. Additionally, this ”
sink” must maintain a lower energy state while meeting the power requirements of the load attached to it. Electrical energy, watt-seconds, is a product of volts x amps x seconds. Because the period of oscillation does not change, either voltage or current has to be the variable in this system’s energy equation. Bifilar wound coils are used in the system because a bifilar wound coil maximizes the voltage difference between its turns, the current is then minimized.

A coil in our system, then, will be set into oscillation at its resonant frequency by an external power source. During the “zero-point” portion of its cycle the coil will appear as one plate of a capacitor. As the voltage across the coil increases, the amount of charge it can siphon will increase. The energy that is taken into the coil through the small energy window (zero-point), call it what you will, appears to be the key to the success of this system. It is at this zero-point where energy is condensed into positive and negative components of current. When energy escapes from the “sink” the magnetic field collapses and a strong magnetic quake is created in it’s wake. A properly tuned system can capture and convert radiant energy in such a prescribed arrangement.

Philadelphia Public Ledger
November 2, 1933
Tesla ‘Harnesses’ Cosmic Energy

Inventor announces discovery to displace fuel in driving machinery. Calls Sun main source. A principle by which power for driving machinery of the world may be developed from the cosmic energy which operates the universe, has been discovered by Nikola Tesla, noted physicist and inventor of scientific devices, he announced today. This principle, which taps a source of power described as “everywhere present in unlimited quantities” and which may be transmitted by wire or wireless from central plants to any part of the globe, will eliminate the need of coal, oil, gas or any other of the common fuels, he said. Dr. Tesla in a statement today at his hotel indicated the time was not far distant when the principle would be ready for practical commercial development. Asked whether the sudden introduction of his principle would upset the present economic system, Dr. Tesla replied, “It is badly upset already.” He added that now as never before was the time ripe for the development of new resources. While in its present form, the theory calls for the development of energy in central plants requiring vast machinery. Dr. Tesla said he might be able to work out a plan for its use by individuals. The central source of cosmic energy for the earth is the Sun, Dr. Tesla said, but “night will not interrupt the flow of new power supply.”

Clearly Tesla is not talking about an atomic reactor. He is directly converting ionized particles generated by radiant matter. It is not nuclear energy as we know it today. Radiant Energy is directly converted to electrical power! Tesla believed that the Sun generates highly charged particles and that radiant matter is a re-transmitter of energy, it is this transfer of energy that could be used for practical purposes.

Have you ever wondered why we have never heard of any doctor or nurse dying from AIDS? Doctors and nurse come in contact with very sick people every day. They also come into direct contact with AIDS patients yet rarely, if any , do they die as a result of repeated contact with such deadly diseases. For decades now we have been told that there is no cure for this or that disease. We are told there is only treatment - very expensive treatment. Do they have super immune systems? Or do they know something we don’t? I’m banking on the latter.

Every disease now existing has a cure. It doesn’t take thousands of monkeys to screw in a light bulb yet that is what we are told every year when hospitals and the various disease organizations launch their yearly donation campaigns. How many decades have they been collecting donations to find a cure for cancer, or diabetes, or heart disease or AIDS? You can’t tell me that $billions in donations isn’t or wasn’t enough to find a cure for all the diseases now inflicting mankind. How many scientists, doctors, nurses and researchers does it take to screw in a light bulb? How many generations of doctors have come and gone who apparently specialize in one disease or another and still no apparent cure? Good thing doctors aren’t car mechanics or plumbers or electricians. Perhaps doctors should be trained like mechanics or plumbers or electricians. Then perhaps they can finally be capable of fixing us when we break down.

The truth is, there is a cure for every disease known to man. You just haven’t been paying attention. There have been many medical reports published by hundreds of doctors and researchers each year and they have all stated that they have found a cure for a disease. It is soon after these reports are presented that they are buried by their research department heads or hospital administrators, or the government’s FDA. You see in order to get paid they have to presents results. When they submit their scientific reports of their findings they get paid. It is after they get paid that the dog chasing its tail cycle repeats again, and again, and again, and again until either the donations stop or until the government stops funding this insane cycle. Once a cure is made public the donations will stop, the trips to the hospital will stop, the trips to the pharmacy will stop, and doctors would only be needed to mend broken bones caused by sports, car accidents or mishaps at home or at work. The cure would also cure the heath care crisis, both health care service and the out of control financial cost.

In 1991 Hulda Regehr Clark discovered the source of HIV. Once the source became clear the cure became obvious. But would it work? She cured 53 cases in a row, all using her method. In her book The Cure for All Diseases she reveals NEW research findings that shows all diseases have simple explanations and cures once their true cause is known. This book describes the causes of both common and extraordinary diseases and gives specific instructions for their cure. The book contains many case histories of diabetes, high blood pressure, seizures, chronic fatigue syndrome, migraines, Alzheimer’s Parkinson’s, multi sclerosis, and others showing that all of these can be simply cured!

The Basis of the her discoveries:

HIV is a virus.
AIDS is a condition.
Sometimes they occur together.
Sometimes they occur separately.

HIV stands for Human Immunodeficiency Virus.
AIDS stands for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

Hulda Regehr Clark discovered that the human intestinal fluke (Fasciolopsis buskii) is the source of the HIV virus. This parasite typically lives in the intestine where it might do little harm, causing only colitis, Crohn’s disease, or irritable bowel syndrome, or perhaps nothing at all. But if it invades a different organ, like the uterus or the kidneys or liver, it does a great deal of harm. If it establishes itself in the thymus, it causes HIV/AIDS!

It only establishes itself in the thymus in some people. These people have benzene in their bodies. All HIV patients (100%) have both benzene and a stage of the intestinal fluke in their thymuses. The solvent benzene is responsible for letting the fluke establish itself in the thymus. In order to get HIV, you must have both the parasite and benzene in your body. The HIV virus belongs to this fluke. It is not difficult to kill this parasite and all its stages.

“AIDS is a condition. When the thymus gland cannot “make” enough T cells, your immunity is lowered. Benzene is the cause of AIDS. Different toxins accumulate in different organs. If you eat or rub in the tiniest bit of benzene it goes directly to the thymus. It damages the thymus so much that everything else is allowed to land there, too: The mercury from metal tooth fillings, the copper from your copper water pipes etc. Is it any wonder that the thymus can’t turn out T cells when it is full of bits of your toothpaste, your hand lotion, your hair spray, toxic food and beverages?” Dr. Hulda Clark. From her book “The Cure for HIV/AIDS”

The human species is now heavily infested with parasites, particularly the intestinal fluke Fasciolopsis buskii, the sheep liver fluke Fasciola hepatica, the pancreatic fluke of cattle Eurytrema pancreatica, the human liver fluke Clonorchis sinensis and the common roundworm, Ascaris. The increase in fluke parasitism is due to the establishment of a new “biological reservoir” in cattle, fowl and household pets. The increase in Ascaris parasitism is probably due to harboring of household pets.

At the same time, microcontamination of the human food supply with derivatives of the petroleum industry has occurred; these include solvents, antiseptics and numerous products used directly in the food industry. In the presence of benzene, Fasciolopsis buskii can complete its entire life cycle in the human body, not requiring a snail as an intermediate host, as it usually does. Other solvents contributing to parasitism include isopropyl alcohol, methanol, xylene, and toluene which now occur as residues in our foods and pollute our body products such as toothpaste, mouthwash, lotions and cosmetics. These solvents are also contaminants of animal feed, and thus are responsible for establishing the new biological reservoir or source of infection of flukes.

Different solvents accumulate preferentially in different organs, a phenomenon known as organotropism. Benzene accumulates in the thymus, resulting in damage to the thymus and completion of the life cycle of Fasciolopsis in the thymus. A stage in the life cycle of Fasciolopsis brings with it the HIV virus. This stage is normally found in snails, and indeed, I have found many snails infected with HIV. In the human, its preferred tissues of colonization are the thymus and penis in the male and the thymus and vagina in the female. The HIV virus has not yet become a human virus, since it disappears within 24 hours after the last fluke stage has been destroyed. However, it could become a true human virus through mutation, no doubt. For this reason it is of paramount importance to end this new kind of parasitism in humans quickly.

Removal of all solvents from the patient’s lifestyle and destruction of all fluke stages as well as elimination of undercooked beef, turkey, chicken and dairy products in the diet results in quick recovery, generally less than one week, from HIV infection. HIV/AIDS could be eradicated in a very short time by clearing our food animals and household pets of fluke parasites and by monitoring all food and feed for solvents.

The cause of benzene accumulation in some persons and not in others appears to be due to a lack of a vitamin, riboflavin (vitamin B2), eating more of a common food toxin, 4,5 benzopyrene, and more of a mycotoxin, zearalenone.

4,5 benzopyrene is present in grilled, broiled (flame heated) foods, even ordinary toast, while zearalenone is plentiful in chips, popcorn and brown rice.

Vitamin B2, 100 mg. This is the vitamin that helps detoxify benzene! Take one to three a day. While recovering from AIDS you need 3 tablets three times a day.

Since developmental stages of the intestinal fluke are found in blood, breast milk, saliva, semen, and urine and can be seen directly in these body fluids using a low power microscope, it follows that this parasite can be transmitted not only through sexual contact and blood, but by kissing on the mouth and breast feeding, and childbearing. However, the recipient would develop HIV/AIDS only if benzene were accumulated in his or her body.

The herbal parasite cleanse

Getting rid of all parasites would be absolutely impossible using clinical medicines that can kill only one or two parasites each. Such medicines also tend to make you quite ill. Imagine taking 10 such drugs to kill a dozen of your parasites! Good news, perhaps, for the drug makers but not for you.

Yet three herbs can rid you of over 100 types of parasites! And without so much as a headache! Without nausea! Without any interference with any drug that you are already on! Does this sound too fantastic? Just too good to be true? They are natures gift to us.The herbs are:

* Black Walnut Hulls (from the black walnut tree)
* Wormwood (from the Artemisia shrub)
* Common Cloves (from the clove tree)

These three herbs must be used together. Black walnut hull and wormwood kill adults and developmental stages of at least 100 parasites. Cloves kill the eggs. Only if you use them together will you rid yourself of parasites. If you kill only the adults, the tiny stages and eggs will soon grow into new adults. If you kill only the eggs, the million stages already loose in your body will soon grow into adults and make more eggs. They must be used together as a single treatment.

Benzene, the cause of AIDS and Cigarette Smoking Cancer

Benzene is present in cigarette smoke and accounts for half of all human exposure to this health hazard. Short-term, high level exposure to benzene, through inhalation or ingestion, causes damage to the central nervous system and can lead to:

* paralysis
* coma
* convulsions
* dizziness
* sleepiness
* rapid heart rate
* tightness in the chest
* tremors
* rapid breathing

Long-term exposure to benzene can cause:

* decreased red blood cells through damage to bone marrow
* anemia
* leukemia
* excessive bleeding
* genetic damage
* negative effects on the immune system

Benzene is a known cause of acute myleoid leukemia, and cigarette smoke is a major source of benzene exposure. Among U.S. smokers, 90% of benzene exposures come from cigarettes.

Are you one of the many Americans who don’t realize that the United States is now a Communist state? What? The United States a Communist state? The United States people have gone far and wide fighting Communism from the beginning. They spilled blood and sacrificed thousands of lives fighting wars against Communism. They confronted the communist Soviet Union for decades both secretly and in very public confrontation. For decades members of Congress asked people who were subpoenaed to appear before them “Are you a Communist”. Today U.S. president Barack Obama has turned the United States from a federal constitutional republic into the new USSR - United States Socialist Republic.

Edward Hunter, an American expert on Communism, whose career as a foreign correspondent, author, editor, world traveler, and specialist in propaganda warfare, qualifies him as an authority on Communist propaganda techniques, stated:

“I spent 30 years, a little bit more perhaps, in countries under various forms of Communist pressure and attack. What I am witnessing in America is no different from what I saw in those other countries. I am often referred to as someone who has made phenomenal predictions that proved correct on things to come. Actually, I have never made a prediction as such in my life. I have only predicted in the manner that one predicts the total of 4 after seeing the figures 2 plus 2.

“I have been watching developments under communism in other parts of the world, and now I see exactly the same developments here in America.”

These developments, he continued, “include, first of all, the penetration of our leadership circles by a softening up and creating a defeatist state of mind. This includes penetration of our educational circles by a similar state of mind, in addition to one other thing—the long-range perspective of the professor who is above anything that is happening here and now, and considers himself as an objective spectator in a long, long vista of history.

“I see, primarily, as part of this softening up process in America, the liquidation of our attitudes on what we used to recognize as right and wrong, what we used to accept as absolute moral standards. We now confuse moral standards with the sophistication of dialectical materialism, with a Communist crackpot Communist crackpot theology which teaches that everything changes, and that what is right or wrong, good or bad, changes as well. So nothing they say is really good or bad. There is no such thing as truth or a lie; and any belief we actually held was simply your being unsophisticated. They don’t say this in so many words, except to those who are already indoctrinated in communism.”

“What they do say to the rest of us is to be objective; and then they twist that word ‘objective’ into meaning what they mean by dialectical materialism.”

“War has changed its form,” Mr. Hunter declared. “The Communists have discovered that a man killed by a bullet is useless. He can dig no coal. They have discovered that a demolished city is useless. Its mills produce no cloth. The objective of Communist warfare is to capture intact the minds of the people and their possessions, so they can be put to use. This is the modern conception of slavery that puts all the others in the kindergarten age.

“The United States is the main battlefield in this Red war. I mean specifically the people and the soil and the resources of the United States.

It should be obvious to anyone who has observed the so-called cold war that the United States was its principal target. We need only read what the Communists themselves say, but we refuse to do so, exactly as we could not believe that Hitler meant what he said in Mein Kampf.

“The first battles in this total war have already been won by the forces of international communism in the United States. These victories are identical to those they have won in every country which they have ultimately taken over. They have succeeded in softening up a large element of the American population, particularly among those to whom we look for guidance, our so-called intellectuals and our so-called liberal circles. They have succeeded in making the United States think and talk of a coexistence period, as if that were an end in itself; while in other parts of the world, as in India, the Reds frankly explain that this coexistence is merely intended to give the Americans an easy way to choose their road toward communism.

This is strategy. Communism merely giving the United States a choice in surrendering by voluntary change of attitude, to avoid more destructive ways of surrender. Unfortunately, in the United States, large elements, mainly among our non-Communist population, have been softened up into believing that if we can just stall on this situation, it will take care of itself. Communism ideology has succeeded in inducing business communities to look to communist trade as a means of restoring prosperity. Large business elements, with all their financial and other resources, are now being used to help the Communist objective of softening up America for recognition and acceptance of Red China, for instance.”

The Communists are being abetted in their brainwashing program in the United States, Mr. Hunter declared, by the collapse of traditional American ideals of self-reliance and individual integrity.

“The Communists have been in operation for a full generation, taking strategic advantage of the American principles, exploiting the best sides in our characters as vulnerabilities, and succeeding for a generation in changing the characteristics of Americans. I remember when I was a young man, every personnel department was looking for leadership qualities. What was sought was a man’s capacity as an individual to achieve new things. Today that is not even considered by personnel departments in their employment policies. They ask, instead, if the man ‘gets along’ with everybody. They do not ask what is his individuality; they ask how he conforms. When we raise a young man to believe that at all costs he must get on with everyone, we have put him into a state of mind that almost guarantees, if he falls into the hands of an enemy such as the Communists, that he will react as he had been raised, to try ‘to get on,’ because he must not be ‘antisocial. Being ‘antisocial’ has become the cardinal sin in our society.”

Yes, the United States fought Communism for decades. The first major manifestation of anti-communism in the United States occurred in 1919 and 1920, during the First Red Scare, led by Attorney General Alexander Mitchell Palmer. Following World War II and the rise of the Soviet Union, many anti-communists in the United States feared that communism would triumph throughout the entire world and eventually be a direct threat to the US government. This fear led to the domino theory, which stated that a communist takeover in any nation could not be tolerated because it would lead to a chain reaction that would result in worldwide communism. There were fears that powerful nations like the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China were using their power to forcibly assimilate other countries into communist rule. The Soviet Union’s expansion into central Europe after World War II was seen as evidence of this.

The 1950s saw a dramatic increase in anti-communism in the United States, particularly due to McCarthyism. Thousands of Americans were accused of being communists or sympathizers, and many became the subject of aggressive investigations by government committees such as the House Committee on Un-American Activities. As a result of sometimes vastly exaggerated accusations, many of the accused lost their jobs and became blacklisted, although most of these verdicts were later overturned.

During the 1980s, the Ronald Reagan administration pursued an aggressive policy against the Soviet Union and its allies by building up weapons programs, including the Strategic Defense Initiative. The Reagan Doctrine was implemented to reduce the influence of the Soviet Union worldwide by providing aid to anti-Soviet resistance movements, including the Contras in Nicaragua and the Mujahideens in Afghanistan. The downing of Korean Air Lines Flight 007 near Moneron Island by the Soviets on Sept. 1, 1983 contributed to the anti-communism of the 1980s. KAL 007 had been carrying 269 people, including a sitting U.S. Congressman, Larry McDonald.

