What the majority of people do not know is that not only are flu vaccines and antidotes nearly useless in preventing flu, they will cause the flu, and they often result in nervous system damage that can take years for the body to repair.

According to a CDC report of the 1994-1995 flu season, 87 percent of type A influenza virus samples were not similar to the year’s vaccine, and 76 percent of type B virus samples were not similar to the virus in that year’s vaccine. During the 1992-1993 season, 84 percent of samples for the predominant type A virus were not similar to the virus in the vaccine.

Here is a list of the most common side effects of the flu vaccine and antidotes as stated by the CDC:

* Fever
* Fatigue
* Muscle aches
* Headache

According to the CDC, the effectiveness of flu vaccine in preventing illness among elderly persons residing in nursing homes is 30 to 40 percent (CDC, 2001b).

Other studies have shown an even lower efficacy of 0 to 36 percent (averaging 21 percent). The CDC proudly notes that for those elderly persons living outside of nursing homes, flu vaccine is 30 to 70 percent effective in preventing hospitalization for pneumonia and influenza; the rationale being that one-third of Americans have a risk factor or chronic disease that puts them at risk of increased morbidity from the flu.

Vaccination is currently recommended for children over six months of age with high-risk medical conditions but is not recommended for healthy children.

Live intranasal vaccine was found to be 93 percent effective in preventing influenza in children age one to six years old (Belshe et al., 1998).

A mass vaccination program was mounted that year by the U.S. government,

During that year the rate of GBS in Ohio was 13.3 per million in vaccine recipients compared to 2.6 per million in nonrecipients (Marks & Halpin, 1980).

A follow-up study also showed a significantly increased incidence of GBS during the first six weeks following receipt of the vaccine in patients residing in two other states.

According to the CDC, two groups are most vulnerable to methylmercury — the fetus and children ages 14 and younger.

We are confronted with what is undoubtedly the single most potent technology the world has ever known — more powerful even than atomic energy.

Yet it is being released throughout our environment and deployed with superficial or no risk assessments as if no one needs to worry an iota about its unparalleled powers to harm life as we know it — for all future generations.

Dr. Joseph Mercola, an osteopathic physician is warning us that these flu vaccines they now want to give to kids contains mercury. The government just finished a two-year process to start to get the mercury out of the hepatitis B vaccines. Now they want to reintroduce mercury back again with flu vaccines.

The “experts” will use fear to motivate people to get a flu shot. Let’s be clear, flu can definitely be a killer disease and is not something that should be easily dismissed. But, remember that flu shots don’t prevent illness-never have, never will.

The flu shot actually weakens the immune system and makes you more predisposed to the illness.

Avoid the flu shot just like you would avoid anthrax, and concentrate on eliminating the destroyer of health from your diet by following a healthy eating plan.

As for flu antidotes like Tamiflu you need to know what an antidote really is. An antidote is a substance which can counteract a form of poisoning. The antidotes are manufactured by injecting the toxin or flu virus into an animal in small doses and extracting the resulting antibodies from the host animals’ blood. What you fail to under stand is that with an antidote or vaccine healthy people are infected with the toxin or flu virus. People who weren’t infected are now infected, not by exposure but from the administering of the vaccine or antidote. So if you are really afraid of being infected with the Swine flu don’t get a vaccination or antidote if you are currently not infected. If you do, and you are healthy, the vaccine and antidote will infect you.

More people have suffered more serve and life threatening symptoms as a result of a being vaccinated or after taking an antidote than those with the actual virus. Furthermore health officials have already stated that there is no cure for this flu virus so why would anyone willingly get vaccinated or take an antidote that will give you the flu virus?

Barack Obama invited top bankers to Washington to personally thank them with $trillion bonuses for their campaign donations. AIG, has received $173 billion in federal tax dollars over the past six months for their $21,339,000 campaign donation.

Obama’s first 100 days is really starting to show Obama’s lack of leadership. He has been entrusted with the job of serving and protecting the US people. He won this leadership on the promise of CHANGE. After 100 days there has been no change. The corruption is still there. The US is still in Iraq. The US still tortures. Obama is bailing out his financial backers and letting real jobs disappear. The shareholders of the US Federal reserve, a private company, has received $700 billion in Obama bonuses. Obama is showing his lack of leadership by forcing Chrysler into bankruptcy because a US$4 billion loan compared to US$700 billion Obama bonuses to his banking campaign donors. Those bank bailouts are free of any conditions or demands. They were given to the banks. They are not loans that has to be repaid. They are Obama gifts, free money. With Chrysler, they are offered a measly $4 billion loan that Obama expects to be repaid in full within 60 days.

There is something very wrong when the president of the United States uses US tax dollars to help his banking buddies clear their toxic debt and yet allows thousands of good paying jobs to disappear. Obama is just as corrupt as Bush was. Obama is robbing the US blind, first by stealing their money to reward banks, then by stealing their life savings by taking over the people’s local banks and now by stealing their livelihood. The US can’t afford another 100 days with Obama as president. In just 100 days he has incurred more debt than any other president in the US history. He has given away more money in $trillion gifts to banks than any other president in US history. Obama has no right to force a private company to declare bankruptcy. Chrysler is not bankrupt. Chrysler is a victim of the US presidents created financial crisis. Chrysler has more than enough real assets to keep going. Chrysler has received just $4 billion in loans. If Obama wants to force anyone in bankruptcy it should be the big banks that he has been giving $trillion bonuses to. Congress has the power to coin money and has control over the financial sector not the private sector. When the big banks that make up the privately owned US Federal Reserve declared their massive loses they should have been dissolved. They should have been held accountable.

There are a lot of unanswered questions concerning the US government’s using federal tax dollars to clear the debts of big banks. They need to be answered. They need to be addressed. They need to be investigated thoroughly. The whole thing clearly looks like an elaborate scheme that clearly involves criminal activity on the part of the bankers, the Bush and Obama White Houses and the US Congress. Any law enforcement agent can tell you that the US government is completely corrupt - from the top down. The US government is openly engaging in a money laundering scheme. The US government has been offered and has accepted bribes from the bankers that are the shareholders of the US Federal Reserve.

You need to question the actions of Obama and the US Congress. How much bribe money did it take to transfer $700 Billion taxpayer dollars to Wall Street’s elite? How much money did your Representative get from Big Bankers to look the other way and pass a bill that the American people clearly do not want? They need to be held accountable for their actions. They need to be held accountable for their crimes. What crime did Obama, members of the US Congress and the bankers commit? The charge is US Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 11 > § 201 Bribery of public officials and witnesses - “A secret payment to a public officer in exchange for preferential treatment.”

At common law, bribery was a criminal offence, as described in Russell on Crimes: “… the receiving or offering any undue reward by or to any person whatsoever, in a public office in order to influence his behavior in office and induce him to act contrary to the known rules of honesty and integrity.”

With almost $83 million being spent to bribe congress by the same companies who received $180 billion, or 25.7% of the $700 billion in federal bailout funds,it is time to consider impeaching all those who took bribes in return for federal bailout funds.

The evidence reveals that banks and insurance companies who are looking to receive taxpayer money are spending money on bribing Congress. Banks and insurance companies started bribing members of Congress in the form of campaign contributions.

A recent issue of BusinessWeek Magazine indicated the following correlation between bailout funds received and lobbying (bribery) dollars spent.

AIG - received $40 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $21,339,000

Citigroup - received $45 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $16,140,000

JP Morgan Chase - received $25 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $10,925,000

GMAC - received $5 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $6,080,000

Bank of America (Includes Merrill Lynch) - received $45 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $16,430,000

Goldman Sachs - received $10 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $6,000,000

Morgan Stanley - received $10 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $5,880,000

Total of $180 Billion in Federal Bailout Funding handed out for providing US Congressmen and Congresswomen with bribes amounting to $82,794,000

Information is from the February 23, 2009 issue of BusinessWeek, Pg 036

In short those companies are bribing our government officials. Those companies have paid lobbyists (bribers) offering members of Congress gifts in exchange for preferential treatment, in this case, federal bailout funds - a federal offense, an impeachable offense.

Here’s a list of the banks that got US tax dollars. http://money.cnn.com/news/specials/storysupplement/bankbailout/

Another list that graphically illustrates the top recipients of the Obama bonuses. The $1.1 Trillion Taxpayer-Funded Bailout

Rumsfeld stands to profit from the A-H1N1 influenza. Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was the chairman of Gilead in 1997

The World is heading towards a pandemic if it uses Tamiflu as a treatment for the A-H1N1 virus (Swine flu). The Tamiflu antibiotic will be the catalyst to turn this mild influenza into a pandemic.

On May 29, 2008 an FDA advisory panel has recommended stronger warnings on two influenza drugs after reviewing evidence linking them to neurological and psychiatric problems that have led to deaths in some cases.

The current warning on Roche Laboratories’ Tamiflu (generic name oseltamivir) urges close monitoring of flu patients, particularly children, for “increased risk of self injury and confusion shortly after taking Tamiflu.” The panel recommended that this warning be strengthened to say that “in some cases, these behaviors resulted in serious injuries, including death, in adult and pediatric patients.”

There have been no reported deaths from Tamiflu in the United States, but in Japan, where the drug is much more widely used, at least 14 deaths were reported in 2008. Five children under the age of 17 died after “falling from windows or balconies or running into traffic,” according to the FDA. According to Roche, two people under the age of 21 died from a brain infection, and seven deaths from neuropsychiatric symptoms have also been attributed to use of the drug by adults.

Tamiflu isn’t a vaccine. The manufacturers even spell that out in their factsheet. It’s a drug, an antibiotic for viruses. Despite what it’s being sold as people have died after being treated with Tamiflu. People have died - not from the virus, but from the Tamiflu antibiotic. A healthy body, and a properly functioning immune system, can withstand any viral attack including this one. The usual boring admonitions apply: wash your hands, stay well-rested and well-hydrated. You do not need to buy Tamiflu. It is an effective antiviral drug but has many side effects. More people will die from the Tamiflu antibiotic than from the A-H1N1 virus. The pandemic will rear its ugly head as soon as the government starts administering the Tamiflu antibiotics. At least a few hundred and at most a few thousand have been infected with the A-H1N1 virus. If millions start taking the Tamiflu antibiotic then immediately millions will be become extremely ill and die, not from the A-H1N1 virus but from the treatment.

The medicine was widely used during the avian flu epidemic in Southeast Asia which occurred in 2005. Also, whether or not it is actually helpful in treating the disease has been questioned by scientists in different parts of the world. Sir Liam Donaldson, a high ranking UK physician claims Tamiflu lacks convincing evidence towards treating avian influenza. He is supported by Nguyen Tuong Van, MD, working within the Center for Tropical Diseases in Hanoi, Vietnam. He has been involved in treating 41 victims of the H5N1 virus and he says the drug has not been widely successful in human patients.

The swine flu outbreak boosted shares of makers of flu treatments, vaccines and tests Monday. Gilead (Tamiflu antidote) shares rose $1.73, or 3.8 percent, to $47.53. Relenza, an inhaled drug, is made by GlaxoSmithKline, which saw U.S.-traded shares rise $2.22, or 7.6 percent, to $31.56.

Both companies have confirmed that the swine flu strain is sensitive to their drugs. “Assuming the stockpile will be replenished, we estimate this represents up to $388 million worth of Tamiflu sales or $70 million in royalties for Gilead,” Thomas Weisel analyst Ian Somaiya said in a note to investors. “However, if the outbreak escalates into a pandemic we expect further upside driven by retail demand for the drug.”

Lazard Capital Markets analyst Joel Sendek also said Gilead is a likely beneficiary of the swine flu outbreak, with increased sales of Tamiflu.

In other words Gilead will profit from this influenza outbreak. If it the outbreak escalates into a pandemic they stand to be the sole beneficiary. Gilead has motive, means and opportunity to intentionally release a new strain of influenza - one that only their medicine can treat. I don’t have to remind you that the UN and the WHO have both stated that there is no cure, only treatment. That means Gilead will profit from you until you are dead.

Let’s not forget about Donald Rumsfeld’s connection to this swine flu outbreak. The Rumsfeld history starts in 1976, when a military recruit in New Jersey died from a flu that experts speculated might be the “swine flu” virus of 1918 pandemic fame… Rumsfeld, who was then the US secretary of defense, made the imminent “swine flu” a political issue to add some spark to the campaign of President Ford, an interim leader without a cause. At Rumsfeld’s urging, the administration would ensure that “every man, woman and child” was vaccinated. Huge amounts of vaccine were produced and distributed quickly. Today he’s back with a so-called new strain of swine flu and again the government is being urged to vaccinate “every man, women and child”.

The following are the symptoms associated with A-H1N1 (or as the media has been calling it - the Swine Flu):

* cough
* fever
* sore throat
* shortness of breath
* muscle and joint pain

The drugs Tamiflu and Relenza are touted as the most effective treatment against A-H1N1. The US White House has just confirmed that they are shipping Tamiflu and Relenza to the affected states. What you don’t know is that former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is reported, by CNN, to be the major shareholder in Tamiflu. According to the CNN report: “Rumsfeld served as Gilead (Research)’s chairman from 1997 until he joined the Bush administration in 2001, and he still holds a Gilead stake valued at between $5 million and $25 million, according to federal financial disclosures filed by Rumsfeld. ” Gilead Sciences, the California biotech company owns the rights to Tamiflu, the influenza remedy that’s now the most-sought after drug in the world.

Rumsfeld isn’t the only political heavyweight benefiting from demand for Tamiflu, which is manufactured and marketed by Swiss pharma giant Roche. (Gilead receives a royalty from Roche equaling about 10% of sales.) Former Secretary of State George Shultz, who is on Gilead’s board, has sold more than $7 million worth of Gilead since the beginning of 2005. Another board member is the wife of former California Gov. Pete Wilson.

Before you go rushing off to buy Tamiflu, and make Rumsfeld richer, you should know about its side effects:

Common adverse drug reactions with oseltamivir therapy (oseltamivir is marketed by Roche under the trade name Tamiflu) include:

nausea,
vomiting,
diarrhea,
abdominal pain,
headache,
hepatitis,
elevated liver enzymes,
rash

Allergic reactions include:

anaphylaxis (Anaphylactic shock), and
Stevens-Johnson syndrome (a life-threatening condition affecting the skin in which cell death causes the epidermis to separate from the dermis - flesh-eating bacteria syndrome).

Other side effects include:

toxic epidermal necrolysis,
cardiac arrhythmia,
seizure,
confusion,
aggravation of diabetes, and
haemorrhagic colitis.

I don’t know about you but the treatment is far worse than the disease. Talk about jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire.

Workers and residents evacuated themselves from several downtown Manhattan buildings Monday after a low-flying Boeing 747 was spotted above the city’s skyline. The aircraft was a White House plane taking part in a photo shoot, the FAA said later. And Louis Caldera, director of the White House Military Office, issued an apology: “I apologize and take responsibility for any distress that flight caused.” The 747 was non other than Air Force One - the US president’s official aircraft.

The huge aircraft, which functions as Air Force One when the president is aboard, was taking part in a classified, government-sanctioned photo shoot, the Federal Aviation Administration said.

“Last week, I approved a mission over New York. I take responsibility for that decision,” said Louis Caldera, director of the White House Military Office. “While federal authorities took the proper steps to notify state and local authorities in New York and New Jersey, it’s clear that the mission created confusion and disruption.”

Witnesses reported seeing the plane circle over the Upper New York Bay near the Statue of Liberty before flying up the Hudson River. It was reported, photographed and video taped, to have been accompanied by two F-16s, typical for when the president is aboard the aircraft. The flight sparked fear in the New York-New Jersey area. The White House is insistent that Obama was not aboard the aircraft despite the F16s.

People on the ground have stated that it appeared that Air Force One was taking evasive manoeuvres. The flights were very erratic, at times flying very close to skyscrapers and at the last moment veering away. One New York Plaza, was evacuated, as were most of the high rises in this area. People thought they were being attacked again.

The United States can expect a terrorist attack using nuclear or more likely biological weapons before 2013, reports a bipartisan commission in a study briefed December 2, 2008 to Vice President-elect Joe Biden.

Scientists are unsure where the new swine flu virus originally emerged, though it was identifed first in the United States. They say there is nothing about the virus that makes it “Mexican” and worry such a label would be stigmatizing. The World Health Organization raised its global alert level Monday, signaling the swine flu virus was spreading from human to human in community outbreaks, but it stopped short of declaring a full-blown pandemic.

It is being reported that the deadly swine flu “combines genetic material from pigs, birds and humans in a way researchers have not seen before,” thus leading many to suspect it was cooked up in a lab.

Swine flu panic is spreading in Mexico and soldiers are patrolling the streets after it was confirmed that human to human transmission is occurring and that the virus is a brand new strain which is seemingly affecting young, healthy people the worst. Questions about the source of the outbreak are also being asked after a public health official said that the virus was “cultured in a laboratory”.

“This strain of swine influenza that’s been cultured in a laboratoryis something that’s not been seen anywhere actually in the United States and the world, so this is actually a new strain of influenza that’s been identified,” said Dr. John Carlo, Dallas Co. Medical Director.

Was this a slip-up or an admission that this new super-strain of swine influenza was deliberately cultured in a laboratory and released?

Alarming reports are now filtering in about people catching the illness who have had no contact with pigs whatsoever. These include a man and his daughter in San Diego County, a 41-year-old woman in Imperial County and two teenagers in San Antonio, Texas. In fact, in all U.S. cases, the victims had no contact with any pigs.

Dr. Wilma Wooten, San Diego County’s public health officer, told KPBS “We have had person-to-person spread with the father and the daughter,” says Wooten, “And also with the two teenagers in Texas, they were in the same school. So that also indicates person-to-person transfer.”

“Dr. Wooten says it’s unclear how people were exposed to swine flu. She says none of the patients have had any contact with pigs,” according to the report.

Although the situation in the U.S. looks under control, panic is spreading in Mexico, where 800 cases of pneumonia in the capital alone are suspected to be related to the swine flu and the virus has hit young and healthy people, which is very rare with an flu outbreak. Despite the danger of a pandemic, the U.S. border with Mexico remains open.

“Mexico has shut schools and museums and canceled hundreds of public events in its sprawling, overcrowded capital of 20 million people to try to prevent further infections,” reports Reuters.

“My level of concern is significant,” said Dr. Martin Fenstersheib, the health officer for Santa Clara County. “We have a novel virus, a brand-new strain that’s spreading human to human, and we are also seeing a virulent strain in Mexico that seems to be related. We certainly have concerns for this escalating.”

The WHO insists that the outbreak has “pandemic potential” and has been stockpiling supplies of Tamiflu, known generically as oseltamivir, a pill that can both treat flu and prevent infection, according to officials.

As we previously highlighted, those that have a stake in the Tamiflu vaccine include top globalists and BIlderberg members like George Shultz, Lodewijk J.R. de Vink and former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld who personally profited from the release of Aspartame.

Indeed, Rumsfeld himself played a key role in hyping an outbreak of swine flu back in the 1976 when he urged the entire country to get vaccinated. Many batches of the vaccine were contaminated, resulting in hundreds of sick people and 52 fatalities.

The fact that the properties of the strain are completely new, that the virus is spreading from people to people, and that the young and healthy are being hit worst, has disturbing parallels to the deadly 1918 pandemic that killed millions.

It is unclear as to why, if the virus is a brand new strain, that public health officials are so confident programs of mass vaccination, which are already being prepared, would necessarily be effective.

It certainly wouldn’t be the first time that deadly flu viruses have been concocted in labs and then dispatched with the intention of creating a pandemic.

When the story first broke last month, Czech newspapers questioned if the shocking discovery of vaccines contaminated with the deadly avian flu virus which were distributed to 18 countries by the American company Baxter were part of a conspiracy to provoke a pandemic.

Since the probability of mixing a live virus biological weapon with vaccine material by accident is virtually impossible, this leaves no other explanation than that the contamination was a deliberate attempt to weaponize the H5N1 virus to its most potent extreme and distribute it via conventional flu vaccines to the population who would then infect others to a devastating degree as the disease went airborne.

However, this is not the first time that vaccine companies have been caught distributing vaccines contaminated with deadly viruses.

In 2006 it was revealed that Bayer Corporation had discovered that their injection drug, which was used by hemophiliacs, was contaminated with the HIV virus. Internal documents prove that after they positively knew that the drug was contaminated, they took it off the U.S. market only to dump it on the European, Asian and Latin American markets, knowingly exposing thousands, most of them children, to the live HIV virus. Government officials in France went to prison for allowing the drug to be distributed. The documents show that the FDA colluded with Bayer to cover-up the scandal and allowed the deadly drug to be distributed globally. No Bayer executives ever faced arrest or prosecution in the United States.

In the UK, a 2007 outbreak of foot and mouth disease that put Britain on high alert has been originated from a government laboratory which is shared with an American pharmaceutical company, mirroring the deadly outbreak of 2001, which was also deliberately released.

The last time there was a significant outbreak of a new form of swine flu in the U.S. it originated at the army base at Fort Dix, New Jersey. This time evidence is pointing to the virus originating at the army base at Fort Detrick. We previously reported that Fort Detrick’s Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus spreads globally. This new information brings validity to the story that the World is being infected with Fort Detrick’s Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus, either by accident or intentionally.

Influenza, commonly known as the flu, is an infectious disease caused by RNA viruses of the family Orthomyxoviridae (the influenza viruses), that affects birds and mammals. The name influenza comes from the Italian: influenza, meaning “influence”, (Latin: influentia). In humans, common symptoms of the disease are chills, fever, pharyngitis, muscle pains, severe headache, coughing, weakness and general discomfort.[1] In more serious cases, influenza causes pneumonia, which can be fatal, particularly in young children and the elderly. Although it is often confused with the common cold, influenza is a much more severe disease and is caused by a different type of virus. Flu spreads around the world in seasonal epidemics, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands annually — millions in pandemic years. Today it was reported that the WHO is worried about an influenza strain that has killed more than 60 Mexican people and infected over 1000. They are stating that there is no vaccine for this type of influenza. That is not entirely true. Native North American Indians knew about the health benefits of a fruit that was used to prevent and treat influenza-like infections and infectious diseases. There is a natural remedy to protect yourself from being stricken with influenza. Rosehips were taken as a tonic and the juice or tea was taken to increase the body’s resistance against disease.

The rose hip and rose haw, is the pomaceous fruit of the rose plant, that typically is red-to-orange, but might be dark purple-to-black in some species. Contrary to the fairly common myth, rosehips are not poisonous. In World War II, the people of England gathered wild-grown rose hips and made a Vitamin C syrup for children.

