Strict Standards: Only variables should be passed by reference in /home/preswquq/public_html/nbg/fp-includes/core/core.fpdb.class.php on line 302


Benjamin Franklin, in his speech at the conclusion of the Constitutional Convention (September 17, 1787), said: “…I think a General Government [is] necessary for us, and there is no Form of Government but what may be a Blessing to the People if well administered; and I believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism as other forms have done before it, when the People shall become so corrupted as to need Despotic Government, being incapable of any other”.

Democracy is a form of government in which power is held directly or indirectly by citizens under a free electoral system. Even though there is no universally accepted definition of ‘democracy’, there are two principles that any definition of democracy includes. The first principle is that all members of the society (citizens) have equal access to power and the second that all members (citizens) enjoy universally recognized freedoms and liberties. Many people view and interpret “democracy” as political pluralism, equality before the law, the right to petition elected officials for redress of grievances, due process, civil liberties, human rights, and elements of civil society outside the government. However, if any democracy is not carefully legislated to avoid an uneven distribution of political power with balances, such as the separation of powers, then a branch of the system of rule could accumulate power and become harmful to the democracy itself.

President Obama’s plan to save failing U.S. automakers marked a major step across the line that separates a democratic government from despotism.

His announcement Monday of a new position on bailing out Detroit went beyond a desire to be sure tax dollars were not wasted in bailing out struggling companies. It put the Obama administration squarely in the position of adopting a form of government by a single authority, in which government officials, not business executives or the free market, decided what kinds of products a company would make and how it would chart its future. Obama has now declared the he alone wields all the power and authority embodying the state, and everyone else is a subsidiary person.

The notion that it was the president, not car company executives, who would pick such a course drew immediate criticism, especially from conservatives. “When did the president become an expert in strategic corporate management?” said Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), chairman of the conservative Republican Study Committee. “The federal government is famous for its mismanagement, yet this administration continues to demonstrate its certainty that Washington always knows best.”

Sen. Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican, called it a “power grab” that “should send a chill through those who believe in free enterprise.”

And Rush Limbaugh declared in his daily radio broadcast, “There’s always been a line, ladies and gentlemen, over which no president would cross with respect to the distinction between the public and private sectors. Obama has now crossed that line where there is no limit to government’s destruction of private activity or control over it.”

Nevertheless, the White House was admittedly wading into politically challenging waters Monday. Administration officials sought to downplay the notion of an Obama-led takeover of the auto industry.

Looks like Obama has adopted the Bush “I am the decider” power grab. At least with Bush no one took him seriously, because Bush was just a babbling idiot. But with Obama’s self-proclaimed Messiah complex his actions are very threatening. His words implies that he has assumed absolute political power - the Despot. In modern usage, the term “dictator” is generally used to describe a leader who holds and/or abuses an extraordinary amount of personal power, especially the power to make laws without effective restraint by a legislative assembly. Modern dictators have usually come to power in times of emergency. Some dictators, most notably Adolf Hitler in Germany, achieved office as head of government by legal means. However, once he was elected in office, Hitler gained additional extraordinary powers. Many dictators create a cult of personality and have come to favor increasingly grandiloquent titles and honours for themselves. Once a leader assumes dictatorial authority over the nation other actions quickly follow: suspension of elections and of civil liberties; proclamation of a state of emergency; rule by decree; and repression of political opponents without abiding by rule of law procedures. Looks like Obama has completed stage 1. What will follow? I’m betting its going to be a “proclamation of a state of emergency” followed by declaring martial law. Aren’t you glad you took the Obama bait - CHANGE - hook, line and sinker.

Obama gladly signs bank campaign donors reimbursement check (bill)

A substantial portion of Obama Stimulus bill is being used to pay American banks, including Goldman Sachs, Merill Lynch, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wachovia, Morgan Stanley, AIG International, and JP Morgan.

The newly elected US president owes Wall Street bankers a debt of gratitude for generous campaign donations as he ponders how to cope with a financial crisis that poses tough challenges over government aid and regulation for the banking industry.