The US government usually argued its anti-communist policies by citing the human rights record of communist states, most notably the Soviet Union during the Joseph Stalin era, Maoist China, North Korea, North Vietnam and the Pol Pot-led Khmer Rouge government and the pro-Hanoi People’s Republic of Kampuchea in Cambodia. Those states allegedly killed millions of their own people and continued to suppress civil liberties of the surviving population. During the 1980s, the Kirkpatrick Doctrine was particularly influential in American politics; it advocated US support of anti-communist governments around the world, including authoritarian dictatorships.

Anti-communism became significantly muted after the fall of the Soviet Union and Eastern bloc communist regimes in Europe between 1989 and 1991; the fear of a worldwide communist takeover was no longer a serious concern. Remnants of anti-communism remain, however, in US foreign policy toward Cuba and North Korea. In the case of Cuba, the US continues to maintain economic sanctions against the country. Tensions with North Korea have heightened as the result of reports that it is stockpiling nuclear weapons, and the assertion that it is willing to sell its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile technology to any group willing to pay a high enough price. Much of the US foreign policy establishment does not regard the People’s Republic of China as communist in any meaningful sense.

Most Americans naively assume that whenever they fought communism, they fought to win. Why else would you fight? Yes 3 anti-communist wars - the Korean War, the Vietnam War and the Cold War were all declared over but did the U.S. win any of them? The Korean War never ended, the Vietnam War was lost and the Cold War simply ended with civilians tearing down of the Berlin Wall.

The U.S. has never fought communism to win. The US policy of halting further communist expansion has always been containment. The U.S. didn’t win any war against communism - both the Korean and Vietnam Wars are a testament to this. The U.S. policy is to only to contain; to fight, to keep fighting endlessly while it drained itself of treasure, money and human life.

Communist United States Test

How would you decide whether or not the United States is Communist? Would you take the word of communist expert Karl Marx? In the Manifesto of the Communist Party, Marx set forth a list of ten steps to Communism. Karl Marx describes in his Communist Manifesto, the ten steps necessary to destroy a free enterprise system and replace it with a system of omnipotent government power, so as to effect a communist socialist state. Marx said a country that takes those ten steps is Communist. How many of those ten steps (listed later on in the article) have the United States taken?

George W Bush wanted to transform the United States into a communist state during his presidency. President-Elect Bush Meet With Congressional Leaders on Capitol Hill in December 2000 and inadvertently exposed his agenda as president of the United States - “there were going to be some times where we don’t agree with each other. But that’s OK. If this were a dictatorship, it’d be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I’m the dictator.”. Then again after just six months in office Bush stated, “”A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there’s no question about it,” he said.” Four star general Tommy Franks, former commander in Iraq, said that Bush will impose martial law and abolish the Constitution after the next “terrorist attack.” Lucky for the United States people another “terrorist attack” didn’t take place in the United States throughout George W Bush’s tenure as president. The elaborate, totalitarian powers Bush sought and the government has written into the law have not been invoked, so there is “nothing to fear.” Wrong! There was “nothing to fear” from Hitler until he put everything in place. Remember Hitler’s Enabling Act? It has been rewritten as the United States Patriot Act. There was “nothing to fear” from Stalin until he consolidated power. There was “nothing to fear” from Mao until Washington had forced President Chiang to flee. There was “nothing to fear” from Castro until he arrived in Havana and was installed by the United States.

The United States people have only been lucky so far in that their worse fears had not been realized during the George W Bush years. Unlucky thought for they have since elected a communist - Barack Obama. Obama is now implementing communist party doctrine laid out by his mentor Karl Marx. Americans can’t claim that they never saw it coming. Obama’s entire presidential campaign was one of reforming the United States to a communist socialist state. Change is just another word for reform - actually conforming to communist ideology. Every communist leader before Obama has promoted themselves with communist slogans superimposed on political posters. Obama has adopted more communists slogans than any other communist leader. Obama speaks in slogans and never explains the thinking that goes into his statements. Slogans like “Yes We Can” — 2008 U.S. presidential campaign slogan of Barack Obama. “Change We Can Believe In” — 2008 U.S. presidential campaign slogan of Barack Obama. “”Organize for Change”", “Stand for Change”, “A leader who can deliver change” and my favorite “Change in America doesn’t start from the top down. It starts from the bottom up.” - shifts blame from the government to the people.

The United States has been increasingly adopting more of Karl Marx’s ideals, sometimes more subtle than other times, yet sometimes rather openly. President Obama has openly suggested Marxist ideologies. Obama’s socialist backing goes back at least to 1996, when he received the endorsement of the Chicago branch of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) for an Illinois state senate seat. Obama endorsed openly Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders in 2006. Obama was later endorsed by the Communist Party USA in his run for President of the United States.

Following are the original ten planks within the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848, followed by a discussion of how America has adopted each of the planks.

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose. - The courts have interpreted the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868) to give the government far more “eminent domain” power than was originally intended. Under the rubric of “eminent domain” and various zoning regulations, land use regulations by the Bureau of Land Management property taxes, and “environmental” excuses, private property rights have become very diluted. As a result, private property in lands, vehicles, and other forms are seized almost every day in the U.S. under the “forfeiture” provisions of the RICO statutes and the so-called War on Drugs. Private owners of property are required to get permission from government relative to the use of their property.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. - The 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913 (which some scholars maintain was never properly ratified), the Social Security Act of 1936, Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933, and various State income taxes established this major Marxist coup in the United States many decades ago. These taxes continue to drain the lifeblood out of the American economy and greatly reduce the accumulation of desperately needed capital for future growth, business starts, job creation, and salary increases.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. - Another Marxist attack on private property rights is in the form of Federal & State estate taxes and other inheritance taxes, which have abolished or at least greatly diluted the right of private property owners to determine the disposition and distribution of their estates upon their death. On January 1st, 2011, the estate tax rate will return to its pre-Bush levels. Practically speaking, this means the difference between dying on December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2011 can mean 55 percent of your estate goes to the United States Socialist Republic government.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. - We call it government seizures, tax liens, “forfeiture” Public “law” 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; and the IRS confiscation of property without due process. The U.S. government is preparing now for a massive confiscation of property of patriots who speak out or write against the “government” (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill).

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly. - The Federal Reserve System, created by the Federal Reserve Act of Congress in 1913, is indeed such a “national bank” and it politically manipulates interest rates and holds a monopoly on legal counterfeiting in the United States. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking. This is exactly what Marx had in mind and completely fulfills this plank. On July 21, 2010 U.S. president Barack Obama signed into law the biggest overhaul of American financial regulation in decades. “This is a bill that creates a vast new and unaccountable bureaucracy that, if past experience is any guide, will lead to countless burdensome, unintended consequences for individuals and small businesses, that will constrict credit and stifle growth in the middle of the worst economic period in memory.” - Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said. In a note of irony, Obama signed the bill with great fanfare in the massive Ronald Reagan Building, named after a president who championed deregulation. Reagan opposed communist state doctrines like that which Obama seeks. “Tear down this wall!” was the challenge from United States President Ronald Reagan to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to destroy the Berlin Wall.

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the State. - In the U.S., communication and transportation are controlled and regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) established by the Communications Act of 1934 and the Department of Transportation and the Interstate Commerce Commission (established by Congress in 1887), and the Federal Aviation Administration as well as Executive orders 11490, 10999 — not to mention various state bureaucracies and regulations including State mandated driver’s licenses. Federal Highway Act of 1916 made federal funds available to States for highway construction), the Interstate Highway System, 1944 (funding began 1956); Interstate Commerce Commission given authority by Congress to regulate trucking and carriers on inland waterways, 1935-40. There is also the federal postal monopoly, AMTRAK and CONRAIL — outright socialist (government-owned) enterprises. Instead of free-market private enterprise in these important industries, these fields in America are semi-cartels through the governments regulatory-industrial complex.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan. - We call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations. The Agriculture Adjustment Act of 1933 provided that farmers will receive government aid if and only if they relinquish control of farming activities. In June 2009 Obama ordered General Motors to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. And, as you’ve also probably heard, the United States became the majority shareholder of the restructured company, with 60% of the stock. Nationalizing a large car manufacturer is just example of Barack Obama adopting the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx.

8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture. - We call it the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor and it’s seen in Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with the United States’ Most Favored Nation trade partner; Communist China. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two “income” family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920’s, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000. And I almost forgot…The Equal Rights Amendment means that women should do all work that men do including the military and since passage it would make women subject to the draft.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country. - We call it the Planning Reorganization Act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public “law” 89-136. Food processing companies, with the co-operation of the Farmers Home Administration foreclosures, are buying up farms and creating “conglomerates.” On March 11, 2009 the U.S. Congress introduced a bill, H.R.875 - Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009, making it illegal to grow your own food, or for “any farm” not to purchase and use government mandated chemicals, additives, and pesticides on all food consumed in the United States. Violations are subject to a fine of up to $1,000,000/day.

10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production. - Americans are being taxed to support what we call ‘public’ schools, but are actually “government force-tax-funded schools ” Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based “Education”. The federal influence of education is evident in “head-start” programs, school lunch programs, textbooks, and library books. Our children are being indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like “majority rules”, and “pay your fair share”. WHERE are the words “fair share” in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)?? NO WHERE is “fair share” even suggested !! The philosophical concept of “fair share” comes from the Communist maxim, “From each according to their ability, to each according to their need! This concept is pure socialism.

“Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.” - Michelle Obama speech at UCLA in which she told supporters that her husband was the only man who could fix American souls — if we elect him President first.

Over the last 4 decades the World Bank has advocated and advised the World governments to begin to drastically reduce the population of the World by any means possible. The World Bank is one of five institutions created at the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944. The International Monetary Fund, a related institution, is the second. Delegates from many countries attended the Bretton Woods Conference. The most powerful countries in attendance were the United States and United Kingdom which dominated negotiations. Although both are based in Washington, D.C., the World Bank is by custom headed by an American, while the IMF is led by a European. The 1944 Bretton Wood Accord forced the World to peg their currencies against the worthless Federal Reserve Note (the US dollar doesn’t exist even today as every US paper note doesn’t state US Dollar it states Federal Reserve Note. Federal Reserve Notes are colored money which has “no value, except by virtue of a government decree — a decree arrived at under conditions of duress, and thus is not legal tender.). A run to convert pounds to gold collapsed the pound and began the end of the Bretton woods accord. It took 3 years while governments tried to salvage the system and also to determine what to do next. It was the US who offered a solution to the crisis - the new Federal Reserve notes with no promise to pay in “lawful money” was released. It is because of this that the World was drawn into the United States orchestrated financial crisis. Today the currencies of the World are all pegged to the worthless US Federal Reserve Note. When the US Federal Reserve Note depreciates so does every other currency in the World.

Why did the World Bank (US Bank) warn it will take “Drastic Steps Necessary” if Nations refused to implement population reduction programs?

1) prevent developing nations from becoming politically powerful;
2) protect U.S. investments (the United States controls the World Bank) in these countries;
3) maintain U.S. access to these countries’ natural resources;
4) limit the number of young people in these countries, who are more likely to challenge existing social and political norms.

For the past 4 decades a covert-sterilization program using vaccines for tetanus, rubella , Tuberculosis, AIDS, anthrax, swine flu, avian flu and other lab created influenza, diseases and infections has been implemented. The majority of produced vaccines contain mercury which has been scientifically proven to cause infertility and other health degrading effects . Between 1963 and 1965 more than 400,000 Colombian women were sterilized in a program funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.

At a time when global warming is becoming broadly recognized as a politically driven, pseudo-scientific power-grab, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates recently “unvielded his vision” of global catastrophe unless net man-made carbon emissions are reduced to zero. In a Feb 2010 video Bill Gates stated his opinion as to how the World can be depopulated. Bill Gates stated that we can lower the world\’s population with vaccines. 4 minutes 30 seconds into the video \”“if we do a really great job on vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps about 10 to 15 percent.” Bill Gates recently pledged $10-billion towards a global vaccine program targeting the “world’s needy children.”

Third World vaccination programs have a well supported linkage with sterilization. In a widely cited and rigorously documented Philippines case, that country’s Supreme Court halted a WHO tetanus vaccination program after it had been shown that the inoculations, given only to young women of child-bearing age, were tainted with a hormone that renders “a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.”

In the 1990`s the UN`s World Health Organization launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45. The stated purpose was to protect against Tetanus or Lockjaw, a painful sometimes lethal infectious reaction to external wounds or cuts. However, the vaccine was not given to men or boys, who are more prone to wounds from cuts and rusty nails than the ladies.

In 1995, the Catholic Women`s League of the Philippines won a court order halting a UNICEF anti-tetanus program because the vaccine had been laced with B-hCG. The Supreme Court of the Philippines found the surreptitious sterilization program had already vaccinated three million women, aged 12 to 45. B-hCG-laced vaccine was also found in at least four other developing countries.

Apparently, this method of sterilization has been patented. An excerpt from that patent for a “birth control vaccine” follows:

“Population is growing at a rapid pace in many economically developing countries and there is a continuing need of an alternate method for regulation of fertility. We proposed several years back a birth control vaccine which induces the formation of antibodies against the human pregnancy hormone, the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). These inventions are described in patents issued in India, U.S.A. and several other countries. (Ref. EP 204566, JP 62286928, CA 1239346, U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,312, CN 8603854). We describe now another invention which generates antibody response of a long duration against hCG after a single or a limited number of injections.”

Erika Schwartz, MD wrote the public interest group Judicial Watch reported 371 serious adverse events in patients who received Merck’s cervical cancer vaccine Gardasil, including three deaths. “The HPV vaccine has only been tested for five years on possibly as low as 100,000 ten year old girls in Africa. ”

Merck invested hundreds of millions of dollars lobbying and marketing the drug and almost persuaded Texas and some other states to mandate its use on sixth-grade schoolgirls. Only a revolt by parents and community groups put a stop to it.

1,637 side effects were reported to the FDA through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Judicial Watch received the information through a Freedom of Information Act request. Approximately 77 percent of the adverse reactions were typical, including pain at the injection site, itching, fever, nausea and dizziness, the group noted. However, one female patient died of a blood clot three hours after receiving the vaccine, the group said. Another 19-year-old patient died of heart failure partially caused by large blood clots two weeks after getting the vaccine. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, both patients were taking birth control pills, which can cause clotting. In addition, a 12-year-old patient died of heart complications six days after receiving Gardasil, according to the VAERS reports.

Eighteen of the 42 women who received Gardasil while pregnant experienced adverse side effects, ranging from spontaneous abortion to fetal abnormalities. Clinical trials used in the FDA’s review of Gardasil showed cases of birth defects among women who received the vaccine within 30 days of conception. Gardasil is not recommended for pregnant women, according to the product’s label.

Merck recently submitted a supplemental biologic license application to the FDA to market Gardasil to prevent vaginal and vulvar cancers.

Another MD, David Ayoub, revealed the link between vaccine mercury to Autism as well its connections to “National Security Study Memorandum 200”; for population control.

“You can’t convince them this is right. Do you know why? Because they already know it. They told me they know it. They cannot admit it because of civil and criminal, potential problems. You can’t convince someone who already knows it.” ~ Mark Geier, M.D. - Chicago, Illinois May 30th, 2004 at the Autism One Conference

The NSSM 200, and the US population control policy which came from it, is targeting thirteen countries for depopulation, countries which, if allowed to increase sufficiently in population, were seen to be able to challenge US economic superiority.

Billions of US taxpayer dollars have since gone into funding population control in countries around the globe. NSSM 200 justifies the radical population control methods it implemented by claiming it would: 1) prevent developing nations from becoming politically powerful; 2) protect U.S. investments in these countries; 3) maintain U.S. access to these countries’ natural resources; 4) limit the number of young people in these countries, who are more likely to challenge existing social and political norms.

“Gardasil contains Polysorbate 80, which is linked to infertility in mice,” noted Dee Nicholson, National Communications Director for Freedom in Canadian Health Care.

WHO Vaccine that infected the World with AIDS

Project Coast, was a covert project to create a genetically engineered bio weapon to attack only the black population and to develop a vaccine to block human fertility in blacks. Project Coast succeeded in developing such a weapon that has killed millions of people World wide.

On May 11, 1987, The London Times, one of the world’s most respected newspapers, published an explosive article entitled, “Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus.”

The story revealed that the smallpox eradication vaccine program sponsored by the WHO (World Health Organization) was responsible for unleashing AIDS in Africa. Almost 100 million Africans living in central Africa were vaccinated by the WHO (World Health Organization). The vaccine was responsible for awakening a “dormant” AIDS virus infection on the continent.

An advisor to the WHO admitted, “Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation for the explosion of AIDS.”

Robert Gallo, M,D., the co-discoverer of HIV, told The Times, “The link between the WHO program and the epidemic is an interesting and important hypothesis.

I cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying for some years that the use of live vaccines such as that used for smallpox can activate a dormant infection such as HIV.”

In September 1987, at a conference sponsored by the National Health Federation in Monrovia, California, William Campbell Douglass, M.D., bluntly blamed the WHO for murdering Africa with the AIDS virus.

In a widely circulated reprint of his talk entitled “W.H.O. Murdered Africa” , he accused the organization of encouraging virologists and molecular biologists to work with deadly animal viruses in an attempt to make an immunosuppressive hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans.

