Strict Standards: Only variables should be passed by reference in /home/preswquq/public_html/nbg/fp-includes/core/core.fpdb.class.php on line 302


There’s mounting evidence of a link between ingredients in many sunscreens and skin cancer.

The Food and Drug Administration has been sitting on possibly damning data from government research studies since July 2009, Sen. Chuck Schumer revealed in June of 2010.

One study found tumors and lesions developed up to 21% faster in lab animals coated with sunscreen lotions containing certain derivative that’s in most of the 500 most popular sunscreens.

If the product is doing more harm than good, people have a right to know - and the FDA must take action,” Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters at Hudson River Park.

The regular use of sunscreen lotion might provide some protection from sunburn, but it poses some very serious health risks - for ourselves and the wider environment.

The sunscreen industry is huge - worth billions of dollars annually. It rose to mega-profitability when a link was made between skin cancer and overexposure to the sun in the late 60’s/early 1970’s. Yet the incidence of skin cancer continues to rise even though these products are widely used. Logically, if incidences of skin cancer has continued to rise especially after sunscreen has been widely used for the past 3 decades, then sunscreen must be the reason.

An investigation by the Environmental Working Group of over 1,500 sunscreens and other sun-blocking products currently on the market found that 3 of 5 sunscreens either don’t protect skin from sun damage or contain hazardous chemicals - or both.

Take a look at this partial list of ingredients that can be found in many sunscreen lotions:

Aminobenzoic acid - carcinogen implicated in cardiovascular disease.
Avobenzone - carcinogen
Cinoxate - evidence of skin toxicity
Dioxybenzone - strong evidence of skin toxicity and carcinogen; hormone disruptor and has been found in waterways, soil and air. Has been shown to have a “gender bender” effect in animals
Diazolidinyl urea - carcinogen, endocrine, central nervous system and brain effects, skin toxicity and compromises the immune system
Ecamsule - carcinogenic
Homosalate - endocrine disruption
Methylparaben - interferes with genes
Octocrylene - found to be persistent and bioaccumulative in wildlife, liver issues and carcinogenic
Octyl methoxycinnamate - accumulates in the body, disrupts liver and is a carcinogen
Octyl salicylate - broad systemic effects in animals at moderate doses
Oxybenzone - carcinogen and contributor to vascular disease, may affect the brain and nervous system in animals
Padimate O - carcinogen
Phenylbenzimidazole - carcinogen
Phenoxyethanol - irritant, carcinogen, endocrine disruption
Sulisobenzone - strong evidence of skin toxicity, affects sense organs in animals
Titanium dioxide - carcinogen when in nanomaterial form
Zinc Oxide - bioaccumulative in wildlife, evidence of reproductive toxicity

Does it make any sense that in order to prevent skin cancer, we need to slap on carcinogenic compounds and chemicals that interfere with our immune and reproductive systems and that also pose a risk to the wider environment? Millions of gallons of sunscreen is consumed each year. After application, it doesn’t mysteriously vanish - it winds up either soaking into our bodies and accumulating there or is excreted (into the environment) or washed off; again - into the environment.

Nobody has proven that sunscreen helps protect against melanomas. Researchers have, however, proven that the ingredients used to make the sunscreen are carcinogenic. A carcinogen is any substance, radionuclide or radiation, that is an agent directly involved in causing cancer. In other words, sunscreen is actually causing cancer and other health and environmental issues.

One of the major problems with sunscreen is that in order to be effective (claimed to be effective but never proven) against less serious forms of skin cancer, you need to use a lot of it, and far more often than what the manufacturers recommend and regardless of what the SPF rating is. Why do they advise you that more is better? Profit. The more you lather on the more often you will need to buy another, and another, and another bottle of sunscreen lotion. Cha-Ching

I have never used sunscreen and I’ve worked outdoors 9 hours a day for the past 30 years and I don’t have any cancer or disease of any kind. What about you?

Vitamin D is naturally produced by your body’s largest organ, the skin. Typical summer sun exposure of 20 minutes (without sunscreen and with face, arms and legs uncovered) produces 20,000 IU of vitamin D.

Can vitamin D cure cancer? Surprisingly, the answer is yes. Vitamin D is a powerful hormone that regulates and repairs bodily cells. Vitamin D is needed for optimum functioning of the immune and cardiovascular systems, increases white blood cell production and supports the prostate as well as healthy skin and bones. UVB rays from sunshine is essential to convert cholesterol in skin to vitamin D. The skin cannot produce natural vitamin D without UVB rays. The people who receive $80 billion a year for cancer research knows that and because of this reason they are falsely claiming UVB rays are harmful. In order for them to keep on getting $billions from your government in the form of tax dollars they are telling everyone to lather on layers and layers of clothing and toxic sunscreen to block out the sun’s essential ultra violet light. They want us to cover our Vitamin D producing skin in order to interfere and prevent our body from fighting and destroying cancer cells. The United States Department of Health and Human Services has declared ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun and artificial sources, such as tanning beds and sun lamps, as a known carcinogen (cancer-causing substance). The estimated 2008 cost of cancer care was $228.1 billion - that figure is a very good motive for them to fraudulently claim that UVB rays from sunshine is harmful and cancer causing when in fact UVB rays exposure is essential for the body to produce vitamin D. 20 minutes of UVB exposure is essential for preventing cancer.

If you have adequate amounts of vitamin D in your body, the cancer cells in your body stop growing and dividing uncontrollably, stops invading and destroying other bodily tissues, stops spreading throughout your body, and begins specialization for specific bodily functions.

Also the cancer cells lose their immortality, and begin to die normally. Vitamin D forces cancer cells to behave like normal cells!

The singular most important cause of cancer is vitamin D deficiency. Most, if not all, cancer patients are vitamin D deficient.

What is cancer?

Cancer involves groups of bodily cells growing and dividing uncontrollably, refusing specialization for specific bodily functions, invading and destroying other bodily tissues, and sometimes spreading throughout the body. Most cancers form a tumor, but not all. For example, leukemia (cancer of the blood or bone marrow) doesn’t.

Cancer affects people of all ages, but affects older people more. According to the American Cancer Society, cancer killed 7.6 million people worldwide in 2007!

Cancer is caused by damaged genes within bodily cells. These damages can be caused by tobacco smoke, asbestos fibers, radiation exposure (including from hospital and airport X-rays), fossil fuel, chemicals, or viral infections. Cancer-promoting genetic damages can also be inherited.

Normal cells are programmed to kill themselves if they become damaged beyond repair. Nevertheless, this program is turned off in cancer cells - allowing them immortality!

Basically, cancer cells are immortal “brain-damaged” cells that act crazy, killing normal cells, interfering with normal bodily functions.

Vitamin D

Vitamin D isn’t really a vitamin. Since vitamin D is usually produced by the body’s largest organ, the skin, it’s really a hormone. For a chemical substance to qualify as a hormone, it needs to be produced by one of the body’s organs.

Not only do plants need sunlight to be healthy, humans also need it. Long ago, sunlight exposure was the only way humans got adequate amounts of vitamin D. Most foods are vitamin D-free or contain small traces of it - not enough for best health! The human skin is designed to photosynthesize large amounts of vitamin D from sunlight exposure.

Researchers recently discovered vitamin D deficiencies among the following people:

People spending most of their time indoors,
People regularly covering all their skin with clothing,
People regularly slathering on sunscreen,
People aged 50 and older,
People with excessive body fat,
People with inflammatory bowel disease, and
People living far from the equator. For example, the following cities have high cancer rates: Seattle, Toronto, Boston, London, Dublin, Helsinki, Copenhagen, Berlin, Moscow, and Anchorage.

Also researchers found that dark-skinned people are more susceptible to vitamin D deficiency, because their skin filters out more sunlight than light-skinned people.

Additionally, researchers have discovered that many of the vitamin D deficient people developed medical conditions such as diabetes, osteoporosis, obesity, heart disease, clinical depression, chronic anxiety, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, psoriasis, eczema, high blood pressure, bone softening diseases, chronic pain, muscle weakness, viral infections, polycystic ovary syndrome, and migraine headaches.

In the past, people believed that taking 600 IU of vitamin D daily was enough for good health. Currently, researchers found that adults need at least 4,000 IU of vitamin D daily for therapeutic anticancer effects!

But how much is too much? Doesn’t vitamin D become toxic at high doses? Vitamin D does become toxic at high doses, but it’s much higher than you think. Researchers recently found that to poison yourself with vitamin D, you need to take at least 40,000 IU of vitamin D daily.

So if you have cancer, a strong and safe therapeutic dose of vitamin D in the range between 10,000 IU and 20,000 IU is needed daily.

Where to get adequate amounts of vitamin D?

These days we can no longer rely on our food supply as good sources of vitamin D. Either the soil is contaminated or too nutrient depleted to grow any food of good nutritional value. To make matters worse the FDA is now pasteurizing everything from milk, to eggs, to fruits and vegetables. Heat from pasteurization destroys the last remaining beneficial nutrients in our food. So where can we get an adequate supply of cancer curing Vitamin D? You can buy vitamin D tablets at vitamin and retail stores. It’s more convenient to buy tablets that have the highest dose per tablet. For example, bottles of vitamin D containing 2,000 IU per tablet. So you need to take only five tablets to equal 10,000 IU.

Sunlight exposure is the best way to get adequate amounts of cancer curing Vitamin D, as the body automatically regulates how much Vitamin D it makes from sunlight, and there is the added benefit of controlling cholesterol. Since vitamin D precursors require cholesterol for conversion into the hormone-like vitamin, without adequate sun exposure vitamin D precursors can turn into cholesterol instead of the vitamin.

It is estimated that for each 5% of skin surface exposed, approximately 435 IU of Vitamin D can be manufactured. Just 20 minutes of direct sun exposure to your skin will manufacture 20,000 IU of Vitamin D - enough to prevent and even cure you of cancer. In other words if you don’t have money to buy Vitamin D supplements or your diet doesn’t have enough Vitamin D, turn off your computers, TVs, video games, and go outside. With an adequate amount of daily sunlight exposure, the cancer cells in your body will stop growing and dividing uncontrollably, will stop invading and destroying other bodily tissues, will stop spreading throughout your body, and the Vitamin D produced naturally will begin specialization for specific bodily functions.

These are not oil reserve tanks. They are sewage treatment tanks. The fuel of the future for every city around the World. The citizens of the cities contribute to this renewable fuel supply 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and 365 days a year.

As a result of a demonstration project partly sponsored by the United States Environmental Protection Agency in cooperation with the Indianapolis Center for Advanced Research, the City of Indianapolis, Indiana, realized a 34% fossil fuel savings by incinerating sewage sludge. At the same time, sludge throughput was increased 10%. In addition to these proven savings, operational downtime for repairs was reduced, maintenance costs were reduced, and air pollution was reduced. The air pollution reduction allowed Indianapolis to cancel a $3,000,000 construction program for air pollution abatement.

Other cities incinerating sewage sludge in the United States that have initiated the fuel efficient mode of operation have saved even more fuel than Indianapolis. Nashville, Tennessee, reduced its fossil fuel usage 40%; Buffalo, New York, reduced its fossil fuel usage by 47% from design expectations; Hartford, Connecticut, reduced its fossil fuel usage by 51%; and Jacksonville, Florida has reduced its fossil fuel usage by over 50%.

These savings result from installing additional instrumentation and controls (often not required at newer facilities), modifying the incinerator operating methods, and training the operators to operate the facilities more efficiently. At Indianapolis, it cost $20,000 per incinerator for instrumentation and operator training. This was an older plant and required a maximum amount of new controls and instrumentation; however, the payback for this $20,000 was less than three months due to the reduction in fossil fuel use based on an oil price of $0.264 per litre ($1.00 per gallon). In the other cities where instrumentation controls were adequate, the cost for developing the now operating mode and training the operators averaged $75,000 per city.

Sludge is a huge environmental problem all over the world but it doesn’t have to be as we now have the know how and technology to turn this problem into a clean energy solution. Not only does this create a new energy source for all major cities around the World it also cleans up the environment. The more we use sewage sludge as a renewable fuel the cleaner our water supply becomes. We can actually clean up our lakes and rivers by using sewage sludge as a fuel source.


Ever wonder if there is a cleaner, cheaper, safer and 100% environmentally friendly fuel source? The truth is we had it all along, for millions of years. The one thing that sustains all life - plants, animals and humans - is also the source of our past, present and future energy needs. The safest, cheapest and cleanest fuel source is water.

Water covers 71% the Earth’s surface, the oceans contain 97.2% of Earth’s water. The Antarctic ice sheet, which contains 90% of all fresh water on Earth. Already knew that. What most of you don’t tend to remember is that water is composed of two gases - Oxygen and Hydrogen. Water is known as H2O with Hydrogen content being 2 parts to 1 part Oxygen. So what? Oxygen is what we all breath, including the engines in our vehicles. Hydrogen is the most abundant of the chemical elements, constituting roughly 75% of the universe’s elemental mass. To the point, hydrogen is a flammable gas making it a viable fuel source.

You’ve heard of hydrogen fuel cells being offered in new vehicles. They have made vehicles that run on hydrogen fuel cells, or in other words on hydrogen. If they already have the technology to run our vehicles on hydrogen why haven’t we gotten away from the polluting and war causing oil? The answer is profit. Once the technology gets out, and it is, the general population will have access to unlimited “free” fuel. Until they can monopolize all the water in the World they will develop new hydrogen technology at a crawl pace. Look at the oil companies today. They are at the top of the Fortune 500. Record profits are being made.

Every ship that sets to sea already has access to an unlimited supply of fuel. Every ocean vessel can sail without ever stopping to refuel. No more contaminating the water when ships dump their bilge water before entering ports. Their clean burning fuel is sea water. Sea water can be split into its Oxygen and Hydrogen gases and the hydrogen can be used to power the ship’s engines. The technology is there to drastically reduce our dependency on oil today.

A Canadian inventor has been busy working on new energy technology that will drastically reduce and one day eliminate the need for fossil fuels. His green energy technology company call Kincaids Energy Technology and Solutions has been working on a device that splits water into Hydrogen and Oxygen gas. The process called cold fission (fission is a splitting of something into two parts.) uses very little energy to split the bond between hydrogen and oxygen in water. The “Water for Fuel Project” process uses harmless radio waves to successfully separate the oxygen from the hydrogen in water. Immediately after applying a very low radio frequency to the water, hydrogen and oxygen bubbles begin to rise to the surface of the water.

The goal of the “Water for Fuel Project” is to use sea water as the fuel source for gas generators, gas stoves, barbecues, gas furnaces and gas lamps. The same device being developed can be modified to provide hydrogen gas from sea water to power the engines of every ship that sets sail carrying cargo, grain, and tourists. This device will drastically reduce the operating costs for every ocean vessel.

With Global Warming being blamed for the rising sea water levels using sea water (water that we cannot drink or use for crop irrigation) as a fuel is another viable solution to prevent shorelines from disappearing. The oceans contain 97.2% of Earth’s undrinkable water so why not convert it into a fuel source. By doing so we would also be re-oxygenating the air we breathe. When we separate the Hydrogen (H2) from the water (H2O) we are left with Oxygen. Something we and every other living creature on Earth needs to live.

Black water can very easily be converted into a renewable fuel source for every major city around the World. No more expensive drilling for fuel deposits. No more waging wars of aggression to steal control of the last remaining oil and natural gas. No more BP oil spill disasters.

It is possible for cities to produce their own energy fuel supply as well as be eco friendly. The infrastructure is already there and the fuel is already being pumped through the cities. What is it that will provide cities with fuel and at the same time drastically clean up the environment? The fuel source is free for the taking and is renewable. The answer to a major city’s energy needs is sewage.

Currently Ontario cities pump billions of liters of untreated sewage into the Great Lakes every year. The main reason for pumping raw sewage into the Great Lakes is a financial reason. Before now cities saw sewage as worthless. It costs $millions to treat sewage and some cities just don’t have the budget to treat all of the sewage. “Millions of Ontarians and their kids, drink, bathe, and eat food grown with Great Lakes water yet cities are to this day pumping billions of liters of “untreated” sewage into them. The answer to the cities needs both for energy and water treatment is treating the sewage as a fuel source.

How can sewage be used as a fuel source to say generate electricity for use in the cities to power street cars, lights, air conditioners, home appliances and business computers and machines? As unappealing as it may seem sewage can cut greenhouse gases, help cleanup water supplies and add a new source of green and endlessly renewable fuel. Left on its own to decay, waste pumped from septic systems (known as septage) produce methane gas (a powerful greenhouse gas in itself) and carbon dioxide, the most popularized greenhouse gas. The result is steady supply of methane that can be used directly as fuel or mixed with natural gas for pipeline distribution. (Natural gas is mostly methane. The mix is relatively easy.) Septic waste could become a valuable commodity since it could be used to make fuel. If septic waste were channeled away from wastewater treatment facilities those facilities would be left to process only gray water, like dirty dish water.


Methane Fuel Generation From Human Wastes

- Anaerobic fermentation or digestion is the most promising process for converting organic materials to methane and other gases.
- A simple apparatus can be constructed to produce bio-gas.
- Bio-gas usually contains about 60 to 70 percent methane, 30 to 40 percent carbon dioxide, and other gases.

Converting organic materials, such as human wastes, to an easily used form of fuel can be accomplished by several methods. The process with the greatest potential is anaerobic fermentation or digestion.

The extraction of fuel from wastes using anaerobic digestion to produce bio-gas is not new and the general technology is well known. Bio-gas, which is methane and other gases, has been known as swamp gas, sewer gas and fuel gas. Sewage treatment plants generate bio-gas from the sewage sludge as part of the sewage treatment processes. Since sewage treatment is a 24/7 process bio-gas is being produced 24/7 as well. Today though, the bio-gas is not collected and used as a fuel source for the energy needs of the city, it is all vented. Using human waste to produce a renewable fuel source is not rocket science. All you have to know is how the fuel is produced and then you simply make modifications to the sewage processing plants to start producing an unending supply of fuel.

First off methane is produced by bacteria. The bacteria are anaerobes and operate only in anaerobic environments (no free oxygen). Constant temperature, pH and fresh organic matter promote maximum methane production. Temperatures usually are maintained at approximately 95 degrees F. Other temperatures can be used if held constant. For each 20 degrees F decrease, gas production will be cut approximately one half or will take twice as long. A constant temperature is critical. Temperature variations of as little as 5 degrees F can inhibit the methane-formers enough to cause acid accumulation and possible digester failure.

Anaerobic digestion is a series of processes in which micro organisms break down biodegradable material in the absence of oxygen and is widely used to treat wastewater. As part of an integrated waste management system, anaerobic digestion reduces the emission of landfill gas into the atmosphere. Anaerobic digestion is widely used as a renewable energy source because the process produces a methane and carbon dioxide rich biogas suitable for energy production helping replace fossil fuels. Also, the nutrient-rich digestate can be used as fertiliser. The digestion process begins with bacterial hydrolysis of the input materials in order to break down insoluble organic polymers such as carbohydrates and make them available for other bacteria. Acidogenic bacteria then convert the sugars and amino acids into carbon dioxide, hydrogen, ammonia, and organic acids. Acetogenic bacteria then convert these resulting organic acids into acetic acid, along with additional ammonia, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide. Methanogens, finally are able to convert these products to methane and carbon dioxide.

Anaerobic digestion is a two-part process and each part is performed by a specific group of organisms. The first part is the breakdown of complex organic matter (manure) into simple organic compounds by acid-forming bacteria. The second group of microorganisms, the methane-formers, break down the acids into methane and carbon dioxide. In a properly functioning digester, the two groups of bacteria must balance so that the methane-formers use just the acids produced by the acid-formers.

Anaerobic digestion facilities have been recognised by the United Nations Development Programme as one of the most useful decentralised sources of energy supply, as they are less capital intensive than large power plants.

A simple apparatus can produce bio-gas. The amount of the gas and the reliability desired have a great influence on the cost and complexity of the system. A simple batch-loaded digester requires an oxygen-free container, relatively constant temperature, a means of collecting gas, and some mixing. Because methane gas is explosive, appropriate safety precautions are needed.

The solution to 2 very major problems (energy needs and waste treatment) that all cities face is already flowing beneath their streets. The solution is provided by its citizens 24/7 making it the most abundant and endlessly renewable source of fuel. Just redirecting sewage into a digester in urban areas meets the entire Kyoto protocol requirements for North American cities without even considering the natural gas production.


The main components of automobile exhaust are carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapor (H2O). Because of the rising concern over global warming due to greenhouse gases many countries are now adopting emission standards as a means to reduce CO2 emissions. Emission standards are requirements that set specific limits to the amount of pollutants that can be released into the environment. Many emissions standards focus on regulating pollutants released by automobiles (motor cars) and other powered vehicles but they can also regulate emissions from industry, power plants, small equipment such as lawn mowers and diesel generators.

In the United States, emissions standards are managed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The state of California has special dispensation to promulgate more stringent vehicle emissions standards, and other states may choose to follow either the national or California standards.

California’s emissions standards are set by the California Air Resources Board, known locally by its acronym “CARB”. Given that California’s automotive market is one of the largest in the world, CARB wields enormous influence over the emissions requirements that major automakers must meet if they wish to sell into that market. In addition, several other U.S. states also choose to follow the CARB standards, so their rulemaking has broader implications within the U.S.

The European Union has its own set of emissions standards that all new vehicles must meet.

Canada also has its own set of emission standards. Ontario’s Drive Clean is an automobile emissions control program in Ontario, Canada. Originally, vehicles under 4,500 kg (cars, SUV, light trucks) and over three years old (and up to the 19th year) required an emission test every two years before the vehicle’s owner or lessor can renew its license plate. Starting with 2006, the test exemption was increased to five years, while the rolling exemption at 20 years ended, and all 1987 and older vehicles became exempt.

Are only older cars the worse polluters? Not so. Some of the worse polluting vehicles on the road today are: the DODGE SRT-10 (Churning out 488 grams of carbon dioxide every kilometre - 488g/km), BMW M3 (309g/km), RENAULT Clio Renault Sport 200 (195g/km), VOLKSWAGEN Golf R32 4MOTION (255g/km) , FORD Ka, Post 2006 1.6 Duratec Sportka (182g/km), MERCEDES R-Class R63 AMG (387g/km), MERCEDES Viano 3.5 (284g/km), CADILLAC CTS-V (350g/km), CADILLAC Escalade 6.2 V8 (383g/km), and the BENTLEY Brooklands Coupé (465g/km) ~ according to the Environmental Transport Association following a study of more than 1,300 models of cars currently on sale in Britain.

Canadian clean energy technology and solutions company, KINCAIDs, is working on ways to help reduce CO2 emissions. Their latest clean energy device, the FuelReducer Xe was developed to help reduce CO2 emissions. A number of emission tests have recently been carried out at various emission testing sites throughout the GTA (Greater Toronto Area). A number of different vehicles were tested twice, once without a FuelReducer Xe and then again after a FuelReducer Xe was installed. The Ontario Drive Clean emission testing equipment showed a decrease in CO2 emissions.

The US federal government aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 28 percent by 2020, the White House announced in January 2010. The FuelReducer Xe can help reach that goal this year, 10 years ahead of schedule.


From the assassination of John F Kennedy by the CIA to the attacks of September 11, 2001 by the CIA there has always been a conspiracy by the United States government to conceal the truth. The United States government has been covering up their crimes by burying them and classifying them as state secrets. When JFK was murdered by people within the United States government they classified J Edgar Hoovers findings as a state secret. The very people who planned the assassination of their president covered up their crime against the United States - high treason. J Edgar Hoover named George HW Bush as the one who authorized the assassination of JFK with the full knowledge of Vice-President LB Johnson.

George HW Bush on board of a Zapta Petroleum oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico. The CIA codename for the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba in April 1961 was “Operation Zapata”. Through his work with Zapata Off Shore, Bush provided a commercial cover for the Bay of Pigs invasion. Former CIA staff US Army Brigadier General Russell Bowen wrote that there was a cover up of Zapata’s CIA connections. On January 8, 2007, newly released internal CIA documents revealed that Zapata had in fact emerged from Bush’s collaboration with a covert CIA officer in the 1950s. According to a CIA internal memo dated November 29, 1975, Zapata Petroleum began in 1953 through Bush’s joint efforts with Thomas J. Devine, a CIA staffer who had resigned his agency position that same year to go into private business, but who continued to work for the CIA under commercial cover.

CIA liaison officer Col. L. (Leroy) Fletcher Prouty alleged that Zapata Off Shore provided two of the ships used in the Bay of Pigs invasion: the Barbara J and Houston. Prouty claims he delivered two ships to an inactive Naval Base near Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for a CIA contact and he suspected very strongly
that George Bush must have been involved.

Zapata’s filing records with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission are intact for the years 1955-1959, and again from 1967 onwards. However, records for the years 1960-1966 are missing. The commission’s records officer stated that the records were inadvertently placed in a session file to be destroyed by a federal warehouse and that a total of 1,000 boxes were destroyed. The destruction of records occurred either in October 1983 (according to the records officer) or in 1981 shortly after Bush became Vice President of the United States (according to, Wison Carpenter, a record analyst with the commission).

The CIA was used to murder JFK. The CIA became willing participants because JFK refused to provide military support for the Bush family financed invasion of Cuba called the Bay of Pigs. Without US military support the invasion failed. The failure of the invasion also meant that George HW Bush lost $millions in revenue from a Zapata Petroleum takeover of Cuba’s oil. Under the advise of his brother Robert Kennedy, JFK refused to provide military support for the CIA Zapata Oil sponsored invasion of Cuba and for this reason the Bush family and the CIA murdered both John F Kennedy and Robert Kennedy.

Hoover’s findings were classified by Johnson, a willing conspirator, as state secrets. Johnson knew he would never be elected president so he aided and abetted the Bush family and the CIA in the murder of JFK and Robert Kennedy. The treasonous Bush family and the CIA were pardoned for the murder of a sitting president of the United States of America with the entire investigation being classified as a state secret. The secret that they didn’t want the public to know about is that people in their own government conspired to murder their elected leader. Had the Hoover investigation gone public George HW Bush and his family would have been lynched and the CIA would have immediately been dissolved and the CIA people involved in the murder would have been executed for their high crimes against the United States.

Thirty eight years later another Bush, George W with the aid of the CIA committed high treason against the United States and its people again. George W Bush, allowed his vice-president, Dick Cheney to assume the presidency on September 11, 2001. George W Bush was instructed to visit a school while Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld launched, Operation Northwoods. The planning and preparations were commenced during the later years of the Clinton administration, with full knowledge of Presidents Bill and Hillary Clinton. The Clintons and the Bush family conspired to wage war against the United States and they used a slightly revised version of Operations Northwoods. Clinton authorized and provided government funding to the CIA to prepare for and train for the attacks against the United States of America.


The attacks of September 11, 2001 was a false-flag operation plan that was originally written and presented to JFK and the United States government in 1962. The plan called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or CIA operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism on US soil. Originally these acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation but the Clintons and the Bush family revised their target to be a fictitious terrorist group called Al Qaeda. They blamed the phantom Al Qaeda for the attacks in order to create public support for a war against foreign states with oil and natural gas natural resources. States they would falsely accuse of being state sponsors of the United States created Al Qaeda terrorist organization.

The original Operation Northwoods included proposals for hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. The plan stated:

“The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.”

Several other proposals were included within the Operation Northwoods plan, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets and blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel.

In response to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations of the Cuba Project, Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the document listed methods, and outlined plans, that the authors believed would garner public and international support for U.S. military intervention in Cuba. These were to be staged attacks purported to be of Cuban origin.

The previously secret document was originally made public on November 18, 1997, by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board, a U.S. federal agency overseeing the release of government records related to John F. Kennedy’s assassination. The attacks of September 11, 2001 was based on the following Operation Northwoods plan of attack:

# Use of MIG type aircraft by US pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type planes would be useful as complementary actions. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce such fact. The primary drawback to this suggestion appears to be the security risk inherent in obtaining or modifying an aircraft. However, reasonable copies of the MIG could be produced from US resources in about three months.[15]

# Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba. Concurrently, genuine defections of Cuban civil and military air and surface craft should be encouraged.

# It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight.

a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.

b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will begin transmitting on the international distress frequency a “MAY DAY” message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to “sell” the incident.

# It is possible to create an incident which will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack.

a. Approximately 4 or 5 F-101 aircraft will be dispatched in trail from Homestead AFB, Florida, to the vicinity of Cuba. Their mission will be to reverse course and simulate fakir aircraft for an air defense exercise in southern Florida. These aircraft would conduct variations of these flights at frequent Intervals. Crews would be briefed to remain at least 12 miles off the Cuban coast; however, they would be required to carry live ammunition in the event that hostile actions were taken by the Cuban MIGs.

b. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly tail-end Charley at considerable interval between aircraft. While near the Cuban Island this pilot would broadcast that he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. No other calls would be made. The pilot would then fly directly west at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who had performed the mission under an alias, would resume his proper identity and return to his normal place of business. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared.

c. At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down, a submarine or small surface craft would disburse F-101 parts, parachute, etc., at approximately 15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast and depart. The pilots returning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found.

