Strict Standards: Only variables should be passed by reference in /home/preswquq/public_html/nbg/fp-includes/core/core.fpdb.class.php on line 302 recently received an email from US President Barack Obama regarding his next reform task - Wall Street Reform. I am becoming increasingly alarmed at all the reforming that Obama is doing with the US. Too much reform, too much government involvement in any private sector business, banking, labor, trade, health care, industry or education can only result in fascism or worse, communism for the people of the United States of America. The fundamental purpose of government is the maintenance of basic security and public order. Governments of all the countries, including the United States of America, have five purposes. They are defense, national identity, representation, social welfare and infrastructure. If the US is suppose to be a democracy then what is Obama doing? The two principles of democracy are equality and freedom. These principles are reflected in all citizens being equal before the law and having equal access to power and the freedom of its citizens is secured by legitimized rights and liberties which are generally protected by a constitution. What Obama has been doing and continues to do is interfere with the legitimized rights and liberties protected by the United States Constitution. A government has basically three branches - the Executive, the Legislative and the Judicial that help in the functioning of a government. Obama has assumed he has complete control over all three branches. That my friends is a dictatorship.

Letter from Obama to the editor of
Fri, 16 Apr 2010

Paul –

It has now been well over a year since the near collapse of our entire financial system that cost the nation more than 8 million jobs. To this day, hard-working families struggle to make ends meet.

We’ve made strides — businesses are starting to hire, Americans are finding jobs, and neighbors who had given up looking are returning to the job market with new hope. But the flaws in our financial system that led to this crisis remain unresolved.

Wall Street titans still recklessly speculate with borrowed money. Big banks and credit card companies stack the deck to earn millions while far too many middle-class families, who have done everything right, can barely pay their bills or save for a better future.

We cannot delay action any longer. It is time to hold the big banks accountable to the people they serve, establish the strongest consumer protections in our nation’s history — and ensure that taxpayers will never again be forced to bail out big banks because they are “too big to fail.”

That is what Wall Street reform will achieve, why I am so committed to making it happen, and why I’m asking for your help today.

Please stand with me to show your support for Wall Street reform:

We know that without enforceable, commonsense rules to check abuse and protect families, markets are not truly free. Wall Street reform will foster a strong and vibrant financial sector so that businesses can get loans; families can afford mortgages; entrepreneurs can find the capital to start a new company, sell a new product, or offer a new service.

Consumer financial protections are currently spread across seven different government agencies. Wall Street reform will create one single Consumer Financial Protection Agency — tasked with preventing predatory practices and making sure you get the clear information, not fine print, needed to avoid ballooning mortgage payments or credit card rate hikes.

Reform will provide crucial new oversight, give shareholders a say on salaries and bonuses, and create new tools to break up failing financial firms so that taxpayers aren’t forced into another unfair bailout. And reform will keep our economy secure by ensuring that no single firm can bring down the whole financial system.

With so much at stake, it is not surprising that allies of the big banks and Wall Street lenders have already launched a multi-million-dollar ad campaign to fight these changes. Arm-twisting lobbyists are already storming Capitol Hill, seeking to undermine the strong bipartisan foundation of reform with loopholes and exemptions for the most egregious abusers of consumers.

I won’t accept anything short of the full protection that our citizens deserve and our economy needs. It’s a fight worth having, and it is a fight we can win — if we stand up and speak out together.

So I’m asking you to join me, starting today, by adding your name as a strong supporter of Wall Street reform:

Thank you,

President Barack Obama

The problem is Mr Obama is that there is already a system in place that protects the people but you and George W Bush blocked US law enforcement agencies, the FBI, the SEC and Congress from investigating and auditing the banks that created and implemented the US financial crisis. Your Stimulus Package and Bush’s Bailout of the banks was a blank check for the banks of the US Federal Reserve. You and Bush gave these criminals the tools they needed to carry out the greatest heist in the history of the World and to top it all off you and Bush both gave them immunity - no congressional or judicial oversight. That makes you and Bush accomplices.

Mr Obama your “stimulus” package has been a nightmare for the US taxpayers. Your administration has failed to track the dollars, there are no verifiable numbers on jobs created or funded (rhetoric notwithstanding), and agencies have funded thousands of wasteful and ineffective projects. The Office of Inspector General report reveals that not only is it nearly impossible to track the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) spending down to the very last dime, accelerated stimulus spending also has, and will continue to have, a negative impact on the federal government’s ability to monitor hundreds of billions of dollars in other, non-ARRA grants and contracts.

The solution is already available - an audit. An audit would reveal the criminal activities of the bankers of the US Federal Reserve Banks that caused the US financial crisis. An audit would reveal that the Feds commited fraud when they simply declared that they lost $billions - no evidence has to this day been given to confirm those fraudulently claimed loses. An audit would prevent a future crisis of this scale because if the public saw that those responsible for the crisis were indicted and imprisoned then no one would dare do it again. There are already enough laws. Laws and agencies exited before this crisis and they should have been allowed to act at the first sign of trouble.


On April 22, 2010 an unmanned Atlas rocket carrying a miniature space shuttle blasted off from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. The US military has built and launched an unmanned military aircraft in orbit around Earth, in direct violation of the Outer Space Treaty of 1967. The unmanned spacecraft can stay in orbit for months on end. It was built as a first strike spacecraft. The latest unmanned spacecraft launched by the US has triggered concerns in China over a new arms race in space as the “small shuttle” is reported to have platforms to launch various types of missiles.

The US could position this spacecraft over any country, open its cargo bay doors and launch a nuclear, biological or any other WMD. This spacecraft gives the US the capacity and capability to launch missiles from space and with the aid of Earth’s gravity and the zero gravity of space, a missile being launched can achieve Mach 7 or faster. The US has been very secretive about this mission. Perhaps it is because the X-37B is carrying a missile or missiles or the spacecraft itself is a weapon. No matter, the US has made it be known that it is its intention to militarize space in violation of the Outer Space Treaty - a treaty ratified by ninety five nations and entered into force on October 10, 1963.

Outer Space Treaty (1967)

Multilateral agreement signed and ratified between the U.S., U.S.S.R., and U.K. banning:

* …placement of nuclear weapons or “weapons of mass destruction” in orbit around the Earth.
* …installation of nuclear weapons or “weapons of mass destruction” on the moon, on any other celestial body, or in outer space
* …use of the moon or any celestial body for military purposes, including weapons testing of any kind.

The Outer Space Treaty, as it is known, was the second of the so-called “nonarmament” treaties; its concepts and some of its provisions were modeled on its predecessor, the Antarctic Treaty. Like that Treaty it sought to prevent “a new form of colonial competition” and the possible damage that self-seeking exploitation might cause.

In early 1957, even before the launching of Sputnik in October, developments in rocketry led the United States to propose international verification of the testing of space objects. The development of an inspection system for outer space was part of a Western proposal for partial disarmament put forward in August 1957. The Soviet Union, however, which was in the midst of testing its first ICBM and was about to orbit its first Earth satellite, did not accept these proposals.

Between 1959 and 1962 the Western powers made a series of proposals to bar the use of outer space for military purposes. Their successive plans for general and complete disarmament included provisions to ban the orbiting and stationing in outer space of weapons of mass destruction. Addressing the General Assembly on September 22, 1960, President Eisenhower proposed that the principles of the Antarctic Treaty be applied to outer space and celestial bodies.

Soviet plans for general and complete disarmament between 1960 and 1962 included provisions for ensuring the peaceful use of outer space. The Soviet Union, however, would not separate outer space from other disarmament issues, nor would it agree to restrict outer space to peaceful uses unless U.S. foreign bases at which short-range and medium-range missiles were stationed were eliminated also.