Scientific Names:
Rosa canina L. (predominant species in commerce) and other Rosa spp. [Fam. Rosaceae]

Forms:
Aqueous extract of whole rosehips cut and dried; rosehip extracts

Traditional Usage:

- Acne (astringent tea)
- Antioxidant
- Bone and Joint Disorders
- Colds
- Colic
- Chills
- Digestive Disorders
- Diuretic
- Edema
- Eyewash
- Gastric-juice Deficiency
- Gastrointestinal Disorders
- Influenza
- Infections
- Laxative (whole rosehips with pectin)
- Scurvy
- Urinary Tract Disorders
- Vitamin C Deficiency

Health benefits:

The fruit of dog rose, Rosa canina L. [Fam. Rosaceae], is a fleshy red hip that is rich in Vitamin C with about 1700–2000 mg per 100 g in the dried product, one of the richest plant sources, and carotenoids and can be used for the prevention and treatment of vitamin C and A deficiency and scurvy. The Rosaceae family contains many of the most important edible fruits grown in temperate areas including apple, pear, peach, plum, cherry, apricot, almond, nectarine, prune, hawthorn, loquat, quince, raspberry, blackberry and strawberry. The fleshy hips of roses are no less edible and nutritious than these more popular fruits. Rosehip tea was traditionally used for preventing and treating colds, chills and influenza-type infections, as well as for treating other infectious diseases. Rosehips were taken as a tonic and the juice or tea was taken to increase the body’s resistance against disease, for treating gastric-juice deficiency, for bowel disorders and to aid digestion. The German Commission E also lists rosehips for treating biliary complaints and colic, urinary tract disorders, edema (water retention) and for strengthening the kidneys. The hip tea is also listed as a diuretic and as a treatment for bone and joint disorders and as an astringent and eyewash. The pectin in the hips makes them effective as a mild laxative, similar to apples for helping regularity. The seeds themselves are also listed by the German Commission E as a treatment for kidney and urinary tract disorders, for edema, as a diuretic and for bone and joint complaints, although it acknowledges that the efficacy of these indications has not been proven. Modern studies show that rosehip extracts inhibit lipid oxidation in vitro and in clinical studies patients suffering from osteoarthritis reported that physical symptoms declined. Data from a randomised controlled trial indicate not only that pain significantly declined but also flexion of the hip improved in the active treatment group.

Active Ingredients:

Rosehips contain: Up to 1.7% L-Ascorbic acid as the essential constituent; pectins; tannins; sugar, plant acids; red and yellow pigments, especially carotenoids, mainly different isomers of rubixanthin, lycopene, beta-carotene, beta-chryptoxanthin, zeaxanthin and lutein. Rosehips also contain many other flavonoid-type antioxidants such as anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins. Rosehip seeds contain: Up to 10% fixed oil; up to 0.3% essential oil; traces of vitamin C; and inorganic substances.

SARS, Influenza and Rose Hips

The clinical features of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and influenza are similar. The WHO also stated in the 2002-2003 outbreak that SARS has no vaccine, no effective treatment, and no reliable point-of care diagnostic test. SARS Symptoms included fever and lower respiratory tract infection (cough, difficulty breathing, shortness of breath). An effective treatment for the illness known as SARS has been developed by a team of doctors and emerging diseases experts based on a little-known antidote to coronavirus—the agent most scientists say is responsible for the disease. According Dr. Leonard Horowitz, an internationally known expert in public health and emerging diseases, coronavirus can be most efficiently treated with methanolic extracts of two little known berry bushes common to British Columbia and the northwestern states. Amelanchier alnifolia and Rosa nutkana (Rose Hips) —both members of the Rosaceae family of plants—were proven in 1995 to completely protect cells grown in experimental cultures from coronavirus attack. The leaders of the scientific team of coronavirus and Rosaceae plant investigators is the esteemed Canadian botanist, Dr. Neil Towers, Professor Emeritus at the University ofBritish Columbia in Vancouver. It was his research group that pioneered the study that demonstrated the power of the Rosaceae plants to overcome coronavirus infections in cell cultures—a system far more sensitive to toxicity than living organismsIt has also been used very effectively against bronchitis, pneumonia and other diseases of the respiratory tract.

Rose Hip tea

The fruits that remain behind after the rose flower is done blooming, rosa rugosa flower (a species of rose native to eastern Asia, in northeastern China, Japan, Korea and southeastern Siberia, where it grows on the coast, often on sand dunes.) varieties are cited as some of the best hips to use.

To make a simple tea, boil enough water to fill your kettle. Infuse with 1/4 cup ground rose hips (use a coffee grinder), 1 black tea bag (any breakfast tea will do) or 1 Tbs loose-leaf black tea, honey to taste, and a couple of cloves if you desire. Strain before drinking.

Report submitted by PAUL W KINCAID, Toronto Ontario Canada

Veterinarian tries to save a flu stricken thoroughbred polo horse from the Venezuelan polo team

On April 22, 2009 CNN reported that missing vials of a potentially dangerous virus have prompted an Army investigation into the disappearance from a lab in Maryland.

The Army’s Criminal Investigation Command agents have been visiting Fort Detrick in Frederick, Maryland, to investigate the disappearance of the vials. The vials contained samples of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis, a virus that sickens horses and can be spread to humans by mosquitoes. In 97 percent of cases, humans with the virus suffer flu-like symptoms, but it can be deadly in about 1 out of 100 cases, according to Caree Vander Linden, a spokeswoman for the Army’s Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. There is an effective vaccine for the disease and there hasn’t been an outbreak in the United States since 1971.

The vials had been at the research institute’s facility at Fort Detrick, home of the Army’s top biological research facility, for more than a decade. According to the Army investigators, who are in damage control mode, he three missing vials were among thousands of vials that were under the control of a senior scientist who retired in 2004. They are claiming that when another Fort Detrick scientist recently inventoried the retired scientist’s biological samples, he discovered that the three vials of the virus were missing. The original scientist’s records about his vials dated back to the days of paper-and-pen inventories.

During this ongoing investigation, the retired scientist and another former Fort Detrick researcher have cooperated with investigating agents and, according to Vander Linden, they returned to the facility to help look for the vials.

This investigation comes two months after all research at the research institute facility at Fort Detrick was halted for a complete computer-based inventory of all disease samples at the fort. That inventory is expected to be complete before summer and may help solve the mystery of the three missing vials, officials said.

The CNN report comes just a few days after it had also reported that 21 thoroughbred horses dropped dead in a mysterious scene Sunday April 19, 2009 before a polo match near West Palm Beach, Florida. State and local veterinary teams were reported to be trying to figure out what happened at the International Polo Club Palm Beach in Wellington, Florida, as team Lechuza Caracas prepared to compete in a U.S. Open match. In all 21 horses from a Venezuelan team died suddenly in the mystery outbreak that has left the sport in shock. The horses from the Lechuza Caracas team were due to appear in the semi-final of the US Open in Florida, the most high-profile event in the American polo calendar and a highlight of the international circuit. The head of a Tallahassee-based pharmacy has stated on Thursday that it incorrectly mixed a medication that was given to 21 horses and US officials are accepting this as the cause of death.

Is this just a coincidence or a cover up story for the US Army losing 3 vials of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis (VEE), a virus that sickens horses and can be spread to humans by mosquitoes and through respiratory secretions. It is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality among these animals. VEE can affect all equine species, such as horses, donkeys, and zebras. After infection, equines may suddenly die or show progressive central nervous system disorders. Humans also can contract this disease. Healthy adults who become infected by the virus may experience flu-like symptoms, such as high fevers and headaches. People with weakened immune systems and the young and the elderly can become severely ill or die from this disease. Another virus Swine influenza has very similar symptoms. Swine influenza is an acute respiratory disease of pigs caused by influenza A virus. This virus like the Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis virus is also associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Just today April 24, 2009 CNN reported that Mexico City has closed schools as a result of an outbreak of swine influenza that has been linked to 60 deaths in Mexico and infecting people in the US. U.S. health officials expressed concern Friday that a swine flu virus that has infected eight people in the United States matches samples of a virus that has killed at least 60 people in Mexico. U.S. health experts also are concerned because nearly 1,000 people have fallen ill in Mexico City in a short period of time. “This situation has been developing quickly,” said acting CDC director Richard Besser. “This is something we are worried about.” Eight cases were reported in the US on Friday and all of the eight U.S. patients have recovered, Besser said.

Why have they recovered so quickly? Could it be that the US officials know what they are dealing with – a biologically engineered virus that went missing and has now infected people and animals alike in Mexico and Florida. As they know what they are dealing with they know what the antidote is. They cannot offer Mexico the anti-virus because then the World would know that the US is responsible for this outbreak. The World would want to know if this was a mistake or did the US actually intentionally release a lethal virus.

Can people get inflected with animal viruses? The answer is yes. Influenza or flu viruses are classified as influenza A, B, C which constitutes 3 separate genera, based upon the characteristics of nucleoprotein and matrix protein of these three; A has been subdivided on the basis of surface antigens, hemagglutinin, and neuraminidase. B and C are similarly designated but these are rare intratypic variations in B and none with C.

Animal flu viruses cause infection normally in animals, similarly as human flu virus causes infection in humans. The problem arises when these animal viruses infect the humans, and as humans have no immunity against these pathogens occurrence of explosive pandemics may be anticipated. The problem is a global concern if this was a biologically engineered virus created by the US and someone within the US has intentionally released it.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp is a United States government corporation created by the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. It provides deposit insurance, which guarantees the safety of deposits in member banks, currently up to $250,000 per depositor per bank. Funds in non-interest bearing transaction accounts are fully insured, with no limit, under the temporary Transaction Account Guarantee Program. However, not all banks are participating in the TLGP/TAGP.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp seized banks in Georgia, Michigan, California and Idaho with total assets of $2.3 billion. American Southern Bank of Kennesaw, Georgia; Michigan Heritage Bank in Farmington Hills; and First Bank of Beverly Hills in Calabasas, California, were shut by state agencies. First Bank of Idaho in Ketchum was closed by the Office of Thrift Supervision. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was named receiver of all four.

The seizures will cost the FDIC’s insurance fund a total of $698.4 million in return for $2.3 billion in assets. The banks in the other three states are being taken over by institutions in their regions. The FDIC claims it couldn’t find a buyer for First Bank of Beverly Hills (because no notice was ever published looking for a buyer) so under a false pretext assumed control of the bank and stole the company’s $1.5 billion in deposit assets.

Bank of North Georgia in Alpharetta, a unit of Synovus Financial Corp., is steal over American Southern’s account holders deposits and its single office, which will open April 27. Michigan Heritage’s deposits are being stolen by closely held Level One Bank in Farmington Hills and its three branches will open next week. U.S. Bancorp in Minneapolis, the sixth-largest U.S. bank by deposits, takes control of First Bank of Idaho’s seven branches and steal the real assets of its depositors.

“Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage,” the FDIC said.

When money is concerned and the government wanting to get their hands on more or all of the customers’ deposits I would be very concerned. Anyone with deposit assets more than the FDIC’s insured $250,000 per depositor per bank should be very concerned and should take immediate steps to protect their assets from government theft. If you have $1 million in interest bearing transaction accounts then when the FDIC decides to simply takeover your bank you will lose $750,000 in their theft scheme. Everyone with deposits greater than $250,000 should reduce their deposits to $250,000 in a single bank as your own personal insurance against this bank robbery by the US government. The US government knows that they would become very unpopular very quickly if they raised the taxes of the American people in order to pay for their $trillion US Federal Reserve Bonuses for party campaign contribution scheme. The money has to come from somewhere so they are targeting your bank deposits. There are no investigations into bank failures. The government needs only to declare that a a particular bank, perhaps you bank, is failing and steps in to take it over. It is done so quickly, like what happened Friday, so that no one has a chance to figure out what is going on. The stress test that were ongoing, ordered by your government, was the instrument used to holdup your banks and rob them of your money.

The Obama government has forced your bank to submit to their stress test program. Obama has taken the financial firms’ balance sheets and set up models for what will happen if the economy worsens. Any bank that looks weak under the circumstance of the trials will be asked to raise capital. In the current credit environment, that many be nearly impossible to do.

For the last eight weeks, nearly 200 federal examiners have labored inside some of the nation’s biggest banks to determine how those institutions would hold up if the recession deepened.

What they are discovering may come as a relief to both the financial industry and the public: the banking industry, broadly speaking, seems to be in better shape than the doom and gloom depression claims that both the Bush and Obama administration have been propagandizing in order to steal $trillions from the tax taxpayers.

Obama and his Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has ordered banks not to divulge data on the testing when they put out their first quarter numbers. That stance violates disclosure rules for public companies which requires them to give out “material” information about their businesses. How each firm performed in the government trials would certainly qualify. Obama knows what he is doing is illegal and he knows that if the banks divulge the data on their testing someone will no doubt see what is going on and what is going on is criminal.

The bank stress tests currently underway are “a complete sham,” says William Black, a former senior bank regulator and S&L prosecutor, and currently an Associate Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri - Kansas City. “It’s a Potemkin model. Built to fool people.” Like many others, Black believes the “worst case scenario” used in the stress test don’t go far enough.

Black, who was counsel to the Federal Home Loan Bank Board during the S&L Crisis, says the program’s failings go way beyond such technical issues. “There is no real purpose [of the stress test] other than to fool us. To make us chumps,” Black says. Noting policymakers have long stated the problem is a lack of confidence, Black says Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is now essentially saying: “’If we lie and they believe us, all will be well.’ It’s Orwellian.”

The former regulator is extremely critical of Geithner, calling him a “failed regulator” now “adding to failed policy” by not allowing “banks that really need desperately to be closed” to fail.

Black says the stress test must also be viewed in the context of Geithner’s toxic debt plan, which he calls “an enormous taxpayer subsidy for people who caused the problem.” The fact bank stocks have been rising since Geithner unveiled his plan is “bad news for taxpayers,” he says. “It’s the subsidy of all history.”

H.A.A.R.P. - US weapon of mass destruction

The debate on global warming under UN auspices provides but a partial picture of climate change; in addition to the devastating impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the ozone layer, the World’s climate can now be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated “non-lethal weapons.” Both the Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to manipulate the World’s climate.

In the US, the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) as part of the (”Star Wars”) Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI). Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes and is the sole reason for causing the melting of the polar ice.

World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that “US military scientists are working on weather systems as a potential weapon. The methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth’s atmosphere to produce targeted droughts, floods and storms.” Already in the 1970s, former National Security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski had foreseen in his book “Between Two Ages” that:

“Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised… Techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm. ”

Marc Filterman, a former French military officer, outlines several types of “unconventional weapons” using radio frequencies. He refers to “weather war,” indicating that the U.S. and the Soviet Union had already “mastered the know-how needed to unleash sudden climate changes (hurricanes, drought) in the early 1980s.” These technologies make it “possible to trigger atmospheric disturbances by using Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) radar [waves].”

A simulation study of future defense “scenarios” commissioned for the US Air Force calls for: “US aerospace forces to ‘own the weather’ by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications.” From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.

THE HIGH-FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURAL RESEARCH PROGRAM - HAARP

The High-Frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) based in Gokoma Alaska-jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy-is part of a new generation of sophisticated weaponry under the US Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Operated by the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Space Vehicles Directorate, HAARP constitutes a system of powerful antennas capable of creating “controlled local modifications of the ionosphere”.

Scientist Dr. Nicholas Begich-actively involved in the public campaign against HAARP-describes HAARP as: “A super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere (upper layer of the atmosphere) by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything-living and dead.”

Dr. Rosalie Bertell depicts HAARP as “a gigantic heater that can cause major disruption in the ionosphere, creating not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the planet.” - HAARP has created created a huge hole in the atmosphere above Canada’s North and the sun radiation is now bombarding the polar ice causing it to rapidly melt.

HAARP has been presented to public opinion as a program of scientific and academic research. US military documents suggest, however, that HAARP’s main objective is to “exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes.” Without explicitly referring to the HAARP program, a US Air Force study points to the use of “induced ionospheric modifications” as a means of altering weather patterns as well as disrupting enemy communications and radar.

According to Dr. Rosalie Bertell, HAARP is part of a integrated weapons’ system, which has potentially devastating environmental consequences: “It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere. It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature.

The military implications of combining these projects is alarming. The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening. The project is likely to be “sold” to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a device for repairing the ozone layer.

H.A.R.R.P. is a weapon of mass destruction and no nation is safe. HAARP is being used to accelerate the melting of the polar ice of Canada’s north? The reason is the huge deposits of oil and natural gas. The area — one of the planet’s most fragile and pristine ecosystems — sits atop a bounty of untapped fossil fuels. And as the melting polar ice makes the Arctic more accessible to ships, several countries are scrambling to claim jurisdiction in the area.

“The economic interests are reflected in … competing claims by relevant stakeholders, and resumed military presence in the area,” NATO said on its Web site. “As it is a region of enduring strategic importance for NATO and allied security, developments in the High North require careful and ongoing examination.”

The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that 90 billion barrels of oil, 44 billion barrels of natural gas liquids and 1,670 trillion cubic feet of natural gas are recoverable in the frozen region north of the Arctic Circle. At the same time, Arctic water is warming so quickly that the entire region could be ice-free by 2013 - all a result of the US weapon of mass destruction called HAARP, not Global warming. HAARP is truly a weapon of mass destruction as it is completely destroying Canada’s North, it’s polar ice, it’s eco system and wildlife that is dependent on the ice for it’s very survival.

Based on the scientific proof that Global Warming is not the result of higher levels of carbon emissions but brought about by HAARP the logical solution to stop the rapid melting of the Polar Ice would be to pass a Global law that bans scientific research and development of any kind that manipulates the Earth’s atmosphere - like HAARP. We demanded and was given a similar ban - nuclear weapons testing. A ban would force the US and Russia to dismantle their military installations and prevent any country from developing any future technology that would manipulate our atmosphere for political and military objectives. For millions of years the Earth has been protected by our atmosphere. It is being destroyed. What was untouched for millions of years is now being manipulated by the US, Russia and who knows how many other countries. If we don’t stop them Earth will soon look like the Moon - dead.

Royal Raymond Rife was a brilliant scientist born in 1888 and died in 1971. After studying at Johns Hopkins, Rife developed technology which is still commonly used today in the fields of optics, electronics, radiochemistry, biochemistry, ballistics, and aviation. It is a fair statement that Rife practically developed bioelectric medicine himself.

Cancer is caused by microorganisms. Two brilliant research scientists have proven this fact, known since the 1930’s. Yet both scientists were effectively ridiculed and shut down by the AMA and FDA, much like Wallach facing the NIH over Cystic Fibrosis. The “genetic,” “no one knows for sure,” “terminal illness” model works well for the medical/pharmaceutical industry. Works well to the tune of billions of dollars per year! Billions they’d lose if patients could undergo inexpensive treatment with Rife or Clark frequencies and avoid the need for hospitalization, chemo “therapy” drugs, surgery, and most importantly, death.

Royal Raymond Rife, a privately-funded scientist working in the early to mid-1900’s, isolated a cancer-causing virus which he labeled BX. Rife had built a number of high-powered microscopes for his lab work, existing only in his laboratory and later destroyed by his enemies. The closest technology to Rife’s microscopes today is the Grayfield microscope from Germany. With these elaborate microscopes, Rife was able to see living organisms at resolutions only seen (and seen poorly) with electron microscopes. He said that the BX/cancer virus was aerobic, ovoid, purplish-red, granular, and measured about 1/15th of a micron. When BX was injected into laboratory rats, it caused cancer tumors.

Prior to finding the BX cancer virus, Rife developed a method to kill microorganisms called “Harmonic Resonance.” Essentially, Harmonic Resonance involved experimenting to find a frequency that would kill an organism, and then using that frequency on animals/humans to kill the organism while the animal was left unharmed. Rife called the frequency at which a targeted organism would vibrate apart its “Mortal Oscillatory Rate” (MOR), which he found through tedious experimentation on each microbial species. Experimentation on BX showed that waves in the infrared, ultraviolet, and x-ray spectrum would not kill the BX virus, but a certain band of radio waves did. (Traditional medicine uses x-rays to shrink tumors, but often the patient dies anyway, because a tumor is just a symptom of the cancer — not the cause.) In 1934, after he was able to both cause and cure cancer in lab rats using the BX virus and its Mortal Oscillatory Rate, Rife was invited to participate in a landmark study in La Jolla, California. He was asked to cure 16 people with advanced terminal cancer or tuberculosis. (It is thought 14 of them had advanced terminal cancer, 2 had tuberculosis). Within 70 days of treatment with Rife frequencies, 14 of the patients were cured; then three weeks later, the remaining 2 were cured. The total recovery rate using Rife’s technology was 100%.

If a cure was discovered over 70 years ago then why are people still dying of cancer today? The answer is greed. If they allowed a cure to go public then there would be no $billion profits gained from unnecessary treatments and drugs that only guarantee a slow death. Our governments are literally responsible and therefore liable for subjecting cancer patients with unnecessary pain and suffering (the very definition of torture) and for authorizing the use of so called medical treatments that they know have virtually no success rate - resulting in the death of patient. Negligent homicide is a charge brought against people, who by inaction, allow others under their care or presence intentionally to die.

Fluoride is the reduced form of fluorine. Both organic and inorganic compounds containing the element fluorine are considered fluorides. As a halogen, fluorine forms a monovalent ion (−1 charge). Fluorides are a severe toxin and are used to make lethal sarin. Sarin is an extremely toxic substance whose sole application is as a nerve agent. As a chemical weapon, it is classified as a weapon of mass destruction by the United Nations in UN Resolution 687. Production and stockpiling of sarin was outlawed by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993. Sarin is a declared illegal chemical weapon that causes nerve damage yet today sarin is bottled and tubed in a diluted form and sold to millions of unsuspecting consumers. The Nazi regime experimented on Jewish and Soviet prisoners subjecting them both minute and lethal dosages of fluoride. The outcome was always the same - toxic poisoning and death.

The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on Earth was found in Germany`s Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride`s supposed effect on children`s teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission. “At the end of the Second World War, the United States Government sent Charles Elliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany. While there, he was told by German chemists of a scheme which had been worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German General Staff.

“This scheme was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water. In this scheme, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.

“Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual’s power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotising a certain area of the brain, and will thus make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him.

“Germany added fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile.”

Fluoride-containing compounds are so diverse that it is not possible to generalize on their toxicity, which depends on their reactivity and structure, and in the case of salts, their solubility and ability to release fluoride ions. In high concentrations, soluble fluoride salts are toxic and skin or eye contact with high concentrations of many fluoride salts is extremely dangerous. Referring to a common salt of fluoride, NaF, the lethal dose for most adult humans is estimated at 1-10 grams. The lethal dosage for children is a fraction of the adult dosage. A lethal dose is approximately 28 mg per kilogram of body mass.

Like most soluble materials, fluoride compounds are readily absorbed by the intestines and excreted through the urine. Trace amounts are incorporated in bone. Urine tests have been used to ascertain rates of excretion in order to set upper limits in exposure to fluoride compounds and associated detrimental health effects. Ingested fluoride initially acts locally on the intestinal mucosa, where forms hydrofluoric acid in the stomach.

Poisoning comes from ingesting a large amount of fluoride in a short period of time. Poisoning also comes from ingesting small amounts fluoride over a prolonged period of time. Sources of fluoride poisoning include pesticide, rat poisoning, bottled water and toothpaste. Bottled water and toothpaste are ingested by consumers in small amounts yet over time the result it the same - poisoning causing disease and death. Both bottled water and toothpaste are controlled by the FDA (Food and Drug Association). In fact they know that fluoride is a lethal poison yet they are they ones who had the bottled water and toothpaste producers add fluoride to their products. Natural spring water does not have traces of fluoride, it is added in the bottling stage.