The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara. Kennedy personally rejected the Northwoods proposal, and removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Lemnitzer later became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963. The continuing push against the Cuban government by internal elements of the U.S. military and intelligence communities (the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion, the Cuban Project, etc.) had already prompted President John F. Kennedy to attempt to rein in burgeoning hard line anti-Communist sentiment that was intent on proactive, aggressive action against communist movements around the globe. After the Bay of Pigs, Kennedy had fired CIA director Allen W. Dulles, Deputy Director Charles P. Cabell, and Deputy Director Richard Bissell, and turned his attention towards Vietnam. Kennedy had also stripped the CIA of responsibility for paramilitary operations like the Bay of Pigs and turned them over to the U.S. Department of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which, as Commander in Chief, Kennedy could more directly control. On November 22, 1963 the CIA took back what Kennedy took from them. After the CIA assassinated JFK Lyndon Baines Johnson reinstated the CIA responsibility for paramilitary operations in the war in Vietnam. The CIA immediately began to pour into Vietnam to take control of the Opium drug trade which they needed to support their covert black ops. Many Vietnamese and Laos civilians were tortured and murdered by the CIA, not for being suspected of being Vietcong but as a result of the CIA’s illegal arms and drug smuggling and trade. The CIA website states “The largest paramilitary operations ever undertaken by the CIA took place in the small Southeast Asian Kingdom of Laos.”

Journalist James Bamford summarized Operation Northwoods in his April 24, 2001 book Body of Secrets:

Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.

On August 3, 2001, the National Assembly of People’s Power of Cuba (the main legislative body of the Republic of Cuba) issued a statement referring to Operation Northwoods and Operation Mongoose wherein it condemned such U.S. government plans.

On September 11, 2001 the government of the United States and the CIA jointly launched an attack against the United States. Like the plan in Operation Northwoods, the entire US Air Force was engaged in simulated exercises allowing the CIA to fly unmanned remotely controlled CIA owned aircraft, that were painted to look like US commercial airlines, and crashed them into the World Trade Centers. One hijacked plane was reported to have aired a May Day distress call and a person on the aircraft, a Barbara Olson, a conservative commentator and attorney, was reported to have called her husband, Solicitor General Tim O’Brien, to tell him that the plane was hijacked. Like in Operation Northwoods that was the last communication from the aircraft before it reportedly crashed into a field.


Millions of people saw what appeared to be a commercial airline fly into the WTC towers and they watched in horror as 3 WTC buildings collapsed. What they didn’t see is what really happened. The United States used trickery to fool the people into believing they saw US commercial airlines, filled with people, crash into the WTC buildings and the heat from the ensuing fire caused them to collapse killing hundreds more trapped inside. The CIA played a very big role to contribute to the illusion and the mass deception of 9/11. The CIA, the Secret Service and the FBI all had offices in the three buildings that were demolished on September 11, 2001. Because the CIA had offices in those buildings they were able to prepare the buildings for a controlled demolition using thermite shape charges attached to the steel frame of the building - molten iron residue, which is a ‘Controlled Demolition’ Signature was found and photographed on the day of September 11, 2001. No plane had hit WTC7 yet it free fell allegedly from small fires that the fire department had stated they had knocked down (firemen talk that means the main body of the fire has been suppressed).


Immediately after the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile, as reported by Donald Rumsfeld himself, the secret service was ordered by Dick Cheney to confiscated all CCTV video from the surrounding business establishments. CCTV video cameras at both a nearby gas bar and hotel had a bird’s eye view of the attack. Those CCTV video have been since been classified as state secrets. The Bush administration refused to release any of the confiscated videos from those two businesses because they clearly showed what really flew into the Pentagon. Those CCTV videos alone would have proven that the United States government and the CIA launched a false flag attack against the United States. The confiscation and suppression of this evidence as states secret, conceals the evidence that would indict and convict the US government and the CIA of high treason, 1st degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, sabotage, conspiracy to commit sabotage, terrorism, conspiracy to commit terrorist acts, bombing, fraud, perjury and obstruction of justice.

Since the assassination of JFK the United States government has conspired with the CIA to conceal their crimes against the United States and the United States people by classifying their crimes as state secrets.

Crimes covered up by US government as State Secrets

Torture is a major crime. Torture is prohibited under international law and the domestic laws of most countries. All forms of torture are strictly prohibited - including the United States style of torture called waterboarding. Waterboarding is a form of torture that consists of immobilizing the subject on his/her back with the head inclined downwards. Water is then poured over the face into breathing passages, thus triggering the mammalian diving reflex causing the captive to experience the sensations of drowning. In contrast to submerging the head face-forward in water, waterboarding precipitates an almost immediate gag reflex. It can cause extreme pain, dry drowning, damage to lungs, brain damage from oxygen deprivation, other physical injuries including broken bones due to struggling against restraints, lasting psychological damage and, if uninterrupted, death. Adverse physical consequences can manifest themselves months after the event, while psychological effects can last for years.

CIA rendition is a major crime known as kidnapping. In criminal law, kidnapping is the taking away or transportation of a person against the person’s will, usually to hold the person in false imprisonment, a confinement without legal authority.

Assassination is a major crime. An assassination is “to murder by sudden or secret attack, often for political reasons.” It is the act of deliberately killing someone, especially a public figure, usually for hire or for political reasons.

Drone killing is a major crime. Unmanned armed drones are used by the United States to murder civilians. Drone killings target civilians who are alleged of being or supporting the resistance against US aggressions and occupations abroad. There is no evidence offered by or sought by the United State to prove that any of the murdered civilians are guilty of any crime. All drone killings are armed attacks against unarmed civilians. Drone killings are war crimes committed by the United States against unarmed civilians. In all armed conflicts the Killing of Civilians is a crime against humanity. The Massacres of Civilians is a crime against humanity.

Participation in a common plan of conspiracy for the accomplishment of crimes against peace is a war crime. The NATO attack and occupation against Afghanistan is a major crime - Crimes against Peace. Planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression and other crimes against peace - crimes that have been committed by the United States government and NATO. The armed attacks against civilian villages and their civilian populations during the occupation of Afghanistan is a war crime.

War crimes are those serious violations of the laws applicable in armed conflict giving rise to individual (including heads of state) criminal responsibility. Examples of such conduct includes “murder, the ill-treatment or deportation of civilian residents of an occupied territory to slave labor camps”, “the murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war”, the killing of hostages, “the wanton destruction of cities, towns and villages, and any devastation not justified by military, or civilian necessity”.

Article 22 of the Hague IV (”Laws of War: Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907”) states that “The right of belligerents to adopt means of injuring the enemy is not unlimited”. Today the United States is the belligerent. Their actions beginning October 7, 2001 (the start of the United States Wars of Terror) are criminal acts, perpetrated not by terrorists but by the president, vice-president and secretary of defense of the United States of America.


What benefit has the War on Terror served any country? What did the War on Terror accomplish? The truth is that it has only benefited those wishing to profit from the ultimate sacrifice of the American soldiers for a war based entirely on lies and a war against a totally fictitious enemy. The War on Terror accomplished what no terrorist organization could accomplish. It gave the US government an unjustified excuse to transform intelligence from a tool for law enforcement to a means of avoiding the law–both national and international. The “War on Terror” has seen intelligence agencies emerge as major political players. “Rendition,” untrammeled surveillance, torture and detention without trial are all illegal under both US and International Law yet the US government, first under Bush and now under Obama, are making these illegal acts their official policies. The new culture of victimhood in the US and among partners in the “coalition of the willing” has crushed domestic liberties and formed a global network of extra-legal license. State and corporate interests are increasingly fused in the new business of privatizing fear. The bureaucracy and narrow political goals surrounding intelligence actually have the potential to increase the terrorist threat. Americans are being killed for arrogance, for lies and for continuing the unlawful occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Many have found that the pro-Bush doctrine 9/11 Commission not only failed to help us understand what happened; it also omitted or distorted most of the facts. But if we really want to zero in on the exact turning point around which we plunged into chaos, we need to focus in particular on the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings. This is where our hearts were wrenched and our minds were made ready for never-ending war, torture, and apparently the end of everything that was American. If we are ever to emerge from this insanity, we need to know how three tall buildings collapsed due to fire, all on the same day, when no such thing has ever happened before.

Is there any doubt at all that the Bush administration committed acts of terrorism when it unlawfully used force and violence against the nation of Iraq to intimidate and coerce its government and the civilian population, in furtherance of the Bush/PNAC political and social objectives.

While the real threats to life in America and on Earth are completely ignored by the media (and the Bush / Obama administrations), we are convinced that terrorists are the only real threat out there. Political corruption, crime and environmental toxins have killed more people than all the terrorist attacks combined. Global warming may result in global catastrophe. These are threats that we can prevent to some extent. The Bush administration’s policies are making these threats worse while they pretend to protect us from terrorists.

Both the Bush administration and now the Obama administration have endangered us all with most of their policies and they are not protecting anyone from terrorist threats. The media would have you believe otherwise.

Sacrificing human rights in the name of security at home, turning a blind eye to abuses abroad and using pre-emptive military force where and when it chooses, have neither increased security nor ensured liberty. The US has lost its high moral ground and its ability to lead on peace and elsewhere. Since September 11, 2001 a flood of federal legislation has reduced American freedom without increasing our security.

Weapons, or tools of death, can be found anywhere. Anyone with the will to kill and a little creativity can figure out a way to kill on a massive scale. A tiny explosive in the right place can kill millions; such as in a chemical plant or nuclear reactor. We have been falsely led to believe that WMDs, most specifically Iraqi WMDs are the greatest threat to Americans. The Bush/PNAC administration have used this fear in order to garnish support for their radical extremist agenda. The news media seems to be part of the scam.

It was not a weapon of mass destruction that took down the World Trade Center. We can never control every weapon on the planet because too many things can be used as weapons. We can however reduce the reasons for such anger and hatred that makes people want to kill us in large scale. We can do this by refraining from attacking any country without provocation. We can do this by settling our differences through peaceful means. We can do this by applying and adhering to the rule of law.

The Bush administration attacked 2 countries that did not attack or threaten the US. They mass murdered the civilian population of Iraq and Afghanistan for the US profit gain - namely oil from Iraq and Natural Gas pipeline in Afghanistan. George W Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Robert Gates and other Bush administration officials are all guilty of mass murder, torture, wars of aggression, crimes against peace and terrorism. The US is a member of the United Nations and as a member they are bound by US Law and the UN Charter to settle their differences by peaceful means and they are strictly prohibited from waging any war of aggression against any other nation. The Bush administration used the criminal acts of September 11, 2001 to begin their war of lies and corruption against the US people and the World. Their War on Terror is a War based entirely on Lies. Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan attacked the US or any of the US allies on September 11, 2001. They would have the US people believe they did. This is the biggest lie of all times. This is the biggest crime of all times. They sold their lies to the US people and to the US Congress. They waged war against 2 countries that did not attack the US. They attacked and murdered innocent people. They have enslaved those innocent people. They have accused the innocent people of Iraq and Afghanistan of a crime that they did not commit and the US continues to murder and imprison the innocent people of Iraq and Afghanistan.

While the Bush/PNAC/US Media team has us fear Iraq, terrorists and other select WMDs, there are other threats all around us, including conventional WMDs like the ones we were supposed to be in Iraq. Our environmental policy alone will be responsible for the untimely death of millions of people, but more obvious is the many weapons that are around us right now that we are not paying attention to - like the United States weapon of mass destruction called HAARP that is used to attack foreign states by creating and controlling hurricanes, heat waves, flooding and earthquakes. What about the biological weapon called the A-H1N1 virus that was released in 2009, not by terrorists but by the United States government, in a failed attempt to kill millions. The next time we might not be so lucky.

If WMDs were really the issue we would be securing the ones right here at home. As you can see we pay them little attention, which only proves that it is not about WMDs.

Be aware that when the terror alert is raised there is probably a political agenda behind it that is being hidden. The first orange alert covered up the fake Colin Powell dossier story, although it hit in Europe like a ton of bricks.

Keep in mind that a possible reason that we are not really being protected as promised is because the threat of terror was hyped in the first place. We are at greater risk from pollution than we are from terror! We are a greater risk from the president of the United States assuming dictatorial powers than we are from a terror attack. Bin Laden didn’t take away the US people’s rights and freedoms the US government did that. Bin Laden didn’t bankrupt the US the US government did with their $trillion embezzlement of US Tax dollars. Bin Laden didn’t create a housing bubble and then started taking away your homes through orchestrated foreclosures. Bin Laden didn’t cause millions of Americans to lose their jobs the US government did. Bin Laden is not a terrorist your government is. A clear and present danger exists in the US today and the government is the only real terrorist threat to the rights, freedoms and prosperity of the US people.

According to a report issued by the US Department of State on April 2004, thirty-five (35) American citizens died from international terrorism world-wide in 2003.- The extent of the harm to U.S. citizens does not either warrant a “war on terrorism”: In the same year as 35 U.S. citizens were killed for political reasons world-wide, 16,503 persons were murdered and 93,433 persons were raped in the U.S. alone (FBI statistics). This alone demonstrates that the motive for the “war on terrorism” is not the number of victims nor their identities. During the same year 5 million people died from smoking related illness. Which is a bigger threat to life?

JFK - “Let us call a truce to terror. Let us invoke the blessings of peace. And as we build an international capacity to keep peace, let us join in dismantling the national capacity to wage war.”

JFK - “We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”

JFK - “Our duty as a party is not to our party alone, but to the nation and, indeed, to all mankind. Our duty is not merely the preservation of political power but the preservation of peace and freedom.”

Every year millions of people from around the World are hit hard in the pocket book with high heating costs. As a direct result of high heating bills millions of people, mostly in the low to middle income bracket, are forced to make a financially detrimental decision every winter. What to sacrifice in order to pay the heating bill.

For decades there has only been 2 real choices for heating your home. Either you heat with oil or electricity. Oil prices have steadily risen since 2001 and so has electricity costs. With oil there is little one can do but with electricity there is a lot that can be done.

Most home owners who heat their home using some sort of baseboard heater are faced with high electrical bills. That is guaranteed because baseboard heaters are one of the most power consuming devices in your home. A baseboard heater for an average size living room normally are rated at a minimal of 1000 watts of electrical power consumption. Some are as much as 2000 watts. Depending on how many rooms your home has your home heating electrical bill can be very high.

The solution to reducing high electrical heating costs is to rethink how we use electricity to heat our homes. To start we need to drastically reduce the power consumption of baseboard heaters. In order to do this we need to either eliminate or replace the power hungry heating element. The heating element of all baseboard heaters uses a lot of electricity just to get it hot enough to generate any heat. Then it needs a lot of electricity to keep the element hot enough to maintain a comfortable temperature.

The sole proprietor owner of FuelReducer has come up with a new electrical heating apparatus that could drastically reduce home heating cost. This new electrical heating apparatus has eliminated the existing power hungry heating element of the mass produced baseboard heaters and substituted it with a more energy efficient heat producing apparatus. The electrical heating apparatus uses less than half the electricity as currently marketed baseboard heaters. The high heat source for this heating apparatus isn’t a totally new technology. It has been around for decades.

This new device isn’t available in stores yet. It is currently being developed and tested by the owner of FuelReducer. More information on this new development and the development of other clean energy technology and solutions by FuelReducer is available on the website

This new electrical heating apparatus is being developed to help reduce our dependency on oil by providing an electrical home heating device that uses a lot less electricity. The unit is being designed to either sit on a floor, table or counter or hung on a wall near an electrical outlet, like a picture. It could also be placed in front of a drafty window so that the unit can warm the cold draft. No need to call an expensive electrical technician as maintenance can be done by the home owner. The unit also has another very important feature that will be revealed after development is complete and the units are ready for marketing.

Testing has begun

Testing of the first prototype began in October 2010. The prototype was made entirely from store bought items. To make this prototype parts were stripped from various electrical appliances, tools and devices in the home of the owner of FuelReducer. The first test prototype used just 300 watts of electrical power. The amount of heat produced from just 300 watts of power was so great that the front of the unit began to overheat so the unit is going to be modified and retested. The fact that the first prototype consumed just 300 watts of power and produced a considerable amount of heat means that the FuelReducer heater consumed less than 1/3 the electrical power of the mass produced baseboard heaters (1000 watts is the average electrical consumption of a baseboard heater for a mid size to large size room). The tested prototype unit got so hot that the internal wire mesh safety grill (placed to prevent household insects or small common household debris from coming into contact with the heat source) turned red hot. After allowing it to cool down, the safety mesh was removed and the unit retested. Using just 300 watts of electricity the unit got hotter than a baseboard heater of a comparable size. The face plate of the FuelReducer 300 watt heater got too hot to touch.

In one test a digital thermometer was placed a few inches above the FuelReducer heater prototype and the temperature was recorded at 22 degrees Celsius (71.6°). The FuelReducer heater prototype was then plugged into an electrical outlet and the temperature shot up 10 degrees to 32 degrees Celsius (89.6 ºF) in less than a minute.

In the winter months if the power goes out most people use gas or diesel powered generators for emergency power. Most generators can’t power existing electrical baseboard heaters. The power consumption is just to great. A 1000 watt baseboard heater or even a 1000 watt portable heater would put a heavy power demand on any power generator. The FuelReducer heater doesn’t. The power demand of the FuelReducer heater would be comparable to 3 - 100 watt incandescent bulbs. It would consume only as much power as a desktop computer system.

Invest in a cleaner future

If you or your company would like to invest in the development and production of this new electrical home heating apparatus or one of the many other clean energy designs you are encouraged to contact FuelReducer directly. Contact FuelReducer by email at or through voice mail at (301) 637-7745. FuelReducer is a clean energy technology and solutions company. FuelReducer’s goal is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing fossil fuel consumption.


Was the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill the greatest environmental disaster ever? No! A much larger oil spill can be found in Alberta Canada. The BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill was accidental. The oil spill in Alberta Canada is not accidental, it is deliberately man made. The BP oil spill can be cleaned up. The Alberta Canada oil spill will never be cleaned up. The BP oil spill is temporary. The Alberta Canada oil spill has been ongoing since 1967 and will continue for an estimated 170 years. The entire World media covered the BP oil spill, and showed the World the impact the spill was having on the environment. No one is covering the greatest environmental threat to Canada and the World - the Alberta’s oil sands.

On April 20, 2010, a semi-submersible exploratory offshore drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico exploded after a blowout and sank two days later, killing eleven people and causing a massive oil spill threatening the coast of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, and Florida. The rig is owned and operated by Transocean Ltd on behalf of BP, which is the majority owner of the oil field. The company originally estimated the size of the leak at about 1,000 barrels a day but later accepted government estimates of a leak of at least 5,000 barrels per day. Huge no matter which figure you choose to believe but the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill is nothing compared to the catastrophic environmental disaster that occurs daily in Alberta Canada. BP is also apart of this catastrophic environmental disaster. BP is one of numerous firms who are extracting oil from Canadian oil sands, a process that produces four times as much CO2 as conventional drilling. The Cree aboriginal group describe BP as being complicit in ‘the biggest environmental crime on the planet’.

The Alberta Tar Sands (Saudi Arabia of the North as it is proudly referred to in the oil industry), has proven to be a financial boom to the Canadian economy. It has also proven to be an environmental nightmare. Most of the oil that is being pumped out - or actually mined out to be fried; sprayed clean and then dried; pressed and squeezed so the dirt can ultimately be liquefying - has come at an extremely high cost to the environment.

Massive dead lakes are being intentionally created to store all the oily water residue from the oil extraction process and natives are worried that it’s only a matter of time before that toxic sludge finds its way into the local drinking water.

The Oil Sands in 2007 produced 40 million tons of ‘greenhouse gas emissions’ which equals to about 10 million cars on the Canadian roads. This could grow to 142 million by 2020 if left unchecked. It is also estimated that within a couple of years, 50% of Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions will be attributable to the Athabascan Oil Sands. The province of Alberta, with 10% of Canada’s population is now responsible for 50% of Canada’s pollution!

The environmental disaster that is playing out in the Alberta’s Oil Sands, - all in the name of Canadian prosperity and US insatiable demand for oil, has made Canada one of the worlds worst contributors of ‘carbon gas emissions’.

Demand for the sticky, dirty-to-extract crude of the tar sands (called bitumen) has soared. The sector has exploded. The pressure to develop keeps mounting, with no political will to curb it, despite the serious climate and financial risks involved.

The US demand has triggered the need/greed for more capacity out of the tar sands. It’s a massive infrastructure change, the advent of a whole new fossil fuel supply chain, or a “pollution delivery system”. The building of a continent-wide network of pipelines, some thousands of miles long, to transport the crude, as well as refinery expansions on the US side of the Great Lakes to process the raw goo into gas. Pipeline and refinery expansion applications are being made and approved right now with little general awareness of the potential long-term damage to the environment.

Alberta Oil Sands - the most destructive project on Earth.

-Oil sands mining is licensed to use twice the amount of fresh water that the entire city of Calgary uses in a year.
-At least 90% of the fresh water used in the oil sands ends up in ends up in tailing ponds so toxic that propane cannons are used to keep ducks from landing.
-Processing the oil sands uses enough natural gas in a day to heat 3 million homes.
-The toxic tailing ponds are considered one of the largest human-made structures in the world. -The ponds span 50 square kilometers and can be seen from space.
-Producing a barrel of oil from the oil sands produces three times more greenhouse gas emissions than a barrel of conventional oil.

Current Canadian Minority Prime Minister Stephen Harper is looking like ‘the fool on the hill’ on the global stage with many nations using hard words like ’saboteur’ to explain Harper’s actions when it comes to the global climate change debate, but in reality, he’s only protecting his own interests. He won’t be prime minister forever and when he does return to the province of Alberta he’ll be able to rightly share in that province’s modern day ‘black gold rush!’ Stephen Harper refuses to show leadership and put hard caps on Canada’s global warming emissions — all so the tar sands can keep growing. No matter how much Canadians clamor to join the global fight against climate change, we are being held hostage by the tar sands.

The tar sands have quickly grown to become the most destructive project on Earth. Their greenhouse gas emissions are the main reason Canada’s emissions keep rising, the main reason we cannot live up to international agreements, the main reason we are becoming an international pariah on the most important issue facing humanity.


Is it really worth it to literally destroy the environment? The World’s fresh water supply is fast disappearing, not the result of human consumption but from wasteful oil extraction from Alberta’s oil sands. The water is being contaminated by the oil extraction process. Millions of liters of fresh water per day are used by the oil extraction refineries. That water will never be fit for human or animal consumption ever again. It is a loss of the most essential element on Earth. Fresh water is essential for the survival of humanity and every living thing on Earth. Water is a ubiquitous chemical substance that is composed of hydrogen and oxygen and is vital for all known forms of life. It is essential for growing the food we need to survive. Approximately 70% of freshwater is consumed by agriculture.

Oil is not essential. It isn’t essential for the survival of all humanity. Oil only puts money in the pockets of a very select few. The amount of money they receive for destroying the environment and humanity can never be fully spent and it can’t be taken with them when they die. Perhaps the only way these greedy politicians and business people will see what they are destroying is to force them to live the rest of their lives on the banks of the oil sludge lakes they created. Force them to live off of the land they destroyed and drink from the waste water they created. Only then would they realize that even their own existence is being destroyed by their greed.

Map of the Caspian Pipelines and their proposed routes. Pay close attention to proposed pipeline routes 6, 7 and 8. Pipeline 8 is through Afghanistan which NATO unlawfully attacked and now occupies. Proposed pipelines 6 and 7 goes through Iran. Iran is clearly the next target of aggression by NATO and the United States. Not because of nuclear energy ambitions but to take control of Iran and build Caspian Pipelines 6 and 7.

The real reason why NATO attacked Afghanistan has nothing to do with 9/11. The real reason is exactly the same reason why the United States attacked Iraq - OIL. The United States began planning an attack against Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran years before 9/11. Planning began when the elected ruling party of Afghanistan, the Taliban, chose non-American oil companies to build a Trans-Afghan pipeline across Afghanistan to Pakistan. For years the Taliban were eagerly negotiating with the United States to build this pipeline and they were even invited to Texas where they were entertained by then Texas Governor George W Bush and the major oil companies of the United States. The pipeline construction negotiations ended when the United States demanded complete control of the Trans-Afghan oil and natural gas pipeline that was proposed to be built through Afghanistan. The United States demands amounted to the robbery of a very lucrative financial future for the Afghan people. The Taliban refused to accept the outrageous demands made by the United States and rightfully so began negotiating with other non-American oil companies to build their black gold pipeline. The Taliban were looking out for what was in the best interest of their country and people. Foreign control of their financial future was out of the question. US control over the Trans-Afghan pipeline project was and is a violation of the territorial integrity and political independence of Afghanistan. The Taliban did exactly what any other country leader would do if a foreign country tried to take control of a major source of revenue for their country and people.

It wasn’t long after the Taiban signed a deal with a non-American company that the US government launched a revised version of Operation Northwoods on September 11, 2001. Operation Northwoods was a false flag attack against the United States by the United States government. Operation Northwods was used as a pretext for war to take control of the oil of the Caspian region.

The Caspian Pipeline was and still is the real reason why the United States attacked and now occupies Afghanistan. The United States sent more troops and now tanks to Afghanistan to clear a path for the pipeline through Afghanistan. Over 90% of NATO illegal attacks against the Afghan and Pakistani civilian population is to clear a path so that construction can begin. The United States did exactly that when they made plans to build a railroad across the United States. They sent the army to hunt down and kill the native American Indians, not because they were violent savages who threatened the white American colonists but because the land belonged to the native American people and the United States government refused to negotiate and buy the land. The land where the Tran-Afghan pipeline is to be built belongs to the Afghan people and once again the United States refuses to negotiate with the representatives of the Afghan people - the Taliban - to build the pipeline. Instead the United States has sent their army to once again hunt and murder the Afghan people and their elected leaders - the Taliban.

For evidentiary proof that oil was the real reason why NATO launched a unlawful war against Afghanistan and Iraq you need only to visit C-SPAN’s website. In a conference titled “Caspian Pipelines: The Keys to the New Oil Rush” the heads of a US oil and gas consortia in the Caspian conducted an overview of planned routes, challenges and possible solutions. The videos on that website gives evidence that the United States had their eyes on the Caspian oil since as early as November 19, 1997 - almost 4 years before 9/11. Watch the videos at The videos clearly presents concrete evidence that the United States planned for and prepared for a war with Afghanistan long before 9/11. The planning, preparation, initiation and waging of this war against Afghanistan by the United States is a war of aggression - a military conflict waged without the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a crime under the customary international law. The military actions and war crimes committed by the United States and NATO against Afghanistan and Iraq is exactly the same military actions and war crimes committed by Adolf Hitler’s Nazi regime in World War II. The waging of this type of war was called the supreme crime by Justice Robert H. Jackson, chief prosecutor for the United States at the Nuremberg Trials.

The Nürnberg Tribunal condemned all war of aggression in the strongest terms: “To initiate a war of aggression . . . is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.” It held individuals accountable for “crimes against peace”, defined as the “planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing….” When the United Nations General Assembly unanimously affirmed the Nürnberg principles in 1946, it affirmed the principle of individual accountability for such crimes.

The rule of law is clear. The use of armed forces by the United States and NATO against Afghanistan and Iraq is a major crime. The North Atlantic Treaty specifically states that NATO was: founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law.

The rule of law states:

* The “territorial integrity” rule means that it is a crime of aggression to use armed force with intent permanently to deprive a state of any part or parts of its territory, not excluding territories for the foreign affairs of which it is responsible;

* The “political independence” rule means that it is a crime of aggression to use armed force with intent to deprive a state of the entirety of one or more of the prerequisites of statehood, namely: defined territory, permanent population, constitutionally independent government and the means of conducting relations with other States;

* The “sovereignty” rule means that it is a crime of aggression to use armed force with intent to overthrow the government of a state or to impede its freedom to act unhindered, as it sees fit, throughout its jurisdiction.

The Iraqi and Afghan people are the innocent victims of the US and NATO crimes.

There is no statue of limitation for the actions taken by the US when they attacked Iraq and Afghanistan. Their attacks were premeditated homicide. They attacked without cause or provocation. Their actions were taken, not out of legal self-defense, as proven by their admission that Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks of September 11, 2001 against the US, but out of aggression. The FBI has already gone on record stating that Usama bin Laden, the purported accused mastermind of 9/11, had nothing to do with 9/11. The FBI, the US national (federal) police force stated that there was no evidence to link bin Laden to 9/11. That statement alone made the US attacks against Afghanistan and then Iraq illegal.

