Strict Standards: Only variables should be passed by reference in /home/preswquq/public_html/nbg/fp-includes/core/core.fpdb.class.php on line 302

There will be no new reports for awhile. nbgazette is in the process of moving. We apologize for the inconvenience. We look forward to providing an in dept investigative view of today’s news in the coming month. In the meantime if you would like to donate so that the work on reporting the news can restart as soon as possible please feel free to donate whatever amount you wish. Click on the Make a Donation link to the right. Than you for your patronage. We look forward to providing more in depth investigative reports in the very near future.


US government agency people are secretly warning their families and friends to refuse to take a vaccine that Obama is preparing for this fall. The governments of the world are preparing to vaccinate the entire populace? According to Reuters 4.9 billion vaccinations against the supposed swine flu could be ready shortly. Documents have been leaked that suggest the CDC is preparing to have a Day of Planning for an H1N1 Vaccination Campaign. The WHO” is also now saying that because of the outbreak in Japan they may be forced to declare a level 6 pandemic. The Swine flu is no longer a threat but will be made a threat this fall with the mandatory vaccinations of the entire World population. The government of the US and other major countries are going ahead with their plan to mass murder millions of people by infecting healthy people with their biological weapon called H1N1 virus. The reason for this mass murder is that the corporate elite have decided that the Earth can no longer sustain its population. Instead of investing in space exploration, to colonize other life sustaining planets, they have decided it is much cheaper to reduce the population of the Earth by way of mass murder - a genocide of the human race, a holocaust.

US president Obama will meet with the anti-Christian Pope (Vicar of Christ is the name taken by all past Popes and it literally translates to be in place of Christ or anti-Christ) at the Vatican to discuss this plan. The Roman Empire that lives to this day within the Vatican State could not defeat the Jews or the Christians so they fully support the US help in releasing the US made H1N1 biological weapon that will kill millions if the people follow their unlawful order to be vaccinated against a flu that can easily be defeated by the body’s own immune system. The vaccine has an added agent that is anti-fever. It has been added because a fever will kill all known viral infections including man made viruses. No viral influenza can survive a high fever, the body’s natural killer of all viral infections. It has been proven time and again that a fever is not a symptom of a viral infection but the body’s own defense. It is the intent of the governments to prevent a fever so that millions will die from their vaccines, not the influenza itself.

People have died as a result of the treatments or vaccines not the actual disease or viral infection. The Spanish flu that was said to have resulted in the deaths of millions World wide did not in fact kill millions, it is what millions of people took that killed millions, and that was Aspirin. Even in the last swine flu outbreak in the late 70s the swine flu only killed one person. He died because he was patient zero. He was exposed to a lethal dose of the US made biological weapon they called swine flu. The other people who died did not die because of the swine flu but from the administered antidote.

If you and your family want to live and you are healthy DO NOT take the vaccine. Even if they make it law, making it mandatory, do not get injected with their biological weapons grade H1N1, your life and the life of your family depends on you refusing to be infected with their biological weapon called H1N1. If they do make it mandatory it is not legal. No law can ever be passed making it legal for the government to mass murder its population. No physician can administer any treatment or even give advise that will cause you harm. Medical malpractice is professional negligence by act or omission by a health care provider in which care provided deviates from accepted standards of practice in the medical community and causes injury or death to the patient.

Six of the values that commonly apply to medical ethics are:

* Autonomy - the patient has the right to refuse or choose their treatment. (Voluntas aegroti suprema lex.)
* Beneficence - a practitioner should act in the best interest of the patient. (Salus aegroti suprema lex.)
* Non-maleficence - “first, do no harm” (primum non nocere).
* Justice - concerns the distribution of scarce health resources, and the decision of who gets what treatment (fairness and equality).
* Dignity - the patient (and the person treating the patient) have the right to dignity.
* Truthfulness and honesty - the concept of informed consent has increased in importance since the historical events of the Doctors’ Trial of the Nuremberg trials and Tuskegee Syphilis Study.

If the government does pass an unlawful law making it mandatory for everyone to be vaccinated they are conspiring to commit mass murder. Whether it be one murder or millions of murders they are murderers. There is not statue of limitation for murder. There is no escaping the crime of murder. You have the right to defend yourself. You have a right to choose. You have a right to be protected. You have the right to use lethal force in self-defense. If the end result of an attack is death you have the right to defend yourself and your family from harm and death. You have all these rights and you most certainly have the right to refuse to be infected and murdered.

Mass murder is the act of murdering a large number of people, typically at the same time or over a relatively short period of time. Mass murder may be committed by individuals or organizations. Mass murder is also defined to be intentional and indiscriminate murder of large number of people by government agents. Examples are shooting of unarmed protestors, carpet bombing of cities, lobbing of grenades into prison cells and random execution of civilians. The term may refer to spree killers, who stage a single assault on their victims. The largest mass killings in history have been attempts to exterminate entire groups or communities of people, often on the basis of ethnicity or religion. Some of these mass murders have been found to be genocides and others to be crimes against humanity.

Actions in which the state caused the death of large numbers of people, which political scientist R. J. Rummel calls “democide,” may include man-made disasters caused by the state including unwarranted vaccinations of the entire population. According to Rummel, genocide has three different meanings. The ordinary meaning is murder by government of people due to their national, ethnic, racial, or religious group membership. The legal meaning of genocide refers to the international treaty, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This also includes nonlethal acts that in the end eliminate the group, such as preventing births or forcibly transferring children out of the group to another group. A generalized meaning of genocide is similar to the ordinary meaning but also includes government killings of political opponents or otherwise intentional murder. In order to avoid confusion over which meaning is intended, Rummel created the term democide for the third meaning. Rummel defines democide as “The murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder”. For example, government-sponsored killings for political reasons would be considered democide. Democide can also include deaths arising from “intentionally or knowingly reckless and depraved disregard for life”


Millions of ordinary Americans are planning on protesting against Barack (Barry) Obama policies in a massive July 4th Independence Day protest in cities across the United States. In stark contrast to Martin Luther King who drew millions of supporters Barry Obama will have to face millions of protesters on July 4th. This is clearly a sign of the magnitude of discontent that the US people have for Barry Obama. From broken promises, to money laundering, to rising taxes to pay bonuses and gift to Obama’s presidential campaign donors and supporters to unnecessary Big government to abuse of power and authority and Obama illegally seizing control of big business .

The Tax Day nationwide “tea party” demonstrations on April 15, 2009 to protest massive government spending increases and rising taxes received relatively little coverage from the national news media.

The Obama government dismissed them as the work of right-wing advocacy organizations in Washington, and the events were so dispersed - most of them in small cities and towns - that no one could be sure how many actually had turned out to attend them.

In fact, the events were organized locally by nonactivists who had never done anything like this before. As many as a million people in nearly 600 localities - from Bakersfield, Calif., to Atlanta - turned out to vent their anger over the Obama’s massive spending levels. A rally-by-rally account of the people who attended the events suggests that turnout could have been much higher.

The seemingly spontaneous April 15 protests have since grown into a more muscular movement of patriotic Americans concerned that the huge and escalating cost of government under President Obama and his party threatens to plunge the country into paralyzing levels of debt and taxes that will rob them of their economic freedoms.

What will Obama do this time to silence the dissent? Will he release a new more deadly strain of swine flu like he did the day after the April 15, 2009 Tax Day Tea Party Revolt? Congressmen and women from both parties have already made public that Obama intends on transforming the US from a democratic state governed by the people to a despotic rule fascist government with Obama as the new self-imposed head of state. A person who would lie about his name and place of birth cannot be trusted. Law enforcement agents within the US government have found that Obama’s legal name is Barry not Barack. They have found that he is not and never was eligible to be president of the United States as he has a dual citizenship - illegal under US law because he has sworn allegiance to another state. They have uncovered that Obama submitted a forged live birth document to the US Congress as the one he submitted has the name Barack Obama instead of his legal and birth name of Barry Obama.

Obama is a Trojan horse. He illegally assumed the presidency for the sole purpose of destroying the US. In the short time he has been in office he has accumulated more debt than all the presidents before him. He is the first and only president to suspend parts of the United States Constitution - the Supreme law of the United States. He has illegally suspended the people’s 6th Amendment and he will soon suspend their 2nd Amendment. Obama is the number one enemy of the United States and the people plan on taking back their Independence on July 4th 2009.

On July 4, 2009 show the World that Obama doesn’t represent the United States people. Reclaim your Independence and Rights guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution. Show Obama dictators are not welcomed in the United States of America.

First Barack Obama’s candidacy and now his presidency have been buttressed by a malleable media and by supporters promoting illegitimate, agenda-driven “science,” both of which have their antecedents in the rise to and consolidation of power of Josef Stalin in Russia nearly a century ago. The parallels between Stalin’s and Obama’s regimes, to say nothing of the potential disastrous similarities in outcomes, are striking.

During the late 1920s and early ’30s, the New York Times’ Walter S. Duranty would misrepresent Stalin and Soviet Communism to the world in much the same way the Times and other sympathetic media outlets misrepresented who Barack Obama was during the 2008 presidential campaign and continue to do now that he has assumed office. While, unlike the Washington Post’s Eli Zaslow, Duranty was apparently not directly acquainted with Russian dictator Josef Stalin’s “glistening pectorals,” the Times’ man in Moscow nonetheless managed to describe the Russian dictator’s messianic qualities quite as capably as Zaslow and the other sycophants who pass for journalists today have done Obama’s.

Duranty characterized Stalin as one of history’s great leaders, those whom God chooses “to lead mankind” and “with whom he [God] speaks directly.” Stalin was for Duranty a “remote, reticent lord” and “the incarnate Superman of Nietzsche.” In characterizing Stalin’s rule, Duranty asserted that “Stalinism re-established the semi-divine, supreme autocracy of the imperial idea and . . . placed itself on the Kremlin throne as a ruler whose lightest word is all in all and whose frown spells death.” (New York Times, June 13, 1931)

It’s difficult to ignore the similarities between Duranty’s gushing about Stalin and that of the contemporary media’s about Obama, not to mention that Obama’s “frown,” having been recently directed at Chrysler and GM, may ultimately spell “death” for those once robustly capitalist companies, said frown having already successfully reduced their executives to little more than toadies nodding amiable assent to being taken over by the U.S. Government.

In 1928, Stalin’s first Five-Year Plan was put into effect, and in the years following, Duranty’s writings about Soviet Russia praised and promoted this “physical expression of all that is meant by ‘Stalinism,’” the mood of his pieces often exhibiting a tingliness worthy of MSNBC’s Chris Matthews. Perhaps prefiguring the Obama administration’s vagueness regarding the particulars of its policies, Duranty insisted that “detailed figures [about Stalin’s initial Five-Year Plan] are confusing and do not matter much as compared with the ‘tempo.’” Duranty’s piece explains that it was agreed by the Bolshevik leadership that an end must be put to the “accumulation of capital” and the ability to “compete unfairly with state industry,” two things that had been the backbone of the successful New Economic Program (NEP) implemented earlier by Stalin’s predecessor, Vladimir Lenin. (NYT, June 15, 1931) Obama’s penchant for engineering scenarios in which many private American companies and banks will not be able to “compete fairly” with their U.S. Government-owned counterparts smells very much like what Stalin was reaching for early in his tenure.

Stalin, as Obama is in the process of doing today, enlisted questionable science in the service of his political agenda, and it’s not out of the question that the results of Obama’s efforts on this front will bring about the contemporary equivalent in America of the human tragedy the Soviet dictator’s policies wrought for the Russian people. From the late 1920s through the 1940s, as Stalin carried out his murderous consolidation of power in the Soviet Union, Trofim Denisovich (T. D.) Lysenko emerged as the leading proponent of a scientific position that would become the basis of Stalin’s disastrous collectivization of agricultural production in the Soviet Union.

Lysenko’s muddy and unsupported theory of plant development — which, among other things, held incorrectly that environment, and not genetics, was the critical factor in determining the length of time it would take a specific type of plant to reach maturity — was applied widely in the Soviet Union during the first Five Year Plan in an attempt to improve the productivity of then recently collectivized Ukrainian farms. The resulting disaster saw millions of kulaks (as the group of peasants singled out in Stalin’s brutal agricultural collectivization strategy was called) murdered, imprisoned, or dead of starvation. An additional five million Soviet citizens perished of starvation because of the precipitous plunge in agricultural production that resulted from the combination of Stalin’s application of Lysenko’s theories and his liquidation of the kulaks, who were the best and most productive farmers in the Soviet Union. Stalin publicly stated that his aim was “the elimination of the kulaks,” and Lysenko was a willing accomplice, lending the use of his illegitimate theories to Stalin’s murderous cause.

Al Gore is the 21st-century energy-industry equivalent of T. D. Lysenko. Like Lysenko, Gore bases his recommendation for drastic changes in the way we conduct business on pseudo-science that has absolutely no foundation in legitimate and dispassionate scientific inquiry. We can hope — there’s that pesky “hope and change” again — that the results of Obama’s Gore-friendly energy policies will not be a dire loss of American lives similar to that resulting from Stalin’s agricultural policies. But it can be argued that the economic hardships for Americans created by energy-policy laws based on illegitimate science and now in the process of being enacted — like the “stimulus” bill likely to be passed without so much as having been read by our federal legislators — will rival the existential hardships of Stalin’s and Lysenko’s victims. The bottom line is that, like the policies implemented on the basis of Lysenko’s theories, the Obama administration’s cap-and-trade legislation is designed to correct a condition — the newly renamed “climate catastrophe” — that simply does not exist.

With a suppression of debate worthy of that of the first Russian Communist dictator, Barack Obama’s administration is rapidly moving toward a consolidation of power that will put our President in league with the likes of Hugo Chavez and at least one Arab sheik, contemporaries with whom Obama has smilingly consorted and to whom he’s bowed down. It’s time for us to take the lessons of history seriously, and to recognize that we’re in the clutches of an administration whose bending of the law and science to its own ends parallels those of one of the most murderous tyrants this planet has ever known, a despot in whose footsteps Barack Obama seems to be hellbent on following.

Barry Soetoro pretends to be Barack Hussein Obama.

A growing number of US people are challenging Barack Hussein Obama’s right to be president of the United States of America. They fear that they have been grossly deceived by Obama. Obama to this day refuses to release to the public an official legal copy of his birth certificate. He refuses because evidence is surfacing that his birth certificate that he presented to Congress as proof of eligibility could very well be a fake. There is no live birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii because his birth first name was Barry. Numerous official government documents records Obama’s name as Barry Soetoro. School registries shows the registration of Barack Obama under the name Barry Soetoro. During his Occidental College days he is registered as Barry Soetoro. An entry in the journal of the California assembly in reference to grants given to foreign exchange students states Obama as Barry Soetoro from Indonesia. The first name of a child is always the same from birth. If throughout his childhood Obama went by the first name of Barry then legally his birth name would have to be Barry. In order to register any child for school an official birth certificate must be presented. To receive a government grant proof of citizenship and birth must also be submitted. All of the evidence is stating that Barack Obama’s legal first name is Barry not Barrack. There seems to be no record of Obama legally changing his first name from Barry to Barack. Barack is an assumed name, one he adopted during his college days.

A 2007 Associated Press photograph, suppressed until now, showed the school register of the child who is today known as Barack Hussein Obama but was officially listed then as Barry Soetoro, whose citizenship was listed as “Indonesian” and whose religion was listed as “Islam.” The visual evidence starkly contradicts the Obama campaign’s claim that he was not a Muslim and confirms that he is a national of at least one other country.

“Obama’s mother, divorced from Obama’s father, married a man from Indonesia named Lolo Soetoro, and the family relocated to the country from 1967-71. At first, Obama attended the Catholic school, Fransiskus Assisis, where documents showed he enrolled as a Muslim, the religion of his stepfather. The document required that each student choose one of five state-sanctioned religions when registering — Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Catholic or Protestant. Gibbs said he wasn’t sure why the document had Obama listed as a Muslim.”

Gibbs may not have been sure, but it appears that the Obama campaign made sure that this image did not see the light of day, because the photographic listing of the candidate, even as a child, as an Indonesian whose religion was Islam was worth, well, a thousand words. “Senator Obama has never been a Muslim,” Gibbs said in the article. “As a six-year-old in Catholic school, he studied the catechism.”

That may be Gibbs’ assertion, but evidence from grown-up school chums of little Barry Soetoro indicates that he studied, and excelled in, the teachings of the Koran in the original Arabic and could recite the Shehada, the Islamic article of faith, by heart, and with a decent tune, according to the New York Times roving columnist Nicholas Kristof, to whom “Obama” remarked that the sound of the Muslim call to prayer was one of the world’s most beautiful sounds.