From the Bulletin of the World Health Organization (Volume 47, p.259, 1972 - bulletin_1972_47(2)_memo1.pdf), he quoted a passage that stated: Recommendations (3) “An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. e.g. by depressing 7S versus 19S antibody, or by affecting T cell function as opposed to B cell function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively the cells responding to the viral antigens. If this proves to be the case, virus-induced immunodepression might conceivably be highly instrumental in prolonging certain virus infections, such as murine leukemia, hepatitis, … ”

According to Douglass, “That’s AIDS. What the WHO is saying in plain English is Let’s cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T-cell system of man, an acquired immune deficiency.‘”

Conveniently lost in the history of AIDS is the Hepatitis-B vaccine experiment that immediately preceded the decimation of gay Americans. A “cohort” of over a thousand young homosexuals were injected with the Hepatitis-B vaccine at the New York Blood Center in Manhattan during the period from November 1978 to October 1979. Similar Hepatitis-B vaccine experiment were conducted in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Denver, St. Louis, and Chicago, beginning in 1980. Three months after the experiment began, the first cases of AIDS reported to the CDC appeared in young gay men in Manhattan. The first San Francisco AIDS case appeared in that city in September 1980, six months after the Hepatitis-B experiment started there. In June 1981 the AIDS epidemic became “official.”

The WHO virologists and government epidemiologists claimed at the time of the outbreak that HIV originated in African green monkeys. Purportedly the monkey virus “jumped species” and entered the black population. From there the WHO claimed it migrated to Haiti and Manhattan. After the virus entered the black heterosexual population in the late 1970s, it rapidly spread to millions of blacks because of transfusions with HIV-infected blood, dirty needles, promiscuity and genital ulcers. To this day they still claim that HIV came from monkeys and the rain forest. The scientific community has proven that AIDS was triggered by the WHO small pox vaccination program. The WHO created the AIDS epidemic. There is however some truth in the link between monkeys and the AIDS virus. When they created the vaccine that would trigger AIDS they used monkeys to test their biological weapon. Monkey DNA matches Human DNA 98% of the time.

The DNA of the pigs and monkeys being very close ours, makes them excellent test subject to man make the AIDS virus and another more recent attempt to depopulate the World with, the Swine Flu virus. When the U.S. government created the swine flu virus, in their labs in Fort Detrick Maryland, they used swines (pigs) to test their depopulation weapon. Because they used swines to develop this biological weapon they called their newly man made virus the Swine Flu virus.

The scientific discoveries of today reveal the relationship between all humans, and the relationship that exists between pigs, monkey’s and humans. Before any pharmaceutical product or drug is allowed to be made public pigs and monkeys are always used to test the toxicity, side effects and potential lethal effects. Pigs and monkeys are sacrificed in the name of science. Pigs and monkeys are the first victims of the World government bodies’ biological weapons program to murder millions of people. Vaccines are used by the WHO, the IMF, the World Bank, the UN and U.S. depopulate the World. Vaccines are their weapons and millions of people around the World are shot and killed every year by this silent killer.

Special Report EIR (Executive Intelligence Review) March 10, 1981

Investigations by EIR have uncovered a planning apparatus operating outside the control of the White House whose sole purpose is to reduce the world’s population by 2 billion people through war, famine, disease and any other means necessary. This apparatus, which includes various levels of the government is determining U.S. foreign policy. In every political hotspot — El Salvador, the so-called arc of crisis in the Persian Gulf, Latin America, Southeast Asia and in Africa- the goal of U.S. foreign policy is population reduction. The targeting agency for the operation is the National Security Council’s Ad Hoc Group on Population Policy. Its policy-planning group is in the U.S. State Department’s Office of Population Affairs, established in 1975 by Henry Kissinger. This group drafted the Carter administration’s Global 2000 document, which calls for global population reduction, and the same apparatus is conducting civil wars as a conscious depopulation project.

“There is a single theme behind all our work-we must reduce population levels,” said Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA). “Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it. “The professionals,” said Ferguson, “aren’t interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population or else we will have trouble.

So steps are taken. El Salvador was an example where the US failure to lower population by simple means has created the basis for a national security crisis. The government of El Salvador failed to use US programs to lower their population. They got a civil war because of it…. There will be dislocation and food shortages. They still have too many people there.”

Civil wars are somewhat drawn out ways to reduce population, the OPA official added. “The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa or through disease like the Black Death.” Weather Control Technology (HAARP) is now being utilized specifically for artificially inducing states of famine and drought.

The Ad Hoc Group and OPA estimate that they may be able to keep a billion people from being born through contraceptive programs, vaccination programs and through manufactured (designer) diseases and viral infections.

On July 29, 1969, only days after the Department of Defense (DOD) asked for $10 million from Congress to fund the development of a “synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired . . .” on that day, the chairman of the Republican Task Force on Earth Resources and Population, the Honorable George H. W. Bush, U.S. Representative from Texas, 7th District (1967–71), stressed the pressing need for population control activities to fend off “a growing Third World crisis.”

The Development of the AIDS virus was funded in 1969 (three years before the request for development by the World Health Organization) through funds obtained by the United States Defense Department. The Defense Department requested and received $10 million via House Bill 15090, which was reviewed in Hearings before the Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives during the ninety-first Congress in review of the Defense Appropriations for 1970.

Part Five of House Bill 15090 was entitled RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION, sponsored by the Department of the Army, the Advanced Research Project Agency (now DARPA), and Defense Research and Engineering.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970

HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NINETY-FIRST CONGRESS
FIRST SESSION
SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS

H.B. 15090

PART 5
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

Department of the Army
Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency
Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering

Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1969
UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY

[pg.] 129 TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969

SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS

Funding was approved with the passing of Public Law 91-171, title VI, Secs. 605, 608, 83 Stat. 480. on Dec 29, 1969

There are about seventy offshore jurisdictions around the world. Among the most famous are Switzerland, Grand Cayman, Luxembourg, British Virgin Islands, Jersey, Liechtenstein. Offshore centers allow companies and bank accounts to keep their records, including owners’ names, secret even from regulators and law enforcement. They apply nor collect taxes, which is why they are known as tax havens. Most of them give these advantages only to foreigners.

Offshore financial centers are the parallel financial services system for criminals: for corporate crooks and fraudsters, tax evaders, drug and arm traffickers, terrorists and for government officials who steal from their countries. The big international banks all have offshore subsidiaries where they can hide the money of clients who are evading taxes at home or committing other crimes. And in many countries, including the United States, it is relatively easy to set up companies and bank accounts without providing documentation about the true owners.

Corrupt Western business people, negligent or complicit bankers and offshore tax havens – all the enablers of corruption — make a lot of money by helping the world’s crooks. They provide the capital for those crooks to stay in power, and they tilt the playing field against the interests of firms and individuals who do business honestly.

Offshore law firms set up shell companies – fake or front companies – that have no purpose other than to carry out phony transactions to justify the movement of money into crooks’ secret accounts.

Who in the US government use offshore accounts and shell corporations? One very public figure is none other than former first lady and current US Secretary of Sate Hillary R Clinton. Back in 2008 financial disclosure documents filed by the New York senator show she and her husband, former president Bill Clinton, have made at least $50 million since leaving the White House in 2001. How are they amassing such wealth? Through the Clinton Foundation. Bill Clinton set up this shell charity organization. On the surface it looks like a legitimate charity organization that collects donations for fighting AIDS in Africa and promote sustainable development. But the true purpose has nothing to do with helping the people of Africa. It is a front. It is just one of many offshore shell companies that is used to launder money that the Clintons, George HW Bush and George W Bush stole from the American people. The donations that were received to help the African people have not gone to the African people. It has gone towards building the Clinton Presidential Library and sends the former president around the globe.

Just a fraction of the money that goes through the Clinton Foundation could build entire towns and villages in Africa. After so many years Africa still looks the same as the day that the Clintons formed the Clinton Foundation. You would think that after so many years the African people would now be cured of AIDs and their living conditions would be greatly improved with the help of the Clintons. After all the Clintons receive $millions from foreign countries and some of the richest people in the World. Over $25,000,000 from The Children’s Investment Fund Foundation and UNITAID. $10,000,001 to $25,000,000 from AUSAID, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Stephen L. Bing, COPRESIDA-Secretariado Tecnico, Fred Eychaner, Frank Giustra, Chief Executive Officer, The Radcliffe Foundation, Tom Golisano, The Hunter Foundation, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, The ELMA Foundation, Theodore W. Waitt. $5,000,001 to $10,000,000 from bankrupt Government of Norway, Nationale Postcode Loterij, Haim Saban and The Saban Family Foundation, Michael Schumacher, The Wasserman Foundation. $1,000,001 to $5,000,000 from; S. D. Abraham, Absolute Return for Kids (ARK), Sheikh Mohammed H. Al-Amoudi, Alltel Corporation, Nasser Al-Rashid, Smith and Elizabeth Bagley, The Eli & Edythe Broad Foundation, Richard Caring, Gilbert R. Chagoury, Citi Foundation, Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative - Canada, Victor P. Dahdaleh & The Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Charitable Foundation, Robert Disbrow, Dubai Foundation, Elton John AIDS Foundation, Entergy, Mr. Issam M. Fares & The Wedge Foundation, Wallace W. Fowler, Friends of Saudi Arabia, Presidential Inaugural Committee, Princess Diana Memorial Fund. Some of the donors give because their intentions are good and sincere but the majority are made for political favors or as money laundering transactions. Of the total amounts contributed from the listed people and organizations how much has actually gone to the people the foundations is allegedly created for? Where has the bulk of the funds received gone to?

USA Today, in an editorial distributed during the Obama campaign, exposed the true purpose of the Clinton Foundation. Donors, who include foreign governments have pledged more than $500 million to the Clinton Foundation and that money has been laundered. Some of that money was illegally used to fund Hillary Clinton’s failed 2008 presidential campaign bid. A federal statute prohibits persons who are neither U.S. citizens nor permanent residents (that is, holders of “green cards”) from contributing any money to candidates for state or federal office, or to American political parties. The provision was originally enacted in the 1970s.

The Clintons have become repeat offenders of federal election laws. The 1996 United States campaign finance controversy, also known as Chinagate, was an effort by the People’s Republic of China to influence domestic American politics during the 1996 federal elections.

The issue first received public attention in early 1997, with news that a Justice Department investigation had uncovered evidence that agents of China sought to direct contributions to the Clinton-Gore Democratic National Committee (DNC) in violation of U.S. laws regarding foreign political contributions. The Chinese government denied all accusations. Twenty-two people were convicted of fraud or for funneling Asian funds into the United States elections, and others fled U.S. jurisdiction. All were associates of Bill Clinton or Al Gore.

What role did the Clinton Foundation have in the 2008 presidential campaign? Hillary Clinton laundered money contributed by foreign donors to her campaign. On February 6, 2008 the New York Times reported that Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, facing big primaries against her rival Senator Barack Obama in places like Ohio and Texas lend her campaign money. Her campaign office confirmed that she’d already lent her campaign $5 million of her own money in late January. A statement from her camp:

“The loan illustrates Senator Clinton’s commitment to this effort and to ensuring that our campaign has the resources it needs to compete and win across this nation.”

Senator Clinton acknowledged the loan, saying: “I loaned the campaign $5 million from my money. That’s where I got the money. I did it because I believe very strongly in this campaign, and we had a great month fund-raising in January, broke all our records, but my opponent was able to raise more money and we intended to be competitive – and we were – and I think the results last night proved the wisdom of my investment.”

Hillary didn’t actually reveal where the money came from. The reporters should have asked Hillary where did she get the $5 million. Was it from earnings or was it from the Clinton Foundation? If it was discovered that it came from the Clinton Foundation then she should have been indicted for campaign financial fraud as Clinton Foundation funding is mostly gained from foreign donors. Who tried to influence the 2008 electoral campaign with an illegal $5 million contribution?

Hillary Clinton broke the law when she “loaned” her campaign $5 million. The FECA places limits on contributions by individuals and groups to candidates, party committees and PACs. According to US law an Individual (Hillary Clinton) may contribute a maximum of $2,300 per election to Federal candidates, up to $28,500 per year to national party committees, and a combined total of up to $108,200 during the two year period to all Federal campaigns, parties, and other political committees. In one day, one individual, Hillary Clinton, gave her campaign $5 million - $4,891,800 over the allowed legal contribution limit. Has Hillary been charged for this intentional gross violation of US law?

Where has all the Bailout money gone to?

Hillary Clinton is just one of the many criminals holding some the highest offices of the United States government. Who else is involved? Who else is laundering $trillions through offshore banks and shell corporations? Look no further than those who pushed through the Wall Street Bailouts. George W Bush money laundered $700 billion through the banks that created the United States financial crisis - mainly the privately owned and operated banks of the Federal Reserve. Barack Hussein Obama money laundered another $787 billion to the same banks.

Has these bailouts helped people recover their repossessed homes? Have they helped lift the threat of repossession from millions of families? Evidently not. No tax paying America has benefited from these money laundering schemes. The job creation that Obama has been boasting about are all only temporary jobs. All created to get votes in November. Once the election is lost those Democrats jobs will cease to exist.

The jobs that have been temporarily created by Obama (”We are the ones we have been waiting for”) amounts to a few $billion. Where has the rest of the $trillion Bailout money gone to? To the Federal Reserve banks’ CEO in the form of “unearned bonuses”, to secret offshore numbered accounts set up for Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary R. Clinton, George W Bush, Bill Clinton, George HW Bush, Henry Paulson, Dick Cheney, Rahm Emanuel, Timothy Geithner ……….., and to the newly created Clinton Bush Haiti Fund - another shell company, conveniently crafted by the Bush Clinton opportunists, that have no purpose other than to carry out phony transactions to justify the movement of money into these crooks’ secret accounts.

No accounting whatsoever

It’s something any bank would demand to know before handing out a loan: Where’s the money going? But after receiving billions in aid from U.S. taxpayers, the nation’s largest banks (all part of the Federal Reserve) say they can’t track exactly how they’re spending the money or they simply refuse to discuss it. Some banks said they simply didn’t know where the money was going.

In US law, money laundering is the practice of engaging in financial transactions to conceal the identity, source, or destination of illegally gained money.

There has been no accounting of how banks are spending that money. Lawmakers summoned bank executives to Capitol and implored them to lend the money — not to hoard it or spend it on corporate bonuses, junkets or to buy other banks. Since the bailout monies have been issued the banks have been doing nothing but hoarding the money, giving it to their CEOs as corporate bonuses, buying up smaller banks, and shipping $billions to newly created offshore banks and shell companies.

There is no process in place to keep track of where the money is going and there are no consequences for banks who misuse and illegally misappropriate $trillions in US tax dollars. “It is entirely appropriate for the American people to know how their taxpayer dollars are being spent in private industry,” said Elizabeth Warren, the top congressional watchdog overseeing the financial bailout. But, at least for now, there’s no way for taxpayers to find that out.

Pressured by the Bush administration to approve the money quickly, Congress attached nearly no strings on the $700 billion bailout in October. And the Treasury Department, which doles out the money, never asked banks how it would be spent.

“The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.” - Thomas Jefferson

Scientists have made a breakthrough in man’s desire to control the forces of nature – unveiling plans to weaken hurricanes and steer them off course, to prevent tragedies such as Hurricane Katrina - UK Telegraph 21 Oct 2007

The damage done to New Orleans in 2005 has spurred two rival teams of climate experts, in America and Israel, to redouble their efforts to enable people to play God with the weather.

Mr Alamaro said: “The social and legal issues are daunting. If a hurricane were coming towards Miami with the potential to cause damage and kill people, and we diverted it, another town or village hit by it would sue us. They’ll say the hurricane is no longer an act of God, but that we caused it.”

NASA steers Hurricane Earl in Project GRIP?

In 2007 scientists successfully steered a hurricane in simulation. Are they performing a live testing of their theory with Hurricane Earl? On August 11, 2010 NASA announced that it was less than 2 weeks away from initiating Project GRIP (Genesis and Rapid Intensification Processes) - their quest for the holy grail of hurricane research. Project GRIP will try and discover the exact conditions required to kickstart a tropical depression into a hurricane. Though scientists already know how to develop hurricanes, it is unkown what processes ultimately drive depressions to form into the intense, spinning storms that lash the U.S. coasts each summer.

“Hurricane formation and intensification is really the ‘holy grail’ of this field,” said Ed Zipser, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Utah and one of three program scientists helping to lead the Genesis and Rapid Intensification Processes (GRIP) experiment this summer.

With GRIP, NASA’s first domestic hurricane project since 2001, the agency has assembled the largest-ever hurricane research experiment. Three NASA planes, multiple NASA satellites and four planes from research partners NOAA and NSF will conduct experiments in hurricane forming, manipulation (steering) and intensification. The intense scientific focus on these meteorological processes will provide new insight into the fundamental physics of hurricanes and ultimately give the United States the ability to control hurricanes.

The GRIP fleet includes NASA’s Global Hawk, the unmanned drone built by Northrop Grumman and also used by the U.S. Air Force, WB-57 and DC-8. The NASA aircraft will be deployed from Florida (DC-8), Texas (WB-57) and California (Global Hawk).