The US waged a war of aggression against both Iraq and Afghanistan. The taking of innocent lives is the criminal act known as homicide. There is no immunity for anyone who commits homicide. There is not justification, reason or just cause to commit homicide other than out of self-defense. The US attacked and commited mass homicide against the Iraqi and Afghan people. Their actions were premeditated, deliberate and reckless and executed with malice. Leaders of NATO and NATO member leaders are also guilty of homicide as they are all accomplices.

The law enforcement agencies of the United States know that what their leaders have done and continue to do is homicide. They have investigated untold numbers of homicide cases over the years. They know what actions are homicide and what actions are in self-defense. Those who deliberately commit homicide are arrested, incarcerated, brought before the courts, tried, sentenced and punished for their crimes. There is no difference between the actions taken by Charles Manson, OJ Simpson, Robert Pickton, John Wayne Gacy, or Ted Bundy and those taken by George W Bush, Dick Cheney, Tony Blair and now Barack Obama against the innocent people of Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. The US and UK leaders did not act out of self-defense when they planned for (premeditated) and deliberately and recklessly executed, with malice, their attacks against Iraq, Afghanistan and more recently Pakistan.


§ 24.01 Definition of Homicide

[A] Common Law and Statutory Homicide – At very early common law, “homicide” was defined as “the killing of a human being by a human being.” This definition included suicide. However, modern law defines “homicide” as “the killing of a human being by another human being.” Suicide, therefore, is no longer a form of homicide in most statutes. Homicide is divided into two crimes – murder and manslaughter.

[1] “Human Being” - The common law and majority approaches define the beginning of life as birth for purposes of interpreting the criminal homicide law. A minority of states now treat a viable – or, at times, even nonviable – fetus as a human being under the homicide statute.

Regarding the end of human life, a majority of states, either by statute or judicial decision, have incorporated “brain death” in their definition of “death.”

[2] “Murder” – The common law definition of “murder” is “the killing of a human being by another human being with malice aforethought.”

[3] “Manslaughter” – Manslaughter is “an unlawful killing of a human being by another human being without malice aforethought.”

[4] “Malice” – As the term has developed, a person kills another acts with the requisite “malice” if he possesses any one of four states of mind:

1.) the intention to kill a human being;
2.) the intention to inflict grievous bodily injury on another;
3.) an extremely reckless disregard for the value of human life; or
4.) the intention to commit a felony during the commission or attempted commission of which a death results.

[B] Model Penal Code – A person is guilty of criminal homicide under the Model Code if he unjustifiably and inexcusably takes the life of another human being [MPC § 210.0(1)] purposely, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently. [MPC § 210.1(1)] The Code recognizes three forms of criminal homicide: murder, manslaughter, and (unlike the common law) negligent homicide.

§ 24.02 Murder

[A] Degrees of Murder – At common law, there were no degrees of murder, and murder was a capital offense. Reform of the common law has resulted in the division of murder into degrees, with only murder in the first degree being a capital offense.

[B] Intent to Kill

[1] “Deliberate and Premeditated” – Typically, a murder involving the specific intent to kill is first-degree murder in jurisdictions that grade the offense by degrees if the homicide was also “deliberate” and “premeditated.”

[2] “Wilful, Deliberate, Premeditated” – Nearly all states that grade murder by degrees provide that a “wilful, deliberate, premeditated” killing is murder in the first degree.

[3] “Intent to Inflict Grievous Bodily Injury” – Malice aforethought is implied if a person intends to cause grievous bodily injury to another, but death results. In states that grade murder by degree, this form of malice nearly always constitutes second-degree murder.

[4] Extreme Recklessness (”Depraved Heart” Murder) – Malice aforethought is implied if a person’s conduct manifests an extreme indifference to the value of human life. In states that separate murder into degrees, this type of murder almost always constitutes second-degree murder.

[C] Model Penal Code – A homicide is murder if the defendant intentionally takes a life, or if he acts with extreme recklessness (i.e., depraved heart murder).

§ 24.03 Felony-Murder

[A] Common Law – At common law, a person is guilty of murder if he kills another person during the commission or attempted commission of any felony. Nearly every state retains the felony-murder rule.

[B] Statutory Law – Under most modern murder statutes, a death that results from the commission of an enumerated felony (usually a dangerous felony, such as arson, rape, robbery, or burglary) constitutes first-degree murder for which the maximum penalty is death or life imprisonment. If a death results from the commission of an unspecified felony, it is second-degree murder. The felony-murder rule authorizes strict liability for a death that results from commission of a felony.

[C] Model Penal Code – The Code also provides for felony-murder by setting forth that extreme recklessness (and, thus, murder) is presumed if the homicide occurs while the defendant is engaged in, or is an accomplice in, the commission, attempted commission, or flight from one of the dangerous felonies specified in the statute. [MPC § 210.2(1)(b)]

[D] Killing by a Non-Felon

[1] The “Agency” Approach – A majority of states that have considered the issue apply the so-called “agency” theory of felony murder, which precludes any killing committed during the commission of the felon by a person other that the defendant or his accomplices from serving as the basis for felony-murder. However, a killing by an accomplice can be imputed to others involved in the commission of the felony so that felony-murder can be charged against the non-killers.

[2] “Proximate Causation” Approach – A minority of courts apply the “proximate causation” theory of felony-murder under which a felon is liable for any death proximately resulting from the felony, whether the killer is a felon or a third party.

[3] “Provocative Act” Doctrine – A felon may be held responsible for the death of another at the hands of a third party, if the basis for the charge is not felony-murder, but instead is founded on what is sometimes termed the “provocative act” doctrine, which is simply a form of reckless homicide, e.g., a felon recklessly provokes a victim to shoot in self-defense, killing an innocent bystander.

Investment Banker Karl Schwartz lays it out as to the real reason why Afghanistan was attacked and why the United States and NATO are deliberately committing the war crime called genocide against the Taliban. Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group.

The Karl Schwartz video states:

1. The Caspian Sea Basin (Kazakstan, Turkmenistan etc.) holds between 11 and 12 trillion dollars in oil and gas resources.

2. There are only three ways to get it out:

- East to China
- West through Iran, Russia, and Turkey to Europe
- South through Afghanistan and Pakistan

3. The Taliban who controlled Afghanistan before 9/11 made pipeline deals with non-US companies and refused to change them to give control of the region’s resources to the US

The above Most Wanted Poster is a copy of the official wanted poster for bin Laden by the United States FBI. Nowhere does it state that bin Laden is wanted for the attacks of September 11, 2001. The revised November 2001 wanted poster still doesn’t state that bin Laden is wanted for the infamous attacks of 9/11. This is admissible evidence that the United States and NATO acted unlawfully when then attacked and now occupy Afghanistan. The US and NATO did not and does not have any legal justification to attack nor occupy Afghanistan. NATO is guilty of crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, war of aggression and war crimes.

The North Atlantic Treaty unequivocally declares NATO’s Afghanistan invasion and occupation illegal. The evidence clearly proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Afghanistan did not attack any NATO country including the US and Canada. The evidence clearly proves that the US, Canada and other NATO member countries are the enemy. NATO is guilty of launching an unprovoked and unlawful armed attack, a war of aggression, against the sovereign state of Afghanistan.

A war of aggression is a military conflict waged absent the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a major crime under the customary international law. The waging of aggressive war is “essentially an evil thing…to initiate a war of aggression…is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole. NATO is the aggressor who waged a war of aggression against the territoriality and political sovereignty of Afghanistan. They planned for and committed an illegal armed attack against the innocent country of Afghanistan and its people.

Afghanistan had the legal sovereign right to refuse entry into their country by any foreign state including the US. Afghanistan and its Taliban government demanded George W Bush provide proof that bin Laden was responsible for the attacks of September 11, 2001. George W Bush could not provide any proof. The US’s own FBI could not find any evidence to link bin Laden to 9/11. The FBI’s bin Laden Most Wanted Poster doesn’t even mention the attacks of September 11, 2001. On June 5, 2006, the FBI was contacted to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI was asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

NATO - The North Atlantic Treaty
Washington D.C. - 4 April 1949

The Parties to this Treaty reaffirm their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and their desire to live in peace with all peoples and all governments.

They are determined to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. They seek to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area.

They are resolved to unite their efforts for collective defense and for the preservation of peace and security. They therefore agree to this North Atlantic Treaty :

Article 1

The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.

Article 2

The Parties will contribute toward the further development of peaceful and friendly international relations by strengthening their free institutions, by bringing about a better understanding of the principles upon which these institutions are founded, and by promoting conditions of stability and well-being. They will seek to eliminate conflict in their international economic policies and will encourage economic collaboration between any or all of them.

Article 3

In order more effectively to achieve the objectives of this Treaty, the Parties, separately and jointly, by means of continuous and effective self-help and mutual aid, will maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack.

Article 4

The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened.

Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security .

Article 6 (1)

For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack:

* on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France (2), on the territory of or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer;
* on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.

Article 7

This Treaty does not affect, and shall not be interpreted as affecting in any way the rights and obligations under the Charter of the Parties which are members of the United Nations, or the primary responsibility of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security.

Article 8

Each Party declares that none of the international engagements now in force between it and any other of the Parties or any third State is in conflict with the provisions of this Treaty, and undertakes not to enter into any international engagement in conflict with this Treaty.

Article 9

The Parties hereby establish a Council, on which each of them shall be represented, to consider matters concerning the implementation of this Treaty. The Council shall be so organised as to be able to meet promptly at any time. The Council shall set up such subsidiary bodies as may be necessary; in particular it shall establish immediately a defence committee which shall recommend measures for the implementation of Articles 3 and 5.

Article 10

The Parties may, by unanimous agreement, invite any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area to accede to this Treaty. Any State so invited may become a Party to the Treaty by depositing its instrument of accession with the Government of the United States of America. The Government of the United States of America will inform each of the Parties of the deposit of each such instrument of accession.

Article 11

This Treaty shall be ratified and its provisions carried out by the Parties in accordance with their respective constitutional processes. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited as soon as possible with the Government of the United States of America, which will notify all the other signatories of each deposit. The Treaty shall enter into force between the States which have ratified it as soon as the ratifications of the majority of the signatories, including the ratifications of Belgium, Canada, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States, have been deposited and shall come into effect with respect to other States on the date of the deposit of their ratifications. (3)

Article 12

After the Treaty has been in force for ten years, or at any time thereafter, the Parties shall, if any of them so requests, consult together for the purpose of reviewing the Treaty, having regard for the factors then affecting peace and security in the North Atlantic area, including the development of universal as well as regional arrangements under the Charter of the United Nations for the maintenance of international peace and security.

Article 13

After the Treaty has been in force for twenty years, any Party may cease to be a Party one year after its notice of denunciation has been given to the Government of the United States of America, which will inform the Governments of the other Parties of the deposit of each notice of denunciation.

Article 14

This Treaty, of which the English and French texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the United States of America. Duly certified copies will be transmitted by that Government to the Governments of other signatories.

1. The definition of the territories to which Article 5 applies was revised by Article 2 of the Protocol to the North Atlantic Treaty on the accession of Greece and Turkey signed on 22 October 1951.
2. On January 16, 1963, the North Atlantic Council noted that insofar as the former Algerian Departments of France were concerned, the relevant clauses of this Treaty had become inapplicable as from July 3, 1962.
3. The Treaty came into force on 24 August 1949, after the deposition of the ratifications of all signatory states.

In 1950, the Nuremberg Tribunal defined Crimes against Peace, in Principle 6, specifically Principle VI(a), submitted to the United Nations General Assembly, as

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

During the trial, the chief American prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson, stated:

To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

There is absolutely no need to force this woman to be exposed to harmful radiation from the X-ray scanner. There is no obvious sign of a weapon or explosive being on this passenger. A simple metal detector and or pat down will confirm this. The real purpose of the airport X-ray irradiation is a government sponsored sterilization program. All part of a sinister government sponsored depopulation program.

The American people are right to make a big fuss over full body X-ray scans at airports throughout the United States. The scans have nothing to do with airport security. 99% of the time, explosives and weapons used in hijackings and bombings have been put on board an aircraft by a baggage handler or aircraft maintenance crew member. The remaining 1% can bring down an aircraft and the loss of life could be in the hundreds but that is not anywhere near the number of people who will die as the result of being irradiated (exposed to radiation) by airport scanners. Airport X-ray scans will sterilize and kill millions. The new threat is not from aircraft hijackers and bombers the new threat is from your own government. The true purpose of the scans is 2 fold - to sterilize the masses and make millions sick.

If you ever wanted to have children or to father children airports are the one place you will want to completely avoid. The X-ray machines where put in airports across the United States to intentionally sterilize every passenger that boards a plane. It does not discriminate who will be sterilized. Everyone who stands inside the X-ray zone of the scanner is being sterilized. The purpose of this is to stop the birth rate.

A small group of people have decided that you and your husband will not have any children. They decided that the population of the World has gotten too big and as the population increases so does demand for the limited supply of natural resources, food and water. Millions have been sentenced to death by airport X-ray irradiation.

X-rays have been proven to degrade the immune system of a healthy person. X-rays are what causes tumors they call cancer. Any amount of radiation exposure has an immediate effect on our health. The majority of people who have been diagnosed with cancer actually got the cancer from the X-rays. X-ray radiation destroys healthy cells. Those X-ray irradiated cells are the tumor. The X-ray destroys the cell. If exposure to X-ray radiation is repeated, more cells are destroyed. It is because of this repeated X-ray radiation exposure that cancer infected individuals eventually die. People diagnosed with cancer do not die as a result of the malignant tumors (your body’s immune system is very capable of getting rid of malignant tumors as it works to repair your body) they die as a result of the repeated exposure to acute levels of radiation from the X-rays.

If you have ever gone to the hospital and they told you that you required an X-ray, what is the first thing the X-ray technician always does? He or she will leave the room or stand behind a protective glass or shield. If X-rays are not harmful then why do the operators of those X-ray machine always take measures to protect themselves by removing themselves from the room or the immediate vicinity of the X-ray machine? Because all exposure to X-ray radiation is very dangerous.

At some point in your life you must have seen a movie depicting a hospital X-ray room. In every movie you see the actor who is portraying the technician always leaves the room that the patient and X-ray machine is in. You must have also seen and heard some mentioning of the effect X-rays have on our reproductive organs. In hospitals X-ray technicians either protect your reproductive organs by either covering them or focusing the X-ray away from them. Why do they do that? They know that any amount of X-ray radiation exposure can sterilize a person. A sterilized women cannot have children. A sterilized man cannot father children. Does the airport protect your reproduction organs? You know the answer to that. The X-rays are full body and the airport scanners are set up to focus on the mid section of the person’s body - the region where weapons are usually hidden and where your reproductive organs are. Still don’t think there is a major health risk associated with airport full body X-ray scanning? Think about it. The radiation exposure is not a casual exposure. They actually force you to stand there and be exposed to the same levels of radiation as a dirty bomb. They force you to stand there and be sterilized. If you are one of the millions of frequent fliers, you and millions of others will no longer be able to bear a child or father a child and millions like you will soon become sick and die.

THE KISSINGER REPORT - Global Depopulation Agenda - December 10 1974.

“We are going to get Global 2000 implemented, one way or another by famine, starvation, or by choice…
We need a real economic shock, a depression to get our message across.”

Investigations have uncovered a planning apparatus operating outside the control of the United States White House whose sole purpose is to reduce the world’s population by 2 billion people through war, famine, disease and any other means necessary. This apparatus, which includes various levels of the government is determining U.S. foreign policy. In every political hotspot the goal of U.S. foreign policy is now population reduction. The targeting agency for the operation is the National Security Council’s Ad Hoc Group on Population Policy. Its policy planning group is in the U.S. State Department’s Office of Population Affairs, established in 1975 by Henry Kissinger. This group drafted the Carter administration’s Global 2000 document, which calls for global population reduction.

“There is a single theme behind all our work. We must reduce population levels,” said Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA). “Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we had in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it “The professionals,” said Ferguson, “aren’t interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population-or else we will have trouble. ”

The Global 2000 Population Reduction Plan officially began during the Carter Administration - the plan stems from the “Global 2000 Report” to the President., a 800 page study submitted by the State Dept. and the Council on Environmental Quality to Carter (first printed in Great Britain in 1982). The mass genocide idea was originally started by members of the Club of Rome.

Excerpts from the first page of The Global 2000 Report to the President Carter;

Sir: In your environmental Message to the Congress of May, 1977, you directed the Council on Environmental Quality and the Department of State, working with other federal agencies, to study the “probable changes in the in the world’s population, natural resources, and environment through the end of the century.” This endeavor was to serve as the “foundation of our long-term planning.” The effort we then undertook to project present world trends and to establish a foundation for planning is now complete, and we are pleased to present our present report to you. What emerges are not predictions but rather projections developed by the U.S. Government agencies of what will happen to population, resources,
and environment if present policies continues.

Our conclusions, summarized in the pages that follow, are disturbing. They indicate the potential for global problems of alarming proportions by the year 2000. Environmental, resource, and population stresses are intensifying and will increasingly determine the quality of human life on our planet. These stresses are already sever enough to deny many people basic needs for food, shelter, health, and jobs, or any hope for betterment. At the same time, the earth’s carrying capacity — the ability of biological systems to provide resources for human needs is–eroding. The trends reflected in the Global 2000 Study suggest strongly a progressive degradation and impoverishment of the earth’s natural resource base.

If these trends are to be altered and the problems diminished, vigorous, determined new initiatives will be required worldwide to meet human needs while protecting and restoring the earth’s capacity to support life. Basic natural resources–farmlands, fisheries, forests, minerals, energy, air, and water–must be conserved and better managed. Changes in public policy are needed around the world before problems worsen and options for effective action are reduced.

“In many ways rampant population growth is an even more dangerous and subtle threat to the world than nuclear war. The commitment of government to deal with the population issue is of course essential.”

“There are only two ways of preventing a world with 10 billion inhabitants. Either the birth rate drops or the death rate will rise. There is no other way.”

There are, of course, many ways to make the death rate increase. In the thermonuclear age war can take care of this very quickly and in a definite way. Famine and disease are the oldest.” ~ Robert Mc. Namara, former U.S. Secretary of defense and former president of the World Bank

Steps are now being taken. Civil wars are somewhat drawn-out ways to reduce population. The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa or through disease like the Black Death, and the man made Avian Flu and the A-H1N1 Flu - or so they thought. The A-H1N1 virus was declared a pandemic by the WHO after the United States government intentionally infected people in Mexico with the disease that was created in the US biological weapons research and development labs at Fort Detrick, Maryland. The WHO and the US government claimed millions would die from the disease. However, the population was not easily fooled into being vaccinated with a cocktail of diseases, microorganisms and toxins - the vaccine was made to kill millions not the virus.

Kissinger initiated the Global Depopulation Agenda after discussion with leaders of the Club of Rome during the 1974 population conferences in Bucharest and Rome. The Club of Rome, controlled by Europe’s black nobility, is the primary promotion agency for the genocidal reduction of world population levels. The Ad Hoc Group was given “high priority” by the Carter administration, through the intervention of National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and Secretaries of State Cyrus Vance and Edmund Muskie.

Bill Gates advocates methods for depopulation of the World. “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, Health Care and Reproductive Health Services we can lower that (the population) by perhaps 10 or 15%.

Soon after the 1974 conference the World Health Organization went to work to find a means to kill millions of black people in Africa. They used a smallpox outbreak (one that they infected the population with in the first place) as a smoke screen for the weapon that will and has actually killed millions - both black and white people. That weapon was the smallpox vaccine that was used to infect millions with the deadly disease called HIV/AIDS. This wasn’t the first time smallpox was used as a weapon to intentionally kill a large number of people. The United States army killed off entire native American Indian tribes by lacing blankets with smallpox. Since smallpox was so successful in almost wiping out the entire native American Indian population and was successfully used to infect and kill millions with the lab created HIV/AIDS virus they now use vaccines in a coordinated Global efforts to kill millions more. Since the World Health Organization infected the World with HIV/AIDS, vaccines haves been exclusively used to sterilize the entire general population of third World countries.

To help in the depopulation process they are now causing Global sickness and diseases by irradiating all of our food. This processes is deceivingly called pasteurization. Pasteurization of any food that we eat kills the foods’ nutrients. First it was milk, then eggs, then beef and now our healing fruits and vegetables. Without the nutrients found in our naturally grown foods we will all become malnourished, and by becoming malnourished we will become sick and then die.

But there are still over 2 billion people who they claim need to be killed and killed quickly. Since the Swine Flu pandemic (A-H1N1) didn’t do as they had hope (both the World Health Organization and US president Barack Obama claimed millions would die from it, but didn’t) they are now resorting to irradiating (exposing to radiation) the Global population through unnecessary medical examinations, cell phones and cellular transmitting towers and now airport X-ray screening. Millions are being sterilized and millions will die from radiation exposure sickness and diseases.

As of November 24, 2010 over 42 million United States citizens (more than the entire population of Canada which is estimated to be 34 million) now rely on food stamp to feed themselves and their families. Over 26 million Americans are unemployed. 1.5 million Americans have lost their homes to bank foreclosures since January of this year. The United States isn’t in a recession, it is now in the midst of depression.

The World has been set on a course into a 1930s style depression by the United States Federal Reserve Bankers. They have started printing more worthless Federal Reserve Notes which they will flood the World markets with.

The privately owned Federal Reserve Bankers have begun to dispense hundreds of billions of dollars in the United States which World leaders fear will cause a cash flood and entail inflation for the World markets. World leaders are calling for the G20 nations to set up a new mechanism that effectively monitors the reckless actions of the Federal Reserve Bankers, especially when it is not able to carry out responsible currency policies.

Members of the G20 have stated that it is necessary for the Federal Reserve Banks to report to and communicate with the G20 group before it makes major policy shifts.

There has been widespread foreign condemnation of the Federal Reserve counterfeiting new Federal Reserve Notes that critics say will lower the value of the already-weak fiat currency which draws its value from the existing currency pool.

The critics say the Federal Reserve Banks in the United States has increased its counterfeit money supply at different times without any gold or silver backing for their Federal Reserve Notes, which has led to a substantial increase in inflation and generated more debt.

The bankers who illegally coin the United States money have pushed the World closer to another Great Depression by starting up their counterfeiting presses. The United States Constitution grants the coining of money only to the elected United States Congress. The U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 8 states that only - “Congress shall have Power To … To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures; To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States. According to the United States’ supreme law no other person or organization is permitted to coin the money of the United States. As the printing of money by the privately owned and unelected Federal Reserve Banks is forbidden by US law all Federal Reserve Notes are deemed by US law as counterfeits. Any person or persons who counterfeits the legal US money is guilty of a federal offense and the elected United States government, particularly the United States Congress, is bound by the United States Constitution to punish any and all counterfeiters.

According to US law the bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks are criminals for they are counterfeiters. The United States Congress knows that they are illegally coining the United States money but have done nothing to stop this gross violation of the United States Constitution. Instead they stand by as the bankers begin their latest financial scheme they call “quantitative easing” which is just a synonym for “Great Depression”. A central bank implements quantitative easing by first crediting its own account with money it creates ex nihilo (”out of nothing”). All fiat money is created out of nothing: out of thin air. It is, however, fraudulently backed by all - the sum total of - the underlying value systems in an economy, namely sound governance, sound economic policies, sound monetary policies, sound industrial policies, sound commercial policies, etc. Annual inflation above the bank´s inflation target indicates the excess of fiat money created in the banking system. The central bank then uses the worthless (remember that the money is created out of nothing) counterfeits to purchase financial assets, including government bonds, agency debt, mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds, from banks and other financial institutions in a process referred to as open market operations. The purchases, by way of account deposits, give banks the excess reserves required for them to create new money, and thus hopefully induce a stimulation of the economy, by the process of deposit multiplication from increased lending in the fractional reserve banking system. The process by which Federal Reserve Bankers inject their counterfeit paper into the banking system by way of account deposits is exactly the same process as criminals use to money launder dirty money. According to financial experts the Federal Reserve Banks’ quantitative easing will not create any new jobs. Quantitative easing will only cause an increase in inflation. Quantitative easing can trigger hyperinflation if it is improperly used, and too much money is created. It will most certainly fail if banks are still reluctant to lend money to small business and households in order to spur demands. In the context of a global market, home printed money can flood abroad and spark asset bubbles in developing economies. An increase in money supply in excess of what is required in an economy or monetary union has an inflationary effect by eroding the real value of each unit of the functional currency as well as the real value of the accounting unit of account. If devaluation of a currency is seen externally to the country it can affect the international credit rating of the country which in turn can lower the likelihood of foreign investment. With the U.S. Treasury depleted and interest rates already at zero, the Federal Reserve Bankers are putting the nail in the coffin for the United States by printing worthless Federal Reserve Notes and flooding the Global with it. The end result can only be another Great Depression as this reckless and intentional flooding of worthless Federal Reserve Notes will not only devalue the United States’ net worth it will have a global ripple effect by devaluing the currencies of foreign states.

As inflation rises the costs of living also rises and people won’t be unable to afford goods and the economy would fall into a recession. Eventually the inflation bubble gets too big (hyperinflation) and it bursts. The result is a severe recession and if goods cannot easily be sold or exchanged for cash without a substantial loss in value, a depression.


On the evening of 24 March 1999 US president Bill Clinton ordered NATO air strikes against the Yugoslav Federation. This was the first time in its 50 years of existence that NATO has taken military action against a sovereign state. Kosovo is a province of the Serb Republic of the Yugoslav Federation, and its ethnic contradictions and bloody conflicts are in the final analysis an internal affair of the Yugoslav Federation. In the US launching military attacks against a sovereign state in this fashion without UN Security Council authorization, the US and NATO violated to a serious degree the “UN Charter” and the principles of international law. Why was the western countries headed by the United States so keen on interfering in the Kosovo crisis and launch a major attack on the Yugoslav Federation?

The United States, under the Clintons (Bill and Hillary) and other western countries declared that their intervention in the Kosovo crisis is for the sake of preserving “human rights” and preventing a “genocidal” mass slaughter there, and also preventing this conflict from involving neighboring countries and threatening European security.

Are these the true facts? No.

Bill Clinton’s air strikes killed at least 10 times more civilians than the combined death toll from both sides involved in the civil war. The civil war was never an armed attack against any NATO member country and that fact alone means NATO violated its law. Then what was the US NATO hidden agenda?

Having absorbed Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary, NATO has had the insatiable desire to continue to expand toward the former Soviet Union. And the Yugoslav Federation is a state in an extremely important strategic position in the Balkans and also has good relations with Russia; it has thus become an obstacle on the road of NATO’s further eastward expansion.

Back in 1999 NATO forces waved the white flag of “peacekeeping” as it launched air strike after air strike against the civilian population of the Yugoslav Federation to forcibly occupy Kosovo. This military action had nothing to do with peacekeeping. It was launched by the US, under Bill and Hillary Clinton, to split and weaken the Yugoslav Federation and reduce Russia’s sphere of influence and establish a European security pattern dominated by NATO. This is the first strategic conspiracy of the United States government to use NATO to launch wars that “fit” the US foreign policies and agenda in contradiction and contravention of the UN Charter and Intentional Laws and treaties.

Then US Secretary of Defense Cohen has said that NATO’s credibility was on the line in Kosovo. Why did he say that? After the end of the Cold War, NATO should have died a natural death following the demise of the Warsaw Pact. Yet in addition to ceaselessly expanding eastward, NATO also wants to formulate a so-called new strategy of development in the next century, and the core of this new strategy is to expand NATO’s functions and scope and to intervene militarily, without UN authorization, in all crises outside NATO’s defense area that are held to threaten the security of the alliance. NATO held a summit in Washington in April 1999 (at the request of US President Clinton) where this new strategy was discussed, and the Kosovo civil war (not the international crisis that Bill and Hillary Clinton claimed) become a “touchstone” for the United States to test this new strategy.

Since the end of the cold war, it has been the consistent aim of the United States to establish a one-pole world dominated by itself. Former US Secretary of State Albright said undisguisedly, regarding the Kosovo peace accord, that it would be “a table without legs” unless there were troops stationed there. That meant that if the Yugoslav Federation signs the peace accord, NATO forces will enter Kosovo without firing a shot; and if the Yugoslav Federation refused to sign, NATO forces will fight their way into Kosovo — no matter whether the accord is reached or not, NATO troops will enter and occupy Kosovo.

Having occupied Kosovo NATO forces could directly press up to the CIS (The Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is a regional organization whose participating countries are former Soviet Republics, formed during the break up of the Soviet Union.), dismantle Russian control over the CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States), and then directly insert NATO force southward into the Middle East. In this way the road would be open for the United States to use NATO to intervene militarily throughout the globe and dominate the world. NATO’s military interventions in Kosovo and now Afghanistan were driven entirely by US interests. This is the most important US strategic conspiracy in the US launching air strikes against the Yugoslav Federation. NATO’s involvement in the illegal attack and occupation of Afghanistan is it’s second move against Russia. Only after US and NATO forces were on the ground in Afghanistan could the US dare to move and take control of the Middle East oil. Now that US and NATO forces were on the ground in Afghanistan the US launched an attack on Iraq in March of 2003.