The AP article quoted Iis Darmawan, 63, Obama’s kindergarten teacher, who “remembers him as an exceptionally tall and curly haired child who quickly picked up the local language and had sharp math skills. ‘He wrote an essay titled, “I Want To Become President,”‘ the teacher said.” She didn’t indicate which country he wanted to become president of.

The AP caption reads: “This registration document, made available on Jan. 24, 2007, by the Fransiskus Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia, shows the registration of Barack Obama under the name Barry Soetoro into the Catholic school made by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro. The document lists Barry Soetoro as a Indonesian citizen, born on August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, and shows his Muslim step-father listed the boy’s religion as Islam. (AP Photo/ Tatan Syuflana)” Syuflana is a well-known and frequently published photographer, specializing in Indonesia.

The most damaging revelation in the AP photo may turn out to be the listing of his name as Barry Soetoro. It has been reported that he used the name Barack Hussein Obama and failed to mention Barry Soetoro when asked to provide any former names. (He reportedly also did not respond honestly when answering negatively to a question concerning illegal drug use, which he has since admitted.) It is believed that failure to report his previous name is not an isolated instance, and may have contributed to the perceived need to manufacture a forged birth certificate listing Obama’s preferred identity as if it were present from the start.

The listing of Barry Soetoro as a Muslim contradicts what appears on his campaign’s Fight the Smears website, where he says that “I have never been a Muslim.” In a private meeting with Jewish leaders in February, Obama emphatically re-stated the claim, but with a bit of a twist, declaring: “I am not, nor have I ever been, a Muslim (especially an anti-American one).”

No one is claiming, here, that Obama is anti-American. But the image of his school registration doesn’t lie, and indicates clearly that he was registered as a Muslim, and thus, despite the claim of his spokesman, he didn’t study the catechism. Barry Soetoro studied the Koran.

Evidence that Obama is an imposter

There is a biography of Barry Soetoro ’s Occidental College days. It states that when Barry Soetoro was 18-19 he attended school as BARRY SOETORO. And it wasn’t until he met a girl by the name of REGINA who was the first to start calling him Barack.

It was then that Obama changed his first name from Barry to Barrack. “She accepted Obama the way he was. He did not have to put on an act for her. She was one of the first to call him Barack instead of Barry. She said Barack was a beautiful name.”

While being sworn as an attorney in the State of Illinois, Mr Obama had to provide his personal information under oath. He was asked, if he had any other names, he responded none. In reality, he used the name Barry Soetoro. There was an entry in the journal of the California assembly in reference to grants given to foreign exchange students, one Soetoro from Indonesia. Mr. Soetoro/Obama clearly defrauded the State Bar of Illinois and perjured himself while concealing his identity. Anybody else would’ve been disbarred for this and the matter would’ve been forwarded to the district attorney for prosecution for perjury and fraud, however nothing was done to Mr. Obama. More importantly, why did he conceal his identity?

Wherether or not he legally changed his name is still to be determined. If he didn’t legally have his name changed then the birth certificate he passed to Congress is a fake as his name at birth was Barry Soetoro.

Article II of the Constitution does not allow for dual-citizenship or allegiance to another country.

In addition to the above, Obama would have been a U.S. citizen, 8 USC §1481(a)(2) provides loss of nationality by native born citizens upon “taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state … after having attained the age of eighteen years,” in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1401(a)(1). Simply put, since Indonesia did not allow for dual citizenship, if Obama got that passport in 1981, when he was 20 years old, he effectively renounced any U.S. citizenship he may have had.

“So, if the experts are right, Obama forged a Certification of Live Birth to fool America. In addition to the automatic Indonesian citizenship granted to a child acknowledged as a “son” by an Indonesian male citizen, and the Indonesian citizenship listed in Obama’s school records, Obama then traveled to a place where Americans weren’t allowed to go, but citizens of Indonesia were. If he obtained an Indonesian passport on his trip in 1981, he effectively renounced any American citizenship he may have had and cannot serve as president (or “rule” as president, as members of his campaign have stated).

The H1N1 virus was carried from Mexico on April 18, officials said, on United Flight 822 to Dulles International Airport

A Senior Special Agent at U.S. Department of Energy who travelled to Mexico with President Obama on April 16, 2009 is the first documented and confirmed H1N1 swine flu infection case. The agent is patient zero. Patient zero infected several members of his family in Anne Arundel County, prompting assurances from the White House that the president was safe.

Marc S. Griswold, a former Secret Service agent who was serving as the lead advance special agent for Energy Secretary Steven Chu on president Obama’s April trip to Mexico, said in an interview that the minor cough he developed in Mexico grew into swine flu. Although he has recovered and is back to work, he and his family have watched in shock as his illness has sparked national security concerns, severely strained his relationship with his brother (Griswold probably infected his nephew) and put his family at the center of rumors and panic in his Severna Park neighbourhood. Griswold said in frustration on the front steps of his house. “We’ve been told we’re not contagious. We’re already past the seven-day mark for that.”

At the White House, press secretary Robert Gibbs did not identify Griswold by name but said officials asked the infected agent whether he remembers coming within six feet of the president during the trip. The answer was no, Gibbs told reporters. Obama’s doctor, David Martin, issued a letter to more than 100 White House staffers and reporters, alerting them that they had been exposed but expressing confidence that further infections were unlikely.

“The president, as I’ve said here many times, has not experienced any symptoms, and the doctors see no need to conduct any tests,” Gibbs said.

Griswold stated that his symptoms started innocuously, with a minor cough that began soon after his trip to Mexico as part of the president’s entourage.

Obama and Chu, accompanied by Griswold, were part of a “working dinner” in Mexico on April 16. Griswold returned from Mexico on April 18, officials said, on United Flight 822 to Dulles International Airport.

When he got home, he chalked up the cough to Mexico’s pollution and thought nothing of it the night after his return when he brought a present from Mexico to his brother’s house and stayed for dinner.

Griswold’s wife, Alison, a registered nurse, was the first to notice something wrong in the family. When she checked on her 7-year-old son at school April 21, something about him seemed off. He said he felt fine and he looked all right, Alison Griswold said. But the school nurse said he had a low fever, so Alison took him home and kept him there for two days until he recovered.

Then she started getting sick: a cough, a high fever and chills. That Friday, Griswold and his wife went to a doctor, who wasn’t overly concerned. On Sunday, they saw another doctor, who gave them a flu test that came back negative. On Tuesday, on advice from health officials, the couple and their youngest child got the more thorough nasal swab test.

The results came in Wednesday morning: positive for Type A influenza, probably the swine flu. As reports of their test results reached the White House, officials immediately began piecing together Griswold’s brief connection to Obama. Aides began calling people who had traveled with the president and informed the president.

The White House press office began preparing to make a dramatic reversal. For days, Gibbs had insisted there had been no real danger of infection during Obama’s Mexico visit. Gibbs shot down repeated questions about health concerns, saying Obama “has not exhibited any symptoms; neither has anybody travelling with him.”

Agent Zero spreads the H1N1 virus globally

How did the H1N1 virus spread? Marc S. Griswold returned from Mexico on April 18, officials said, on United Flight 822 to Dulles International Airport. Washington Dulles International Airport is a public airport located 25 miles (40 km) west of the central business district of Washington, D.C., in Dulles, Virginia. Dulles is served by nearly a dozen U.S.-flagged carriers and nearly two dozen international carriers.[4] Airlines serving Dulles provide non-stop service to over 80 domestic destinations and to over 40 international destinations. On a typical day, Dulles sees 1,000 to 1,200 flight operations.

When word got out that Agent Marc S. Griswold was infected with the H1N1 virus the government was only concerned about the health of president Obama. No one sought to contact everyone on the same flight as Griswold. If you have a confirmed case of an influenza outbreak the immediate response is for the government to immediately track down everyone who came in contact with Patient Zero and initiate a quarantine. No one, not even Obama, bothered to spring into to action to prevent the spread of the H1N1 virus that the WHO is still warning has the potential of becoming a pandemic. Obama, the WHO and the CDC failed to do their job to protect the people from this influenza outbreak. It is as if they wanted it to happen. Instead of quarantining Griswold, his family, and everyone who came in contact with Griswold on United Airlines Flight 822 they allowed the H1N1 influenza virus to spread. Dulles international airport was the hub for the H1N1 virus to spread globally.

Obama has a responsibility to the people. As president he failed as miserably as George W Bush’s handling of Hurricane Katrina. Obama’s complete inaction shows complacency. Inaction could also imply conspiracy. Perhaps the rumours are true. Did Obama order a biological attack against Mexico and his own country? What was Obama’s motive to unleash a biological weapons grade influenza strain? What was the means? What opportunity did he have? Motive could be the Tax Day Tea Party which millions of ordinary US citizens participated in as a nation wide protest against Obama’s government policies and out of control spending that occurred on April 15, 2009 - the day before Obama landed in Mexico. Not even in office 100 days the people were angrily protesting and petitioning Obama and his government for change. Did Obama fear they would ask for his resignation? Did he react out of anger because the US people no longer saw him as their saviour and out of anger ordered the H1N1 virus released? He surely had the means. Fort Detrick where this new viral infection was created is just outside Washington DC. He did have Air Force One at his disposal as a means to transport the virus from Fort Detrick to Mexico. Air Force one is considered US soil no matter where it lands and as such no country can board it or inspect it. He did have an excuse to go to Mexico right away. Mexico had a very violent and deadly drug war going on until the first case of H1N1 virus was reported in Mexico. Before the H1N1 virus outbreak the news was reporting daily about the battle between the Mexican government and the drug lords. Bodies were being discovered by US border guards on a daily bases. That has all but stop as a result of the H1N1 flu.

Take a look at special agent Griswold’s employment record:

Currently Special Agent at U.S. Department of Energy
Formerly Senior Special Agent at DHHS/FDA Office of Criminal Investigations, Special Agent at U.S. Secret Service and Police Officer - seasonal at Ocean City, MD Police Department

As Senior Special Agent at Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) / Food and Drug Agency (FDA) Office of Criminal Investigations
March 2002 — March 2007 (5 years 1 month)

- Griswold conducted federal criminal investigations involving consumer product tampering, bio-terrorism, agro-terrorism, counterfeit pharmaceuticals, medical fraud. Bioterrorism is terrorism by intentional release or dissemination of biological agents (bacteria, viruses, or toxins); in a naturally-occurring or in a human-modified form. Griswold is a bio-terrorism special agent who has first hand knowledge of all biological hazards and weapons grade viruses and has high level security clearance and access to biological hazards and weapons facilities including Fort Detrick. It should be noted that on April 22, 2009 the Army’s Criminal Investigation Command launched an immediate and full investigation of Fort Detrick in Frederick, Maryland, to investigate the disappearance of vials of a potentially dangerous virus. The vials had been at the research institute’s facility at Fort Detrick, home of the Army’s top biological research facility. The vials contained samples of a virus that sickens horses and can be spread to humans. In 97 percent of cases, humans with the virus suffer flu-like symptoms, but it can be deadly in about 1 out of 100 cases, according to Caree Vander Linden, a spokeswoman for the Army’s Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. The symptoms and the death rate pretty much matches that of the H1N1 flu outbreak.

- Griswold was also responsible for COOP/COG operations - He was a special agent assigned to the Continuity of Operations & Continuity of Government operations. COOP and COG are terms that were first used to refer to the “shadow government” that was conceived during the Cold War as a way to ensure that the U.S. government would be able to continue in case of nuclear war. In addition, continuity planning was a requirement for state and local governments under the Civil Defense program mandates. Today, COOP planning remains an important planning requirement. While terrorism may be the threat that is leading to the increase in planning efforts, COOP and COG planning will help ensure government services in the face of any hazard - including nuclear bomb detonation, dirty bomb or a biological attack.

Griswold has the perfect credentials, infectious disease knowledge and experience and access to biologically weaponized viruses to be selected by Obama to launch a biological attack against Mexico, the US and the World. The media only focused on his title of Special Agent at U.S. Department of Energy so that the connection between this agent of the US government and the H1N1 virus outbreak would not be noticed. Further investigation is required. There are just too many coincidences for this to be just a coincidence. Motive, means and opportunity exists to warrant a full and thorough investigation. This would not be the first time a virus was intentionally released by an agent of the US government. January 9 1977 : The New York daily Newsday ran an article where a CIA agent admitted that he was involved in introducing a virus into Cuba which in 1971 caused an outbreak of African swine fever. With at least the tacit backing of U.S. Central Intelligence Agency officials, operatives linked to anti-Castro terrorists introduced the African swine fever virus into Cuba in 1971. The 1971 outbreak, the first and only time the disease has hit the Western Hemisphere, was labeled the “most alarming event” of 1971 by the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization. African swine fever is a highly contagious and usually lethal viral disease that infects only pigs and, unlike swine flu, cannot be transmitted to humans. The CIA agent stated he was given the virus in a sealed, unmarked container at a U.S. Army base and CIA training ground in the Panama Canal Zone, with instructions to turn it over to the anti-Castro group. The virus was carried aboard a trawler to Navassa Island, a tiny, deserted, U.S.-owned island between Jamaica and Haiti. From there, after the trawler made a brief stopover, the container was taken to Cuba and given to other operatives on the southern coast near the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo Bay. On January 15, 1977 A U.S. Senator with the United States Senate Select Committee demanded that then CIA Director George Bush provide information about the bacteriological attack against Cuba. By January 20, 1977 George HW Bush was no longer CIA Director a post he held for less than a year - January 30, 1976 when Bush replaced acting CIA director William Colby – January 20, 1977 - After Jimmy Carter’s Democratic administration took power in 1977.

written by Paul W Kincaid
Toronto, Ontario Canada

The cheapest and cleanest fuel is all ready on tap. The technology is already here to break free of the oil depedency.

Ever wonder what it would be like to not pay the high cost of fuel? Ever wonder if there is a better, cheaper, safer and environmentally friendly fuel source? The truth is we had it all along, for millions of years. The one thing that sustains all life - plants, animals and humans - is also the source of our past, present and future energy needs. The oldest, cheapest and cleanest fuel source is water. Water covers 71% the Earth’s surface, the oceans contain 97.2% of Earth’s water. The Antarctic ice sheet, which contains 90% of all fresh water on Earth. All ready knew that. What most of you don’t tend to remember is that water is composed of two gases - Oxygen and Hydrogen. Water is known as H2O with Hydrogen content being 2 parts to 1 part Oxygen. So what? Oxygen is what we all breath, including the engines in our vehicles. Hydrogen is the most abundant of the chemical elements, constituting roughly 75% of the universe’s elemental mass. To the point, hydrogen is a flammable gas making it a viable fuel source.

You’ve heard of hydrogen fuel cells being tested in new vehicles. They have made vehicles that run on hydrogen fuel cells, or in other words on hydrogen. If they already have the technology to run our vehicles on hydrogen why haven’t we gotten away from the pollution and war causing oil? The answer is profit. Once the technology gets out and it is, the general population will have access to unlimited “free” fuel. Until they can monopolize all the water in the World they will develop new hydrogen technology at a crawl pace. Look at the oil companies today. They are the top of the Fortune 500. Record profits are being made.

Every ship that sets to sea already has access to an unlimited supply of fuel. Every ocean vessel can sail without ever stopping to refuel. No more contaminating the water when ships dump their bilge water before entering ports. Their clean burning fuel is sea water. Sea water can be split into its Oxygen and Hydrogen gases and the hydrogen can be used to power the ship’s engines. The technology is there to drastically reduce our dependency on oil today. A Canadian owned company in Toronto , Ontario Canada is working on a “Water for Fuel Project” that uses sea water as the fuel source for gas generators, gas stoves, barbecues, gas furnaces and gas lamps. The same device being developed can be modified to provide hydrogen gas from sea water to power the engines of every ship that sets sail carrying cargo, grain, and tourists. This device will drastically reduce the operating costs for every ocean vessel.

With Global Warming being blamed for the rising sea water levels using sea water as fuel is another viable solution to prevent shorelines from disappearing. We can’t drink sea water so why not convert it to an energy source. By doing so we also would be reoxygenating the air we breathe. When we extract the Hydrogen (H2) from the water (H2O) we are left with Oxygen. Something we and every other living creature on Earth needs to live.


Maxine Waters, a Democratic member of the United States House of Representatives since 1991, representing California’s 35th congressional district has confirmed on the Glenn Beck show that Obama’s sole plan for the United States is to convert the US from a democratic state to a socialist state. “Obama told us. They’re taking over! They want socialism!,” Waters stated.