Staff at banks, Silicon Valley technology companies and universities topped the list of contributors to Barack Obama’s record fundraising treasure chest of $640m.

Goldman Sachs was linked to more donations than any other company as its employees and their families provided $955,473 to the successful Democratic candidate’s fundraising machine.

People associated with JP Morgan provided $646,058 and donors linked to Citigroup gave $653,468 according to figures culled from public disclosures. Three of Citigroup’s 15 directors — Time Warner Chairman Richard Parsons, Xerox CEO Anne Mulcahy, and former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin - are also members of Obama’s transition economic advisory board.

Some such contributions are motivated purely by personal ideology. But experts say that other donors have specific concerns in mind.

“Bankers certainly want to be well represented at the table as the government hands out rescue funds and decides how to regulate the industry going forward,” said Massie Ritsch, a spokesman for the Centre for Responsive Politics that compiled the figures.

Pressing political concerns on Wall Street include the future of tax breaks for private equity firms and hedge funds. Congress has been considering ending a loophole that allows top earners to classify their earnings as lowly rated capital gains, rather than as direct income.

Top fundraisers for Obama included the chairman of Swiss bank UBS’s American arm, Robert Wolf, who generated more than $500,000 for the campaign. Bankers typically gave far more to Obama than to his rival, John McCain. Those linked to Goldman Sachs, for example, only gave $228,695 to the Republican. A Goldman Sachs spokeswoman declined to comment.

On Silicon Valley, people linked to Microsoft and Google contributed a combined $1.4m to Obama’s campaign while McCain, a self-confessed technophobe who does not use email, secured virtually nothing from this potentially reach seam of funding. The Los Angeles Times reported that the Republican received just $20,000 from Google staff.

Obama has been a firm supporter of “net neutrality” which would force internet service providers to give equal access to the web, rather than prioritising certain websites or charging content providers for prominent access to users.

The fundraising figures point to Obama’s unusual success, for a Democratic candidate, in appealing to America’s wealthiest voters in spite of a pledge to raise taxes for those earning more than $250,000 per year.

The following recipients of President Obama’s trickle-down-to-my-donors bailout plan rank among his top 20 contributors to his 2008 presidential election campaign, according to Open Secrets:

Goldman Sachs: $955,473
Citigroup: $653,468
JP Morgan Chase & Co.: $646,058
Morgan Stanley: $485,823

Three other banks that were significant contributors to Obama received money through AIG:

Bank of America: $274,493
Wachovia: $214,151
AIG: $112,170

Lehman Brothers, which did not survive long enough to join the list of banks leaching off the work of the American taxpayer, also gave the Obama campaign $276,088.

Individuals identifying themselves as working for the banks above gave Barack Obama’s presidential campaign $3,617,724. In other words, more than 3.6 million reasons for the president to help focus the media’s glare on the relatively minuscule $165 million in AIG executive bonuses, and away from their $43.5 billion portion of $100 billion of taxpayer dollars the administration, by design or incompetence, filtered to other banks through AIG.

In receiving $43.5 billion for their investment of just over $3.3 million, it looks like the banks that gambled on Wall Street certainly got their money’s worth out of their investment in Barack Obama.

And those executive bonuses which Obama is now complaining about? It was inserted into the Spendulus - an exemption which allow executive bonuses provided they were contracted prior to the Spendulus was passed.

How the US negotiates peace. If a gun is pointed at you what would you do - let them kill you or defend yourself?

The definition of terrorism is:
1. League of Nations Convention (1937): “All criminal acts directed against a State and intended or calculated to create a state of terror in the minds of particular persons or a group of persons or the general public”.
2. UN Resolution language (1999):”1. Strongly condemns all acts, methods and practices of terrorism as criminal and unjustifiable, wherever and by whomsoever committed; 2. Reiterates that criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the general public, a group of persons or particular persons for political purposes are in any circumstance unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or other nature that may be invoked to justify them”.