As of April 7th, 1997, the United States FDA (Food & Drug Administration) required that all fluoride toothpastes sold in the U.S. carry the following poison warning:

WARNING: Keep out of reach of children under 6 years of age. If you accidentally swallow more than used for brushing, seek professional help or contact a poison control center immediately.

Right on the packaging and tube of toothpaste is a FDA admission that fluoride is a poison and even small amounts can cause severe negative heath symptoms with children.

Consuming even very small amounts of fluoride over years can cause:

* A weakening of bones, leading to an increase in hip and wrist fracture. The National Research Council found evidence about the relative risk of a “continuous exposure-effect” dose-response relationship between fluoride consumption and bone degradation.

* Adverse effects on the kidney. Prolonged consumption of even very small amounts of fluoride will cause adverse effects, and continued intake can cause kidney failure.

* Research has been done on possible liver damage. Researchers have also concluded that fluoride can cause liver damage.

* Chromosomal damage and interference with DNA repair.

* Eepidemiological studies have noted a correlation between fluoride consumption and low IQ. Autism is a brain development disorder characterized by impaired social interaction and communication, and by restricted and repetitive behavior. There is a correlation between fluoride consumption and autism.

* Fluoride’s effect on the thyroid is more severe when iodine is deficient, and fluoride consumption is associated with lower levels of iodine. Thyroid effects in humans were associated with fluoride levels.

* Alzheimer’s disease (AD), also called Alzheimer disease, Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer Type (SDAT) or simply Alzheimer’s, is the most common form of dementia. This incurable, degenerative, and terminal disease was first described by German psychiatrist Alois Alzheimer in 1906. Generally it is diagnosed in people over 65 years of age, although the less-prevalent early-onset Alzheimer’s can occur much earlier. An estimated 26.6 million people worldwide had Alzheimer’s in 2006; this number may quadruple by 2050. Consumption of bottled water and toothpaste are now been investigated as the main culprit that inflicts this incurable, degenerative and terminal disease.

Soluble fluoride salts are toxic and have resulted in both accidental and suicidal deaths from poisoning from even small dosages of fluoride over long periods of time.

Our society as a whole consumes large amounts of fluoride every day. Drinking 8 bottles of water may be good for you but drinking 8 bottles of water laced with fluoride is lethal. How many kids know that they are not suppose to swallow toothpaste as the fluoride in it is lethal? How many children are supervised by their parents when they brush their teeth? Why is the FDA slowly poisoning us? Did governments decide one day that they are god-like and they can choose who lives and who dies? The FDA and any government that endorses or orders that our drinking water and toothpaste be laced with rat poisoning or diluted sarin are guilty of a criminal offense - mass murder. Poisoning that causes death is murder no matter who you are.

What can you and I do to counter the mind controlling and lethal effects of fluoride in our drinking water and toothpaste? Reduce or completely eliminate bottled water and fluoride toothpaste. Until then Calcium is an antidote for fluoride poisoning. Calcium that is found in dairy products like milk, cheese, yogurt and non-dairy products such as all dark green leafy vegetables, nuts and seeds (almonds, brazils, sesame seeds), tofu, and dried fruit are all good sources of calcium for vegetarians.

They’re breakable, contain toxic material, and are becoming increasingly commonplace. But fears of mercury poisoning from new energy-efficient fluorescent bulbs are understated, experts say. Long billed as a “green” product for environmentally conscious consumers, compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) are quickly becoming the norm in household lighting—and may soon replace traditional incandescent bulbs altogether if the public is not made aware of the serious heath hazards associated with them.

Fluorescent light bulbs pose a very serious environmental threat as they are not properly disposed of and end up in landfill sites where the residual toxic mercury seeps into the ground water and contaminates the water supply. CFLs’ cool-burning illumination is made possible by an addition of poison—about five milligrams of mercury sealed inside every glass tube.

Mercury is a potent neurotoxin and long-lived environmental contaminant, and even the small amount present in CFLs poses a very serious environmental and health problem. When the bulbs break, either in the house or at a waste disposal site, their mercury content is released.

Mercury is needed for Fluorescent lamps to produce light, and there are no known substitutes. No mercury is emitted when compact fluorescents are burned, but a small amount is vaporized when they break, which can happen if people screw them in holding the glass instead of the base or drop them.

Mercury can harm the nervous system of a fetus or young child if ingested in low-level quantity.

In a Maine study, researchers shattered 65 compact fluorescents to test air quality and cleanup methods. They found that, in many cases, immediately after the bulb was broken - and sometimes even after a cleanup was attempted - levels of mercury vapor exceeded federal guidelines for chronic exposure by as much as 100 times.

“We found some very high levels [of mercury] even after we tried a number of cleanup techniques,” said Mark Hyland, director of Maine’s Bureau of Remediation and Waste Management.

The US Environmental Protection Agency and the states of Massachusetts and Vermont said that, based on a Maine study, they are revising their recommendations for where to use compact fluorescents in a home and how to clean up when one breaks.

The study recommended that if a compact fluorescent breaks, get children and pets out of the room. Ventilate the room. Never use a vacuum, even on a rug, to clean up a broken compact fluorescent lamps. Instead, use stiff paper such as index cards and tape to pick up pieces, and then wipe the area with a wet wipe or damp paper towel. If there are young children or pregnant woman in the house, consider cutting out the piece of carpet where the lamp broke as a precaution. Place the shards and cleanup debris in a glass jar with a screw top and remove the jar from the house.

Sounds like a serious threat to our health. Why would anyone use a Fluorescent light bulb when it posses such a serious environmental and health threat? Compact fluorescents can contain from 1 to 30 milligrams of mercury, according to the Mercury Policy Project. The nonprofit cited a New Jersey study that estimated that about 2 to 4 tons of the element are released into the environment in the United States each year from compact fluorescents. Incandescent light bulbs are the safest light source in existence. There is no toxic poison added to the bulb.

Despite what is being claimed, the ordinary incandescent light bulb is a very efficient source of energy. For those of us in the northern climates it can actually reduce our home heating bill. Compared to a baseboard heater that consumes anywhere from 750 to 2200 watts of electricity (not very energy efficient) the light bulb only consumes 40 to 100 watts (very efficient). Try this out for a few weeks. In the room(s) that has a chill in it and where you are always turning up the baseboard heater thermostat, leave a light on - one with a 100-watt incandescent light bulb. If there is a draft from one of the windows place a lamp on a stand in front of the window - instead of turning the heat up. The draft will distribute the energy efficient hot heat (will burn your hand if you try to touch a light bulb on) from the light bulb. You won’t have to set the thermostat so high any longer if you leave the light on - incandescent only. You won’t be victims of toxic mercury poisoning that a Fluorescent light bulb poses. Mercury poisoning from Fluorescent light bulb can affect our kidney, liver and our brain. Long-term exposure to mercury can result in symptoms that get progressively worse and lead to personality changes, stupor, and coma.

Don’t believe Mercury poisoning from Fluorescent light bulbs poses a serious health threat

At first the doctors didn’t think anything was seriously wrong with Maya Bailey. But her parents, Chris and Virginia Bailey, soon knew otherwise. They watched helplessly as their once-vivacious toddler became a listless 18-month-old who stumbled and fell out of her chair. Maya could sleep only for an hour or two before waking up sweat soaked and screaming. Her hands and feet turned bright red. Then the red splotches on her hands became deep sores, which also spread to her mouth. Her teeth started to fall out, as did her fingernails. Worst of all, breathing became excruciatingly painful, especially at night. Still, all four pediatricians the Baileys consulted were stumped. What was making Maya so sick?

Her body was failing at a terrifyingly fast rate by the time she was admitted to the hospital, three months after her parents first noticed her strange symptoms. By then her lungs were so weak she could breathe only with the help of a ventilator. In desperation her doctors put her in a drug-induced coma to keep her perfectly still. But they remained baffled about her mysterious illness.

Then Maya’s luck changed: William Banner, M.D., Ph.D., walked into her hospital room. Dr. Banner had received advanced training in toxicology, pediatrics and critical care. He looked at Maya’s red hands and feet, felt her wobbly teeth (she had already lost 10) and studied her labored breathing. Then he made a diagnosis: mercury poisoning. Tests later confirmed that her body contained 15 times more mercury than normal, easily enough to kill her in a few more days without the proper treatment.

“The fetal brain is so sensitive, even low-level exposures can have an effect,” says Joseph Jacobson, Ph.D, co-author of mercury hazards report released by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in July 2000.

How much mercury do power plants emit to light a CFL?

About 50 percent of the electricity produced in the U.S. is generated by coal-fired power plants. When coal burns to produce electricity, mercury naturally contained in the coal releases into the air. In 2006, coal-fired power plants produced 1,971 billion kilowatt hours (kwh) of electricity, emitting 50.7 tons of mercury into the air—the equivalent amount of mercury contained in more than 9 billion CFLs.

President Obama on Tuesday left open the possibility of criminal prosecution for Bush administration officials who drew up the legal basis for interrogation techniques that many view as torture.

President Obama said it will be up to Attorney General Eric Holder to decide whether or not to prosecute the former officials.

“With respect to those who formulated those legal decisions, I would say that is going to be more a decision for the attorney general within the parameter of various laws, and I don’t want to prejudge that,” Obama said during a meeting with Jordan’s King Abdullah at the White House.

The president added that any congressional “accounting of what took place” should be done “in a bipartisan fashion outside of the typical hearing process that can sometimes break down … entirely along party lines.”

It is important, he said, for the “American people to feel as if this is not being dealt with to provide one side or another political advantage.”

“This has been a difficult chapter in our history and one of [my] tougher decisions,” he added. The techniques listed in memos “reflected … us losing our moral bearings.”

TORTURE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Being Subjected to Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1975)

Article 1
1. For the purpose of this Declaration, torture means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted by or at the instigation of a public official on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or confession, punishing him for an act he has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating him or other persons. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions to the extent consistent with the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners.

2. Torture constitutes an aggravated and deliberate form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)
Article 7
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984)
Article 1
For the purposes of this Convention, the term “torture” means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.

This article is without prejudice to any international instrument or national legislation which does or may contain provisions of wider application

US Code
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113C > § 2340
§ 2340. Definitions

(1) “torture” means an act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering upon another person within his custody or physical control;
(2) “severe mental pain or suffering” means the prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from—
(A) the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering;
(B) the administration or application, or threatened administration or application, of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality;
(C) the threat of imminent death; or
(D) the threat that another person will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the administration or application of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality; and
(3) “United States” means the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the commonwealths, territories, and possessions of the United States.

US Code
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113C > § 2340A
§ 2340A. Torture

(a) Offense.— Whoever outside the United States commits or attempts to commit torture shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and if death results to any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life.
(b) Jurisdiction.— There is jurisdiction over the activity prohibited in subsection (a) if—
(1) the alleged offender is a national of the United States; or
(2) the alleged offender is present in the United States, irrespective of the nationality of the victim or alleged offender.
(c) Conspiracy.— A person who conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties (other than the penalty of death) as the penalties prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.

Hillary Clinton is among the most corrupt politicians in the US history. She devised a scheme to sell taxpayer financed trade missions to Communist China in exchange for campaign contributions. She presided over the theft of the private FBI files of former Reagan and Bush staffers. She led the campaign to slander the women sexually and otherwise abused by President Clinton, and has lied time and time again to investigators, to her colleagues, to the press and to the American people.

Hillary Clinton has recently launched another illegal fundraising campaign to pay off her debt she incurred when she lost her bid for the Democratic nominee for president of the United States. Fundraising efforts are now curtailed now that Hillary Clinton is secretary of state and becomes covered by the Hatch Act, which regulates political involvement by federal employees. A 2001 advisory opinion by the federal Office of Special Counsel said a federal employee with a campaign debt would be prohibited from “personally soliciting, accepting or receiving political contributions.” That means Clinton’s political committee could keep raising money to pay off her creditors, but without her direct involvement.

Today the Democratic Party is sending out emails soliciting donations to pay off Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign debt.

Email from the democraticparty@democrats.org:

“I wanted to pass along an exciting opportunity to stand up for an important leader in our party, Hillary Clinton.”

Jen

The fact that the Democratic Party is soliciting funds to pay “directly” towards Hillary’s personal debt makes this solicitation illegal as she is 100% involved - she personally benefits 100% from this illegal fundraising campaign as she would be accepting and receiving all political contributions made through this illegal fundraising. Furthermore Clinton is trying to pay off her debts from the Democratic primaries, where many of her supporters already gave the maximum $2,300 per person. They cannot be solicited again. A conflict-of-interest exists here too. Hillary Clinton is directly involved in this fundraising as she is pimping her husband impeached Bill Clinton as the grand prize - “you could win one of three exciting opportunities, including spending a day with former President Bill Clinton”.

Three elements make up an illegal promotion:

1. Prize is any benefit, cash or property awarded to a winner. (”you could win one of three exciting opportunities, including spending a day with former President Bill Clinton”)

2. Chance means the winner is chosen by “luck” with little or no skill or ability involved. (”I wanted to pass along an exciting opportunity to stand up for an important leader in our party, Hillary Clinton.”)

3. Consideration is the exchange of something of value for the opportunity to participate in the game. (”Make a donation of $5 or more now to win one of these once-in-a-lifetime opportunities.”)

In 2009, Hillary Clinton was nominated and approved by the Senate to serve as the Secretary of State for President Barack Obama in violation of the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution. She is constitutionality ineligible to serve as Secretary of State because the pay for that office was increased while she was serving in Congress. The Twenty-seventh Amendment provides that any change in Congressional salaries may only take effect after the beginning of the next term of office for Representatives. Sometimes called the “Congressional Compensation Amendment of 1789”, the “Congressional Pay Amendment”, and the “Madison Amendment”, it was intended to serve as a restraint on the power of Congress to set its own salary—an obvious potential for conflict of interest.

The first time Hillary Clinton campaigned for the Senate in New York, she violated campaign finance laws by failing to report almost $2 million in contributions. Senator Clinton and her campaign team conspired to defraud the U.S. Senate and the Federal Election Commission (FEC) by failing to report the true cost of a $2 million Hollywood campaign fundraising event in August 2000.

Federal ethics rules

Basic Principle: Avoid Undue Influence

General Rule concerning Bribes and Salary Supplementation. You may not receive anything of value from a non-Federal source for taking action or failing to take action in your Government position. You also may not accept payment for performing your official duties from a source other than the Government.

General Rule concerning Personal Gifts from Non-Federal Sources.

You may not accept gifts from a person or firm that has a contract, a grant, or other business with the Department or is seeking such business; is regulated by the Department; is seeking action by Commerce; or has interests that may be affected by performance of your duties. You also may not accept gifts given to you because of your Government position. Gifts to your spouse or minor children are considered gifts to you in most circumstances.

Basic Principle: Avoid Divided Loyalties

General Rule on Outside Activities. You may not engage in outside employment or any other outside activity that conflicts with your Government position, including employment that requires disqualification from significant duties and activities that create an appearance of using your public office for private gain. (Disqualification is required from matters affecting private employers.)

The Clintons are engaging in illegal campaign fund raising. The elections are over. The Clintons are soliciting funds from the American public for her own personal gain? Any funds collected via this fund raising campaign can be construed as supplementing the salary of the Secretary of State. Another instance of the Clintons placing themselves above the law. Another instance of the Clintons abusing their office for their own personal gain.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

The US wouldn’t be in the mess it is in if the US people had a real choice. Obama campaigned and won on the slogan of “Change”. The US people are still waiting for the promised change. They only elected Obama because of this promise. What the US people didn’t realize is that they were getting only a change in who is president of the United States. Everything else is the same. It will remain the same until the US people make real leadership changes themselves.

The root of the problem is the US government - specifically who makes up the US government. Doesn’t anyone else notice that in every election the US people are voting for the same people? Each and every time its the same people running for office to fill the government jobs in the US Congress and Senate. The only change is the party name for the next 4 years. The same people who have been known to or who were actually caught engaging in criminal activities are running for office and the US people are electing them time and again.

George W Bush proved time and again that he failed at leadership with one failed business venture after another and yet the US people allowed this failure to lead the country. The Clintons is another example of re-electing corrupt people. How many times did both Bill and Hillary obstruct justice? Bill Clinton was actually impeached. Hillary was the 1st First Lady to ever be subpoenaed to testify in a criminal investigation lodged against her and her husband and today she is Secretary of State. The US people need and demand law abiding experience, not criminal experience.

Obama is definitely not the change the US people need or wanted. He too is corrupt. Obama was being investigated for illegally receiving kickbacks from a real-estate scam, right up until he was elected president. Obama engaged in a financial scam and now he is the one spending the US people’s money. How much is he taking in kickbacks from the banks (every one contributed $millions to his campaign) that he is now supposedly helping stay out of bankruptcy?

In order to bring about a real change - a revolution - the US people must stop electing the same people. There needs to be new, reputable and law abiding candidates for every new and future elections. The US people no longer can afford to re-elect the same people over and over. If they did nothing for you the first time in office then it is time to elect someone else. Evolution can only evolve with change - out with the old and in with the new. Change doesn’t mean shuffling. Change doesn’t mean electing the same senators or governors year after year. If you want change you have to start with your own community and state. Change means electing a different party to office. It means refusing to elect either a Democrat or a Republican. It means giving new candidates a chance by stop voting for those who have surpassed retirement age. As of January 24, 2009, the average age of U.S. Senators is 62. 1 Senator is in his 90s, 3 are in their 80s, 19 are in their 70s, 36 are in their 60s. Most have been senators most of their political careers.

To fix the root of the US problem you have to replace those who no longer perform their duties. You have the replace the rotten ones. You have to replace the worn out ones. You have to change by replacing them with brand new ones with new ideas, new solutions, new energy, new dedication, new dreams and new hopes. You have to bring in new ones who will work 110% to get the job done. You have to bring in people with no criminal record, ones with morals and ethics, ones who can’t be bought. You have to bring in people who are educated and who actually know what they are talking about. You have to bring in people who know how to handle money. You have to bring in people who are most of all law-abiding. Only then will the US people have the change they need, want and truly deserve.

Last week US citizens used a tax day “tea party” to voice their displeasure with President Obama’s spending policies just steps from the White House. The message they were sending turned out to be more sophisticated than anything seen in decades of anti-tax activism.

“I have never seen a taxpayer movement and a citizens’ anti-big-government movement that came before the pain of the tax increase. Usually it’s the tax increase that gets people riled up,” said protester Grover Norquist.

“These are people unhappy because the spending has happened and they know the pain is coming, and the demonstrations are hitting before the tax increases hit,” Norquist said. “When President Obama actually has to spell out how he’s paying for all these goodies that he gave to his campaign contributors, the size of the demonstrations are going to be significantly larger.”

“A couple months ago, I was thinking that maybe Obama didn’t understand the Constitution. And a couple months into his administration, I’m thinking he doesn’t understand mathematics,” said Mark Trapp, wielding a homemade sign next to his young daughter. “There is a large portion of the population that is just discontent. With everything. And it’s not a Democrat thing, it’s not a Republican thing; it’s more a restraint on government.”

“The country that I signed up to serve is not the country I just got out of the military for. Everything that’s going on today is just completely opposite of what I was raised to believe about this country,” said John Jones, an Air Force veteran headed to college in the fall.

“I don’t want to have anything to do with what we’re involved in anymore,” Jones, a Pashto linguist in the Air Force who hails from Falmouth, Maine, added.

“I suspect the weenies in Congress will pretend that they’re not paying attention, but they’ll be even more moderate,” said Ms. McDonald. “I guess as long as we keep pushing, things may improve, so it depends on how many people there are and how many congressmen are interested in being reelected again.”

Ordinary US citizens held up damp signs—“Stop Tyranny, Preserve Freedom”, “Stop Stealing Our Kids’ Future,” “Say No To Socialism”—and occasionally bursting into chants of “U.S.A.” and “NoBama” - all opposing the President’s economic policies.

“I think the government stopped listening to us, and if people my age don’t come out and support this type of movement to get the government listening to us again it won’t get traction,” said Derrick, 21, who counted increased taxes for the wealthy and illegal immigration as two of his biggest concerns. “We need to show our representatives that there are people who care about the direction of our country.”

Rachel Hoff, 26, of the Young Republican National Federation, said she was there primarily out of opposition to federal spending. “Democrats pushed it over the edge, I think, with continued bailouts and continued stimulus bills, and that inspired people to activism.”

The peaceful tea party protest in Washington, D.C., outside the White House was shut down by police. Evidence of another president trampling on the rights of the US people. They have the Constitutional right to protest. They have this right, which is guaranteed by the supreme law of the United Stated of America - the US Constitution, and Obama is trying to illegally suspend this right. Any and all government officials, including the president of the United States can be removed from office for crimes such as these.

Article Two of the United States Constitution (Section 4) states that “The President, Vice President, and all other civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Violations of the United States Constitution are considered High Crimes and Misdemeanors. Suspension of habeas corpus is a crime. Usurpations of the US people’s rights and freedoms are crimes. In the United States, the Bill of Rights is the name by which the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution (the supreme law) are known. The Bill of Rights prohibits (making it illegal) Congress from making any law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise therof, forbids infringement of the right to keep and bear arms, by Congress or citizens in a federal territory and prohibits the federal government from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. In addition, the Bill of Rights states that “the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people,” and reserves all powers not granted to the federal government to the citizenry or States.

Amendments - no government can deny any of these rights. It is therefore a criminal act to make any new laws that usurp these guaranteed rights

* First Amendment – Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause; freedom of speech, of the press, Freedom of Religion, and of assembly; right to petition,

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

* Second Amendment – Militia (United States), Sovereign state, Law of Arms.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [6][7]

* Third Amendment – Protection from quartering of troops.

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

* Fourth Amendment – Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

* Fifth Amendment – due process, double jeopardy, self-incrimination, eminent domain.

No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

* Sixth Amendment – Trial by jury and rights of the accused; Confrontation Clause, speedy trial, public trial, right to counsel

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

* Seventh Amendment – Civil trial by jury.

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

* Eighth Amendment – Prohibition of excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment.

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

* Ninth Amendment – Protection of rights not specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

* Tenth Amendment – Powers of States and people.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The US protested against the Viet Cong use of torture tactics like this on US POWs. Many lives were lost sending US troops to free their POWs from such barbaric treatment, yet today Obama has decided to allow the US CIA to continue to use the same illegal barbaric tactics..

A prisoner of war (POW) is a combatant who is held in continuing custody by an enemy (US) power during or immediately after an armed conflict.

For most of human history, depending on the culture of the victors, combatants on the losing side in a battle could expect to be either slaughtered, to eliminate them as a future threat, or enslaved, bringing economic and social benefits to the victorious side and its soldiers.

To be entitled to prisoner-of-war status, captured service members must be lawful combatants entitled to combatant’s privilege—which gives them immunity from punishment for crimes constituting lawful acts of war, e.g., killing enemy troops. The criteria are generally applicable to international armed conflicts.