As bad as the oil companies are, the banks are, corporations, other large businesses are, what Americans do NOT want is for thir government to nationalize them. But that’s the plan! Government is too corrupt to run the country and businesses!

They want more of your hard-earned money!

1. They searched for a way to get the people to believe it was best;
2. the wealthy agreed to get the people angry and abuse the system . . . .
3. It was part of the scam!
4. Once Socialism is firmly in place, the classes are set in place - the American Dream is over!

The chance to start your own business by struggling, investing, working hard, . . . that sill exists. But Socialism? That enables FASCISM! It’s knocking on the door! They’ve just not got all their ducks in a row . . . not yet, but almost.

Though the media is not broadcasting what the plan is, think about it! You think D.C. would not jump at a chance to take 65% of your earnings and give you . . . a poor health care system like Europe has?

The financiers of the US know full well that the costs of the Obama stimulus and financial plans will not only bankrupt the U.S., but push the US further down the path towards Mussolini-style corporatist fascism.

This descent into fascism, a feature of the Bush/Cheney years, is a virtual replay of the attempt to impose fascism in the United States in the early 1900s . That attempt was defeated by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, but it remains to be seen whether President Obama will rise to that level.

Where is the proof?

The idea behind bank nationalization is that the government would step in and take over the banks, buying up a majority of stock, imposing a few insignificant controls, and then absorbing the banks’ losses. The government would, in effect, transfer trillions of dollars of toxic waste from the books of the banks to the backs of the taxpayers. The public would be told that this is being done to restart the economy, when, in fact, it would be a significant expansion of what is already the greatest swindle in history.

The banks, once freed from their losses, would somehow magically begin to lend again; investors would once again start buying securities; and we could go right back to what we were doing before. That is, in effect, what Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke is saying, when he talks about the need to restart the securities markets.

The U.S. government and the Federal Reserve have already handed out trillions of dollars in loans, stock purchases, guarantees, and outright gifts to bankrupt financial institutions, accompanied by all sorts of optimistic statements that, this time, it will work.

How are we going to pay for these enormous obligations Washington has so criminally dumped upon us, when we’re already operating at a loss? It’s no secret: higher taxes and cuts in services. The recent comments by Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood about taxing drivers per mile driven are indicative of where were are headed, as the budget crises become more acute. More toll roads, higher fees for water and sewer services, fees to use public facilities that were previously free, the expansion of traffic cameras to enhance revenues from fines and jack up insurance rates—this is where we are headed. People with special health and educational needs will increasingly be abandoned, as services are cut.

Some economists consider the U.S. government’s takeover of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Association to have been nationalization. The conservatorship model used with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is looser and more temporary than nationalization.

Some economists consider the U.S. government’s actions with regards to Citigroup to have been a partial nationalization. Proposal made that banks like Citigroup be brought under a conservatorship model similar to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that some of their “good assets” be dropped into newly created “good bank” subsidiaries (under new management), and the remaining “bad assets” be left to be managed under the supervision of a conservatorship structure. The U.S. government’s actions with regard to General Motors in replacing the CEO with a government approved CEO is likewise being considered as nationalization. On June 1, 2009, General Motors filed for bankruptcy, with the United States investing up to $50 billion and taking immediate 60% ownership in the company. GM is protected by the courts from demands from any creditor, that includes the US government, by way of an automatic stay, yet on the same day that GM filed for bankruptcy Obama assumed controlling ownership of the company - all without court approval - a serious abuse of the separation of power by Obama. President Obama stated that the nationalization was temporary, saying, “We are acting as reluctant shareholders because that is the only way to help GM succeed”. The US government was a creditor not a shareholder. The existing shareholders of GM never voted to sell their shares to Obama, Obama just took them without any legal authority to do so.

Obama is converting the US from a democracy to a socialist then a fascist state through illegal means. The nationalizing of big businesses and banks in the US is being done illegally. The president of the United States has no legal authority to make any laws. He has no legal authority to assume dictatorial authority over the people. Obama did not have the legal authority to fire the CEO of GM, only the shareholders had that right. Obama is assuming he is the king of the United States, an assumption that is prohibited by US law - the US Constitution prohibits any president from assuming despotic rule over the US people. The US Constitution was drafted in order to prevent anyone from becoming a despotic ruler. It is the Supreme Law of the United States and it declares that Barack Hussein Obama is an enemy of the United States and the people have the “right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security”.

A socialist or fascist future need not happen, and can be prevented almost immediately. The principles have already been established, in the Constitution, in the success of Alexander Hamilton in organizing the finances of the young United States, in the success of Abraham Lincoln in holding the Union together under a concerted British attack, and in the success of FDR in defeating the fascists in the 1930s, and leading the nation out of the Great Depression.

Declaration of Independence names Barrack Hussein Obama as an enemy of the United States

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.


written by Harry V. Martin

Article I, Section 1 of the United States Constitution is concise in its language, “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” When the Constitution was proposed, those opposed to a strong central government, the anti-Federalists, argued that there was no Bill of Rights to protect the people and that a centralized government would become too powerful, usurping the rights of the individual States.

At the time of its formation, the Constitution was created in secrecy and in direct contradiction to the mandate of the Congress, which was to amend the Articles of Confederation that were governing the infant nation since the end of the American revolution. Under the Articles of Confederation, the President of the United States was known as the President of the United States in Congress Assembled. The one-year Presidency was very limited in its scope, responsibility and authority. The Constitution, in contrast to the Articles of Confederation, established a strong four-year Presidency, but still only providing extremely limited powers to the office.

The greatest fear the founders of this nation had was the establishment of a strong central government and a strong political leader at the center of that government. They no longer wanted kings, potentates or czars, they wanted a loose association of States in which the power emanated from the States and not from the central government.

John Adams advocated that a good government consists of three balancing powers, the legislative, executive and the judicial, that would produce an equilibrium of interests and thereby promote the happiness of the whole community. It was Adams’ theory that the only effectual method to secure the rights of the people and promote their welfare was to create an opposition of interests between the members of two distinct bodies (legislative and executive) in the exercise of the powers of government, and balanced by those of a third (judicial).


On June 8, 1789, James Madison proposed the Bills of Rights to the new Congress. Its eventual creation was the outcropping of arguments made in the respective State legislatures debating ratification of the new Constitution. Madison had previously been opposed to the establishment of the Bill of Rights, but the treatises of Thomas Jefferson convinced him of the necessity of such Constitutional amendments. The concept was simple, according to Madison, “That all power is originally vested in, and consequently derived from the people. That government is instituted and ought to be exercised for the benefit of the people; which consists in the enjoyment of life and liberty and the right of acquiring property, and generally of pursing and obtaining happiness and safety. That the people have an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform or change their government whenever it be found adverse or inadequate to the purpose of its institution.”

He further advocated, “The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship…The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable. The people shall not be restrained from peaceably assembling and consulting for their common good; nor for applying to the legislature by petitions or remonstrances for redress of their grievances…The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

The framework of this nation is embodied in the Bill of Rights, unequaled in its time, and surpassed by none to date. Madison also stated, “The rights of the people to be secured in their persons, their houses, their papers, and their other property from all unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated by warrants issued without probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, or not particularly describing the places to be searched, or the persons or things to be seized.” He added, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial to be informed of the cause and nature of the accusation, to be confronted with his accusers and the witnesses against him; to have a compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”


Many of the fears of the founding fathers may now be coming to fruition. Today, the executive branch of the government is immensely powerful, much more powerful than the founding fathers had envisioned or wanted. Congressional legislative powers have been usurped. There is no greater example of that usurpation than in the form of the Presidential Executive Order. The process totally by-passes Congressional legislative authority and places in the hands of the President almost unilateral power. The Executive Order governs everything from the Flag Code of the United States to the ability to single-handedly declare Martial Law. Presidents have used the Executive Order in times of emergencies to override the Constitution of the United States and the Congress.

President Andrew Jackson used executive powers to force the law-abiding Cherokee Nation off their ancestral lands. The Cherokee fought the illegal action in the U.S. Supreme Court and won. But Jackson, using the power of the Presidency, continued to order the removal of the Cherokee Nation and defied the Court’s ruling. He stated, “Let the Court try to enforce their ruling.” The Cherokee lost their land and commenced a series of journeys that would be called The Trail of Tears.

President Abraham Lincoln suspended many fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. He closed down newspapers opposed to his war-time policies and imprisoned what many historians now call political prisoners. He suspended the right of trial and the right to be confronted by accusers. Lincoln’s justification for such drastic actions was the preservation of the Union above all things. After the war and Lincoln’s death, Constitutional law was restored.

In 1917, President Woodrow Wilson could not persuade Congress to arm United States vessels plying hostile German waters before the United States entered World War One. When Congress balked, Wilson invoked the policy through a Presidential Executive Order.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued Executive Order No. 9066 in December 1941. His order forced 100,000 Japanese residents in the United States to be rounded up and placed in concentration camps. The property of the Japanese was confiscated. Both Lincoln’s and Roosevelt’s actions were taken during wartime, when the very life of the United States was threatened. Wilson’s action was taken on the eve of the United States entering World War One. Whether history judges these actions as just, proper or legal, the decision must be left to time. The dire life struggle associated with these actions provided plausible argumentation favoring their implementation during a time when hysteria ruled an age.


A Presidential Executive Order, whether Constitutional or not, becomes law simply by its publication in the Federal Registry. Congress is by-passed. Here are just a few Executive Orders that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These Executive Orders have been on record for nearly 30 years and could be enacted by the stroke of a Presidential pen:

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

Without Congressional approval, the President now has the power to transfer whole populations to any part of the country, the power to suspend the Press and to force a national registration of all persons. The President, in essence, has dictatorial powers never provided to him under the Constitution. The President has the power (assumed) to suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in a real or perceived emergency. Unlike Lincoln and Roosevelt, these powers are not derived from a wartime need, but from any crisis, domestic or foreign, hostile or economic. Roosevelt created extraordinary measures during the Great Depression, but any President faced with a similar, or lesser, economic crisis now has extraordinary powers to assume dictatorial status.

Many of the Executive Orders cited here have been on the books for over a quarter of a century and have not been applied. Therefore, what makes them more dangerous today than yesteryear? There has been a steady, consistent series of new Executive Orders, originating from President Richard Nixon and added to by Presidents Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter and George Bush that provide an ominous Orwellian portrait, the portrait of George Orwell’s 1984.


A series of Executive Orders, internal governmental departmental laws, unpassed by Congress, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 and the Violent Crime Control Act of 1991, has whittled down Constitutional law substantially. These new Executive Orders and Congressional Acts allow for the construction of concentration camps, suspension of rights and the ability of the President to declare Martial Law in the event of a drug crisis. Congress will have no power to prevent the Martial Law declaration and can only review the process six months after Martial Law has been declared. The most critical Executive Order was issued on August 1, 1971. Nixon signed both a proclamation and Executive Order 11615. Proclamation No. 4074 states, “I hereby declare a national emergency”, thus establishing an economic crisis. That national emergency order has not been rescinded.

The crisis that changed the direction of governmental thinking was the anti-Vietnam protests. Fear that such demonstrations might explode into civil unrest, Executive Orders began to be created to allow extreme measures to be implemented to curtail the demonstrations. The recent Los Angeles riots after the Rodney King jury verdict only reinforced the government’s concern about potential civil unrest and the need to have an effective mechanism to curtail such demonstrations.

Here are the later Executive Orders:

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 12148 created the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) that is to interface with the Department of Defense for civil defense planning and funding. An “emergency czar” was appointed. FEMA has only spent about 6 percent of its budget on national emergencies, the bulk of their funding has been used for the construction of secret underground facilities to assure continuity of government in case of a major emergency, foreign or domestic.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 12656 appointed the National Security Council as the principal body that should consider emergency powers. This allows the government to increase domestic intelligence and surveillance of U.S. citizens and would restrict the freedom of movement within the United States and granted the government the right to isolate large groups of civilians. The National Guard could be federalized to seal all borders and take control of U.S. air space and all ports of entry. Many of the figures in the Iran-Contra scandal were part of this emergency contingent, including Marine Colonel Oliver North.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every aspect of the nation. General Frank Salzedo, chief of FEMA’s Civil Security Division stated in a 1983 conference that he saw FEMA’s role as a “new frontier in the protection of individual and governmental leaders from assassination, and of civil and military installations from sabotage and/or attack, as well as prevention of dissident groups from gaining access to U.S. opinion, or a global audience in times of crisis.”

The Violent Crime Control Act of 1991 provides additional powers to the President of the United States, allowing the suspension of the Constitution and Constitutional rights of Americans during a “drug crisis”. It provides for the construction of detention camps, seizure of property, and military control of populated areas. This, teamed with the Executive Orders of the President, enables Orwellian prophecies to rest on whoever occupies the White House. The power provided by these “laws” allows suspension of the Constitution and the rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights during any civil disturbances, major demonstrations and strikes and allows the military to implement government ordered movements of civilian populations at state and regional levels, the arrest of certain unidentified segments of the population, and the imposition of Martial Law.

When the Constitution of the United States was framed it placed the exclusive legislative authority in the hands of Congress and with the President. Article I, Section 1 of the United States Constitution is concise in its language, “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” That is no longer true. The Bill of Rights protected Americans against loss of freedoms. That is no longer true. The Constitution provided for a balanced separation of powers. That is no longer applicable.

Perhaps it can be summed up succinctly in the words of arch-conservative activist Howard J. Ruff. “Since the enactment of Executive Order 11490, the only thing standing between us and dictatorship is the good character of the President, and the lack of a crisis severe enough that the public would stand still for it.”


One of the major misconceptions when comparing fascism and communism comes from the belief that if residential property is solely owned by the State, then you have communism. This is only half true and thus very misleading. Where all private property being owned by the State is communism, you may have fascism with only residential property being State owned. The real difference between fascism and communism is who owns industrial and economic properties. Communism is the complete State ownership of properties while fascism allows for private ownership of the engines of commerce, industry and other business properties, with the State being a major or even majority partner directing industry. Let see if it can be made clearer.

Both fascism and communism start with collectivism and the spread of socialistic government. Both have extensive welfare, government health care, minimum wages, government run unions, and many other socialist programs guaranteeing equal outcome independent of contribution. It is only when the socialist state reaches the extremes that the two diverge. Communism is communal in nature giving complete control and ownership to the government, the ultimate blending of stateism and socialism. Fascism is the blending of industrialism and socialism where government has a large influence over production and uses of property but said property and industry are still private in ownership. Fascism is more readily equated to a dictatorial government though communism is equally capable of being dictatorial. Both can have the appearance of open election though either will have only one party holding the vast majority of power. So, the only true difference is who owned the economic engines. Is the state in complete control forging communism, or does the leaders of industry and the state share power producing fascism.

The one constant between the two is the total lack of serious concern for the regular every day person. In both systems, there will be an elite and their chosen preferred people of importance. Communism puts loyalty to the state as the first priority; fascism places the owners and planners of industry as equal to the party elite. The everyday worker is equally left from any semblance of power or control over their own lives. Let us hope that we wake up before we reach either of these ends; if not, leave a comment saying which way you think we are headed.

The reasoning for the idea that the US is heading towards becoming a fascist state is the ever-increasing amount of federally centered power along with increased socialistic programs. Obama has already transfered the people’s money to his fascist financial backers. He has already suspended the 6th Amendment and with the confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, the 2nd Amendment as she has publicly stated that only the military has the right to bear and keep arms. Obama needs to suspend the inalienable right of the people of the United States to bear arms so that they cannot rebel against his illegal usurpation of the US law - the United States Constitution. On June 1, 2009 Obama put up an iron curtain around the US. Everyone entering the US must now show their papers. Armed border patrol guards are authorized to take government sanctioned actions against anyone trying to enter the US without the proper papers. Today Obama wants the government to control the health care system whereby only those loyal to the government would receive health care and everyone else is allowed to die for the good of the führer’s homeland. Government control of the health care system is vital as coming this fall he will release the A-H1N1 virus again (Obama went to Mexico on April 16, 2009 to infect the Mexican people with the biologically engineered swine flu - the day after the Tax Day Tea Party revolt started) and force every US citizen to submit to a mandatory nation vaccination whereby the deadly combination of swine flu and avian flu will be administered, infecting millions of US citizens including lawmakers and police offices who are loyal to their country and the US Constitution.

Michelle Obama stated during a speech at UCLA on Febrary 18, 2008:

“Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.”