“We want to see storms that become hurricanes, and we want to see some that don’t become hurricanes, so we can compare the data. The same is true for hurricane intensification.” ~ GRIP Project Manager Marilyn Vasques

NASA will be using various weather modifying tools to develop, intensify and steer a hurricane. They include a powerful microwave radiometer and a “radar” and a NASA-designed and built lidar (laser radar). The laser radar mounted on a Global Hawk is to be used to heat the top of a hurricane - to weaken a hurricane and steer them. The “radar” that NASA will use is said to be the Sea-Based X-Band Radar. It is a floating, self-propelled, mobile radar station designed to operate in high winds and heavy seas. It is part of the U.S. Defense Department Ballistic Missile Defense System.

HAARP Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX) arrives in Pearl Harbor Jan. 9 2006 for repairs and refurbishment, after completing a 15,000-mile journey from Corpus Christi, Texas aboard the heavy lift vessel MV Blue Marlin

The Sea-Based X-Band Radar is mounted on a fifth generation Norwegian-designed, Russian-built CS-50 semi-submersible twin-hulled oil-drilling platform. The hull was originally built at Vyborg Shipyard, hull number 101. Conversion of the platform was carried out at the AmFELS yard in Brownsville, Texas; the radar mount was built and mounted on the platform at the Kiewit yard in Ingleside, Texas, near Corpus Christi.

The Sea Based X-Band Radar is the world’s largest floating phased array X-band radar. It is operated by the US Department of Defense (Missile Defense Agency) and its movement and location is classified. In 2005 it was engaged in a 52-day deployment in the Gulf where it completed more than 100 major test activities. The 52-day deployment started in late August and ended on Oct. 14, 2005. Air Force Lt. Gen. Henry “Trey” Obering, director of the MDA, said it had demonstrated the ability to achieve most of its major operational and sustainment capabilities. SBX was in the Gulf at the same time as Hurricane Katrina formed on August 23, 2005. On Saturday, August 27, the storm reached Category 3 intensity on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale, becoming the third major hurricane of the season. An eyewall replacement cycle disrupted the intensification, but caused the storm to nearly double in size. Katrina again rapidly intensified, attaining Category 5 status on the morning of August 28 and reached its peak strength at 1:00 p.m. CDT that day, with maximum sustained winds of 175 mph (280 km/h) and a minimum central pressure of 902 mbar.

Under the laws of the Constitution of the United States as provided for in Article II, Section 1:

“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” for the following reasons:

# 1) Obama was NOT born of mother and father who were BOTH US Citizens. - in order to be considered a “natural born citizen” as required by the U.S. Constitution to be President of the United States of America (POTUS), BOTH parents MUST be U.S. Citizens. Obama’s natural birth father was Kenyan and a British subject and therefore it is clear that Obama is not and can never be considered a “natural born citizen”.

# 2) Obama was a British citizen ‘at birth.’ - When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children. Therefore admittedly, Barack Hussein Obama, aka: Barack Obama, Jr., aka: Barack Hussein Obama, aka: Barry Soetoro; aka: Barry Obama; aka: Barack H. Obama, aka: Barack Obama II, presumed President of the United States admits Great Britain governed his status. A “NATURAL BORN” CITIZEN is one that CANNOT be “GOVERNED” by GREAT BRITAIN or any other country.

A “natural born citizen” is a person born on U.S. Soil of parents of which both must be U.S. Citizens and a “natural born citizen” can only be governed by the United States. The Constitutional definition of a “natural born citizen” states that BOTH parents MUST be U.S. Citizens AND Born in the U.S. mainland. Therefore it is quite clear that Barack Hussein Obama cannot be a “natural born citizen” and has knowingly committed fraud against the people of the United States of America in his application for candidacy for Office of the President of the United States of America, and lied under Oath.

Even before Obama was sworn in as president of the United States many high ranking officers and officials petitioned the courts to prove Obama’s ineligibility to be president according to the United States Supreme law - the United States Constitution.

All United States Military Officers, all Congressmen and women, the president, vice-president and speaker of the house are all sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States. When a military officer or public official is aware of any malfeasance by an offender it is their SWORN duty to come forward and present such accusation and complaint.

One high ranking officer did come forward and filed a formal criminal accusation and complaint against Obama. Lt. Commander Walter Fitzpatrick, III, retired, United States Navy and a graduate of the United States Naval Academy, on March 17, 2009 petitioned the court. His complaint was entered as:

“Now you [Obama] have broken in and entered the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, dissembling, and deceit. Posing as an impostor president and commander in chief you have stripped civilian command and control over the military establishment. Known military criminal actors-command racketeers-are now free in the exercise of military government intent upon destruction of America’s constitutional government.

My sworn duty Mr. Obama is to stand against what you stand for. You are not my president. You are not my commander in chief.”

If Obama was eligible, why did Obama employ an army of attorneys and spend great sums of money beginning with Philip Berg’s lawsuit in August 21, 2008, to avoid proving his eligibility. All Obama had to do is what John McCain did, provide Congress with a vault copy of his birth certificate, i.e., a real birth certificate, not a record of a birth certificate like Obama has tried to do.

Other public records prove that Obama is not eligible on the grounds of loyalty to the flag and to country of the United States of America. Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981 on an Indonesian passport. Not a United States passport. Obama himself has openly admitted and public documents prove that his father was Kenyan, under British rule. When Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981 he gave up his US citizenship to willingly became an Indonesian citizen. He was 20 years old and as an adult he was old enough to know the consequences of this action. He, not his mother, made the adult decision to renounce his US citizenship. Once he renounced his US citizenship his loyalty is no longer to the United States. There is yet to be any public record made available that Obama is legally a US citizen.

Charles E. Jones
Brigadier General US Air Force, Retired, Lifetime subject to recall for active duty, Recipient of the Distinguished Service Medal (AF) 02.04.09;

“We the People of the United States of America” are entitled to know the legal qualifications of the President and Commander in Chief. For the better good and National Security of “We the People of the United States” and for Absolute Command of the Military Forces of the United States, I whole heartedly support the efforts of Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ for taking legal action to determine whether or not Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, Citizen of Indonesia and possibly citizen of Kenya, is eligible to become President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces.”

OBAMA has been inaugurated as the president of the United States. However, to properly assume such office, OBAMA must meet the qualifications specified in Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution for the Office of the President of the United States, which includes that he must be a ‘natural born’ citizen”.

“OBAMA has failed to demonstrate that he is a ‘natural born’ citizen. There have been a number of legal challenges before various state and federal courts regarding aspects of non-, lost, or dual citizenship concerning OBAMA. Those challenges, in and of themselves, demonstrate Petitioners’ argument that reasonable doubt exists as to his eligibility to serve as President of the United States.

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) admitted that if Barack Hussein Obama was elected as President and allowed to serve as President of the United States in violation of our Constitution, it will create a Constitutional crisis. The Democratic National Committee has been promoting Barack Hussein Obama’s Presidential election knowing he was ineligible to serve as President of the United States. Even the U.S. the State Department has confirmed Obama was a dual citizen of the U.K. and the U.S. from 1961 to 1963 and a dual citizen of Kenya and the U.S. from 1963 to 1982.

Today is suppose to be the day the United States ends its war in Iraq. It is also the day that Obama promised the American people that all US troops would be withdrawn from Iraq. Obama has broken his promise to the people. More than 50,000 US troops will not be coming home as promised. Obama has ordered that over 50,000 US “combat” troops are to remain in Iraq until the end of 2011. The war is not over. The US has not withdrawn from Iraq. Combat readiness remains. The US troops will still go on patrol. They will still launch armed attacks against alleged enemies. They will still kidnap and kill Iraqi civilians and more than likely they will still torture them. The only thing that has changed is the official mission statement.

Now begins the mass deception by U.S. president Barack Obama that the U.S. has withdrawn from Iraq as promised. Obama has broken the single most important promise he made to the United States people. It was this promise that put Obama in the White House.

“I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank. ” - Barack Obama, October 27, 2007 Campaign Promise

50,000 troops still remain and will remain past the 2011 deadline. 50,000 troops is bigger than the size of the regular armies of the majority of countries in the World. The U.S. combat operations have not ended in Iraq. Using one single comparison that declares a deception campaign by the United States is found in the fact that the number of U.S. “combat troops” that will remain behind after todays propaganda campaign ends is more than the entire regular combat troops of Sweden - 33,900, Serbia - 47,000, Portugal - 44,900, Oman - 41,700, Norway - 27,600, Liberia - 13,000, Laos - 29,100, Kuwait - 15,500, Kenya - 24,120, Hungary - 33,400, Georgia - 17,500, Finland - 31,850, Denmark - 22,880, Cuba - 46,000, Croatia - 20,000, Chad - 30,350, Bulgaria - 39,000, Belgium - 39,260, or Austria - 34,600.

There are 37000 American combat troops still stationed in South Korea. The war still hasn’t ended between North and South Korea even though the US also declared an end to combat operations decades ago. There’s been an armistice, but no peace treaty. Iraq is another Korea. There will always exists tensions between the U.S. and the Iraqi people because the U.S. hasn’t and doesn’t intend on withdrawing its combat troops from Iraq. The U.S. government’s “stay behind policy” has always been the root cause of all terrorist threats to the United States. The U.S. has just created another North Korea by leaving 50,000 combat ready troops in Iraq.

More than 50,000 U.S. combat troops will not be going home because Barack Hussein Obama broke a promise to the people of the United States of America. On his campaign website, Obama promised he would “remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months.” His commitment to bring combat troops home by May 20, 2010, and end the war gave him an edge among Democrats over candidate Hillary Clinton.

Even as combat troops are brought home, Pentagon officials have said fresh units will continue deploying to Iraq.

Broken promise: Transparency

On the White House website, the Obama administration claims it will be “the most open and transparent in history.

The administration released a memo on Jan. 21, stating:

My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.

Government should be transparent. Transparency promotes accountability and provides information for citizens about what their Government is doing. …

However, Congress and the administration hurried the $787 billion, 1,027-page American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to a vote after allowing lawmakers just a few hours to read the bill. It was also available online in a form that could not be keyword searched.

While former administrations immediately posted transcripts of presidential speeches – including some remarks before delivery – the White House website often waits until days or even weeks after an event to release transcripts.

Also, reports of tax evasion by Obama nominees is evidence that the administration is not as transparent as promised. Just before Obama named Timothy Geithner to be his treasury secretary, the president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank quietly paid $26,000 in back taxes and interest due since 2001 and 2002.

Obama characterized the eight-year tax evasion as “an innocent mistake.”

But as many as six of his picks defaulted on taxes, including former nominee for health and human services secretary, Tom Daschle; former nominee for chief performance officer, Nancy Killefer; U.S. trade representative nominee Ron Kirk, Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

While campaigning for the Democratic nomination, Hillary Clinton was being investigated for tax evasion and numerous FEC violations. One ongoing tax evasion and FEC violation investigation involved Peter Franklin Paul, a Hollywood entrepreneur and former international lawyer who co-founded Stan Lee Media with Spider Man creator Stan Lee and who was the plaintiff in the landmark civil fraud suit against Bill and Hillary Clinton exposing the Clinton Culture of Corruption hidden by the government and the media.

His efforts during 2000 to hire Bill Clinton, after he left the White House in 2001, resulted in his being asked by Bill Clinton to underwrite and executive produce The Hollywood Gala Tribute Concert and Salute to President Clinton in August, 2000.

At Hillary Clinton’s personal insistence, Paul agreed to hire Clinton friend and Grammys producer Gary Smith to produce what became the largest private concert ever produced and unseen by the public. The Gala was also the largest fund-raising event for Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign. Hillary Clinton’s efforts to hide her role with then President Bill Clinton in illegally soliciting and coordinating Paul’s $1.6 million plus expenditure-donation to her campaign resulted in the sham criminal prosecution by the DOJ Office of Public Integrity of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen intended to exculpate Hillary.

Rosen was prosecuted for hiding from Hillary and her Senate campaign the $1.2 million paid by Paul to produce the Gala, causing Hillary’s campaign to file three false FEC reports beginning in October, 2000. Yet Hillary Clinton told the Washington Post through her spokesman Howard Wolfson in August, 2000 that the Gala cost more than $1 million and was an “in kind” contribution. Not only was Hillary and her spokesman not called as a witness to explain how they knew what Rosen was charged with hiding from them, but the Judge and Prosecutor both told the jury that Hillary had no knowledge of anything about the case! Hillary’s taped involvement in producing the event was hidden by the government for two years after the Judge and Prosecutor made those remarks.

The charges of hiding Peter Paul’s expenditures from the FEC resulted in a secret settlement by her campaign treasurer with the FEC that forced an admission of filing false reports that hid more than $721,000 contributed by Paul.

Hillary’s direction of the obstruction of the Department of Justice, Federal Election Commission, Office of Inspector General, Rosen Grand Jury and Senate Ethics Committee Investigations of her role in the matter resulted in numerous serious, ongoing felony violations of federal law that have never been reported or prosecuted. After being chosen by Obama for the Secretary of State position charges were quickly dropped by Bill Clinton appointed judges .

Long list of Obama’s broken promises

- I will cut the deficit in half by doubling spending (When Obama was sworn in as president the US National Debt was $10.6 trillion. In just 20 months Obama has pushed it to $13.4 trillion. It took the U.S. government 191 years – from 1791 until 1982 – to run up its first trillion dollars in debt. The national debt was actually paid off completely on January 1, 1835, under the presidency of Andrew Jackson. The national debt was actually eliminated; the surplus that year was distributed to the states. It remains to this day the only time in history a major country has been debt free. President Obama’s budget plans call for running the national debt to $16.2-trillion by 2012, and an astounding $20-trillion by 2015.)…..Broken

- I will change the Washington culture of corruption….Broken

- I will reach across the isle (Has fought the Republicans on every bill since elected)….Broken

- I will have no earmarks in stimulus, there are now well over 9000……….Broken

- I will have transparency in White House emails (all except his)….Broken

- I will demand human rights for China and Tibet…….Broken

- I will put legislation on Internet for all to read before votes….Broken

- I will have honest advisers, except those who take free rent……Broken

- I will have my administration pay their fair share of taxes……..Broken

- I will eliminate rendition of terrorist combatants (executive order allows the CIA to kidnap, torture and assassinate even Americans)……Broken

- I will have a transparent admin. with the media (White House Press Corps kept in the dark) …….Broken

- I will bring charges against Bush admin for war crimes…..Broken

- I will have new blood in admin. (Keeps Secretary of Defense Gates, names Panetta to CIA, appoints Iraq war General David Petraeus as top commander in Afghanistan, appoints Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State)……….Broken

- I will apply windfall taxes on big oil companies…….Broken

- I will change US Foreign Policy, (appoints criminal Hillary Clinton as Sec. State) ……Broken

- I will change the defense department (keeps Gates)………..Broken

- I will close Guantanamo (authorized the illegal trial of a child soldier. Charged with crimes that the United States government is guilty of)…….Broken

- I will sit down with dictators with no pre-conditions……Broken

- I will stop waterboarding and CIA interrogation techniques…..Broken

- I will use federal campaign funds…..Broken

- I will get US troops out of Iraq in 16 month……Broken

- I will not hire lobbyists (hired lobbyist Daschle, * Melody Barnes, lobbyist for American Civil Liberties Union, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, the American Constitution Society and the Center for Reproductive Rights , * William Corr, lobbyist for Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, * Patrick Gaspard, lobbyist for Service Employees International Union. * David Hayes, lobby San Diego Gas & Electric. * Eric Holder, attorney general nominee, lobbyist for bankrupt Global Crossing telecommications. * Ron Klain, lobbyist for Asbestos Resolution, U.S. Airways, Airborne Express and drug-maker ImClone. * William Lynn, lobbyist for Raytheon. * Cecilia Munoz, lobbyist for National Council of La Raza * Mark Patterson, lobbyist for Goldman Sachs. * Mona Sutphen, lobbyist for Angliss International. * Michael Strautmanis, lobbied for the American Association of Justice. * Tom Vilsack, lobbyist for NEA.) ….Broken

- I will eliminate Bush tax cuts… .Broken

- I will dump Patriot Act wire tapping…….Broken

- I will eliminate tax breaks for wealthy………Broken

Judicial Watch - DC’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2009

7. President Barack Obama: During his presidential campaign, President Obama promised to run an ethical and transparent administration. However, in his first year in office, the President has delivered corruption and secrecy, bringing Chicago-style political corruption to the White House. Consider just a few Obama administration “lowlights” from year one: Even before President Obama was sworn into office, he was interviewed by the FBI for a criminal investigation of former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich’s scheme to sell the President’s former Senate seat to the highest bidder. (Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and slumlord Valerie Jarrett, both from Chicago, were also tangled up in the Blagojevich scandal.)

Moreover, the Obama administration made the startling claim that the Privacy Act does not apply to the White House. The Obama White House believes it can violate the privacy rights of American citizens without any legal consequences or accountability. President Obama boldly proclaimed that “transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency,” but his administration is addicted to secrecy, stonewalling far too many of Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act requests and is refusing to make public White House visitor logs as federal law requires.

The Obama administration turned the National Endowment of the Arts (as well as the agency that runs the AmeriCorps program) into propaganda machines, using tax dollars to persuade “artists” to promote the Obama agenda. According to documents uncovered by Judicial Watch, the idea emerged as a direct result of the Obama campaign and enjoyed White House approval and participation.

President Obama has installed a record number of “czars” in positions of power. Too many of these individuals are leftist radicals who answer to no one but the president. And too many of the czars are not subject to Senate confirmation (which raises serious constitutional questions). (US Constitution, Article 1 Section 9: “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.” A czar is a title used to designate certain monarchs or supreme rulers - in other words is a title of nobility.)