Even though US president Barry (Barrack isn’t his legal name) Obama promised to withdraw US troops from Iraq immediately after he was elected president that has not happened. He has broken the promise that gave him the White House. Why did he break his promise to the people of the United States? The US domination agenda. Obama hasn’t withdrawn all troops from Iraq as he had promised in order to get elected. The only withdrawal is from the Iraqi streets to the massive US permanent bases that shadows every major Iraqi metropolitan area.

Instead of a withdrawal as promised Obama has also increased the number of troops in Afghanistan. Obama didn’t bring the US troops home he moved the troops from one war torn region to another - from Iraq to Afghanistan. He did this for one reason. Another war. As I write this article the United States government is planning for another war of aggression. Several sources within Obama’s own administration and the US military have revealed that the US is planning to attack Iran. The troops in Iraq are going to be used by the US government to launch a future unprovoked war of aggression against Iran. Obama told congressional leaders in February of 2009 that he’s planning to pull all combat troops out of Iraq by August 2010. August 2010 has come and gone and tens of thousands of US troops are still in Iraq. Obama didn’t keep his promise to the American people.

Obama and the US government needs more US and NATO troops in Afghanistan not to fight the Taliban but to fight Russia should Russia protect it’s ally and interests in Iran. The US is also presently arming Taiwan to the teeth because China has major contracts with Iran and when the US attacks Iran the US expects Taiwan to keep China busy.

When you stop and look at the: increase in US and NATO troops in Afghanistan, the deployment of US tanks to Afghanistan for the first time in the entire war, the renewed rhetoric and threats by the US against Iran, the US arming of Taiwan despite China’s repeated formal protests, the installation of a missile defense shield throughout Europe and the US and NATO arming former Soviet block countries it becomes obvious that the US is planning to start another World War. The US attack on Iran, either directly or through Israel, will start WWIII.

The US government intentionally wants to start a World War. Why? So that the US government, both Democrats and Republicans, won’t go down in history as the ones who bankrupted the US through both parties’ involvement in the US Federal Reserve robbery of the United States and its people. The embarrassment, the shame and the indictments against US government officials, from both parties, including Mr Obama, is what they want to avoid. Starting another World War is their get out of jail free card. As soon as one US state after another declares bankruptcy the US government will have lost its hidden agenda of World domination. The US government believes that the time is now to make its move. Before the American people find out just what their government did to their country. George HW Bush was quoted saying: “if the American people ever find out what we have done, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us.”


On May 28, 2008 oil fortune heir William “Bill” Phillips wrote in regards to “Big Oil”: Did you know that the United States does NOT have any big oil companies. It’s true: the largest American oil company, Exxon Mobil, is only the 14th largest in the world, and is dwarfed by the really big oil companies–all owned by foreign governments or government-sponsored monopolies–that dominate the world’s oil supply.

With 94% of the world’s oil supply locked up by foreign governments, most of which are hostile to the United States, the relatively puny American oil companies do not have access to enough crude oil to significantly affect the market and help bring prices down. Thus, ExxonMobil, a “small” oil company, buys 90% of the crude oil that it refines for the U.S. market from the big players, i.e, mostly-hostile foreign governments. The price at the U.S. pump is rising because the price the big oil companies charge ExxonMobil and the other small American companies for crude oil is going up as the value of the American dollar goes down. They will eventually bleed this country into printing even more money and we will go into runway inflation once again as we did under the Carter Democratic reign.

This is obviously a tough situation for the American consumer. The irony is that it doesn’t have to be that way. The United States–unlike, say, France–actually has vast petroleum reserves. It would be possible for American oil companies to develop those reserves, play a far bigger role in international markets, and deliver gas at the pump to American consumers at a much lower price, while creating many thousands of jobs for Americans. This would be infinitely preferable to shipping endless billions of dollars to Saudi Arabia, Russia and Venezuela to be used in propping up their economies.

So, why doesn’t it happen? Because the Democrat Party–aided, sadly, by a handful of Republicans–deliberately keeps gas prices high and our domestic oil companies small by putting most of our reserves off limits to development. China is now drilling in the Caribbean, off Cuba but our own companies are barred by law from developing large oil fields off the coasts of Florida and California. Enormous oil-shale deposits in the Rocky Mountain states could go a long way toward supplying American consumers’ needs, but the Democratic Congress won’t allow those resources to be developed. ANWR contains vast petroleum reserves, but we don’t know how vast, because Congress, not wanting the American people to know how badly its policies are hurting our economy, has made it illegal to explore and map those reserves, let alone develop them.

In short, all Americans are paying a terrible price for the Democrat’s perverse energy policies. I own some small interests in tiny, 4 barrel- per-day oil wells in Wyoming. We have 14 agencies that have iron-hand jurisdiction over us. If we drop any oil on the ground when the refinery truck comes to pick up oil from our holding tanks, we are fined. Yet down the road the state will spray thousands of gallons of used oil on a dirt road to control dirt. When it rains that oil runs into rivers and creeks. Yet a cup of oil on the ground at our wellhead is a $50,000 EPA fine plus additional fines from state regulating agencies. They treat oil as if it were plutonium that has the potential to leak into the environment. We are fined if our dirt burmsare not high enough around a holding tank, yet the truck that picks up our oil runs down the road at 60 mph with no burm around it. People wonder why there is no more exploration in this country. It’s because of the regulators; those people who have lived their whole lives doing nothing but imposing fines on small operators like us for doing mostly nothing.

So, America enjoy your $4.00 per gallon gasoline. Your dollar is now worth 0.62 Euro-Cents. The lack of American production of GNP, the massive trade deficit (as labor markets have moved overseas to fight insanely high union imposed labor costs in America) and the run away printing of money (backed by nothing of value here in America) has caused the dollar to become more worthless on the international market. And that’s where our oil comes from. It’s paid for with dollars that become more worthless everyday. If we had just kept par with the Euro we’d be paying $62 dollars per barrel for oil (42 gallons) or about $1.50 instead of $2.50 a gallon for crude oil.

What the US government also does not tell you is that it is the leaseholder and royalty recipient of most oil production and receives 25% of the gross oil sales before we pay for electricity to lift the oil, propane to keep the oil-water separators from freezing in the winters. We pay a pumper to visit each well everyday plus we have equipment failures all the time. We pay for that out of our 75% of gross sales. The government does not share in any expenses to run any production well. So, if the Big Oil Companies are making record profits, then so is the federal government from it’s 25% tax on every molecule of oil sold to a refinery in this country. Why isn’t the government on the stand for “Record” profits? What you don’t see is this 25% of the sales price of crude oil being siphoned away by the government. That money plus the road taxes, state taxes, etc. amounts to over $1 per gallon of gasoline you are buying while the governments only admit to about 50 cents per gallon.

To all you Democrats, when you go vote for your candidate, a blazing liberal like Barrack Hussein Obama or Hillary Clinton, just keep in mind that their liberal spending habits will further decrease the value of the American dollar on the world market and your gasoline costs will hike even higher. As they introduce more give-away programs, raise taxes on everyone to pay people not to produce or work, your dollar will continue to dwindle on the world market and you will be paying $10.00 per gallon at the next election. Cheap hydrocarbon fuel is all over. Enjoy! Enjoy the fruits of your decision to elect these folks when you are there in that voting booth and you stab your pin through a Democrat’s name.”

Bill Phillips Sr. spent nearly 50 years in the US oil and gas industry; most of his career was with the Phillips Petroleum Company. Bill is a descendant of Frank Phillips. Frank Phillips, along with his brother Lee Eldas (L.E.) Phillips, Sr., founded the original Phillips Petroleum Company in 1917 in Bartlesville, OK. Phillips Petroleum Company merged with Conoco, Inc. in 2002 to form the current ConocoPhillips oil company. ConocoPhillips has established a giant operation at Fort McMurray, in the tar sands of Alberta in Canada., to extract what environmentalists are calling “the dirtiest and most carbon-intensive oil on Earth”. In August of 2009 Obama’s US state department approved a multi-billion dollar pipeline to take the Canadian oil to the American midwest. About 1.8m barrels of it every day by 2015.

On Wednesday August 11, 2010 William “Bill” Phillips and Sen. Ted Stevens, of Anchorage, Alaska were both assassinated by the Obama government. The plane they were in was brought down by a EMP pulse beam from the United States Air Force’s star wars weapon, a weapon of mass destruction called HAARP.


The Nazi SS war criminal formed NATO has made it official that it will continue to murder and torture the innocent people of Afghanistan for years to come. The army of the Nazi Fourth Reich is now firmly established. Afghanistan is to become its base for future military operations. It will use the proceeds from the illegal Opium drug cultivation and trade to finance its illegal wars of aggression against free nations. Heroin will also be used to assimilate millions around the World. It is the weapon of choice for the new Nazi SS organization called NATO to conquer the World. Heroin will make the population of the free World weak and compliant. It will help make the populations of the free World delusional so that the Fourth Reich can grow and form a new Aryan empire.

Nazism is still very much alive today. They have been plotting to take over the world and enslave non-Aryan peoples since 4 April 1949 with the formation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Before the Nazi SS could form NATO they destroyed the organization that was responsible for defeating them in World War II - the League of Nations, and replaced it with their own called the United Nations. Through NATO and the United Nations they are plotting to take over the World in plain sight of the World leaders. They have taken over all of Europe yet nobody seems to realize that they have been conquered and now occupied. They conquered Europe without firing a shot. They conquered all of Europe financially. The European Union was and is a Nazi ideology. The European Common Market, the precursor to the European Union, was a brainchild of top Nazis in the 1940’s who wanted to preserve fascist power in the event of defeat in world war two.

A March 2010 proposal by France and Germany to create a federal European economic government in the name of mandating fiscal responsibility and avoiding a repeat of the turmoil in Greece chillingly mirrors similar plans put forward by top Nazis in the 1940’s as a means of preserving fascist power at the end of world war two .

US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128, also known as The Red House Report, details how top Nazis secretly met at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944 and, knowing Germany was on the brink of military defeat, conspired to create a Fourth Reich – a pan-European economic empire based around a European common market, precisely what the new German-French proposal calls for.

Wealthy Nazi industrialists like Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, as well as front companies set about the task of building a new pan-European business empire. According to historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave laborers, “For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler….The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.”

One such figure was banking titan Hermann Abs, who joined board of Deutsche Bank during the rise of Nazis, also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, the company that made the Zyklon B gas used to kill concentration camp victims. “Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid – reconstruction funds – to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany’s economic recovery,” writes author Adam Lebor.

“Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.”

The European League for Economic Co-operation developed policies for European integration that almost mirrored those proposed by Nazis just years previously.

In his book “Europe’s Full Circle,” Rodney Atkinson provides a list of policies proposed by Nazis and their similarity to today’s European Union (listed in bold letters).

* Europaische Wirtshaftsgemeinschaft - European Economic Community
* European Currency System - European Exchange Rate Mechanism
* Europabank (Berlin) - European Central Bank (Frankfurt)
* European Regional Principle - Committee of the Regions
* Common Labour Policy - Social Chapter
* Economic and Trading Agreements - Single Market

The Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass.

Today’s drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich – an economic rather than military imperium.”

Nazism and the EU have some very disturbing parallels. Indeed, the two are fundamentally intertwined and the origins of the EU can be traced directly back to the Nazis. No wonder therefore that years later, the march towards a federal European superstate with a centrally planned economy run by unelected bureaucrats is coming to fruition.

The foundations for the EU and ultimately the Euro single currency were laid by the secretive Bilderberg Group in the mid-1950’s. Bilderberg’s own leaked documents prove that the agenda to create a European common market and a single currency were formulated by Bilderberg in 1955. One of the group’s principle founders was H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, a former Nazi SS officer.

But the ideological framework for the European Union goes back even further, to the 1940’s when top Nazi economists and academics outlined the plan for a single European economic community, an agenda that was duly followed after the end of the second world war.

In his 1940 book The European Community, Nazi Economics Minister and war criminal Walther Funk wrote about the need to create a “Central European Union” and “European Economic Area” and for fixed exchange rates, stating “No nation in Europe can achieve on its own the highest level of economic freedom which is compatible with all social requirements…The formation of very large economic areas follows a natural law of development….interstate agreements in Europe will control [economic forces generally]…There must be a readiness to subordinate one’s own interests in certain cases to those of [the EC].”

How different is Funk’s call for governments to subordinate their economic interests to those of Europe compared with current EU leaders’ insistence that EU member states should be forced to “institute structural reforms under pain of financial sanctions”? The similarity is frightening.

Funk’s co-authors echoed his sentiments. Nazi academic Heinrich Hunke wrote, “Classic national dead…community of fate which is the European economy…fate and extent of European co-operation depends on a new unity economic plan”.

A “new unity economic plan,” this is precisely what France and Germany are proposing – centralized financial control over the economies of Europe ruled by Brussels (headquarters of the new Nazi SS Fourth Reich called NATO).

Fellow Nazi Gustav Koenig observed, “We have a real European Community task before us…I am convinced that this Community effort will last beyond the end of the war.”

In 1940, Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels ordered the creation of the “large-scale economic unification of Europe,” believing that “in fifty years’ time people would no longer think in terms of countries.” Today, the Nazi European Union has been established.

The corporate owned media perpetuates the myth that the danger of the Third Reich purportedly ended in 1945 with flimsily documented events like Hitler’s death; Germany’s capitulation and subsequent partition for 44 years; the capture of the Nazi regime’s surviving leaders and their suicides or imprisonment or execution after the Nuremberg trials; and the decades-long search for Nazi escapees.

Just take a quick look around the Internet and you will find clear evidence of the Nazis’ survival. These include the insidious “Operation Paperclip” in which Nazi scientists were secreted away and the Gestapo who created the CIA and the “Boys from Brazil” secret defection of Nazis to South America.

The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration - in other words the European Union that has now conquered Europe. Now that Europe is conquered and the armed forces of the assimilated countries are now under the control of the Nazi EU, their military called NATO is now massing along the Russian border.

This past week the United States government announced that it was sending tanks to Afghanistan. The official story line is that they will be used to fight the Afghanistan Resistance fighters. The truth is that the Nazi Fourth Reich is building a new Waffen-SS army of foreign conscripts (International Security Assistance Force) to fight a battle against Russia. The most sophisticated tanks in the United States Army are not being shipped in numbers to fight poorly armed Afghan freedom fighters, they are being sent to battle Russian tanks. Afghanistan has become the battleground of the Fourth Reich.


Search-and-rescue teams have found the wreckage of a F-22 aircraft that went missing on October 16, 2010. The body of Air Force Capt. Jeffrey Haney, who was assigned to the 525th Fighter Squadron, 3rd Wing has not been found but the United States Air Force has declared that Haney “did not eject from the aircraft prior to impact”.

A recovery team found part of the ejection seat and several life support items that Haney wore during the flight. The Air Force stated that “If a pilot was able to eject, the seat would go with him and it would not be anywhere at or near the site”. Several military pilots have rebuked the Air Force’s official statement saying that whenever a pilot is forced to eject the ejection seat and pilot will aways land very near to or even within the crash site of the aircraft. They have stated that the proof has been seen by the general public on numerous occasions at air shows where a pilot ejected from his military aircraft just seconds before the crash. The pilot has always been seen landing in close proximity to the crash site and some have even landed within the burning debris of the crashed military jet.

Why would the Air Force make statements that they know are not true? If Haney went down with the F-22 and parts of the ejection seat and several life support items that Haney wore during the flight were found at the crash site then Haney’s body would also have been found. The fact that they declared that his body has not been found means that he successfully ejected. The mission that was given to Air Force Capt. Jeffrey Haney had failed and the Air Force is now attempting to keep it a secret. By stating that Haney had died in the crash immediately ends all participation from groups outside of the Air Force - including both military and civilian search and rescue teams. Finding Haney now becomes the job of the United States Air Force with no civilian oversight. If Haney did successfully eject from the aircraft and left the crash site, as is confirmed with the finding of his ejection seat, then search and rescue is still obligated to continue searching until he is found. By declaring he died in the crash the Air Force takes over and the crash site and information as to how the crash occurred and the recovery of Air Force Capt. Jeffrey Haney becomes classified.

The job of the 525th Fighter Squadron, 3rd Wing “is to clear the skies of enemy aircraft, as well as take out any surface-to-air missiles that would deny us access to enemy airspace” - Lt. Col. Chuck Corcoran. What was Air Force Capt. Jeffrey Haney mission on Tuesday October, 16, 2010? Was he tasked to take out a surface-to-air missile site? We may never know as his mission failed and his F-22 stealth aircraft crashed. In the meantime let us look at what military targets exists within Haney’s flight path.

The F-22 fifth-generation fighter aircraft that uses stealth technology was found about 100 miles east north east of Anchorage, Alaska near Denali National Park. 180 miles North of Anchorage, Alaska and approximately 8 miles north of Gakona, Alaska is the HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) transmitter site. HAARP, also known as Project Woodpecker, is an illegal military installation that uses an Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating Method to “alter the earth’s magnetic field … in order to modify weather, create or trigger earthquakes and volcanoes, spread viruses, create an electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and, to modify behavior control among the populous.”

This transmitter site is believed to be “large enough to cover most of the Northern Hemisphere.” Operated by the Department of the Navy, Department of the Air Force and the University of Alaska, it is also believed to be only one of a number of such sites–known as Ionospheric Research Instruments that are “scattered around the world,… many of them here in the U.S.”, which are capable of connecting with a much smaller GWEN (Ground Wave Emergency Network), which comprises “remotely controlled transmitter sites that have been built all over the U.S. in a grid pattern, with their antennas spaced about every 200 miles or so.”

The HAARP project was developed in the 1950’s as the result of atmospheric hydrogen bomb tests. These tests created localized disruptions of the ionosphere that lasted for some period of weeks or months and possibly years. Another byproduct of the tests was a brief but powerful emission of high speed particles now known as an Electro Magnetic Pulse (EMP). Later on It was determined that the resultant stream of high speed Beta particles of the EMP were capable of destroying electronic equipment well outside of the blast zone. For the purposes of space warfare, the problem then was to recreate the effects of the thermonuclear blast without detonating a bomb. The final design for a missile defense system proposed introducing high power low frequency radio waves into the ionosphere using a technique called circular polarization. This creates streams of high speed beta particles that move along the magnetic field lines as well as stream out into space and back again.

Portions of the patent for the system used at the HAARP facility, (located in Gakona, Alaska), specifically describe it as a missile defense system. The patent can be viewed and downloaded at the US Patent Office website, US Patent 5,038,664. The text of the patent states, “The plasma will be contained within adjacent [magnetic] field lines and will drift to form a shell of relativistic particles around a portion of the earth”. A breakdown of the technical discussion contained in the patent explains how such an effect is produced as follows. Electromagnetic radiation of a given frequency, (1800 to 3600 kHz) transmitted to a region of the atmosphere with an altitude of at least 250 km in conjunction with another region of the atmosphere with an altitude of 1500 km receiving electromagnetic radiation of with a frequency of (20 to 1800 kHz) sets up the required field. This excitation sustained for 20 minutes causes electrons or beta particles to travel back and forth between the two regions at nearly the speed of light. These two regions then have a natural tendency to spread out creating the shell of relativistic particles. Another statement in the patent expresses the usefulness of this shell, “…wherein said shell is formed as an anti-missile shield”. It has been shown that an object, such as a missile, (or aircraft) passing through a field of relativistic particles such as that described here will almost certainly suffer significant damage. Examples of this damage would be burn through of the outer skin, severe damage to electronic components (even those that are shielded) and the possible ignition of explosives such as the warhead trigger. Most vehicles (including both land vehicles and aircraft) passing through such a field would probably see all three types of damage. Far more detailed explanations are contained in the patent.

When operating in missile defense mode the HAARP transmitter broadcasts high power low frequency radio waves in the circular polarization pattern described in the patent. Any missile or aircraft attempting to fly through a HAARP generated region of high speed particles would result in damage or destruction of its electronics and guidance systems rendering the missile or aircraft unable to reach its target or possibly causing it to burn up. At the very least the rocket engines for the nuclear warhead or the jet engines of the aircraft would be knocked out causing the missile or aircraft to crash before they could reach their target. Many of the details of this technology can by found by Google searching the internet. The official website for the HAARP project is at,

Link between HAARP and the F-22 crash

The Air Force did not mention that Air Force Capt. Jeffrey Haney radioed that he was experiencing any problems with his F-22 - a Lockheed Martin twin-engine fighter equipped with stealth technology. The official statement from the Air Force is that he and his aircraft went missing. No distress call was mentioned being sent. That suggests Force Capt. Jeffrey Haney was on a mission and all radio communication was prohibited. With all twin-engine military aircraft the aircraft would have to have suffered a complete system failure for a crash to occur. The F-22’s twin-engines were specifically ordered part of the design so that in case of one engine failure the aircraft could return to base flying or continue its mission with the other engine. A complete system failure can only occur if the aircraft was targeted with a EMP, like the one used by HAARP which was just 80 miles dead ahead of the crash site. It takes a F-22 fighter jet just a few minutes to cover 80 miles. Lockheed Martin has stated that with afterburners, a F-22 can reach a top speed in excess of 1,317 mph or 21.95 miles per minute. With afterburners Haney could have reached the HAARP site in just under 4 minutes had he not been shot down.


After studying the Haiti quake data for the past 10 months, officials are more convinced than ever that Haitians can expect another major quake sooner rather than later. That’s largely because they’ve found, according to a new study by 10 prominent geologists, that the lion’s share of the January temblor occurred not along the fault line they originally suspected, known as the Enriquillo–Plantain Garden fault zone, but on a previously unknown fault. (Faults separate plates in the earth’s crust, which cause quakes when stress makes them collide.)

When geologists started poring over information from the earthquake’s satellite-radar images last January, they were flummoxed by a variety of features. One was the vertical motion the quake exhibited — unusual because the Enriquillo, which runs across Haiti’s southern peninsula just below Port-au-Prince, is a strike-slip fault, the kind that almost exclusively displays horizontal motion when it ruptures. At the same time, the quake’s horizontal movement was partly north-south, another anomaly for a strike-slip fault. “Those were the two important smoking guns” that made scientists question their early assumptions about the quake, says Eric Calais, a Purdue University geologist who is in Haiti as a science adviser to the U.N. Development Program and is a lead author of the study, which was published last month in Nature Geoscience.

There were others. Why, for example, did the earthquake’s rupture not reach the surface, despite its strength? And, perhaps most important, why did so little of the Enriquillo fault itself seem to rupture? The answer is that a new previously unmapped fault line simply formed parallel to the Enriquillo fault. One they’ve now identified and named the Léogâne, for the city west of Port-au-Prince where the quake had its epicenter. The Léogâne fault is a combination of a strike-slip and a thrust fault (which helps explain the vertical motion and other unnatural behavior) and was responsible for about 85% or more of the quake’s energy.

Before January, the Haiti fault hadn’t had a major rupture since 1751. Scientists have observed that only the western half of the segment that broke in 1751 came apart this time, meaning the eastern portion — closest to Port-au-Prince — is now likely a geological hair trigger. In fact, the discovery of the previously unknown and unmapped Léogâne fault, as geologists like Amelung suggest, may mean things are more dangerous than previously imagined, since it indicates the Enriquillo spent even less of its own energy in the January earthquake than they had assumed.

Geologists are dumbfounded as to how the January earthquake could have even occurred being that the earthquake didn’t occur at the Earth crust’s weakest point - at the Enriquillo–Plantain Garden fault zone. Instead it occurred where there was no fault line. What can cause an earthquake in a region where there exists not fault line? The unnatural characteristics of the Haiti earthquake suggests a man made earthquake from either an underground nuclear detonation or the result of the United States’ weapon of mass destruction called HAARP - HAARP is a weapon that can not only modify the Earth’s weather and create major storms, heat waves, monsoons and hurricanes it can also severely disturb the natural electromagnetic field of Earth and create artificial earthquakes . HAARP is an Air Force installation with powerful transmitters that are interfering with, overriding and blanking out earth’s natural magnetic field. For the first time in human history, an ever-increasing number of artificial ELF and VLF vibrations are disrupting earth’s natural internal and external electromagnetic systems (which help to maintain planetary rotation, balance and stability).

The January 1978 issue of the Specula Magazine described the goal of the United States weapon of mass destruction program called HAARP.

“An electromagnetic signal of certain frequencies can be transmitted through the earth which, when introduced into the earth at certain multiples of 30 degrees, will form standing waves in the earth itself. In certain incidence angle cases, the standing wave also induces a strange phenomenon: coherence to the standing wave is formed in the molten core of the earth itself, and a tiny fraction of the vast, surging electromagnetic currents of the liquid core begin to feed into and augment the induced standing wave.

“At this point, one has established a sort of giant triode: the inducing signal one is putting into the earth is the grid signal, and the vast energy in the molten core of the earth is the cathode and power supply. The established coherence serves as an amplification factor for the grid signal, and much more energy is now present in the standing wave than the miniscule amount being fed in from the earth’s surface. By interferometer type techniques, multiple ‘giant resonance’ waves of this type can be combined so that a ‘beam’ or focused effect of very great energy exists inside the earth.

“Depending on the frequency, focusing, wave shape, etc. one can …induce a variety of effects such as earthquakes, induced at a distant aiming point, severe disturbances in the middle and upper atmosphere over the target area…and anomalous weather effects. This is called the Tesla effect.”

On October 9, 2006 North Korea detonated a nuclear device underground which the U.S. Geological Survey recorded an earthquake at 4.2 on the Richter scale. The Seismic yield of the Nagasaki atomic bomb created an earth tremor of a 5.0 Richter Magnitude. The largest nuclear weapons ever tested, a hydrogen bomb called the Tsar-bomb created an earth tremor of a 5.0 to 5.25 Richter Magnitude and an energy yield of around 7.1 on the Richter scale. It was only because the bomb was detonated in the air rather than underground, that most of the energy was not converted to seismic waves. Given this data on how detonation of bombs of mass destruction always produces Earth tremors of between 5.0 and 7.1 Reichter magnitude, it is technologically possible to create a man made earthquake of the magnitude that shook Haiti. An underground nuclear detonation would create a new fault and it would also account for the unnatural behavior of he Haiti earthquake. Geologists have stated that the Haiti earthquake occurred as a combination of a strike-slip (horizontal motion) and a thrust fault (vertical rupture). All nuclear detonations have both a horizontal and a vertical shock wave motion. All nuclear detonation leave evidence a detonation in the form of a crater. The new fault in the Earth’s crust was created when the earth above the detonation caved in.

Another mystery and anomaly in regards to the Haiti earthquake was the fact that there were no warning tremors prior to this major earthquake. The earthquake happened suddenly, violently and quickly - as do all nuclear detonations.

What are Canadians saying when they display bumper stickers that say “I support our troops”? They are stating that they support war. They are stating that they support the unlawful killing of the innocent people of Afghanistan. They are stating they support the killing of little Afghani girls and boys and their mothers. They state that they support wars of aggression. They are stating that they do not want peace. They are stating that they want the death and destruction to continue. Why are they stating all this? Because we are the enemy. We attacked them. Canada and all Canadians has the blood of the innocent on our hands. I challenge all true Christians to go through your Bible and look for what God says about the shedding of innocent blood. God will forgive a lot of things, but there is a price that is paid by the individual and the nation for that sin. “Do this so that innocent blood will not be shed in your land, which the LORD your God is giving you as your inheritance, and so that you will not be guilty of bloodshed.” (Deuteronomy 19:10). According to Islam it is a great sin to kill an innocent person. Killing one innocent person is regarded as equivalent to killing all of mankind. Every Christian and Jew knows the Ten Commandments (a list of religious and moral imperatives that were given to us by God). What does it say about killing? What does it say about lying? According to the Ten Commandments it is a great sin for any Christian or Jew to kill or lie.

Not one Canadian has sense enough to realize that our troops are killing the innocent people of Afghanistan and their duly elected Taliban ruling party. The Taliban has never been a terrorist organization. Taliban is the name of an Afghanistan political party much like Canada has Liberals, Conservatives and NDP political parties. The Afghanistan people and their Taliban ruling party have not attacked us, we attacked them. They have not killed our women and children we have killed their women and children.

When did you decide to become war mongers instead of peace keepers? When did you become baby killers? You are free. They are not. Your supporting of our troops gives your government justification and approval to keep sending our troops to continue to kill those innocent people, people who did not attack us or cause us any harm and who were no threat to us. We murdered them for what reason? They are not and never were a threat to us or any other country. They are very poor. They have no military because they are so poor as a nation. If they had a military we would not be there, the US would most definitely not be there because the US only cowardly attacks poor and defenseless nations.

Do you want to know the truth as to to why the Afghan people and their Taliban ruling party are killing our troops? Can you handle the truth? Can you accept the truth? They kill our troops because they are defending their country and people from our unlawful attacks and occupation. They are the patriotic ones. They are killing our troops to regain their freedom, a freedom that you all obviously take for granted. What would you do if you were attacked? You would fight back. They are not the enemy, we are the enemy.