The Declaration of Independence

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

“We will overthrow Parliament in a legal way through legal means. Democracy will be overthrown with the tools of democracy.” Adolf Hitler

“Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way around to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise. ” - Adolp HItler

” Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power.” - Benito Mussolini

” The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to the point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its essence is fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group or any controlling private power. ” - President Franklin Delano Roosevelt - on the threat to democracy by corporate power

Obama has decided to follow even more carefully the examples set by Benito Mussolini and Vladimir Putin, and has sacked the head of a privately owned company. That is a decision for the shareholders of a private firm to make, not for the head of state. What is next? Will private firms end up in the hands of friends of the president? Will the people be required to work for the state as commanded by Obama? Will people be kidnapped from their homes and sent to labor camps or extermination camps? Will journalists who criticize Obama end up in torture facilities like Guantánamo Bay? The writing is literally on the wall with posters of Obama displaying fascist slogans like:

The writing is literally on the wall with posters of Obama displaying fascist slogans like:

1. “Yes We Can” - we meaning the government
2. “Change” versus “More of the Same” - versus meaning equals
3. “Vote for Change” - actually asking you to vote for an end to democracy
4. “Change We Can Believe In” - we again meaning the government
5. “Our Time for Change” - meaning time to change from a democracy to a fascist state.
6. “It’s about Time. It’s about Change” - It’s about government control
7. “Stand for Change” - an order for you to support Obama’s destruction of democracy
8. “Organize for Change” -become good little fascist soldiers and spies
9. “We are the change we’ve been looking for. Change can’t happen without you.” - I am god and I need you to give me what I want
10. “I’m asking you to believe. Not just in my ability to bring about real change in Washington . I’m asking you to believe in yours.” - Telling you to believe and accept your doom
11. “A leader who can deliver change” - Doctor death
12. “Change in America doesn’t start from the top down. It starts from the bottom up.” - Obama blames you for their faults, lack of leadership and corruption.
13. “Obama Momma” - gender crisis perhaps coming out of the closet
14. “Women for Obama” - another Bill Clinton
15. “Obama for America ” - Obama against the United States of America.
16. “A New Beginning” - not the end but the beginning of the end
17. “Help me take back America ” - become traitors to your country
18. ” America , we cannot turn back. We cannot walk alone.” - to late, suckers
21. “We must pledge once more to walk into the future.” - walk with Obama into the Abyss

Beware the liberal fascists - the leaders who aim to ’save’ us by controlling everything we do. Barack Obama loves telling us how to live. ‘We are the ones we’ve been waiting for,’ Obama told mesmerised crowds.

Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Suharto, Pinochet, and Obama all have 14 characteristics that define their politics. Here they are:

1.) Powerful and Continuing Nationalism:Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

2.) Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights: Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of “need.” The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

3.) Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause: The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

4.) Supremacy of the Military: Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

5.) Rampant Sexism: The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.

6.) Controlled Mass Media: Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

7.) Obsession with National Security: Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

8.) Religion and Government are Intertwined: Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions.

9.) Corporate Power is Protected: The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

10.) Labor Power is Suppressed: Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.

11.) Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts: Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.

12.) Obsession with Crime and Punishment: Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

13.) Rampant Cronyism and Corruption: Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.

14. Fraudulent Elections: Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.


Most people still don’t believe that the World Trade Centers were brought down by US commercial airlines crashing into them. Most people, the majority, still don’t believe hijackers were able to hijack 4 US commercial airlines simultaneously and crash them into the World Trade Centers. Experienced commercial pilots have stated that not even with their years of experience could they ever manoeuvre their giant, massively heavy, jets so precisely into a building let alone an inexperienced hijacker. To this day commercial airline pilots from around the World are baffled at how a huge, several stories high, commercial jet could crash into a building on the main floor and not disturb the lawn of the Pentagon. More recently with the crash of the Air France Flight 447 commercial airline pilots are contradicting the government and media interpretation as to what brought down the airline. Government officials and the media are claiming that weather brought down the airline. They are dismissing any hint or suggestion that the airline was brought down by a terrorist act or an explosion, either by a bomb or a missile. Commercial airline pilots with years of experience are stating that a lightning strike could not bring down their aircraft as their aircrafts were built to withstand numerous lightning bolt strikes. FAA regulations requires such designs to be implemented in the production of all aircraft. Another requirement is that all commercial airline aircraft must have, not one control system, but several as well as an emergency backup.

For Fight 447 the government and media are suggesting that lightning knocked out “all” electrical control systems. If that were true then how do they account for the automated messages and alarms that were said to have been sent to the control towers. If a lightning strike did fry all systems then those automated messages could not have been sent as they too are part of the airline’s electronic control systems. So what are the automated messages telling us? It’s stating that the pilots abruptly lost control of their aircraft. It was so immediate that the pilot and crew did not have time to issue a mayday or indicate that their aircraft was hijacked. Their aircraft’s autopilot was abruptly disengaged. There are very few reasons why a pilot would lose control of his aircraft so instantly that he would not be able to somehow communicate with the air traffic controller. The first is an explosion. Either an internal or external explosion. WWII bomber pilots and crew know just how devastating an explosion can be, either on-board or hit externally. An internal explosion, in a confined oxygen enriched and pressurized space, would either blow the aircraft apart or render all on-board unconscious or at the very least disoriented from the blast’s shock wave. If a bomb was in the belly of the aircraft or a missile struck the body of the aircraft the force of the blast would immediately halt or change the flight path of the aircraft and almost immediately the aircraft would fall vertically to the ground in a free fall. Falling to the ground in just 6 seconds as reported by a witness to the plight of Flight 447, would make it impossible for the crew to send a mayday or even communicate. The automated messages received from Flight 447 points to another cause of the crash. A more sinister one. A hijacking. A modern form of hijacking - electronically.

Anyone with a geopolitical agenda could hijack virtually any commercial airline it chooses. They wouldn’t need to plant a bomb or order an aircraft to be shot down. They can now do it electronically. Planting a bomb or shooting an airline down is too risky. The debris could reveal the truth and eventually lead back to who bombed or shot down the aircraft. Hijacking an airline with a individual target on board can be done electronically. The US is the only known country with such technology. They have successfully used this technology in Iraq and Afghanistan. They remotely fly the Predator, an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), throughout the Middle East (Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran) thousands of miles away - from inside the United States.

In a Chicago Tribune report for September 28, 2001 they stated that the military has been flying planes and landing them safely by remote control for years, but airline pilots say questions about security must be answered before that technology is used aboard commercial jetliners to thwart hijackers the way President Bush suggested during a speech in Chicago.

“We will look at all kinds of technologies to make sure that our airlines are safe,” Bush said at O’Hare International Airport. “… including technology to enable controllers to take over distressed aircraft and land it by remote control.”

Pilots said after the speech that though they support other proposals for airplane security that Bush outlined, the idea of aircraft being remotely controlled concerns them. “If the good guys can take control of the plane” from the ground, said John Mazor, a spokesman for the Air Line Pilots Association, “maybe the bad guys can take control of it too.” Taking control of a hijacked aircraft from the ground appears to be less feasible than other measures, he said. “We would view that as a very–very–long-term type of undertaking,” Mazor said. “There are enormous technical difficulties in trying to rig up an aircraft for that.”

But companies that have designed such systems for the military say it wouldn’t be difficult to adapt the technology for commercial aircraft. General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. developed a remote-controlled reconnaissance plane for the Air Force called Predator, which flew in Bosnia during the conflict there and is being used daily for US military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. Used by the military since 1994, it can be landed by pilots linked by satellite using controls on the ground or ordering an onboard computer to do the job.

Tom Cassidy, president and CEO of the San Diego company, said he sent Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta a letter shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks. “Such a system would not prevent a hijacker from causing mayhem on the aircraft or exploding a device and destroying the aircraft in flight,” the letter said, “but it would prevent him from flying the aircraft into a building or populated areas.”

Cassidy said that a pilot aboard a commercial airliner could turn the plane’s guidance over to ground controllers at the press of a button, preventing a hijacker–or anyone else aboard–from flying the plane. That system also would keep people on the ground from taking control of a plane away from the pilot, Cassidy said, because the pilot would first have to give up control.

Aircraft anywhere in the nation could be remotely controlled from just one or two locations using satellite links, Cassidy said. Those locations could be heavily fortified against terrorists. “The technology is available,” Cassidy said. “We use it every day.”

In the mid-seventies America faced a new and escalating crisis, with US commercial jets being hijacked for geopolitical purposes. Determined to gain the upper hand in this new form of aerial warfare, two American multinationals collaborated with the Defense Advanced Projects Agency (DARPA) on a project designed to facilitate the remote recovery of hijacked American aircraft. Brilliant both in concept and operation, “Home Run” (not its real code name) allowed specialist ground controllers to listen in to cockpit conversations on the target aircraft, then take absolute control of its computerized flight control system by remote means.

From that point onwards, regardless of the wishes of the hijackers or flight deck crew, the hijacked aircraft could be remotely commandeered and landed automatically at an airport of choice, with no more difficulty than flying a radio-controlled model plane. The engineers had no idea that almost thirty years after its initial design, Home Run’s top secret computer codes and system would be used to facilitate direct ground control of the four aircraft used in the high-profile attacks on New York and Washington on 11th September 2001.

Before moving on to the New York and Washington attacks, we first need to look at the ways in which an aircraft is normally controlled by its pilot, because without this basic knowledge, Home Run would make no sense. In order to control an aircraft in three-dimensional space, the pilot uses the control yoke (joystick) in front of him, rudder pedals under his feet, and a bank of engine throttles located at his side. Without engine thrust the aircraft would not fly at all, so the throttles are largely self explanatory: For more speed or altitude increase throttle, for less speed or altitude decrease throttle.

In order to raise or lower the nose of the aircraft, the pilot pulls or pushes on the control yoke, which in turn raises or lowers the elevators on the horizontal tailplane. To bank the aircraft left or right, the pilot moves the control yoke to the left or right, which in turn operates the ailerons on the outer wings. Lastly, to turn left or right at low speed or “balance” turns at high speed, the pilot presses the left or right rudder pedals as required, which in turn move the rudder on the vertical stabilizer.

Back in the early days of flight, the control yoke and rudder pedals were connected to the various flight control surfaces by thin cables, meaning the pilot had direct physical control over every movement the aircraft made. This was no great problem for an average man flying a small biplane, but as aircraft grew ever bigger, heavier and faster over the years, the loadings on the control yoke and rudder pedals became huge, certainly well beyond the ability of a single pilot to handle unaided.

By the late fifties we were well into the age of hydraulics, where just like the power steering on your automobile, hydraulic rams were placed in line between the pilot’s control cables and each individual control surface. Now when the pilot moved the control yoke, the cables activated sensors, which in turn activated one or more hydraulic rams, which in turn moved one or more control surfaces. For the first time since Bleriot and the Wright brothers, pilots were of necessity being steadily distanced from direct control of their own aircraft.

When the multinationals and DARPA finally came on the scene in the mid-seventies, aircraft systems were even more advanced, with computers controlling onboard autopilots, which in turn were capable of controlling all of the onboard hydraulics. In combination these multiple different functions were now known as the “Flight Control System” or FCS, in turn integrated with sophisticated avionics capable of automatically landing the aircraft in zero visibility conditions. In summary, by the mid-seventies most of the large jets were capable of effectively navigating hundreds of miles and then making automatic landings at a selected airport in zero-zero fog conditions. All of this could be accomplished unaided, but in theory at least, still under the watchful eyes of the flight deck crews.

In order to make Home Run truly effective, it had to be completely integrated with all onboard systems, and this could only be accomplished with a new aircraft design, several of which were on the drawing boards at that time. Under cover of extreme secrecy, the multinationals and DARPA went ahead on this basis and built “back doors” into the new computer designs. There were two very obvious hard requirements at this stage, the first a primary control channel for use in taking over the flight control system and flying the aircraft back to an airfield of choice, and secondly a covert audio channel for monitoring flight deck conversations. Once the primary channel was activated, all aircraft functions came under direct ground control, permanently removing the hijackers or pilots from the control loop.

The system started out in life for the very best of reasons, but fell prey to security leaks, and eventually to compromised computer codes. Activating the primary Home Run channel proved to be easy. Most readers have heard of a “transponder”, prominent in most news reports immediately following the attacks on New York and Washington. Technically a transponder is a combined radio transmitter and receiver which operates automatically, in this case relaying data between the four aircraft and air traffic control on the ground. The signals sent provide a unique “identity” for each aircraft, essential in crowded airspace to avoid mid-air collisions, and equally essential for Home Run controllers trying to lock onto the correct aircraft. Once it has located the target aircraft, Home Run “piggy backs” a data transmission onto the transponder channel and takes direct control from the ground. This explains why none of the aircraft sent a special “I have been hijacked” transponder code, despite multiple activation points on all four aircraft. Because the transponder frequency had already been piggy backed by Home Run, transmission of the special hijack code was rendered impossible. This was the first hard proof that the target aircraft had been hijacked electronically from the ground, rather than by [FBI-inspired] motley crews of Arabs toting penknives.

The Home Run listening device on the flight deck utilizes the cockpit microphones that normally feed the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR), one of two black boxes armored to withstand heavy impact and thereby later give investigators significant clues to why the aircraft crashed. However, once hooked into Home Run, the CVRs are bypassed and voice transmissions are no longer recorded on the 30-minute endless loop recording tape. If Home Run is active for more than thirty minutes, there will therefore be no audible data on the Cockpit Voice Recorders. To date, crash investigators have recovered the CVRs from the Pentagon and Pittsburg aircraft, and publicly confirmed that both are completely blank. The only possible reason for this, is data capture by Home Run, providing the final hard proof that the attack aircraft were hijacked electronically from the ground, rather than by “Arab terrorists”.

Many might by now be indignant; convinced this is incorrect or misleading information because of “those telephone calls from the hijacked aircraft”. Which telephone calls exactly? There are no records of any such calls, and the emotional claptrap the media fed you in the aftermath of the attack was in all cases third-person. We had the media’s invisible “contact” at an airline who “said” a hostess called to report a hijacking, and we had a priest (?) who “said” he received a call from a man asking him in turn to call his wife and tell her he loved her.

Presumably this man would have had his wife’s name filed in his cellphone, and faced with imminent death would have called her direct. The FAA helped out by claiming that it had “overheard” a heated argument from a cockpit where the radio transmit switch had been left in the “on” position. When push came to shove, the FAA was forced to retract, and admit that the mythical argument was not on the tapes at all.

Critically, the passenger manifests for all four aircraft serve as the final (independent) proof that no alleged hijackers or anyone of Arabic name boarded any of the four aircraft used in the attacks. As Laurence T. May points out: “On September 11, airline check-in counters were the only places in the United States that required travellers to present a photo ID in order to travel. A photo ID meant (and still means) a card issued by some branch of civil government. Years ago, the United States government took the first step toward a national ID card when it mandated the requirement that all passengers present a photo ID card before being allowed to get on a commercial airplane.”

“This means that the tightest security that the typical American ever confronts is airport security. This is the model for all other security systems governing the general public. Let’s go through the check-in routine together. Pretend that it’s September 11, and you are a check-in agent at either a United Airlines counter or an American Airlines counter. It is your job to ask the standard questions. “Did you pack your own luggage? Have you had it in your possession at all times?” Then you ask for a photo ID. The name on the ID must match the name on the ticket. The photo must match the person presenting the card.” .. And, you guessed it, the name on the ID must match that on the passenger manifest held by the airline ground staff!

It seems highly likely that these revealing passenger manifests will magically disappear when the American Government realizes the dangers of allowing the public access to such incriminating documents.

A major European flag carrier learned about Home Run and was seriously alarmed that one of its own aircraft might be “rescued” by the Americans without its authority. Accordingly, this flag carrier completely stripped the American flight control computers out of its entire fleet, and replaced them with a home grown version. These aircraft are now effectively impregnable to penetration by Home Run, but that is more than can be said for the American aircraft fleet or other European aircraft fleet.

Today a hijacker can be someone physically on the aircraft or someone sitting in a room somewhere on the ground or in a shadowing aircraft. Whatever the case the motive of a hijacker to hijack an aircraft is for a political agenda, either a single personal agenda or a government conspiracy. The hijackings of September 11, 2001 served a political purpose, entirely for the US benefit. With those hijackings the US government implemented new government polices, both domestic and foreign. It gave them the excuse to strip the American people of their inalienable rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. It allowed them to grossly violate long standing US laws for their political objectives. It is the reason given by George W Bush to attack 2 totally innocent countries. It gave them the excuse to build up their military and put US soldiers on the soil of foreign sovereign states. Their electronic hijacking of their own commercial airlines launched a war of terror against the World.

