Strict Standards: Only variables should be passed by reference in /home/frene605/public_html/presscore.ca/nbg/fp-includes/core/core.fpdb.class.php on line 302
nb Gazette

There will be no new reports for awhile. nbgazette is in the process of moving. We apologize for the inconvenience. We look forward to providing an in dept investigative view of today’s news in the coming month. In the meantime if you would like to donate so that the work on reporting the news can restart as soon as possible please feel free to donate whatever amount you wish. Click on the Make a Donation link to the right. Than you for your patronage. We look forward to providing more in depth investigative reports in the very near future.

bio-weapon.jpg

US government agency people are secretly warning their families and friends to refuse to take a vaccine that Obama is preparing for this fall. The governments of the world are preparing to vaccinate the entire populace? According to Reuters 4.9 billion vaccinations against the supposed swine flu could be ready shortly. Documents have been leaked that suggest the CDC is preparing to have a Day of Planning for an H1N1 Vaccination Campaign. The WHO” is also now saying that because of the outbreak in Japan they may be forced to declare a level 6 pandemic. The Swine flu is no longer a threat but will be made a threat this fall with the mandatory vaccinations of the entire World population. The government of the US and other major countries are going ahead with their plan to mass murder millions of people by infecting healthy people with their biological weapon called H1N1 virus. The reason for this mass murder is that the corporate elite have decided that the Earth can no longer sustain its population. Instead of investing in space exploration, to colonize other life sustaining planets, they have decided it is much cheaper to reduce the population of the Earth by way of mass murder - a genocide of the human race, a holocaust.

US president Obama will meet with the anti-Christian Pope (Vicar of Christ is the name taken by all past Popes and it literally translates to be in place of Christ or anti-Christ) at the Vatican to discuss this plan. The Roman Empire that lives to this day within the Vatican State could not defeat the Jews or the Christians so they fully support the US help in releasing the US made H1N1 biological weapon that will kill millions if the people follow their unlawful order to be vaccinated against a flu that can easily be defeated by the body’s own immune system. The vaccine has an added agent that is anti-fever. It has been added because a fever will kill all known viral infections including man made viruses. No viral influenza can survive a high fever, the body’s natural killer of all viral infections. It has been proven time and again that a fever is not a symptom of a viral infection but the body’s own defense. It is the intent of the governments to prevent a fever so that millions will die from their vaccines, not the influenza itself.

People have died as a result of the treatments or vaccines not the actual disease or viral infection. The Spanish flu that was said to have resulted in the deaths of millions World wide did not in fact kill millions, it is what millions of people took that killed millions, and that was Aspirin. Even in the last swine flu outbreak in the late 70s the swine flu only killed one person. He died because he was patient zero. He was exposed to a lethal dose of the US made biological weapon they called swine flu. The other people who died did not die because of the swine flu but from the administered antidote.

If you and your family want to live and you are healthy DO NOT take the vaccine. Even if they make it law, making it mandatory, do not get injected with their biological weapons grade H1N1, your life and the life of your family depends on you refusing to be infected with their biological weapon called H1N1. If they do make it mandatory it is not legal. No law can ever be passed making it legal for the government to mass murder its population. No physician can administer any treatment or even give advise that will cause you harm. Medical malpractice is professional negligence by act or omission by a health care provider in which care provided deviates from accepted standards of practice in the medical community and causes injury or death to the patient.

Six of the values that commonly apply to medical ethics are:

* Autonomy - the patient has the right to refuse or choose their treatment. (Voluntas aegroti suprema lex.)
* Beneficence - a practitioner should act in the best interest of the patient. (Salus aegroti suprema lex.)
* Non-maleficence - “first, do no harm” (primum non nocere).
* Justice - concerns the distribution of scarce health resources, and the decision of who gets what treatment (fairness and equality).
* Dignity - the patient (and the person treating the patient) have the right to dignity.
* Truthfulness and honesty - the concept of informed consent has increased in importance since the historical events of the Doctors’ Trial of the Nuremberg trials and Tuskegee Syphilis Study.