Under the President’s bailout schemes, the federal government continues to appropriate or control—through fiat and threats—large sectors of the private economy, prompting conservative columnist George Will to write: “The administration’s central activity—the political allocation of wealth and opportunity—is not merely susceptible to corruption, it is corruption.”

Government-run health care and car companies, White House coercion, uninvestigated ACORN corruption, debasing his office to help Chicago cronies, attacks on conservative media and the private sector, unprecedented and dangerous new rights for terrorists, perks for campaign donors—this is Obama’s “ethics” record.

For many decades, the myth that Ultra violet (UV) rays bring only harm to our health remained a strong belief held by people everywhere in the world. Recent scientific studies, however, demanded a change in this perspective. The benefits of UV light have a wide variety of applications - including health, beauty and sterilization. Although the idea sounds rather surprising, a good amount of clinical research backs up the claim that sun rays do some essential good.

The importance of sunlight (natural UV)

On this planet we have to have the full spectrum of sunlight to live. This is how we evolved as a species. Sunlight is not just a bright light; it is part of the electromagnetic spectrum, best described as a rainbow. These 1,200 frequencies of light all act on some part of your body. They power the cells, regulate your biological clock and produce hormones in your body; they affect your metabolism; they give you the equivalent of vitamin C and vitamin D. When you’re not getting enough light, all these functions start diminishing, and cause depression of your immune system. We need these frequencies on an ongoing basis.

Your body needs 30 minutes of sunlight a day. Two hours a day is ideal. However, in 48 hours all the energy you receive from the sun is depleted. The best thing to do when you have long cloudy periods when the sun doesn’t come through is to use full spectrum light bulbs. A full spectrum light is the closest thing we have to real sunlight. Using a full spectrum light for about six hours a day is equivalent to 30 minutes of sunlight.

UV-B has the ability to break cellular structure and eventually mutate it. Because of that property, UV-B is used in many hospitals to sterilize tools and equipment. In humans, UV-B has been proven to help treat certain diseases like tuberculosis and psoriasis. In 1903, a Nobel Price was awarded to Niels Finsen for treating skin lesions caused by tuberculosis with UV light. In a study conducted recently, it was discovered that 80 percent of people suffering from psoriasis improved after being exposed to UV light.

During the winter months, your normal incandescent and fluorescent lighting causes hyperactivity, stress and eyestrain. Incandescent light puts out a yellow-orange frequency, and your body becomes overdosed with this. You crave carbohydrates, you sleep longer, your menstrual cycles change, you get irritable and depressed. As the amount of sun (UV) that we absorb is reduced, our immune system drops accordingly and we catch more colds and flu. Lack of ultraviolet (UV) during the winter is the single biggest reason for depression, colds and flu.

Ninety-eight per cent of sunlight enters through the eyes, and 2% through the skin. The 2% on the skin is important because that is the only way your body can develop vitamin D which is essential for calcium production to make strong bones and strong teeth.

The windows in your home or car will block 100 % of ultraviolet light. Roll the windows down if you can. There is plenty of documented proof that blocking the sun’s UV light is the root cause of seasonal depression. People with seasonal depression, are those who are in an office building all day, who take their car out of the garage of the building, never roll down the windows, turn their air-conditioning or heaters on, park in their garage at home, get out and go in the house. Where and when did they get their needed sun UV exposure that day? They didn’t.

If you are wearing glasses, sunglasses or contacts, 100% of ultraviolet light is being blocked. Ultraviolet does not come through glass or plastic, so if you are paying for any kind of UV protection in your lenses, it’s a waste of money. The artificial lenses that doctors insert after cataract operations will also block all the ultraviolet. Your eyes actually needs UV exposure from the sun to remain healthy. Cataract for as a result of lack of sun exposure. People who live their entire lives indoors, like the elderly and office workers, develop cataracts. And what is the first optometrist recommendation for seniors with cataracts? They advise them to always wear sunglasses which actually worsens their affliction. Seniors spend very little time outdoors, especially in the winter months, and by advising them to wear sunglasses when they do go out, they are robbing themselves of the very important sun UV rays.

How light travels in your body

Light enters your body primarily through your eyes and follows two pathways, each of which has a different effect: (i) The visual pathway, which enables you to see, is the upper pathway, which goes up to the cortex. If you’re blind, that pathway may be blocked, but the lower pathway continues to function. (ii) The lower pathway goes to the hypothalamus gland, an extremely important gland in the distribution of sunlight to the rest of your body.

The hypothalamus gland controls all the other glands. It also regulates your circadian rhythms, telling you whether it is day or night, June or December. The significance of this is that it instructs the pineal gland to produce the appropriate hormones. During the night, your pineal gland produces melatonin and you should get about eight hours of darkness. When you are in daylight, or sunlight, those same glands produce serotonin. In a normal day you usually receive eight hours of melatonin and 16 hours of serotonin. During the winter months you experience more darkness, so your body secretes more and more melatonin, throwing your body out of balance and creating those conditions mentioned above, especially the craving to sleep more. So giving a person who has seasonal depression melatonin will make it worse because their body is already producing too much melatonin. Don’t take melatonin during the winter unless you have a specific sleeping disorder. Full sun UV light will also regulate your melatonin and serotonin.

The hypothalamus has another important duty and that is converting light to chemical electrical pulses that follow the nervous system in the body, providing energy to every cell in your body. Your cells require nutrients from foods, and oxygen from the air, but what ignites energy in the cell is light. Sunlight is the spark plug, which provides the spark in cells to produce protein, and to replicate and repair. This is the mechanism of sunlight in the body. It regulates the body clock; it produces the hormones in your body and it produces the energy that goes to the cells, so it’s very important that good natural sunlight enters your eyes.

There are three types of ultraviolet: A, B and C. People can get a sunburn during overcast skies because although the cloud layer blocks the A and B, ultraviolet C still comes through, and the C is what does the burning. Ultraviolet A and B are essential to your body, and unfortunately, these are the ones which are blocked. The cloud layers will also block a great many of the sunlight frequencies. The entire intensity of sunlight is diminished, as you know, when there are overcast skies. The ozone layer blocks UVC, which is very caustic. The cornea of the eye also blocks UVC, and the lens and the retina of the eye block the other two ultraviolets. So we have our own regulatory system going on in our eye on normal amounts of UV. When we use sunglasses, we completely block off the two good ones.

Effects of artificial incandescent and fluorescent lighting

John Ott, who was a pioneer in analyzing the effects of artificial light on the human body was Walt Disney’s time-lapse photographer. That is how he discovered the effect of light on plants and people. He found that fluorescent lights which were heavily skewed to the blue side of the spectrum caused virtually all male offspring in test animals; whereas if the fluorescent lighting was skewed to the red side of the spectrum, it resulted in primarily all female offspring. He also showed that six major types of fluorescent lights being used at that time caused a significantly higher mutation rate in offspring (mutated genes and birth defects), and he was responsible for causing those six types of fluorescents to be banned from the country. If light has that effect on reproduction in test animals, what impact is light having on you?

Both an incandescent and a fluorescent light produce a yellow frequency. The incandescent light (that is, the ordinary light bulb) is high in the yellow, orange and red frequencies, and this makes your eyes squint because the yellow frequency of the light bulb is the single worst frequency for the eye. It was developed because it was the brightest of all the colours, and it reaches the cones first, but it also causes the eye to contract. In addition, the yellow that hits exposed skin causes a contraction in the muscles and the nerves. The yellow that comes from fluorescent and incandescent lights causes a low-grade stress condition in your body all the time. The cool white fluorescent is even higher in yellow. You will notice these lights have a yellow tinge in comparison with a full spectrum light. You will feel better if you actually keep a full spectrum light on in the general vicinity of your regular lighting.

When you read under an incandescent or fluorescent light, the yellow does not absorb into the paper, and it becomes glare. This glare from regular incandescent lights actually is what puts you into reading glasses earlier. The full spectrum is white. It has no glare, and the letters stand out. Basically you can read for hours on end under a full spectrum without even squinting or eyestrain. With regular lights, I start rubbing my eyes after about 20 minutes. Sodium lights are bad also. They also give out a yellow basis.

Halogen lights also produce a yellow frequency. If an incandescent light is a bad light, a halogen is a very bright bad light. Halogen lights were initially created without glass to protect them, and they produced more ultraviolet than any other device.

Problems with fluorescent lights

Fluorescent lights have the wrong light frequencies (or colour). Radiation in the form of soft X-rays escapes out the ends of the tube. This causes a slow clustering of blood cells and restriction in oxygen flow which makes you drowsy. The only way to shield the radiation is to put lead tape on the ends of the tube. You can obtain small pieces of lead tape from security companies who use lead tape around the windows. The third problem with fluorescent lights is pulsation or flicker, and that occurs not from the bulb, but from the fixture itself. The fixture pulsates 60 times a second - 60 Hertz, 120 power. By changing the power supply in the fixture to an electronic one, it will pulsate at 25,000 times a second and you will get no flicker. All the new type of fluorescents are flicker free, 25,000 electronic ballast.

Cure for seasonal depression, all influenza flu viruses and diseases.

If you have severe seasonal depression, you should be using the UV lighting, and you should replace them after every third winter season, because the UV will deteriorate. The UV lighting will have most effect if it is used first thing in the morning. If you put a screw-in UV bulb in your bathroom, that is the first light you will use in the morning, and it will stop the melatonin production right away. So basically, that is the least expensive way to treat seasonal depression.

Full spectrum (UV) bulbs are generally available in plant stores and pet stores because they never use anything but full spectrum lights on all their plants and animals. They are treated better than humans.

Full spectrum (UV) light provides sunlight indoors, reduces eyestrain when reading and counteracts drowsiness and prevents most of the diseases and viruses that inflict us as a result of lack of natural sunlight (UV) exposure. The artificially created radiation coming out of fluorescent tubes causes drowsiness. Fluorescent tubes are identical to your computer screen and your TV screen. Therefore, your computer screen is doing the same thing to you.

Substituting one bad light with another.

A new law is set to ban the sale of incandescent light bulbs, due to concerns about energy costs and greenhouse gases. Yet, light bulb manufacturers admit that the typical compact fluorescents that governments are pushing for are at best a temporary fix, because they contain the very toxic and cancer causing mercury, emit hazardous EMFs, and no recycling centers will accept them. The government is substituting a alleged power hungry incandescent light bulb with no toxin and can be disposed of safely for a very toxic poisoning and environmentally unfriendly compact fluorescents. Instead our government should be replace your incandescent bulbs with healthy full spectrum light bulbs - light bulbs that brings nature’s healing UV sunlight indoors to you.

With all of the dubious gadgets and toxic sprays marketed today shining an ultraviolet light on something is the safest way to kill germs. Ultraviolet light is actually an extremely effective germicide, able to kill more than 99 percent of germs. Ultraviolet lamps are used in sewage treatment plants, hospital clean rooms and many other areas where killing bacteria, viruses and spores is crucial. Combined with good housekeeping and duct maintenance, an ultraviolet system can help to ensure that your household air supply is as sanitary as possible. Why use toxic deodorizers, cleaning sprays or liquid cleansers in your home when ultraviolet light, preferably natural, is safer, 100% less toxic, more environmentally friendly and kills 99% of germs that causes odors and sickness.

There is no need to irradiate any of our naturally produced foods including all vegetables, fruits and eggs. There are 2 readily available and inexpensive products already on store shelves that kills germs and bacteria , including E-coli and salmonella. These inexpensive baking ingredients, always at hand, are an excellent alternative to a number of commercial cleaning and maintenance products. Best of all they are 100% natural and 100% free of any harmful chemicals and toxins.

Conventional cleaners, drain cleaners, disinfectants, and deodorizers are full of chemicals harmful to the environment and dangerous to our own health, including concerns about childhood development, asthma at all ages, and increased risks for cancer.

The 2 readily available and inexpensive products already on store shelves that kills germs and bacteria , including E-coli and salmonella are baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) and white vinegar. They are nature’s perfect cleaning products.

Long before the advent of commercial cleaning products, simple household items, such as baking soda and white vinegar, were the most commonly used cleansers. Unlike many commercial cleansers which contain perfumes to mask odors, baking soda actually eliminates odors. Baking soda has the ability to neutralize odors caused by bacteria and germs in your home. The miracle of baking soda, or sodium bicarbonate, is in its ability to neutralize pH levels. That is, it takes strong acids and buffers (it was popularly used as an antacid before the Tums and Rolaids people took over the market), and, while slightly on the base side itself, also stabilizes the pH of highly basic solutions. You got a bad odour? It’s almost always the result of strong acids (in the fridge, often lactic acids) or bases (found in in spoiled meats).

As a cleanser:

Baking soda is mildly abrasive, but doesn’t scratch surfaces. That means you can use it like a scouring powder for pots and pans, stove burners, ovens, grills, sinks and tubs, toilets, and anywhere you have a stubborn spot or stain, without worrying about damaging the finish. Baking soda makes a good cleanser for plastic bowls, too, which other abrasive cleaners would easily scratch.

As a washing solution:

Baking soda and water make a great all-around cleaning solution for just about anything that ever needs to be cleaned! Mix about 4 tablespoons to a quart of water. Use it on floors, walls, woodwork, countertops, cupboards, the refrigerator and most of all, the garbage pail! The only caution would be its use on upholstery or rugs. Make a color test first because it may not be color-safe for some materials.

As a laundry agent:

Add 1/2 cup of baking soda to your laundry detergent to freshen, deodorize and combat yellowing of fabrics. For whites, add baking soda to your laundry to boost the whitening action of bleach while at the same time neutralizing the bleach odor.

Banish mildew:

At first glance mildewed shower curtains seem like a lost cause, but don’t throw them away just yet. First run them through the washing machine, including a couple of towels in the load for weight, and add 1/2 cup baking soda to the detergent and 1 cup of white vinegar to the rinse cycle. Your shower curtains will be clean, fresh and mildew-free.

As a disinfectant:

Run your empty dishwasher with 1/2 cup of baking soda in place of detergent to make it clean and odor-free. If you run your dishwasher once a day, sprinkle a little baking soda over the dishes that are waiting to be washed. This will neutralize any odor build-up.

As a deodorizer:

- Place 1 cup of baking soda in the refrigerator and empty microwave to neutralize food and cooking odors.
- Have you ever taken the lid off a plastic bowl and found a stale odor lingering there? Sprinkle a little baking soda into the bowl and let it sit overnight. When you wash it, your bowl will be odor free.
- For those smokers in the house, sprinkle a little baking soda in the bottom of ashtrays to help counteract the odor.
- Sometimes rugs can get a musty smell, especially if they’re in a basement area. To clear the air, sprinkle baking soda generously over the carpet and let it sit overnight before vacuuming.
- Sprinkle a little baking soda in the bottom of sneakers or other shoes — whew, what a relief!
- Keep yourself and your cat happy by sprinkling a little baking soda into the litter box to keep the odors away.
- For those environmentally conscious parents who use cloth diapers, add 1/2 cup of baking soda to the diaper pail to neutralize odor. If the diaper pail has a liner, sprinkle a little in the pail before you add the liner, then add the rest to the soaking solution.

Fizz it clean with a mixture of baking soda and white vinegar:

Baking soda and white vinegar have been known for centuries as the Dynamic Duo of cleaning. When you combine white vinegar with baking soda, the mixture “fizzes” because the acid in the white vinegar releases the carbon dioxide in the baking soda. This “fizzing” action scrubs the dirt away. A mixture of baking soda and white vinegar kills germs and bacteria including E-coli and salmonella.

Kill harmful bacteria:

- Bacteria, like salmonella, can easily be spread from wooden cutting boards. You can guard against this kind of food poisoning by sprinkling baking soda over the surface of a wet cutting board and pushing the powder down into any cut marks with your fingers. Then spray white vinegar over it (put the white vinegar in a small plastic spray bottle). The resulting fizz will deep clean the cutting board. Rinse with hot water. Repeat this process after you’ve used the board to cut raw meat, especially chicken. This baking soda and white vinegar combination will make your kitchen cleaner, safer place by killing bacteria without exposing yourself and your family to toxic chemicals that can damage your health as well as the environment. It’s a simple safe disinfecting spray you make, very cost effective, and is more effective than any commercial cleaner in killing bacteria. Better than most health food store brands of commercial cleaner too.

If you’re cleaning vegetables or fruit just spritz them well with the white vinegar and water, and then rinse them off under running water. This will kill the E-coli and salmonella and helps to dissolve the wax and pesticide residues found on the skins of many fruits and vegetables. You are suppose to wash every fruit or vegetable before you eat them. Washing them with white vinegar will eliminate the harmful germs and bacteria that are found on every piece of fruit and vegetable. In the store fruits and vegetable are not packaged so they are exposed every day to germs and bacteria. How many have handled the fruit or vegetables you buy? How many are sick when they handle the food you bring home? How many times have you seen people coughing or sneezing while standing over a store display of fruits or vegetables. White vinegar washes away all those harmful germs and bacteria and it does it all 100% free of chemicals and toxins.

For cleaning Hard-skinned Fruits and Vegetables:

1. Fill a spray bottle with equal parts white vinegar and water.
2. Then, spray the solution onto your fruits and vegetables; rub it in; and rinse.