Today who had what motive to hijack remotely Air France Flight 447? The initial reports on the passenger manifest names some very prominent and high profile passengers. If the investigation leads to a finding that an electronic failure resulted in the downing of Flight 447 you now can decide for yourself if you believe what they are saying. Just like 9/11 the known facts and the evidence completely contradict the governments and news media’s story.


A member of Brazil’s non-reigning royal family was travelling on the Air France plane that went missing on Monday off Brazil’s north-eastern coast, the Orleans e Braganca family confirmed in a statement.

According to the family’s representatives in Sao Paulo, Prince Pedro Luis de Orleans e Braganca, 26, was among the 228 occupants of the airplane that was en route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris when it disappeared from radar screens.

Pedro de Orleans e Braganca is a descendant of Peter II, the last Emperor of Brazil, who was overthrown in 1889 prior to the proclamation of the Republic.

The missing prince is third in line in the succession to the former Brazilian throne, after his uncles Luiz, who is the head of the house, Bertrand, and his father, Antonio. The prince, who worked for BNP-Paribas, a bank in Luxembourg, was returning there after spending some time with his family in Sao Paulo. “He came to visit his family, and now he is missing,” said Pedro’s uncle, Dom Francisco de Orleans-Braganca.

The Brazilian imperial family was founded in 1822, when Prince Peter, next-in-line to the Portuguese throne, was serving as the Portuguese king’s representative in the Brazilian colony. Peter declared himself emperor of Brazil, followed by the Brazilian declaration of independence in 1825 which was recognized by his father, the Portuguese king.
Thanks to Hindustan time.

New developments in the Air France Flight 447 disappearance have added to the mystery of what may have happened to the ill fated plane. On May 27, 2009 Air France received a bomb threat for a flight out of Buenos Aires to Paris. That flight was delayed until a sweep of the Air France plane showed the bomb threat was a hoax.

Only a few days later Air France Flight 447 disappeared from radar. The one theory that investigators and the media are focusing on is that the jet was downed by lightning, causing a massive electrical short circuit. But an unidentified senior long-haul Air France pilot told a French newspaper: ‘I have flown these jets for Air France for more than ten years and the chances of an electrical fault seem unfeasible to me.

‘There are five electricity supplies on the plane and they would all have to fail.’ He said a bomb was the only logical reason for why the captain failed to send out a mayday call.

French authorities insisted they were not ruling out any possible cause. But they played down the possibility of a terrorist attack, pointing out that no group has claimed responsibility for the disaster.

The Air France flight that was the subject of last Wednesday’s bomb threat was delayed for several hours while a search was carried out, but landed uneventfully in Paris.

Two pilots of an Air Comet flight from Lima to Lisbon saw a bright flash of light in the area where Flight 447 went down, the Madrid-based airline told CNN. The pilots have turned in their report to authorities.

“Suddenly, we saw in the distance a strong and intense flash of white light, which followed a descending and vertical trajectory and which broke up in six seconds,” the captain wrote in the report.

The flash of light contributes to the theory that an explosion is what brought down Flight 447, which was carrying 228 people from Rio de Janeiro to Paris.


In his latest push for an open dialogue with the Muslim world, President Barack Obama on Wednesday sought the counsel of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. Obama opened his Mideast trip with a visit to Abdullah, the monarch of a country that’s home to Islam’s two holiest sites in Mecca and Medina.

“The United States and Saudi Arabia have a long history of friendship,” Obama said as he visited the monarch’s desert horse farm. The U.S. president called Abdullah wise and gracious, adding: “I am confident that working together that the United States and Saudi Arabia can make progress on a whole host of issues of mutual interest.”

In turn, Abdullah expressed his “best wishes to the friendly American people who are represented by a distinguished man who deserves to be in this position.”

Earlier, the king greeted Obama at Riyadh’s main airport with a ceremony when the new U.S. president arrived after an overnight flight from Washington.

With Abdullah alongside him, Obama told reporters: “I thought it was very important to come to the place where Islam began and to seek his majesty’s counsel and to discuss with him many of the issues that we confront here in the Middle East.”

No sooner had Obama landed in Riyadh for a day of meetings with King Abdullah than he was awarded a a big gold medal — the King Abdul Aziz Order of Merit. It’s the country’s highest honor — named for the founder of the modern Saudi state. Saudi Arabia honored George W Bush with the same medal. Its Saudi Arabia’s way of showing it apprecitation for both Bush and Obama not attacking them in retaliation for Saudi Arabia’s Pearl Harbor attack against the US.

How quickly the US government forgets about a series of coordinated suicide attacks by Saudi terrorists upon the United States on September 11, 2001. On that morning, 19 Saudi recruited, trained and financed terrorists hijacked four US commercial passenger jet airliners. The Saudi hijackers intentionally crashed two of the airliners into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, killing everyone on board and many others working in the buildings. Both buildings collapsed within two hours, destroying at least two nearby buildings and damaging others. The Saudi hijackers crashed a third airliner into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, just outside of Washington, D.C. The fourth plane crashed into a field near Shanksville in rural Somerset County, Pennsylvania. There were no survivors from any of the flights.

2,974 victims and the 19 hijackers died in the attacks. Of the 19 hijackers 15 were Saudi Nationals. Members of a US congressional committee probing the attacks have accused the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of not examining claims of a link between the Saudi Government and the hijackers closely enough. According to a BBC report, two hijackers - Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi - received $3,500 a month from two students in the United States via an account in the name of Princess Haifa al-Faisal, the wife of the Saudi ambassador to America.

On September 27, 2001 the FBI named the hijackers of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Nowhere does it name any Afghanistan (including the Taliban) or Iraqi national. Evidence already in possession by the US own FBI implicates Saudi Arabia for the attacks, as the majority of hijackers and the alleged mastermind were all Saudi nationals. Soon after Japan launched a deadly aerial attack on the US at Pearl Harbor on Sunday December 7, 1941 the US declared war against its attacker - Japan. The US retaliated against the country that attacked the US - Japan. They retaliated against Japan because the pilots who attacked Pearl Harbor were Japanese nationals. 60 years later Saudi Arabia attacked the US in New York and Washington using Saudi national pilots and hijackers. Did the US retaliate against Saudi Arabia for their attack on the US on September 11, 2001? The US government’s top police force, the FBI, clearly identified 15 of the attackers as Saudi Nationals. The financing for the attack was traced back to the Saudi Royal family, and the US declared the mastermind of the attacks to be a member of a prominent Saudi family called Osma bin Laden. With the evidence clearly identifying Saudi Arabia as the attacker why do both George W Bush and Barack Hussein Obama still have very high praise for the king of the country that attacked the US that killed 2,974 people? Why do these 2 US presidents consider the Number One Enemy of the United States as their closest friend and ally? Saudi Arabia attacked the US on September 11, 2001 and they are welcomed guests to the US White House. Afghanistan and Iraq had nothing whatsoever to do with the Saudi attacks of 9/11 yet they are the ones who have been attacked, their country destroyed and their people murdered and enslaved by the US under the US military occupation.

FBI Press Release September 27, 2001 naming the Saudi Nationals who hijacked US commercial airlines and killed US citizens.


1) Khalid Almihdhar - Saudi national

2) Majed Moqed - Saudi national

3) Nawaf Alhazmi - Saudi national

4) Salem Alhazmi - Saudi national

5) Hani Hanjour - Saudi national - pilot - resident of Phoenix, Arizona, and San Diego, California


1) Satam M.A. Al Suqami- Saudi national

2) Waleed M. Alshehri - Saudi national - a pilot

3) Wail M. Alshehri - Saudi national - residence(s): Hollywood, Florida; Newton, Massachusetts -Believed to be a pilot

4) Mohamed Atta - Egyptian national - a pilot

5) Abdulaziz Alomari - Saudi national - a pilot


1) Marwan Al-Shehhi - UAE national - Possible residence(s): Hollywood, Florida - a pilot

2) Fayez Rashid Ahmed Hassan Al Qadi Banihammad - UAE national - residence(s): Delray Beach, Florida

3) Ahmed Alghamdi - Saudi national

4) Hamza Alghamdi - Saudi national - residence(s): Delray Beach, Florida

5) Mohand Alshehri - Saudi national - residence(s): Delray Beach, Florida


1) Saeed Alghamdi - Saudi national - residence: Delray Beach, Florida

2) Ahmed Ibrahim A. Al Haznawi - Saudi national

3) Ahmad Al-Nami - Saudi national - residence: Delray Beach, Florida

4) Ziad Samir Jarrah - Lebanese national - a pilot


Military planes located new debris from Air France Flight 447 Wednesday while investigators focused on a nightmarish ordeal in which the jetliner broke up over the Atlantic as it flew through a violent storm.

Investigators have not determined what caused the plane to crash. The flight data recorders have not been recovered, and the plane’s crew did not send any messages indicating problems before the plane disappeared. A Spanish pilot said he saw an “intense flash” in the area where Flight 447 came down off the coast of Brazil, while a Brazilian minister appeared to rule out a mid-air explosion.

Both pilots of an Air Comet flight from Lima to Lisbon sent a written report on the bright flash they said they saw to Air France, Airbus and the Spanish civil aviation authority, the airline told CNN.

“Suddenly, we saw in the distance a strong and intense flash of white light, which followed a descending and vertical trajectory and which broke up in six seconds,” the captain wrote.

Air Comet declined to identify the pilot’s name, but said he waited until landing to inform Air Comet management about what he saw. Air Comet then informed Spanish civil aviation authorities. The Air Comet co-pilot, and a passenger aboard the same flight, also saw the light.

Heavy weather delayed until next week the arrival of deep-water submersibles considered key to finding the black box voice and data recorders that will help answer the question of what happened to the airliner, which disappeared Sunday with 228 people on board. But even with the equipment, the lead French investigator questioned whether the recorders would ever be found in such a deep and rugged part of the ocean.

As the first Brazilian military ships neared the search area, investigators were relying heavily on the plane’s automated messages to help reconstruct what happened to the jet as it flew through towering thunderstorms. They detail a series of failures that end with its systems shutting down, suggesting the plane broke apart in the sky, according to an aviation industry official with knowledge of the investigation, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the crash.

The pilot sent a manual signal at 11 p.m. local time saying he was flying through an area of “CBs” - black, electrically charged cumulonimbus clouds that come with violent winds and lightning. Satellite data has shown that towering thunderheads were sending 100 mph (160 kph) updraft winds into the jet’s flight path at the time.

Ten minutes later, a cascade of problems began: Automatic messages indicate the autopilot had disengaged, a key computer system switched to alternative power, and controls needed to keep the plane stable had been damaged. An alarm sounded indicating the deterioration of flight systems.

Three minutes after that, more automatic messages reported the failure of systems to monitor air speed, altitude and direction. Control of the main flight computer and wing spoilers failed as well.

The last automatic message, at 11:14 p.m., signaled loss of cabin pressure and complete electrical failure - catastrophic events in a plane that was likely already plunging toward the ocean.

“This clearly looks like the story of the airplane coming apart,” the airline industry official told The Associated Press. “We just don’t know why it did, but that is what the investigation will show.”

French and Brazilian officials had already announced some of these details, but the more complete chronology was published Wednesday by Brazil’s O Estado de S. Paulo newspaper, citing an unidentified Air France source, and confirmed to the AP by the aviation industry source.

Air France spokesman Nicolas Petteau referred questions about the messages to the French accident investigation agency, BEA, whose spokesman Martine Del Bono said the agency won’t comment. Brazil’s Defense Minister Nelson Jobim also declined to comment, saying that the accident “investigation is being done by France; Brazil’s only responsibility is to find and pick up the pieces.”

Other experts agreed that the automatic reports of system failures on the plane strongly suggest it broke up in the air, perhaps due to fierce thunderstorms, turbulence, lightning or a catastrophic combination of events.

“These are telling us the story of the crash. They are not explaining what happened to cause the crash,” said Bill Voss, president and CEO of the Flight Safety Foundation in Alexandria, Va. “This is the documentation of the seconds when control was lost and the aircraft started to break up in air.”

Voss stressed that the messages alone were not enough to understand why the Air France jet went down, noting that the black boxes will have far more information to help determine the cause.

One fear - terrorism - was dismissed Wednesday by all three countries involved in the search and recovery effort. France’s defense minister and the Pentagon said there were no signs that terrorism was involved, and Jobim said “that possibility hasn’t even been considered.”

A U.S. Navy P-3C Orion surveillance plane, a French AWACS radar plane and two other French military planes joined Brazil’s Air Force in trying to spot debris and narrow the search zone.

Brazil’s Defense Minister Nelson Jobim said debris discovered so far was spread over a wide area, with some 230 kilometers (140 miles) separating pieces of wreckage they have spotted. The floating debris includes a 23-foot (seven-meter) chunk of plane and a 12-mile-long (20-kilometer-long) oil slick, but pilots have spotted no signs of survivors, Air Force spokesman Col. Jorge Amaral said.

“Oil stains on the water might exclude the possibility of an explosion, because there was no fire,” Defense Minister Nelson Jobim told reporters Wednesday.

The new debris was discovered about 55 miles (90 kilometers) south of where searchers a day earlier found an airplane seat, a fuel slick, an orange life vest and pieces of white debris. The original debris was found roughly 400 miles (640 kilometers) northeast of the Fernando de Noronha islands off Brazil’s northern coast, an area where the ocean floor drops as low as 22,950 feet (7,000 meters) below sea level.

Brazil lacks the equipment needed to reach the ocean floor. If the black boxes are at the bottom of the sea, their recovery will have to wait for the arrival early next week of a French research ship with remotely controlled submersibles that can explore as deeply as 19,600 feet (6,000 meters).

The sturdy black boxes - voice and data recorders - are built to give off signals for at least 30 days, even underwater, and could keep their contents indefinitely.

But the head of France’s accident investigation agency, Paul-Louis Arslanian, said in Paris that he is “not optimistic” about recovering the recorders - and that investigators should be prepared to continue the probe without them.

“It is not only deep, it is also mountainous,” he said. “We might find ourselves blocked at some point by the lack of material elements.”

Arslanian said investigators didn’t have enough information to determine whether the plane broke up in the air or upon impact with the sea, and that in the absence of black box data, they are studying maintenance and other records.

“For the moment, there is no sign that would lead us to believe that the aircraft had a problem before it took off,” Arslanian said.

He said investigators did not know the exact time of the accident or whether the chief pilot was at the controls when the plane went down. Pilots on long-haul flights often take turns at the controls to remain alert.

If no survivors are found, it would be the deadliest crash in Air France’s history, and the world’s worst civil aviation disaster since the November 2001 crash of an American Airlines jetliner in the New York City borough of Queens that killed 265 people.

Not terrorism then perhaps the US Navy shooting down another airline

BBC headlines reported in 1988 that a “US warship shoots down Iranian airliner”.

An American naval warship patrolling in the Persian Gulf has shot down an Iranian passenger jet after apparently mistaking it for an F-14 fighter. All those on board the airliner - almost 300 people - are believed dead.

The plane, an Airbus A300, was making a routine flight from Bandar Abbas, in Iran, to Dubai in the United Arab Emirates. The USS Vincennes had tracked the plane electronically and warned it to keep away. When it did not the ship fired two surface-to-air missiles, at least one of which hit the airliner.

Navy officials said the Vincennes’ crew believed they were firing at an Iranian F14 jet fighter, although they had not confirmed this visually.

This story indicated than an Airbus A330 jet was mistaken as a F14 jet fighter. Perhaps Air France Flight 447 meet the same fate because it too was an Airbus A330. The US not bad weather could be stalling efforts to find survivors. Survivors could tell the public what really happened to cause the aircraft to break apart and plunge to the ocean. An air-to-air missile could explain the strong and intense flash of white light and cause the aircraft to descend in a vertical trajectory and break up in six seconds.

Another aviation tragedy occured 2 years earlier. Trans World Airlines (TWA) Flight 800 was a scheduled international passenger flight from John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) in New York to Leonardo da Vinci Airport (FCO) in Rome, Italy, via Paris-Charles de Gaulle (CDG) in Paris, France. On July 17, 1996, at about 20:31 EDT (00:31 on July 18 UTC), the Boeing 747-131 flying the route (tail number N93119) exploded in mid-air and crashed into the Atlantic Ocean near East Moriches, New York. All 230 people on board (two pilots, two flight engineers, 14 flight attendants, 212 passengers) were killed and the aircraft was destroyed.