The Western powers declined to accept the Soviet approach; the linkage, they held, would upset the military balance and weaken the security of the West.

After the signing of the Limited Test Ban Treaty, the Soviet Unions position changed. It ceased to link an agreement on outer space with the question of foreign bases. On September 19, 1963, Foreign Minister Gromyko told the General Assembly that the Soviet Union wished to conclude an agreement banning the orbiting of objects carrying nuclear weapons. Ambassador Stevenson stated that the United States had no intention of orbiting weapons of mass destruction, installing them on celestial bodies or stationing them in outer space. The General Assembly unanimously adopted a resolution on October 17, 1963, welcoming the Soviet and U.S. statements and calling upon all states to refrain from introducing weapons of mass destruction into outer space.

The United States supported the resolution, despite the absence of any provisions for verification; the capabilities of its space-tracking systems, it was estimated, were adequate for detecting launchings and devices in orbit.

Seeking to sustain the momentum for arms control agreements, the United States in 1965 and 1966 pressed for a Treaty that would give further substance to the U.N. resolution.

On June 16, 1966, both the United States and the Soviet Union submitted draft treaties. The U.S. draft dealt only with celestial bodies; the Soviet draft covered the whole outer space environment. The United States accepted the Soviet position on the scope of the Treaty, and by September agreement had been reached in discussions at Geneva on most Treaty provisions. Differences on the few remaining issues — chiefly involving access to facilities on celestial bodies, reporting on space activities, and the use of military equipment and personnel in space exploration — were satisfactorily resolved in private consultations during the General Assembly session by December.

On the 19th of that month the General Assembly approved by acclamation a resolution commending the Treaty. It was opened for signature at Washington, London, and Moscow on January 27, 1967. On April 25 the Senate gave unanimous consent to its ratification, and the Treaty entered into force on October 10, 1967.

The substance of the arms control provisions is in Article IV. This article restricts activities in two ways:

First , it contains an undertaking not to place in orbit around the Earth, install on the moon or any other celestial body, or otherwise station in outer space, nuclear or any other weapons of mass destruction.

Second , it limits the use of the moon and other celestial bodies exclusively to peaceful purposes and expressly prohibits their use for establishing military bases, installation, or fortifications; testing weapons of any kind; or conducting military maneuvers.


The US is heading towards becoming a fascist state. The signs of fascism are everywhere in the United States.

Michelle Obama stated during a speech at UCLA on Febrary 18, 2008:

“Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.”

We will overthrow Parliament in a legal way through legal means. Democracy will be overthrown with the tools of democracy.” Adolf Hitler

Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way around to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise. ” - Adolp HItler

Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power.” - Benito Mussolini

The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to the point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its essence is fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group or any controlling private power. ” - President Franklin Delano Roosevelt - on the threat to democracy by corporate power.

The writing is literally on the wall with posters of Obama displaying fascist slogans like:

1. “Yes We Can”
2. “Change” versus “More of the Same”
3. “Vote for Change”
4. “Change We Can Believe In”
5. “Our Time for Change”
6. “It’s about Time. It’s about Change”
7. “Stand for Change”
8. “Organize for Change”
9. “We are the change we’ve been looking for. Change can’t happen without you.”
10. “I’m asking you to believe. Not just in my ability to bring about real change in Washington . I’m asking you to believe in yours.”
11. “A leader who can deliver change”
12. “Change in America doesn’t start from the top down. It starts from the bottom up.”
13. “Obama Momma”
14. “Women for Obama”
15. “Obama for America ”
16. “A New Beginning”
17. “Help me take back America ”
18. ” America , we cannot turn back. We cannot walk alone.”
21. “We must pledge once more to walk into the future.”

Beware the liberal fascists - the leaders who aim to ’save’ us by controlling everything we do. Barack Obama loves telling us how to live. ‘We are the ones we’ve been waiting for,’ Obama told mesmerised crowds.

The Declaration of Independence

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.


New magazine look for This online issue of PRESS Core deals with the growing concern and issues with US President Barack Obama. From his eligibility to be commander-in-chief and president of the United States of America that has constantly been questioned by the public, US lawmakers and military personnel, to his conflict of interest regarding the largest heist in US history that has been instigated by the bankers of the privately owned US Federal Reserve Banks. What is more alarming is the fact that the US government never questioned Obama about his political views when they allowed him to campaign for the highest office of the United States government. The US people went to war to stop the spread of communism yet today they have a president with an agenda to suspend the United States Constitution and implement dictatorial communist rule over the United States people.

President Barack Obama arrived in Mexico Thursday April 16, 2009. Obama met with Mexican President Felipe Calderon. Obama was received at Mexico’s anthropology museum in Mexico City by Felipe Solis, a distinguished archeologist who died the following day from symptoms similar to flu outbreak

Today is the 1 year anniversary of biological weapons expert Marc S Griswold returning to the US from Mexico after successfully releasing the Swine Flu virus. Marc S Griswold was ordered by US President Obama to take vials of the swine flu virus from the US biological weapons research lab at Fort Detrick Maryland and transport the vials via Air Force One to Mexico. The vials contained samples of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis, a virus that sickens horses and can be spread to humans by mosquitoes. In 97 percent of cases, humans with the virus suffer flu-like symptoms, but it can be deadly in about 1 out of 100 cases, according to Caree Vander Linden, a spokeswoman for the Army’s Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. There is an effective vaccine for the disease and there hasn’t been an outbreak in the United States since 1971 - when the CIA used the swine tested Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis virus as a bio weapon in Cuba 1971. The US government renamed the Swine Flu as the A-H1N1 virus for this reason. The virus released was actually the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis virus. The sudden death of 21 polo horses in Florida in late April of 2009 was caused by the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis virus. The animals, owned by a team from Caracas, Venezuela, had just arrived at the U.S. Polo Tournament in Wellington when 14 of them collapsed. Another seven were disoriented and staggering. Dr. Scott Swerdlin of the Palm Beach Equine Club, International Polo’s consulting veterinarian group says 14 died at the grounds, one was euthanized and the others died within 45 minutes at the Venezuelan team’s barn. The horses suffered pulmonary edema, which means fluid accumulated in their lungs, and cardiogenic shock - documented effects of the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis virus.

Epizootic strains of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) cause epidemics by exploiting equines as highly efficient amplification hosts for mosquito transmission. Although phylogenetic studies indicate that epizootic VEEV strains emerge via mutation from enzootic progenitors that are incapable of efficient equine amplification, the molecular mechanism(s) involved remain enigmatic. The convergent evolution of E2 envelope glycoprotein mutations suggests that they are critical to VEEV emergence, but little is known about the role of non-envelope genes. Guinea pigs, the small animal model that best predicts the ability to generate equine viremia, were used to assess the role of envelope versus other mutations in the epizootic phenotype.

You all have heard of people complaining that they are being used as guinea pigs. Well for decades, pharmaceutical companies have been using guinea pigs and other pigs to test their toxic poisons they call drugs and vaccines before they begin conducting human trials. That is why the US government chose to call the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis virus the Swine Flu virus - because their biological weapons research labs used guinea pigs (swines) to develop their biological weapon that they released April of 2009.

Why did Obama order the virus released? Obama was furious with the American people for staging a nation wide Tax Day Tea Party revolt on April 15, 2009. The American people stood united against Obama and the US government’s out of control spending and money laundering of $trillions of their tax dollars to the banks that make up the privately owned US Federal Reserve Banks.