Chapter II of the Annex to the 1907 Hague Convention covered the treatment of prisoners of war in detail. These were further expanded in the Third Geneva Convention of 1929, and its revision of 1949. Article 4 of the Third Geneva Convention protects captured military personnel, some guerrilla fighters and certain civilians. It applies from the moment a prisoner is captured until he or she is released or repatriated. One of the main provisions of the convention makes it illegal to torture prisoners and states that a prisoner can only be required to give their name, date of birth, rank and service number (if applicable).

During the 20th century, Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany were notorious for atrocities against prisoners during World War II. The German military used the Soviet Union’s refusal to sign the Geneva Convention as a reason for not providing the necessities of life to Russian POWs. North Korean and North Vietnamese forces routinely killed or mistreated prisoners taken during those conflicts. Today the US is the ones committing atrocities against prisoners taken in their “War of Terror”. From the day George W Bush and Dick Cheney launched their “War of Terror” with their illegal unprovoked, unjustified and unwarranted attack against Afghanistan and then Iraq, to present day, the US has routinely killed and mistreated prisoners taken during those conflicts and from CIA kidnapping and rendition of foreign civilians.

The Code of the U.S. Fighting Force is a code of conduct that is an “ethical guide” and a United States Department of Defense directive consisting of six articles to members of the U.S. armed forces addressing how U.S. personnel in combat should act when they must “evade capture, resist while a prisoner or escape from the enemy.” Just as you have a responsibility to your country under the Code of Conduct, the United States government has an equal responsibility—to keep faith with you and stand by you as you fight for your country. If you are unfortunate enough to become a prisoner of war, you may rest assured that your government will care for your dependents and will never forget you. Furthermore, the government will use every practical means to contact, support and gain release for you and for all other prisoners of war. The Geneva Convention recognizes that a POW may have the duty to attempt escape. In fact, the Geneva Convention prohibits a captor nation from executing a POW simply for attempting escape.

Contrary to the spirit of the Geneva Convention, U.S. forces have regarded the POW compound as an extension of the battlefield. In doing so, they have used a variety of tactics and pressures, including physical and mental mistreatment, torture and medical neglect, to exploit POWs for US propaganda purposes, to obtain military information or to undermine POW organization, communication and resistance.

Every POW should recognize that any confession signed or any statement made may be used by the enemy as a false evidence that the person is a “war criminal” rather than a POW. The US has made reservations to the Geneva Convention in which they assert that a “war criminal” conviction deprives the convicted individual of prisoner-of-war status, removes that person from protection under the Geneva Convention and revokes all rights to repatriation until a prison sentence is served. There is concrete evidence that US president Obama is a war criminal as he too advocates the violation of the Geneva Convention by authorizing the US CIA and US troops to continue to use a variety of unlawful tactics and pressures, including physical and mental mistreatment and torture on captured combatants and kidnapped foreign civilians.

Beneath his seemingly boundless charisma and charm, Barack Obama has always been an utterly ruthless politician. He has been a compromiser who has danced with the darkest forces of political and criminal power, while winning over common people; a consensus-abiding chameleon and a “pragmatist”. Obama is the true model of what George W. Bush only claimed to be: “a uniter, not a divider”.

The signs were clear from the early days of the presidential contest that Obama was, like every presidential candidate, a handpicked puppet. His cadre of national security and foreign policy advisors included the most notorious war criminals, intelligence/security “advisors” and corrupt think tank assets in the world. His campaign was bankrolled by Wall Street, and big corporations. His policy agenda was taken from the playbook of the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. Both neoliberal elite power and money coalesced behind Obama, as his political rivals dropped off.

Obama’s record in the US Senate was one of general complicity with Bush/Cheney and the status quo, including enthusiastic support of the consensus “war on terrorism” deception and the big 9/11 lie. Former US congresswoman Cynthia McKinney has described how, in her encounters with Obama, the senator from Illinois repeatedly refused to act in opposition to Bush/Cheney policies. During his days in the Senate, and throughout the presidential campaign, Obama has fully supported the Bush/Cheney administration on the Patriot Act, and the wholesale militarization and criminalization of the United States.

Destabilization

The naïve, the hopeful and the ignorant have continued to harbor fantasies about “change”, even as Obama promptly destroyed every single hope, starting with the composition of his administration. He hand picked a transition team, and then a cabinet consisting entirely of legendary war criminals and corrupt elites, each more malodorous and corrupt than the next. From Iran-Contra participant Robert Gates and war criminal Richard Holbrooke, to Hillary Clinton and an economic advisory team comprised of the architects of Wall Street destruction, including Paul Volcker, Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, and new Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

Under Geithner and Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke, the Ponzi scheme that is Wall Street, the wholesale robbery of the American people begun by Alan Greenspan, Bernanke, and Bush/Cheney Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson has not only continued unabated, but has metastasized with each new bailout, and every new fraud orchestrated by Geithner.

While the people on “Main Street” have continued to suffer a new Great Depression without real assistance from the Obama administration, the New World Order’s financial coffers continue to fill with stolen US taxpayer money. No relief for the impoverished, while the administration “bails out” banks and Wall Street, under such frauds as the “Public Private Partnership Program”. Leaving the wolves in charge of the financial henhouse, Geithner and the Obama administration authorized Congress to toss out securities pricing standards on “toxic assets”. Essentially, the Obama administration is simply going to let the banks and financial institutions, that created the crisis with their massive Ponzi schemes, determine how they wish to price their own “toxic assets”. This move, not surprisingly, sparked a huge Wall Street rally. Some even hailed it as the end of the crisis.

A criminal stimulus plan

Obama’s so-called stimulus package is yet another Trojan horse. As exhaustively and incisively detailed by Michel Chossudovsky in “America’s Fiscal Collapse”:

“This is a ‘War Budget’. The austerity measures hit all major federal spending programs with the exception of:

1. Defence and the Middle East War:
2. the Wall Street bank bailout,
3. Interest payments on a staggering public debt.

“The Obama stimulus program constitutes a continuation of the Bush administration’s bank bailout packages. The proposed policy solution to the crisis becomes the cause, ultimately resulting in further real economy bankruptcies and a corresponding collapse of the standard of living of Americans.

“Both the Bush and Obama bank bailouts are intended to come to the rescue of troubled financial institutions, to ensure the payment of ‘inter-bank’ debt operations. In practice, large amounts of money transit through the banking system, from the banks to the hedge funds, to offshore banking havens and back to the banks.

What we are dealing with is the fraudulent transfer and confiscation of lifelong savings and pension funds, the fraudulent appropriation of tax revenues to finance the bank bailouts, etc. To understand what has happened: follow the money trail of electronic transfers with a view to establishing where the money has gone. What is at stake is the outright criminalization of the financial system: ‘financial theft’ on an unprecedented scale. “The monetary system, which is integrated into the State budgetary process, has been destabilized.”

Bush/Cheney’s war is also Obama’s war

On March 27, 2009, Obama launched his “new strategy for Afghanistan”. This new strategy is a continuation and more aggressive expansion of the Bush/Cheney war plan, hatched in the wake of the false flag operation of 9/11, utilizing the identical “war on terrorism” and 9/11 lies as justification.

Obama: “I want the American people to understand that we have a clear and focused goal: to disrupt, dismantle and defeat Al-Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan and to prevent their return to either country in the future. That is a cause that could not be more just. “I remind everybody, the United States did not choose to fight a war in Afghanistan. Nearly 3,000 of our people were killed on Sept. 11, 2001, for doing nothing more than going about their daily lives.”

The consensus “Al-Qaeda” deception is not only alive and well under Obama, it is now the justification for a surge of 21,000 US troops into Afghanistan, massive covert operations throughout Central Asia and the Middle East, and an even more aggressive “war on terrorism”. This is the conquest of the “Grand Chessboard” that the Anglo-American elites wanted to execute after 9/11, but “squandered” due to the Bush/Cheney administration’s “fumble” in Iraq.

Under executive orders issued by Obama recently, the CIA still has authority to carry out what are known as renditions, secret abductions and transfers of prisoners to countries that cooperate with the United States.

Current and former U.S. intelligence officials said that the rendition program might be poised to play an expanded role going forward because it was the main remaining mechanism — aside from Predator missile strikes — for taking suspected terrorists off the street.

The rendition program became a source of embarrassment for the CIA, and a target of international scorn, as details emerged in recent years of botched captures, mistaken identities and allegations that prisoners were turned over to countries where they were tortured.

President Barack Obama absolved CIA officers from prosecution for toturing of terror suspects Thursday, even as his administration released Bush-era memos graphically detailing and authorizing torture of POWs and suspected terrorists. The FBI and the courts have already stated that what the CIA was doing is torture - banned by US and International Law - yet Obama has officially gone on record stating that he will not prosecute anyone for torture. Obama, in fact, has authorized the CIA to restart its renditions, secret abductions and torturing of foreign and US citizens. The US people, so desperate for change, expected a dove but got a bloodthirsty wolf.

Police pepper spray, beat and arrest peaceful protesters exercising their First Amendment - protest of the Democratic National Convention in Denver on Monday, Aug. 25, 2008 where Democrats officially nominated Obama for President and Biden for Vice President of the United States.

Obama says in a court appeal that the US has the right to hold prisoners without trial. “It would be really inconvenient right now for the U.S. military to have to defend holding prisoners for years without charge or trial, and it has more important things to do, like fight a war on terror.” That is the same argument the Bush administration used when it said that prisoners at Guantanamo Bay didn’t have habeas rights? When Obama was campaigning for the presidency he stated that he rejects “a false choice between fighting terrorism and respecting habeas corpus?” Obama said repeatedly and unequivocally as a senator and as a presidential candidate that he thought Gitmo prisoners deserved the right to challenge their detention in a U.S. court, because the procedures offered to them at Guantanamo were woefully inadequate. Now as president of the United States he has personally petitioned the court to suspend the Writ of Habeas Corpus.

The Constitution of the United States
Section. 9.
The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

Obama seeks to suspend the Writ of Habeas Corpus. An attack against the US Constitution. There is no rebellion ongoing in the US. There hasn’t been an invasion of the US. The attacks of September 11, 2001 were criminal acts not an act of war. Hijacking is a criminal act. No foreign army, navy or air force attacked the US on 9/11. US owned commercial airlines were hijacked. Commercial airlines are not military aircraft.

The US Constitution strictly forbids the suspension of Habeas Corpus then, now or any time in the future. Under no circumstances can the writ of Habeas Corpus be suspended. The US Constitution closes any loopholes in this law by adding “No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.” A bill of attainder (also known as an act or writ of attainder) is an act of the legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a trial. Bills of attainder are forbidden by Article I, section 9, clause 3 of the United States Constitution. Ex post facto is most typically used to refer to a law that applies retroactively, thereby criminalizing conduct that was legal when originally performed. Two clauses in the US Constitution prohibit ex post facto laws: Art 1, § 9 and Art. 1 § 10.

It looks like another criminal has taken control of the US White House. It looks like another criminal has violated his oath of office with another attack against the US Constitution. If he is allowed to suspend the Writ of Habeas Corpus for POWs he will no doubt claim he has the right to suspend the US Constitution and declared Writ of Habeas Corpus for US citizens too. He will argue that if he has the presidential authority to suspend Writ of Habeas Corpus for POWs then he also has the presidential authority to suspend Writ of Habeas Corpus for citizens of the US. All he has to do is declare US dissidents, protesters, the press or anyone who petitions the Government for a redress of grievances as enemy combatants or terrorists. Obama is like Bush. Both are taking away your rights and freedoms. Both have directly attacked the US Constitution which both took an oath to uphold and defend.

The only real requirement to be the president of the United States of America is to solemnly swear (or affirm) that the person seeking the highest office of the US government will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of his or her ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. If that person does do not take the oath of Office then that person cannot be the president of the United States. If that person dishonors the oath that person no longer has the right to be or claim to be the president of the United States of America. Throughout his or her term in office, as president of the United States of America, the president is under oath and bound to the oath for the entire term of office. No president can simply decide to dishonor their oath of office. The US Constitution is the supreme law of the United States. It declares “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” The president works for the people. “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” He or she took an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. When they took the office of the president of the United States of America they entered into a contract with the people. Dishonoring the oath of office is a breach of contract. It is the unalienable right and duty of the US people to fire such Government, and to hire someone else who is capable of honoring their contract and preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Article written by PAUL W KINCAID

As Martin Luther grew in his appreciation of the gospel, he also grew in his recognition that the Papacy is the Antichrist. The Antichrist, according to Christianity, is one who fulfills Biblical prophecies concerning an adversary of Christ while resembling him in a deceptive manner. This Man of Sin will possess a number of characteristics. These include “sitting in the temple”, opposing himself against anything that is worshiped, claiming divine authority, working all kinds of counterfeit miracles and signs, and doing all kinds of evil. The Pope has all of these characteristics. The Vatican is considered a castle by some, a temple by most. The Pope does not live, walk, sleep, sit, worship and breath the air of Holy Land but instead lives in a temple where he sits as the head of a state within a state - that state is the Vatican City. The Pope (from Latin: “papa” or “father” from Greek πάπας, pápas, “papa”, Papa in Italian) is the Bishop of Rome and as such is the leader of the Catholic Church. The Roman Catholic faith was created not by the teachings and followings of Jesus Christ but by the Roman Emperor Constantine (a pagan sun worshipper), 300 years after the Romans put Jesus Christ to death. There is no Apostolic Succession (succession of bishops, in uninterrupted lines, that is historically traceable back to the original twelve Apostles.) as claimed by the Vatican (it is one of four elements which define their false claim to be the true Church of Jesus Christ”) because of the fact that the Roman Catholic religion was not created by any of the original twelve Apostles, for they had all died some 300 years prior to the creation of the Roman Catholic faith. For 300 years the Romans set out to destroy Christianity first by destroying all Christian Scriptures (as a result scholars do not know the exact year or date of Jesus’ birth or death), then slaughtering millions of Christians, and finally by decree by Roman Emperor Constantine. Constantine did not declare that Christianity was the new state religion he declared that Roman Catholicism was the new state religion. The title “Vicar of Christ” refers to the Pope’s claims of divine authority. The Second Vatican Council confirmed the titles “Vicar of Christ” and “Successor of Peter” or “Successor of the Prince of the Apostles” as titles of the pope. Today the Vatican officially teaches that the Pope is the substitute (anti) for Christ Jesus or anti-Christ. ‘For the Roman Pontiff, by reason of his office as Vicar of Christ, and as pastor of the entire Church has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, a power which he can always exercise.” The pope has shed more innocent blood than any other head of state that has ever existed among mankind. The papacy still claims that it has a right to slaughter so-called “heretics,” as it did in the Dark Ages. “The Vatican says that she has a right to punish with the confiscation of their goods, or the penalty of death, those who differ in faith from the Pope.” Since Emperor Constantine declared by decree the formation of the Roman Catholic Church they have waged wars and slaughtered millions under the IHS monogram. Christians are deceived into thinking that IHS is a monogram of the name of Jesus. From the very beginning of the Roman Catholic Church ( with the Edict of Milan in 313 AD which mandated toleration of Christians in the Roman Empire) IHS is the abbreviation for In hoc signo vinces (Latin) which translated in English means “in this sign you will conquer”. He united this pagan Sol Invictus cult (Sun worshipping cult aka Sunday) with Christianity or what was left of Christianity after the last great pagan persecution to form the Roman Catholic Church with himself as Roman Pontiff

“The Pope is the very Antichrist who has exalted himself above and opposed himself against Christ because he will not permit Christians to be saved. It is nothing else than the devil himself because above and against God he urges and disseminates his Papal falsehoods concerning Masses, Purgatory, the monastic life, one’s own works, fictitious divine worship which is the very Papacy and condemns, murders and tortures all Christians who do not exalt and honor these abominations of the Pope above all things, therefore just as little as we can worship the devil himself as Lord and God, we can endure his apostle the Pope. For to lie and to kill and destroy body and soul eternally, that is wherein his Papal government really consists.” - Martin Luther King

I have a dream

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.” I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slaveowners will be able to sit down together at a table of brotherhood. I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a desert state, sweltering with the heat of injustice and oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice. I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I have a dream today.

I have a dream that one day the state of Alabama, whose governor’s lips are presently dripping with the words of interposition and nullification, will be transformed into a situation where little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls and walk together as sisters and brothers. I have a dream today. I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together. This is our hope. This is the faith with which I return to the South. With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.

This will be the day when all of God’s children will be able to sing with a new meaning, “My country, ’tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim’s pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring.” And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania! Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado! Let freedom ring from the curvaceous peaks of California! But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia! Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee! Let freedom ring from every hill and every molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring.

When we let freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, “Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!”

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

The US government, both the Bush administration and the Obama administration are deemed lawless governments by the US Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution. Both Bush and Obama have assumed, without lawful authority, to exercise powers not granted, allowed, permitted or sanctioned by US law. The USA Patriot Act is a gross violation of the United States law - the US Constitution. It violates every Amendment of the Bill of Rights - amendments to the Constitution of the United States. The Patriot Act clearly violates the US supreme law, the US Constitution. The Patriot Act clearly is in violation of the First Amendment - Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause; freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly; right to petition, Fourth Amendment - Protection from unreasonable search and seizure, Fifth Amendment - due process, double jeopardy, self-incrimination, eminent domain, Sixth Amendment - Trial by jury and rights of the accused; Confrontation Clause, speedy trial, public trial, right to counsell, Seventh Amendment - Civil trial by jury, Eighth Amendment - Prohibition of excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment, Ninth Amendment - Protection of rights not specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights and Tenth Amendment - Powers of states and people.

The formation of the Department of Homeland Security is also a gross violation of the United States law - the US Constitution. The lawless US government violated the law by creating an independent agency vested with civil powers not granted to it in the Constitution. The Bush administration and the Obama administration have both violated the law by unlawfully granting, without legal authority, the US Treasury Department extended powers and jurisdiction not specifically granted by the US Constitution. Both Bush and Obama unlawfully coerced, by terrorism and unlawful proclamation of presidential authority, the US Congress to give $trillions to the US White House to use at their discretion and without any congressional or legal oversight.

Civil governments lawfully exist only at the behest of the people. Civil government cannot create or perpetuate itself without running roughshod over the basis of our political system. Civil government may not reorganize itself for the sake of expediency. Likewise, the federal government may exercise only those civil powers that are specifically granted to it in the Constitution. If a power is not granted, the general government does not possess it and therefore may not act as though it does possess it. Congress may not exercise jurisdiction not extended nor may it vest independent agencies with such jurisdiction.

The separation of federal power into three constitutionally defined branches permits no combination of the power of those branches in an independent agency or commission. In short, it permits no fourth branch of general government, independent or otherwise, to be created by the government.

President Bush and President Obama are both guilty of abuse of power and gross violation of the law with the unlawful creation, by their governments, of independent agencies or commissions. The agencies and commissions created by both Bush and Obama were created illegally. Both created agencies and commissions that unlawfully combine the powers of the separate branches of federal power. Obama claims to have the power to control the purse strings to handle the US economic crisis. He claims to have the authority to dictate how the US federal dollars are spent. He claims to have the power to force the private sector to comply with his demands or be dissolved. Obama has no such powers. The US Congress has control over the purse strings as declared by the supreme law of the United States - the US Constitution. Obama does not have, was never granted, any such financial powers. Obama cannot force a private sector company to declare bankruptcy. Obama cannot dictate how much Congress gives him for the US fiscal budget or for illegal private banks bailouts or for war. Obama cannot grant the Treasure Secretary extended jurisdiction. Obama most certainly cannot grant anyone or any agency or commission of his government any extraordinary powers that clearly violate the laws of the US - the US Constitution. Obama has no legal authority to grant any person or persons the right to usurp the law. Such actions taken by former president Bush and current president Obama are clearly deemed to be abuses and usurpations. The US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the United States of America and as such “when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security”.

The United Nations observer post of the U.N Interim Forces in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in south Lebanon that was destroyed by Israeli forces is seen in this photo released July 27, 2006.

It is also reasonable that honest, compassionate people should desire some way to voluntarily pool resources to provide charitable aid to those who are starving or are victims of natural disaster. Indeed, this is the image of the United Nations that has been sold to the world since its inception.

It is not, however, the reality.

The UN gives validity to zealots and bigots. It helps to keep tyrannical dictators in power. It gives a voice to international terrorists.

Delay. Negotiate. Recommend. Study. Reconsider. Do nothing. This is the game the UN has played in nearly every international crisis. It is the reason North Korea remains a threat after 50 years. And it is the reason why a terrorist nation such as Syria can be given a seat on the UN’s Human Rights Council.

The UN is buried under scandals. It has Oil-for-Food scandals. Smuggling scandals. And theft scandals.

UN peacekeeping missions - with their record of rob, rape,and pillage - can actually bring fear to the local citizens they are supposed to protect.

Who has the power to oversee and control its actions? The people don’t vote on UN actions. The media has little access behind the scenes. Who audits the accounting books?

UN supporters admit such problems, and they call for “reform.” But to them, reform doesn’t mean plugging holes in UN spending or clearing up scandals. Instead, it means global governance.

Since its inception, the UN’s advocacy has amounted to a desire to eradicate the sovereignty of nations - while imposing what it calls “world-mindedness.”

A 1949 UNESCO document said, “…nationalism [is] the major obstacle to the development of world-mindedness.”

Therein lies the UN’s true goal. And that belies its public image of being simply a place where nations may come to air their differences and act responsibly.

Instead, the UN works to gain power for itself in order to become independent and supreme over its member nations.

To do that, it needs the power to tax. On Sept. 19, plans were approved by several nations to create a global tax, mostly through airline tickets to help pay for the treatment of AIDS. There are several other tax schemes on the UN wish list. If the UN gains the power to tax, it will become a monster free of its chains. And, of course, the UN wants its own military. It already has its own court.

Imagine a world run by the justice of China, with the economics of Cuba, and the military might of the United States. Such is the world of the future under UN global governance.

A glance at recent history shows that the UN is irrelevant as a body to deliver world peace.

Using images of dire environmental emergencies, life-threatening diseases, or starving children, the UN promotes an agenda that seeks to redistribute the world’s wealth.

Nowhere is there mentioned in a single UN document that I have read an advocacy for the right to own private property. And it is a fact that the inability to own private property creates poverty. It is also a fact that confiscation of private property never helps to eradicate poverty.

It is bad economic policy. Yet that is the UN’s only solution to the massive suffering throughout the world. Take it from one source to give to another. And that, I contend, is the very root of the suffering - not the solution.

The UN is not “dysfunctional” as some “reformists” have claimed. It is a criminal enterprise in which no moral nation should ever participate, let alone perpetuate.

Written by Tom DeWeese - president of the American Policy Center, a nonprofit in Warrenton, Va., dedicated to free enterprise.