The US government does not recognize the legitimate use of violence by civilians against the US invader in the occupied countries of Afghanistan and Iraq and would, thus labels all resistance movements as terrorist groups. Others make a distinction between lawful and unlawful use of violence. The US government has labeled all resistance to their unlawful and unprovoked attacks and occupation as enemy or unlawful combatants. Ultimately, the distinction is political. In November 2004, a United Nations Security Council report described terrorism as any act “intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants with the purpose of intimidating a population or compelling a government or an international organization to do or abstain from doing any act. The US government War on Terror is a play on words as the US is engaging in wars of terror against all those who oppose US takeover of their natural resources - in this cases natural gas pipeline in Afghanistan and oil in Iraq. “U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) defined terrorism as: “The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.” It is ironic that the US Department of Defense has defined the actions their government has taken against the people of the United States, the people of Afghanistan, and Iraq and threats against Iran as terrorism.

As far as the US government is concerned everyone who opposes them are “terrorist” yet the victims of the US aggression are actually “freedom fighters”, defending their country and fellow countrymen from the unlawful, unjustified and unprovoked attack by the criminals in control of the US government.

Key criteria that define the current US government as terrorists;

Violence – According to Walter Laqueur of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, “the only general characteristic of terrorism generally agreed upon is that terrorism involves violence and the threat of violence.” - Shock and awe was used by the Bush White House when they launched their cowardly and unprovoked attack against the innocent people of Afghanistan and Iraq. The US attacks were pure acts of violence against the civilian population of Afghanistan and Iraq. Bush and Cheney committed terrorist acts against the people of Afghanistan and Iraq. Neither Afghanistan or Iraq had anything to do with the 9/11 attacks. No hijackers were from either of those 2 countries. No foreign war planes attacked, bombed, or invaded the US on 9/11. No diplomat from either countries made any threats against the US or ordered the attacks against the US yet the US immediately made plans to violently attack them. Both Afghanistan and Iraq are victims of terrorism, wars of aggression, war crimes, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity, perpetrated by the US government. Both countries are victims of the US violent unprovoked attacks that destroyed their country’s and slaughtered millions of their “civilian” population.

Psychological impact and fear – Terrorist attacks are carried out in such a way as to maximize the severity and length of the psychological impact. Each act of terrorism is a “performance,” devised to have an impact on many large audiences. Terrorists also attack national symbols to show their power and to shake the foundation of the country or society they are opposed to. This may negatively affect a government’s legitimacy, while increasing the legitimacy of the given terrorist organization and/or ideology behind a terrorist act. The US government put on quite a “performance” with their terrorist attack against their own country on September 11, 2001. Immediately the US government took control of the media in order to maximize the psychological impact and hyped the fear in the US public. Bush and Cheney carefully chose the World Trade Centers for they were a national symbol of the US financial power. Bush and Cheney are the real terrorists. Government documents revealed that the Patriot Act was drawn up even before the attacks of September 11, 2001 giving evidence of the attacks being premeditated.

Perpetrated for a political goal – Something all terrorist attacks have in common is their perpetration for a political purpose. Terrorism is a political tactic. Rebuilding America Defense detailed the Bush White House political goal even before they stole the White House in the 2000 presidential election. The US Constitution clearly stated that “only” the House of Representatives can decide by vote when a tie occurs in a presidential election yet the George W Bush had his brother decide for the entire nation - through the ruling of one unelected state judge (judge was appointed by Jeb Bush). Rebuilding America Defense is a terrorist doctrine that laid out the entire political goal of the Bush administration.