Marc S. Griswold, a former Secret Service agent who was serving as the lead advance special agent for Energy Secretary Steven Chu on Obama’s mid-April trip, said in an interview that the minor cough he developed in Mexico grew into swine flu. Although he has recovered and is back to work, he and his family have watched in shock as his illness has sparked national security concerns.

At the White House, press secretary Robert Gibbs did not identify Griswold by name but said officials asked the infected agent whether he remembers coming within six feet of the president during the trip. The answer was no, Gibbs told reporters. Obama’s doctor, David Martin, issued a letter to more than 100 White House staffers and reporters, alerting them that they had been exposed but expressing confidence that further infections were unlikely.

“The president, as I’ve said here many times, has not experienced any symptoms, and the doctors see no need to conduct any tests,” Gibbs said.

Griswold stated that his symptoms started innocuously, with a minor cough that began soon after his trip to Mexico as part of the president’s entourage.

Obama and Chu, accompanied by Griswold, were part of a “working dinner” in Mexico on April 16.

How did the H1N1 virus spread globally? Marc S. Griswold returned from Mexico on April 18, officials said, on United Flight 822 to Dulles International Airport. Washington Dulles International Airport is a public airport located 25 miles (40 km) west of the central business district of Washington, D.C., in Dulles, Virginia. Dulles is served by nearly a dozen U.S.-flagged carriers and nearly two dozen international carriers. Airlines serving Dulles provide non-stop service to over 80 domestic destinations and to over 40 international destinations. On a typical day, Dulles sees 1,000 to 1,200 flight operations.

When word got out that Agent Marc S. Griswold was infected with the A-H1N1 virus the government was only concerned about the health of president Obama. No one sought to contact everyone on the same flight as Griswold. If you have a confirmed case of an influenza outbreak the immediate response is for the government to immediately track down everyone who came in contact with Patient Zero and initiate a quarantine. No one, not even Obama, bothered to spring into to action to prevent the spread of the A-H1N1 virus that the WHO very quickly declared a pandemic. Obama, the WHO and the CDC failed to do their job to protect the people from this influenza outbreak. It is as if they wanted it to happen. Instead of quarantining Griswold, his family, and everyone who came in contact with Griswold on United Airlines Flight 822 they allowed the A-H1N1 influenza virus to spread. Dulles international airport was the hub for the A-H1N1 virus to spread globally.

Charges laid against WHO, UN and Obama for bio terrorism.

Jane Burgermeister, an Austrian Investigative journalist, filed charges with the FBI in Austria on June 10, 2009 against the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations (UN), and several of the highest ranking members of the U.S. Federal government, including President Obama and corporate officials, concerning bioterrorism and attempts to commit mass murder. It remains to be seen whether the FBI will conduct an investigation or reveal more complicity in keeping heinous crimes covered up.

Burgermeister prepared an injunction against a forced vaccination that was being sought by Oabama. In April she filed charges against Baxter AG and Avir Green Hills Biotechnology of Austria for producing contaminated bird flu vaccine, with allegations that this was a deliberate act to cause and profit from a worldwide pandemic.

Burgermeister has presented evidence of acts of bioterrorism that is in violation of U.S. law, committed by a group that is operating in the U.S. under the direction of International bankers who control the Federal Reserve, WHO, the UN and NATO for the purpose of carrying out mass genocide against the U.S. population by using a genetically engineered flu pandemic virus with the intention of causing a massive amount of deaths. Unsurprisingly, this group involves officials holding high U.S. government offices. Leaders in the Center for Disease Control (CDC) also allegedly know that the vaccine is not safe.

Summary of the Bioterrorism charges filed with the FBI

I. Introduction: Summary of Claims by Jane Burgermeister in her Bioterrorism Criminal Charges with the FBI
II. Factual Background
III. Evidence the “swine flu“ vaccines meets the criteria for definition as “bioweapons”
IV. Scientific evidence the “swine flu” virus is an artificial (genetically engineered) virus
V. Scientific evidence the “swine flu” was bioengineered to resemble the Spanish flu killer virus
of 1918
VI. Genome sequence of the “swine flu”
VII. Evidence as to the role of Baxter and WHO in producing and releasing 72 kilos of lethal pandemic virus material in Austria, nearly triggering a pandemic this winter
VIII. Evidence Baxter is an element in a covert bioweapons network: Baxter officers
IX. Evidence Baxter has deliberately contaminated drugs
X. Evidence Novartis is using vaccines as bioweapons.
XI. Evidence as to the WHO’s role in the bioweapons program: supplier of the bird flu virus to Baxter
XII. Evidence as to deliberate release of the “swine flu” virus in Mexico
XIII. Evidence as to the involvement of President Obama
XIV. Evidence as to WHO’s manipulation of disease data in order to justify declaring a Pandemic Level 6 in order to seize control of the USA
XV. Evidence as to FDA’s role in covering up the bioweapons program
XVI. Evidence as to the Canada’s National Microbiology Labs role in the bioweapons program
XVI. Evidence of the involvement of scientists working for the UK’s NIBSC, and the CDC in engineering the swine flu
XVII. Evidence vaccinations caused the Spanish killer flu of 1918: a lack of quality control then as now
XVIII. Precedents: the abandoned swine flu mass vaccination program of 1976
XIX. Inadequate performance of the government in stopping the spread of the swine flu as cover for spreading a pandemic: evidence as to lax controls at government labs (Fort Detrick)
XX. Evidence as to manipulation of the legal framework to allow mass vaccination by force
XXII. Constitutional issues: the legality v. illegality of jeopardising the Life, Health and “Public good” by mass vaccinations
XXI. The issue of immunity and compensation as evidence of intent to commit a crime XXII. Evidence as to the use of chemtrails for as an element in a larger biological warfare against the target US population
XXIII. Evidence as to the existence of an international corporate crime syndicate
XXIV. Evidence as to the existence of the “Illuminati” and to a pattern of activities that violate laws on racketeering influenced organised crime
XXV. Evidence of the Illuminati’s involvement in the current collapse of the world’s financial system
XXVI. Evidence as to the depopulation agenda of the Illuminati/Bilderbergs and their involvement in the engineering and release of “flu” pandemic virus
XXVII. Evidence as to a genocide agenda by means of weaponised flu being discussed at the annual Bilderberg meeting in Athens from May 14-17, 2009
XXVIII. Evidence as to the profits of pharmaceutical companies in the event of a pandemic
XXIX. Adjuvants: Evidence that the swine flu vaccine is planned to cause harm

Members of this criminal syndicate allegedly include: U.S. President Barack Obama, UN System Coordinator for Influenza David Nabarro, Director-General of WHO Margaret Chan, U.S. Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sibelius, U.S. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, bankers David de Rotschild, David Rockefeller and George Soros, Chancellor of Austria Werner Faymann and Austrian Health Minister Alois Stoger among others.

The charges filed by Burgermeister contend that the defendants mentioned above conspired with each other and others to develop, fund and participate in the final phase of implementing a covert international bioweapons program that also involves Pharmaceutical giants Baxter and Novartis.

By bioengineering and releasing lethal biological agents — the ‘bird flu’ virus and the ’swine flu virus’ — as a pretext for implementing a forced mass vaccination program, the syndicate would be able to administer a toxic biological agent that causes death and injury to the people of the U.S. in direct violation of the Biological Weapons Anti-terrorism Act.

She presented evidence revealing that the bird flu and the swine flu viruses were in fact bioengineered in laboratories using funding that was supplied by WHO and other government agencies among others, charges that the entire ’swine flu’ pandemic business is a massive lie and that there is no natural virus that poses a threat to the population. According to many experts, the ’swine flu’ is part swine flu, part human flu and part bird flu, a hybrid that can only come from laboratories.