There are a lot of unanswered questions concerning the US government’s using federal tax dollars to clear the debts of big banks. They need to be answered. They need to be addressed. They need to be investigated thoroughly. The whole thing clearly looks like an elaborate scheme that clearly involves criminal activity on the part of the bankers, the Bush and Obama White Houses and the US Congress. Any law enforcement agent can tell you that the US government is completely corrupt - from the top down. The US government is openly engaging in a money laundering scheme. The US government has been offered and has accepted bribes from the bankers that are the shareholders of the US Federal Reserve.

You need to question the actions of Obama and the US Congress. How much bribe money did it take to transfer $700 Billion taxpayer dollars to Wall Street’s elite? How much money did your Representative get from Big Bankers to look the other way and pass a bill that the American people clearly do not want? They need to be held accountable for their actions. They need to be held accountable for their crimes. What crime did Obama, members of the US Congress and the bankers commit? The charge is US Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 11 > § 201 Bribery of public officials and witnesses - “A secret payment to a public officer in exchange for preferential treatment.”

At common law, bribery was a criminal offence, as described in Russell on Crimes: “… the receiving or offering any undue reward by or to any person whatsoever, in a public office in order to influence his behavior in office and induce him to act contrary to the known rules of honesty and integrity.”

With almost $83 million being spent to bribe congress by the same companies who received $180 billion, or 25.7% of the $700 billion in federal bailout funds,it is time to consider impeaching all those who took bribes in return for federal bailout funds.

The evidence reveals that banks and insurance companies who are looking to receive taxpayer money are spending money on bribing Congress. Banks and insurance companies started bribing members of Congress in the form of campaign contributions.

A recent issue of BusinessWeek Magazine indicated the following correlation between bailout funds received and lobbying (bribery) dollars spent.

AIG - received $40 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $21,339,000

Citigroup - received $45 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $16,140,000

JP Morgan Chase - received $25 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $10,925,000

GMAC - received $5 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $6,080,000

Bank of America (Includes Merrill Lynch) - received $45 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $16,430,000

Goldman Sachs - received $10 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $6,000,000

Morgan Stanley - received $10 Billion after offering US Congress bribes in the amount of $5,880,000

Total of $180 Billion in Federal Bailout Funding handed out for providing US Congressmen and Congresswomen with bribes amounting to $82,794,000

Information is from the February 23, 2009 issue of BusinessWeek, Pg 036

In short those companies are bribing our government officials. Those companies have paid lobbyists (bribers) offering members of Congress gifts in exchange for preferential treatment, in this case, federal bailout funds - a federal offense, an impeachable offense.

Patriot Act - The War on Civil Liberties

The events of September 11, 2001 should have strengthened the resolve of the US government to work harder to safeguard the rights and freedoms of the US people. After all it is the stated policy of the US government to “not negotiate with terrorists”. After all George W Bush accused bin Laden and terrorists of trying to take away your freedom. Bush stated “On September the 11th, enemies of freedom committed an act of war against our country. … They hate our freedoms — our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.” . bin Laden didn’t draw up the Patriot Act - the Bush administration did.

“Just six weeks after the September 11 attacks, a panicked Congress passed the “USA PATRIOT Act,” an overnight revision of the nation’s surveillance laws that vastly expanded the government’s authority to spy on its own citizens and reduced checks and balances on those powers, such as judicial oversight. The government never demonstrated that restraints on surveillance had contributed to the attack, and indeed much of the new legislation had nothing to do with fighting terrorism. Rather, the bill represented a successful use of the terrorist attacks by the FBI to roll back unwanted checks on its power. . . . Under these changes and other authorities asserted by the Bush Administration, U.S. intelligence agents could conduct a secret search of an American citizen’s home, use evidence found there to declare him an “enemy combatant,” and imprison him without trial. The courts would have no chance to review these decisions — indeed, they might never even find out about them.”
–Jay Stanley and Barry Steinhardt,

USA PATRIOT ACT of 2001 - aka “Public Law No: 107-56,” aka “Ashcroft’s police-state bill,” illegally passed into law on 26 October 2001.

* Section 106 - Unlawful PRESIDENTIAL AUTHORITY (seizure of assets without due process)
* Section 201 - Unlawful AUTHORITY TO INTERCEPT WIRE, ORAL, AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO TERRORISM
* Section 202 - Unlawful AUTHORITY TO INTERCEPT WIRE, ORAL, AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO COMPUTER FRAUD AND ABUSE OFFENSES
* Section 203 - Unlawful AUTHORITY TO SHARE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE INFORMATION
* Section 206 - Unlawful ROVING SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY UNDER THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978
* Section 207 - Unlawful DURATION OF FISA SURVEILLANCE OF NON-UNITED STATES PERSONS WHO ARE AGENTS OF A FOREIGN POWER
* Section 213 - Unlawful AUTHORITY FOR DELAYING NOTICE OF THE EXECUTION OF A WARRANT
* Section 215 - Unlawful ACCESS TO RECORDS AND OTHER ITEMS UNDER THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT
* Section 216 - Unlawful MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO USE OF PEN REGISTERS AND TRAP AND TRACE DEVICES
* Section 218 - FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION
* Section 316 - Unlawful ANTI-TERRORIST FORFEITURE PROTECTION
* Section 351 - Unlawful AMENDMENTS RELATING TO REPORTING OF SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES
* Section 358 - Unlawful BANK SECRECY PROVISIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES TO FIGHT INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM
* Section 411 - Unlawful DEFINITIONS RELATING TO TERRORISM
* Section 501 - Unlawful ATTORNEY GENERAL’S AUTHORITY TO PAY REWARDS TO COMBAT TERRORISM
* Section 802 - Unlawful DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM
* Section 808 - DEFINITION OF FEDERAL CRIME OF TERRORISM
* Section 901 - Unlawful RESPONSIBILITIES OF DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE REGARDING FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE COLLECTED UNDER FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978
* Section 904 - Unlawful TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO DEFER SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS OF REPORTS ON INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENCE-RELATED MATTERS
* Section 1008 - Unlawful FEASIBILITY STUDY ON USE OF BIOMETRIC IDENTIFIER SCANNING SYSTEM WITH ACCESS TO THE FBI INTEGRATED AUTOMATED FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM AT OVERSEAS CONSULAR POSTS AND POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE UNITED STATES

The Patriot Act took away the rights and freedom of the US people. It infringed and denies the people of the United States of American their inalienable rights and freedom. See for yourself. The Bill of Rights has been attacked by the Bush administration. The Patriot Act clearly violates the US supreme law, the US Constitution. The Patriot Act clearly is in violation of the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Seventh Amendment, Eighth Amendment, Ninth Amendment and Tenth Amendment. The Bush Administration’s Patriot Act is clearly in violation of US Law. It is an attack on the rights and freedoms of the US people.

The Bill of Rights

The Preamble to the Bill of Rights:

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.[44]

Amendments

* First Amendment – Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause; freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly; right to petition

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

* Second Amendment – Right to keep and bear arms.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

* Third Amendment – Protection from quartering of troops.

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

* Fourth Amendment – Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

* Fifth Amendment – due process, double jeopardy, self-incrimination, eminent domain.

No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

* Sixth Amendment – Trial by jury and rights of the accused; Confrontation Clause, speedy trial, public trial, right to counsel

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

* Seventh Amendment – Civil trial by jury.

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

* Eighth Amendment – Prohibition of excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment.

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

* Ninth Amendment – Protection of rights not specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

* Tenth Amendment – Powers of states and people.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

US Acts of Terror against the US and foreign countries financed with US grown, protected, harvested, smuggled and trafficked Opium

A hoax is an attempt to trick an audience into believing that something false is real. Governments often perpetrate hoaxes to assist them with unpopular aims such as going to war. There is often a mixture of outright hoax, and suppression and management of information to give the desired impression. In wartime, rumours abound; some may be deliberate hoaxes.

The war on terror was based entirely on the criminals acts (not an act of war as no foreign government and their military attacked the US) of September 11, 2001. The Bush White House used the names bin Laden and Al Qaeda to trick the American people into supporting a unjustified, unwarranted, unnecessary and illegal war in retaliation against the people who killed thousands of people on US soil. The hoax is that the US own government staged the attacks using a revised 1960s false flag plan of attack called Operations Northwoods. http://www.public-ac … com/911/northwds.pdf The evidence that the war on terror is a hoax is the fact that the alleged attacker - bin Laden, is not and has never been sought or found because he was and is key to their elaborate hoax - their phantom terrorist. The US government knew that bin Laden didn’t order the attacks on the US. They needed to declare that he did (a false accusation) to implement the hoax.

The CIA’s own records show that they had financed and trained bin Laden and the Afghan resistance to force the Soviet Union out of Afghanistan. Without the US money and arms the Soviets would not have been forced out of Afghanistan. The very same people the US and NATO forces are now hunting (the Taliban) are the very same people who helped the US fight their proxy war against Russia.

Why would the US want to attack and occupy Afghanistan? The Iran Contra Scandal exposed how the US financed their terrorists operations and proxy wars. They used drug money. Wars are very expensive and once the people start protesting a war then the money from the people stops flowing. How do you continue a war when the people you serve refuses to pay for continuing the war? You take control of the drug trade. Afghanistan under the Taliban wiped out the Opium grow ops. Both the US drug enforcement agency and the United Nations confirmed that the Taliban government had eradicated the Opium. This eradication wiped out the US government’s underground (and illegal) money train. The CIA could no longer finance foreign nationals to overthrow their government to allow pro US leaders to “take” office. How do you get it all back? Exactly what the Bush administrating did - stage an attack against his own country and blame someone else for the treasonous attack. That was exactly what Hitler did when he burned down the Reichstag building and blamed it on communist “terrorists”. In contrast, immediately after 9/11 the Bush White House blamed the al Qaeda “terrorists” and prepared for war with Afghanistan. Wait a minute Afghanistan didn’t attack the US, why attack them? Why did Hitler attack Poland? To take over their steel plants that was needed to build his war machines. The US attacked Afghanistan to revive the Opium trade - needed to finance and build their war machines.

The Opium is now back - setting record harvests thanks to the US, Canadian and NATO troops for providing security to protect the grow ops. The only reason why the Opium is back is because of the US’s war on terror hoax. As long as they continue to declare that bin Laden is making threats against the US and US allies and as long as the US continues to declare that their mission is to find bin Laden the war on terror hoax will continue. Without bin Laden there would be no war in Afghanistan, there would be no Opium, there would be no Americans, Canadians or NATO soldiers dying in operations that protect the proceeds of the Opium drug trade. If the US had captured or killed bin Laden (bin Laden died from wounds suffered in Tora Bora air raid) in December 2001 the war and occupation would have been long over. They need him to be at large and alive and well in order to continue the hoax - war on terror. Both the US and the UK refuses to eradicate the opium fields in Afghanistan, not because it is the only profitable crop for the Afghan people, but because it is their financial enterprise that keeps the war on terror hoax going. Still not convinced?

There is yet another reason for Canada, the US and NATO to end and withdraw from an unlawful war (a war of aggression) in Afghanistan - an unwarranted attack against an innocent nation. The FBI has stated that bin Laden is not wanted for the attacks of September 11, 2001. He is wanted for;

MURDER OF U.S. NATIONALS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES; CONSPIRACY TO MURDER U.S. NATIONALS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES; ATTACK ON A FEDERAL FACILITY RESULTING IN DEATH

http://www.fbi.gov/w … /fugitives/laden.htm

USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.

The FBI Most Wanted Fugitive posting makes no mention of September 11, 2001 because according to Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI;

“The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

NATO got involved when the Bush administration made their case for war by declaring Osama bin Laden as the man who planned for, trained for and executed the attacks of 9/11. The Bush administration also supported their case for war based on a video tape where bin Laden supposedly takes credit for the attacks. The Bush White House attacked Afghanistan not for attacking the US on September 11, 2001 (because none of the hijackers were Afghanistan nationals) but because the Afghanistan’s Taliban government refused to allow US military operations in Afghanistan to capture bin Laden. Because an innocent country was exercising it diplomatic and sovereign right to refuse a foreign country entry into its country Canada, the US and other NATO nations attacked. How is this a war against terror? This is clearly a war of terror against the Afghanistan people. The fact that the FBI could not tie bin Laden to 9/11 was reason enough not to invade and occupy Afghanistan. The US is not even pursuing bin Laden. The New York Times reported on July 4, 2006 “C.I.A. Closes Unit Focused on Capture of bin Laden”

The decision is a milestone for the agency, which formed the unit before Osama bin Laden became a household name and bolstered its ranks after the Sept. 11 attacks, when President Bush pledged to bring Mr. bin Laden to justice “dead or alive.”

http://www.nytimes.c … 8bb9d22&ei=5088

All military operations are against the people of Afghanistan - a war crime as declared by US, Canadian and International Law. All operations are against the Taliban who they overthrew just because they acted to protect the sovereignty of their nation and denied entry by a foreign state (and eradicated the Opium financial enterprise). If the US is no longer pursuing their objective why are Canadians and other NATO nations still engaging in “military” operations against civilians and their cities and towns? The fact that bin Laden was not responsible for the attacks of 9/11 makes it even clear that the US government actually staged an attack (a hoax) as a means for a political and or financial objective.

It is time to support our troops and bring them home so that they can be with their families. It is time to stop killing the innocent people of Afghanistan. It is time to cease all military operations against people who had nothing to do with the attacks on September 11, 2001. It is time to stop waging war against an enemy that doesn’t exist. It is time to face facts and return to reality. It is time to end the war on terror hoax by refusing to fight, laying down our weapons and extending a hand for peace. It is time to “order” the US to cease all hostilities against Afghanistan and Iraq and to remove it troops from those countries. No country is above the law not even the US. The US must abide by the rule of law - both US and International Law clearly define the US actions as unlawful - a war crime, a war of aggression and crimes against humanity. It is the duty of all Americans and all counties around the World to seek, apprehend and put on trial all those who have engaged in these unlawful acts. It is the duty of the International Criminal Court to issue a warrant for the arrest of those in the US White House who gave the order to attack innocent countries, kill innocent civilians and torture POWs and detainees.

It is the duty of every citizen of every country in the World to report the illegal activities of criminals. It is unbelievable to see that these crimes have not been investigated and the criminals involved have not been brought to justice. It is the sworn oath of all police officers and law enforcement agents to uphold the law. No one, not even the president and vice-president of the United States of America is above the law. You want to end the wars? You want to stop terror? It can be achieved immediately if you arrest those who gave the order to begin these unlawful wars. It can be achieved if you treat terror attacks as crimes and investigate them. Terror is not an act of war it is a crime.

On September 27, 2001 the FBI issued a Press Release naming the alleged hijackers of September 11, 2001. Nowhere does it name any Afghanistan (including the Taliban) or Iraqi national. 9/11 was not an act of war. It was a criminal act. It was an attack that launched the US agenda in the Middle East. Evidence already in possession by the US own FBI implicates Saudi Arabia for the attacks, as the majority of hijackers and the alleged mastermind were all Saudi nationals. Because of this evidence the US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are illegal, as they are both wars of aggression. Anyone who has participated in and continues to participate in these unlawful wars are war criminals.

FBI Press Release

AMERICAN AIRLINES #77
BOEING 757

1) Khalid Almihdhar - Saudi national

2) Majed Moqed - Saudi national

3) Nawaf Alhazmi - Saudi national

4) Salem Alhazmi - Saudi national

5) Hani Hanjour - resident of Phoenix, Arizona, and San Diego, California

AMERICAN AIRLINES #11
BOEING 767

1) Satam M.A. Al Suqami- Saudi national

2) Waleed M. Alshehri - Saudi national - a pilot

3) Wail M. Alshehri - residence(s): Hollywood, Florida; Newton, Massachusetts -Believed to be a pilot

4) Mohamed Atta - Egyptian national - a pilot

5) Abdulaziz Alomari - Saudi national - a pilot

UNITED AIRLINES #175
BOEING 767

1) Marwan Al-Shehhi -Possible residence(s): Hollywood, Florida - a pilot

2) Fayez Rashid Ahmed Hassan Al Qadi Banihammad - residence(s): Delray Beach, Florida

3) Ahmed Alghamdi

4) Hamza Alghamdi - residence(s): Delray Beach, Florida

5) Mohand Alshehri - residence(s): Delray Beach, Florida

UNITED AIRLINES #93
BOEING 757

1) Saeed Alghamdi - residence: Delray Beach, Florida

2) Ahmed Ibrahim A. Al Haznawi - Saudi national

3) Ahmed Alnami - residence: Delray Beach, Florida

4) Ziad Samir Jarrah - a pilot

Alleged Mastermind of the 9/11 attacks

USAMA BIN LADEN - Saudi Arabian

The FBI released 19 photographs of individuals believed to be the hijackers (none were foreign soldiers, airmen or navy crewmen) of the four airliners that crashed on September 11, 01

“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. … “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’

Today Roman Catholics celebrate Easter. It is the Holiest of all days for Roman Catholics. It is the day that has become associated with Jesus’ crucifixion - the day of Christ’s Resurrection. It is the day that distinguishes Christians from Romans. If you are a Roman it is the day you celebrate the resurrection of Christ. If you are a true Christian it is not the day of Christ’s resurrections. You see Christians around the World have been deceived. If you do as the Romans tell you, you are a Roman. If you are a Roman Catholic you are a Roman, not a true Christian. If you recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ you are not a Christian you are an anti-Christian.

The true origins of Easter is not Christian

Easter is not the day of Christ’s Resurrection. Easter actually goes back to pre-Christian times. “Eastre” was the name of an ancient Anglo-Saxon pagan goddess and of a festival honouring her. She was the patroness of spring, offspring, and fertility. Remember, in ancient times people lived much closer to nature, life and death, and the cycles of the seasons. Fertility was important as it often meant the difference between surviving or starving.

The bunny as an Easter symbol can be traced to the fact that the original fertility goddess, Eastre, had as her symbol, the hare. As ancient peoples observed animals, the hare was recognised as one of the most fertile of all creatures in the environment of the early Anglo-Saxons.

The ancient Egyptians marked the rebirth of the God Osiris with eight days of celebrations. It is from these celebrations that we get the eight days of Easter, known as Holy Week, which begins on Palm Sunday and finishes on Easter Sunday.

In ancient Rome, an annual festival was held for the rebirth of the God Attis, whose return was celebrated with banqueting, processions and sporting events. This festival was held just after the spring equinox, and it is from here that we derive the date of Easter, which always falls on the first Sunday after the first full moon following the spring equinox. This means Easter can fall any time between March 21 and April 25;

Are you a Christian or an Roman anti-Christian

If you are a Christian you worship God according to the Bible. You are a Roman if you do not worship God according to the Bible. You are Christian if you only worship God. You are Roman Catholic if you do not worship God but instead worship deities - idols. The First Commandment states: “I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself a graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them or serve them.”

The first commandment forbids honoring any gods other than the one true God. Scripture constantly recalls this rejection of idols, being made of gold, silver, wood, and stone. They are described as being only the work of men’s hands, unable to speak, see, hear, smell, eat, grasp, or feel, and powerless either to injure or to benefit. “They have mouths, but do not speak; eyes, but do not see.” These empty idols make their worshippers empty: “Those who make them are like them; so are all who trust in them. In a number of places the Hebrew Bible makes clear that God has no shape or form, and is utterly incomparable; thus no idol, image, idea, or anything comparable to creation could ever capture God’s essence. The Bible records a struggle between the prophet’s attempt to spread pure monotheism, and the tendency of some people, especially rulers, to accept or to encourage others into polytheistic or idolatrous beliefs. Idolatry is usually defined as worship of any cult image, idea, or object, as opposed to the worship of a monotheistic God.

The God forbidden idolatry in the Hebrew Bible is defined as either:

* the worship of idols (or images)
* the worship of polytheistic gods by use of idols (or images)
* the worship of animals or people
* the use of idols in the worship of God.

The Roman Catholic Church is full of these God forbidden idols. Idols include; the Crucifix, any man made cross, the man made Eucharist, all man made statues or images of Jesus, and all man made statues or images of Mary. All of these are forbidden by God. The Romans, however demand that Roman Catholics bow down to these man made idols - a direct defiance of God. You are a Roman Catholic if you bow to them or serve them.

The Roman Catholic faith is a sham, a false religion fashioned around showy but powerless rituals and spectacular but worthless ceremonies rooted in pre-Christian religions. Having read the Bible you too can see clearly that the pre-Christian religious practices described in the Old Testament, which God commanded the Hebrews to avoid, are mostly the current religious practices of the Roman Catholic Church.

The Holy Bibles contain a prohibition in the Second Commandment against religiously associated idols of any kind, and against images of any living thing when the idols and images are for religious purposes. It is that since no human has ever seen God, no human can ever produce a replica or likeness of God that would be remotely accurate. Which would render every religiously associated idol and image the worthless status of being either a pathetic counterfeit of the Real God or of being an unholy substitute for the True God. And that this worthless and forbidden status applies to all religiously associated idols and images without exception.

Not one officially approved Roman Catholic Bible contains the Second Commandment prohibition against idols and images used in religious worship or involved in pious devotional practices. Roman Catholicism has altered some scriptures to suit its religious practices rather than adjusting its religious practices to fit God’s Holy Scripture.

The Romans defy God and made Sunday their Sabbath

You are a Christian if you recognize the Sabbath Day as Saturday. According to the Bible, The Sabbath is Saturday, not Sunday, and has never been changed.

“Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor, and do all your work; but the seventh day is a Sabbath to The Lord your God; in it you shall not do any work, you, or your son, or your daughter, your manservant, or your maidservant, or your cattle, or the sojourner who is within your gates; for in six days The Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day; therefore The Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.”

Until the late 4th century CE, when anti-Christianity was made the official religion of Rome, Christians lived in a predominately Pagan world. There was a mosaic of Pagan religions in the Roman Empire:

* The long established, official religion of the Roman Empire was Pagan. It involved worship of — or at least nominal sacrifices to — a pantheon of Roman deities, both Gods and Goddesses.
* A strong competitor to true Christianity in those days was a third religion: Mithraism. This faith involved the worship of a Persian God Mithra, and was popular among the Roman civil service and military.
* There were many other smaller religions, including the Pagan religions of Greece and Egypt, and the mystery religions.

Book of Genesis proves that the Sabbath is Saturday

“In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.”

There is no mistake. According to the Bible, Christian are told that God created the heaven, the Earth and the Sun all on the first day of the week. Remember that in six days The Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. The Sun was created with God saying “Let there be light: and there was light.” Furthermore God created the Sun on the very first day of the six days of creation. That is why Sunday is considered the first day of the week and as such Saturday would, and has always been the 7th day or Sabbath Day of the week.

It wasn’t until 321 CE, while he was a Pagan sun-worshiper, the Roman Emperor Constantine declared that Sunday was to be a day of rest throughout the Roman Empire:

“On the venerable day of the Sun let the magistrates and people residing in cities rest, and let all workshops be closed. In the country however persons engaged in agriculture may freely and lawfully continue their pursuits because it often happens that another day is not suitable for gain-sowing or vine planting; lest by neglecting the proper moment for such operations the bounty of heaven should be lost.”