For Soft-skinned Fruits and Vegetables:

1. Fill a bowl with equal parts white vinegar and water.
2. Then, soak your fruits and vegetables in the solution for a minute or two, and rinse.

For store or farm bought eggs:

1. Fill a bowl with equal parts white vinegar and water.
2. Then, soak your eggs in the solution for a minute or two, and rinse. This will kill the E-coli and salmonella on the shell of the egg.

Why This Works? The acetic acid in vinegar kills bacteria and helps to dissolve the wax and pesticide residues found on the skins of many fruits and vegetables.

Benefits of using baking soda and white vinegar

* cheaper than store-bought cleaners and disinfectants
* cleans more effectively than water alone
* all-natural
* no side-effects
* 100% safe for the environment
* 0 toxicity and 0 chemical content
* kills all bacteria, germs, mico-toxins, parasites or, fungal
* washes away pesticide residue
* eliminate germ and bacteria causing odors

Baking soda and white vinegar works exceptionally well in sanitizing counters and other food preparation surfaces–includes wood cutting board. In tests run at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Pairing the two killed virtually all Salmonella, Shigella, or E.Coli Bacteria on heavily contaminated food and surfaces when used in this fashion, making these 2 natural cooking ingredients more effective at killing these potentially lethal bacteria than chlorine bleach or any commercially available kitchen cleaner. White vinegar has been used for centuries to kill any mico-toxin, parasites or, fungal.

Apple cider vinegar kills parasites

Another type of vinegar, Apple cider vinegar, has been used for centuries to kill parasites in the body that cause many different types of diseases. Apple cider vinegar is an immune booster, and immune boosters help fight off parasites, infections and diseases.

Human intestinal parasites worms infection air food water cause constipation, stomach bloating, disease health problems. Other symptoms include anemia, asthma, diarrhea, digestive disorders, fatigue, low immune system, nervousness, skin rash. Most will not face this reality or even want to think about this subject and will continue in their suffering.

There can be over 100 different types of parasites worms living in human bodies. Some are microscopic in size while others can be seen quite easily. These common organisms can be found everywhere in our environment, in the air we breath, in the water we drink, or in the food we eat.

Parasite is an organism that lives on or in other organisms from which it obtains nutrients to live and causes harm in the process. Its name comes from the Greek word para that means beside, and sitos, which means food.

Most parasites require some host to complete their life cycle. Animals can also serve as the host. The parasite will vary in size from one-thousandth of one micron to whale tapeworms one hundred feet long.

Parasites and worms can invade your bodies through food and water intake, through transmitting agents (like mosquito), sexual conduct or through the nose and skin. Once established, they will eat the same foods you eat or they will eat you.

People with intestinal parasite infections are usually under-nourished and weak, infected with viral, fungal, or bacteria, and have various types of chemical and metal poisoning. Human intestinal parasites can be present in any disease, in any person, at any age.

They are responsible for many health problems because they secrete toxins and steal the vital nutrients from our bodies. They can irritate or exaggerate other health problems you may be experiencing. Everyone is at risk and under their mercy during parasitic infections.

We create the perfect living environment for parasites when the bowel becomes ineffective in the elimination of our waste products. The build-up of fecal material on the walls of the colon is attributed to constipation and the amounts of junk food, chemicals, bad fats and sweets we consume.

We poison ourselves from our own toxic waste and the waste from these creatures (auto intoxication) when this ideal habitat for is created. Testing for parasites are only available for about five percent of the known varieties with twenty-percent accuracy.

Cancer cases are afflicted with worms that often lump together and look like tumors. Female worms can release 3,000 to 200,000 eggs per day depending on their type. This is one topic that most people do not want to discuss, let alone think about, but now reality must be faced.

These topics are very important for detoxification and your well-being. Most doctors are not trained to recognize the symptoms of parasitic infections. The only way to avoid the problems associated with parasite infections is by educating yourself.

Parasite infections can cause physical trauma by perforating (burrowing) the intestines, the circulatory system, the lungs, the liver or the whole bodies.

They can erode, damage or block certain organs by lumping together in balls or tumors. They can be mistaken for cancer tumors, and travel into the brain, heart and lungs.

They rob us of our vital vitamin and mineral nutrients, and amino acids needed for digestion. Some become anemic (anemia) and are drowsy after meals.

They give off certain metabolic waste products (toxic waste) that poison our bodies. This particular condition is called verminous intoxification. Most have trouble disposing of the toxins that are re-absorbed through the intestines. Your bodies have to work twice as hard to remove these toxic waste products.

Depresses the immune system, which leads to further degeneration, fatigue and illness.

They can destroy cells faster than cells can be regenerated.

Some conditions that promote parasitic infections are excess mucus, an imbalance in the intestinal flora, chronic constipation, and toxic internal environment.

Healthy immune system is the best defense against parasites and disease. Some of the things you can do to reduce the risk of parasitic infections are:

Wash all fruits and vegetables. Scrape off the wax substance on the outer surface on any fruit or vegetable with knife before washing. Anything with nicks or recess can harbor just about anything and should be cut out. Avoid eating grapes with open splits. Washing fruit, vegetables and eggs in a white vinegar and water bath will kill parasites. Rinse well after to remove the vinegar residue.

Thoroughly cook meats and fish. Do not eat raw or uncooked meats or fish. Check for worms, especially on fish. Marinating meat in vinegar kills bacteria and tenderizes the meat. Marinate one kilo of meat with quarter cup of vinegar and your desired herbs. Keep it in the refrigerator, overnight, and cook it the next day.

Keep all work surfaces clean with baking soda and a white vinegar spray.

Drink pure water. Parasites are associated with many water-borne outbreaks and are highly resistant to conventional methods of disinfecting. Water that is properly purified is free of parasites.

Practice good personal hygiene. Wash your hands before eating and after going to the bathroom, changing diapers, or handling pets. Keep your fingernails short and clean. Parasites can live for two months under the fingernails.

High carbohydrate diet, low in protein, and high in alkaline has been found to make parasitic infections worse. Sugar should also be avoided because parasites thrive on it and it is possible you could have candida. This candida or yeast infections create an environment in the colon that equals the environment needed for them to thrive. Foods that lower pH from high alkaline conditions in the colon are apple cider vinegar and cranberry juice.

Another remedy for prevention is mixing one or two teaspoons of apple cider vinegar in one glass of water and drinking it. The documented cures from drinking Apple Cider Vinegar are numerous. They include cures for allergies (including pet, food and environmental), sinus infections, acne, high cholesterol, flu, chronic fatigue, candida, acid reflux, sore throats, contact dermatitis, arthritis, and gout. Apple Cider Vinegar also breaks down fat and is widely used to lose weight. It has also been reported that a daily dose of apple cider vinegar in water can bring high blood pressure under control in two weeks!

Apple Cider Vinegar is also wonderful for pets, including dogs, cats, and horses. It helps them with arthritic conditions, controls fleas & barn flies, and gives a beautiful shine to their coats!

What would you choose to use to kill harmful germs and bacteria in your home? Would you choose to exposure yourself and your family to cleaning products that contain harmful chemicals and toxins or would you choose the 100% natural and 100% effective cleaning and disinfectant products called baking soda and white vinegar?

Bryan Glover, an assistant coach at Grassland Middle School near Nashville, co-wrote the country music song, “When You’re Holding a Hammer, Everything Looks Like a Nail.”

It was co-written by a parent who has a child on the team. Glover, 26, said he emailed a copy of the song to friends, family members and player’s parents through his personal email account.

And that’s when all the trouble started for the self-described independent conservative.

“The coach called me and said parents were upset – that I was being politically incorrect and the song had racial overtones,” Glover told FOX News Radio. “An hour and a half later I was told I was being terminated.”

“I was informed that I was being let go because of the song,” he said, denying claims there were any racial overtones in the song.

Williamson County School Superintendent Mike Looney disputed Glover’s account and said his dismissal had nothing to do with the song.

“Absolutely not,” he told FOX News Radio. “That’s a false claim.”

Looney said he was not allowed to go into specifics but acknowledged he spoke with the school’s principal and was satisfied with their handling of the matter.

“They presented me with logical, legally defensible reasons for doing so,” Looney said. “As far as I’m concerned they’ve handled the matter appropriately.”

Glover said he’s angry over what happened and believes he lost his job because his song was critical of President Obama. And he’s not the only one.

Following are the lyrics to his song:

He was a little man, just turned three
Took the present from his daddy’s hand
A genuine toy hammer
He started beatin’ to beat the band
He hit the floors and the wall, broke a lamp in the hall,
Started swinging at the puppy’s tail
When you’re holding a hammer
Everything looks like a nail.

There’ll be a party come this November
When we’re gonna set things straight
All good people gonna gather ‘round
Gonna show what made this country great
We’ll run off the schemers and backroom dealers
So the Red, White and Blue will prevail
When we’re holding the hammer
When we’re holding the hammer
Everyone of them looks like a nail.

You can listen to the Country Blues song at http://www.holdingahammer.com

The 2006 United States midterm elections were held on Tuesday, November 7, 2006. All United States House of Representatives seats and one third of the United States Senate seats were contested in this election, as well as 36 state governorships, many state legislatures, four territorial legislatures and many state and local races. The election resulted in a sweeping victory for the Democratic Party which captured the House of Representatives, the Senate, and a majority of governorships and state legislatures from the Republican Party.

The Democrats winning control of the House of Representatives, the Senate, and a majority of governorships and state legislatures coincides with the United States economic crisis. It is during these past 4 years that the US National Debt has skyrocketed, unemployment numbers has skyrocketed, $trillions of US taxpayer dollars have been given to Wall Street banks in the form of bank bonuses, the US was intentionally infected with the A-H1N1 virus so that Obama could reform health care, record numbers of Americans have been forced into bankruptcy and home foreclosures, the government has expanded their wars of aggression into Pakistan and the US Democratic government has used the environmental weather modifying weapon called HAARP against foreign states - all resulting in massive financial loses, extreme hardships and massive casualties in the United States and in foreign states.

On November 2, 2010 its time to vote for a CHANGE in Congress. It time to stop the looting of the people’s money by Obama and his Democratic mobsters. It is time to stop the use of the WMD called HAARP against the United States people and foreign states. It is time to end the corruption in Washington DC. It is time to indict the bankers of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank for their crimes of money laundering, securities fraud, theft, embezzlement and other criminal charges. Its time to take back your inalienable rights and freedoms. Its time to end the secrecy of the White House. It is time to knock Obama off his pedestal.

Why are contaminated eggs being flagged as so dangerous? To answer that, you have to go back to a 2008 story called, “FDA Unleashes Mass Irradiation of Spinach, Lettuce and Other Vegetables” There the FDA demands that spinach and lettuce be irradiated. Irradiation is the process by which an item is exposed to radiation. Some consumer groups complain that widespread irradiation of food after processing would simply cover up the food industry’s hygiene problems. And some advocacy groups question the long-term safety of irradiation.

Food and Water Watch, an advocacy group, has long maintained that irradiation would be too expensive, impractical and sometimes ineffective because it might hide filthy conditions at food processing plants. Patty Lovera, the group’s assistant director, said irradiation not only kills bacteria but can also destroy nutrients in food.

The FDA won’t stop with spinach and lettuce, either. They’re already talking about irradiating tomatoes, peppers and onions. Before long, radiation could become mandatory for ALL fresh produce…”

It’s already happened with almonds, which must now be fumigated or pasteurized in the United States — a punitive rule that has severely damaged the U.S. almond industry. That took place after a mild outbreak of contamination with almonds. Similarly, this recent egg contamination fiasco is giving the FDA precisely the excuse it needs to demand pasteurization or irradiation of all eggs - which will destroy all of its nutritional value like they did with milk.

The FDA is seizing upon each contamination event as a leverage point from which to ratchet up its food sterilization agenda, and the agency won’t stop until every piece of fresh food sold at grocery stores is either pasteurized, fumigated or irradiated.

Only then will the FDA’s true agenda of food control be fully realized. This plan involves outlawing all raw milk, raw almonds, raw spinach, raw eggs and anything else that might be living. Hence the recent ramping up of criminal arrests and prosecutions against raw milk producers and living food coops.

The only safe food is dead food according to the FDA. And they’re going to make sure your food is as dead as possible by exploiting these hyped-up food emergencies as leverage points from which to assert their “dead foods agenda.”

The punch line to all this should be obvious by now: Dead foods lead to dead people. When a population is denied access to health-enhancing living foods (raw foods), its health begins to deteriorate. This of course create a financial windfall for the pharmaceutical industry that thrives on suffering and disease.

In other words, keeping the food sterilized means keeping the people diseased. And keeping the people diseased means keeping the sick-care industry rolling in easy cash. There’s nothing like a little sickness to remind people to keep taking their pills, get vaccinated and see your doctor on a regular bases so that he can misdiagnose your seasonal flu as a deadly swine flu or some other kind of lab created influenza virus, declare you are diabetic when in fact your body is just reacting to all of the hyper amounts of sugar, chemicals and toxins in your diets from eating processed foods, toxic sodas and junk food.

This FDA egg recall has nothing to do with protecting the health of consumers. It has everything to do with making sure more and more people become sick. It is the FDA way of keeping the government’s health care system from flat lining.

Safe foods can be produced without irradiation. The problems of Salmonella in poultry must be handled by monitoring the poultry feed, by hygienic measures of poultry plants and last but not least hygienic measures in the kitchen.

Despite what the FDA claims irradiated products and free radicals which are created by irradiation are harmful and toxic. Free radicals are scientifically proven contributors to many different diseases. These free radical molecules, which irradiation creates, rapidly react with other molecules, setting off a chain reaction of free radical formation, somewhat similar to an atomic explosion. So now we have this molecule which is missing an electron and is dying to get its hands on an electron to help fill its need. This free radical now goes and steals an electron from another molecule that is more willing to give one up and thus it becomes satisfied, but now the victim molecule has become a free radical! This goes on for quite some time. We therefore call this process the chain reaction of free radicals.

Cell membranes are made of unsaturated lipids. The unsaturated lipid molecules of cell membranes are particularly susceptible to this damaging free radicals process and readily contribute to the uncontrolled chain reaction. Oxidative damage, another name for the chemical reaction that free radicals cause, can lead to a breakdown or even hardening of lipids, which makeup all cell walls. If the cell wall is hardened (lipid peroxidation) then it becomes impossible for the cell to properly get its nutrients, get signals from other cells to perform an action (such as firing of a neuron) and many other cellular activities can be affected. In addition to the cell walls, other biological molecules are also susceptible to damage, including RNA, DNA and protein enzymes.

The primary site of free radical damage is the DNA found in the mitochondria. Mitochondria are small membrane-enclosed regions of a cell which produce the chemicals a cell uses for energy. Mitochondria are the “energy factory” of the cell. Every cell contains an enormous set of molecules called DNA which provide chemical instructions for a cell to function.

This DNA is found in the nucleus of the cell, which serves as the “command center” of the cell, as well as in the mitochondria. The cell automatically fixes much of the damage done to nuclear DNA. However, the DNA in the mitochondria cannot be readily fixed.

Therefore, extensive DNA damage accumulates over time and shuts down mitochondria, causing the cells to die and the organism to age.

Hence, this free radical generation process can disrupt all levels of cell function. This is why free radical damage is thought to be such a basic mechanism of tissue injury. It damages us at the cellular level.

Free radicals are increased in activity and quantity by bumping into toxic metals in the body. Thus, toxic metals are a cause of free radicals. Several hundred years ago we did NOT have the burden of toxic metals in our bodies that we now do, and we also did not have such an exposure to free radicals. If you remove the toxic metals from the body, you then greatly reduce the activity and the number of free radicals.

It is also clear that environmental agents initiate free radical problems. The toxicity of lead, pesticides, cadmium, ionizing radiation (irradiation), alcohol and cigarette smoke may all be due to their free radical initiating ability.

Now let’s talk about heart disease and free radicals. Heart disease is NOT caused by eating butter and eggs. The traditional view has been that when you ate butter and eggs and other foods high in cholesterol, you increase the amount of cholesterol in your blood stream. This is false. Dietary cholesterol does not increase blood cholesterol. Then, this excessive cholesterol would build up on the inner lining of the artery. Again, this is false. Next, the traditional view goes that cholesterol attracts particles of calcium floating along in the blood stream, building up a sort of sandwich of cholesterol - calcium - cholesterol - calcium - cholesterol. This is the traditional view.

It is safe to say that fewer and fewer researchers believe that high levels of fat or cholesterol in the diet are the primary cause of heart disease. An exception to this may be researchers who work for companies which offer high-priced cholesterol-lowering medications.

The actual cause of heart disease is damage done by free radicals to individual cells within the arteries. This free radical damage cannot be prevented or cured by any drugs - in fact most drugs are sources of MORE free radicals in the body.

To combat the free radical chain propagation effect, the body uses antioxidants (chemical electron sinks) which quench the biochemical fire. The antioxidants include enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase, catalase and superoxide dismutase. Vitamin C, vitamin E, and A, beta carotene and coenzyme Q10. Where are antioxidants found. Antioxidants are found only in the unprocessed foods we eat such as vegetables, fruits, grain cereals, eggs, meat, legumes and nuts. Yes eggs. The FDA wants to irradiate eggs and every natural antioxidant - natural antioxidants that acts as “free radical scavengers” and prevents and repairs damage done by these free radicals. Do you see the FDA agenda?