Claims from WHO that this ’swine flu’ is a pandemic are intentionally misleading, probably because the viruses that were released were created and released with the help of WHO, making them responsible for the ‘pandemic’ in the first place. Also noted by Burgermeister is the fact that the death figures reported as ’swine flu’ are inconsistent and there is no clarity as to how the number of ‘deaths’ are documented.

A pandemic could occur if mass vaccinations of the tainted vaccine are carried out under the guise of protecting populations since there is evidence showing that mandatory vaccines have been intentionally contaminated to cause death.

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, the National Emergency Act, National Security Presidential Directive 51, Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20 and the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza were designed in part to require vaccinations in the event of ‘National Emergencies’ or ‘pandemics.’

A 69-page document was presented as evidence by Burgermeister in her June 10, 2009 filing to substantiate her charges. More disturbingly, she presents evidence of the deliberate release of the ’swine flu’ in Mexico, conveniently timed to coincide with President Obama’s trip to Mexico.

Marc S Griswold has the perfect credentials, infectious disease knowledge and experience and access to biologically weaponized viruses to be selected by Obama to launch a biological attack against Mexico, the US and the World. The media only focused on his title of Special Agent at U.S. Department of Energy so that the connection between this agent of the US government and the H1N1 virus outbreak would not be noticed. Further investigation is required. There are just too many coincidences for this to be just a coincidence. Motive, means and opportunity exists to warrant a full and thorough investigation. This would not be the first time a virus was intentionally released by an agent of the US government. January 9 1977 : The New York daily Newsday ran an article where a CIA agent admitted that he was involved in introducing a virus into Cuba which in 1971 caused an outbreak of African swine fever. With at least the tacit backing of U.S. Central Intelligence Agency officials, operatives linked to anti-Castro terrorists introduced the African swine fever virus into Cuba in 1971. The 1971 outbreak, the first and only time the disease has hit the Western Hemisphere, was labeled the “most alarming event” of 1971 by the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization. African swine fever is a highly contagious and usually lethal viral disease that infects only pigs and, unlike swine flu, cannot be transmitted to humans. The CIA agent stated he was given the virus in a sealed, unmarked container at a U.S. Army base and CIA training ground in the Panama Canal Zone, with instructions to turn it over to the anti-Castro group. The virus was carried aboard a trawler to Navassa Island, a tiny, deserted, U.S.-owned island between Jamaica and Haiti. From there, after the trawler made a brief stopover, the container was taken to Cuba and given to other operatives on the southern coast near the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo Bay. On January 15, 1977 A U.S. Senator with the United States Senate Select Committee demanded that then CIA Director George Bush provide information about the bacteriological attack against Cuba. By January 20, 1977 George HW Bush was no longer CIA Director a post he held for less than a year - January 30, 1976 when Bush replaced acting CIA director William Colby – January 20, 1977 - After Jimmy Carter’s Democratic administration took power in 1977.

In retrospect, Poland was the only EU country that refused to order the vaccines when the pandemic was announced. “It’s not about satisfaction. We don’t want to be seen as a country which opposes vaccines, we want to protect our citizens but not under the conditions set by the pharmaceutical companies,” health ministry spokesman Piotr Olechno told the BBC in February 2010.

Mr Olechno said the government had decided not to buy the vaccines because it could not guarantee there were no side effects and it did not want to take responsibility for those.

“We don’t think that the vaccine is dangerous but we cannot agree with the pharmaceutical companies not taking responsibility for the potential side effects,” said Mr Olechno.

“The companies wanted the government to take responsibility for any potential side effects and that contravenes Polish law.”

On March 31, 2010 Nowe Media, Polskie Radio published an article “Poland praised for anti-swine flu strategy “.

The Council of Europe has praised Poland’s Health Minister Ewa Kopacz for her strategy against the swine flu virus.

The council’s Committee on Social, Health and Family Affairs said that the Health Ministry’s decision not to order any A/H1N1 vaccines, in spite of pressure from pharmaceutical companies and health organizations, was correct.

Ewa Kopacz went to Paris to explain her government’s response to the flu virus - which the World Health Organisation was wrongly predicting would turn into a full blown pandemic across Europe - said that Poland had considered buying an anti-flu vaccine but terms proposed by pharmaceutical companies were unacceptable.

Paul Flynn, who wrote the Council of Europe report, called the decision “an act of courage” and stressed that other countries spent millions of euro on vaccines.

Former head of the French Red Cross Prof. Marc Gentilini said that Poland can serve as an example of how to handle the threat of an A/H1N1 pandemic.

On Sat Apr 10, 2010 the Polish president and 96 others were killed in a jet crash. On board were President Lech Kaczynski, the national bank president, deputy foreign minister, army chaplain, head of the National Security Office, deputy parliament speaker, Olympic Committee head, civil rights commissioner and at least two presidential aides and three lawmakers, the Polish foreign ministry said. Kaczyinski’s wife, Maria, also died. Coincidence?

Obama has no problem bowing down to the Emperor of Japan and King of Saudi Arabia but he can’t acknowledge the American Flag. According to the United States Flag Code, the Pledge “should be rendered by standing at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. When not in uniform men should remove any non-religious headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart. Persons in uniform should remain silent, face the flag, and render the military salute.” The U.S. flag was replaced by the Obama logo on the tail of the plane that he used in his campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination. He won’t have the American flag on his website. Why? He’s telling us his allegiance is not with the United States. He’s Kenyan

Most people know that the Associated Press (AP) is one of the largest, internationally recognized, syndicated news services. In one report the AP published a report whereby they clearly stated that Barack Obama, a US Senator hopeful, was Kenyan born. When Obama was interviewed later he confirmed that he was indeed Kenyan born, not a natural born American.

In a syndicated AP report, published Sunday, June 27, 2004, by the Kenyan Standard Times, archived report available at, an AP reporter stated the following:

“Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.”

In October of 2004, during the ABC Chicago Affiliate’s broadcast of the Obama-Keyes debates, Obama openly admitted that he was not a natural born citizen. (C-Span aired the uncut version of the debates, which contained this exchange, in the second half of April, 2005) In this debate, between Obama and Keyes, Keyes faulted Obama for not being a “natural born citizen”, Obama replied, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency”, self-admitted that he was not eligible for the

Seeing that an AP reporter is too professional to submit a story which was not based on confirmed sources (ostensibly the Obama campaign in this case), the inference seems inescapable: Obama himself was putting out in 2004, that he was born in Kenya.

This AP story, was syndicated world-wide, so you should be able to find it in major newspapers, archived in libraries world-wide.

Sentinel Blog Radio broke the public news of the existence of this AP story on October 14, 2009. However, a professional investigator had uncovered this story months ago, and that certified and authenticated copies of this report, meeting Federal Rules of evidence, have already been prepared and archived at many locations nationwide. It should be noted that on January 8, 2006, the Honolulu Advertiser also reported that Barack Hussein Obama was born outside the United States.

So What?

If you’re going to be involved in government in the United States, citizenship is a must. To be a Senator or Representative, you must be a citizen of the United States. To be President, not only must you be a citizen, but you must also be natural-born.

Article Two of the United States Constitution

Clause 5: Qualifications for office

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

For persons born between December 24, 1952 and November 14, 1986, a person is a U.S. citizen if all of the following are true:

1. One of the person’s parents was a U.S. citizen when the person in question was born.
2. The citizen parent lived at least ten years in the United States before the child’s birth;
3. A minimum of 5 of these 10 years in the United States were after the citizen parent’s 14th birthday.

Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet the Constitutional requirements for the office of President of the United States of America as he is NOT a “natural born citizen” The 20th Amendment to the US Constitution states:

Section 3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.”.