The Canadian government’s website states that Canadian troops are in Afghanistan for the following reason:

We are there with more than 50 other nations and international organizations, at the request of the democratically-elected Afghan government and as part of a UN-mandated, NATO-led mission.

Least we forget Canada got involved in the “illegal” attack and war against Afghanistan at the request of the US government. The US illegally attacked Afghanistan to overthrown their democratically elected Taliban government. It wasn’t Muslim extremists who made the decision to help bring the Taliban to power in the mid-1990s: it was the US government who did that, on the theory that the Taliban political party would help bring stability to Afghanistan. The US was responsible for the Taliban being the governing body of Afghanistan because the Taliban fought the US proxy war against the Soviet Union. The Taliban and bin Laden successfully drove out the Soviet Union from Afghanistan with the full support of the US government. The US financed what is now known as the Taliban (made up of Afghanistan nationalists) and Al Qaeda (made up of CIA financed, trained and controlled foreign mercenaries). The US provided the Taliban “freedom fighters” with shoulder fired stinger missiles, heavy machine guns and anti-tank weaponry. Without these weapons the Soviet Union would not have been driven out.

Proclamation 5034 — Afghanistan Day, 1983
By the Ronald Reagan - President of the United States of America, 21 March 1983

The tragedy of Afghanistan continues as the valiant and courageous Afghan freedom fighters [The Taliban] persevere in standing up against the brutal power of the Soviet invasion and occupation. The Afghan people are struggling to reclaim their freedom, which was taken from them when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in December of 1979.

In this three-year period the Soviet Union has been unable to subjugate Afghanistan. The Soviet forces are pitted against an extraordinary people who, in their determination to preserve the character of their ancient land, have organized an effective and still spreading country-wide resistance. The resistance of the Afghan freedom fighters is an example to all the world of the invincibility of the ideals we in this country hold most dear, the ideals of freedom and independence.

Canada’s mission in Afghanistan is not about rebuilding, or democracy, or freedom or any number of other excuses given by the government, it is about Canada’s wilful participation in a war of aggression against a nation that did not attack Canada, the US or any other nation. They are willing participants in a war crime. They are engaging in the mass murder of the innocent people of Afghanistan. Afghanistan did not have any hijackers involved in the criminal hijackings of US commercial airlines, on US soil, on September 11, 2001. Canada is there at the request of the US government. There is no democratically elected government in Afghanistan as Afghanistan is under military occupation. There can be no democracy without self-governing. There can be no democracy while under military occupation by the US, Canada and other NATO states.

The US imposed leader of occupied Afghanistan was and is an agent of the US government. The CIA played a key role in the rise to power of US imposed president Hamid Karzai, according to a new publication in the Netherlands. After the events of 9/11, Hamid Karzai entered Afghanistan from Pakistan in the first week of October on a motorcycle and headed for Uruzgan province, where many of his supporters of the Popolzai tribe lived. Dutch journalist Bette Dam reveals in her book ‘Expedition Uruzgan’* that Karzai’s ‘luggage’ included a satellite phone and a large sum of money provided by the CIA. Karzai and a small group of armed supporters moved to the hamlet of Durji, to the Northwest of the provincial capital Tarin Kowt. Karzai had described Uruzgan province as a pivotal stronghold. But so it was for the Taliban.

The ruling Taliban soon got word of Hamid Karzai’s whereabouts. The CIA subsequently organised an emergency evacuation operation by helicopter and flew the future president to the safety of Jacobabad Airbase in Pakistan. Karzai was quickly sent back to Afghanistan to Durji, this time with the support of a 12-men team (ODA-574) made up of US Special Forces and a CIA team of some six men, of the covert ‘Special Activities Division‘. The book identifies the leader of the team as ‘Graig’, and describes in detail the contacts between Hamid Karzai, Washington, and the CIA station in Islamabad (Pakistan) prior and during the uprising.

By late November, key pro-US leaders from Afghanistan met near Bonn (Germany) and decided, “under strong pressure from the US”, to appoint (the people of Afghanistan never had a say through a vote) Hamid Karzai as interim president of the country. CIA paid Hamid Karzai participated in the meeting via his satellite telephone while still in Uruzgan province. Hamid Karzai’s US appointment as their president for Afghanistan was almost and prematurely finished on December 5th, 2001, when a US bomber dropped a 2,000lbs guided bomb on ‘friendly’ positions north of Kandahar, killing three Green Berets (including two members of ODA-574) and numerous Afghan fighters. Karzai escaped death and was only slightly injured.

We are the enemy. We attacked them without the justification of self-defense.

The Canadian mission in Afghanistan is illegal according to the UN Charter, Canadian Law, US Law and International Law. A war of aggression is a military conflict waged absent the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a crime under the customary international law.

The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, called the waging of aggressive war “essentially an evil thing…to initiate a war of aggression…is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

The President of the US swears to “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution (article VI, paragraph 2) states: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land.”

One of the most important treaties that the U.S. is signatory to is one governing when a nation may go to war. After 20th century wars that killed over 100 million human beings, the UN was formed to eliminate war as a foreign policy option The UN Charter is registered in the US State Department as a Treaty in Force.

Therefore, one of the most important Constitutional duties of any US President is to follow the law to not unleash the world’s most powerful destructive force. It is therefore the duty of the U.S. president to defend innocent countries and their civilian population from such onslaught and misery. This is also one of the most important laws for citizens to understand and hold their political leadership accountable for ethical behavior and demand prosecution in its violation.

On August 17, 2009 President Obama again defended the US invasion of Afghanistan. He called it “fundamental to the defense of our people,” and said, “But we must never forget this is not a war of choice, this is a war of necessity. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al-Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans.”

Let’s review the history of the US invasion of Afghanistan before we analyze the US claim that this is a defensive war. After the attacks of 9/11, the US government requested the cooperation of the Afghanistan Taliban government for extradition of Osama bid Laden to be charged with the 9/11 attacks. The Taliban ruling government agreed, as per usual cooperative international law, as soon as the US government provided evidence of bin Laden’s involvement. The US government refused to provide any evidence. The Taliban ruling government refused to allow US troops to enter their country and extradite bin Laden until evidence was provided, and made their argument to the world press for the rule of law to apply to the US extradition request. The US invaded Afghanistan without providing evidence and without UN Security Council approval. President Bush stated, “There’s no need to discuss evidence of innocence or guilt. We know he’s guilty.” Nine years later, despite promises to do so, the U.S. has not provided any evidence that bin Laden was involved in the 9/11 attacks. Indeed, the FBI does not seek bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks, stating “there is no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”

Some of you might have heard of a bin Laden “confession video.” The Pentagon’s “official translation” seems to indicate foreknowledge of the attacks, but independent translations show that the “official” version is a manipulation and an accurate translation shows no evidence of involvement. Apparently, the FBI is in agreement with the independent translations as they do not seek him for the crime. Indeed, Princeton professor of International Law Richard Falk articulates doubts concerning many aspects of the government’s explanation of 9/11. This view of a counter-government explanation is now shared by over 1,500 reputable scholars and professionals with academic training and professional experience that qualify them as experts in their testimonies.

The US invaded Afghanistan. The US provided no evidence to the Taliban Afghan government that bin Laden was involved in 9/11 and still have not done so. The US has provided no evidence that the Taliban supported the attacks of 9/11. The UN Security Council did not authorize use of force in Afghanistan. The US has provided no evidence of imminent threat to US national security from the Taliban. With no evidence of imminent threat or attack by Afghanistan, the US invasion is a War of Aggression. And yes, it’s just that simple.

Bush, Jr. went to the United National Security Council to get a resolution authorizing the use of military force against Afghanistan. He failed to get a resolution from the UN authorizing the use of military force against Afghanistan. This war has never been authorized by the United Nations Security Council. The first Security Council resolution refused to call what happened on September 11, 2001 an “armed attack” - that is by one state against another state. Rather they called it “terrorist attacks.” The critical point here is that this war has never been approved by the U.N. Security Council so technically it is illegal under international law. It constitutes an act and a war of aggression by the United States against Afghanistan.

Now in addition Bush, Jr. then went to Congress to get authorization to go to war. Bush, Jr. tried to get a formal declaration of war along the lines of December 8, 1941 after the Day of Infamy like FDR got on Pearl Harbor. He failed to get a declaration of war. Despite all the rhetoric we have heard by the Bush, Jr. administration Congress never declared war against Afghanistan or against anyone. There is technically no state of war today against anyone as a matter of constitutional law as formally declared.

Was the invasion of Afghanistan a legitimate act of self-defense by the United States after the 9/11 attacks? No, for several reasons. First, self-defense, in both international law and domestic law (in Canada, the Criminal Code), must be clearly distinguished from the use of force for revenge or punishment; states, like persons, must not act as vigilantes. Second, in criminal law, self-defense may be invoked in the face of an imminent threat of death or grave bodily harm. In general, the threat must be immediate and the response must not be pushed beyond what is reasonably required to repel that threat. Therefore, in general, self-defense may not be invoked to justify physical retaliation to an attack a few weeks after it occurs. The appropriate course of action in that case would involve police work, legal proceedings, and so forth.

Article 1 of Resolution 3314 of the UN General Assembly (1974) defines aggression: Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.

The resolution provides several concrete examples of acts that would be considered instances of aggression, including invasion, blockade, bombardment, or “[t]he sending [of armed groups] by or on behalf of a State” against another state.

In the case of the 9/11 attacks, the concepts of self-defense and aggression simply do not apply. Afghanistan could not be considered an aggressor state since the attacks were neither perpetrated by it or its agents nor planned on its territory. As well, in early October 2001 when it launched its war on Afghanistan, the United States was not, to anyone’s knowledge, facing an imminent threat of new attacks.

In both international and domestic law, self-defense certainly cannot be invoked to justify a later attack on a person or country who is merely presumed or claimed to be an aggressor. The US aggression against Afghanistan in October 2001 more closely resembles the new doctrine of “preventive war” which the White House subsequently made official in its National Security Strategy of September 2002. With this doctrine, the US claims the right to attack unilaterally, “preventively,” any country perceived as a serious threat to its vital interests or those of its allies. This doctrine was used as a cover for the invasion of Iraq and will likely serve the same purpose in any future aggression against Iran, Syria, or other countries. Under international law, such acts and “strategy” are totally illegal and illegitimate. Quite interesting that “preemptive attack” doctrine was rejected by the Nuremberg Tribunal when the lawyers for the Nazi defendants made it at Nuremberg. They rejected any doctrine of preemptive attack. When Bush failed to get any formal authorization from the Security Council, the U.S. Ambassador Negroponte sent a letter to the Security Council asserting Article 51 of the U.N. Charter to justify the war against Afghanistan. Basically saying that we reserve the right to use force in self-defense against any state we say is somehow involved in the events of September 11. Again George W Bush failed to get any formal authorization to use force against Afghanistan because of a legal precedent that goes back to the Nuremberg Judgment of 1946 where the lawyers for the Nazi defendants argued that we, the Nazi government had a right to go to war in self-defense as we saw it, and no one could tell us any differently. That argument was rejected by Nuremberg. In 2001 the highest level of officials of the US government made the same legal arguments that were rejected by the Nuremberg Tribunal.

Was the Afghanistan war authorized by the United Nations?

The war in Afghanistan was devised and directed by the United States. It was led by a coalition of countries, mainly NATO members (including Canada), who on 4 October 2001 invoked Article 5 of the North Atlantic (Washington) Treaty. Under this provision, an armed attack against any NATO country is considered an attack against them all. However, the UN declared the 9/11 attack as a “terrorist attack” not an “armed attack”. Even to this day the US government regards the attacks of September 11, 2001 as a “terrorist attack”. The US Congress did not recognize or declare the attacks as an “armed attack” which legally means that the US could not invoke Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.

There is no UN Security Council resolution authorizing the United States, whether alone or in coalition with other countries, to attack Afghanistan. Between 11 September and 7 October 2001, when the bombardment of Afghanistan began, the UN Security Council adopted only two resolutions, both concerning the 9–11 attacks. Resolution 1368 of September 12 “unequivocally condemns in the strongest terms the horrifying terrorist attacks… and regards such acts, like any act of international terrorism, as a threat to international peace and security.” The preamble to this resolution recognizes “the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense in accordance with the Charter. The terms of the Charter do not apply to the Afghan war. The language in the preamble of the resolution allowed the United States government to claim legitimacy for its actions despite none ever being implied or authorized by the United Nations. Then, on 28 September 2001, the Security Council adopted Resolution 1373, which sets forth certain anti-terrorism measures that all states must apply. Neither Resolution 1368 nor Resolution 1373 even mentions the word “Afghanistan.

But your iniquities have separated you from your God; and your sins have hidden His face from you, so that He will not hear. For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue has muttered perversity. No one calls for justice, nor does any plead for truth. They trust in empty words and speak lies; they conceive evil and bring forth iniquity. They hatch vipers’ eggs and weave the spider’s web; he who eats of their eggs dies, and from that which is crushed a viper breaks out. Their webs will not become garments, nor will they cover themselves with their works; their works are works of iniquity, and the act of violence is in their hands. Their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed innocent blood; their thoughts are thoughts of iniquity; wasting and destruction are in their paths. The way of peace they have not known, and there is no justice in their ways; they have made themselves crooked paths; whoever takes that way shall not know peace” (Isaiah 59:2-8).

I Support Peace. I support the immediate end to the illegal war and occupation of Afghanistan. I support the laying of charges of; war crimes, war of aggression, crimes against peace and murder against the leadership of the United States, Canada and NATO.

What’s so funny? The US people haven’t yet figured it out that they’ve been had - they’ve been robbed by the privately owned US Federal Reserve Banks and their co-conspirators, the US government.

Many in the US think that the US Federal Reserve is a Federally owned and controlled banking system. That is fiction. The US Federal Reserve is a privately owned bank with shareholders and banks around the World. The Federal Reserve System (also known as the Federal Reserve, and informally as the Fed) is the central banking system of the United States. It was created in 1913 by the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act, largely as a response to a series of orchestrated financial panics or bank runs, particularly a severe panic in 1907. Today the Federal Reserve is behind the US economic crisis, a repeat of 1907 whereby the shareholders of the modern Federal Reserve have orchestrated another financial panic. An audit of the Federal Reserve would reveal that the banks (will list them below) conspired to defraud the United States people of $trillions. An audit would reveal that there was no actual $billion loses, only a falsely proclaimed loss. You see the books of a private company are not under federal scrutiny unless there is reason to believe that the company isn’t or hasn’t reported its true earning to the government so that the government can collect the proper amount of taxes. What an audit would reveal is that the Federal Reserve banks, domestic and foreign banks make up the US Federal Reserve, conspired to commit fraud by understating their earning and overstating their losses in order to get their hands on US taxpayers dollars that have now exceeded $6 trillion. You see the bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks have done this before - in 1907.

The Panic of 1907, also known as the 1907 Bankers’ Panic, was a financial crisis that occurred in the United States when the New York Stock Exchange fell close to 50% from its peak the previous year. Panic occurred, as this was during a time of economic recession, and there were numerous runs on banks and trust companies. The 1907 panic eventually spread throughout the nation when many state and local banks and businesses entered into bankruptcy. Primary causes of the run include a retraction of market liquidity by a number of New York City banks and a loss of confidence among depositors. This is the exact same cause for the current US economic crisis.

Bank of America started today’s crisis by retracting market liquidity in the mortgage sector. Soon after other Federal Reserve banks did the same to exasperate the illusion of a financial crisis. The illusion of bank failures and bankruptcy achieved the Federal Reserve bank’s goal – to have Bush and Obama simply hand over $trillions in federal tax dollars. In both Bush’s Bailout Scheme and Obama’s Stimulus Scheme none of the banks of the Federal Reserve that received $trillions have to repay any of it back. Bush and Obama simply gave it all away with no strings attached. No repayment is required. No accounting of where the money is going is required. No paper trail. Bush and Obama even gave them all a get out of jail free card by declaring that their bailout and stimulus schemes will not be subjected to Judicial or Congressional oversight. Both Bush and Obama made sure this was part of the deal because both received multi $billion kickbacks for their unlawful defrauding of the US people scheme.

The 1907 panic began with a stock manipulation scheme to corner the market in F. Augustus Heinze’s United Copper Company. Heinze had made a fortune as a copper magnate in Butte, Montana. In 1906 he moved to New York City, where he formed a close relationship with notorious Wall Street banker Charles W. Morse. Morse had once successfully cornered New York City’s ice market, and together with Heinze gained control of many banks—the pair served on at least six national banks, ten state banks, five trust companies and four insurance firms.

Augustus’s brother, Otto, devised the scheme to corner United Copper, believing that the Heinze family already controlled a majority of the company. A significant number of the Heinzes’ shares had been borrowed, and Otto believed that many of these had been loaned to investors who hoped the stock price would drop, and that they could thus repurchase the borrowed shares cheaply, pocketing the difference—a technique known as short selling. Otto proposed a short squeeze, whereby the Heinzes would aggressively purchase as many remaining shares as possible, and then force the short sellers to pay for their borrowed shares. The aggressive purchasing would drive up the share price, and, being unable to find shares elsewhere, the short sellers would have no option but to turn to the Heinzes, who could then name their price.

Bush and Obama’s bailout recipients. Most of which were in the “derivatives mess”.

BNP Paribas Securities Corp.
Banc of America Securities LLC
Barclays Capital Inc.
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
Daiwa Securities America Inc.
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.
Jefferies & Company, Inc.
J. P. Morgan Securities Inc.
Lehman Bros.
Mizuho Securities USA Inc.
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
Nomura Securities International, Inc.
RBC Capital Markets Corporation
RBS Securities Inc.
UBS Securities LLC.

Now compare this list to the list of banks that make up the US Federal Reserve. The US Federal Reserve banks are the majority receivers of Bush and Obama’s tax dollar give away scheme.

US Federal Reserve Banks

* Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC - headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland. Formerly known as Schweizerische Kreditanstalt with links to Nazi Third Reich. In 1940 opened its first branch outside Switzerland (in New York). Involved in “laddering” stocks. This means selling a buyer a set number of stocks before they go public on the condition that they buy an equal amount once they do go public. This benefits the buyer because they get a good deal on the pre-market stocks and the guaranteed sale temporarily inflates the stock price for the securities firm. Accused of “spinning” stocks, or giving certain privileged clients (usually executives of top investment banking clients) access to new stock before they hit the market. The client can sell them for a large return in the first busy day or two of trading. In exchange, Credit Suisse Securities gets their investment banking business and heavy transaction fees.

* Daiwa Securities America Inc. - in 1998 was sanctioned for violating anti-fraud and compensation disclosure rules. NASD Regulation began its investigation of Daiwa in July 1996, shortly after receiving an internal Daiwa memorandum outlining an overcharging scheme. NASD Regulation found that, from July 1987 to December 1991, Daiwa’s Los Angeles branch office told customers that their buy orders had been executed at a price higher than the actual purchase price, and their sell orders had been executed at a price lower than the actual sale price. The firm kept the undisclosed difference as “secret profits.” NASD Regulation found that the Los Angeles branch office – which closed in August 1995 – reported either higher or lower executions in approximately 265 out of 570 transactions, resulting in $306,000 in illicit profits

* Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. - used the aggressive expansion of the German Reich into Austria and the Czech lands in order to acquire new branches in those areas and holdings in banks already operating there. Knowingly purchased gold taken from the victims of Nazi concentration camps. By the time the war ended, almost all account assets and deposits held by Jewish customers had been transferred to the German Reich.

* Lehman Brothers Inc. forced into bankruptcy to start the Federal Reserve banking panic scheme.

* Dresdner Kleinwort Securities LLC. - They and Deutsche Bank AG did a lot of business with the Third Reich. Both bought 4,446 kilograms of gold from the Reichsbank, the central bank of Nazi Germany. The gold was worth just over $5 million at the time. Of those purchases, the bank acquired at least 744 kilograms of “Melmer gold,” taken from concentration camp victims and later recast into bullion bars under the direction of the SS officer Bruno Melmer.

* Goldman, Sachs & Co. - Goldman Sachs was founded in 1869 by German Jewish immigrant Marcus Goldman. In 1882, Goldman’s son-in-law Samuel Sachs joined the firm which prompted the name change to Goldman Sachs. On December 4, 1928, it launched the Goldman Sachs Trading Corp. a closed-end fund with characteristics similar to that of a Ponzi scheme. The fund helped bring about the Stock Market Crash of 1929. Today we have history repeating as they created TARP - The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) is a program of the United States government to purchase assets and equity from financial institutions to strengthen its financial sector. It is the largest component of the government’s measures in 2008 to address the subprime mortgage crisis. The fund was set up by former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (former CEO of Goldman Sachs) which economists believe was pushing the US towards another Stock Market Crash of 2009.

* Greenwich Capital Markets Inc. - Effective April 1, 2009, Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., was renamed “RBS Securities Inc.”

* HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. - the U.S. home- lending unit for Europe’s biggest bank, went to trial on claims that a corporate predecessor hid predatory lending from shareholders. Plaintiffs claim the suit may be worth $1 billion. Paid a record $484 million fine in October 2002 to settle a dozen states’ claims it deceived borrowers about the terms of their mortgages. The company charged some clients double their promised interest by adding insurance and other costs, according to Michigan Attorney General Jennifer Granholm, who is now governor. “The company estimated that it had overcharged customers approximately $3.2 billion” and inflated its reported profits between 1999 and 2001, Dowd, the plaintiffs’ attorney, said in a pretrial court filing. HSBC Holdings’ profit fell last year to $5.7 billion from $19.1 billion because of claimed subprime losses.

* J. P. Morgan Securities Inc. - hostile takeover of Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. J.P. Morgan created and controlled Mahonia Ltd., an energy trading business. A venture company created in December of 1992, Mahonia operated out of the Channel Islands in the UK. Sixty percent of its transactions were made with Enron. These transactions were originally made by Enron in an attempt to defer taxes, but as the company’s debt increased, and the energy industry continued to experience losses, the transactions became a means to finance its operations. As the operator of Mahonia, J.P. Morgan faced major losses when Enron declared bankruptcy. The firm sought $1.1 billion from Enron’s insurers to cover losses it suffered through the pre-paid energy trades. Enron’s insurance companies, however, argued that they shouldn’t have to pay. Their argument centered on the assertion that the ‘trades’ that they had insured had turned out to be “disguised loans.” Their commitment to provide “absolute and unconditional” coverage, they stressed, did not apply toward covering “fraud.” They held that J.P. Morgan had conspired with Enron to hide the company’s debt by giving it loans masked as pre-paid energy trades with Mahonia. Their allegations raise questions as to why J.P. Morgan would have helped Enron hide its debt, and how supporting Enron could have benefited J.P. Morgan.

* Mizuho Securities USA Inc.

* Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated - conflicts of interest regarding a number of different companies. Morgan Stanley stock fraud actions involved client companies such as Gucci, and investigators claim that Morgan Stanley stock fraud were specifically designed to influence investment banking business with specific clients. Additionally, Morgan Stanley stock fraud is suspected in association with overvalued telecom stocks, and also in conjunction with Enron. Morgan Stanley stock fraud accusations have led to federal investigations related to failure to follow SEC required records-keeping. Morgan Stanley stock fraud plans were allegedly designed to benefit those companies who did business with the investment bank; Morgan Stanley stock fraud schemes were designed to deceive the investors, according to the investigators, who claim that Morgan Stanley stock frauds created false values, driving stock prices up or down according to their relationship with each company. The FBI has announced that former key executive for Morgan Stanley, Darin Demizio, will serve 38 months imprisonment and three years of supervised release for conspiring to commit securities fraud and wire fraud. Mr. Demizio routinely directed business from Morgan Stanley’s securities lending division to smaller brokerage firms for kickbacks that were paid to his father and Craig DeMizio, his brother. The amount of the kickbacks was over $1.6 million from 2000 – 2004.

* Nomura Securities International, Inc. - accused of conducting securities transactions through an agent whose record-keeping practices led to an erroneous transfer of funds attributable to dividend payments. Further, the Statement of Claim filed against petitioner alleged that petitioner violated “industry practice” by failing to return or to cause the return of these dividend payments.

* UBS Securities LLC. also linked to the Nazi Third Reich. In July 2008 the attorney general of New York accused UBS of consumer and securities fraud, saying the bank had misled investors when it sold them auction-rate securities. Auction-rate securities are preferred shares or debt instruments with rates that reset regularly, usually every week, in auctions overseen by the brokerage firms that originally sold them. But the $300 billion market for these instruments collapsed in February, trapping investors who had been told that they were safe and easy to cash in.Even as a senior executive at UBS called the market “a complete loser,” the bank continued to pitch the securities as short-term, liquid investments, according to the civil complaint filed by Andrew M. Cuomo, attorney general of New York.At the same time, seven executives at the bank sold their personal holdings of the securities, which totaled $21 million, to avoid losses, according to the complaint. “Once they knew the auctions were failing, they removed their personal money and corporate money from the auctions and were still bringing consumers into the auctions,” Mr. Cuomo said.

In 1907 a group of bankers conspired to create a fictional banking crisis in order to coerce the US Congress into forming the US Federal Reserve - a banking system of private bankers with complete control over the US. If you control a country’s money you control the country. Today the same group has orchestrated another banking crisis in order to form the World Monetary Fund - a banking system of private bankers with complete financial control over the World. How do we stop them? We shut them down. We invest in other banks or form completely new banks. We take our money out of their banks and put them in other locally owned banks. Most importantly have no part in the World Monetary Fund because if you do you no longer have a sovereign state.

“They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; the rich and predatory money lenders. This is an era of economic misery and for the reasons that caused that misery, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks are fully liable.” ~ Rep. Louis T. McFadden (R. Pa.) statement in regards to the Federal Reserve banks

How can the US taxpayers stop financing those whose purpose it is to destroy the United States?

To avert another financial crisis in the United States “ the Federal Reserve Act must be repealed and the Federal Reserve banks, having violated their charters, should be liquidated immediately.

Replace the counterfeit FED money (interest attached) for real U.S. money (interest-free) dollar for dollar, as Kennedy tried to do. The US people should not be required to pay interest on their own currency. According to Benjamin Franklin, this was one of the primary reasons “the people” fought the Revolutionary War. Today they are still fighting the same family of foreign bankers.

The U.S. Government can buy back the FED at any time for $450 million (per Congressional record). The U.S. Treasury could then collect all the profit on US money instead of the 300 original shareholders of the FED. The $13+ trillion of U.S. debt could be converted dollar for dollar with U.S. non-interest bearing currency when the debt becomes due. There would be no inflation because there would be no additional currency in circulation. Personal income tax could be cut if the US government got rid of the FED and therefore, the economy would expand. According to the Constitution, only Congress is to control the creation of money, keeping the amount of inflation or deflation in check. If Congress isn’t doing their job, they should be voted out of office. Unfortunately, voters can’t vote the unelected FED or its Chairman out of office.

If the government has a deficit, the United States government could handle it as Lincoln and Kennedy did. By printing interest-free United States Notes instead of the illegal interest-bearing counterfeit called the Federal Reserve Note.. Today the FED, through foreign banks, owns much of the US debt and therefore controls the United States. The FED will cease to exist as taxpayers become informed and tell other taxpayers.

By law (check the Congressional record), the US people can takeover the FED for the original investment of the FED’s 300 shareholders, which is $450 million. If each taxpayer paid $25, they could takeover the FED and all the profit would flow into the U.S. Treasury. In other words, by Congress allowing the constitutionally illegal FED to continue, much of your taxes go to the shareholders of the FED and their foreign bankers.

Note: The people who illegally enacted the FED also illegally created the IRS, within months of the FED’s inception. The FED buys U.S. debt with counterfeit money they print from nothing (meaning they have no value - worthless), then charges the U.S. taxpayers interest. The government had to create a tax - income tax - to pay the interest expense to the FED’s foreign shareholders, but the income tax was never legally passed. The FED is illegal, per Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. Not one state legally ratified the 16th Amendment making income tax legal.

If the FED was eliminated and the US government uphold the Constitution, the US could balance the budget and cut personal income tax to almost nothing. In Congressional hearings on September 30, 1941, FED Chairman Eccles admitted that the FED creates new money from thin air (printing press), and loans it back to the US people at interest. On June 6, 1960, FED President Mr. Allen admitted essentially the same thing. If you or I did this we would be arrested for counterfeiting and put in jail.

It is time to abolish the Federal Reserve Bank’s control of the United States. It is time to stop the Federal Reserve Bankers from printing of the US money and creating the US debt! The US people don’t even need to buy back the FED. They only need to print money the way the United Constitution requires - by Congress, interest free.

NATO is a political movement seeking to revive Nazism. This neo-Nazi organization has organized representation in many countries, as well as international networks.

On March 24, 1999 the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) launched an illegal and unprovoked War of aggression against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. NATO did not have any authorization from the UN Security Council to carry out this aggression.