The Church Council of Laodicea circa 364 CE ordered that religious observances were to be conducted on Sunday, not Saturday. That is why Sunday officially became the Roman’s Sabbath. A mortal, in defiance of God, breaking God’s commandments, declared Sunday to be the Sabbath.

Romans decreed that Sunday in worship of the sun was to be observed as the “official Sabbath by all the people of the land. Anyone caught keeping the 7th day of the week was considered in rebellion and thousands of Christians were crucified and murdered for their continuance of observing the 7th day Sabbath in disobedience to the new Roman empire decree. Thus the day of worship was changed from Saturday to Sunday not by God or Christ but by Constintine and the Roman Catholic Church.

Emperor Constantine was the first Roman Pope

Many Christians believe that the first Pope was the Apostle Peter. That is False. The first Pope of the Roman Catholic Church was Roman Emperor Constantine. Christians do not need a Pope or any figurehead for their faith because God is the one true God. If Christians were to have someone, a mortal, be elected or be appointed or be the self-proclaimed head of their faith then they would again defy God. “You shall have no other gods before me. … you shall not bow down to them or serve them.” Having a Pope or any leader of your faith would require to you to serve them which God forbids us.

Emperor Constantine was born Flavius Valerius Constantinus at Nis on Feb. 27, 280, in what is now Serbia, son of the commander Constantius Chlorus (later Constantius I) and Helena, a prostitute and Balkan barmaid.

As a youth Constantine was sent to the palace of the infamous Roman Emperor Diocletian to learn the tricks of the trade as they say. At that time, Christianity was growing by leaps and bounds throughout the Empire. The Christians were outstanding citizens but the Emperors saw them as a threat to the Empire for ONE reason: they refused to acknowledge the divinity of the Emperors or call Caesar “lord.”

During the early days of Rome, the people hated kings. Rome was a republic. This human divinity idea came from the Pharaohs. Egyptian rulers were considered gods by their subjects, and when Julius Caesar conquered Egypt, he brought this idea back to Rome.

Beginning in the year 303, the pagan Roman Empire made one last great attempt to exterminate Christianity. Emperor Diocletian began the last great pagan persecution in which most of the history of early Christianity was destroyed.
The Roman persecution against Christianity lasted 10 years. It is called the last great pagan persecution of the Congregation.

Fire, racks, swords, wild beasts, crosses, poison and famine were made use of to kill the Christians. Torture was used against those who would not deny Christ and acknowledge Caesar as “lord” and burn incense to his image. The lives of Christians during that time consisted of persecution above ground and prayer underground. This is known in history as the era of the martyrs. The main target of the Romans was the New Testament . . . and the histories of Christ….All of the great books portraying the Mount of Olives as the site of the Resurrection were systematically destroyed. Even the books written by Roman pagan authors were destroyed because they would reveal a lot about the doctrines and practices of the Apostolic Congregations. There were millions of Christians and many of them had copies of the New Testament. Only about 5,000 manuscripts have survived from that time and the oldest is dated around 350 A.D. Rome was systematically destroying Christian history so that the next generation of believers would have no idea what their parents believed. With the total destruction of Christian history, it was easy to associate the Papacy with St. Peter.

The great pagan persecution against Christianity ended when Constantine defeated Maxentius, his rival in Italy, at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge, near Rome. In 312, on the eve of the crucial battle against Maxentius, Constantine is reported to have dreamed that Christ appeared to him and told him to inscribe the first two letters of his name (XP in Greek) on the shields of his troops. The next day he is said to have seen a cross superimposed on the sun and the words “in this sign you will be the victor”. With Constantine’s defeat of Maxentius the Senate hailed Constantine as savior of the Roman people. Constantine, who had been a pagan solar worshiper, attributed his victory to his vision. Persecution of the Christians ended, and Constantine’s co-emperor, Licinius, joined him in issuing the Edict of Milan (313), which mandated toleration of Christians in the Roman Empire. As guardian of Constantine’s favored religion, the church was then given legal rights and large financial donations. This ended the first stage of the Roman war on the saints and commenced the second.

Pope Constantine changed the PLACE of the Resurrection of Christ!

Constantine knew from experience that the great power of the Christian message came from the preaching of the Resurrection of Christ. Immediately upon assuming the purple (title of Pope), he set about to insidiously undermine and then eliminate this cardinal doctrine.

For 300 years the Christians were accustomed to visit the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem and they came back filled with zeal for their Risen Lord. They also saw the total ruins of the Temple in exact fulfillment of the words of Jesus. This made them invincible to all the threats and arguments of the pagans. Constantine set about to change this.

The Resurrection of Christ is the great central Doctrine of Christianity. It is the ROCK and pillar that support the entire structure. “And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain (I Cor. 15:14).”

In the year 326, Constantine sent his mother Helena to Jerusalem to discover the spot that he had chosen as the place of Jesus’ Resurrection. This was the site of the temple of Venus (the largest known temple in Ancient Rome. Located at the far east side of the Forum Romanum near the Colosseum, it was dedicated to the goddesses Venus Felix (Venus the Bringer of Good Fortune) and Roma Aeterna (Eternal Rome) on the West side of Jerusalem. Constantine ordered the temple torn down and a church constructed on the site. This is called the church of the Holy Sepulchre to this day. This is the not the spot of the Resurrection of Christ. It is the WRONG spot because it was located within the city of Jerusalem and Jesus died outside the city walls.

Roman Pope Constantine changed the TIME of the Resurrection of the Lord!

In 325, self-proclaimed Pope Constantine presided over the Council of Nicaea which changed the time of the Lord’s Resurrection to the Sunday following the Passover. This was to coincide with the old Roman festival of Easter which usually fell about a week after Passover when the moon rose after midnight.

Pope Constantine changed the TIME of our Christ’s birth to Dec. 25.

Another great destination for the Christians was the town of Bethlehem where Jesus was born. Since Rome destroyed all of the books on the correct time of Jesus’ birth, Constantine was able to declare the birthday of Jesus Christ to be December 25. Dec. 25 was the most important day for the pagans. It was the Winter Solstice and was named Dies Natalis Invicti or The Birthday of the Unconquered SUN. There are no solar holidays in the Bible. All the holidays are lunar or based on the MOON. In the ancient world, pilgrims would never travel to Bethlehem during the Winter. Furthermore the Roman Catholic pagan church decreed that Christ’s birth should be celebrated on the same day as that of their sun god instead of the known time of year in the fall around or near the Feast of Tabernacles celebrated by the Israelites. The Feast of Tabernacles begins in the Fall of the year and is a full week of rejoicing, celebration, singing, dancing and feasting depicting the time to come when God will come to dwell with man and set up his wonderful Kingdom. Many Factors point to Christ being born in the Fall of the year and not the Winter Solstice. One of the most important facts that makes December 25 the wrong date for Christ’s birth is that the Romans collected taxes in the fall of the year after the harvest. This is also evident in the fact that shepherds were in the fields watching the sheep at the time of Christ’s birth.

Roman Emperor Constantine unites Church and State - creates the Vatican.

After changing the TIME and PLACE of the birth and Resurrection, the third strike of Satan against the Gospel was the marrying of this false Christianity with the State. He made Christianity the State religion - united church and state.

The Anti-Christian Roman Catholics

In the 30 years that Constantine reigned, the Roman Catholic system was fully developed. The 2 big festivals: Christmas and Easter with entry through baptism instead of the new birth, union of church and state, and the false time and place of the Lord’s birth and Resurrection have continued right down to our time. Pope Constantine is the last in our unholy trinity. He united this pagan Sol Invictus cult with Christianity or what was left of Christianity after the last great pagan persecution. Constantine was the personification of Deus Sol Invictus on earth, and could consider the statue of the sun in the Forum bearing his name as a statue of himself”. To this day the Pope considers himself to be the Vicar of Christ on earth. A title of the pope implying his supreme and universal primacy, both of honour and of jurisdiction, over the Church of Christ. Today the Vatican officially teaches that the Pope is the substitute (anti) for Christ Jesus or anti-Christ. The words of the official pronouncement are:

“The Pope, Bishop of Rome and Peter’s successor, ‘is the perpetual and visible source and foundation of the unity both of the bishops and of the whole company of the faithful.’

‘For the Roman Pontiff, by reason of his office as Vicar of Christ, and as pastor of the entire Church has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, a power which he can always exercise.”

Persuading men and women that Christ the Lord left a mortal man to be His vicar on earth attempts to deny the very purpose of Christ Jesus.

In the Old Testament, Satan’s religion was called BAAL worship or sun worship. Baal was just another name for Satan himself or his top deputy. He was the main opponent of Moses when he led the chosen people out of Egyptian bondage.

BAAL fought against Joshua when he tried to bring the chosen people into the promised land. Baal fought against Samson, Gideon, Deborah, David, Jehoshaphat, Elijah, Ezra, Nehemiah, and ALL the Old Testament saints.

BAAL was totally defeated by the Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ on the Mount of Olives in 33 A.D., but he refused to admit defeat and moved to Rome to carry on the battle against God’s New Testament chosen people — the TRUE Christians.

What better facade than a “church” to cover the Antichrist real identity? The Bible tells us that Satan, the devil, “deceives the whole world.” (Revelation 12:9). Everyone in the world has been deceived by the devil and by his agent, the Antichrist.

During the Dark Ages the Catholic Church slaughtered over 150 million Christians, and this atrocity is never mentioned today! The world has almost completely forgotten the many millions of people who were burned at the stake by the papacy because they wanted to worship God according to the Bible.

The Church of Rome has shed more innocent blood than any other institution that has ever existed among mankind. The papacy still claims that it has a right to slaughter so-called “heretics,” as it did in the Dark Ages. “The Church of Rome says that she has a right to punish with the confiscation of their goods, or the penalty of death, those who differ in faith from the Pope.”

ABRAHAM LINCOLN concerning civil war - “This war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits. We owe it to Popery that we now see our land reddened with the blood of her noblest sons. Though there were great differences of opinion between the South and North, on the question of slavery, neither Jeff Davis nor any one of the leading men of the Confederacy would have dared to attack the North, had they not relied on the promise of the Jesuits, that, under the mask of Democracy, the money and the arms of the Roman Catholics, even the arms of France, were at their disposal if they would attack us.”

Make no mistake, history accurately records that what today is called Roman Catholicism, as the state religion of Rome, was the avowed enemy of Christianity and of individual Christians for nearly 300 years after the resurrection of Christ Jesus. Both the Bible and recorded history show that, prior to the Fourth Century of this Common Era, Roman Catholicism had no part in the formation of Apostolic Christian doctrine and had no part in the establishment of any Christian church group. For Roman Catholicism did not declare itself “Christian” until the Emperor Constantine, early in the Fourth Century, CE, decreed Christianity as the new, official, state religion of Rome - decreed 300 years after the resurrection of Christ. Immediately following the Emperor’s decree, the Christian-persecuting Romans of the former, ages-old, Roman state religion shortly and quickly absorbed (usurped) Apostolic Christianity.

Romanism proceeded to BACK-DATE their Fourth Century, CE, ascension to their newly-endorsed “Christian-like” status to make it appear as if Roman Catholicism had evolved from the original Apostolic Christian Church in an unbroken line of succession from Saint Peter, through all the Popes-of-Rome, right up to today.

The masses of just-converted pagans and heathens had no way of knowing this new state-ordained religion was composed of fakers, posers and frauds, since, as a result of 300 years of persecution, almost no authentic Christians remained (Alive!) to testify against the old Romanists in their new, state-sponsored, “Christian-like”, religious permutation.

Those former persecutors of Christians, those old Romanists of the formerly official, pagan, state religion, those old idolatrous Roman Catholic priests, abbots and bishops were not and are not true Christian in God’s eyes.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, vowed to unite all of Europe under one single constitution. Of course, this in effect would wipe out the National Sovereignty of every country in the European Union.

Back in 1942, a book called “The European Community” was published. Its principal author, a Doctor of Economics, had argued in 1940 for a “Central European Union” and “European Economic Area” and for fixed exchange rates - EMU in all but name. In this book, he wrote that “No nation in Europe can achieve on its own the highest level of economic freedom which is compatible with all social requirements…The formation of very large economic areas follows a natural law of development….interstate agreements in Europe will control [economic forces generally]…There must be a readiness to subordinate one’s own interests in certain cases to those of [the EC].”

One of his co-authors wrote that the “classic national economy..is dead…community of fate which is the European economy…fate and extent of European co-operation depends on a new unity economic plan”. Another observed that “We have a real European Community task before us…I am convinced that this Community effort will last beyond the end of the war.”

The last three words explain things. The principal author was Nazi Economics Minister and war criminal Walther Funk. The other two were respectively Nazi academic Heinrich Hunke and official Gustav Koenig. Nor were they just eccentrics. Goering’s orders in 1940 were followed by a project for the “large-scale economic unification of Europe” Goebbels, in the same year, compared Germany’s road to unification in the nineteenth century with Europe’s in the twentieth, believing that “in fifty years’ time [people] no longer think in terms of countries.”

“The new Europe of solidarity and co-operation among all its people… will find…rapidly increasing prosperity once national economic boundaries are removed.”

“The European Community was therefore intended by the Nazis…. as a common cause against British…economic systems of trade and free exchange.” Mr. Atkinson goes on (in his book “Europe’s Full Circle”) to kindly provide us (pages 92-93) with a list of parallels between “Hitler’s Europe” and “Today’s Europe.”

* Europaische Wirtshaftsgemeinschaft
European Economic Community

* European Currency System
European Exchange Rate Mechanism

* Europabank (Berlin)
European Central Bank (Frankfurt)

* European Regional Principle
Committee of the Regions

* Common Labour Policy
Social Chapter

* Economic and Trading Agreements
Single Market

A few further quotes may be of interest -”The Germans alone can really organise Europe… The future will belong to the Germans when we build the House of Europe…The Anglo-Saxon economic system, the classic national economy, is dead…It is important to establish a European Single Currency core in order to stand firm against Anglo-Saxon values.”

The negation of national sovereignty is central to imperialism and takes many forms, including the EU and the WTO. It is part of the development of a new and higher form of fascism which like the previous version eliminates the last vestiges of bourgeois democratic processes. We are constantly being reminded that the sovereign state is an anachronism, that we need a modern structure adapted to new needs.

Tthe bourgeois sovereign state, despite its limitations, must be defended because it enables the working class to exercise political power. At this point in time, replacing it by supranational structures can only benefit the capitalists.

In the 1930s, fascist jurists tried to legitimize German imperialism on the grounds that a homogeneous ethnic group – das volk – forms the true nation and is of a higher order than the state. This means that the ethnic nation also supersedes international law, which consists of agreements between states.

Military intervention in other countries is justified if the leader of das volk considers that it is required in order to safeguard members of this group, regardless of national jurisdiction. A similar concept is also a component of Zionist ideology, and Zionist leaders had repeated contact with officials of the Third Reich.

Governments in the Baltic countries are currently applying the principle of the ethnic nation to deny civil rights to the general population.

In other sections of the imperialist camp, violations of national sovereignty have often been publicly justified by the need to safeguard the lives and/or property of fellow citizens. This was a standard pretext for the US government in 54 military interventions in Latin America between 1890 and 1994.

In recent years we have heard an argument that is analogous to the fascist ethnic nation, as imperialist ideologues attempt to enshrine the principle of “human rights” as pre-empting existing international law.

One example is the assault on Yugoslavia 1992-1999. The breach of national sovereignty by NATO was repeatedly justified in the mainstream media by claims that human rights had either been violated, were being violated or were about to be violated by the Serbs, which was the term used in the West to denote the legally elected government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

Parallels were often drawn in a fictional analogy to the Munich conference of 1939, when the West “stood by” and allowed the mass murder of Jews. In the 1990s it was said that the West could no longer allow the Serbs to trample on human rights with impunity – military intervention was both necessary and just.

We may note that imperialist propaganda about Bosnia contrasted Serbs with Muslims. Not only was this a false dichotomy of ethnicity as opposed to religion, but it also ignored the fact that a significant number of Muslims in Bosnia are ethnic Serbs.

EU treaty an assault on democracy

Anthony Coughlan of the National Platform EU Research and Information Centre identifies four important aspects of the revised EU constitutional treaty and explains why democrats everywhere should oppose it

1. It would give the EU the constitutional form of a state for the first time and make us all real and not just honorary citizens of this EU state:

POLITICALLY, the most important thing the new treaty would do would be to set up a legally new EU in the constitutional form of a supranational European federation and to make us all real citizens of that state, owing obedience to its laws and loyalty to its authority, in contrast to our notional or honorary EU “citizenship” at present.

The symbols of an EU state - flag, anthem and national day - are to be dropped, for they already exist anyway without a legal basis; but the actual EU state of which these are the symbols is to be constitutionally created by the proposed new treaty. This is to be done by giving the EU legal personality and its own corporate existence for the first time, separate from and superior to its member states, just as the USA is legally separate from and superior to states like California, Kansas and New York, or federal Germany is superior to Bavaria, Saxony etc.

Politically and legally, this is the core element of an EU constitution. It will incorporate most elements of the existing Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, although the word ‘constitution’ is to be avoided for fear it might alarm people. As this is politically and legally the most important part of the revised constitution, while being the least understood and discussed aspect of it - for the EU state-builders are desperate to avoid drawing attention to it - it is explained more fully below.

2. It would give the EU more law-making powers:

The revised constitutional treaty transfers more powers to the EU from national states, national parliaments and citizens. It gives the constitutionally new Union which it would establish law-making powers over 50 new areas or topics of public policy. These include transport, public health, energy, space, science, sport. The non-elected Commission would get the monopoly of proposing EU laws in these new areas and these laws would be made primarily by the oligarchy, the committee of legislators, which is the 27 politicians who constitute the Council of Ministers as they make laws for 450 million Europeans and are irremoveable as a group.

3. It would give the big states more weight and small and middle-sized states less weight in making EU laws:

It would do this by making population size a key element in deciding EU laws and thereby reduce the relative voting weight and influence of small and middle-sized states as compared to the big states, of which Germany is the biggest.

4. It would remove the right to a permanent EU commissioner:

It would remove the right of each member state to be represented at all times on the EU Commission, the body which has the monopoly of proposing EU laws, by making the number of commissioners fewer than the number of member states. This matters less to Big States, for their political and economic weight ensures that they can defend their interests in EU policy-making even if they are occasionally without Commission representation. This proposed change has far more serious implications for smaller states.

Giving a new EU the constitutional form of state, of which we would be made real and not notional citizens as at present:

Politically and legally the most important thing in the proposed revised EU constitutional treaty is that:

* it would give the constitutional form of a supranational European state to the legally new EU it would establish, making the latter separate from and constitutionally superior to its 27 member states, just as the USA is separate from and constitutionally superior to California, New York, Kansas etc.; and
* it would make us all real citizens of this newly constituted EU, owing obedience to its laws and loyalty to its authority as superior to our own national constitutions and laws, just as the constitution and laws of the USA are superior to the constitution and laws of California, New York etc. Real EU citizenship would thereby replace the notional or honorary EU “citizenship” people speak of at present, for one can only be a citizen of a state.

The Treaty would make this change this by:

* giving the legally new EU, which the Treaty would establish, its own legal personality and distinct corporate existence for the first time, something all states possess;
* abolishing the current distinction between the area of supranational European Community law, where the EC Commission has the monopoly of legislative proposals, and the “intergovernmental” areas of foreign policy, justice and home affairs, where member states up to now have retained their sovereignty. All areas of public policy would thereby come within the scope of supranational EU law-making either actually or potentially, as in any single unified state;
* transferring the powers and institutions of the existing European Community to the new European Union which the revised constitutional treaty would establish;
* making us real citizens of this new EU state entity, with the normal citizens’ duties of obedience and loyalty, with all the implications of that.

By constituting this new European Union for the first time, the new treaty would in effect be the Constitution of a supranational EU federal state even though the intention is to avoid using the word ‘constitution’ so far as possible, for fear that would alarm people if they realised what is happening, especially if they get a chance to vote in referendums. Hence the intention of avoiding giving citizens a say, except in Ireland and possibly Denmark, where referendums on all surrenders of state sovereignty are constitutionally required.

Up to now the European Union does not have legal personality or corporate existence in its own right. Only the European Community, which makes supranational EC laws, possesses that. Properly speaking therefore, there is thus no such thing as ‘EU’(European Union) law - only ‘EC’(European Community) law. At present the name ‘European Union’, which derives from the 1992 Maastricht Treaty on European Union, is a descriptive term for the various forms of cooperation amongst the 27 EU member states. These forms of cooperation cover the area of supranational law constituted by the European Community on the one hand, where the European Commission proposes all the laws, and on the other hand cooperation in the “intergovernmental” areas of foreign and home affairs, where member states have up to now retained their sovereignty and the European Commission has no legislative role.

That is why the 1992 Maastricht Treaty is called the ‘Treaty on European Union rather than ‘of’ Union. The proposed revised constitutional treaty which the Intergovernmental Conference will now draw up would be in effect the ‘Treaty OF European Union’, for that would legally establish the European Union as a distinct entity for the first time, with most of the features of a state, and would make us all real citizens of this new state entity.

Giving the new European Union, which the revised constitutional treaty would establish, legal personality and its own corporate existence would enable it to have not only its own president, foreign minister - however called - and diplomatic corps, and sign inter-state treaties with other states, it would enable the new Union to take to itself all the powers and institutions of the existing European Community - legislative, executive and judicial. This legally new EU would thereby possess all the features of a fully developed state except the power to impose taxes and to take its constituent member states to war against their will; and the Euro-federalists aim to give the new EU federation the latter two powers in time.

Why this curious procedure of having one treaty - Maastricht - ‘on’ European Union and another treaty - the proposed Constitutional Treaty - effectively a Treaty ‘of’ Union? The reason is that because the Maastricht Treaty on European Union makes us all familiar with the terms ‘European Union’ and ‘European citizenship’, without actually legally establishing these or giving them substantial legal content, those pushing the Euro-federalist integration project hope that citizens will not notice the radical character of the constitutional change being proposed in the revised constitution and how the legal essence of both the ‘Union’ itself and EU ‘citizenship’ is to be altered without most people being aware of it. The same familiar names and terms will be kept, but their legal substance would be fundamentally transformed.

By such sleight of hand are we to be made real citizens of a real European state that is superior to our own national states. We are thereby to have real citizens’ obligations of obedience, solidarity and loyalty to the new European Union imposed upon us without most people knowing or realising that this is happening, for those pushing the new treaty are desperately anxious not to draw attention to this aspect of it. And so far as possible the peoples of Europe are not be consulted in referendums, for fear they might thereby realise what is happening and they might object.

It is surely no small thing to attempt to turn the citizens of the member states of the EU into citizens of a supranational ‘United States of Europe’ that is separate from and superior to their own national states and constitutions. It can only be done by sleight of hand, deception and bullying. Hence the elaborate charade of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty on European Union and the new Treaty of European Union, which the proposed revised constitutional treaty in effect would be, although it is intended to give the latter some such spin-doctor’s title as ‘reform treaty’ to make it easier for the EU elites to get it ratified.