http://www.newameric … AmericasDefenses.pdf

Deliberate targeting of non-combatants – It is commonly held that the distinctive nature of terrorism lies in its intentional and specific selection of civilians as direct targets. Specifically, the criminal intent is shown when babies, children, mothers, and the elderly are murdered, or injured, and put in harm’s way. Much of the time, the victims of terrorism are targeted not because they are threats, but because they are specific “symbols, tools, animals or corrupt beings” that tie into a specific view of the world that the terrorist possess. Their suffering accomplishes the terrorists’ goals of instilling fear, getting a message out to an audience, or otherwise accomplishing their often radical religious and political ends. When the US government began their war of terror they immediately planned for and launched attacks against civilians. Shock and awe was a deliberate attack against civilians. The US government murdered over 1 million Iraqi civilians by the time George W Bush declared mission accomplished. Even to this day there are daily reports of US military strikes that kill civilians not any opposing army, navy or air force. The US government sees all those who resist their unlawful occupation as a threat to their goals in Iraq and Afghanistan. Every day the US military is ordered on another mission their mission is always against civilians. They murder the innocent civilians as a warning to every one else who would dare to come forward and oppose the illegal occupation of their country. They murder innocent civilians including women and children to invoke perpetual fear in the general population.

Disguise – Terrorists almost invariably pretend to be non-combatants, hide among non-combatants, fight from in the midst of non-combatants, and when they can, strive to mislead and provoke the government soldiers into attacking the wrong people, that the government may be blamed for it. The Bush White House brain washed the US public into believing that they attacked and now occupy other countries to protect the US and the people. They are falsely portraying themselves to be the good guys. The US Congress has known that Bush and Cheney mislead them yet they never even attempted to impeach them and remove them from office. If you and I were to take the list of hijackers as evidence then the Bush government attacked the wrong country and are killing the wrong people because according to the US White House the mastermind behind 9/11 is a Saudi billionaire with ties to the Saudi royal family and the majority of hijackers were Saudi. Their presented evidence declares that Saudi Arabia attacked the US not Afghanistan or Iraq or Iran. The Bush White House evidence clearly lays blame for the killing of US citizens on September 11, 2001 on Saudi Arabia yet they chose to attack 2 innocent countries. The 9/11 Commission Report was commissioned by the White House to hide and cover up the facts that Saudi Arabia helped the Bush administration attack the US.

Unlawfulness or illegitimacy – Some official (notably government) definitions of terrorism add a criterion of illegitimacy or unlawfulness to distinguish between actions authorized by a “legitimate” government (and thus “lawful”) and those of other actors, including individuals and small groups. Using this criterion, actions that would otherwise qualify as terrorism would not be considered terrorism if they were government sanctioned - state terrorism. “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.” This is exemplified when a group that uses irregular military methods is an ally of a State against a mutual enemy, but later falls out with the State and starts to use the same methods against its former ally. A perfect example is the cozy relationship between the US and Iraq’s Saddam Hussein. Saddam fought a proxy war for the US against Iran. Donald Rumsfeld was special envoy to Saddam and he personally hand delivered the Bell helicopters that Saddam used to drop the US made and delivered chemical bombs on Iran and the Kurds who tried to assassinate Saddam. Every day Bush and Cheney declare they were right and had the right to attack Afghanistan and Iraq. They both keep saying the World is behind them - that their unlawful attacks against innocent states is legitimate. To them torturing is legal because they sanctioned it. Both keep on citing executive privilege whenever another major war crime is uncovered that they ordered. Reality is that the attacks against the US on September 11, 2001, against Afghanistan and Iraq are all state sponsored terrorism - all committed by this US government.

The government in the U.S. must be cleansed of corruption and restored to conformity with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights: a restoration of the American Republic. The “anti-terrorist” legislation of October 2001 (and that of April 1995 and Britain’s Terrorism Act of 2000), intended to facilitate government surveillance and control of the people so as to stifle free speech and dissent, must be repealed.

The Bill of Rights is a literal and absolute document. The First Amendment doesn’t say you have a right to speak out unless the government has a ‘compelling interest’ in censoring the Internet. The Second Amendment doesn’t say you have the right to keep and bear arms until some madman plants a bomb. The Fourth Amendment doesn’t say you have a right to be secure from search and seizure unless some FBI agent thinks you fit the profile of a terrorist. The government has no right to interfere with any of these freedoms under any circumstances.

“Those who think that the description of the U.S.A. as “a terrorist state” is too extreme should inform themselves of the nature of the American CIA, which is an international terrorist organization. The CIA implements the policies of the President of the United States. The CIA carries out unofficial U.S. government policy. This means that the United States is a terrorist state.