Not only did the aggression violate the UN Charter, but also many international covenants pertaining to the rules of war. NATO deliberately targeted civilians, not even hospitals were spared from NATO’s criminal attacks. In fact, NATO managed to destroy more hospitals than Yugoslav Army tanks.

On October 7, 2001 NATO launched another illegal and unprovoked War of aggression against the sovereign state of Afghanistan. Afghanistan did not attack any country, not on September 11, 2001, not prior to that date and not since that date. Afghanistan was a poor defenseless state that was and continues to be a victim of war crimes committed by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). These are the same crimes that their leaders committed in World War II. NATO is the army that was created by Nazi war criminals. Their mission is the establishment of the Fourth Reich. They have and continue to commit crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and war crimes with the help of US, Canadian, Russian, English, French and other former Nazi occupied countries to build a new Nazi controlled empire.

In terms of neo-Nazism, the Fourth Reich is envisioned as featuring Aryan supremacy, anti-Semitism, Lebensraum, aggressive militarism and totalitarianism. Subsequently, neo-Nazis believe that this rise would pave the way for the establishment of the Western Imperium, a pan-Aryan world empire encompassing lands with prominent European descended peoples (Europe, Russia, Anglo-America, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Southern South America, and other significantly white countries in Latin America). The Fourth Reich began with formation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The wars of the Fourth Reich began immediately after the reunification of Germany.

In his book, The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America, Jim Marrs argues that some surviving members of Germany’s Third Reich, along with sympathizers in the United States and elsewhere, given safe haven by organizations like ODESSA and Die Spinne, have been working behind the scenes since the end of World War II to enact at least some of the principles of Nazism (e.g. militarism, fascism, conquest, widespread spying on citizens, use of corporations and propaganda to control national interests and ideas) into culture, government, and business worldwide. He cites the influence of Nazis brought into the United States at the end of World War II, such as Nazi scientists brought in under Operation Paperclip to help advance aerospace in the US, and the acquisition and creation of conglomerates by Nazis and their sympathizers after the war, in both Europe and the US - the largest of which is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

America became the soldiers of the Nazi Fourth Reich on September 11, 2001.

When the World Trade Towers collapsed, most Americans simply refused to believe suggestions that the attacks had been staged by parties working for the US Government itself. Americans were afraid to, even as news reports surfaced proving that the US Government had announced plans for the invasion of Afghanistan months before the attacks on September 11, 2001 even took place. The United States government made plans and announced their intention to the World early in the year, plans into which the attacks on the World Trade Towers which angered the American people into support of the already-planned war fit entirely too conveniently.

So trapped are Americans by their belief in their own bravery that they will themselves to be blind to the evidence before their eyes, so that they can nod in agreement with the government while still imagining themselves to have courage, even as they avoid the one situation which most requires real courage; to stand up to the government’s lies and deceptions. The vast majority of the American people, their own self-image dependent on continuing blindness to the government’s deceptions, never question why Afghanistan would have done something so stupid as to attack the United States, and as a result, Americans find themselves in a war. Even after being presented with the facts that no Afghan citizen, political official or military personnel took part in either the planning of the attacks on September 11, 2001 or the execution of the attacks. The United States government even published the names and nationalities of the hijackers and mastermind of the attack. The majority were Saudi nationals. bin Laden is also a Saudi national.

Even with all the evidence exonerating (to free from blame) Afghanistan of any crime against the United States the US government granted themselves temporary extraordinary powers, powers specifically banned under Constitutional law, but powers the government claimed they need to have to deal with the “terrorists”. The American people, too stupid to see that they have been grossly deceived by their government have agreed with their government’s lies and contradictions. Because Americans are too stupid and gullible those temporary illegal powers are now no more temporary in America than they were in Germany when Nazi ideologist, Adolf Hitler burned down the Reichstag building (the parliament building of the German Empire) and blamed it on “terrorists” they called communists. The destruction of the building gave Hitler the excuse for the Nazis to suspend most rights provided for by Germany’s 1919 constitution in an effort by Hitler to increase state security throughout Germany. 68 years later and history was repeated when the United States government attacked the United States on September 11, 2001 and in order to grant themselves illegal extraordinary powers that illegally suspended the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights (an illegal suspension that continues to this day) and they blamed the attacks on “terrorists” they called Al Qaeda.

The US Government knows they rule a nation of cowards. The government has had to spend the money to make the new war something cowards can fight. The government has decorated the troops with regalia to make them proud of themselves, further trapping them in their self-image.

Finally, knowing that it takes courage to kill the enemy face to face, the United States government has spent vast sums of money on wonder weapons, airplanes, submarines, ultra-long range artillery, cruise missiles, and guided missiles, weapons that kill at a distance, so that those doing the killing need not have to face the reality of what they are doing.

Hitler was TIME Magazine’s Man Of The Year in 1938. Stalin was TIME Magazine’s Man Of The Year for 1939 and 1942. Both of these men, and many others also celebrated by the media, were unimaginable monsters. The lesson from these facts is that it isn’t easy to spot a genocidal tyrant when you live with one, especially one whom the press supports and promotes.

Tyrants become obvious only when looking back, after what they have done becomes known. The German people did not stand up to Hitler because their media betrayed them, just as the American media is betraying the American people by willingly, voluntarily, even proudly, abandoning its traditional role as watchdog against government abuse.

It is the very nature of power that it attracts the sort of people who should not have it. The United States, as the world’s last superpower, is a prize that attracts men and women willing to do absolutely anything to win that power, and hence are also willing to do absolutely anything with that power once they have it. If one thinks about it long enough, one will realize that all tyrants, past and most especially present, MUST use deception on their population to initiate a war.

No citizen of a modern industrialized nation will send their children off to die in a war to grab another nation’s resources and assets, yet resources and assets are what all wars are fought over. The nation that wishes to initiate a war of conquest must create the illusion of an attack or a threat to start a war, and must always give their population of cowards an excuse never to question that carefully crafted illusion.
It is naive, not to mention racist to assume that tyrants appear only in other nations and that somehow America is immune simply because we’re Americans. America has escaped the clutches of a dictatorship thus far only through the efforts of those citizens who, unlike the Germans of the 1930s, have the moral courage to stand up and point out where the government is lying to the people.

Unless more Americans are willing to have that kind of individual courage, then future generations may well look back on the American people with the same harshness of judgement with which we look back on the 1930s Germans.

As a primary source of international law, the judgment of the Nuremberg Tribunal in the 1945-1946 case of the major Nazi war criminals is plain and clear. Our leaders often invoke and praise that judgment, but obviously have not read it. The International Court declared:

To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime, it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

At Nuremberg, the United States and Britain pressed the prosecution of Nazi leaders for planning and initiating aggressive war. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, the head of the American prosecution staff, asserted “that launching a war of aggression is a crime and that no political or economic situation can justify it.” He also declared that “if certain acts in violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.”

The United Nations Charter views aggression similarly. Articles 2(4) and (7) prohibit interventions in the domestic jurisdiction of any country and threats of force or the use of force by one state against another. The General Assembly of the UN in Resolution 2131, “Declaration on the Inadmissibility of Intervention,” reinforced the view that a forceful military intervention in any country is aggression and a crime without justification.

Putting a “NATO” label on aggressive policy and conduct does not give that conduct any sanctity. This is simply a perversion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, supposedly formed as a defensive alliance under the UN Charter. The North Atlantic Treaty pledged its signatories to refrain from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations, and it explicitly recognized “the primary responsibility of the Security Council (of the United Nations) for the maintenance of international peace and security.” Obviously, in bypassing UN approval for attacking and occupying the former Yugoslavia and now Afghanistan, the U.S. and NATO have violated this basic obligation.

From another standpoint of international law, the current conduct of military aggressive armed attacks by the United States and NATO constitutes a continuing war crime. Contrary to the beliefs of our war planners, unrestricted air bombing is barred under international law. Bombing the “infrastructure” of a country’s waterworks, electricity plants, bridges, factories, television and radio locations are not attacks limited to legitimate military objectives. US and NATO attacks has also caused an excessive loss of life and injury to civilians, which violates another standard. We have now killed hundreds, if not thousands, of innocent and defenseless civilians.


Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 - A report written in 1996 (under the Clinton Administration) for the United States Air Force states: “In 2025, US aerospace forces can “own the weather” by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.

A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather-modification system could provide to a war-fighting commander in chief (CINC) are listed in table 1.

Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather-modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.

Table 1 - Operational Capabilities Matrix
Precipitation Enhancement Precipitation Avoidance
- Flood Lines of Communication - Maintain/Improve LOC
- Reduce PGM/Recce Effectiveness - Maintain Visibility
- Decrease Comfort Level/Morale - Maintain Comfort Level/Morale
Storm Enhancement Storm Modification
- Deny Operations - Choose Battlespace Environment
Precipitation Denial Space Weather
- Deny Fresh Water - Improve Communication Reliability
-- Induce Drought - Intercept Enemy Transmissions
Space Weather - Revitalize Space Assets
- Disrupt Communications/Radar Fog and Cloud Generation
- Disable/Destroy Space Assets - Increase Concealment
Fog and Cloud Removal Fog and Cloud Removal
- Deny Concealment - Maintain Airfield Operations
- Increase Vulnerability to PGM/Recce - Enhance PGM Effectiveness
Detect Hostile Weather Activities Defend against Enemy Capabilities

Current technologies that will mature over the next 30 years will offer anyone who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather patterns and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability.

In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. These levels could include unilateral actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership in an international organization such as the UN, or participation in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes weather-modification, its use in our national military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue weather-modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries.

In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather-modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance air and space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness. “The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;” in 2025 we can “Own the Weather.”

A Research Paper presented to Air Force by Col Tamzy J. House, Lt Col James B. Near, Jr., LTC William B. Shields (USA), Maj Ronald J. Celentano, Maj David M. Husband, Maj Ann E. Mercer, and Maj James E. Pugh in August 1996.

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 - is a study to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense.

Today, not in 2025, the United States has the technology to “Own the Weather”, and they are now actively using it. The technology is called HAARP - High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. Their website states only their official version of what HAARP is doing but US military documents and HAARP’s own data reveals HAARP’s real purpose - environmental warfare - manipulating global weather for US geopolitical gain.

The Nazi SS identifying symbol can clearly be seen embedded in the NATO logo. The Nazi Swastika is made by the superimposed SS and can also be clearly seen within the NATO logo.

The Schutzstaffel (Protection Squadron), abbreviated SS—or Runic “↯↯” — was a major paramilitary organization formed in 1925 as a personal protection guard unit for Adolf Hitler. After the Nazi seizure of power, the mission of the SS expanded from the protection of the person of Adolf Hitler to the internal security of the Nazi regime. Built upon the Nazi ideology, the SS, under Heinrich Himmler’s command, grew from a small paramilitary formation to one of the largest and most powerful organizations in the Third Reich - a huge force of thirty-eight combat divisions comprising over 950,000 men.

The Waffen-SS (”Armed Protective Squadron”) was the combat arm of the Schutzstaffel (SS). Commanded by Heinrich Himmler who was ranked Reichsführer-SS (National Leader of the SS), the Waffen-SS fought and killed Allied forces throughout the Second World War.

The original cadre of the Waffen-SS came from the Freikorps and the Reichswehr along with various right-wing paramilitary formations. Formed at the instigation of Heinrich Himmler, the Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler (LSSAH) was the first formation of what was to become the Waffen-SS. When the SA (Sturmabteilung - Storm Troops)was rendered powerless in the Night of the Long Knives, many ex-SA men requested transfer to the SS, swelling its ranks and resulting in the formation of several new units including the SS-Verfügungstruppe (to become the SS Division Das Reich) and the SS-Totenkopfverbände (to become the SS Division Totenkopf and also the concentration camp guard unit).

According to the Nuremberg Trials, as well as countless war crimes investigations and trials conducted over the past sixty years, the SS was responsible for the vast majority of war crimes perpetrated under the Nazi regime, including most notoriously at Oradour-sur-Glane, Marzabotto and in the Malmedy massacre. Chosen to implement the Nazi “Final Solution” for the Jews and other groups deemed inferior (and/or enemies of the state), the SS was the lead branch in carrying out the killing, torture and enslavement of approximately twelve million people. Most victims were Jews or of Polish or other Slavic extraction. However, other racial/ethnic groups such as the Rroma made up a significant number of victims, as well. Furthermore, the SS purge was extended to those viewed as threats to “race hygiene” or Nazi ideology—including the mentally or physically handicapped, homosexuals, or political dissidents. Members of labor organizations and those perceived to be affiliated with groups (religious, political, social and otherwise) that opposed the regime, or were seen to have views contradictory to the goals of the Nazi government, were rounded up in large numbers; these included clergy of all faiths, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Freemasons, Communists, and Rotary Club members.

Himmler begins forming a SS military force of foreign volunteers and conscripts

As WWII escalated Himmler, wanted to expand the Waffen-SS and advocated the idea of SS controlled foreign legions (NATO is that SS controlled foreign legion). The Reichsführer, with his penchant for medieval lore, envisioned a united european ‘crusade’, fighting to save old Europe from the ‘Godless bolshevik hordes’ (the communist Soviet Union). While volunteers from regions which had been declared Aryan were approved almost instantly, Himmler eagerly pressed for the creation of more and more foreign units.

In late 1940, the creation of a multinational SS division, the Wiking, was authorized. Command of the division was given to SS-Brigadeführer Felix Steiner. Steiner immersed himself in the organization of the volunteer division, soon becoming a strong advocate for an increased number of foreign units. The Wiking was committed to combat several days after the launch of Operation Barbarossa, proving itself an impressive fighting unit.

Soon, Danish, Flemish, Norwegian and Dutch freiwilligen (volunteer) formations were committed to combat, gradually proving their worth. As the success of his experiment became apparent, the Reichsführer began to look for recruits from further afeild, planning the formation of legions from ethnic groups viewed as inferior to the Nordic races of Northern Europe.

Hitler however, was hesitant to allow foreign volunteers to be formed into formations based on their ethnicity, preferring that they be absorbed into multi-national divisions. Hitler feared that unless the foreign recruits were committed to the Nazi idea of a united Germania, then their reasons for fighting were suspect, and could damage the Nazi German cause. Despite Hitler’s fear and initial opposition Himmler was allowed to create his new formations, but they were to be commanded by German officers and NCOs. Himmler’s goal was to acquire additional combat manpower from occupied nations. Beginning in 1942-43, several new formations were formed from Latvians, Estonians, Ukrainians and even Bosnians. The Reichsführer had sidestepped the race laws by ordering that Waffen-SS units formed with men from non-Aryan backgrounds were to be designated division der SS (or Division of the SS) rather than SS Division. The wearing of the SS runes on the collar was forbidden, with several of these formations wearing a national insignia instead.

All non-Germanic officers and men in these units had their rank prefix changed from SS to Waffen (e.g. a Latvian Hauptscharführer would be referred to as a Waffen-Hauptscharführer rather than SS-Hauptscharführer). An example of a division der SS is the Estonian Waffen-Grenadier-Division der SS (estnische Nr.1). The combat ability of the divisions der SS varied greatly, with the Latvian, French and Estonian formations performing exceptionally and the Croatian and Albanian units performing poorly.

While many adventurers and idealists joined the SS as part of the fight against communism, many of the later recruits joined or were conscripted for different reasons. For example, Dutchmen who joined the SS-Freiwilligen-Grenadier-Division Landstorm Nederland were granted exemption from forced labour and provided with food, pay and accommodation. Recruits who joined for such reasons rarely proved good soldiers, and several units composed of such volunteers were involved in atrocities.

Towards the end of 1943, it became apparent that numbers of volunteer recruits were inadequate to meet the needs of the German military campaigns, so conscription was introduced. The Estonian Waffen-Grenadier-Division der SS (estnische Nr.1) is an example of such a conscript formation, which proved to be outstanding soldiers with an unblemished record.

Not satisfied with the growing number of volunteer formations, Himmler sought to gain control of all volunteer forces serving alongside Germany. This put the SS at odds with the Heer, as several volunteer units had been placed under Heer (German Regular Army) control (e.g. all Spanish volunteers of the Spanish Blue Division fell under Heer control). Despite this, Himmler constantly campaigned to have all foreign volunteers fall under the SS banner. In several cases, like the ROA and the SS-Freiwilligen-Sturmbrigade Wallonien he was successful, and by the last year of the war, most foreign volunteers units did fall under SS command.

While several volunteer units performed poorly in combat, the majority acquitted themselves well. French and Spanish SS volunteers, along with remnants of the SS-Freiwilligen-Panzergrenadier-Division Nordland formed the final defense of the Reichstag in 1945.

Multinational Waffen-SS war criminals form NATO

After the surrender of Germany, many multinational SS volunteers and conscripts were tried and imprisoned by their countries. In several cases, volunteers were executed as traitors. Multinational SS volunteers from the Baltic States and Ukraine were to be sent to Soviet penal labour camps. To avoid this, many ex-multinational SS from these regions joined underground resistance groups which were engaged fighting the Soviets until the 1950s. Many other Waffen-SS volunteers, including many Wiking veterans, avoided punishment by joining the French Foreign Legion. It is estimated that out of roughly 70,000 members of the SS involved in war crimes in German concentration camps, only between 1650 and 1700 were tried after the war. Many fled to Nazi sympathizer countries. Most, however, went on to form and control the new Nazi SS combat arm called NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization). The new multinational Waffen-SS organization called NATO was allowed to be formed with the full support the United States and England. Both the United States and England helped the multinational SS officers create NATO because of the communist threat from the Soviet Union.

The target of the post WWII Nazi multinational Waffen-SS forces (NATO), the United States and England is one and the same - the Soviet Union. Since the enemy is the same and the new combat force was created by and with former Nazi Waffen-SS officers and soldiers NATO is the continuation of the combat arm of the Nazi Schutzstaffel (SS) - the Waffen-SS. Remember that the Bolsheviks defeated Nazi Germany in WWII. The SS was disgraced for it could not fulfill its namesake - Protection Squadron as the Bolsheviks (Soviet Union) drove back the elite Nazi Waffen-SS all the way back to Berlin. Since the fall of Germany and the Nazi ideology of a united Europe the goal of the surviving members of the Waffen-SS has been to defeat the Bolsheviks - Russians.

Today the new multinational Waffen-SS army called NATO is massed along the Bolsheviks borders. They are quietly preparing for an all out war against the Bolsheviks. The first battle between the multinational Waffen-SS army called NATO and the Bolsheviks began on March 24, 1999 when NATO attacked and now occupies Yugoslavia. Then on October 7, 2001 the multinational Waffen-SS forces attacked and now occupies Afghanistan - which also borders modern Bolshevik (Russia). Both wars were wars of aggression and war crimes. Both committed by the new multinational Waffen-SS army called NATO.


On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. This Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.

When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110 gave back to the Treasury Department the explicit authority: “to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury.” This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury’s vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. The $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.

“United States Notes” were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a “Federal Reserve Note” issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a “United States Note” from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy’s Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says “Federal Reserve Note” on the top while the other says “United States Note”. Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.

President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper “currency” circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes - all illegal counterfeits.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The United States Notes was backed by silver and the Federal Reserve Notes was not backed by anything of intrinsic value - making the Federal Reserve Notes worthless, even today.

Executive Order 11110 would have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create worthless counterfeit “money”. Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and real value worth something.

Americans would not pay income tax and the middle class and low-middle class would see more of their hard earned money. Their standard of living could finally be with-out debt since all their income taxes do is pay off the national debt which is created be the government taking loans and paying interest to the illegal Federal Reserve Banking system. The Supreme law of the United States of America, the U.S. Constitution, Article 1 Section 8:

The Congress shall have Power … To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

The power to coin money and to regulate the value thereof was illegal taken away from Congress and given to the unelected private bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks. It is within the power of the United States Congress to take back that right and to punish the bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks for illegally counterfeiting the securities and lawful coin of the United States. Executive Order 11110 is still valid and as such the US Congress and the United States president is legally bound to carry out that order. The bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks are all crooks and they have been robbing the United States people. The largest robbery in the United States history was carried out by the bankers of the Federal Reserve Banks. They stole $trillions from the people of the United States in 2 elaborate fraudulent bailout schemes.

The bankers of the illegal Federal Reserve Banks need to be put out of the business of defrauding the United States people. They need to be arrested, charged and punished for their crimes against the United States and the people.


The United States government commits murder against its own people and against foreign nationals on a daily bases. The U.S. government claims that they are legally justified in killing any and all alleged terrorist suspect because they claim to be at war. There is a major problem with the U.S. government’s argument. In order for any country to be exempted from charges of murder a country must formally declare war. The United States has never declared war. The United States has never declared war against Iraq or Afghanistan. That means there is no state of war between the U.S. and Iraq or the U.S. and Afghanistan. That means every life taken by the U.S. and NATO forces is murder.

Murder, as defined in common law countries, is the unlawful killing of another human being with “malice aforethought”. As the loss of a human being inflicts enormous grief upon the individuals close to the victim, as well as the fact that the commission of a murder is highly detrimental to the good order within society, most societies both present and in antiquity have considered it a most serious crime worthy of the harshest of punishment. In the US, a person convicted of murder is typically given a life sentence or even the death penalty for such an act. A person who commits murder is called a murderer.

The elements of common law murder are:

1. the killing
2. of a human being
3. by another human being
4. with malice aforethought - with malice aforethought - originally “malice aforethought” carried its every day meaning - a deliberate and premeditated killing of another motivated by ill will. Murder necessarily required that an appreciable time pass between the formation and execution of the intent to kill. The courts broadened the scope of murder by eliminating the requirement of actual premeditation and deliberation as well as true malice. All that was required for malice aforethought to exist is that the perpetrator act with one of the four states of mind that constitutes “malice.”

The four states of mind recognized as constituting “malice” are:

1. Intent to kill,
2. Intent to inflict grievous bodily harm short of death,
3. Reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life, or
4. Intent to commit a dangerous felony (the “felony-murder” doctrine).

In Abrahamic religions, the prohibition against murder is one of the Ten Commandments given by God to Moses in (Exodus: 20:13) and (Deuteronomy 5:17).

Christian churches have some doctrinal differences about what forms of homicide are prohibited biblically, though all agree murder is.

In Islam according to the Qur’an, one of the greatest sins is to kill a human being who has committed no fault. “For that cause We decreed for the Children of Israel that whosoever killeth a human being for other than manslaughter or corruption in the earth, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind, and whoso saveth the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind.”

According to Blackstone, English common law identified murder as a public wrong. At common law, murder is considered to be malum in se, that is an act which is evil within itself. An act such as murder is wrong/evil by its very nature. And it is the very nature of the act which does not require any specific detailing or definition in the law to consider murder a crime.

Killing of enemy combatants by lawful combatants in accordance with lawful orders in war, although illicit killings within a war constitute murder or homicidal war crimes.

According to evidence collected by the United States intelligence service and the United States law enforcement agencies Iraq and Afghanistan committed no fault against the United States nor against any other country. Iraq and Afghanistan did not attack the United States or any other country, not on September 11, 2001, not prior to 9/11 and not any time after 9/11. The United States attacked Afghanistan and Iraq, not out of self-defense, but with malice aforethought. The United States did petition both the U.S. Congress and the United Nations for a declaration of war but both the U.S. Congress and the UN denied them the legal authority to go to war - a declaration of war was denied. Every life taken since the unprovoked attacks by the U.S. against Afghanistan and Iraq is, according to United States law and foreign state law, murder.

There is and never has been any legal authority given to the United States government to wage war against Afghanistan, Iraq or Pakistan and there is no legal defense for the United States killing of any person they alleged to be terrorists.

Democracy, civilized society, is only valid when the rule of law is adhered to by all. A leader of a democratic country who orders its people to attack and kill any person that has committed no fault is a criminal, a murderer. George W Bush is a mass murderer. Dick Cheney is a mass murderer. Donald Rumsfeld is a mass murderer. Tony Blair is a mass murderer. Barack Hussein Obama is a mass murderer. Robert Gates is a mass murderer. They are all government agents who have intentionally and indiscriminately murdered a large number of people. They have murdered under the false pretense of self-defense. They have murdered under the guise of a declaration of war, a declaration that has never been formally made.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the United States Constitution, sometimes referred to as the War Powers Clause, vests in the Congress the exclusive power to declare war, in the following wording:

Congress shall have Power… “To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;”

The United States government never received the Constitutionally required declaration of war from the U.S. Congress. Instead the United States government declared, without legal authority or right, that they were authorized to use force. Bush didn’t even initially seek Congressional approval to attack Iraq because he believed the authorization Congress provided his father in 1991 for Operation Desert Storm was still good. Bush waged war illegally and both Bush and Obama have committed mass murder.

The United States is no longer a Constitutional Republic. Since Jimmy Carter, the United States government has become nothing more than a gang of murdering thieves. The Supreme law of the United States, the United States Constitution, is no longer relevant on most matters of governing. Presidents, the Congress and the courts have made going to war, once a serious constitutional issue, a purely political question. As a result, in the last half century, the war powers clause of the Constitution has become a nullity, if not a quaint relic. While conservatives often insist on following the letter of the Constitution on most issues, on matters of war they totally ignore it.

That’s a disgrace, because the Framers of the Constitution carefully laid out the decision-making process for war. Pursuant to the document, war is a decision to be made exclusively by the elected representatives of the people - the Congress. Only Congress is authorized to declare war, raise and support armies, provide and maintain a navy, and make the rules for these armed forces. There is nothing vague or unclear about the language in Article I, Section 8, clauses 11-16. There is nothing vague or unclear about the language in U.S. Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 51 > § 1111

§ 1111. Murder

(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing; or committed in the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, escape, murder, kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage, aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse, child abuse, burglary, or robbery; or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or torture against a child or children; or perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree.

In occupied Afghanistan fields the United States’ heroin poppies grow.

Since the turn of the 20th century Canada was there to fight for the freedom of others. For decades the Canadian government sent our people abroad to fight to liberate any country that was being occupied by another aggressive state. For decades Canada sent its people abroad to defend our fellow man’s inalienable right to be free.

Throughout the entire 20th century Canadians were liberators. Canadians were peace keepers. Canadians freed the occupied, the oppressed and the abused. Canadians paid the ultimate sacrifice to liberate others, to bring about peace and to keep that peace. On October 7, 2001 that all ended. On October 7, 2001 the Canadian government conspired with and aided the United States government in an unprovoked war of aggression against a sovereign foreign state. Canada aided the United States government in an armed attack against a country that had nothing to do with the criminal hijacking of US commercial airlines on US soil on September 11, 2001. None of the hijackers were from Afghanistan. None of the planners of the hijacking and attacks were from Afghanistan. The majority of hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, including the accused mastermind - bin Laden.

Because of the criminal act of a war aggression by the Canadian government against one the poorest sovereign foreign states on Earth I will now forever remember that on that day, October 7, 2001, Canada became an aggressor, a destroyer, a butcher, a murderer, a torturer and a war monger. On that day I will remember that Canada sent our people abroad to overthrow by military force the government of a foreign sovereign state. On that day I will remember that Canada sent our people abroad to attack and kill the very poor, defenseless and innocent people of Afghanistan. On that day I will remember that Canada sent our people to Afghanistan to injure and kill women and children. On that day I will forever remember that Canada was no longer a nation of liberators and peace keepers.

Every November 11 prior to 2001 I use to proudly remember all those who paid the ultimate sacrifice so that others could be free. I use to respect the Canadian Armed Forces for the brave, noble, and selfless acts they had done to defend the freedom and sovereignty of Canada and other foreign states. Now every November 11 I will shamefully remember all those innocent people who had their freedom, their homes and their lives taken away by Canadians. Every November 11 I will bow my head in shame for I will remember that my fellow Canadians were sent abroad to attack, to destroy, to occupy, to torture and to kill thousands of poor, defenseless and innocent people.


A highly worrisome, antibiotic-resistant superbug seems to spreading slowly but steadily through Canada.

The Public Health Agency of Canada says eight cases of NDM-1 bacterial infection have now been confirmed, up from three as of late August.

At least five of the eight people had travelled to India or Pakistan, where NDM-1 superbug infections were first discovered and where they are becoming more widespread. Four of the patients spent time in hospital, while the fifth had “contact” with the health-care system.

Two of the infected patients have died, although not directly from NDM-1 bacteria. One was a 76-year-old B.C. woman who died of complications from sepsis, while the other patient, from Quebec, had cancer.

NDM-1 is a gene that renders bacterial infections immune to most, if not all, manufactured antibiotics. The gene, whose full name is New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1, makes the bacteria produce an enzyme that neutralizes the activity of pharmaceutical carbapenem antibiotics, which are the class of “last resort” pharmaceutical antibiotics (drugs) reserved for only the most severe infections.

The gene has been found in several types of bacteria, so far, primarily in bacteria that cause urinary tract infections and some types of pneumonia.