The NTSB investigation ended with the adoption of its final report on August 23, 2000. In it they concluded that the probable cause of the accident was an explosion of the center wing fuel tank, most likely as a result of faulty wiring. Eye witnesses reported seeing a streak of light just prior to the mid-air explosion of TWA Flight 800 but NTSB dismissed their report as being nothing more than the calculated flightpath of TWA 800 after the CWT explosion. Witnesses reported the streak before the explosion.

Still another airline downing could be attributed to being shot down. 229 people were killed in the Swiss Air 111 Crash off PEGGY’S COVE, Nova Scotia. Staff members from at least three United Nations agencies in Geneva were among the 229 dead in the crash of the Swiss Air jet off Canada on a flight known as “the U.N. shuttle,'’ U.N. officials have stated. Also on the McDonald Douglas MD-11 airliner was Jonathan Mann, renowned American expert on AIDS who once headed the World Health Organization’s fight against the disease, and his wife. A Saudi Arabian prince was also among those killed in the Swissair plane crash off Canada. The English-language Saudi Gazette quoted a Swissair source confirming that Prince Bandar Bin Saud Bin Saad Abdul Rahman al-Saud was among the 229 passengers and crew killed. The 229 people aboard Swissair Flight 111 had time to prepare for the worst while the pilots struggled vainly to keep the smoking, groaning jetliner aloft long enough for an emergency landing.

Some passengers donned their life vests during the several minutes before the MD-11 jumbo jet crashed and broke apart Wednesday night in choppy seas off Nova Scotia. The plane, which carried 137 Americans, left a slick of jet fuel, floating luggage and human remains, but no survivors.

As with the Air France Flight 447 and TWA Flight 800 crashes officials and the White House said there was no indication the crash resulted from a terrorist act.

Sixteen minutes passed between the crew’s first report of trouble - including smoke in the cockpit, in Canadian airspace at 33,000 feet - and the plane’s disappearance from radar scopes at about 8,000 feet, according to Roy Bears of the Canadian Transportation Safety Board. After the most expensive and exhaustive air-crash probe in Canadian history, investigators have failed to pinpoint the cause of a fire aboard Swissair Flight 111 that crashed off Peggys Cove, N.S., in 1999, killing all 229 people on board.

There is one common link between Air France Flight 447, TWA Flight 800 and Swiss Air Flight 111. In all 3 crashes the media immediately started reporting that an severe electrical storm may have caused the aircrafts to go down. Investigators have investigated the possibility of a lightning strike in Air France Flight 447 crash as well as the Swiss Air and the TWA crashes. Coincidence (all 3 crashes killed 229, 230 and 229 respective passengers and crew) or standard policy when the US shoots down a commercial airline?


The US Congress passed a law that allows the United States Department of Homeland Security and the NSA (National Security Agency) to read all foreign communications that passes through the US. Most people in the US and Canada think that this is only limited to wiretaps to land line phones and most are not worried because they know the government must obtain a warrant to wiretap a phone line. What most don’t know is that the US government, under George W Bush and now Obama are wiretapping without a warrant being issued - a violation of the law. What most people don’t know is that the new law was made to target digital and Internet communications including email, instant messaging, text messaging, browsing and voip (Voice over Internet Protocol) phone communications. These forms of communication are all digital communications making it very easy to store on a hard drive where they can be opened and read. What most people don’t know, both in the US and Canada, is that their Internet provider it aiding the US government in spying on you. Some are willing conspirators and others are unwittingly doing so. In Canada one of the major Internet, cellular and digital communication service provider is a company called Rogers. Rogers offers Canadians several digital services namely, cellular, text messaging, instant messaging, email, voip and Internet browsing.

This report is being posted because it is very important for every Canadian to be aware that this Canadian owned company, Rogers, is facilitating the US spying on Canadians. Research presents the fact that Rogers is diverting all Canadian email, instant messaging, text messaging, browsing and voip phone conversations to the US. Rogers has partnered with Yahoo (US owned) and all Rogers Internet communications are being sent to Yahoo servers in California. The US has found a loophole in the law that would protect our privacy through reading of our emails and internet phone conversations by “diverting” all Rogers Canadian customers’ email, instant messaging, text messaging, browsing and voip phone conversations to the US. Before our email, instant messaging, text messaging, browsing and voip phone usage didn’t go to the US if the email recipient was another Canadian address. Before the email, instant messaging, text messaging, browsing and voip phone conversations went through Canadian network junctions to get to another Canadian destination. By having Rogers host their servers with Yahoo all email, instant messaging, text messaging, browsing and voip phone conversations are sent through the US and are stored on the US servers in California. According to US law those servers are subject to US law and as such email, instant messaging, text messaging, browsing and voip phone conversations can be intercepted, opened, read, and listened in on at the digression of the DHS and the NSA. When a foreign country like the United States is intercepting our email, instant messaging, text messaging, browsing and listening in on our conversations it is a gross breach of our sovereignty and a threat to our national security.

Every one subscribing to Rogers High Speed Internet and Home Phone are now subject to the FISA bill - Canadian emails can be read and conversations can be listened in on. Rogers High Speed Internet and Home Phone service that have servers in a foreign state – the US – undermines the safety and interest of Canada and Canadian. Having servers in the US allows for the US – a foreign state – uncontrolled access to Canadian Trade Secrets. This is a very serious threat to the safety, interest, prosperity and security of Canada because the US can now intercept, block, alter, steal or delete any and all Rogers email, instant messaging, text messaging, browsing and voip phone conversations passing through the US via Rogers Yahoo servers in California USA. That is everyone including lawyers, politicians, banks, police, military, newspapers, prime minister, premiers, CSIS and every Canadian citizen with Rogers email, instant messaging, text messaging, browsing and voip phone services. The US Congress gave the Bush and Obama administration the authority to read Canadian email, instant messaging, text messaging, browsing and listen in on Rogers Home Phone conversations.

Reply from Rogers concerning emails being sent to the US:

Thank-you for your email. We strive to provide you with the highest level of customer support, and hope we can be of assistance in addressing your questions.

We understand your concern.

Rogers is a Canadian company; however, the Rogers Yahoo! Mail Servers are shared with Yahoo!, a company located in California.

If you have any further questions or comments regarding our service, please fill out the online form on our Customer Support page listed
below or contact us by phone at 1-888-288-4663.

Gigi C.
Rogers Yahoo! Hi-Speed Internet
Electronic Support Group

Customer Support:

Conspiring with a foreign country, even the US, is illegal and regarded as treason if the actions affects national security. Treason is defined as:

1) Violation of allegiance toward one’s country or sovereign, especially the betrayal of one’s country by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.
2. A betrayal of trust or confidence.

The actions of Rogers is clearly illegal. What is the Candian government doing about it? Nothing. I’ve sent emails to the prime minister, the governor general and to all the leaders of the Canadian political parties and have had no reply. Apparently they are not too concerned that the US could be reading government communications - a threat to national security.

Offence of “Communicating a Trade Secret

Every person commits an offence who, at the direction of, for the benefit of, or in association with, a foreign economic entity, fraudulently or without colour of right and to the detriment of Canada’s economic interests, international relations or national defence or national security,

(a) communicates a trade secret to another person, group or organisation; or

(b) obtains, retains, alters or destroys a trade secret.

Security of Information Act
Prejudice to the safety or interest of the State

3. (1) For the purposes of this Act, a purpose is prejudicial to the safety or interests of the State if a person

(a) commits, in Canada, an offence against the laws of Canada or a province that is punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of two years or more in order to advance a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause or to benefit a foreign entity or terrorist group;

(b) commits, inside or outside Canada, a terrorist activity;

(c) causes or aggravates an urgent and critical situation in Canada that

(i) endangers the lives, health or safety of Canadians, or

(ii) threatens the ability of the Government of Canada to preserve the sovereignty, security or territorial integrity of Canada;

(d) interferes with a service, facility, system or computer program, whether public or private, or its operation, in a manner that has significant adverse impact on the health, safety, security or economic or financial well-being of the people of Canada or the functioning of any government in Canada;

(i) impairs or threatens the capabilities of the Government of Canada in relation to security and intelligence;

(j) adversely affects the stability of the Canadian economy, the financial system or any financial market in Canada without reasonable economic or financial justification;

(k) impairs or threatens the capability of a government in Canada, or of the Bank of Canada, to protect against, or respond to, economic or financial threats or instability;

(l) impairs or threatens the capability of the Government of Canada to conduct diplomatic or consular relations, or conduct and manage international negotiations;

Canadian communications being diverted to servers in the US where they can be manipulated and abused by the US government to gain unauthorized financial, political, military or technology information is a threat to Canada’s sovereignty, prosperity and national security. Rogers is financially capable of having their servers in Canada. Why would they need to have servers in a foreign country if they have the people, technology and facilities here in Canada? Why would a Canadian company compromise our privacy and security? Is Rogers Canadian owned in name only? If so then a major breach of national security has occurred and our government must act immediately to protect Canada and Canadians.

Giving up your privacy for digital convenience

When was the last time you heard of a digital communication provider laying off people or going bankrupt? In these tough economic times the digital communication industry didn’t even suffer. Why not? Look at your digital communication bills. Compared to your old land line phone bills one can see why the digital communication industry hasn’t suffered any loose with the current economic crisis. With the old analog home land line you use to pay a small monthly service fee and you could talk to your family and friends 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a years at no extra charge - locally that is. Now that you have digital can you say the same? Can you talk 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year? With digital you are billed by the minute. Even with a monthly package you are still paying by the minute because after you’ve exceed your maximum monthly airtime minutes for your package you start paying for those additional minutes, by the minute. Shares keep going up for digital communication because you keep on paying by the minute when you can save $hundreds, even $thousands if you stayed with the analog land line phone service. To make sure you don’t drop your digital service Analog communication is intentionally being phased out with the help of your government. Government is helping out all of the digital communication service providers because digital communication can be stored and later retrieved and read whereas analog is more private and difficult to wiretap because it requires thousands of people to record the analog communication and thousands more to convert it to digital - that is after they’ve received the necessary warrant(s) to wiretap each and every communication. US law specifically prohibits anyone, including the government, from eavesdropping on an analog communication. A warrant issued by a judge is required for every land line communication wiretapping. This is the main reason why digital is being pushed upon us. But at what cost? The cost is your privacy and your rights. In exchange for digital convenience (offered at a premium) you are giving up your privacy and rights to your government.

On November 22, 1963 US Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, who had just turned thirty- eight, was eating lunch — clam chowder and tuna sandwiches — with United States Attorney Robert Morgenthau and his assistant by the pool at Hickory Hill, his Civil War-era mansion in McLean, Virginia, outside the capital. It was a perfect fall day — the kind of bright, crisp Friday afternoon that makes a weekend seem full of promise — and the grounds of the rolling green estate were afl ame with gold and red leaves from the shedding hickories, maples, and oaks that stood sentry over the property. Kennedy had just emerged from a mid- day swim, and as he talked and ate with the visiting lawmen, his trunks were still dripping.

Around 1:45 p.m., the phone extension at the other end of the pool rang. Kennedy’s wife, Ethel, picked it up — she held the receiver out to him. J. Edgar Hoover was calling. Bobby knew immediately something unusual had happened. The FBI director never phoned him at home. The two men regarded each other with a taut wariness that they both knew would only be broken when one of them left office. Each represented to the other what was wrong about America. “I have news for you,” Hoover said. “The president’s been shot.” Hoover’s voice was blunt and matter of fact. Kennedy would always remember not just the FBI chief ’s words, but his chilling tone.

“History cracked open” for America on November 22, 1963, as playwright Tony Kushner observed years later. But the abyss that opened for Bobby Kennedy at that moment was the deepest of all. And it was Hoover, of all people, who brought him news of the apocalypse. “I think he told me with pleasure,” Kennedy would recall.

Twenty minutes later, Hoover phoned again to deliver the final blow: “The president’s dead,” he said and promptly hung up. Again, Kennedy would remember, his voice was oddly flat — “not quite as excited as if he were reporting the fact that he had found a Communist on the faculty of Howard University.”

Hoover’s curt phone calls confirmed that the “perfect communion” between the two brothers, as the New York Times’ Anthony Lewis described the bond between President John Kennedy and Robert Kennedy — a fraternal relationship unprecedented in presidential history — was over. But they also clearly conveyed that Bobby had suffered a death of a different kind. His own power as attorney general instantly started to fade, already to a point where the director of the FBI no longer felt compelled to show deference, or even common human grace, to his superior in the Justice Department.

For the rest of the day and night, Bobby Kennedy would wrestle with his howling grief — crying, or fighting against crying since that was the Kennedy way — while using whatever power was still left him, before the new administration settled firmly into place, to figure out what had really happened in Dallas. He worked the phones at Hickory Hill; he met with a succession of people while waiting for Air Force One to return with the body of his brother, his brother’s widow, and the new president; he accompanied his brother’s remains to the autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital; and he stayed coiled and awake in the White House until early the next morning. Lit up with the clarity of shock, the electricity of adrenaline, he constructed the outlines of the crime.

From his phone calls and conversations that day — and into the following week — it’s possible to trace the paths that Robert Kennedy pursued as he tried to unveil the mystery. “With that amazing computer brain of his, he put it all together on the afternoon of November 22,” his friend, journalist Jack Newfi eld, remarked.

RFK’s search for the truth about the crime of the century has long been an untold story. But it is deeply loaded with historic significance. Kennedy’s investigative odyssey — which began with a frantic zeal immediately after his brother’s assassination, and then secretly continued in fitful bursts until his own murder less than five years later — did not succeed in bringing the case to court. But Robert Kennedy was a central figure in the drama — not only as his brother’s attorney general and the second most powerful official in the Kennedy administration, but as JFK’s principal emissary to the dark side of American power. And his hunt for the truth sheds a cold, bright light on the forces that he suspected were behind the murder of his brother. Bobby Kennedy was America’s fi rst assassination conspiracy theorist.

Predictably, the first phone call that Bobby made on November 22 after his initial conversation with Hoover was to Kenny O’Donnell. JFK’s chief of staff had accompanied the president to Dallas and was with him at Parkland Memorial Hospital when he was pronounced dead at 2:00 p.m. Tough, taciturn, Boston Irish, O’Donnell was second only to Bobby himself in his political guardianship of the president. A close friend since they roomed together at Harvard and played on the college football team, O’Donnell was the man Bobby would have wanted at the scene of a crisis if he couldn’t be there himself. As a B-17 bombardier, he had fl own thirty missions against Nazi Germany, was shot down and then escaped from enemy prison. In his final, legendary game as quarterback at Harvard, he ran for the winning touchdown against archrival Yale on a broken leg.

Bobby ran upstairs to phone O’Donnell from his bedroom, while Morgenthau and his assistant were led to a TV set in the drawing room at Hickory Hill. Not finding O’Donnell at the hospital, Kennedy spoke instead to Secret Service agent Clint Hill, the only offi cer who had performed heroically on the president’s behalf that afternoon. Images of Hill rushing to leap onto the back of JFK’s moving limousine would forever become part of the iconography of that eerie day.

It’s not known precisely what Bobby learned that afternoon from the Secret Service man. But there was a darkness that immediately began growing in Hill and O’Donnell about what they’d seen and heard in Dallas. Neither man would ever be the same after November 22.

O’Donnell was riding immediately behind Kennedy’s limousine in the Dallas motorcade, just ten feet away, along with fellow Boston Irishman Dave Powers, the White House aide and court jester. They were front row witnesses to the assassination. Powers would later say it felt as if they were “riding into an ambush.” O’Donnell and more than one Secret Service man would tell Bobby the same thing that day: They were caught in a crossfire. It was a conspiracy.

Bobby Kennedy came to the same conclusion that afternoon. It was not a “he” who had killed his brother — it was a “they.” This is how he put it to his friend, Justice Department press spokesman Edwin Guthman. The former Pulitzer Prize-winning Seattle Times reporter had become close friends with Kennedy during the 1950s when they both put themselves on the line to investigate corruption and thuggery in the Teamsters’ union. Guthman was one of Bobby’s “band of brothers,” as the attorney general years later inscribed a picture of his young, idealistic Justice Department team. The battle cry from Shakespeare’s Henry V appealed to Bobby’s sense of heroic mission: “We few, we happy few, we band of brothers / For he to-day that sheds his blood with me / Shall be my brother…/ And gentlemen…now a- bed / Shall think themselves accursed they were not here.” If the perfect communion between Jack and Bobby was at the heart of the Kennedy administration, it was this wider circle of brothers — all intensely devoted to the Kennedy cause — who gave the New Frontier its blood and muscle. Bobby would quietly turn to several of these trusted aides to help him on his quest for the truth.