If the government does pass an unlawful law making it mandatory for everyone to be vaccinated they are conspiring to commit mass murder. Whether it be one murder or millions of murders they are murderers. There is not statue of limitation for murder. There is no escaping the crime of murder. You have the right to defend yourself. You have a right to choose. You have a right to be protected. You have the right to use lethal force in self-defense. If the end result of an attack is death you have the right to defend yourself and your family from harm and death. You have all these rights and you most certainly have the right to refuse to be infected and murdered.

Mass murder is the act of murdering a large number of people, typically at the same time or over a relatively short period of time. Mass murder may be committed by individuals or organizations. Mass murder is also defined to be intentional and indiscriminate murder of large number of people by government agents. Examples are shooting of unarmed protestors, carpet bombing of cities, lobbing of grenades into prison cells and random execution of civilians. The term may refer to spree killers, who stage a single assault on their victims. The largest mass killings in history have been attempts to exterminate entire groups or communities of people, often on the basis of ethnicity or religion. Some of these mass murders have been found to be genocides and others to be crimes against humanity.

Actions in which the state caused the death of large numbers of people, which political scientist R. J. Rummel calls “democide,” may include man-made disasters caused by the state including unwarranted vaccinations of the entire population. According to Rummel, genocide has three different meanings. The ordinary meaning is murder by government of people due to their national, ethnic, racial, or religious group membership. The legal meaning of genocide refers to the international treaty, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This also includes nonlethal acts that in the end eliminate the group, such as preventing births or forcibly transferring children out of the group to another group. A generalized meaning of genocide is similar to the ordinary meaning but also includes government killings of political opponents or otherwise intentional murder. In order to avoid confusion over which meaning is intended, Rummel created the term democide for the third meaning. Rummel defines democide as “The murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder”. For example, government-sponsored killings for political reasons would be considered democide. Democide can also include deaths arising from “intentionally or knowingly reckless and depraved disregard for life”

independence_day.jpg

Millions of ordinary Americans are planning on protesting against Barack (Barry) Obama policies in a massive July 4th Independence Day protest in cities across the United States. In stark contrast to Martin Luther King who drew millions of supporters Barry Obama will have to face millions of protesters on July 4th. This is clearly a sign of the magnitude of discontent that the US people have for Barry Obama. From broken promises, to money laundering, to rising taxes to pay bonuses and gift to Obama’s presidential campaign donors and supporters to unnecessary Big government to abuse of power and authority and Obama illegally seizing control of big business .

The Tax Day nationwide “tea party” demonstrations on April 15, 2009 to protest massive government spending increases and rising taxes received relatively little coverage from the national news media.

The Obama government dismissed them as the work of right-wing advocacy organizations in Washington, and the events were so dispersed - most of them in small cities and towns - that no one could be sure how many actually had turned out to attend them.

In fact, the events were organized locally by nonactivists who had never done anything like this before. As many as a million people in nearly 600 localities - from Bakersfield, Calif., to Atlanta - turned out to vent their anger over the Obama’s massive spending levels. A rally-by-rally account of the people who attended the events suggests that turnout could have been much higher.

The seemingly spontaneous April 15 protests have since grown into a more muscular movement of patriotic Americans concerned that the huge and escalating cost of government under President Obama and his party threatens to plunge the country into paralyzing levels of debt and taxes that will rob them of their economic freedoms.

What will Obama do this time to silence the dissent? Will he release a new more deadly strain of swine flu like he did the day after the April 15, 2009 Tax Day Tea Party Revolt? Congressmen and women from both parties have already made public that Obama intends on transforming the US from a democratic state governed by the people to a despotic rule fascist government with Obama as the new self-imposed head of state. A person who would lie about his name and place of birth cannot be trusted. Law enforcement agents within the US government have found that Obama’s legal name is Barry not Barack. They have found that he is not and never was eligible to be president of the United States as he has a dual citizenship - illegal under US law because he has sworn allegiance to another state. They have uncovered that Obama submitted a forged live birth document to the US Congress as the one he submitted has the name Barack Obama instead of his legal and birth name of Barry Obama.

Obama is a Trojan horse. He illegally assumed the presidency for the sole purpose of destroying the US. In the short time he has been in office he has accumulated more debt than all the presidents before him. He is the first and only president to suspend parts of the United States Constitution - the Supreme law of the United States. He has illegally suspended the people’s 6th Amendment and he will soon suspend their 2nd Amendment. Obama is the number one enemy of the United States and the people plan on taking back their Independence on July 4th 2009.