Bacteria carrying the gene were first discovered in hospitals in India and Pakistan. Cases have now been reported in the U.K., Australia, the Netherlands, the United States and Canada, generally among patients who had medical care in India or Pakistan.

Lancet Journal of Infectious Diseases has stated “The potential for wider international spread and for NDM-1 to become endemic worldwide, are clear and frightening.”

Writing in the medical journal Lancet Infectious Diseases, co-authors of the research, Prof Timothy Walsh from Cardiff University, and Prof David Livermore, from the Health Protection Agency report that there have been 37 cases in the UK and warn the bug has ‘alarming potential to spread and diversify’.

A new superbug NDM-1 which is resistant to almost every (manufactured) antibiotic is poised to spread and wreak havoc across the world unless new (manufactured) antibiotics are developed quickly warns the UK Health Protection Agency.

Here is some very good news for the UK Health Protection Agency, the Lancet Journal of Infectious Diseases and the Public Health Agency of Canada. The drug resistant NDM-1 superbug is easily destroyed by Vitamin C. What pharmaceutically (lab) created antibodies can’t do Vitamin C can. What very expensive drugs can’t do nature’s Vitamin C can.

Vitamin C is a key factor in the immune system, including white blood cell function and interferon levels. It combats the effects of free radicals and promotes growth and tissue repair.

Two-time Nobel prize winner, Dr. Linus Pauling was the first to realize vitamin C’s crucial importance in the maintenance of a healthy immune system. In 1970 he proposed that regular intake of vitamin-C in amounts far higher than the officially sanctioned RDA (Recommended Daily Allowance) could help prevent and shorten the duration of the common cold and even prevent them. Although the medical establishment immediately voiced their strong opposition to this idea, many ordinary people believed Dr. Pauling and began taking large amounts of vitamin-C. Most immediately noticed a great decrease in the frequency and severity of their colds

Dr. Pauling recommended vitamin C intakes of 1000 mg/day or more. The official RDA is 60 mg/day (100 mg/day for smokers). So who is right? How much do we need? To answer this question it is crucial to realize that the RDA is not, in anyway, based on what is required for optimum health. The RDA is simply the amount required to avoid scurvy, the most obvious deficiency disease. Actually the RDA is based on the vitamin C content of the average diet. The logic goes somewhat like this: “The average “healthy” North American diet provides about 60 mg/day of vitamin C, so since scurvy is virtually unknown in the USA today 60 mg/day must be adequate.” So much for science!

Many experts are now realizing that the RDA of 60 mg/day is far too low to provide for optimum health and protection against disease. A team of medical researchers at the National Institutes of Health in the USA recently completed a study designed to determine the vitamin C requirements of healthy, young men. They found that a minimum intake of 1000 mg/day was required to completely saturate the blood plasma with vitamin C. They also found that vitamin C should be taken in divided doses throughout the day as urinary excretion increases rapidly when individual doses exceed 500 mg. The researchers conclude that the RDA should be raised to 200 mg/day. This amount of vitamin C can be obtained from a diet containing five daily servings of fresh fruit and vegetables; unfortunately, less than 15 per cent of children and adults in the USA actually consume such a diet.

While 200 mg/day of vitamin C may be sufficient to maintain a reasonable health status in healthy, young men, it is clear that such a relatively low intake is far from adequate for older and sick people. It is also evident that far greater amounts are required to provide optimum protection against degenerative diseases such as cancer and heart disease.

It has long been accepted that a diet rich in vitamin C from fruits and vegetables provides protection against cancer and heart disease. Researchers from the National Institute on Aging report that elderly people who take vitamin C and E supplements have a 50 per cent lower risk of dying prematurely from disease than do people who do not supplement.

A Californian study concluded that people who consume more than 750 mg/day of vitamin C reduce their risk of dying prematurely by 60 per cent. Italian researchers have concluded that older people, especially the sick are exposed to a much higher level of oxidative stress than are younger people and that their low blood levels of vitamin C reflect this. Other research has found that people who suffer from asthma, arthritis, cancer, diabetes, and heart disease have much lower levels of vitamin C in their blood than do healthy people.

Taken in large enough doses, vitamin C revs up your immune system by pumping enough fuel into white blood cells to destroy invading viruses and bacteria.

Vitamin C increases interferon levels and has interferon-like properties itself. It acts as a natural antihistamine that helps dry up watery eyes and reduce nasal and chest congestion. It is also a powerful antioxidant that can help prevent the damage that your body endures when viruses or bacteria attack your immune system.

At the first sign of cold or flu symptoms, take vitamin C with bioflavonoids or rose hips four to six times a day, says Dr. Meletis. “The bioflavonoids and rose hips strengthen the vitamin C’s infection-fighting power by 35 percent,” he says.

German researchers have now demonstrated that a baseline amount of beta-interferon must be active in order for competent immune recognition and response to any viral invader, which of course includes the swine flu (H1N1), the Avian flu and the NDM-1 superbug. One of the many immune roles of vitamin C is to enhance the production of flu virus and superbug killing beta-interferon.

German research helps to clarify one angle of healthy immunity. Certain immune cells must be primed to go into action, and a key sign of their readiness is a small baseline production of beta-interferon. This enables a more vigorous production of interferon upon viral exposure, and they demonstrate that the interferon is specifically used to help your higher-powered immune response actually identify the invader for a targeted immune response. Without adequate interferon there is a delay or inefficiency in recognition, making it more difficult to identify the enemy and mount a response.

Interferon levels are boosted with vitamin C. In fact, it was just a few years ago when a paper was published explaining how vitamin C could contain a world-wide avian flu pandemic (at that time we were more concerned with the bird flu). This comprehensive review paper emphasized the importance of vitamin C in regards to the flu, and a flu pandemic in particular. The research suggests up to 5 grams of vitamin C per day for general health, 1 gram of vitamin C every hour to help fight off a bug, and much higher amounts if a flu bug has gained a toehold in you. There are no dangerous side effects to taking a higher dosage of natural Vitamin C. There are major side effects to increasing the dosage of pharmaceutically made antibodies that we are now told are useless against the alleged superbug that is now spreading around the World.

Public health officials are putting all their eggs in the experimental vaccine basket, a very careless gamble in defense of a flu pandemic. We have always been told to diversify to reduce risk, after all, one plan might not pan out as hoped. It is high time public health officials get rid of their perverted negative view of dietary supplements. Many lives hang in the balance. We are told antibodies do not kill the superbug so the choice for treatment and to kill the bug is obvious - Vitamin C. Vitamin C is truly a wonder nutrient and there is no doubt that many of the serious degenerative diseases plaguing the civilized world today can be prevented or even reversed through an adequate intake of this essential vitamin.

Man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.” ~ JFK

The UN and the World Bank leader are pushing for a new currency. They are calling for a global currency. UN countries should agree on the creation of a global reserve bank to issue the currency and to monitor the national exchange rates of its members, the Geneva-based UN Conference on Trade and Development declared.

UN countries should not agree to such a scheme. No country should even contemplate even the idea of an anti-sovereignty, anti-democratic global currency. Just look at what the EU did to the European countries. The EU dictates the policies of every country that is a member of the EU - all in direct violation of each country’s territorial, political and economic sovereignty. How many of you know that the European Union was devised by the Nazi Party of Adolf Hitler. The concept of a unified Europe was the goal of Adolph Hitler.

Back in 1942, a book called “The European Community” was published. Its principal author, a Doctor of Economics, had argued in 1940 for a “Central European Union” and “European Economic Area” and for fixed exchange rates - EMU in all but name. In this book, he wrote that “No nation in Europe can achieve on its own the highest level of economic freedom which is compatible with all social requirements…The formation of very large economic areas follows a natural law of development….interstate agreements in Europe will control [economic forces generally]…There must be a readiness to subordinate one’s own interests in certain cases to those of [the EC].”

One of his co-authors wrote that the “classic national dead…community of fate which is the European economy…fate and extent of European co-operation depends on a new unity economic plan”. Another observed that “We have a real European Community task before us…I am convinced that this Community effort will last beyond the end of the war.”

“Beyond the end of the war” explains everything. The principal author was Nazi Economics Minister and war criminal Walther Funk. In 1943, Walther Funk, Nazi Germany’s Minister for Economic Affairs and Head of the Reichsbank, outlined his ideas on the creation of a European economic area controlled by Nazi Germany in his book called “Walther Funk, The economic face of the new Europe”. The other two were respectively Nazi academic Heinrich Hunke and official Gustav Koenig. Nor were they just eccentrics. Goering’s orders in 1940 were followed by a project for the “large-scale economic unification of Europe” Goebbels, in the same year, compared Germany’s road to unification in the nineteenth century with Europe’s in the twentieth, believing that “in fifty years’ time [people] no longer think in terms of countries.”

On Remembrance Day remember the ultimate sacrifice paid by millions - not just military personnel, to stop Hitler from occupying Europe. How many lives were lost liberating the occupied countries of Europe? How many have spilled blood in the fight to restore the sovereignty of those countries? With the European Union, a Nazi ideology, in full control of the sovereign states of Europe, our grandfathers and our brothers have died in vain.

What Germany couldn’t achieve with war they did with the EU.

There is no need for a new global currency. We already have a global currency (the Federal Reserve Note) and the current global economic crisis has proven it doesn’t work. For decades the nations of the World has pegged their currency’s value against the privately owned counterfeit of the the United States Dollar. That counterfeit worthless piece of paper called the Federal Reserve Note is the root cause of the current US and World economic crisis. For decades the nations of the World allowed a small handful of private bankers to dictate the value of their currency and look where it has got them today. For decades the World has already been trading under a global currency - using the worthless counterfeits called the Federal Reserve Notes.

The simplest solution to the current economic crisis and to prevent another in the future is to stop using one nation’s currency for international trade. The solution is trade based on every country’s currency at parity (equal value) with every other country. That is to say that 1 US dollar would have the exact same value as 1 Canadian dollar or 1 Euro or 1 Yen or 1 Pound or … This eliminates one nation having superiority over other nations and eliminates any crisis that would arise should one country collapse as a result of debt, like the US. If every currency is at parity with each other confidence would remain uniform and strong.

Why should one country or an organization like the UN, the EU, the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank have control over the money of any other sovereign state? None have any authority over any country or each country’s people. Organizations like the UN, the WHO, the IMF, NATO and the EU should be banned. They are individuals who think that they can simply ignore the borders of each country, the sovereignty of each country and the economic prosperity of each country. They are all anti-Democratic. They are all anti-sovereignty.

During the Civil War (from 1861-1865), President Lincoln needed money to finance the War from the North. The Bankers were going to charge him 24% to 36% interest. Lincoln was horrified and went away greatly distressed, for he was a man of principle and would not think of plunging his beloved country into a debt that the country would find impossible to pay back.

Eventually President Lincoln was advised to get Congress to pass a law authorizing the printing of full legal tender Treasury notes to pay for the War effort. Lincoln recognized the great benefits of this issue. At one point hi wrote:

… (we) gave the people of this Republic the greatest blessing they have ever had - their own paper money to pay their own debts…

The Treasury notes were printed with green ink on the back, so the people called them “Greenbacks”.

Lincoln printed 400 million dollars worth of Greenbacks (the exact amount being $449,338,902), money that he delegated to be created, a bebt-free and interest-free money to finance the War. It served as legal tender for all debts, public and private. He printed it, paid it to the soldiers, to the U.S. Civil Service empoyees, and bought supplies for war.

Shortly after that happened, “The London Times” printed the following:

“if that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in th history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”

The Bankers obviously understood. The only thing that is a threat to their power is sovereign governments printing interest-free and debt-free paper money. They know it would break the power of the international Bankers.

After this was published in “The London Times”, the British Government, which was controlled by the London and other European Bankers, moved to support the Confederate South, hoping to defeat Lincoln and the Union, and destroy this government which they said had to be destroyed. But the North won the War, and the Union was preserved. America remained as one nation.

Of course, the Bankers were not going to give in that easy, for they were determined to put an end to Lincoln’s interest-free, debt-free Greenbacks. He was assassinated by an agent of the Bankers shortly after the War ended.

Thereafter, the Bankers controlled Congress revoked the Greenback Law and enacted, in its place, the National Banking Act. The national banks were to be privately owned (to this day they are still privately owned by the bankers of the Federal Reserve) and the national bank notes they issued were to be interest-bearing (to this day the privately owned Federal Reserve charges the United States people interest to print the worthless, illegal counterfeits called the Federal Reserve Notes). The Act also provided that the Greenbacks should be retired from circulation as soon as they came back to the Treasury in payment of taxes.

Former elected president of the United States, John F Kennedy, tried to warn the American people about this secretive organization that ruled the United States. He even tried to give the United States back to the people by abolishing the illegal Federal Reserve Act and taking the worthless counterfeit called the Federal Reserve Note out of circulation. Kennedy was assassinated for the same reason Lincoln was assassinated - for trying to get rid of the illegal Federal Reserve Banks and their illegal control of the United States money and bring back the legal interest free currency of the United States called the United States Dollar.

US Global Domination

How many know that the UN, the WHO, the IMF and NATO were all created by the United States? They were created as instruments for a US global domination of the World. They all were created by and are financed by the same bankers who illegally took control of the United States with the worthless interest bearing counterfeits called the Federal Reserve Note. The UN, the WHO, the IMF and NATO do whatever the US government (controlled by International bankers) tells them to do. They dictate US foreign policies. Every country that supports the UN, the WHO, the IMF and NATO are giving their political, territorial and economic sovereignty to the unelected shadow government of the United States. Not only should every country drop the worthless and illegal Federal Reserve Note as the main reserve currency but they should all withdraw their support for the UN, the WHO, the IMF, NATO and every organization that threatens their territorial, political and economic sovereignty - that includes the G8, G20 and the EU.

The World under economic slavery

Freedom from slavery is an internationally recognized human right. Article 4 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.” Economic slavery is what the UN, the IMF, the EU and the G20 have in mind for the World population - slavery is sought by these organizations as a legal institution or socio-economic system. The US is the perfect example of a government imposing a socio-economic slavery upon its citizens. The US government has been spending millions to brainwash the American people into believing that the US economic system is an exercise of free enterprise and that they are spending $trillions in support of free enterprise. That is totally false. The US abandoned free enterprise long ago in the aftermath of WW I in favor of Mussolini’s “corporatism,” i.e., economic fascism, where Big Business, Big Government, and Big Finance form combines to exploit the people with monopolized prices and a corrupted currency. Since Obama became the first non-American to become the president of the United States of America he has made economic fascism his presidential priority where Big Business, Big Government, and Big Finance have been formed to exploit the people with monopolized prices and a corrupted currency.

Fascism — a political philosophy, movement or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual, and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. (The state has power over every aspect of the economy to plan and regulate its workings. The factors of production are owned privately, but controlled by the gov­erning authorities as to what and how they are to produce, and what level of profits they are to retain.)

Capitalism — an economic system characterized by private or corpor­ate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by pri­vate decision rather than by state control, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market. (The state is neither to own nor operate the factors of production, nor to interfere in the peaceful decisions of their operation, leaving them to be controlled by the natural laws such as supply and demand that operate within the marketplace.)

Obviously the two systems are different in the fact that fascism advocates STATE control over the factors of production and their profits, while capitalism advocates PRIVATE control over those factors.

The primary distinction between the two systems is that capitalism is a system of economic organization without government involvement, thus its descriptive adjective of “laissez-faire,” which means to leave alone. The government’s job is basically to preserve the peace and perform those few limited functions granted by the Constitution.

Under fascism, the government’s job is to intervene into the marketplace to control all the various economic interactions of its participants. Its role is to manipulate the economic interactions through regulations and the conveyance of special privileges. Government assumes this power because it is felt that this is the only way stability and order can be maintained in society.

Under capitalism, the term “private” means free of government control or involvement. Thus, PRIVATE enterprise is FREE enterprise. Private businesses are entities in which the individual owners (rather than public officials) make the decisions of hiring, pricing, wage determination, production levels, policy planning, profit disposal, etc. Government is divorced from these economic decisions.

Under fascism, ownership of businesses are left in “private” hands, but the government rigidly regulates all businesses confiscating much of their profits and using them as the government sees fit. Thus business entities are private in name only. The term “private” is still used, but it no longer means free of government involvement. It is used within the context of government-business “cooperation.” However, such terminology is a fraud because there is never any cooperation when government is involved. Government simply tells businesses what it wants done and legally mandates that it be done. There is no choice in the matter. Those who don’t do as the government says are imprisoned or fined egregiously.

Fascism is thus a command economy where massive centralized government is developed to regulate its citizens’ lives. The major power centers of society — government, corporations, and banks — form a triad to monopolize and manipulate the economy according to their liking, their aggrandizement, and their profit at the expense of the individual and his rights.

“The essence of fascism,” writes Thomas J. DiLorenzo of Loyola College, “is that government should be the master, not the servant, of the people. Think about this. Does anyone in America really believe that this is not what we have now?

Look at the evidence. Since Obama became the de Facto president of the United States he has appointed czars to oversee new and complete State control over the American people. This appointing of czars is strictly prohibited by the Supreme Law of the United States of America - the US Constitution. These illegal actions by Obama are grounds for impeachment.

U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 2:

“.but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper,”

President Obama is appointing officials to his Executive Branch without conferring with the Senate. Here are some notables of his appointments as Czars:

Energy Czar: Carol M. Browner
Car Czar: Ed Montgomery
Health Care Czar: Nancy-Ann DeParle
Border Czar: Alan Bersin (Former US attorney).
Science Czar: John Holdren.
Green jobs Czar: Van Jones. - Admits being radicalized in jail. He has referred to himself as a communist and black nationalist. He said after the Rodney King riots he was a communist.

“It has taken President Barack Obama less than eight months to do what imperial Russia could not do in 400 years.”

Obama has appointed 31 “czars.” That’s more than ruled Russia during its entire imperial history. Originally, the title Czar (derived from Caesar) meant Emperor in the European medieval sense of the term, that is, a ruler who claims the same rank as a Roman emperor, with the approval of another emperor or a supreme ecclesiastical official. That would suggest that Obama claims to be the Emperor of the United States of America. The US Constitution strictly forbids Obama’s action - “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.” In the feudal system (in Europe and elsewhere), the nobility were generally those who held a fief, often land or office, under vassalage, i.e., in exchange for allegiance and various, mainly military, services to the Monarch.

Obama accepts a massive 18 karat gold chain necklace, from Saudi Arabia King Abdullah. The gold necklace is called the King Abdul Aziz Order of Merit, Saudi Arabia’s highest honor. “Those are only given to the very few friends of the king, and you are certainly one of those,” Abdullah said as he presented the thick chain and large medallion to Obama in an ornate meeting room with marble columns, engraved mirrors and a large chandelier. By accepting the highest honor bestowed by the King of Saudi Arabia, Obama has accepted the title of nobility in exchange for allegiances and various, mainly military, services to the Saudi Monarch. Obama illegally accepted a nobility title from the country that attacked the United States on September 11, 2001. The country that provided the majority if hijackers that carried out the attack against the US. The country of birth for bin Laden - the officially stated target for the United States unprovoked war of aggression against the sovereign foreign state of Afghanistan and its people.

In 1787 Doctor Benjamin Franklin was asked on the last day of the Constitutional Convention, while exiting the building: “Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”

Dr. Franklin answered: “A Republic, if you can keep it.”

Al Qaeda central headquarters, the George H.W. Bush Center for Central Intelligence in Langley, Va.

If there was a way to wipe out terrorism would you take action and wipe it out? There is a way to wipe out terrorism. You attack the source. You wipe out the organization that is solely responsible for every terrorist act committed since it’s creation. You wipe out the CIA.

The CIA is not a police force nor a peacekeeping organization. It is not an aid agency nor a relief agency. It is an organization of murderers, , mercenaries, kidnappers, saboteurs, bombers, torturers and assassins. They have one objective - terrorism - violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants (civilians). Today they carry out terrorist acts against the US and foreign states. Their newest illegal covert terrorist operation is code named Al Qaeda. Every named Al Qaeda terrorist can be traced back to being recruited by and trained by the CIA including Usma bin Laden. bin Laden was recruited by the CIA to fight the Soviet army during the Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan.

The mujahideen were financed, armed and trained by the United States CIA during the administrations of Carter and Reagan, and also by Saudi Arabia, Pakistan under Zia-ul-Haq, Iran, the People’s Republic of China and several Western European countries. Pakistan’s secret service, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), was used as an intermediary for most of these activities to disguise the sources of support for the resistance. One of the CIA’s longest and most expensive covert operations was the supplying of billions of dollars in arms to the Afghan mujahideen militants. The arms included Stinger missiles, shoulder-fired, antiaircraft weapons that they used against Soviet helicopters and later against commercial airliners. Osama bin Laden was among the recipients of U.S. arms. Between $3–$20 billion in U.S. funds were funneled into the country to train and equip the mujahideen with weapons, including Stinger surface-to-air missiles.

US financing of the mujahideen Islamic insurgency actually started before the Soviets invaded. The CIA was very active in the region with orders from Carter to “suck” the Soviets into Afghanistan. U.S. policy, unbeknownst even to the Mujahideen, was part of a larger strategy “to induce a Soviet military intervention.” National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski stated:

“According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise. That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Soviets into the Afghan trap…. The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter “We now have the opportunity of giving to the Soviet Union its Vietnam War.”

Under Reagan, U.S. support for the mujahideen evolved into an official U.S. foreign policy, known as the Reagan Doctrine, which included U.S. support for anti-Soviet movements in Afghanistan, Angola, Nicaragua, and elsewhere. Ronald Reagan praised mujahideen as “freedom fighters”.

Even after the mujahideen successfully drove the Soviets out of Afghanistan the CIA stayed in the region. It had more terrorist operations with new terrorist recruits to work on for the US government. During the Clinton administration the CIA provided propaganda for an upcoming terrorist operation against the United States of America. It created terrorist training camps in the mountains that border Pakistan and Afghanistan. The CIA made Saudi Arabian billionaire nationalist USAMA BIN LADEN leader of their Al Qaeda training camps and had him make regular appearances at these camps in order to recruit Pakistani, Afghan, Saudi, Egyptian and United Arab Emirate nationals. To make the fake Al Qaeda threat to the US look real then US president Bill Clinton ordered air strikes on these CIA terrorist training camps. No air strike ever took place, only propaganda reports issued by the CIA that they did. Then on the morning of 14 July 1999, the US government - Bill Clinton, ordered the CIA to assassinate Abdul Ahad Karzai, father of future puppet president of the future US occupied Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai, in order for the US to create a new false enemy of the US - the Taliban, and gain a needed ally.

Years before his father was assassinated by the CIA, Hamid Karzai worked for the CIA in helping to provide financial and military support for the Mujahideen during the 1980s Soviet war in Afghanistan. While Karzai’s brothers emigrated to the United States, Hamid Karzai remained in exile in Pakistan throughout the Soviet occupation. He accompanied the first Mujahideen leaders into Kabul in 1992 following the Soviet withdrawal. When the Taliban emerged in the mid 1990s, Karzai, like many other Afghans, supported them, because he saw them as a force that could finally end the violence and corruption in his country. However, he later broke with them and refused to serve as their ambassador to the United Nations, telling friends he felt the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) was wrongly using them. Karzai stated that “there were many wonderful people in the Taliban.” After the US accused the Taliban of their assassination of Karzai’s father Hamid Karzai worked closely with the CIA and the US to help gather Afghan drug warlord support for the anti-Taliban movement.

As the U.S. military was preparing for a confrontation with the Taliban in September 2001, Karzai began lobbying NATO nations to purge his country of Al-Qaeda. “These Arabs, together with their foreign supporters and the Taliban, destroyed miles and miles of homes and orchards and vineyards,” he told BBC, “They have killed Afghans. They have trained their guns on Afghan lives… We want them out.” What he was actually doing is doing what he was told and air the CIA propaganda called Al-Qaeda. These Arabs he is refering to is the CIA Saudi operatives that were commanded by the now infamous bin Laden. These Arabs are part of the US, Pakistani and Saudi Arabian financed and trained terrorist cell code named Al Qaeda. The US needed to link the Taliban with their CIA terrorist cell code named Al Qaeda. The Taliban were now the new enemy of the US, for one reason only - the Trans-Afghan pipeline - a proposed natural gas pipeline from Turkmenistan across Afghanistan to Pakistan that US oil companies wanted to build and control.

The Trans-Afghan pipeline was suppose to be the financial future of the Afghan people and the Taliban was negotiating with several countries, including the US, to build this natural gas pipeline through Afghanistan. The US oil giant Unocal wanted the contract to build the pipeline. Unocal Vice President John J. Maresca—later to become a Special Ambassador to Afghanistan— testified before the House of Representatives that until a single, unified, friendly government is in place in Afghanistan, the trans-Afghan pipeline will not be built. Unocal petitioned the US government on February 12, 1998.

Immediately after this U.S. INTERESTS IN THE CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ASIA AND THE PACIFIC, the Clinton administration made the Taliban the enemy of the US and the Afghan people and began planning for the false flag attacks against the US of September 11, 2001. Bill Clinton ordered the CIA to prepare to attack the US and blame it on the CIA recruited, financed and trained terrorists under the command of one Usama bin Laden. The US needed an excuse to go after the Taliban and remove them so that US oil companies could take control of the Afghan people’s financial future - the Trans-Afghan pipeline. On August 7, 1998 the CIA was ordered by Bill Clinton to Bomb US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing over 200. Immediately the US government of Bill Clinton blamed the attacks on al-Qaeda (the US own CIA terrorist cell). Bill Clinton ordered the bombings to coincide with the eighth anniversary of the arrival of US troops in Saudi Arabia in order to suggest an anti-US sentiment.

On August 20, 1998 the US claimed to have fired 66 missiles at six al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan and 13 missiles at a pharmaceutical factory in Khartoum, Sudan, in retaliation for the US embassy bombings. Back in the US President Clinton is widely accused of using the alleged missile strike to distract the US public from a personal sex scandal.

December 5, 1998: Unocal announces it is withdrawing from the CentGas pipeline consortium Reason given - President Clinton refuses to extend diplomatic recognition to the Taliban, making business there legally problematic.

The following year a top level US policy document explicitly confirms the US military’s readiness to fight a war for oil. The report, Strategic Assessment 1999, prepared for the US Joint Chiefs of Staff and the secretary of defense, states, “energy and resource issues will continue to shape international security,” and if an oil “problem” arises, “US forces might be used to ensure adequate supplies.” Oil conflicts over production facilities and transport routes, particularly in the Persian Gulf and Caspian regions, are specifically envisaged.

June 1999: Enron announces an agreement to build a $140 million power plant in the Gaza Strip, between Israel and Egypt. One of the major financiers for the project is the Saudi Binladin Group, a company owned by bin Laden’s family. This is the second attempted project between these two companies. Ninety percent complete, the construction will be halted because of Palestinian-Israeli violence and then Enron’s bankruptcy.

July-August 1999: About a dozen Afghan leaders visit the US. They are militia commanders, mostly Taliban, and some with ties to the CIA and their al-Qaeda training camps. A few are opponents of the Taliban. Their exact names and titles remain classified.

July 4, 1999: With the chances of a US pipeline deal with the Taliban looking increasingly unlikely, President Clinton finally issues an executive order prohibiting commercial transactions with the Taliban. The order also freezes the Taliban’s US assets. Clinton falsely accuses the Taliban of harboring bin Laden. Rapist Bill Clinton shows the World that the US is a sore loser.

October 12, 2000: USS Cole Bombed by the CIA and blamed on fictitious leader of the CIA own Al Qaeda terrorist cell. Seventeen US soldiers are killed and 30 are wounded. The CIA will later conclude that with just slightly better training, their attack would have killed 300 and sunk the ship.

December 19, 2000: US Seeks Taliban Overthrow; Considers Russia-US Invasion of Afghanistan - The Washington Post reports, “The United States has quietly begun to align itself with those in the Russian government calling for military action against Afghanistan and has toyed with the idea of a new raid to wipe out Osama bin Laden. Until it backed off under local pressure, it went so far as to explore whether a Central Asian country would permit the use of its territory for such a purpose.” Russia and the US are discussing “what kind of government should replace the Taliban. Thus, while claiming to oppose a military solution to the Afghan problem, the United States is now talking about the overthrow of a regime that controls nearly the entire country, in the hope it can be replaced with a hypothetical government that does not exist even on paper.”

January 21, 2001: George W. Bush is inaugurated as the 43rd US President, replacing Bill Clinton. Numerous figures in Bush’s administration have been directly employed in the oil industry, including Bush, Vice President Cheney, and National Security Adviser Rice. Rice had been on Chevron’s Board of Directors since 1991, and even had a Chevron oil tanker named after her. It is later revealed that Cheney is still being paid up to $1 million a year in “deferred payments” from Halliburton, the oil company he headed. Enron’s ties also reach deep into the administration.

March 1, 2001: CIA blows up two giant stone Buddhas of Bamiyan—ancient statues carved into an Afghan mountainside, which are considered priceless treasures. The CIA objective was to get the international community to no longer recoginze the Taliban as the government of Afghanistan. The Taliban receive great international condemnation in response to the CIA destruction of the Giant Buddha Statues.