A new study has revealed startling statistics about the number of people killed each year in U.S. hospitals. An estimated 195,000 American are killed by hospital errors and negligence. This is evidence showing just how dangerous it is to be in a hospital. It is often stated that a hospital is the most dangerous place to be, and 195,000 people each year would no doubt agree with that statement. In comparison the 2009 WHO A-H1N1 flu pandemic claimed about 18,500 lives worldwide. On June 11, 2009, the WHO declared the A-H1N1 the first flu pandemic of the 21st century. A CDC study found that during the 1990s, flu-related deaths ranged from an estimated 17,000 during the mildest season to 52,000 during the most severe season (36,000 average). Studies going back to 1976 have found that flu-related deaths ranged from a low of 4,700 to a high of 56,600 (average 25,500). During a regular flu season, about 90 percent of deaths occur in people 65 years and older.

So why are so many more people dying each year from hospital errors and negligence than from seasonal or pandemic flu virus outbreaks? What’s causing all of these deaths in the first place? The majority of deaths are caused by the administering of prescription drugs to patients. CDC studies have shown alarmingly high error rates, where health care personnel give the wrong prescriptions to the wrong patients in the wrong way, and have administered fatal doses of prescription drugs after they were ordered to do so by a physician. There is another less publicized major cause of death in hospitals. That is the drugs themselves. There are so many different kinds of new drugs on the market these days. Many have never been properly tested and many contain deadly toxins and adjuvants that cause very severe and life threatening side effects and death.

A recent study on the 2009 A-H1N1 pandemic reveals that the majority of deaths associated with the virus were actually the result of errors in the diagnoses and the adverse side effects of the vaccines and drugs administered to treat the mild swine flu virus. Too many physicians wrongfully diagnosed the seasonal flu as being the A-H1N1 virus and because of this error in diagnoses they administered the Swine Flu vaccine which caused their patient to get sick and even die.

European governments tested the American made vaccines and found they illegally contain the live H1N1 virus. They concluded that the vaccine was making more people sick than from the natural transmission of the virus. Some have even declared that the vaccine was the means to which the virus spread World wide and for that reason Poland was the only European country to not vaccinate their people against the US lab created A-H1N1 virus. In 2009 more people died as the result of being vaccinated than those who actually had and lived through the virus infection without treatment. In 2009 people who were admitted to hospitals in the United States and Canada were given the A-H1N1 vaccine by the attending doctor even if they were admitted for bone fractures, burns, automobile accidents or any number of other non life threatening. None exhibited any signs of having been infected by the virus. People who had admitted themselves to the hospital for bone fractures were unnecessarily vaccinated and became sick and even died. To cover up the hospital’s error the hospital recorded the cause of death as either cardiac arrest (declared side effect of the vaccine), complications (another side effect of the vaccine), or Anaphylactic shock (yet another declared side effect of the vaccine).

These reports and studies reveal that the modern medical system they have in the United States is extremely risky for patients. Prescription drugs (prescribed by a very well paid family physician) alone kill 100,000 people a year, and over-the-counter medications (pharmaceutically made drugs that are mass produced using varies chemical and toxins combinations that don’t require a doctor’s prescription) kill another 40,000. Now with the CDC study we know that hospital malpractice (the CDC calls them errors) kill another 195,000 people each year. In all, this makes almost 350,000 people each year who are killed (as apposed to dying of natural causes) by modern medicine. And that’s all according to statistics compiled by the medical establishment!

No one is calling for an investigation of the pharmaceutical companies for killing 100,000 people each year. The FDA stands by as if on the sidelines, watching all of this without much alarm. Yes, the agency has mandated the bar coding of prescription drugs in hospitals to help reduce prescription drug errors, but when those prescription drugs cause fatalities even when prescribed and administered correctly, bar coding doesn’t solve the source of the problem in the first place. The real problem with our modern medical system is that it relies on drugs and surgery to treat practically everything, and these limited strategies are inherently dangerous and will inevitably cause fatalities, as is now being shown in numerous studies just like this one.

If we had a national health care system that was based on prevention, nutrition, physical exercise, and consultation with patients rather than surgical procedures and prescription drugs, we would have far fewer deaths, and in fact, great improvements in the longevity and happiness of patients. Costs would plummet, and hospitals could be transformed into places of healing rather than the morgue.

Solutions for a broken system

A program to gradually deregulate medicine would put an end to rising health care costs and solve the health care crisis. The American Medical Association (AMA) should continue to certify and approve medical schools and hospitals but they should be operated privately without the coercive power of the federal government to protect it from competition. Other medical organizations and other medical professionals should be allowed to compete with the AMA for provision of health care, certification of medical schools and hospitals, and licensing of physicians.

Deregulation of medicine would encourage the use of lower cost alternatives to physician-administered health care. We are currently forced to see physicians, many with a quarter of a million dollars worth of medical education, for even routine ailments. Using physicians assistants and nurse practitioners for basic health care and allowing them to operate health care clinics would dramatically reduce medical costs. Allowing midwives, chiropractors, pharmacists and other physician substitutes to have a greater role in health care would also help to lower health care costs.

A commonly held fear is that deregulating medicine might lower costs but would lead to substandard hospitals, quack doctors and shoddy medical care. Those same fears about declining quality were common prior to deregulation of the airline and transportation industries and have been shown to be completely unfounded.

Re-establishing direct payment for medical services through programs like medical savings accounts would restore cost consciousness on behalf of consumers. When medical services are paid for directly, consumers behave much differently than when payment is made by a third party. Direct payment encourages consumer to: 1) ask about prices and shop around for the best value, 2) be prudent about the amount of health care they purchase, and 3) seek medical treatment from nurse practitioners, physicians assistants, midwives or other low cost alternatives to physician care. Direct payment would serve to control medical costs by making consumers fully aware of all costs of health care.

It has been excess government intervention and regulation that has created the current health care crisis in the United States. The US needs to decrease the role of government by restoring competition in health care with market solutions, not increase the role of government with socialized medicine. Deregulation of medicine, like deregulation of trucking, railroad, and airlines, would result in lower prices and higher quality service. The health care crisis would evaporate in the light of market competition.

How will we know when deregulation of medicine has gone far enough? When medicine becomes so competitive that doctors are once again willing to make house calls. House calls would dramatically lower the number of people dying by going to the hospital. Bringing back doctor house calls would benefit everyone.

Doctor’s house calls provide an outstanding primary care. You don’t waste time in a waiting room. You can get acute care, avoiding the ER or urgent care “clinic. You get a timely appointment with your doctor. Especially beneficial for those who can’t get out of the house, or feel too sick to drive. House calls provides the ultimate privacy and personalized attention. But, best of all you avoid exposure to other sick people.

House calls would stop the spread of all contagious influenza viruses. If patient zero for the A-H1N1 virus had stayed home and called for a doctor to make a house call the 2009 Swine Flu pandemic would never have been declared. The CDC is suppose to quarantine any person who they suspect is inflected with a highly contagious disease or virus. For the 2009 Swine Flu outbreak, the CDC failed to follow standard procedure and protocol. Why? The US government orders the CDC into action. By not following standard procedure for containment of the Swine Flu virus the CDC was following the orders of the Obama administration and allowed the virus to spread. The day the news broke that the first case of Swine Flu had been confirmed (Marc S Griswold) by the CDC was when the CDC was suppose to quarantine everyone who came in contact with that person. They did not. They allowed Griswold to travel back from Mexico to the US on an International commercial airline. His plane landed in one of the busiest International airports in the United States - Washington Dulles International Airport. Dulles is served by nearly a dozen U.S.flagged carriers and nearly two dozen international carriers. Airlines serving Dulles provide non-stop service to over 80 domestic destinations and to over 40 international destinations. The CDC was either grossly negligent or a willing conspirator in spreading the A-H1N1 virus World wide. Had there been a quarantine in effect neither charges would be applicable. Had there been a doctor house call health care system in effect in the US, thousands, perhaps millions, of American would still be alive today.

Surprisingly, in spite of ‘bad press’ raw eggs, organic or at least from a known source of healthy free-range chickens, are an excellent health tonic. The regular consumption of raw eggs will do wonders for your overall health. Exceptionally easy to digest, raw eggs provide a wonderful boost to the immune system, and a completely balanced nutritional package. A good immune system is one of several things the body needs to overcome cancer.

Many people’s diets are deficient in high quality proteins and fats, and eggs are one the very best sources of these. Raw eggs have many benefits, they contain essential nutrients for the brain, nerves, glands and hormones, they are nutritionally balanced, and are a highly recommended addition to your nutritional programme. The sulphur amino acids help to keep you young, raw eggs also contain an abundance of other vital substances including protein, essential fatty acids along with niacin, riboflavin, biotin, choline, vitamins A, D and E, magnesium, potassium, phosphorous, manganese, iron, iodine, copper, zinc and sulphur. Egg yolks are one of the few foods that contain vitamin D.

Poisoning from salmonella has been exaggerated in the past. A study by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in 2002 indicated that only 2.3 million, of the 69 billion eggs produced annually, are contaminated with salmonella. In other words 0.003% or 1 in every 30,000 eggs. The bulk of these come from battery chicken eggs and chickens kept in unhealthy conditions - only sick chickens lay salmonella contaminated eggs. If only healthy chicken eggs (organic and free range ideally) are consumed, then far less than one in 30,000 eggs are contaminated. Salmonella is a common micro-organism found almost everywhere, and is just as likely, or more likely, to proliferate on cooked food kept in the fridge. Infection is normally mild gastric symptoms, but in rare cases where the immune system is very low such in the elderly who have had much anti-biotic use, and the source is greatly contaminated, death can result. But such a person is highly lightly to contract one of many common micro-organisms and die from that. To give some perspective, in the highly unusual situation of contracting Salmonella, in a healthy person, an infection is nothing to worry about and is easily treated with high quality pro-biotics every half an hour until you feel better.

1. Eggs are great for the eyes. According to one study, an egg a day may prevent macular degeneraton due to the carotenoid content, specifically lutein and zeaxanthin. Both nutrients are more readily available to our bodies from eggs than from other sources.

2. In another study, researchers found that people who eat eggs every day lower their risk of developing cataracts, also because of the lutein and zeaxanthin in eggs.

3. One egg contains 6 grams of high-quality protein and all 9 essential amino acids.

4. According to a study by the Harvard School of Public Health, there is no significant link between egg consumption and heart disease. In fact, according to one study, regular consumption of eggs may help prevent blood clots, stroke, and heart attacks.

5. They are a good source of choline. One egg yolk has about 300 micrograms of choline. Choline is an important nutrient that helps regulate the brain, nervous system, and cardiovascular system.

6. They contain the right kind of fat. One egg contains just 5 grams of fat and only 1.5 grams of that is saturated fat.

7. New research shows that, contrary to previous belief, moderate consumption of eggs does not have a negative impact on cholesterol. In fact, recent studies have shown that regular consumption of two eggs per day does not affect a person’s lipid profile and may, in fact, improve it. Research suggests that it is saturated fat that raises cholesterol rather than dietary cholesterol.

8. Eggs are one of the only foods that contain naturally occurring vitamin D.

9. Eggs may prevent breast cancer. In one study, women who consumed at least 6 eggs per week lowered their risk of breast cancer by 44%.

10. Eggs promote healthy hair and nails because of their high sulphur content and wide array of vitamins and minerals. Many people find their hair growing faster after adding eggs to their diet, especially if they were previously deficient in foods containing sulphur or B12.

FDA’s salmonella political agenda

With all of these listed benefits of eating both raw and cooked eggs why is the FDA recalling billions of eggs? The reason is the same as the Swine Flu. Terrorism for a political agenda. Last year the World Health Organization and the CDC terrorized the World with fraudulent claims that millions will die from a swine flu virus outbreak. They tried to terrorize the masses into getting vaccinated against a virus that was milder than the seasonal flu virus. The seasonal flu kills more people every year than the exaggerated Swine Flu pandemic. Why did they do this? So that the Obama government could have justification for reforming the health care system in the US.

The United States Army’s Criminal Investigation Command investigated the disappearance of vials of the potentially dangerous virus on April 22, 2009. Their investigation into the missing vials revealed that they were not taken illegally as their removal was authorized by United States president Barack Obama. Obama ordered vials of the A-H1N1 virus be taken from the US biological weapons research lab at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Maryland and transported on an official government aircraft (so it wouldn’t be searched by Mexican authorities as the aircraft has diplomatic immunity), by biological weapons expert Marc S Griswold, to Mexico and dispersed in a pig farming community in Mexico. Obama used terror in order to get his socialists party health reform bill passed. Without a health threat in the United States, the socialists health care bill would not have gotten the votes needed.

The summer of 2010 is now coming to an end so Obama needs another health scare in order to coerce the people of the United Stated to sign up for his socialist state sponsored health care scheme. To date there has only been 2 people who have actually signed up for Obama’s health care scheme. Obama has wasted $billions on a state sponsored health care that no one wants. The numbers declare loud and clear that his bill has failed to get the support of the people. So in order to try and salvage it he is doing what he knows best - terrorism - in order to fulfill his socialist agenda in the United States.

This overblown new salmonella outbreak is nothing new for the Food and Drug administration. Years ago the FDA targeted the milk industry with the same exact health threat - salmonella poisoning. The FDA used a few cases of salmonella poisoning in milk to introduce new legislation that required all farmers to pasteurize their milk before they could sell it to the public. Pasteurization kills carcinogens but it also destroys all of the health benefits that raw milk has.

Pasteurized milk associated with so many health problems

Pasteurizing milk destroys beneficial bacteria along with the bad ones and destroys enzymes essential for nutrient absorption. Pasteurizing milk destroys all its phosphatase; this is essential for the absorption of calcium, and calcium works with Vitamin D, not only available through sunshine but is an essential nutrient in raw cream. Nature packaged a superb design for human sustenance in milk as it comes from the cow with all original essential nutrients — so long as it is not pasteurized. Heating any raw food destroys the active enzymes, so lipase (an enzyme unique to milk and needed to complete digestion of fats) is blasted along with many other essential nutrients that pasteurization destroys. Pasturing milk is the root cause for child obesity. Millions of children who drink pasteurized milk several times a day are obese because the pasteurization destroyed the enzyme that is essential for the complete digestion of fats.

Homogenization is a process that breaks up fat globules in cream into very small particles which then do not separate from the rest of the milk. One of the reasons homogenizing milk became standard processing plant practice is that it allowed cheap Grade C milk (with little cream rising to the top) to be mixed with Grade B and valuable Grade A milk (with lots of cream rising to the top) to all be labeled as Grade A and priced accordingly. There is no known health or nutritional advantage to homogenization and quite a bit of science proving its harm — see The Milk Book, Chapter VII, “Udder Menace” by William Campbell Douglass II, MD. Some research suggests that this fracturing of the lipid (fat) molecule creates a free radical cascade that can cause allergic reactions and, through complex metabolic processes, even heart disease.

The health benefits of raw (unpasteurized) milk was a threat to the FDA and the health care system in the United States. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or USFDA) is an agency of the United States government’s Department of Health and Human Services, one of the United States federal executive departments. The FDA is led by a Commissioner of Food and Drugs, appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. Raw milk made and kept people healthy. Eggs made and kept people healthy. Two of the most important healthy foods threatens the Obama’s socialist Health Care Scheme.

There’s little mention in the mainstream media these days, of traditional foods having healing properties. Sure, there’s a ton of hype touting unfermented soy products, vegetable oils and supplements as modern saviors, but in reality, these items have risk-to-benefit ratios like many drugs do.

Few people are aware that clean, raw milk from grass-fed cows was actually used as a medicine in the early part of the last century. That’s right. Milk straight from the udder, a sort of “stem cell” of foods, was used as medicine to treat, and frequently cure some serious chronic diseases. From the time of Hippocrates to until just after World War II, this “white blood” nourished and healed uncounted millions.

More than 2000 years ago, Hippocrates, often referred to as the father of medicine, promoted the healing effects of milk. Since then, many doctors have continued to do the same. Milk (unpasteurized) is essential to the survival and development of baby mammals, including humans, and even the adult members of traditional tribes such as the Masai and Samburu continue to thrive on significant amounts of it. In addition, anecdotal evidence as well as published research supports its numerous health benefits. Clean raw milk from pastured cows is a complete and properly balanced food. You could live on it exclusively if you had to. If this is the case, then how can milk be associated with so many health problems? One of the most compelling reasons is the difference between pasteurized milk and raw milk. Pasteurization is not the great idea that it’s widely believed to be and because it destroys many of milk’s inherent health benefits, it’s the root cause of most of the diseases that millions are inflicted with today.

Pasteurization destroys essential nutrients and pro biotic microorganisms

Pasteurization was invented by Louis Pasteur in the 1800s and is a process that exposes raw milk to high temperatures for a short duration to destroy pathogens. Unfortunately, it also destroys many of the desirable nutrients and microorganisms that give milk its health promoting benefits. In particular, pasteurization destroys enzymes that contribute to immunity as well as the digestive enzymes needed to digest and assimilate milk’s nutrients. In fact, the test for successful pasteurization is the complete destruction of the enzyme phosphatase. One of the enzymes inactivated by pasteurization is lactase which breaks down the milk sugar lactose. The destruction of this enzyme is an important factor in the high prevalence of lactose intolerance. Pasteurization also destroys a significant amount of the vitamin content in milk including vitamins C, B6, and B12, and it alters the chemical state and absorption of calcium and other minerals.