On July 4, 2009 show the World that Obama doesn’t represent the United States people. Reclaim your Independence and Rights guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution. Show Obama dictators are not welcomed in the United States of America.

First Barack Obama’s candidacy and now his presidency have been buttressed by a malleable media and by supporters promoting illegitimate, agenda-driven “science,” both of which have their antecedents in the rise to and consolidation of power of Josef Stalin in Russia nearly a century ago. The parallels between Stalin’s and Obama’s regimes, to say nothing of the potential disastrous similarities in outcomes, are striking.

During the late 1920s and early ’30s, the New York Times’ Walter S. Duranty would misrepresent Stalin and Soviet Communism to the world in much the same way the Times and other sympathetic media outlets misrepresented who Barack Obama was during the 2008 presidential campaign and continue to do now that he has assumed office. While, unlike the Washington Post’s Eli Zaslow, Duranty was apparently not directly acquainted with Russian dictator Josef Stalin’s “glistening pectorals,” the Times’ man in Moscow nonetheless managed to describe the Russian dictator’s messianic qualities quite as capably as Zaslow and the other sycophants who pass for journalists today have done Obama’s.

Duranty characterized Stalin as one of history’s great leaders, those whom God chooses “to lead mankind” and “with whom he [God] speaks directly.” Stalin was for Duranty a “remote, reticent lord” and “the incarnate Superman of Nietzsche.” In characterizing Stalin’s rule, Duranty asserted that “Stalinism re-established the semi-divine, supreme autocracy of the imperial idea and . . . placed itself on the Kremlin throne as a ruler whose lightest word is all in all and whose frown spells death.” (New York Times, June 13, 1931)

It’s difficult to ignore the similarities between Duranty’s gushing about Stalin and that of the contemporary media’s about Obama, not to mention that Obama’s “frown,” having been recently directed at Chrysler and GM, may ultimately spell “death” for those once robustly capitalist companies, said frown having already successfully reduced their executives to little more than toadies nodding amiable assent to being taken over by the U.S. Government.

In 1928, Stalin’s first Five-Year Plan was put into effect, and in the years following, Duranty’s writings about Soviet Russia praised and promoted this “physical expression of all that is meant by ‘Stalinism,’” the mood of his pieces often exhibiting a tingliness worthy of MSNBC’s Chris Matthews. Perhaps prefiguring the Obama administration’s vagueness regarding the particulars of its policies, Duranty insisted that “detailed figures [about Stalin’s initial Five-Year Plan] are confusing and do not matter much as compared with the ‘tempo.’” Duranty’s piece explains that it was agreed by the Bolshevik leadership that an end must be put to the “accumulation of capital” and the ability to “compete unfairly with state industry,” two things that had been the backbone of the successful New Economic Program (NEP) implemented earlier by Stalin’s predecessor, Vladimir Lenin. (NYT, June 15, 1931) Obama’s penchant for engineering scenarios in which many private American companies and banks will not be able to “compete fairly” with their U.S. Government-owned counterparts smells very much like what Stalin was reaching for early in his tenure.

Stalin, as Obama is in the process of doing today, enlisted questionable science in the service of his political agenda, and it’s not out of the question that the results of Obama’s efforts on this front will bring about the contemporary equivalent in America of the human tragedy the Soviet dictator’s policies wrought for the Russian people. From the late 1920s through the 1940s, as Stalin carried out his murderous consolidation of power in the Soviet Union, Trofim Denisovich (T. D.) Lysenko emerged as the leading proponent of a scientific position that would become the basis of Stalin’s disastrous collectivization of agricultural production in the Soviet Union.

Lysenko’s muddy and unsupported theory of plant development — which, among other things, held incorrectly that environment, and not genetics, was the critical factor in determining the length of time it would take a specific type of plant to reach maturity — was applied widely in the Soviet Union during the first Five Year Plan in an attempt to improve the productivity of then recently collectivized Ukrainian farms. The resulting disaster saw millions of kulaks (as the group of peasants singled out in Stalin’s brutal agricultural collectivization strategy was called) murdered, imprisoned, or dead of starvation. An additional five million Soviet citizens perished of starvation because of the precipitous plunge in agricultural production that resulted from the combination of Stalin’s application of Lysenko’s theories and his liquidation of the kulaks, who were the best and most productive farmers in the Soviet Union. Stalin publicly stated that his aim was “the elimination of the kulaks,” and Lysenko was a willing accomplice, lending the use of his illegitimate theories to Stalin’s murderous cause.