August 2-3, 2001: A senior official in the Taliban’s defense ministry tells journalist Hamid Mir that the US will soon invade Afghanistan. Mir will later recall that he is told, “[W]e believe Americans are going to invade Afghanistan and they will do this before October 15, 2001, and justification for this would be either one of two options: Taliban got control of Afghanistan or a big major attack against American interests either inside America or elsewhere in the world.” Mir reports this information before 9/11, presumably in the newspaper in Pakistan that he works for. [Bergen, 2006, pp. 287] Interestingly, Afghan warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar made a similar prediction to Mir several months before (see April 2001). Also, several weeks earlier, US officials reportedly passed word to Taliban officials in a back channel meeting that the US may soon attack Afghanistan if the Taliban do not cooperate on building an oil and gas pipeline running through the country. According to one participant in the meeting, the US attack would take place “by the middle of October at the latest”

September 11, 2001: The CIA attacks New York City and Washington DC killing 3,000. Using CIA owned aircraft, painted to look like US commercial jets, the CIA flies remotely controlled unmanned aircrafts into the Towers of the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon. This is not the first time the CIA attacked the World Trade Centers. The 1993 World Trade Center bombing occurred on February 26, 1993, when a car bomb was detonated below the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City. The 1,500 lb (680 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device was intended to knock the North Tower (Tower One) into the South Tower (Tower Two), bringing both towers down and killing thousands of people. The accused attackers spent time at the CIA Al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan. Both World Trade Center attacks were ordered by the US government to steal the $billions in gold and silver bullion that were vaulted in the basements of the 2 Towers. As much as $160 Billion in bullion was stored under the Trade Center. The gold was owned by many foreign nations, central banks and official international organizations. Were Clinton failed George W Bush succeeded.

For the September 11, 2001 attacks the CIA used a modified version of a 1962 false flag attack against the United States called Operation Northwoods. The modified version that the CIA used on 9/11 blamed Al Qaeda instead of the original target - communist Cuba.

Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false-flag plan that originated within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of the Operation Northwoods plan was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.”

Operation Northwoods included proposals for hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. The plan stated:

“The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.”

Several other proposals were included within the Operation Northwoods plan, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. The U.S. government’s Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted and the proposals included in the plan were never executed - that is until September 11, 2001.

February 14, 2002: The Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv notes: “If one looks at the map of the big American bases created in the Afghan war, one is struck by the fact that they are completely identical to the route of the projected oil pipeline to the Indian Ocean.”

If every country focused on wiping out the CIA, Al Qaeda would also be wiped out. To this day the CIA recruits foreign nationals and trains them to carry out terrorists acts - code named Al Qaeda. If every country acted to wipe out the CIA the World could be free of this terrorist menace.

HAARP floating, self-propelled, mobile platform designed to operate in high winds and heavy seas. It is part of the U.S. Defense Department Ballistic Missile Defense System.

The United States weather modification weapon has been activated since October 26, 2010. It has been beaming millions of watts of electricity into the atmosphere on a daily bases since then and this is altering both the electromagnetic field of the Earth as well as manipulating the Earth’s atmospheric conditions resulting in volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, hurricane force winds and heavy rain storms.

HAARP is a US Air Force controlled military weapon that they built to own the weather. They have one land based HAARP installation in Alaska and as well as a floating platform that is moved around in total secrecy throughout both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans.

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 was a report written for the United States Air Force. The report examines the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future.

The report states that “In 2025, US aerospace forces can “own the weather” by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.

A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary.

In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.

In 2025, uninhabited aerospace vehicles (UAV) are routinely used for weather-modification operations. By cross-referencing desired attack times with wind and thunderstorm forecasts and the SPOT satellite’s projected orbit, the WFSE generates mission profiles for each UAV. The WFSE guides each UAV using near-real-time information from a networked sensor array.

Prior to the attack, which is coordinated with forecasted weather conditions, the UAVs begin cloud generation and seeding operations. UAVs disperse a cirrus shield to deny enemy visual and infrared (IR) surveillance. Simultaneously, microwave heaters create localized scintillation to disrupt active sensing via synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems such as the commercially available Canadian search and rescue satellite-aided tracking (SARSAT) that will be widely available in 2025. Other cloud seeding operations cause a developing thunderstorm to intensify over the target, severely limiting the enemy’s capability to defend. The WFSE monitors the entire operation in real-time and notes the successful completion of another very important but routine weather-modification mission. “

Owning the Weather in 2010

The United States Air Force has the technology to modify the weather anywhere in the World. It has it today, 15 years ahead of the report’s prediction. Their weather modification weapon is called HAARP. It has been used by the United States government against China (caused massive flooding), Russia (caused the heat wave that sparked huge fires and destroyed their crops), Pakistan (caused the massive flooding) and this past week in Asia (caused and continues to cause volcanic eruptions). Read for yourself what the United States Air Force is capable of doing by going to this link Table 1 - Operational Capabilities Matrix explains in detail what they have done to China, Russia, Pakistan, Asia and even North America.

HAARP’s own website tells us every time they activate their weather modification weapon. You can view this by going to their website and look at their Spectrum Monitor Waterfall Charts. The link to these charts are The yellow and orange colors are the massive energy spikes of the activated HAARP.

HAARP has been used exclusively since Barack Obama became president of the United States. George W Bush used the United States military to attack and cause destruction in foreign states. His atrocities against mankind were all out in the open. Obama’s atrocities against mankind are secretive and cowardly. In less than 2 years Obama has caused more damage and destruction against foreign states than all of the presidents before him. He is more dangerous than Adolf Hitler. He attacks civilians and civilian populations. He murders innocent women and children. Obama is committing crimes against humanity with HAARP.

Weather modification treaties and laws

Weather control is the act of manipulating or altering certain aspects of the environment to produce desirable changes in weather. Weather control can have the goal of preventing damaging weather, such as hurricanes or tornadoes, from occurring; of causing beneficial weather, such as rainfall in an area experiencing drought; or of provoking damaging weather against an enemy or rival, as a tactic of military or economic warfare. Weather modification in warfare has been banned by the United Nations.

In 1975, the US and Canada entered into an agreement under the auspices of the United Nations for the exchange of information on weather modification activity.

Weather control, particularly hostile weather warfare, was addressed by the “United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72, TIAS 9614 Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques”. The Convention was: Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977; Entered into force October 5, 1978; Ratification by U.S. President December 13, 1979; U.S. ratification deposited at New York January 17, 1980.


When patients are presented with chest pain or other high-risk symptoms of heart and respiratory problems, doctors increasingly rely on nuclear imaging and computed tomography (CT) tests to find out whether there is evidence of heart disease, blockages in the coronary arteries, reduced blood flow to the heart as well as to detect cancer. Results of these medical procedures claim to help guide life-saving prevention and treatment options. Those so-called life-saving prevention and treatment options can actually do more harm than good. Over 90% of the patients who took the advise of the medical community are now dead. I guess you could call death the cure to your excruciating pain and suffering caused by computer tomography tests and radiation treatment options.

Today in the news it was reported that “A special type of CT scan appears to be able to detect lung cancer early enough to save some lives, U.S. researchers announced Thursday — offering what could be the first screening test for the devastating disease.” The following report will demonstrate the absurdness of that statement by the the National Cancer Institute in the U.S.

We begin with research by K. Faulkner, B.Sc., A.R.C.S., M.Sc. and B. M. Moores, B.Sc., Ph.D. of the Regional Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Christie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute, Manchester. A programme has been set up to monitor the exposure of personnel during specific diagnostic procedures. This programme includes the investigation of radiation hazard associated with the operation of computed tomography (CT) scanners.

Scattered radiation distributions around CT computed tomography scanners and the associated radiation hazard to personnel

The first-generation CT scanners employed a rotatetranslate geometry where both the detectors and the X-ray tube moved around the patient. Since then, there have been many advances in the design of CT scanners, such as the introduction of a fan-beam geometry coupled with a multi-detector array. These design changes have had little effect on the number of photons employed in producing an image; any reduction in exposure time in later-generation units is balanced by an increase in beam size. However, the decrease in time of exposure and picture reconstruction has enabled the number of tomographic sections in any given period of time to be increased. This increase allows either a larger throughput of patients and/or more slices per patient. Consequently, the total magnitude of scattered radiation will increase.

We are exposed to radiation from natural sources all the time. The average person in the U.S. receives an effective dose of about 3 mSv per year from naturally occurring radioactive materials and cosmic radiation from outer space. These natural “background” doses vary throughout the country.

People living in the plateaus of Colorado or New Mexico receive about 1.5 mSv more per year than those living near sea level. The added dose from cosmic rays during a coast-to-coast round trip flight in a commercial airplane is about 0.03 mSv. Altitude plays a big role, but the largest source of background radiation comes from radon gas in our homes (about 2 mSv per year). Like other sources of background radiation, exposure to radon varies widely from one part of the country to another. ~ K. Faulkner

Computed tomography scanners exposes you to very high radiation levels.

Compare the radiation exposure from one chest x-ray to the amount of radiation exposure one experiences from our natural surroundings in 1 days. In just one CT scan (lasts just a few minutes) you are exposed to radiation levels that are hundreds, even thousands of times higher than natural radiation exposure. You are exposed to a radiation exposure level of 10 mSv for a typical abdominal region CT scan that lasts just a few minutes compared to 3 mSv exposure to natural surrounding radiation (from the Sun which is radiation we, animal life and plants need to survive) for an entire year - 365 days. If you were subjected to an abdominal region CT scan once every day for 1 year your unnatural radiation exposure level would be 3650 mSv - compared to just 3 mSv natural exposure for the same time period of 1 year. Even with just 1 CT scan your are receiving a very high level of unnatural radiation - 10 mSv unnatural radiation exposure level for 1 minute for a CT scan is extremely higher than what you are exposed to by natural surrounding radiation levels of 0.000005708 mSv per 1 minute.

Despite the widespread use and efforts to reduce exposure to radiation, the cancer causing effects of these diagnostic tests continue.

“These tests are so widely applied now, the concern is that there is some potential of increased cancer risk associated with their use,” said Jagat Narula, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine, and editor-in-chief of JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. “The problem is that most estimates of radiation exposure stem from an extrapolation of studies on World War II Hiroshima survivors, and the radiation exposure from imaging tests may not necessarily be the same.”

As with anything in medicine, a careful analysis of the risks and benefits of radiation imaging is warranted. Experts agree these tests should only be used when the clinical benefit is expected to exceed the potential harm. That being said, for the medical community to advise the population to get a CT scan on a regular bases in order to lower their chances of being inflicted with cancer is contradictory to medical research findings. It is the CT scanning that triggers cancer cell formation in otherwise very healthy people.

Your body’s cells, that make up tissues and organs, are damaged and destroyed by exposure to unnatural radiation exposure like that of the CT scanners. If the operator of the CT scan sets the machine to a higher than natural exposure level (natural exposure is 3 mSv / 365 days = 0.008219178 mSv per day or 0.000005708 mSv per minute) it will destroy the normal function of healthy cells in your body.

This is gross malpractice by the medical community. They are actually creating cancer by exposing a healthy person with very dangerous levels of radiation in a matter of minutes. Would you take the advise of the medical community if they advised you, a healthy person, to be shot with a bullet at least once a year in order to detect a gunshot wound? Would you enter a room or area that you know is contaminated with radiation or toxin? Would you go to a ball game or travel to a city or town if you knew beforehand that a terrorist was going to detonate a radioactive bomb there? Of course you wouldn’t. But that is exactly what the medical community is asking you to do. They are advising healthy people, like yourself, to enter a room where they will expose you to very high levels of radiation. They are advising you to willingly and voluntarily be exposed to very harmful radiation.

The CT radiation actually triggers cancer in a healthy person. The very high levels of man made radiation (10 mSv of man made radiation exposure for an abdominal CT scan compared to 0.000005708 mSv natural radiation exposure is very dangerous levels) gives birth to cancer. It immediately damages and destroys healthy cells. Any amount of direct exposure to man made radiation will immediately destroy the natural function of the cells in your body. CT scans and all other forms of medical tests and treatments including Chemotherapy exposes you to very high levels of unnatural radiation. For cancer patients they are exposed to extremely high levels of radiation in a very short period of time. Cancer patients in North America are exposed to higher levels of radiation than a dirty bomb. A dirty bomb’s purpose is to contaminate a wide area with radioactive material causing radiation poisoning, sickness and eventually death. Cancer treatment today does exactly that. Radiation poisoning or radiation sickness is a form of damage to organ tissue (cells) caused by excessive exposure to ionizing radiation. The term refers to acute problems caused by a large dosage of radiation in a short period. That is exactly what radiation treatment uses (ionizing radiation) and exactly what cancer CT scans, chemotherapy and radiation treatment does. They all damage organ tissues by exposing people to large dosages of ionizing radiation. That is why there is an over 90% death rate for cancer patients receiving radiation treatment. The radiation cancer treatment is actually destroying more healthy cells. Repeated man made radiation exposure eventually causes your body’s immune system to fail and you die - not from the cancer but from the exposure to very high levels of unnatural radiation in a very short period of time. You died a slow and very painful death as a result of radiation poisoning from the CT scans, chemotherapy and radiation treatment.

When soldiers risked their lives in the Gulf, they never imagined that their children might suffer the consequences of them being injected with untested vaccines. Children are born like this as the result of untested vaccine or prescription drugs and yes doctors prescribed it on the recommendations of the FDA and the assurances of the pharmaceutical industry.

The virus called Vaccinia contains within its genome several proteins that gives the virus resistance to your body’s natural immune defense system protein called interferons. Your body’s immune system is made up of special cells, proteins, tissues, and organs, that defends you against germs and microorganisms every day. The Vaccinia virus was used in the vaccine for smallpox but by using it to destroy one disease they created many other diseases.

Vaccines destroys the body’s natural immunization response to attacks by viruses and micro organisms by interfering with the body’s production and release of interferons. Interferons are proteins made and released by lymphocytes in response to the presence of pathogens as viruses, bacteria, parasites or tumor cells. They allow communication between cells to trigger the protective defenses of the immune system that eradicate pathogens or tumors. The Vaccinia virus was used in the vaccine for smallpox but it has since been scientifically proven to be what triggered the AIDS virus - AIDS (Acquired immune deficiency syndrome) was created by the World Health Organization under the Smallpox Eradication Program. The Vaccinia virus was intentionally used to cause an immune deficiency. It was genetically altered to be resistant to your body’s natural immune defense system protein called interferons. It was originally created to target a specific group of people - black people and the gay population. But because of interracial and bisexual sexual activity and resultant interracial off springs the virus has mutated and can now infect any and all races.

Interferons are named after their ability to “interfere” with viral replication within host cells. Interferons have other functions: they activate immune cells, such as natural killer cells and macrophages; they increase recognition of infection or tumor cells by up-regulating antigen presentation to T lymphocytes; and they increase the ability of uninfected host cells to resist new infection by virus. Certain host symptoms, such as aching muscles and fever, are related to your body’s production of interferons to fight the infection.

All interferons share several common effects; they are antiviral agents and can fight tumors.

As an infected cell dies from a cytolytic virus, viral particles are released that can infect nearby cells. However, the infected cell can warn neighboring cells of a viral presence by releasing interferon. The neighboring cells, in response to interferon, produce large amounts of an enzyme known as protein kinase R (PKR). This enzyme phosphorylates a protein known as eIF-2 in response to new viral infections; eIF-2 is a eukaryotic translation initiation factor that forms an inactive complex with another protein, called eIF2B, to reduce protein synthesis within the cell. Another cellular enzyme, RNAse L—also induced following PKR activation—destroys RNA within the cells to further reduce protein synthesis of both viral and host genes. Inhibited protein synthesis destroys both the virus and infected host cells. In addition, interferons induce production of hundreds of other proteins — known collectively as interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs)—that have roles in combating viruses. They also limit viral spread by increasing p53 activity, which kills virus-infected cells by promoting apoptosis. The effect of IFN on p53 is also linked to its protective role against certain cancers.

Another function of interferon is to upregulate major histocompatibility complex molecules, MHC I and MHC II, and increase immunoproteasome activity. Higher MHC I expression increases presentation of viral peptides to cytotoxic T cells, while the immunoproteasome processes viral peptides for loading onto the MHC I molecule, thereby increasing the recognition and killing of infected cells by T cells. Higher MHC II expression increases presentation of viral peptides to helper T cells; these cells release cytokines that signal to and co-ordinate the activity of other cells of the immune system. Interferons directly activate some other immune cells, such as macrophages and natural killer cells.

Production of interferons predominantly occurs in response to microbes, such as viruses and bacteria, and their products. Binding of molecules uniquely found in microbes—viral glycoproteins, viral RNA, bacterial endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide), bacterial flagella, CpG motifs–by pattern recognition receptors, such as membrane bound Toll like receptors or the cytoplasmic receptors RIG-I or MDA5, can trigger release of IFNs. Toll Like Receptor 3 (TLR3) is important for inducing interferon in response to the presence of double-stranded RNA viruses; the ligand for this receptor is double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). After binding dsRNA, this receptor activates the transcription factors IRF3 and NF-κB, which are important for initiating synthesis of many inflammatory proteins. Release of IFN from cells is also induced by mitogens. Other cytokines, such as interleukin 1, interleukin 2, interleukin-12, tumor necrosis factor and colony-stimulating factor, can also enhance interferon production.

Many viruses have been genetically altered or engineered in bio-weapons laboratories to resist interferon activity. They were intentionally engineered to circumvent the interferon response by blocking downstream signaling events that occur after the cytokine binds to its receptor, by preventing further interferon production, and by inhibiting the functions of proteins that are induced by interferons. Viruses that inhibit interferon signaling include; the AIDS virus, the Avian Flu Virus, Swine Flu (H1N1), the Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV), dengue type 2 virus (DEN-2) and viruses of the herpesvirus family, such as human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV or HHV8). Man made viral proteins that were intentionally created to affect interferon signaling include EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) and EBV nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA-2) from Epstein-Barr virus, the large T antigen of Polyomavirus, the E7 protein of Human papillomavirus (HPV), and the B18R protein of vaccinia virus (used by the World Health Organization in the smallpox vaccine to trigger AIDS).

Your body’s immune system protects you

The immune system is the body’s defense against infectious organisms and other invaders. Through a series of steps called the immune response, the immune system attacks organisms and substances that invade body systems and cause disease.

The immune system is made up of a network of cells, tissues, and organs that work together to protect the body. The cells involved are white blood cells, or leukocytes, which come in two basic types that combine to seek out and destroy disease-causing organisms or substances.

Leukocytes are produced or stored in many locations in the body, including the thymus, spleen, and bone marrow. For this reason, they’re called the lymphoid organs. There are also clumps of lymphoid tissue throughout the body, primarily as lymph nodes, that house the leukocytes.

The leukocytes circulate through the body between the organs and nodes via lymphatic vessels and blood vessels. In this way, the immune system works in a coordinated manner to monitor the body for germs or substances that might cause problems.

The two basic types of leukocytes are:

1. phagocytes, cells that chew up invading organisms
2. lymphocytes, cells that allow the body to remember and recognize previous invaders and help the body destroy them

A number of different cells are considered phagocytes. The most common type is the neutrophil, which primarily fights bacteria. If doctors are worried about a bacterial infection, they might order a blood test to see if a patient has an increased number of neutrophils triggered by the infection. Other types of phagocytes have their own jobs to make sure that the body responds appropriately to a specific type of invader.

The two kinds of lymphocytes are B lymphocytes and T lymphocytes. Lymphocytes start out in the bone marrow and either stay there and mature into B cells, or they leave for the thymus gland, where they mature into T cells. B lymphocytes and T lymphocytes have separate functions: B lymphocytes are like the body’s military intelligence system, seeking out their targets and sending defenses to lock onto them. T cells are like the soldiers, destroying the invaders that the intelligence system has identified.

Here’s how it works:

When antigens (foreign substances that invade the body) are detected, several types of cells work together to recognize them and respond. These cells trigger the B lymphocytes to produce antibodies, specialized proteins that lock onto specific antigens.

Once produced, these antibodies continue to exist in a person’s body, so that if the same antigen is presented to the immune system again, the antibodies are already there to do their job. So if someone gets sick with a certain disease, like chickenpox, that person typically doesn’t get sick from it again.

Although antibodies (produced naturally by your body’s immune system) can recognize an antigen and lock onto it, they are not capable of destroying it without help. That’s the job of the T cells, which are part of the system that destroys antigens that have been tagged by antibodies or cells that have been infected or somehow changed. T cells also are involved in helping signal other cells (like phagocytes) to do their jobs.

Your body’s naturally produced antibodies also neutralizes toxins (poisonous or damaging substances) produced by different organisms. Lastly, your body’s antibodies can activate a group of proteins called complement that are also part of the immune system. Complement assists in killing bacteria, viruses, or infected cells. All of these specialized cells and parts of the immune system offer the body protection against disease. This protection is called immunity. All vaccines are manufactured to be cause an immune deficiency by interfering with your body’s ability to naturally kill all viruses, bacteria, parasites and tumor cells. The virus or multiple viruses that are included in all vaccines have been genetically engineered in labs to be resistant to your body’s auto immune response resulting in healthy people (people with very strong immune system) getting sick. The addition of toxins like mercury and adjuvants to the vaccine are intentionally added to cause latent inflictions and diseases. Why?

Vaccines are very good for business but very bad for your health

The health care system is in the business of making money. They are not in the business of curing people. In order to stay in business they need to make money. In order to make money they need a sick population. The health care system and the pharmaceutical industry can only stay in business if there are sick people, so to keep their business going, and to keep the money coming in they genetically alter and engineer viruses and micro organisms that are resistant to your body’s natural defense system.

Since no one would willingly and knowingly inject a virus, microorganism, toxin or poison into their body they use terrorism to coerce the masses into voluntarily being infected and poisoned. No one was rushing to get the Swine flu (H1N1) vaccine in 2009 until after the World Health Organization, the CDC, the UN and the United States president terrorized the World population by fraudulently declaring that millions of people would die if the nations of the World didn’t vaccinate their people. Was the H1N1 virus a pandemic as declared by the WHO? Absolutely not. The seasonal flu virus killed more people than the Swine Flu (H1N1) virus. Car accidents killed more people in the US than the H1N1 virus. The United States wars of aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq killed millions of innocent Iraqi and Afghan people.

Every one who did get the H1N1 vaccine are now the fiscal property of the health care and pharmaceutical for profit industries. Off springs of the adults who were vaccinated will be born with immune deficiencies. Those children have been inflicted with disease from the day of their conception. Millions of innocent children will be born with immune deficiencies and the genetically engineered and altered viruses, microorganisms, pathogens, and parasites will make them all their prey. Even those still in the womb of their mother will be victims as their mother’s DNA has already been affected by the toxins and immune resistant viruses, organism, and parasites that were injected into her by a vaccine.


Every week around 10,000 people die of cancer. Government figures show the death rate for cancer deaths has not changed in the last 10 years. Chemo and radiation only save around 10% of the people treated. So this shows our doctors don’t have much to work with. Even with traditional treatments like Chemo and radiation more people die than are cured. That means as many as 90% of the people who have been diagnosed with having cancer will die. That statistic alone should be enough to warrant an immediate change in how cancer is treated. If there is only a 10% success rate then traditional treatment must be avoided and treatment with a much higher percentage of success must be used.

Many alternative cancer treatments exists today. Alternative treatments that are natural and thus safer than the traditional cancer treatments and more successful than the traditional treatments. One such treatment is available freely and has been used for centuries. That treatment is dandelion. The dandelion’s root has been used in China for certain kinds of cancers for centuries.

For many people, dandelions are simply a yard pest. However, dandelions are very rich in nutrients. The roots and leaves of the plant have been used as medicines for breast maladies, bloating, digestive disorders, aching joints, fevers, and skin disorders. The leaves of the plant are very rich in vitamins, including A, C, D, and B-complex. They also have high levels of minerals like iron, magnesium, zinc potassium, manganese, copper, choline, calcium, boron, and silicon. The most active ingredient in dandelions, eudesmanolide and germacranolide, are found only in dandelions.

The leaves of the plant are very nutrient-rich, and so they make good supplements for women who are pregnant or elderly women. Dandelion can also be used as a gentle diuretic and can decrease serum cholesterol in some people. The root can be an appetite stimulant and it can treat some digestive disorders. Today, many herbal doctors use dandelion to purify the liver and gallbladder of toxins. Research indicates that dandelions can treat pneumonia, bronchitis, and other respiratory disorders. Dandelion can improve general health, and is beneficial to the kidneys, pancreas, spleen, stomach, and other organs. Dandelion is also recommended for the treatment of tinnitus, tonsillitis, osteoporosis, abscesses, anemia, boils, mammary tumors, cirrhosis, water retention, hepatitis, jaundice, rheumatism, and warts. Dandelion may also be effective in eliminating or averting age spots. Some people also use toasted dandelion root as a healthier alternative to coffee.

Dandelion has been successful in treating prostate, colon, breast, liver and best of all lung cancer. In a recent clinical study a controlled group of people with lung cancer were administered dandelion root as a treatment for their lung cancer and all who participated in the study have been cured.

The medical professionals all know that the immune system controls the cancer cells in your body. As long as the immune system is healthy, you don’t usually have a cancer problem. When your immune system gets run down, it loses control of the cancer cells, and they start eating live cells and this is what they call cancer. Powder made from dandelion root has something in it that builds up the blood and the immune system.

When the immune system is built up so far, it gets back control of cancer cells, and they do an about face and start cleaning up the mess they’ve made. This is why you must have a fair appetite because your body must build itself up and be healthy if your immune system is going to be strong. This will not work for people that have lost their appetite or are on CHEMO. Doctors try to blast the cancer out of your body with Chemo or radiation. By doing so, it destroys your immune system and appetite. These are the most important things your body needs to beat cancer. Operations also knock the immune system haywire. This is why so many people that have operations for cancer find that a short time later it has spread somewhere else.

Many of the worst diseases that have plagued the world have been cured quite easily. Women use to dread the goiter more than cancer. A little iodine in the diet cured that. For hundred of years the most dreaded diseases was leprosy and lockjaw. A doctor found he could produce penicillin from moldy bread and could cure them and many more things. How long has moldy bread been around? I’m sure scientists will find many uses for the powder made from the root of the dandelions besides cancer. They have already found it builds up the blood so you heal much faster.

After taking dandelion root (the roots that you collected and prepared yourself) for three or four days, you will start to feel good, but nothing else. That is because your blood is building up. When you blood is happy, you’re happy. In most cases, the dandelion root treatment will rebuild your immune system in from three days to three weeks to the point it takes back control of cancer cells and thus the cancer stops spreading. You will feel a little better each week. You will feel a little less tired as each week goes by. After three weeks most of the cancer causing pain will be gone and when the pain starts to go away you know it’s working. If you have bone cancer in the spine, it will take three months to work. This is not an overnight cure. It took a while to get in this condition and it will take a while for your body to heal. The sooner you start, the quicker you will be over cancer. Young people heal faster than old people, but it will help at any age.

There are no side effects except when your body has had enough and it lets you know by getting heart burn. Then it’s time to back off some - reduce the amount you have been taking. Some people get stomach aches. That is their body trying to tell them that they need less. It also means your cancer is under control and you don’t need as much. You will also find you probably won’t catch a cold while you are taking it full strength.

The biggest enemy for dandelion root treatment is Chemo. The stronger the Chemo, the less chance the dandelion root power has to help you as Chemo tears your immune system and appetite down, two of the most important things you need to cure cancer. There is only a ten percent chance Chemo will cure you. With no chemo, your chances are 75 to 80% but you must take it every day. Don’t let your doctor give you that old threat if you turn him down that goes, “If you want to throw your life away, I can’t stop you”. Just remember that 90% of the people that took their advice and took chemo are in the cemetery. Don’t blame the doctor, he is doing his best with what he has to work with or you could ask for a written guarantee.

Dandelion is food, not a drug. In fact dandelion is one of those rare medicinal plants which is utilized by all its parts like stem, leaves, flowers, and even roots. Dandelion is also a blood purifier. Thus, it is effective for herbal treatment for anemia or blood related diseases. Dandelion is rich in natural calcium count; thus the herbal remedies by dandelion are prescribed for menorrhagia affected women to substantiate the blood loss due to excessive bleeding. If someone is facing the problem of low blood pressure and also suffer from anemia, herbal supplement of dandelion can help him/her immensely. Dandelion works efficiently as a natural energizer as well as it reduces the problem of acidity remarkably. This is one of the reasons herbal supplements of dandelion is often prescribed for those people who are on weight loss program; natural back up of dandelion helps to neutralize acidity in body and supply energy as well. Dandelion also helps in flushing harmful toxins from our body and helps to cleanse the entire health system. So if you are sick and tired of being sick and tired, the dandelion is the cure.