Another criticism of pasteurization, aside from the fact that it promotes undesirable farming practices, is that it prioritizes the sterilization of milk above the resistance of the person drinking it. One of the important functions of milk is to transfer immunity from mother to baby, and not only does this include the existence of immune supporting compounds, but also the pathogens that cause the initiation of an immune response and the development of antibodies. Pasteurization greatly compromises both of these benefits. While it’s certainly a smart idea to pasteurize low quality milk to reduce the excessive quantity of pathogens, this doesn’t mean that the natural pathogen levels of properly produced raw milk are inherently dangerous. In reality, it’s actually a benefit.

Modern research associates pasteurized milk with a number of allergies and illnesses including asthma, bronchitis, eczema, rheumatoid arthritis, musculoskeletal pain, multiple sclerosis, Lou Gherig’s disease, and even antisocial and aggressive behavior.

Louis Pasteur, the inventor of pasteurization, is well known for his germ theory which attributes the cause of illness and disease to pathogens. This theory is very much alive and well today and continues to be the basis of modern medicine. Despite the popularity of Pasteur’s theory, a well respected scientist of the same era named Claude Bernard disagreed with him. Bernard believed that the “terrain”, which can be interpreted to mean the level of one’s health or physiological function, particularly in regard to the immune system and the balance of intestinal flora, to be the primary factor in preventing illness and disease. This theory is a major basis of the natural health movement and is even starting to gain support from conventional medicine. Despite the overwhelming popularity of Pasteur’s germ theory and the influence it has had on our society, many sources claim that shortly prior to Pasteur’s death, he admitted that Bernard was right and that the “terrain” is indeed everything.

The germ theory, along with pasteurization, promotes an unrealistic ideal of eliminating foreign microorganisms. About 90 percent of the cells in the human body are that of foreign bacteria, and in just the intestines alone, there exists an estimated 6 pounds of beneficial bacteria which contribute to digestion, immunity, detoxification, and a number of other important functions. It’s obvious that human health depends on a symbiotic relationship with these foreign microorganisms, but pasteurization and modern medicine’s support of the germ theory directly contradict this. Granted, there are instances when the immune system is overwhelmed with harmful pathogens and intervention is necessary, but in reality, the excessive attempts to sterilize our food and environment are mostly a compensation for compromised health and the poor food quality that results from bad farming practices.

Unhealthy Cows Produce Unhealthy Milk

A cow’s health is largely determined by its diet, and the nutritional quality of a cow’s milk is determined by the health of the cow. Therefore, the nutritional quality and healthfulness of milk depends on the diet of the cow that produces it. Cows naturally graze on grass, but most modern dairy cattle are fed grain and soy. Even worse, factory farmers feed their cattle bakery waste, citrus peels loaded with pesticides, and other items that barely resemble food. These unnatural diets greatly compromise the health of the cattle, and in turn, the quality of the milk that they produce. Furthermore, modern dairy cattle are often fed antibiotics on a regular basis to compensate for their poor health and susceptibility to illness, and some are also fed hormones to increase their milk production. Some dairy producers are even reviving swill milk by feeding their cattle the waste products of ethanol production. As a result of all this, modern dairy cattle generally live only about a quarter of their typical lifespan, and although these issues have been understood for more than 160 years, feeding dairy cattle an unnatural and poor quality diet continues to be the industry standard.

A common outcome of the poor conditions that dairy cattle are raised in is an infection of the mammary glands called mastitis. It’s estimated that 40% of all dairy cows in the United States have this infection, and the ones that do often secrete pus into their milk. This is identified by high counts of somatic cells, and according to the State and Federal Pasteurized Milk Ordinance, milk can contain a somatic cell count as high as 750,000 per milliliter prior to pasteurization. In contrast, raw milk from a healthy and properly raised cow typically contains a somatic cell count of 50,000 per milliliter or less.

Another common illness which results from the poor conditions in which most dairy cattle are raised is paratuberculosis, and similar to mastitis, it’s estimated to affect 40% of American cattle. Paratuberculosis is believed to be pathogenic to humans as well as cattle and has been identified as a possible cause of Crohn’s disease. The beneficial bacteria that exists in raw milk from healthy cattle can naturally inhibit pathogens like this and provide resistance to them, but ironically, these bacteria are destroyed by pasteurization while the pathogen that causes paratuberculosis survives it.

Why Raw Milk from Pasture Raised Cattle is Superior

Modern dairy cows are forced to produce as much as 17,000 pounds of milk per cycle which is 20 times more than what’s needed to sustain a healthy calf. Because cows transfer a fixed amount of vitamins into their milk, this has the effect of diluting its nutritional quality. This especially applies with vitamin E and beta-carotene. Pasture raised cattle generally aren’t pushed to this extent and their milk therefore contains more vitamins. The dairy industry’s solution to this is to fortify the diluted milk with calcium and synthetic vitamins which are poorly absorbed and can sometimes have toxic effects.

Cattle that naturally graze on pasture produce milk with higher concentrations of the fat soluble vitamins A, D, and K2 which the work of Dr. Weston A. Price has shown to be critical to excellent health. Milk from pastured cattle also contains higher amounts conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) which is believed to help fight cancer and prevent excessive weight gain. Finally, pasture fed cattle produce milk with a much healthier balance of essential fatty acids while the milk from grain fed cattle tends to be excessively high in omega 6 fatty acids which is an imbalance that promotes inflammation and has been associated with cancer and heart disease.

One of the most dangerous effects of feeding grain to cattle is that it causes their digestive tract to become more acidic which increases pathogen resistance. This is particularly the case with E. coli, and there are now strains of it that are resistant to the stomach acid of humans which normally kills it.

In addition to the higher quality of meat and milk that results, raising cattle on pasture is also much better for the environment because it eliminates the need for the grain and soy crops that are used to manufacture feed. More importantly, cattle manure is a natural fertilizer for the very same pastures that they graze on, but when they’re deprived of frequent opportunities to graze, their manure becomes a massive source of pollution, especially if it contains pathogens and chemical residues which is typically the case.

Unhealthy chickens produce unhealthy eggs.

Most grocers gets their eggs from poultry farms. These farms are the most unsanitary facilities on the planet. Thousands of chickens are crammed into small cages where they live their entire lives, indoors, unable to move around freely, and denied sunlight and fresh air. These chickens are subjected to the cruelest conditions throughout their entire life. Because they are not allowed to walk about freely outside where they can take in fresh air and absorb the Sun’s life giving rays, they are deemed unhealthy from day one.

This summer take a day and go visit a modern chicken hatchery in your area. The moment you drive onto the hatchery property you will quickly be overwhelmed by the unhealthy stench that millions of chickens are forced to live their entire lives inhaling. If you are brave enough and dare go inside you will see the cruelty that these chickens are forced to endure - all in the name of profit. During the middle of the summer the heat inside of some of those facilities is too unbearable for us to endure but 24 hours and day, seven days a week, 365 days a year millions of chickens are enduring these inhumane conditions. It wouldn’t take long for us to get very sick if we were forced to live like those chickens. How long do you suppose it takes for a chicken to become sick and unhealthy from living in such horrific conditions?

Forbes.com - The Healthiest Foods On Earth
Jonny Bowden, 07.07.09, 04:00 PM EDT

The most important consideration in constructing a healthy diet: Eat whole food with minimal processing. … raw milk, generally believed to be one of the healthiest beverages on the planet by countless devotees who often go to great expense and inconvenience to obtain it from small, sustainable farms.

… eggs–one of nature’s most perfect creations, especially if you don’t throw out the all-important yolk. (Remember “whole” foods means exactly that–foods in their original form. Our robust ancestors did not eat “low-fat” caribou; we don’t need to eat “egg-white” omelets.)

Truth be told, what you eat probably matters less than how much processing it’s undergone. Real food–whole food with minimal processing–contains a virtual pharmacy of nutrients, phytochemicals, enzymes, vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, anti-inflammatories and healthful fats, and can easily keep you alive and thriving into your 10th decade.– Jonny Bowden, licensed nutritionist and author of The 150 Healthiest Foods on Earth and six other books on health and nutrition tells Forbes readers that grass-fed meats, eggs and raw milk are among the top 10 healthiest foods on earth.

Every day thousands of Americans become sick from cigarettes and exposure to petroleum products. A can of soda contains absolutely no natural ingredients. Aspartame has been proven to make you fatter, it’s been proven to cause some pretty serious diseases, not the least of which are cancer and neurological diseases. Chlorine that is used to treat public water is a poison appropriately used to kill living things. “Cancer risk among people drinking chlorinated water is 93% higher than among those whose water does not contain chlorine.” ~ U.S. Council of Environmental Quality. There have been studies and medical practitioners who have reached the conclusion that chlorine was not only a cause of heart attack and stroke but the leading cause. They say it is the main cause of arterial plaques, which are the leading cause of heart attacks. Fluoride in toothpaste was used by the Nazi German scientists to sterilize inmates and make them docile. Fluoride has been found to increase the uptake of aluminum into the brain. Aluminum (from soda cans, beer cans, processed food cans, gum wrappers, chocolate bar wrapping, juice can and boxes and cooking pots and utensils) in the brain is believed to be the number one cause of Alzheimer, Dementia, Attention Deficit Disorder, and reduced IQ in children. There is enough poison in the average family size tube of tooth paste to kill a child. There is a warning on every tube of toothpaste that states; “Children under 6 years of age should use only a pea size amount of dentifrice (toothpaste) and should be supervised by an adult to avoid swallowing the product“. Trucking companies that transport toothpaste are required to display a Toxic Hazard sign on their vehicles in most countries, yet we are told this stuff is good for us and that we should eat foods, drink water, bathe in water, and brush our teeth with the poison known as fluoride. Fluoride is a key ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas (the same Sarin Nerve Gas that terrorists released on a crowded Japanese subway train March 20, 1995). In addition to being the primary ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, it is also a main ingredient in anesthetic, hypnotic, and psychiatric drugs as well as military nerve gas - the same nerve gas that the United States accused Saddam Hussein of possessing and releasing - the main unfounded and unjustified reason for the US attacking Iraq! The US even put Saddam on trial in a kangaroo court and hung him for crimes against humanity for allegedly experimenting and using Sarin gas and other toxins and chemicals on Iraqi civilians - the United States government does the same thing every day in the United States and launched the exact same kind of attacks against the Iraqi people in Fallujah Iraq. Why are all of these life threatening chemical and toxins allowed to be added to toothpastes, our drinking water and as ingredients in our processed foods of the American people? Why does the FDA allow these chemicals to continue to sicken us and kill us yet recalls, bans, render useless (pasteurization) and outright destroys all of our nutritional, essential, healing and 100% natural foods?

A group of former and serving US intelligence officers established an intelligence network in 2003 under the name “Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)”. The agenda of the group was to investigate foreign influence on US intelligence community and warn the US government about it being sucked into a war which doesn’t serve American interests.

The VISP steering committee includes Ray Close (CIA, 26 years), Phil Giraldi (CIA, 20 years), Larry Johnson (CIA, 24 years), Col. W. Patrick Lang (Defense intelligence, 30 years), Ray McGovern (US intelligence officer, 30 years), Coleen Rowley (FBI, 24 years) and Col. Ann Wright (US Army, 29 years and 16 years in US Foreign Service).

VIPS, in a Memorandum, has warned Barack Obama that USA is being sucked into an illegal war against the Islamic Republic by some members of his administration, whose loyalties are to Israel than the US.

MEMORANDUM:

We write to alert you to the likelihood that Israel will attack Iran as early as this month. This would likely lead to a wider war.

Israel’s leaders would calculate that once the battle is joined, it will be politically untenable for you to give anything less than unstinting support to Israel, no matter how the war started, and that U.S. troops and weaponry would flow freely. Wider war could eventually result in destruction of the state of Israel.

This can be stopped, but only if you move quickly to pre-empt an Israeli attack by publicly condemning such a move before it happens.

We believe that comments by senior American officials, you included, reflect misplaced trust in Israeli Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu.

Actually, the phrasing itself can be revealing, as when CIA Director Panetta implied cavalierly that Washington leaves it up to the Israelis to decide whether and when to attack Iran, and how much “room” to give to the diplomatic effort.

Netanyahu believes he holds the high cards, largely because of the strong support he enjoys in our Congress and our strongly pro-Israel media.

Even if the U.S. were to be sucked into a war provoked by Israel, there is absolutely no guarantee that the war would come out well.

Were the U.S. to suffer significant casualties, and were Americans to become aware that such losses came about because of exaggerated Israeli claims of a nuclear threat from Iran, Israel could lose much of its high standing in the United States.

There could even be an upsurge in anti-Semitism, as Americans conclude that officials with dual loyalties in Congress and the executive branch (Democrats, Republicans, and independents are members of The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) - a lobbying group that advocates for pro-Israel policies to the Congress and Executive Branch of the United States. The current President of the AIPAC is Lee Rosenberg, from Chicago, Illinois.) threw our troops into a war provoked, on false pretenses, by Likudniks for their own narrow purposes.

We do not have a sense that major players in Tel Aviv or in Washington are sufficiently sensitive to these critical factors.

You are in position to prevent this unfortunate, but likely chain reaction. We allow for the possibility that Israeli military action might not lead to a major regional war, but we consider the chances of that much less than even.

Very recent events that supports VISP’s MEMORANDUM

Four-fifths of the U.S. House and Senate recently declared in correspondence to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the U.S. must reaffirm its “unbreakable bond” with Israel. What persuaded Congress to proclaim their loyalty to Israel while the US military is waging war in the Middle East based on fabricated intelligence?

Yesterday former US ambassador to the UN John Bolton (one of The American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s top ally) declared Israel’s intent on attacking Iran in the coming days with the following remarks - “Israel has only mere days to launch an attack on Iran’s Bushehr nuclear reactor if Russia makes good on its plan to deliver fuel there this weekend.” He said that once Russia has loaded the fuel into the reactor — slated for Saturday – Israel would no longer be willing to strike for fear of triggering widespread radiation in an attack.

Today United States president Barack Obama left Washington for an unscheduled 10 day vacation to Martha’s Vineyard. Did Obama decide that “It’s time to get out of Dodge”?

Israel has just days to launch a military strike and stop Iran from developing a nuclear bomb, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations has warned.

The deadline was set by outspoken former envoy John Bolton, who claimed that time was running out for the West to crush Tehran’s atomic ambitions.

He said Iran is planning to bring its first Bushehr reactor online on Saturday, when a shipment of nuclear fuel will be loaded into the plant’s core.

At that point, he said it would be too late for Israel to attack the facility because it would spread radiation and affect innocent Iranian civilians.

‘Once that uranium, once those fuel rods are very close to the reactor, certainly once they’re in the reactor, attacking it means a release of radiation, no question about it,’ said Mr Bolton.

‘So if Israel is going to do anything against Bushehr it has to move in the next eight days,’ he told Fox News in the U.S.

If the Israelis fail to act, Mr Bolton said: ‘Iran will achieve something that no other opponent of Israel, no other enemy of the United States in the Middle East really has and that is a functioning nuclear reactor.’

Tehran continues to insist it is only building its atomic plant for peaceful purposes to provide cheaper electricity. But Britain, the U.S. and other western powers claim the Iranians are covertly creating a nuclear warhead.

Non-Proliferation Treaty states Iran has the right to production of energy from nuclear technology

The U.S. is violating the nuclear non-proliferation treaty by attempting to block Iran’s efforts to produce enriched uranium–provided it is used to produce electric energy as Iran states–while the U.S. itself is planning a new generation of nuclear weapons.

The 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty entered into force on March 5, 1970 when 187 parties joined the Treaty, including the then five nuclear-weapon states: United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China. More states have ratified the NPT than any other arms limitation and disarmament agreement.

Israel, Pakistan and India never signed the treaty and have since acquired nuclear weapons. Among these, Israel is believed to have the largest nuclear weapons stockpile estimated at 200 to 400 weapons.

Article 14 of UN Security Council Resolution 687, passed in 1991 at the conculusion of the Gulf War, has “the goal of establishing in the Middle East a zone free from weapons of mass destruction and all missiles for their delivery and the objective of a global ban on chemical weapons.” The UN has failed to move Israel toward this goal.

The Non-Proliferation Treaty was to be reviewed every five years, a provision which was reaffirmed by the States parties at the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference. At this Conference, the treaty was indefinitely extended.

Unlike Iran, whose nuclear facilities are open to inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.S. has consistently shielded Israel from pressures to sign the Treaty, and/or to open its facilities to inspection by the IAEA.

The production of energy from nuclear technology is permitted under the treaty, and nuclear nations are obligated to share nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

Article IV of the Treaty states:

1. Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination and in conformity with Articles I and II of this Treaty.

2. All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Parties to the Treaty in a position to do so shall also co-operate in contributing alone or together with other States or international organizations to the further development of the applications of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, especially in the territories of non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty, with due consideration for the needs of the developing areas of the world.

Provided it uses enriched uranium for peaceful purposes, Iran is in compliance with the Treaty. The U.S. by atempting to block Iran’s peaceful uses of nuclear energy would be violating the Treaty.