Al Gore is the 21st-century energy-industry equivalent of T. D. Lysenko. Like Lysenko, Gore bases his recommendation for drastic changes in the way we conduct business on pseudo-science that has absolutely no foundation in legitimate and dispassionate scientific inquiry. We can hope — there’s that pesky “hope and change” again — that the results of Obama’s Gore-friendly energy policies will not be a dire loss of American lives similar to that resulting from Stalin’s agricultural policies. But it can be argued that the economic hardships for Americans created by energy-policy laws based on illegitimate science and now in the process of being enacted — like the “stimulus” bill likely to be passed without so much as having been read by our federal legislators — will rival the existential hardships of Stalin’s and Lysenko’s victims. The bottom line is that, like the policies implemented on the basis of Lysenko’s theories, the Obama administration’s cap-and-trade legislation is designed to correct a condition — the newly renamed “climate catastrophe” — that simply does not exist.

With a suppression of debate worthy of that of the first Russian Communist dictator, Barack Obama’s administration is rapidly moving toward a consolidation of power that will put our President in league with the likes of Hugo Chavez and at least one Arab sheik, contemporaries with whom Obama has smilingly consorted and to whom he’s bowed down. It’s time for us to take the lessons of history seriously, and to recognize that we’re in the clutches of an administration whose bending of the law and science to its own ends parallels those of one of the most murderous tyrants this planet has ever known, a despot in whose footsteps Barack Obama seems to be hellbent on following.

BARRY_SOETORO.jpg
Barry Soetoro pretends to be Barack Hussein Obama.

A growing number of US people are challenging Barack Hussein Obama’s right to be president of the United States of America. They fear that they have been grossly deceived by Obama. Obama to this day refuses to release to the public an official legal copy of his birth certificate. He refuses because evidence is surfacing that his birth certificate that he presented to Congress as proof of eligibility could very well be a fake. There is no live birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii because his birth first name was Barry. Numerous official government documents records Obama’s name as Barry Soetoro. School registries shows the registration of Barack Obama under the name Barry Soetoro. During his Occidental College days he is registered as Barry Soetoro. An entry in the journal of the California assembly in reference to grants given to foreign exchange students states Obama as Barry Soetoro from Indonesia. The first name of a child is always the same from birth. If throughout his childhood Obama went by the first name of Barry then legally his birth name would have to be Barry. In order to register any child for school an official birth certificate must be presented. To receive a government grant proof of citizenship and birth must also be submitted. All of the evidence is stating that Barack Obama’s legal first name is Barry not Barrack. There seems to be no record of Obama legally changing his first name from Barry to Barack. Barack is an assumed name, one he adopted during his college days.

A 2007 Associated Press photograph, suppressed until now, showed the school register of the child who is today known as Barack Hussein Obama but was officially listed then as Barry Soetoro, whose citizenship was listed as “Indonesian” and whose religion was listed as “Islam.” The visual evidence starkly contradicts the Obama campaign’s claim that he was not a Muslim and confirms that he is a national of at least one other country.

“Obama’s mother, divorced from Obama’s father, married a man from Indonesia named Lolo Soetoro, and the family relocated to the country from 1967-71. At first, Obama attended the Catholic school, Fransiskus Assisis, where documents showed he enrolled as a Muslim, the religion of his stepfather. The document required that each student choose one of five state-sanctioned religions when registering — Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Catholic or Protestant. Gibbs said he wasn’t sure why the document had Obama listed as a Muslim.”

Gibbs may not have been sure, but it appears that the Obama campaign made sure that this image did not see the light of day, because the photographic listing of the candidate, even as a child, as an Indonesian whose religion was Islam was worth, well, a thousand words. “Senator Obama has never been a Muslim,” Gibbs said in the article. “As a six-year-old in Catholic school, he studied the catechism.”