On August 6, 1945, the world dramatically entered the atomic age: without either warning or precedent, an American plane dropped a single nuclear bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The explosion utterly destroyed more than four square miles of the city center. About 90,000 people were killed immediately; another 40,000 were injured, many of whom died in protracted agony from radiation sickness. Three days later, a second atomic strike on the city of Nagasaki killed some 37,000 people and injured another 43,000. Together the two bombs eventually killed an estimated 200,000 Japanese civilians.

Between the two bombings, Soviet Russia joined the United States in war against Japan. Under strong US prodding, Stalin broke his regime’s 1941 non-aggression treaty with Tokyo. On the same day that Nagasaki was destroyed, Soviet troops began pouring into Manchuria, overwhelming Japanese forces there. Although Soviet participation did little or nothing to change the military outcome of the war, Moscow benefitted enormously from joining the conflict.

In a broadcast from Tokyo the next day, August 10, the Japanese government announced its readiness to accept the joint American-British “unconditional surrender” declaration of Potsdam, “with the understanding that the said declaration does not compromise any demand which prejudices the prerogatives of His Majesty as a Sovereign Ruler.”

A day later came the American reply, which included these words: “From the moment of surrender the authority of the Emperor and the Japanese Government to rule the State shall be subject to the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers.” Finally, on August 14, the Japanese formally accepted the provisions of the Potsdam declaration, and a “cease fire” was announced. On September 2, Japanese envoys signed the instrument of surrender aboard the US battleship Missouri in Tokyo Bay.

Japan already had been defeated

Apart from the moral questions involved, were the atomic bombings militarily necessary? By any rational yardstick, they were not. Japan already had been defeated militarily by June 1945. Almost nothing was left of the once mighty Imperial Navy, and Japan’s air force had been all but totally destroyed. Against only token opposition, American war planes ranged at will over the country, and US bombers rained down devastation on her cities, steadily reducing them to rubble.

What was left of Japan’s factories and workshops struggled fitfully to turn out weapons and other goods from inadequate raw materials. (Oil supplies had not been available since April.) By July about a quarter of all the houses in Japan had been destroyed, and her transportation system was near collapse. Food had become so scarce that most Japanese were subsisting on a sub-starvation diet.

On the night of March 9-10, 1945, a wave of 300 American bombers struck Tokyo, killing 100,000 people. Dropping nearly 1,700 tons of bombs, the war planes ravaged much of the capital city, completely burning out 16 square miles and destroying a quarter of a million structures. A million residents were left homeless.

On May 23, eleven weeks later, came the greatest air raid of the Pacific War, when 520 giant B-29 “Superfortress” bombers unleashed 4,500 tons of incendiary bombs on the heart of the already battered Japanese capital. Generating gale-force winds, the exploding incendiaries obliterated Tokyo’s commercial center and railway yards, and consumed the Ginza entertainment district. Two days later, on May 25, a second strike of 502 “Superfortress” planes roared low over Tokyo, raining down some 4,000 tons of explosives. Together these two B-29 raids destroyed 56 square miles of the Japanese capital.

Even before the Hiroshima attack, American air force General Curtis LeMay boasted that American bombers were “driving them [Japanese] back to the stone age.” Henry H. (”Hap”) Arnold, commanding General of the Army air forces, declared in his 1949 memoirs: “It always appeared to us, atomic bomb or no atomic bomb, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This was confirmed by former Japanese prime minister Fumimaro Konoye, who said: “Fundamentally, the thing that brought about the determination to make peace was the prolonged bombing by the B-29s.”

Japan sought to end the war months before the US dropped the bomb

Months before the end of the war, Japan’s leaders recognized that defeat was inevitable. In April 1945 a new government headed by Kantaro Suzuki took office with the mission of ending the war. When Germany capitulated in early May, the Japanese understood that the British and Americans would now direct the full fury of their awesome military power exclusively against them.

American officials, having long since broken Japan’s secret codes, knew from intercepted messages that the country’s leaders were seeking to end the war on terms as favorable as possible. Details of these efforts were known from decoded secret communications between the Foreign Ministry in Tokyo and Japanese diplomats abroad.

In his 1965 study, Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam (pp. 107, 108), historian Gar Alperovitz writes:

Although Japanese peace feelers had been sent out as early as September 1944 (and China’s Chiang Kai-shek had been approached regarding surrender possibilities in December 1944), the real effort to end the war began in the spring of 1945. This effort stressed the role of the Soviet Union

In mid-April, 1945 the US Joint Intelligence Committee reported that Japanese leaders were looking for a way to modify the surrender terms to end the war. The State Department was convinced the Emperor was actively seeking a way to stop the fighting.

A Secret Memorandum

It was only after the war that the American public learned about Japan’s efforts to bring the conflict to an end. Chicago Tribune reporter Walter Trohan, for example, was obliged by wartime censorship to withhold for seven months one of the most important stories of the war.

In an article that finally appeared August 19, 1945, on the front pages of the Chicago Tribune and the Washington Times-Herald, Trohan revealed that on January 20, 1945, two days prior to his departure for the Yalta meeting with Stalin and Churchill, President Roosevelt received a 40-page memorandum from General Douglas MacArthur outlining five separate surrender overtures from high-level Japanese officials. (The complete text of Trohan’s article is in the Winter 1985-86 Journal, pp. 508-512.)

This memo showed that the Japanese were offering surrender terms virtually identical to the ones ultimately accepted by the Americans at the formal surrender ceremony on September 2 — that is, complete surrender of everything but the person of the Emperor. Specifically, the terms of these peace overtures included:

* Complete surrender of all Japanese forces and arms, at home, on island possessions, and in occupied countries.
* Occupation of Japan and its possessions by Allied troops under American direction.
* Japanese relinquishment of all territory seized during the war, as well as Manchuria, Korea and Taiwan.
* Regulation of Japanese industry to halt production of any weapons and other tools of war.
* Release of all prisoners of war and internees.
* Surrender of designated war criminals.

Is this memorandum authentic? It was supposedly leaked to Trohan by Admiral William D. Leahy, presidential Chief of Staff. (See: M. Rothbard in A. Goddard, ed., Harry Elmer Barnes: Learned Crusader [1968], pp. 327f.) Historian Harry Elmer Barnes has related (in “Hiroshima: Assault on a Beaten Foe,” National Review, May 10, 1958):

The authenticity of the Trohan article was never challenged by the White House or the State Department, and for very good reason. After General MacArthur returned from Korea in 1951, his neighbor in the Waldorf Towers, former President Herbert Hoover, took the Trohan article to General MacArthur and the latter confirmed its accuracy in every detail and without qualification.

Peace Overtures

In April and May 1945, Japan made three attempts through neutral Sweden and Portugal to bring the war to a peaceful end. On April 7, acting Foreign Minister Mamoru Shigemitsu met with Swedish ambassador Widon Bagge in Tokyo, asking him “to ascertain what peace terms the United States and Britain had in mind.” But he emphasized that unconditional surrender was unacceptable, and that “the Emperor must not be touched.” Bagge relayed the message to the United States, but Secretary of State Stettinius told the US Ambassador in Sweden to “show no interest or take any initiative in pursuit of the matter.” Similar Japanese peace signals through Portugal, on May 7, and again through Sweden, on the 10th, proved similarly fruitless.

By mid-June, six members of Japan’s Supreme War Council had secretly charged Foreign Minister Shigenori Togo with the task of approaching Soviet Russia’s leaders “with a view to terminating the war if possible by September.” On June 22 the Emperor called a meeting of the Supreme War Council, which included the Prime Minister, the Foreign Minister, and the leading military figures. “We have heard enough of this determination of yours to fight to the last soldiers,” said Emperor Hirohito. “We wish that you, leaders of Japan, will strive now to study the ways and the means to conclude the war. In doing so, try not to be bound by the decisions you have made in the past.”