Guthman was having lunch with a congressman from Seattle on Capitol Hill when someone came rushing in to tell them the president had been shot. He immediately drove to Hickory Hill, where he spent the rest of the afternoon with Bobby. By now, Kennedy family members were gathering at the Virginia estate. But Bobby was also surrounding himself with “brothers” like Guthman. The two men paced endlessly together, back and forth on the backyard lawn. “There’s so much bitterness I thought they would get one of us, but Jack, after all he’d been through, never worried about it,” Kennedy told Guthman.

“Bob said, ‘I thought they would get me, instead of the president,’ ” Guthman said, recalling the conversation years later. “He distinctly said ‘they.’”

Guthman and others around Bobby that day thought “they” might be coming for the younger Kennedy next. So apparently did Bobby. He was normally opposed to tight security measures, which he found intrusive and perhaps even a sign of cowardice — “Kennedys don’t need bodyguards,” he had said, even after he began receiving death threats as the crime-busting attorney general. But that afternoon, Kennedy allowed the Fairfax County police, who rushed to Hickory Hill after the assassination without being summoned, to protect his home. Later, the police were replaced by federal marshals, who encircled Kennedy’s estate after Guthman and other RFK aides spoke to Chief U.S. Marshal Jim McShane.

Bobby trusted McShane and his men. James Joseph Patrick McShane was a street-tough Irish New York cop. He had worked with Bobby as an investigator for the Senate Rackets Committee in the late 1950s and had served as bodyguard for JFK during the presidential campaign. He and his men had put their lives on the line in the civil rights battles of the South, saving Martin Luther King Jr. from a howling mob that had surrounded a church in Montgomery, Alabama, where he was preaching in May 1961. The following year, McShane and his ragtag troops had again formed a thin, bloodied line in defense of James Meredith, the black student who set off a fiery white uprising when he enrolled at the University of Mississippi. McShane was “built like a tank, had the crushed nose of the Golden Gloves boxing champ he once was, and the puffy face of a man who enjoyed booze in his off-hours,” observed one chronicler of his exploits. As a New York cop, he had survived seven shoot- outs on the streets and received the NYPD’s medal of honor.

It’s telling that Bobby turned to McShane and his band of federal irregulars in his hour of dread, and not Hoover’s more professional G-men. Even when his brother was still alive, Bobby had learned that Hoover’s men could not be trusted in the administration’s most dire showdowns, like those in the South. Nor did he turn to the Secret Service for protection that day. He was already trying to fi gure out why the agency entrusted with the president’s personal safety had failed his brother.

With their youth, ambition, and deep sense of family entitlement, the Kennedys had come into offi ce confi dent they could take charge of the federal government and put it at the service of their cause. But on November 22, Bobby Kennedy immediately suspected something had broken inside the government and that his brother had been cut down by one of its jagged shards. In these hours of unknown danger, Bobby followed his old tribal instincts, turning not to the appropriate government agencies, but to the tight band of brothers whom the Kennedys had always most relied upon. None of the intensely loyal men gathered around Kennedy at his home that day knew if Bobby’s life too was now in danger. Nor did they know for certain in these fearful hours where the threat might come from or on whom they could depend. But they were sure that they could count on Jim McShane and his men to give their lives for the surviving Kennedy. He was one of them.

While McShane’s marshals staked out the front gate at Hickory Hill and fanned out along the perimeters of the estate, Bobby worked to put faces to the conspiracy that he suspected was behind his brother’s death — to find out who “they” were. No one knew more about the dark tensions within the Kennedy administration than he did. As President Kennedy struggled to command his government, clashing with hard-liners in his national security bureaucracy, he had given more and more responsibility to his brother Bobby. Among the items in the attorney general’s bulging portfolio were the CIA, which the Kennedys were determined to overhaul after the agency led them into the Bay of Pigs disaster; the Mafi a, which Bobby had declared war on, telling his fellow Justice Department crusaders that either they would succeed or the mob would run the country; and Cuba, the island nation around which raged so much Cold War sound and fury. When it came to administration policy on Cuba, Bobby was “president,” General Alexander Haig, one of the Pentagon’s point men on the issue, would later say.

The CIA, Mafia, and Cuba — Bobby knew they were intertwined. The CIA had formed a sinister alliance with underworld bosses to assassinate Fidel Castro, working with mob-connected Cuban exile leaders. Bobby thought he had severed the CIA-Mafia merger when the agency finally told him about it in May 1962. But he also knew the agency often defied higher authority. He would later describe CIA actions during the Bay of Pigs as “virtually treason.” It was this shadowy nexus — the CIA, Mafia, and Cuban exiles — that Kennedy immediately focused on during the afternoon of November 22.

After phoning Dallas, Kennedy made a call to CIA headquarters, just down the highway in Langley, Virginia, where he often began his day, stopping there to work on Cuba- related business and trying to establish control over the agency’s “wilderness of mirrors” for his brother. Bobby’s phone call to Langley on the afternoon of November 22 was a stunning outburst. Getting a ranking offi cial on the phone — whose identity is still unknown — Kennedy confronted him in a voice vibrating with fury and pain. “Did your outfit have anything to do with this horror?” Kennedy erupted. Whatever the anonymous CIA official told Bobby that afternoon, it did not put his suspicions about the agency to rest.

Later that day, Kennedy would take his question to the top of the CIA. John McCone, director of the agency, who was eating lunch in his Langley office when his aide Walter Elder burst in to tell him the news from Dallas. McCone immediately phoned Bobby, who told him to come right over to the house in McLean. McCone later recalled that he was with Bobby and Ethel in their second-floor library when Kennedy received the call telling him his brother was dead. “There was almost nothing we could say to one another,” recalled McCone. “We were seized with the horror of it.”

After he called his mother, Rose, and brother, Teddy, to tell them Jack was gone, a “steely” Bobby (as McCone described him) took the CIA chief outside to the backyard and engaged him in a remarkable conversation that would extend, off and on, for three hours that afternoon. The attorney general of the United States wanted to know whether the country’s intelligence agency had assassinated the president of the United States. Bobby would later tell a close friend, “You know, at the time I asked McCone…if they had killed my brother, and I asked him in a way that he couldn’t lie to me, and they hadn’t.”

Bobby’s remarks about his conversation with McCone have caused intense speculation. McCone, a fellow Catholic, shared a deep sense of faith with Bobby, as well as with Ethel, both of whom had consoled him after the death of his first wife. He once took a rosary ring that he carried around in his billfold for comfort to Rome, where he had a copy made and had it blessed by the pope as a gift for Bobby. Perhaps Kennedy made McCone swear to tell him the truth, as one devout Catholic to another.

In the days following the assassination, McCone would come to conclude that there had been two shooters in Dallas, in striking contrast to the official version of the crime as the work of a lone gunman, which was being ardently promoted by Hoover and the FBI. But there is no evidence that he ever came to suspect his own agency.

Bobby accepted McCone’s assurance about the CIA that afternoon. But he also knew that McCone, a wealthy Republican businessman from California with no intelligence background, was not in firm control of his own agency. Kennedy himself knew more about the spy outfit’s sinister exploits, including the Mafi a plots, than McCone did. His brother had replaced the CIA’s legendary creator, Allen Dulles, with McCone after the agency’s spectacular failure at the Bay of Pigs. But McCone never worked his way into the agency’s old boy network that dated back to its origins in the OSS during World War II. And there was a sense he preferred to be left in the dark on the more unpleasant stuff, that his religious principles would not countenance some of the agency’s black arts. Bobby would realize that while he had taken his question to the very top of the CIA, he had asked the wrong man.

The young attorney general had built his reputation, before and after coming to the Justice Department, on a relentless crusade to crush the power of organized crime in America, which he felt was threatening to take control of the country’s economy through corrupt labor unions like Jimmy Hoffa’s Teamsters as well as local, state, and federal government through payoffs to politicians, judges, and elected officials. While Hoover was still focusing on the empty shell of the Communist Party USA as public enemy number one, RFK was convinced that the true “enemy within” was a corporate underworld that was gaining the power to overshadow the country’s legitimate democratic institutions. “Of course it’s a different era now, maybe terrorism is a greater threat these days than organized crime,” said Guthman recently, sitting in his cramped office at the USC Annenberg School of Journalism, where he still lectures. “But if you look at what has happened in South and Central America, you can see Bob was right to worry about organized crime taking over our country. Where would we be if he hadn’t recognized the power and importance of the Mafia and the rackets? This was a time when the chief of the FBI, Hoover, was saying there was no such thing as organized crime.”


US government official says Obama sent US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to China on the weekend to beg China for a bailout. GM hadn’t filed for bankruptcy until Monday morning and Obama was already offering Hummer to China as a down payment for China to provide the US government with desperately needed bailout funding. Last Monday Obama stated the obvious in an interview, the US is broke. In a interview with C-SPAN, President Obama boldly told Americans: “We are out of money.” Obama needed to force GM into bankruptcy because a lot of secret deals have already been made using the assets of GM. Obama forced GM to take more US tax dollars so that Obama can illegally take 60% controlling share of GM. Countries like China are demanding payment in real assets rather than the usually now worthless US dollars. The Hummer deal with China is secret because Obama illegally gave Hummer to China before GM filed for bankruptcy.

Chinese President Hu Jintao meet with visiting US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on Tuesday to iron the Hummer deal in exchange for Beijing’s pledge to work with Washington to provide funding to the US to battle the US financial crisis. China has two types of money at its disposal – high domestic savings, which could be pumped into its own economy, and a huge trade surplus, which could be used to lend money to the needy – such as the United States and Europe.

Geithner met with Hu and Prime Minister Wen Jiabao on the final day of a whirlwind visit aimed at getting desperately need cash from China. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was sent by Obama to reassure Beijing that its massive investment in US bonds is safe. Hummer was offered as a guarantee for China’s purchasing of more US debt.

China has almost $800 billion dollars in US debts. As the largest holder of US Treasury bills, which are crucial to funding Washington’s multi-trillion-dollar recovery plans, China has expressed concerns that its investment is at grave risk. Geithner sent to reassure Chinese leaders, saying their money is “very safe” despite a ballooning US budget deficit, which he pledged to cut.

China’s state media however expressed opposition to Beijing’s policy of buying massive amounts of US debt, saying the value of China’s assets could be battered as the financial crisis continues. According to an online poll, 87 percent of respondents considered China’s dollar assets unsafe, the Global Times reported. “Ordinary Chinese people are discontent with the declining value of China’s huge foreign exchange reserves denominated in US dollars,” the paper said. “It will be regrettable if he (Geithner) underestimates and shuts his ears to voices from China’s civil society,” it said in an editorial.

The Hummer deal will only buy Obama a little more time as the US national debt makes it virtually impossible for the US to ever recover from the US crisis that was orchestrated by the US own government. Since Obama was elected president in November 2008 the US National has skyrocketed as a result of uncontrolled spending by Obama and his administration. The US people don’t know just how grave the financial crisis is. Obama didn’t even bother to tell the American people that his administration has lost $9 trillion, all through the New York Federal Reserve - where US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was previously the president of.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) recently released a “preliminary analysis of the President’s budget”, and the outlook is not pretty.
The CBO estimated that the “cumulative deficit from 2010 to 2019 under the President’s proposals would total $9.3 trillion dollars”, and that the debt held by the public would rise to 82% of GDP by 2019.

The CBO estimates that the total national debt will be $17.27 trillion dollars by 2019 under the proposed Obama budget, while the GDP will be just under $21 trillion dollars.

Obama has spent more money than any president or group of presidents, in fact he spent more than ALL presidents together and he did it in less than a month in office.


Consumer advocate Ralph Nader yesterday issued the following statement on GM’s bankruptcy filing: Today’s bankruptcy declaration in federal court by General Motors is an avoidable, crude weapon of mass devastation for workers, dealers, auto suppliers, small businesses and their depleted communities. For GM’s voiceless owners — the common shareholders — it is a wipeout.

The proximate cause of the bankruptcy was supposed to be the inability of GM and the government’s auto task force to reach an accommodation with GM’s bondholders. But late last week, the bondholder problem was moving toward rapid resolution, and was clearly resolvable. Why then are GM and its multibillion government financier proceeding with bankruptcy?

The bankruptcy and the GM restructuring plan are the product of a secretive, unaccountable, Wall Street-minded government task force that assumed power because of a Congressional abdication of historic magnitude. By all rights, the restructuring plan should have been submitted to Congress for deliberative review and decision.

There is little doubt that GM’s chronic mismanagement and the deep recession require restructuring and scaling back the auto giant. But the bankruptcy and restructuring plan appear poised to do so in ways that will needlessly harm the stakeholders meant to be helped by Washington’s rescue of GM?

Many, many jobs will be lost that could be preserved. There is reason to question whether too many plants and brands are being closed — a matter that should have been taken up in Congress. Just the closing of hundreds of (GM and Chrysler) dealerships will cost more than 100,000 jobs. These sacrificed jobs will fray communities and impose enormous expenses on government entities that will have to provide unemployment and social relief, while suffering lost tax revenues.

The unionized workforce will see the wage and benefit structure slashed — even though auto manufacturer wages make up less than 10 percent of the cost of a car — so that new jobs at GM will no longer be a ticket to the middle class. This will drag down the wage structure of the entire auto industry — exactly the wrong direction for the country.

America’s manufacturing base will be further eroded, as GM pursues its Grand China Strategy — increasing manufacturing outside of the United States, and increasingly from China, for import back into the United States. Unanswered questions persist about how GM’s valuable operations in China, and unrepatriated profits, will be treated in bankruptcy, or excluded from bankruptcy.

Victims of defective GM products may find themselves with no legal avenue to pursue justice. In the Chrysler bankruptcy, with complete disregard for the real human lives involved, the Obama task force and auto company have maneuvered effectively to extinguish the product liability claims of victims of defective cars.

In a worst case scenario for the GM bankruptcy — involving an extended court proceeding or severe impairment of consumer confidence in the GM brand — all of these problems will be magnified. Again, given the path to resolution with the bondholders, this is an avoidable gamble.

The GM/task force bankruptcy plans appear geared to saving the General Motors entity — but at a harsh and often avoidable cost to workers, communities, suppliers, consumers, dealers, and the nation’s manufacturing capacity. It will also prove to be a complex political nightmare for President Obama.

With the company entering bankruptcy, the next challenge will be to ensure that the government exercises its ownership rights to undo and mitigate, to the extent possible, these damages. Among other measures, this should involve revisiting the serious drag-down, concessionary wage terms imposed on the United Auto Workers; demanding a moratorium on GM’s outsourcing of production of cars for sale in the United States; and establishing successorship liability for the new GM, so that victims of dangerous and defective GM cars can have their day in court.

SOURCE Ralph Nader, Consumer Advocate

Die-cast and radio-control Hummer H2 toy manufactured by Maisto

General Motors Corp. said Tuesday that it has signed a deal to sell its Hummer truck unit, just one day after filing for bankruptcy.

But GM (GM, Fortune 500) would not identify the buyer nor name a price, saying only that the deal would close by the end of September. GM had revealed in April that it was courting three serious offers for the Hummer brand.

“I’m confident that Hummer will thrive globally under its new ownership,” said Troy Clarke, president of GM North America, in a press release. “And for GM, this sale continues to accelerate the reinvention of GM into a leaner, more focused, and more cost-competitive automaker.”

As part of the deal, some GM plants will continue to build the Hummer brand for the new owner, at least for a while. The company said its Shreveport, La. plant will keep building Hummers for the new owner until at least 2010.

GM also said that the deal should protect more than 3,000 jobs in manufacturing and engineering, and at dealerships “around the country.”

It is being reported that die-cast and radio-control toy manufacturer Maisto is the cash buyer. Maisto plans on making the leap from manufacturing a wide variety of HUMMER toys and models to manufacturing full-size vehicles. The company announced that it has agreed to acquire the HUMMER division of General Motors Corporation.

Financial terms were not released. But Dewey Cheatem, the senior director of mergers and acquisitions at Maisto, said in an interview with CFN News that the Fontana, Calif.-based company has agreed to pay all cash for HUMMER.

Privately held Maisto is making the leap from manufacturing a wide variety of HUMMER toys and models to the real thing. “It’s really very simple,” said chief designer George Tirebiter, “we already have HUMMER tooling in 1:14, 1:16 and other scales — all we need to do is scale them up to 1:1 size and we’ll have the most powerful and lightest weight SUVs on the planet.” He is confident that Maisto will be able to build the HUMMER H3T, for example, at only a fraction of the weight and cost of the current ones. The 1:16 Maisto R/C toy weighs about two pounds so multiplied by 16 to the full size it would tip the scales at 32 pounds. With its electric drive it should accelerate to 60 mph in about three seconds.