That may be Gibbs’ assertion, but evidence from grown-up school chums of little Barry Soetoro indicates that he studied, and excelled in, the teachings of the Koran in the original Arabic and could recite the Shehada, the Islamic article of faith, by heart, and with a decent tune, according to the New York Times roving columnist Nicholas Kristof, to whom “Obama” remarked that the sound of the Muslim call to prayer was one of the world’s most beautiful sounds.

The AP article quoted Iis Darmawan, 63, Obama’s kindergarten teacher, who “remembers him as an exceptionally tall and curly haired child who quickly picked up the local language and had sharp math skills. ‘He wrote an essay titled, “I Want To Become President,”‘ the teacher said.” She didn’t indicate which country he wanted to become president of.

The AP caption reads: “This registration document, made available on Jan. 24, 2007, by the Fransiskus Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia, shows the registration of Barack Obama under the name Barry Soetoro into the Catholic school made by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro. The document lists Barry Soetoro as a Indonesian citizen, born on August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, and shows his Muslim step-father listed the boy’s religion as Islam. (AP Photo/ Tatan Syuflana)” Syuflana is a well-known and frequently published photographer, specializing in Indonesia.

The most damaging revelation in the AP photo may turn out to be the listing of his name as Barry Soetoro. It has been reported that he used the name Barack Hussein Obama and failed to mention Barry Soetoro when asked to provide any former names. (He reportedly also did not respond honestly when answering negatively to a question concerning illegal drug use, which he has since admitted.) It is believed that failure to report his previous name is not an isolated instance, and may have contributed to the perceived need to manufacture a forged birth certificate listing Obama’s preferred identity as if it were present from the start.

The listing of Barry Soetoro as a Muslim contradicts what appears on his campaign’s Fight the Smears website, where he says that “I have never been a Muslim.” In a private meeting with Jewish leaders in February, Obama emphatically re-stated the claim, but with a bit of a twist, declaring: “I am not, nor have I ever been, a Muslim (especially an anti-American one).”

No one is claiming, here, that Obama is anti-American. But the image of his school registration doesn’t lie, and indicates clearly that he was registered as a Muslim, and thus, despite the claim of his spokesman, he didn’t study the catechism. Barry Soetoro studied the Koran.

Evidence that Obama is an imposter

There is a biography of Barry Soetoro ’s Occidental College days. It states that when Barry Soetoro was 18-19 he attended school as BARRY SOETORO. And it wasn’t until he met a girl by the name of REGINA who was the first to start calling him Barack.

It was then that Obama changed his first name from Barry to Barrack. “She accepted Obama the way he was. He did not have to put on an act for her. She was one of the first to call him Barack instead of Barry. She said Barack was a beautiful name.”

While being sworn as an attorney in the State of Illinois, Mr Obama had to provide his personal information under oath. He was asked, if he had any other names, he responded none. In reality, he used the name Barry Soetoro. There was an entry in the journal of the California assembly in reference to grants given to foreign exchange students, one Soetoro from Indonesia. Mr. Soetoro/Obama clearly defrauded the State Bar of Illinois and perjured himself while concealing his identity. Anybody else would’ve been disbarred for this and the matter would’ve been forwarded to the district attorney for prosecution for perjury and fraud, however nothing was done to Mr. Obama. More importantly, why did he conceal his identity?

Wherether or not he legally changed his name is still to be determined. If he didn’t legally have his name changed then the birth certificate he passed to Congress is a fake as his name at birth was Barry Soetoro.

Article II of the Constitution does not allow for dual-citizenship or allegiance to another country.

In addition to the above, Obama would have been a U.S. citizen, 8 USC 1481(a)(2) provides loss of nationality by native born citizens upon “taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state … after having attained the age of eighteen years,” in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1401(a)(1). Simply put, since Indonesia did not allow for dual citizenship, if Obama got that passport in 1981, when he was 20 years old, he effectively renounced any U.S. citizenship he may have had.

“So, if the experts are right, Obama forged a Certification of Live Birth to fool America. In addition to the automatic Indonesian citizenship granted to a child acknowledged as a “son” by an Indonesian male citizen, and the Indonesian citizenship listed in Obama’s school records, Obama then traveled to a place where Americans weren’t allowed to go, but citizens of Indonesia were. If he obtained an Indonesian passport on his trip in 1981, he effectively renounced any American citizenship he may have had and cannot serve as president (or “rule” as president, as members of his campaign have stated).