By early July the US had intercepted messages from Togo to the Japanese ambassador in Moscow, Naotake Sato, showing that the Emperor himself was taking a personal hand in the peace effort, and had directed that the Soviet Union be asked to help end the war. US officials also knew that the key obstacle to ending the war was American insistence on “unconditional surrender,” a demand that precluded any negotiations. The Japanese were willing to accept nearly everything, except turning over their semi-divine Emperor. Heir of a 2,600-year-old dynasty, Hirohito was regarded by his people as a “living god” who personified the nation. (Until the August 15 radio broadcast of his surrender announcement, the Japanese people had never heard his voice.) Japanese particularly feared that the Americans would humiliate the Emperor, and even execute him as a war criminal.

On July 12, Hirohito summoned Fumimaro Konoye, who had served as prime minister in 1940-41. Explaining that “it will be necessary to terminate the war without delay,” the Emperor said that he wished Konoye to secure peace with the Americans and British through the Soviets. As Prince Konoye later recalled, the Emperor instructed him “to secure peace at any price, notwithstanding its severity.”

The next day, July 13, Foreign Minister Shigenori Togo wired ambassador Naotake Sato in Moscow: “See [Soviet foreign minister] Molotov before his departure for Potsdam … Convey His Majesty’s strong desire to secure a termination of the war … Unconditional surrender is the only obstacle to peace …”

On July 17, another intercepted Japanese message revealed that although Japan’s leaders felt that the unconditional surrender formula involved an unacceptable dishonor, they were convinced that “the demands of the times” made Soviet mediation to terminate the war absolutely essential. Further diplomatic messages indicated that the only condition asked by the Japanese was preservation of “our form of government.” The only “difficult point,” a July 25 message disclosed, “is the … formality of unconditional surrender.”

Summarizing the messages between Togo and Sato, US naval intelligence said that Japan’s leaders, “though still balking at the term unconditional surrender,” recognized that the war was lost, and had reached the point where they have “no objection to the restoration of peace on the basis of the [1941] Atlantic Charter.” These messages, said Assistant Secretary of the Navy Lewis Strauss, “indeed stipulated only that the integrity of the Japanese Royal Family be preserved.”

Navy Secretary James Forrestal termed the intercepted messages “real evidence of a Japanese desire to get out of the war.” “With the interception of these messages,” notes historian Alperovitz, “there could no longer be any real doubt as to the Japanese intentions; the maneuvers were overt and explicit and, most of all, official acts. Koichi Kido, Japan’s Lord Privy Seal and a close advisor to the Emperor, later affirmed: “Our decision to seek a way out of this war, was made in early June before any atomic bomb had been dropped and Russia had not entered the war. It was already our decision.”

In spite of this, on July 26 the leaders of the United States and Britain issued the Potsdam declaration, which included this grim ultimatum: “We call upon the government of Japan to proclaim now the unconditional surrender of all Japanese armed forces and to provide proper and adequate assurance of good faith in such action. The alternative for Japan is prompt and utter destruction.”

Commenting on this draconian either-or proclamation, British historian J.F.C. Fuller wrote: “Not a word was said about the Emperor, because it would be unacceptable to the propaganda-fed American masses.” (A Military History of the Western World [1987], p. 675.)

America’s leaders understood Japan’s desperate position: the Japanese were willing to end the war on any terms, as long as the Emperor was not molested. If the US leadership had not insisted on unconditional surrender — that is, if they had made clear a willingness to permit the Emperor to remain in place — the Japanese very likely would have surrendered immediately, thus saving many thousands of lives.

The sad irony is that, as it actually turned out, the American leaders decided anyway to retain the Emperor as a symbol of authority and continuity. They realized, correctly, that Hirohito was useful as a figurehead prop for their own occupation authority in postwar Japan.

No Justification for the US to drop the bomb

President Truman steadfastly defended his use of the atomic bomb, claiming that it “saved millions of lives” by bringing the war to a quick end. Justifying his decision, he went so far as to declare: “The world will note that the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, a military base. That was because we wished in this first attack to avoid, insofar as possible, the killing of civilians.”

This was a preposterous statement. In fact, almost all of the victims were civilians, and the United States Strategic Bombing Survey (issued in 1946) stated in its official report: “Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen as targets because of their concentration of activities and population.”

If the atomic bomb was dropped to impress the Japanese leaders with the immense destructive power of a new weapon, this could have been accomplished by deploying it on an isolated military base. It was not necessary to destroy a large city. And whatever the justification for the Hiroshima blast, it is much more difficult to defend the second bombing of Nagasaki.

All the same, most Americans accepted, and continue to accept, the official justifications for the bombings. Accustomed to crude propagandistic portrayals of the “Japs” as virtually subhuman beasts, most Americans in 1945 heartily welcomed any new weapon that would wipe out more of the detested Asians, and help avenge the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. For the young Americans who were fighting the Japanese in bitter combat, the attitude was “Thank God for the atom bomb.” Almost to a man, they were grateful for a weapon whose deployment seemed to end the war and thus allow them to return home.

After the July 1943 firestorm destruction of Hamburg, the mid-February 1945 holocaust of Dresden, and the fire-bombings of Tokyo and other Japanese cities, America’s leaders — as US Army General Leslie Groves later commented — “were generally inured to the mass killing of civilians.” For President Harry Truman, the killing of tens of thousands of Japanese civilians was simply not a consideration in his decision to use the atom bomb.

The World chastises the US for dropping the bomb

Amid the general clamor of enthusiasm, there were some who had grave misgivings. “We are the inheritors to the mantle of Genghis Khan,” wrote New York Times editorial writer Hanson Baldwin, “and of all those in history who have justified the use of utter ruthlessness in war.” Norman Thomas called Nagasaki “the greatest single atrocity of a very cruel war.” Joseph P. Kennedy, father of President JFK, was similarly appalled.

A leading voice of American Protestantism, Christian Century, strongly condemned the bombings. An editorial entitled “America’s Atomic Atrocity” in the issue of August 29, 1945, told readers:

The atomic bomb was used at a time when Japan’s navy was sunk, her air force virtually destroyed, her homeland surrounded, her supplies cut off, and our forces poised for the final stroke … Our leaders seem not to have weighed the moral considerations involved. No sooner was the bomb ready than it was rushed to the front and dropped on two helpless cities … The atomic bomb can fairly be said to have struck Christianity itself … The churches of America must dissociate themselves and their faith from this inhuman and reckless act of the American Government.

A leading American Catholic voice, Commonweal, took a similar view. Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the magazine editorialized, “are names for American guilt and shame.”

Pope Pius XII likewise condemned the bombings, expressing a view in keeping with the traditional Roman Catholic position that “every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and man.” The Vatican newspaper Osservatore Romano commented in its August 7, 1945, issue: “This war provides a catastrophic conclusion. Incredibly this destructive weapon remains as a temptation for posterity, which, we know by bitter experience, learns so little from history.”

Authoritative Voices of Dissent

American leaders who were in a position to know the facts did not believe, either at the time or later, that the atomic bombings were needed to end the war.

When he was informed in mid-July 1945 by Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson of the decision to use the atomic bomb, General Dwight Eisenhower was deeply troubled. He disclosed his strong reservations about using the new weapon in his 1963 memoir, The White House Years: Mandate for Change, 1953-1956 (pp. 312-313):

During his [Stimson’s] recitation of the relevant facts, I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of “face.