The 1950 Schuman Declaration on the European Coal and Steel Community stated that that was “the first step in the federation of Europe”. The proposed revised constitutional treaty would be the capstone of the Euro-federalist edifice in that it would give the constitutional form of a supranational state federation to the legally constituted new EU it would establish, to which we would all be required to give citizens’ obedience and loyalty. This would be a superior obedience and loyalty to that which we currently owe our national states and constitutions, just as the latter would be constitutionally and legally inferior to the former. Yet the peoples of Europe have no desire for such a development, for it would fundamentally subvert the national democracy and independence of their respective nation states and deprive them of the right to make most of the laws they must obey.

That is why this entire scheme is a profound assault on democracy by the European political, bureaucratic and economic elites that are pushing it. It can only generate hostility and bitterness among citizens all over Europe as they discover with time the implications of the constitutional coup d’etat being planned by these Euro-elites. It constitutes the greatest assault on democracy on the continent since the days of fascism and World War II.

That is why democrats in every EU country, whether on the right or left politically, should unite to oppose it and cooperate and exchange information cross-nationally in doing so.

The US invasion and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan has accomplished one thing - it has made us all victims of government policy. It will haunt us all for the rest of our lives because we allowed innocent people to be murdered in cold blood.

The following is one of the most ridiculous ploys ever uttered in political speech: “Our military personnel who died in Iraq have died in vain if we do not stay and win.”

If it is true that this war should never have been launched, then indeed, let us face it, these men and women have died in vain. And if this is so, it is not their fault; it is the fault of all those who have promoted this war, whether in or out of military service. If the U.S. presence in Iraq is making matters worse, then those who are now dying and will die because of our continued presence are indeed dying in vain. If this war is a mistake, then the tens of thousands who have been wounded have made these sacrifices in vain. Again, this is not their fault, but the fault of all those who have promoted and permitted this war. These wounded warriors have a right to our respect and gratitude and to our provision for them of the best healthcare services money can buy. Doing this for them is a valid part of our nation’s commitment to conduct this war. But it can still be true that all this sacrifice has been in vain. And if so, then each veteran, citizen, and politician needs to face up to this truth, no matter how painful this truth may feel.

Going forward, our policy decisions about this war cannot be made on the basis of protecting someone, anyone, from having some bad feelings. Our issue is a moral one and a practical one about what must now be done. Anyone who claims that this nation should stay in this war longer in order to protect persons from realizing that their sacrifices have been in vain shows their idiocy as a moral thinker. Deeper still, they can be charged with overt wrongdoing for manipulating the pained feelings of U.S. citizens with this ridiculous political speech. If this war has been in vain, then it has been in vain. We can even ask if it has been worse than being in vain. Has it been utterly delusory, incredibly incompetent, and even downright wicked? And if so, then the sooner we confess this and accept our forgiveness for this, the sooner we will have enough moral sanity to make good decisions going forward.

Also ridiculous is the political speech that claims that “supporting our troops” means “staying the course.” This is another instance of wrong-headed manipulation and outright disrespect for every veteran and every U.S. citizen.

The use of such political speech for justifying this war is an admission that good reasons for this war are missing, or at least secret. Using the above justifications for this war is clearly a ploy to stir the feelings of U.S. citizens in support of a policy whose true reasons are not being stated. So what are our true reasons for being in Iraq? Here is my carefully considered view. The true reasons for our being in Iraq were designed long before 9/11, long before the first Iraq war. The true reasons have to do with protecting the oil supply of this oil rich sector of the world from falling into “other” hands. It is ironic that some promoters of this war can also say that this nation should wean itself from its oil addiction. That is like an alcoholic saying he should wean himself from his alcohol while making big sacrifices to acquire a whiskey factory. Let us have some straight talk here. Do we want to expend ourselves getting off the oil habit, or do we want to expend ourselves protecting our oil supply? This question at least raises an honest moral issue.

There are other bits of political speech that need debunking. We are told that we are in Iraq to do something for the Iraqi people, “helping to maintain social order long enough for them to stand up so we can stand down.” There is a sector of the Iraqi people who want us to stay, namely those who believe that their current political empowerment would be vulnerable without our support. But there is a larger sector of the Iraqi people who suspect that our motives for being in Iraq are entirely in our own self interest and who feel violated that we presume to make for them key decisions about their destiny. If a fair vote could be taken among Iraqi people about our staying or leaving, we would be asked to leave. The same result has taken place and will take place as such votes are taken in the United States. Promoting democracy at home or abroad has never been the goal of our being in Iraq. We are there to control the oil. If we the people, whose government this is supposed to be, admit this basic oil-related purpose, then much clarity emerges.

So let us face this question directly, “Should we control the Iraqi oil?” We don’t want the Chinese to control it. We don’t want the Europeans to control it. We don’t want Iran to control it. But let us face the big picture: none of these nations want us to control that oil. And the Iraqi people, most of them, do not want us to control it. So if we want to make a positive contribution to the dilemmas of this part of the world, the very first thing we should do is renounce our right and our intent to control this oil. This includes tearing down our permanent bases in Iraq or at least turning them over to Iraqis. Then, there might be some chance of reaching some kind of international agreements on how this oil supply and the wealth derived from it might be best used on behalf of all the people of the planet. Our go-it-alone imperial nationalism does not please anyone in the world, including most U.S. citizens. Cutthroat competition with big military back-up is not the way to work these things out.

One last item of bad political speech needs our attention: “losing this war would be a national shame.” Losing or winning can have a thousand meanings. This is not a game of football where winning is clearly defined and the home team is loyally rooted for. If winning means controlling the oil, then winning is a tyrannical outcome. If winning means establishing by force a form of government for a people who do not want it, then winning is again both inadvisable as well as impossible. If winning means establishing an international consensus on how to conduct affairs in this West Asian, Middle Eastern part of the world, then winning could include a rather prompt withdrawal of U.S. military forces from that part of the world. When our political discussion focuses on this sort of winning, we might discover something for the U.S. government to do that is not in vain.

Gene Marshall - Bonham, Texas

President Obama, with Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner (played a pivotal role in the decision to bail out AIG) said that a culture of “excess greed” demonstrated in A.I.G.’s dealings should have no place in a new Wall Street.

When president Barack Obama was Senator Barack Obama he received a $101,332 bonus from American International Group (AIG) in the form of political contributions. The two biggest Congressional recipients of bonuses from the A.I.G. are - Senators Chris Dodd (currently serves as Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.) and Senator Barack Obama (currently the president of the United States of America).

The A.I.G. Financial Products affiliate of A.I.G. gave out $136,928, the most of any AIG affiliate, in 2008. A.I.G.’s financial products division is the unit that wrote trillions of dollars’ worth of credit-default swaps and apparently “misjudged” the risk.

The Washington Post reported a “mob effect” at A.I.G financial products division:

A tidal wave of public outrage over bonus payments swamped American International Group yesterday. Hired guards stood watch outside the suburban Connecticut offices of AIG Financial Products, the division whose exotic derivatives brought the insurance giant to the brink of collapse last year. Inside, death threats and angry letters flooded e-mail inboxes. Irate callers lit up the phone lines. Senior managers submitted their resignations. Some employees didn’t show up at all.

With the anger and rage that is being exhibited against A.I.G., perhaps the kickbacks Obama received from A.I.G. explain Obama’s A.I.G crocodile tears.

Now that the Wall street Journal has revealed that A.I.G. paid bonuses of $1 million or more to 73 employees, it’s time to ask if recipients of A.I.G. “bonuses,” including President Obama, will give what now ought to be taxpayer money back?

President Obama recently selected members of a new task force on tax reform. One of the people he appointed is Martin Feldstein, a man who has been an AIG board member for 21 years! Among other things, the new task force will propose ways to overhaul the tax code and make changes in corporate tax breaks. Feldstein is also a member of the president’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board. Did the fact that Obama received more money from AIG in the 2008 election cycle than any other sitting senator, have anything to do with Obama “rewarding” AIG with such politically and financially prestigious positions in the Obama government?

It should come as no surprise that when the White House was asked to comment about Mr. Feldstein’s AIG connection, a senior administration official declined to comment.

Americans for Limited Government President Bill Wilson urged President Barack Obama and members of Congress to “return the $4.37 million they received in campaign contributions from AIG since 1989, including the $644,218 they received in 2008.”

“If the American people are to believe all the angry words and threats coming from the White House, President Obama must return the $104,332 he received from AIG during the 2008 campaign cycle,” declared Wilson in a statement.

AIG reportedly gave some $644,218 to candidates for federal office in 2008. According to Wilson’s letter, “[I]n return, it received from the Federal Reserve some $173 billion in taxpayer-guaranteed loans. That represents nearly a 27 million percent return on their 2008 ‘investment’ into politicians’ loyalty.”

“The 2008 money received by the President and members of Congress should clearly be returned, but more than that, the honorable thing would be for any politician who has ever received a penny from AIG to return it to the American taxpayers who are now paying to keep the company afloat,” Wilson said.

“These campaign kickbacks must be returned,” Wilson added.

Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) in 2008 received $103,900 from AIG. According to the letter, “in the 2009 ‘stimulus’ legislation, [Dodd] inserted the amendment that guaranteed that bonuses would be paid by adding language to a spending cap that specifically excluded executive bonuses included in contracts.”

“Only 11 of the 314 members of the Democratic Congressional majority voted against the ‘stimulus’ and protecting the AIG bonuses, and now they act shocked as they pretend to have never read the 1100-page bill that they are responsible for that cost $787 billion,” Wilson said.

Wilson believes that campaign contributions from AIG and other bailout firms represent “a clear case of pay-to-play corruption.”

Follow the Bailout Cash

There was plenty of outrage on Capitol Hill over the executive bonuses paid out by AIG after getting federal bailout money. But another money trail could make voters just as angry: the campaign dollars to members of Congress from banks and firms that have received billions via the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

A NEWSWEEK review of recent filings with the Federal Election Commission found that the political action committees of five big TARP recipients doled out $85,300 to members in the first two months of this year—with most of the cash going to those who serves on committees who oversee the TARP program. Among them:

Bank of America (which got $15 billion in bailout money) sent out $24,500 in the first two months of 2009, including $1,500 to House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and another $15,000 to members of the House and Senate banking panels.

Citigroup ($25 billion bailout money) dished out $29,620, including $2,500 to House GOP Eric Cantor, who also got $10,000 from UBS which, while not a TARP recipient, got $5 billion in bailout funds as an AIG “counterparty.”

“This certainly appears to be a case of TARP funds being recycled into campaign contributions,” says Brett Kappel, a D.C. lawyer who tracks donations.

The following recipients of President Obama’s bailout rank among his top 20 contributors to his 2008 presidential election campaign. The names listed include how much they donated to the Obama presidential campaign.

Goldman Sachs: $955,473
Citigroup: $653,468
JP Morgan Chase & Co.: $646,058
Morgan Stanley: $485,823

Three other banks that were significant contributors to Obama received money through AIG:

Bank of America: $274,493
Wachovia: $214,151
AIG: $112,170

While Washington officials still claim to be the only super power left in the World, China’s leaders have been taking steps to show just how nervous they are about a weaker dollar as the U.S. runs up massive deficits to shore up its crumbling economy and financial system. In the past two weeks, China signed multibillion-dollar currency-swap agreements with Indonesia and Argentina that effectively allow Beijing’s two trading partners to bypass the dollar as a medium of exchange. The deals followed similar swaps China has hammered out over the past six months with Malaysia, Hong Kong and South Korea. The combined value of the various swaps — which enable the central banks of China’s trading partners to sell yuan to local importers to buy Chinese goods — is nearly $100 billion.

China has historically used U.S. dollars to conduct its external trade. But with some 70% of its $2 trillion in foreign reserves parked in the U.S. currency, China is searching for ways to diversify. Beijing’s main concern is that the dollar will inevitably weaken, eroding the value of its holdings, due to the growing U.S. budget deficit that is expected to swell to more than $1.75 trillion in 2009, the country’s largest debt load as a percentage of GDP since World War II. “This is the tip of the iceberg,” warns Joseph Tan, the chief Asia economist for private banking at Credit Suisse. “It doesn’t look promising for the dollar.”

There have been other recent hassles with dollar-based trade. When U.S. financial institutions like AIG and Lehman Brothers began to disintegrate in 2008, global money markets were so roiled it became expensive for any trade to be done at all in dollars. “What precipitated [China’s swap agreements] was the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the worries over trade financing at that time,” says Johanna Chua, a regional economist with Citigroup in Hong Kong. “If the dollar is extremely volatile it costs more to hedge.”

The swap agreements China has hashed out circumvent most of these problems. A Malaysian clothing store, for example, that buys shirts and dresses from China can now use its local currency, the ringgit, to pay for its purchases. Because it no longer has to pay a bank a fee to convert ringgit into dollars, transaction costs are reduced. Similarly, a Chinese company buying Malaysian palm oil can make its purchases in yuan.

So what is the point of China issuing all these swaps? “This is a contingency plan in case the dollar implodes,” says Fox-Pitt Kelton’s Matthews. “It is a way of continuing trade with its major trading partners.”

In today’s market it is unfair for a currency of one country to dominate trading. To be fair means that trading be conducted between countries based only on the currency of the 2 trading countries’ currency and not on the US dollar. If the World trade was conducted this way the global economic crisis would never have occured. If countries traded using their own respective currency then the US economic crisis would have been been just a US crisis. If every country started to trade with other countries using their currencies then the US and the EU would no longer have control over their trade.

Another safety to overt another global economic crisis would be to have all of the World’s currency be at parity with each other. This way no single country can interfere or influence the market and the sovereignty of any other country. Today it makes no sense to have the US dollar be worth more than another currency. Having the US dollar or Euro valued higher than other currencies gives the US and the EU the false notion that they somehow rule the World. It creates the illusion that since their currency is artificially inflated that they have the right to control other sovereign countries’ markets and resources.

Money has the illusion that the more you have the more superior you are. In reality no country is better than another. No race of people is better than another. We are all human beings, equals to each other. Slavery has been abolished, so why do you continue to be slaves to the US dollar or the Euro?

“We buy things we don’t need, to impress people we don’t like, with money we don’t have?” Instead of mastering money, we’ve become its slaves–literally.

By STUART VARNEY

I must be naive. I really thought the administration would welcome the return of bank bailout money. Some $340 million in TARP cash flowed back this week from four small banks in Louisiana, New York, Indiana and California. This isn’t much when we routinely talk in trillions, but clearly that money has not been wasted or otherwise sunk down Wall Street’s black hole. So why no cheering as the cash comes back?

My answer: The government wants to control the banks, just as it now controls GM and Chrysler, and will surely control the health industry in the not-too-distant future. Keeping them TARP-stuffed is the key to control. And for this intensely political president, mere influence is not enough. The White House wants to tell ‘em what to do. Control. Direct. Command.

It is not for nothing that rage has been turned on those wicked financiers. The banks are at the core of the administration’s thrust: By managing the money, government can steer the whole economy even more firmly down the left fork in the road.

If the banks are forced to keep TARP cash — which was often forced on them in the first place — the Obama team can work its will on the financial system to unprecedented degree. That’s what’s happening right now.

Here’s a true story first reported by my Fox News colleague Andrew Napolitano (with the names and some details obscured to prevent retaliation). Under the Bush team a prominent and profitable bank, under threat of a damaging public audit, was forced to accept less than $1 billion of TARP money. The government insisted on buying a new class of preferred stock which gave it a tiny, minority position. The money flowed to the bank. Arguably, back then, the Bush administration was acting for purely economic reasons. It wanted to recapitalize the banks to halt a financial panic.

Fast forward to today, and that same bank is begging to give the money back. The chairman offers to write a check, now, with interest. He’s been sitting on the cash for months and has felt the dead hand of government threatening to run his business and dictate pay scales. He sees the writing on the wall and he wants out. But the Obama team says no, since unlike the smaller banks that gave their TARP money back, this bank is far more prominent. The bank has also been threatened with “adverse” consequences if its chairman persists. That’s politics talking, not economics.

Think about it: If Rick Wagoner can be fired and compact cars can be mandated, why can’t a bank with a vault full of TARP money be told where to lend? And since politics drives this administration, why can’t special loans and terms be offered to favored constituents, favored industries, or even favored regions? Our prosperity has never been based on the political allocation of credit — until now.

Which brings me to the Pay for Performance Act, just passed by the House. This is an outstanding example of class warfare. I’m an Englishman. We invented class warfare, and I know it when I see it. This legislation allows the administration to dictate pay for anyone working in any company that takes a dime of TARP money. This is a whip with which to thrash the unpopular bankers, a tool to advance the Obama administration’s goal of controlling the financial system.

After 35 years in America, I never thought I would see this. I still can’t quite believe we will sit by as this crisis is used to hand control of our economy over to government. But here we are, on the brink. Clearly, I have been naive.

On July 16, 2002, Ken Lay, former CEO of ENRON was successfully indicted by a grand jury on 11 counts of securities fraud and related charges where investors lost billions. Today the US taxpayers have lost over $8.5 trillion and instead of administering justice US president Obama adds more $trillions to their loses

There is a cure for the US and global economic crisis. This cure is a viable, fast acting and very cheap solution to resolve and end this financial haemorrhaging. The main elements of the US financial crisis are all based on activities that are already deemed illegal under US law. How the major US banks and insurance companies got into their respective financial messes was the direct result of the banks and insurance companies, knowingly and willing participating in securities fraud. Each and every bank that has received US taxpayers money in the form of US president’s bailout schemes did engage in securities fraud. All have arrogantly admitted to committing these crimes in order to coerce the US Congress into handing out $trillion loans and bonuses - to buy worthless stock and debt. The cure for the US and global economic crisis is to use the existing laws to charge and imprison all those responsible for the economic crisis. The US FBI and SEC have all the evidence they need to successfully indict and imprison all those involved, including the heads of the US Federal Reserve (all those who served under both Bush and Obama ), the CEOs of the banks that fraudulently received US tax dollars from both Bush and Obama, the former Treasury Secretary (CEO of Golden Sachs) Henry Paulson, the current Treasury Secretary (former head of Federal Reserve Bank New York) Timothy Geithner (admitted to committing the federal crime of tax evasion), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, former president George W Bush, former vice-president Dick Cheney, and current president of the United States of America Barack Hussein Obama. All have conspired to commit an offense against the United States - to defraud the United States.

“Let every American, every lover of liberty, every well wisher to his posterity, swear by the blood of the Revolution, never to violate in the least particular, the laws of the country; and never to tolerate their violation by others.” Abraham Lincoln, January 27, 1838

The US did not need an Obama change. The US people needed for their government to simply adhere to the rule of law. The US people already have the best protection against such an economic crisis - the US Constitution. The US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the United States of America. Its laws protect the US and the US people from corrupt government. It purposely made sure that no sitting president had his or her hands on the purse strings of the United States. The US Constitution recognised that man is inherently corrupt so to safeguard the US and its people it specifically laid out who has what authority to do what in the administration of government in the United States. The US Constitution is all the protection the US and the US people needs or will need to protect themselves from corruption.

Article Two of the United States Constitution (Section 4) states that “The President, Vice President, and all other civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.” The crimes that are being committed today, being the root cause of the US economic crisis are crimes of “Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors”. Who are committing these crimes? The evidence points a finger at the shareholders of the US Federal Reserve, the former and current head of the US Federal Reserve, the former and current Treasure Secretary, the former and present President, the former and present Vice President, and other civil Officers (co-conspirators) of the United States.

Securities fraud, also known as stock fraud and investment fraud, is a practice in which investors make purchase or sale decisions on the basis of false information, frequently resulting in losses, in violation of the securities laws.

Generally speaking, securities fraud consists of deceptive practices in the stock and commodity markets, and occurs when investors (in the case of the financial crisis the tax paying US citizens) are enticed to part with their money (tax dollars) based on untrue statements.

Securities fraud includes outright theft from investors and misstatements on a public company’s financial reports. The term also encompasses a wide range of other actions, including insider trading and front-running and other illegal acts on the trading floor of a stock or commodity exchange.

According to the FBI, securities fraud includes false information on a company’s financial statement and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings; lying to corporate auditors; insider trading; stock manipulation schemes, and embezzlement by stockbrokers.

Insider trading

Insider trading is the trading of a corporation’s stock or other security by corporate insiders such as officers, key employees, directors, or holders of more than ten percent of the firm’s shares. In illegal insider trading, an insider or a related party trades based on material non-public information obtained during the performance of the insider’s duties at the corporation, or otherwise misappropriated.

Mutual Fund fraud

A number of major brokerages and mutual fund firms have already been accused of various deceptive acts that disadvantaged customers. Among them were late trading and market timing. Various SEC rules were enacted to curtail this practice but have yet to enforce. Bank of America Capital Management has been accused by the SEC of having undisclosed arrangements with customers to allow short term trading. The SEC knows that crimes are being committed but have yet to hold anyone legally accountable - by way of indictments and imprisonment.

Short Selling

Short selling, including certain types of naked short selling, are all considered securities fraud because they can drive down stock prices. In abusive naked short selling, stock is sold without being borrowed and without any intent to borrow. The practice of spreading false information about stocks, to drive down their prices, is called “short and distort.” During the takeover of The Bear Stearns Companies by J.P. Morgan Chase in March 2008, reports swirled that shorts were spreading rumors to drive down Bear Stearns’ share price. Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., said this was more than rumors and said, “This is about collusion.” Every major bank in the US have admitted to engaging in short selling, in one form or another and as a result have devalued their own stocks or the stocks of banks they intended on taking over. Their admission of guilt has yet to be acted on by the SEC and the FBI. It is the job of the SEC and the FBI to indict and imprison anyone who willingly and knowingly engages in any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose.

In short, the US and the World does not need any new changes to the financial system. The US and other countries do not need to make more regulations or pay for more regulators to fix the problem created by their respective corrupt leaders. The US and other foreign countries need only to apply and enforce existing laws. Existing laws have already declared the root cause of the US and global economic crisis. Existing laws already points the finger at political corruption as the root cause of the US and global economic crisis. The law clearly states what actions are legal and what actions are illegal. Apply and enforce the rule of law to any action that the law already deems to be illegal. Indict and imprison all those who have broken any law that has brought about the current US and global economic crisis. Removing from office the President, Vice-President, Treasure Secretary, head of the US Federal Reserve, Speaker of the House and Secretary of State for crimes committed against the United States won’t mean an end to the US it will only mean an end to the corruption that is now plaguing the US. When the law is allowed to bring about order then and only then will you have a Change - a cure to the US and Global economic crisis.

Footnote - The Bush Bailouts and the Obama Stimulus Packages are bankrupting the nation, not bank bad debt and mortgage foreclosures. Bank bad debts and mortgage foreclosures amounted to $billions. Bush and Obama’s defrauding and money laundering bailouts and stimulus packages have amounted to over $8.5 trillion in less than 6 months. To this day no one has audited any of the banks that have claimed $billion loses and as a result of their claimed loses have received $billions in taxpayers money. There has never been an accounting audit done which would show the US people how much was actual bad debt and how much was just fraudulent claims. A financial audit, or more accurately, an audit of financial statements, is the review of the financial statements of a company or any other legal entity (including governments), resulting in the publication of an independent opinion on whether or not those financial statements are relevant, accurate, complete, and fairly presented. The audit is designed to reduce the possibility of a material misstatement. A misstatement is defined as false or missing information, whether caused by fraud (including deliberate misstatement) or error.