Distribution will change also. Deals are already in place for major “big box” stores already selling Maisto models to carry the new full-size vehicles as well. Production is expected to begin this summer with the 1:1 items in stock this October.

George W Bush and members of the US Congress and US Senate violated US law when Bush signed the USA Patriot Act.

A bill of attainder (also known as an act or writ of attainder) is an act of the legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a trial. The United States Constitution forbids both the federal and state governments to enact bills of attainder, in Article 1, Sections 9 and 10, respectively. It was considered an excess or abuse of the British monarchy and Parliament. No bills of attainder have been passed since 1798, that is until 2001. The Bush administration illegally passed a bill of attainder when they drew up and made law the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act is the US government usurping the law by declaring unjustly and unlawfully a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a trial.

The provision in the United States Constitution forbiding both the federal and state governments from enacting bills of attainder reflects the importance that the framers attached to this issue, since the unamended constitution imposes very few restrictions on state governments’ power.

Within the U.S. Constitution, the clauses forbidding attainder laws serve two purposes. First, they reinforced the separation of powers, by forbidding the legislature to perform judicial functions—since the outcome of any such acts of legislature would of necessity take the form of a bill of attainder. Second, they embody the concept of due process, which was later reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9; Clause 3 is “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed”. The constitution of every State also expressly forbids bills of attainder. For example, Wisconsin’s constitution Article I, Section 12 reads:

No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.

Contrast this with the subtly more modern variation of the Texas version: Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws: Impairing Obligation of Contracts: “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made”.

The precedent that best reflects most of the original intention of the mandates is from Cummings v. Missouri.[9] It states

A bill of attainder, is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without judicial trial and includes any legislative act which takes away the life, liberty or property of a particular named or easily ascertainable person or group of persons because the legislature thinks them guilty of conduct which deserves punishment.

The stated purpose of the USA Patriot Act is to “deter and punish American terrorists in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes.” One criticism of the Act is that “other purposes” often includes the detection and prosecution of non-terrorist alleged future crimes.

2007 US Justice Department audit finds FBI abuse of PATRIOT act powers

On March 9, 2007, a Justice Department audit found that the FBI had “improperly and, in some cases, illegally used the USA PATRIOT Act to secretly obtain personal information” about United States citizens. The Guardian

On June 15, 2007, following an internal audit finding that FBI agents abused the USA PATRIOT Act power more than 1000 times, U.S. District Judge John D. Bates ordered the agency to begin turning over thousands of pages of documents related to the agency’s national security letters program. First Amendment Center

Dismissal of United States Attorneys

Seven United States Attorneys were dismissed by the United States Department of Justice on December 7, 2006. Senior members of the White House and the Department of Justice participated in compiling the a list of dismisees. Plan for Replacing Certain United States Attorneys . Attached to email from Kyle Sampson to William W. Mercer, December 5, 2006.] The USA Patriot Act Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005, which was signed into law on March 9, 2006, extinguished the former 120-day term limit of interim United States Attorneys appointed to fill vacated offices. This in effect gave the U.S. Attorney General greater appointing authority than the president, since the interim U.S. attorneys did not need Senate confirmation, and the presidential nominees do. (An interim U.S. attorney’s term expires upon the confirmation and swearing in of a presidentially appointed U.S. attorney, if one is put forward.cite news | author=Marisa Taylor and Greg Gordon New U.S. attorneys come from Bush’s inner circle Critics have claimed the dismissals were either motivated by desire to install attorneys more loyal to the Republican party or as retribution for actions or inactions damaging to the Republican party. At least six of the eight had positive internal Justice Department performance reports. [cite news | Reviews of 6 fired attorneys positive

A bill, S-214, filed in January 2007, to rescind the no-term-limit interim U.S. attorney provision was approved by very large majorities in both the Senate and the House, and was signed into law by the President on June 14, 2007, designated Public Law No: 110-34 and called the “Preserving United States Attorney Independence Act of 2007.” l A bill to amend chapter 35 of title 28, United States Code, to preserve the independence of United States attorneys. (S.214 & H.R.580) “THOMAS” (Library of Congress). Retrieved June 20, 2007.) The new law also specifies that all Attorney General-appointed interim attorneys then in office on shall have a term that ends 120 days from the signing of the bill. As of June 14, 2007, the Department of Justice has more than twenty United States attorney positions that are not presidential appointees, which are filled by either “acting” US attorneys (held by civil service “first U.S. attorneys”) or “interim” U.S. attorneys appointed by the Attorney general. (Terms of district court-appointed interim US attorneys were unaffected by the new law–there was at least one: Paula D. Silsby of Maine, appointed in 2001.)]

Wrongful accusations under the Act

FBI agents used a USA PATRIOT Act “sneak and peek” search to secretly examine the home of Brandon Mayfield, who was wrongfully jailed for two weeks on suspicion of involvement in the Madrid train bombings. Agents seized three hard drives and ten DNA samples preserved on cotton swabs, and took 335 photos of personal items. Mayfield has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government, contending that his rights were violated by his arrest and by the investigation against him. He also contends the USA PATRIOT Act is unconstitutional. Register Guard

Blanket requests for financial information on visitors to Las Vegas

In November 2005, “Business Week” reported that the FBI had issued tens of thousands of “National Security Letters” and had obtained one million financial records from the customers of targeted Las Vegas businesses. Selected businesses included casinos, storage warehouses and car rental agencies. An anonymous Justice official claimed that such requests were permitted under section 505 of the USA PATRIOT Act and despite the volume of requests insisted “We are not inclined to ask courts to endorse fishing expeditions”. Business Week November 2005 This didn’t just include financial records, but credit records, employment records, and in some cases, health records.

Furthermore, this information is databased and maintained indefinitely by the FBI. Previous legislation required that federal law enforcement destroy any records harvested during an investigation that pertained to anyone deemed innocent. The Patriot Act superseded that and now the records are maintained indefinitely. According to the legislation, they may be “shared with third-parties where appropriate” yet no where in the legislation does it define who these third parties are or what conditions would be deemed appropriate for the sharing of such records.

The large scale wiretapping and tracing of calls to and from foreign countries also falls under this. Millions of phone records were harvested, fed into a database and were searched for patterns of calling to and from numbers of known terrorists. To date, there have been no announced arrests from this program.

Public libraries have been asked to turn over their records for specific terminals. A few have filed suit, because the National Security Letters that they were presented with were very sweeping, demanding information not just on the individual under investigation, but on everyone who had used specific terminals at the libraries during given time windows. Since many of the users in one case were minor children, one library felt that it had an obligation to notify the parents. The FBI has disagreed and the case is now working its way through the court system.

A National Security Letter can be issued by any FBI agent with the rank of Field Supervisor or above, at their discretion. It does not require a judge or probable cause, as does a search warrant.

As of June 1, 2009 Obama has ordered you to show “Your papers please”. When asked for your papers hand Obama, his state police and border guards the US Constitution

When the people of the United States went to bed last night they probably didn’t think that they’d be waking up in a United Socialist State. As of June 1, 2009 Barack Hussein Obama has official made the US a socialist state. It is just a matter of time before Obama passes legislation for the US to be referred to as the USS - United Socialist States. A non-American managed to fool the United States people into electing him as their leader. They were tricked into believing he was a true American, which he isn’t. They were tricked into believing he was the man of change, but the change he has to offer is ruling them like a self-proclaimed king. He is the Trojan Horse sent to destroy the the mighty US. He offered himself as a gift to the US people, and they brought him in. When the US people were asleep he attacked.

According to Marxism-Leninism, socialism is a stage of social and economic development that will replace capitalism, and will in turn be replaced by communism. Thus, in Marxist-Leninist terms, a socialist state is a state that has abolished capitalism and is moving towards communism. There are several key social and economic changes that officially went in effect June 1, 2009, all under the dictatorial rule of of Barack Hussein Obama.

State ownership

On June 1, 2009 the government under Barack Obama has officially taken control of one of the largest working class companies in the former US - GM. General Motors was forced into bankruptcy by Barack Obama. Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection was sought by GM but Obama made it so that they could not apply for it. Obama’s plan was to take over GM and liquidate it immediately under a new name, under state control. Obama has violated US law in his hostile takeover of US car maker giant GM. Chapter 11 is a chapter of the United States Bankruptcy Code, which permits reorganization under the bankruptcy laws of the United States. Chapter 11 bankruptcy is available to every business, whether organized as a corporation or sole proprietorship, and to individuals, although it is most prominently used by corporate entities.

Chapter 11 is reorganization, as opposed to liquidation. Debtors may “emerge” from a Chapter 11 bankruptcy within a few months or within several years, depending on the size and complexity of the bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Code accomplishes this objective through the use of a bankruptcy plan. With some exceptions, the plan may be proposed by any party in interest. Interested creditors then vote for a plan. Upon its confirmation, the plan becomes binding and identifies the treatment of debts and operations of the business for the duration of the plan.

Debtors (GM) in Chapter 11 have the exclusive right to propose a plan of reorganization for a period of time (in most cases 120 days). After that time has elapsed, creditors may also propose plans. Plans must satisfy a number of criteria in order to be “confirmed” by the bankruptcy court. Among other things, creditors must vote to approve the plan of reorganization. If a plan cannot be confirmed, the court may either convert the case to a liquidation under Chapter 7, or, if in the best interests of the creditors and the estate, the case may be dismissed resulting in a return to the status quo before bankruptcy.

With Obama’s hostile takeover of GM Obama dictated his plan instead of obtaining the required voting on a plan and having it confirmed by vote, not by demand. As with other forms of bankruptcy, petitions filed under Chapter 11 invoke the automatic stay. The automatic stay requires all creditors to cease collection attempts, and makes post-petition debt collection void. Debtors are also protected from other litigation against the business through the imposition of an automatic stay. GM is protected by US law from the Obama government. Obama must cease any and all collection attempts. Obama cannot dictate or orchestrate any takeover of GM. As a creditor, the US government with Obama as president cannot make any post-petition debt collection demands nor can he declare controlling ownership of GM. Under US law GM must be allowed time to reorganize their company void of any interference or credit demands by it creditors - including the largest creditor, the Obama government.

Separation of Power deliberately usurped by Obama

Obama decision to force GM into bankruptcy and assume without merit control of it is also a clear and deliberate violation of US law - the US Constitution, in regards to separation of power. Separation of powers is the political doctrine under which the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government are kept distinct, to prevent abuse of power. This U.S. form of separation of powers is sometimes also known as checks and balances. Obama has been handing out US tax dollars to his campaign donor banks and for hostile takeovers of major US companies, all assumed under executive jurisdiction but which clearly lies to the US Congress.

Congress has the sole power to legislate for the United States. Under the nondelegation doctrine, Congress may not delegate its lawmaking responsibilities to any other agency. In this vein, the Supreme Court held in the 1998 case Clinton v. City of New York that Congress could not delegate a “line-item veto” to the President, by which he was empowered to selectively nullify certain provisions of a bill before signing it. The Constitution Article I, Section 8; says to give all the Power to Congress. Congress has the exclusive power to legislate, to make laws and in addition to the enumerated powers it has all other powers vested in the government by the Constitution.

The President has the responsibility to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution and the Laws of the United States in much the same way as a vassal takes an oath of allegiance to his liege lord. He is delegated authority by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, but the Congress can never give its power away.

Executive power is vested in the President by Congress with the advice and consent of the Senate so that he may preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and the laws of the United States. The principal responsibility of the President is to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” By using these words, the Constitution does not require the President to personally enforce the law; rather, officers subordinate to the President may perform such duties. The Constitution, empowers the President to ensure the faithful execution of the laws made by Congress. Congress may itself terminate such appointments, by impeachment, and restrict the President. The President’s responsibility is to execute whatever instructions he is given by the Congress.

Obama forced Chief Justice to resign in violation of US law

Judicial power — the power to decide cases and controversies—is vested in the Supreme Court and inferior courts established by Congress. The judges must be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, hold office for life and receive compensations that may not be diminished during their continuance in office. If a court’s judges do not have such attributes, the court may not exercise the judicial power of the United States. Courts exercising the judicial power are called “constitutional courts.”

United States Supreme Court Justice David Souter was forced to resign by US president Barack Hussein Obama over his refusing an order to support the planned implementation of Martial Law within the US. Obama sole job is to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and the laws of the United States. Obama usurped the US Constitution and forced David Souter to resign after Souter made it clear to Obama that he (Obama) could not force he (Souter) or any other Supreme Court Justice to comply with the presidents demands. Souter was illegally forced to resign because the US law clearly states that the judges are judges for life - “hold office for life”. Obama demanded that the Supreme court judges violate their duties to the law by suspending the US people’s inalienable right to counsel as granted to them with the United States Constitution’s Sixth Amendment. Obama demanded the Supreme Court overturn a long-standing ruling that stopped police from initiating questions unless a defendant’s lawyer was present, a move that will make it easier for prosecutors to interrogate suspects.

Obama had the high court, in a 5-4 ruling, illegally overturn the 1986 Michigan v. Jackson ruling, which said police may not initiate questioning of a defendant who has a lawyer or has asked for one unless the attorney is present. The Michigan ruling applied even to defendants who agreed to talk to the authorities without their lawyers. Justice John Paul Stevens, Justices David Souter, Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg refused to concur with the clear usurpation, abrogation and suspension of the Constitution by Obama.

For Obama to dismiss United States Supreme Court Justice David Souter is a clear violation of US law - separation of executive and judicial powers have been breached by Obama. Souter cannot be forced to resign. Once appointed the job of Supreme Court Judge is for life. Obama’s pick to replace Souter cannot be legally confirmed by the US Congress. Obama actions are in violation of US law concerning the separation of power and the US Congress cannot give its power to Obama or any other president.

Border checkpoints go into effect June 1, 2009

As of June 1, 2009 the entire US border is a checkpoint whereby anyone, including US citizens, must show their papers to enter the new United Socialist State. The Obama government is now enforcing new passport requirements for all travelers entering or re-entering the United States from Canada, Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and Bermuda. Beginning June 1, 2009, all persons entering or re-entering the USA by air, land or sea will need acceptable ID. This may be a passport, passport card, enhanced driver’s license or a CBP-issued NEXUS (Canada), SENTRI (Mexico) or FAST (trucks) card. Air travelers must have a valid passport. US citizens and foreigners alike must now “show papers” to enter or re-enter the US. The US Supreme Court has consistently ruled that checkpoints are unconstitutional.

The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protect citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures unless an officer has probable cause. Police road blocks and border crossing checkpoints where you are required to show your “papers” are the antithesis of probable cause. In 1990 the Supreme Court of Michigan ruled that, under the Fourth Amendment, police checkpoints were unconstitutional. .”

Dozens of lawsuits and millions of Americans want Barack Obama to prove he’s constitutionally qualified to be president. People of the United States see Obama for who he really is. His usurpation of US law have not gone unnoticed. On April 15, 2009 the people legally and peacefully assembled across the US to petitioned Obama to change his illegal ways or resign. They knew he was abusing his authority as president of the United Stated by deliberately usurping the United States Constitution. With Barack Obama in the White House, millions of Americans are watching the news night after night in sheer shock, wondering out loud what the next unprecedented expansion of government power will be. Nationalizing entire industries with gigantic taxpayer bailouts; forcing taxpayers to fund abortion; rapidly converting free-market, capitalist America into a government-run socialist state every day seems to bring a new unconstitutional power-grab, critics say.

But arguably Obama’s most egregious, unconstitutional power-grab as president may have been his very first being elected to the highest office in the land while steadfastly refusing to offer proof he is a natural born citizen, as required of all presidents by the U.S. Constitution.

What is all this for? Its to transform the US from a democratic states to a socialist state. The proof is there, you just have to open your eyes and see it. The constant presence of police; the insistence upon showing “your papers”; the awareness that neither your person nor home is immune from state searches or seizures; the disappearance of people into unknown prison camps; neighbors spying upon neighbors, and children betraying their parents to the state; and the domination of society by a military and bureaucratic arrogance, arbitrariness, and absolutism.

The US Constiution is your defense against Obama

1st Amendment - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

2nd Amendment - A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

3rd Amendment - No soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner; nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

4th Amendment - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.

5th Amendment - No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous, crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service, in time of war, or public danger; nor shall any person be subject, for the same offense, to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself; nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

6th Amendment - In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law; and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

7th Amendment - In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved; and no fact, tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re- examined in any court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law.

8th Amendment - Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted.

9th Amendment - The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

10th Amendment - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

11th Amendment - The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another State or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state.