The Japanese were ready to surrender and it wasn’t necessary to hit them with that awful thing … I hated to see our country be the first to use such a weapon,” Eisenhower said in 1963.

Shortly after “V-J Day,” the end of the Pacific war, Brig. General Bonnie Fellers summed up in a memo for General MacArthur: “Neither the atomic bombing nor the entry of the Soviet Union into the war forced Japan’s unconditional surrender. She was defeated before either these events took place.”

Similarly, Admiral Leahy, Chief of Staff to presidents Roosevelt and Truman, later commented:

It is my opinion that the use of the barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan … The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons … My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children.

If the United States had been willing to wait, said Admiral Ernest King, US Chief of Naval Operations, “the effective naval blockade would, in the course of time, have starved the Japanese into submission through lack of oil, rice, medicines, and other essential materials.

Leo Szilard, a Hungarian-born scientist who played a major role in the development of the atomic bomb, argued against its use. “Japan was essentially defeated,” he said, and “it would be wrong to attack its cities with atomic bombs as if atomic bombs were simply another military weapon.” In a 1960 magazine article, Szilard wrote: “If the Germans had dropped atomic bombs on cities instead of us, we would have defined the dropping of atomic bombs on cities as a war crime, and we would have sentenced the Germans who were guilty of this crime to death at Nuremberg and hanged them.

July 23, 1946 Baker, Operation Crossroads, was the world’s fifth nuclear explosion, third nuclear test, and first underwater nuclear explosion. Detonated by the US and no one said a word about the US threat with such weapons of mass destruction

The US continues to make threats against Iran. Why is Iran being subjected to threats by the US? The answer is the same as the reason for the US attacking Iraq and Afghanistan - Oil. Iran has the oil that is part of the US plan for the Middle East. If Iran had no oil we would never hear a word from the US being opposed to Iran developing nuclear power plants. If Iran had no oil the US would be the first to sell Iran nuclear weaponry in the hopes that they would be allies of the US in their war against those who do have oil. The US knows there is no threat from Iran. They are fabricating a threat just as they did for Iraq. No threat no justification for launching an attack. Iran is no threat to the national security of the US or any other country. Iran has what the US wants but is too broke to pay for it.

In order to accuse Iran of being a threat we must first establish that Iran has been making threats against the US. Has any threats been made against the US? The answer is no. Secondly we have to confirm that Iran has nuclear weapons. Does Iran have nuclear weapons? The United Nations with headquarters in the US and the US intelligence agencies have investigated and have declared that they do not and furthermore Iran is years away from having the capability to make nuclear weapons. So if there is no threat and there are no nuclear weapons then how is the US justified in planning for and preparing for an attack on Iran? The answer is simple - the US does not have any justification whatsoever for an attack on Iran. To plan for and prepare for war against a foreign state is, according to US and International law, a war of aggression. Anyone who engages in or participates in the preparation of a war of aggression is guilty of crimes against peace. There are no exceptions to the rule of law. Once you begin making exceptions to the rule of law you no longer have a democracy. Once you start imposing you own selfish will upon your people you no longer have a democracy. Once you start ignoring and violating the rule of law you are a criminal - subject to the rule of law and punishable under the law. According to the United States Constitution once you cross the line and violate the supreme law of the land you are a criminal and must be removed from office through impeachment.

“The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States” who may only be impeached and removed for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The US Constitution recognizes and declares that the President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States can only be so if they follow the rule of law. Once you abuse your position and commit even a misdemeanor you are a criminal and are therefore no longer fit to be the President, Vice President, or civil officer. The Bill of Rights restricts Congress’ power by prohibiting it from making any law respecting establishment of religion and by prohibiting the federal government from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. In criminal cases, it requires indictment by grand jury for any capital or “infamous crime,” guarantees a speedy public trial with an impartial and local jury, and prohibits double jeopardy. In addition, the Bill of Rights states that “the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people,” and reserves all powers not granted to the Federal government to the citizenry or States.

Since we know that Iran has made no threat against the US and Iran has no nuclear weapons then who is the real enemy? The answer is clear. Those making the threats and those threatening to use nuclear weapons against another - the US and Israel. Sanctions should be imposed against the US and Israel for threatening to use nuclear weapons against a sovereign state. The UN Security Council should be meeting to draw up resolutions and charges of war of aggression, war crimes, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity against the US and Israel - not Iran. Both the US and Israel are committing crimes against peace. Both are planning for, preparing for and threatening another war of aggression. They are the ones making the threats. They are the ones with nuclear weapons and are threatening to use them in a preemptive strike. There has been no attack against Israel or the US by Iran. There are no indications that Iran is mobilizing its armed forces for an attack against Israel or the US. Iran does not have aircraft carriers off the coast of the United States. Iran did not attack Afghanistan or Iraq. Iran does not illegally occupy the foreign states of Afghanistan or Iraq. It is the US who attacked others. It is the US who is torturing the innocent people of Afghanistan and Iraq. It is the US who is attacking and killing civilians on a daily bases in Afghanistan and Iraq. It is the US who has used banned weapons against civilian towns and cities. It is the US who is threatening to use their nuclear arsenal against Iran.

Who has stockpiles of nuclear and biological weapons? Only one country in the World has ever used a nuclear weapon against another, not once, but twice. The Cold War had nothing to do with Iran, Iraq or North Korea. The Cold War, the use of nuclear weapons against civilian cities and stockpiles of both nuclear and biological weapons all have a common villain - the United States government. Logic, reasoning and judicial evidence is clear. The greatest nuclear threat is not from Iran but from those who have, those who have used them twice before and those who threaten to use.


The founding of the Zionist State, May 14, 1948, is in direct contradiction to the teachings of the Torah, which forbids the establishment of a Jewish State and commands Jews to remain in exile until released from that exile by God Himself without any human intervention. At which time all Nations of the world will live together in peace.

Two thousand years ago, at the time of the destruction of the holy Temple, the Jewish people were commanded by the Creator (kesubos 111a)

* Not to go up en masse to the land of Israel
* Not to rebel against the nations
* Not to in any way attempt to end the exile

Torah faithful Jews are to behave in a civil, honest and grateful manner towards their host nations throughout the world.

The Zionist intervention against God’s will by establishing the ‘State of Israel’, represents a direct rebellion against God and the Torah, a rebellion which has generated untold pain and suffering, to Jew and non-Jew alike.

On the anniversary of the founding of this heretical Zionist State, Torah true Jews mourn the attempt to transform Judaism from a religion into a secular entity and the attempt to uproot the Torah teachings. We mourn the sacrilege it has produced: desecration of the Sabbath, loss of modesty, and a litany of violations against many laws of our faith and Jewish teachings, amongst them the command of compassion for our fellow beings.

We mourn the subjugation, expulsion and horrific oppression of the Palestinian people, in a continuing chain of events, from the time of the foundation of the ‘State’, culminating in the recent tragic onslaught on Gaza. The list goes on and on…

On the tragic day of this anniversary, we fast and gather in Synagogues around the world, praying for a total, speedy and peaceful dismantlement of the heretical Zionist ‘State of Israel’, to be replaced by a free Palestine and a free Jerusalem entirely in accordance with the aspirations of the Palestinian people.

May we then merit that this year will be the year when the glory of the Almighty will be revealed over the whole world, when all nations will live in peace and join together in the service of one God, soon in our days.

1) What is “The People of Israel” ?

* The People of Israel have existed for thousands of years.
* They have their own particular, essential nature.
* The Torah is the source of their essential nature.
* Without Torah and Faith there is no People of Israel.
* Whoever denies the Torah and the Faith is no longer part of the People of Israel.
* The purpose of the People of Israel in this world is Divine Service.
* Their salvation is occupation in Divine Service.