Yesterday at the G20 summit US president Obama conceded U.S. culpability in starting the global financial crisis. Yes the Global economic crisis did first originated in the US but the US people are not responsible for the crisis. The corrupt US government, not the US people, are the architects of the US economic crisis. The White House to be more specific has and is still conspiring to defraud the US people. Their scheme was hatched to defraud the US people of $trillions in US taxpayers’ money . The scheme involved money laundering the US tax dollars. Bankers that put both Bush and Obama in office with their $million campaign contributions are the sole beneficiaries of the Bush’s Buyout Scheme and Obama’s Bank Bonuses Scheme. To be more specific, the bankers that are the shareholders of the privately owned US Federal Reserve, have conspired with former president Bush and current president Obama to defraud the US people.

US Code
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 19 >
§ 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

Most Americans don’t know that the share holders of the privately owned US Federal Reserve includes not just US banks but also foreign banks. The fact that the shareholders of the US Federal Reserve also includes foreign bankers makes their defrauding by money laundering scheme a global issue. The US financial crisis is a global crisis because of the shareholders of the US Federal Reserve are money laundering the US taxpayers’ money to their foreign banks - recently exposed with the AIG financial crisis whereby AIG is being used as the money laundering central.

It is important to note that only the shareholder banks that make up the US Federal Reserve have received $billion bailout funds and have rewarded themselves huge bonuses as payment for successfully swindling $trillions from the US people. Just as important is the fact that Obama isn’t helping out the American people at all. Where is Obama getting the money for his taxpayer money laundering scheme? The money is coming form the US people by way of taxes. Obama is taking money from Peter to pay Paul - that is to say Obama is helping those in financial trouble by taking more money from your friends, neighbours, your own siblings and eventually from your future earnings to help you meet your mortgage or car payments. The kicker is that the funds he’s money laundering to you to help you weather the crisis (the crisis they created in the first place), amounts to a penny on the dollar. The other $0.99 is being money laundered to his banking buddies who give him a nice multi $billion kickback - money held in trust for Obama and co-conspirators in the bankers’ offshore accounts.

Shareholders of the US Federal Reserve include both US and foreign banks. They include:

* BNP Paribas Securities Corp.
* Bank of America Securities LLC
* Barclays Capital Inc.
* Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
* Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
* Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
* Daiwa Securities America Inc.
* Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
* Dresdner Kleinwort Securities LLC.
* Goldman, Sachs & Co.
* Greenwich Capital Markets Inc.
* HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.
* J. P. Morgan Securities Inc.
* Merrill Lynch Government Securities Inc.
* Mizuho Securities USA Inc.
* Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
* UBS Securities LLC.

No financial crisis for White House co-conspirators.

There is no real financial crisis in the US. How can you declare a financial crisis and immediately give yourself large pay raises and bonuses. There is no financial crisis for the entire staff of The Pentagon, US Senators and US Federal Reserve shareholders. Obama has now become a willing co-conspirator in ripping off the US people. On Jan 29th 2009 US Senators gave themselves a $4,700 Raise, at the same time they were declaring a US financial crisis. Must be nice to not even need your salary — because when one senator in D.C. was asked if Congress should have accepted a $4,700 pay raise per member in a failing economy, he defended himself by saying he donates his entire salary to the community anyway. So with the economy spiraling downhill and Congress signing away taxpayer money for Bailouts ‘R Us as people are losing jobs and struggling to pay bills they go and vote themselves a $4700 per member raise!

The private bankers and shareholders that make up the US Federal Reserve all gave themselves very large, $billion bonuses immediately upon George W Bush signing. There is absolutely no accounting or accountability asked or required by the former Bush administration and the current Obama administration of the share holders of the privately owned US Federal Reserve banks.

No one will actually know whether or not the entire Bush Bonus Bailout or Obama’s Stimulus Plan went to bonuses or to helping the American people. All indications reveal that the American people have not received a penny from the Bush money-laundering and securities fraud scam. If they had then Obama would not have needed to ask for another $870 billion in a stimulus money-laundering scam.

Under the Obama administration and immediately after Obama signed the US stimulus package, the Pentagon issued performance pay and bonuses averaging 8.35 percent. Nearly all of the employees in the Defense Department’s new personnel system were rewarded for their job performance in their first paychecks of 2009, with the average pay raise and bonus totaling 8.35 percent. According to figures issued by the Pentagon on Wednesday, 98 percent of the more than 170,000 employees received this higher than average pay raise on the heels of Obama’s signing.

Is looks like the US people have been deceived, not only by George W Bush but now by Barack Obama. Is there a real economic crisis or not? According to the US government there isn’t. If there was a real economic crisis why would the shareholders of the private banks that make up the US Federal Reserve all give themselves multi $billion bonuses? If there was why would US Senators give themselves above average pay raises while they are telling the US people its time to tighten their belts in order to survive the purported financial crisis? If there was a financial crisis why would the entire Pentagon staff receive larger than normal pay raises the day US President Obama signed the US Stimulus package?

In order to get their greedy little hand on $trillions they use propaganda - declaring without evidence to support their claims that the US and the World is in a economic crisis. The economic crisis scheme was created by the privately owned US Federal Reserve. The economic crisis was created by the bankers and shareholders of the US Federal Reserve who allowed US people with very low income and even on social assistance to buy a home they knew they could never afford. The economic crisis was created by US Federal Reserve passing out credit cards to everyone even though the majority had no money or credit to be issued a credit card in the first place. The economic crisis is getting out of control only because the US politicians and their bankers are adding to the US national debt - $trillion Bailout and Stimulus Packages The US presidents Bush and Obama are both using economic terrorism to take money from the pockets of every US citizen to give themselves huge pay raises and bonuses. Both presidents have threatened the US citizens to heed to their demands of $trillions funding or face financial ruin and doom. Failure to pass the near trillion-dollar stimulus, Obama said, would “turn a crisis into a catastrophe.” “So I analyzed that and decided I didn’t want to be the president during a depression greater than the Great Depression, or the beginning of a depression greater than the Great Depression.” –George W. Bush, Washington D.C., Dec. 18, 2008.

The key money laundering and fraud players from the Bush administration are: From l., Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, President George W. Bush, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, and Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox

How the crisis started.

The crisis only manifested after Bush and Obama started declaring that there was a financial crisis. The mortgage foreclosures only started after Bank of America (share holder of the US Federal Reserve) called on the mortgages and loans to be paid immediately, even when those who couldn’t afford the mortgages in the first place didn’t even default on payment. The financial crisis only started after the daily barrage of propaganda by the US White House (both Bush and Obama) and the privately owned US Federal Reserve. Small businesses started laying off workers only after both the US White House and the US Federal Reserve declared there was a financial crisis. The stock market started spiraling downward only after the bankers that make up the US federal Reserve fraudulently devalued their own stock value. They did this as a means to take over control of their rival banks and small town banks that they had no previous influence or stake in. So you see the US White House and the shareholders of the private US Federal Reserve orchestrated the US financial crisis. Had US lawmakers and the SEC looked at the financial books of the banks that make up the US Federal Reserve they would have seen that the bankers of the US Federal Reserve conspired to destroy the United States of America. They intentionally devalued the market in order to defraud the US people of $trillions. They used an elaborate money laundering scheme to hide their crimes against the US and the US people.

The Bush administration and the shareholders of the US Federal Reserve and now Barack Obama’s administration are all enemies of the United States. They are all involved in a conspiracy to defraud the American people as a means to bankrupt the United States - acts of treason. The Bush Bailouts and the Obama Stimulus Packages are what bankrupted the nation not mortgage foreclosures. Bad debts and mortgage foreclosures amounted to a few $billion. Bush and Obama’s defrauding and money laundering bailouts and stimulus packages have amounted to over $10 trillion in less than 6 months. Bush and Obama are the US economic crisis architects. Their policies have robbed the United States of $trillions and have damaged the US so badly that the US can never recover - the US is beyond bankruptcy they are now in receivership.

Article Two of the United States Constitution (Section 4) states that “The President, Vice President, and all other civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

To understand how government has turned AIG into a money laundering scheme, the bailout timeline must be reviewed:

September 16, 2008: The Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Tim Geithner, President) was authorized to create a 24-month line of credit for AIG, worth $85 billion. In exchange for the credit, the U.S. government (the U.S. Taxpayer) received a 79.9 percent equity stake in AIG.

October 9, 2008: AIG borrowed an additional $37.8 billion via a second secured asset credit facility created by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Tim Geithner, President).

November 10, 2008: The U.S. Treasury announced it would purchase $40 billion in newly issued AIG senior preferred stock, under the authority of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act.

So AIG has received approximately $170 BILLION in taxpayer bailouts. Congress and Timothy Geithner (remember him? He’s now the Treasury Secretary) is using AIG to funnel money to places you wouldn’t approve of and they’re now crying foul over the AIG bonuses so you don’t notice what’s really going on.

Think about it. We’ve shelled out $170 BILLION in bailout money to AIG, and U.S. Senators are supposedly worried about $165 million in executive bonuses?

What are members of Congress hiding?

Did you know that money given to AIG was then handed off to American banks? Yes folks, about $44 BILLION of that $170 BILLION was given to American banks like Bank of America. Does Bank of America sound familiar to you? It should, they received their own bailout money under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, a.k.a. TARP funds. They were given $45 BILLION in that deal.

So why did Congress use AIG to funnel even more money to Bank of America? Why the shell game?

Did you know that money given to AIG was then handed off to foreign banks? Yes folks, about $62 BILLION was given to banks in England, Germany, France and others.

Why the shell game? U.S. taxpayer money went to a failing bank in Germany? Why isn’t America outraged by that? America isn’t outraged because America doesn’t know that fact. Congress doesn’t want you to know that fact, that’s why they are pretending to be upset about the AIG bonuses. It’s a scripted distraction.

Members of the House and Senate are trying to pull the wool over American eyes with false claims of wrongdoing by AIG. Barney Frank for example is saying “This is outrage, there should be some oversight,” in talking about the bonuses.

We need some oversight all right!

Remember, Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) wrote an amendment to the bailout bill allowing those AIG bonuses, and the Senate approved it.

So of the $170 BILLION taxpayer dollars given to AIG, about 35 percent of that went to foreign countries. Congress hasn’t cried foul about that. The President hasn’t cried foul about that. Let alone even talked about it!

Of the $170 BILLION taxpayer dollars given to AIG, less than 1 percent went towards executive bonuses. But President Obama and Congress sure are complaining about those bonuses!

Think about that, what does pretending to be surprised and angry about bonuses Obama, Schumer, Dodd, Frank already knew about really fix? Are we to believe that trying to recall $165 million in bonuses actually fixes anything?

The President and Congress are trying to distract you from what’s really going on. With an 80 percent stake in AIG, the government now gets to tell AIG what to do, hence, money being shifted to foreign banks. The President and members of Congress are trying to paint AIG the bad guy, so you don’t see that your hard-earned money is going to failing banks overseas.

If the American public knew money was going to be fed to foreign banks via AIG, if the American public knew more money was being fed via AIG to failing American banks ON TOP OF bailout money the likes of CitiGroup already received - America would have rejected the bailouts with vigor. It seems Congress anticipated that.

Many of our elected officials have no honor.

Contact your elected official today and let them know you’re onto them.

You know that old saying ” when you point the finger at someone, the rest of the fingers are pointing back at you”

President Barack Obama says the government has been “asleep at the switch” when it comes to overseeing the nation’s financial system. He says Americans are “feeling frustrated that there’s not a lot of adult supervision.”

The irony is that Citigroup’s primary federal regulator is Timothy Geithner. Mr. Geithner has been the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. He is President Obama’s new Secretary of the Treasury. Geithner’s position includes a large role in directing the nation’s economic response to the financial crisis which began after the last boom peaked in December 2007 - the same time Mr Geithner served as the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Specific tasks include directing how $350 billion of taxpayers dollars are allocated - in the form of Wall Street Bonuses.

In March 2008, he facilitated the rescue and sale of Bear Stearns. In the same year, he played a pivotal role in both the decision to bail out AIG as well as the government decision not to save Lehman Brothers from bankruptcy. Geithner believes that the United States Department of the Treasury needs to experiment with responses to the financial crisis of 2008. He wants to use the US taxpayers money in an experiment. He wants to risks $billions on his own personal experiment - not on sound time proven financial ethics or standards but on an experiment.

At the Senate confirmation hearings, it was revealed that Geithner had not paid $35,000 in self-employment taxes for several years, even though he had acknowledged his obligation to do so, and had filed a request for, and received, a payment for half the taxes owed - in the US this is a federal crime - tax evasion. The failure to pay self-employment taxes was noted during a 2006 audit by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), in which Geithner was assessed additional taxes of $14,847 for the 2003 and 2004 tax years. Geithner also failed to pay the self-employment taxes for the 2001 and 2002 tax years until after Obama expressed his intent to nominate Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury. Obama went ahead and chose an admitted tax evader - a convict (al Capone was put away for, of all things, tax evasion) to be the Treasure Secretary of the United States.

Geithner has the authority to decide what to do with the second tranche of $350 billion from the $700 billion banking bailout bill passed by Congress in October 2008. He does not need Congressional approval, but went to Congress on February 10-11 to explain his plans. He proposes to create one or more “bad banks” (shell banks) to money launder the US taxpayers money through - increasing in volume shell company wire transfer activity in both dollar amounts and the number of transactions through high-risk correspondent bank accounts. Specifically, extraordinary sums of money will pass through “bad bank” accounts established by Geithner.

Shell corporations are described as companies with no independent assets or operations of their own, which are used by their owners to conduct business dealings or maintain control of other companies. A shell corporation is registered or licensed in the state or country in which it is incorporated or established, is not traded on a securities exchange, and does not operate on its own. While shell corporations are not illegal or improper, money launderers, tax evaders and terrorist financiers have used shell corporations as a means to disguise the illicit nature of their money. They are easily established and can be interlocked with other shell corporations located all over the world. If a shell corporation is established in a jurisdiction with strict secrecy laws, it can be almost impossible to identify the owners or directors of the corporation and therefore nearly impossible to trace illicit funds back to their true owner. This is precisely the effect the launderer, terrorist financier and tax evader seeks, and is why shell corporations are an effective means of interrupting the paper trail used by investigators.

Shell corporations typically exist only on paper. The corporation’s formation documents may list a valid bank account and little more than the name and address of the lawyer or agent handling the incorporation, some officers, and perhaps a few shareholders. When criminals seek to utilize shell corporations to disguise ownership or other illicit activity, they will provide fictitious names or nominee names on the corporate formation documents. These accounts play very important roles in illicit money movements because they can be used to receive deposits and as transfer points to the accounts of other shell corporations, legitimate businesses or individuals. The incorporation documents give shell corporations the outward appearance of legitimate businesses, allowing their bank accounts to be used to receive structured cash deposits designed to avoid currency reporting requirements.

A shell bank is a financial term that describes a financial institution that does not have a physical presence in any country. In order to prevent money laundering Subtitle A of the USA PATRIOT Act specifically prohibits such institutions, with the exception of shell banks that are affiliate (under the control) of a bank that has a physical presence in the U.S. or if the foreign shell bank is subject to supervision by a banking authority in the non-U.S. country regulating the affiliated depository institution, credit union, or foreign bank.

The USA PATRIOT Act includes specific provisions designed to limit the use of correspondent accounts for money laundering activity. These provisions are contained in sections 312, 313 and 319(b) and involve limitations on shell bank relationships as well as enhanced due diligence and record keeping requirements.

Obama and Geithner are using this provision in the USA Patriot Act to claim they have legal rights to engage in the money laundering of US taxpayers through their illegal shell banks set up by Geithner. According to US law they are breaking the laws of the United States. Foreign shell banks have often been noted as being tied to money laundering and other illegal activities. Citibank (Citibank’s primary federal regulator is Timothy Geithner) is leading a fight by the share-holder banks of the privately owned US Federal Reserve to gut the anti-money-laundering laws currently being considered in Congress-laws that could significantly change the way banks do business for their wealthiest clients.

Citibank is seeking an exception to a proposed ban on doing business with shell banks, which have no physical presence and are situated “virtually” in offshore zones to avoid taxes and regulations. The banks are used to hide and launder perhaps billions of dollars a year. “Citibank is the only major bank in the United States that admits to having shell banks as clients, and it doesn’t want to give them up,” says a congressional staffer, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “Citibank is the most active bank trying to gut the ban on shell banks, and the American Bankers Association is trotting behind them.” Citibank has a mole in the US government and his name is Timothy Geithner, Obama’s Secretary of the Treasury.

Even if Obama didn’t become president Citibank still had their illegal shell banking interests protected.

In 2000 Hillary Clinton claimed a Citibank joint checking account valued between $50,001 and $100,000, and a blind trust valued between $500,001 and $1 million. By 2006, the Citibank deposit account was valued between $5 million and $25 million, and the blind trust was reported to have grown also to a value somewhere between $5 million and $25 million.

READER UPDATE - U.S. Justice Department investigators have traced 64 BILLION dollars that are missing and un-accountable from the Bernard Madoff Ponzi Scheme, and have actually traced these funds to the naked derivatives linked to American International Group (AIG). You, the Taxpayers of the United States, are expected to pay for this crime spree of toxic derivatives that have bankrupted the United States of America. Note: A derivative is a naked option with no collateral or underlying futures contract beneath it. The concept of naked derivative trading was actually opposed by the Chair of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Brooksley Born, in 1997. She was later threatened and blackmailed by former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and former U.S. Treasury Secretary and Citibank CEO, Robert Rubin in order to gain Born’s silence and acquiesence to this derivative aka financial Ponzi Scheme.

Robert Rubin allowed both Bill and Hillary Clinton, to withdraw a major amount of their STOLEN U.S. Treasury funds from Citibank even after the U.S. Marshals had ordered Rubin to freeze the accounts.

The 379 point increase in the Dow Jones Industrial Average that occurred on Tuesday, March 10th, was reported to be a “financial black op” engineered by current Federal Reserve Chairman Bernard Bernanke, and U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

The “financial black op” took place when the U.S. Treasury Timothy Geithner ecided to conduct one of his experiment - a “stress test” or a bogus audit on the TRILLION dollars of Citibank derivatives. Goldman Sachs was tipped off ten (10) minutes in advance of the Citibank announcement by the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve and, accordingly, made MILLIONS of dollars in day trading profits in the Dow Futures Index.

The derivatives were actually removed from Citibank with part of them parked in a U.S. Treasury Annex and the rest parked in the Key Bank located in Salt Lake City, Utah. The Obama Administration is actually considering placing these derivatives in various charitable foundations. Charitable foundations are non-taxable and, accordingly, the charitable foundations could actually write off the derivatives as the assets depreciate.

Hamid Karzai (Middle Row, Third from Left) aided and abetted US Special Forces in their attack against his own country - Treason is defined as the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign’s family.

The Afghan traitor Hamid Karzai has been trying to win votes in Afghanistan’s presidential election by backing a law the UN says legalises rape within marriage and bans wives from stepping outside their homes without their husbands’ permission.

The Afghan illegitimate president (a traitor to his country for aiding and abetting the US in an unprovoked attack against his country and for aiding the US in their hunting and murdering of all those who resist their illegal attack and occupation) signed the law earlier this month, despite condemnation by human rights activists and MPs that it flouts the constitution’s equal rights provisions.

The final document has not been published, but the law contains articles that rule women cannot leave the house without their husbands’ permission, that they can only seek work, education or visit the doctor with their husbands’ permission, and that they cannot refuse their husband sex.

A briefing document prepared by the United Nations Development Fund for Women also warns that the law grants custody of children to fathers and grandfathers only.

Senator Humaira Namati, a member of the upper house of the US imposed Afghan parliament, said the law was “worse than during the Taliban”. “Anyone who spoke out against Hamid Karzai’s law was accused of being against Islam,” she said.

The Afghan constitution allows for Shias, who are thought to represent about 10% of the population (the minority), to have a separate family law based on traditional Shia jurisprudence. But the constitution and various international treaties signed by Afghanistan guarantee equal rights for women.

Shinkai Zahine Karokhail, like other female parliamentarians, complained that after an initial deal the law was passed with unprecedented speed and limited debate. “They wanted to pass it almost like a secret negotiation,” she said. “There were lots of things that we wanted to change, but they didn’t want to discuss it because Karzai wants to please the (minority) Shia before the election.”

The ministry of justice confirmed the bill was signed by Karzai. The justice ministry said the law would not be published until various “technical problems” had been ironed out - meaning, not until after the election.

After seven years of unlawfully leading Afghanistan (illegal because he was give the post by the US government that under International law and in violation of the UN Charter illegally engaged in a war of aggression - a war crime - against the sovereign state of Afghanistan) , Karzai is increasingly unpopular at home and abroad and the fixed presidential election in August is expected to be extremely closely fought. A western diplomat said the law represented a “big tick in the box” for the powerful council of Shia clerics.

Ustad Mohammad Akbari, an MP and the leader of a Hazara political party, said the US imposed president had supported the law in order to curry favour among the Hazaras. He tried but failed to sell the notion that the law actually protected women’s rights.

“Men and women have equal rights under Islam but there are differences in the way men and women are created. Men are stronger and women are a little bit weaker; even in the west you do not see women working as firefighters.” In the west there are women firefighters, police officers and combat soldiers.

Akbari said the law gave a woman the right to refuse sexual intercourse with her husband if she was unwell or had another reasonable “excuse”. And he said a woman would not be obliged to remain in her house if an emergency forced her to leave without permission.

The international community has so far shied away from publicly questioning such a politically sensitive issue.

“It is going to be tricky to change because it gets us into territory of being accused of not respecting Afghan culture, which is always difficult,” a western diplomat in Kabul admitted.

Soraya Sobhrang, the head of women’s affairs at the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, said western silence had been “disastrous for women’s rights in Afghanistan”.

“What the international community has done is really shameful. If they had got more involved in the process when it was discussed in parliament we could have stopped it. Because of the election I am not sure we can change it now. It’s too late for that.”

But another senior western diplomat said foreign embassies would intervene when the law is finally published - after the damage has been done.

Hamid Karzai is a traitor to the people of Afghanistan

AIDING AND ABETTING - The guilt of a person in a criminal case may be proved without evidence that he personally did every act involved in the commission of the crime charged. The law recognizes that, ordinarily, anything a person can do for himself may also be accomplished through direction of another person as an agent, or by acting together with, or under the direction of, another person or persons in a joint effort.

So, if the acts or conduct of an agent, employee or other associate of the person are willfully directed or authorized by the person, or if the person aids and abets another person by willfully joining together with that person in the commission of a crime, then the law holds the person responsible for the conduct of that other person just as though the person had engaged in such conduct himself. Before any person can be held criminally responsible for the conduct of others it is necessary that the person willfully associate himself in some way with the crime, and willfully participate in it.