2) What is Zionism?

* Zionism is a relatively new thing.
* It has only existed for a century.
* Zionism redefines the true essential nature of the People of Israel, and substitutes for it a completely contradictory and opposite character - a materialistic worldly nation.
* Their misfortune is lack of what other nations possess, i.e. a state and army.
* Their salvation is possession of a state and army etc.
* This is clearly spelled out in the circles of Zionist thought, and among the leaders of the Zionist State, that through changing the nature and character of the People of Israel and by changing their way of thinking they can set before the People of Israel “their salvation” — a state and an army.

The People of Israel oppose the so-called “State of Israel” for four reasons:

FIRST — The so-called “State of Israel” is diametrically opposed and completely contradictory to the true essence and foundation of the People of Israel, as is explained above. The only time that the People of Israel were permitted to have a state was two thousand years ago when the glory of the creator was upon us, and likewise in the future when the glory of the creator will once more be revealed, and the whole world will serve Him, then He Himself (without any human effort or force of arms) will grant us a kingdom founded on Divine Service. However, a worldly state, like those possessed by other peoples, is contradictory to the true essence of the People of Israel. Whoever calls this the salvation of Israel shows that he denies the essence of the People of Israel, and substitutes another nature, a worldly materialistic nature, and therefore sets before them, a worldly materialistic “salvation,” and the means of achieving this “salvation” is also worldly and materialistic i.e. to organize a land and army. However, the true salvation of the People of Israel is to draw close to the Creator. This is not done by organization and force of arms. Rather it is done by occupation to Torah and good deeds.

SECOND — Because of all of this and other reasons the Torah forbids us to end the exile and establish a state and army until the Holy One, blessed He, in His Glory and Essence will redeem us. This is forbidden even if the state is conducted according to the law of the Torah because arising from the exile itself is forbidden, and we are required to remain under the rule of the nations of the world, as is explained in the book VAYOEL MOSHE. If we transgress this injunction, He will bring upon us (may we be spared) terrible punishment.

THIRD — Aside from arising from exile, all the deeds of the Zionists are diametrically opposed to the Faith and the Torah. Because the foundation of the Faith and Torah of Israel is that the Torah was revealed from heaven, and there is reward for those who obey it and punishment for those who transgress it. The entire People of Israel is required to obey the Torah, and whoever doesn’t want to, ceases to be part of the congregation of Israel.

FOURTH — Aside from the fact that they themselves do not obey the Torah they do everything they can to prevent anyone they get under their power from fulfilling the commands of the Torah, the claims to freedom of religion are lies. They fight with all of their strength to destroy the Faith of Israel.

The Zionists claim that they are the saviors of Israel, but this is refuted by twelve things:

FIRST — If one contemplates the two thousand years of our exile, take any hundred years even the hardest, one will not find as much suffering, bloodshed, and catastrophes for the People of Israel in the period of the Zionists, and it is known that most of the suffering of this century was caused by the Zionists, as our Rabbis warned us would be the case.

SECOND — It is openly stated in books written by the founders of Zionism that the means by which they planned to establish a state was by instigating anti-Semitism, and undermining the security of the Jews in all the lands of the world, until they would be forced to flee to their state. And thus they did - They intentionally infuriated the German people and fanned the flames of Nazi hatred, and they helped the Nazis, with trickery and deceit, to take whole Jewish communities off to the concentration camps, and the Zionists themselves admit this. (See the books Perfidy, Min Hameitzor, etc.). The Zionists continue to practice this strategy today. They incite anti-Semitism and then they present themselves as the “saviors”. Here are two replies given by Leaders of the Zionists during World War II, when they were asked for money to help ransom Jews from the Nazis. Greenbaum said “One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland.”
Weitzman said, “The most important part of the Jewish people is already in the land (of Israel) and those who are left, are unimportant”.

THIRD — We see that most of world Jewry lives in security and under good physical conditions, and have no desire to go live in the Zionist State. Whereas many people have left the Zionist State to live under better conditions in other lands.

FOURTH — The Zionists make a great deal of propaganda to induce people to immigrate to their state. If their state is so beneficial why do they have to make so much propaganda.

FIFTH — Because nobody wants the Zionists to “save” them. The only way they can get immigrants is by promising poor people material benefits, and even then very few people respond.

SIXTH — The Zionist State is always threatened by the dangers of war. Whereas the rest of world Jewry live in peace and security, (Except in a few places where the Zionists have undermined their security and fanned the flames of hatred)

SEVENTH — The Zionist State could not continue to exist without economic support from Jews living outside of the Zionist State.

EIGHTH — The Zionist State is on the verge of economic collapse, and their money is nearly worthless.

NINTH — The Zionist State persecute all Jews who are loyal to their Faith.

TENTH — They start wars that endanger the Jewish People, for the sake of their own political interests.

ELEVENTH - According to the Torah the path of safety is following ways of peace not starting fights with other nations, as the Zionists do.

TWELFTH — Even if the Zionists could and would provide physical security it would be at the expense of our Faith and Our Torah the true People of Israel prefer death rather than life at such a cost.

It is therefore clear that Zionism is not the savior of the people of Israel. Rather it is their greatest misfortune. Even though there are some observant Jews and rabbis, who approve of the Zionists, this is not the opinion of the Torah. The Zionists have enough control over the American news media to make sure that only their side of the story is heard. They make it look like all Jewry and their rabbis are Zionists, but this is false propaganda.

The most important Rabbis and the majority of religious Jewry are opposed to Zionism, but their voice is not heard because of Zionist control of American news media. The Zionists terrorize everyone who speaks out against them. That part of the Jewish masses which is fooled by Zionist propaganda puts pressure on their Rabbis not to speak out.

Between the terror and the pressure of the masses most of the Rabbis are prevented from speaking out.

Three testimonies of the true opinion of the Torah.

1) In the past two thousand years of the dangers and sufferings of exile not once did any of the Sages of Israel suggest that we make a state to protect ourselves. In every generation we had thousands of Sages well versed in the Torah.

2) We have thousands of legal work of Torah law that have been handed down to us by the Sages of all generations. Not once do we see a word suggesting the establishment of a state. What we do find is warnings against it.

3) The founders of Zionism were all atheists who denied the Torah. All the Torah Sages of that time opposed them and opposed Zionism, saying that Zionism would lead only to destruction.

However the true People of Israel will never change their nature or give up their Faith because of the strength the Creator gives them. Zionism is a foreign growth in the body of the Jewish People. The end will be that it will rid itself of this foreign growth and remain pure. Zionism has overcome the Jewish people by force, fraud and terror, but none of this will help them because the truth will always remain with the help of the Creator.

Zionism will not replace the Jewish People. The Jewish People will remain strong in their faith and the Zionist State will cease to exist. It is therefore, the Jewish people’s demand that the State that calls itself ISRAEL, should cease to exist. Since this won’t be done, the Jewish people demand that Zionists cease to call themselves “Israel”, because their entire being is in complete opposition to the true People of Israel. The true People of Israel deny Zionists permission to call themselves by that name. The Zionist leaders have no right to set themselves up as the representatives and spokesmen of the true People of ISRAEL.

Since we know they will not fulfill this demand either we feel that at least we cry out the truth. The truth will always remain the truth. By no means or force can the truth be changed. Even if all the world would say that one and one is three, the truth will remain that one and one is two.

Let the truth be declared. The use of the name “ISRAEL” by that State is a complete falsification. The People of Israel have nothing to do with that State. Zionism and its State have no share and no part in the true ISRAEL.