On October 12th, 2001, a couple of days after the bombing of Afghanistan started, George W. Bush publicly announced to the Afghan people that we will continue to bomb you, unless your leadership turns over to us the people who we suspect of carrying out crimes, although we refuse to give you any evidence. Bush’s threats of continued violence against the Afghan people is a textbook illustration of international terrorism, by the US official definition. That is the use of the threat of force or violence, in this case extreme violence, to obtain political ends through intimidation, fear and so on. That’s the official definition, a textbook illustration of it.

Three weeks later, by the end of October, the war aims changed. British Defense Minister, Sir Admiral Boyce informed the Afghan population that we will continue to bomb you until you change your leadership. Well, that’s an even more dramatic illustration of international terrorism.” — Noam Chomsky

In September 2002 the United States began threatening to bomb Iraq (no doubt killing many thousands of civilians and destroying much of the civilian infrastructure as it did in 1991) unless its leader resigns his position or the people of Iraq somehow manage to remove him (and allow a regime to be installed which is acceptable to Washington). Is it not glaringly obvious that the U.S.A. is a terrorist state?

Fmr. National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski with Osama bin Laden, circa 1979.

Fmr. National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, known for his hardline policies on the Soviet Union, initiated in 1979 a campaign supporting mujaheddin (later renamed al Qaeda) in Pakistan and Afghanistan, which were run by Pakistani security services with financial support from the CIA and Britain’s MI6. This policy had the explicit aim of promoting radical Islamist and anti-Communist forces to overthrow the secular communist People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan government in Afghanistan, which had been destabilized by coup attempts against Hafizullah Amin, the power struggle within the Soviet-supported parcham faction of the PDPA and a subsequent Soviet military intervention.

Years later, in a 1997 CNN/National Security Archive interview, Brzezinski detailed the strategy taken by the Carter administration against the Soviets in 1979:

We immediately launched a twofold process when we heard that the Soviets had entered Afghanistan. The first involved direct reactions and sanctions focused on the Soviet Union, and both the State Department and the National Security Council prepared long lists of sanctions to be adopted, of steps to be taken to increase the international costs to the Soviet Union of their actions. And the second course of action led to my going to Pakistan a month or so after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, for the purpose of coordinating with the Pakistanis a joint response, the purpose of which would be to make the Soviets bleed for as much and as long as is possible; and we engaged in that effort in a collaborative sense with the Saudis, the Egyptians, the British, the Chinese, and we started providing weapons to the Mujaheddin, from various sources again—for example, some Soviet arms from the Egyptians and the Chinese. We even got Soviet arms from the Czechoslovak communist government, since it was obviously susceptible to material incentives; and at some point we started buying arms for the Mujaheddin from the Soviet army in Afghanistan, because that army was increasingly corrupt.

Milt Bearden wrote in The Main Enemy that Brzezinski, in 1980, secured an agreement from the Saudi king to match American contributions to the Afghan effort (of forming al Qaeda) dollar for dollar and that Bill Casey would keep that agreement going through the Reagan administration.

In 1998, Brzezinski was interviewed by the French newspaper Nouvel Observateur on the topic of Afghanistan. He revealed that CIA support for the mujaheddin had started before the 1979 Soviet invasion, knowingly increasing the probability of a Soviet invasion. Brzezinski saw the invasion as an opportunity to embroil the Soviet Union in a bloody conflict comparable to America’s experience in Vietnam. He referred to this as the “Afghan Trap” and viewed the end of the Soviet empire as worth the cost of strengthening militant Islamic groups.

He went on to say in that interview, “What is most important to the history of the world? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?” When the interviewer questioned him about Islamic fundamentalism representing a world menace, Brzezinski said, “Nonsense!”

In his 1997 book The Grand Chessboard, Brzezinski says that assistance to the Afghan resistance was a tactic designed to bog down the Soviet army while the United States built up a deterrent military force in the Persian Gulf to prevent Soviet political or military penetration farther south.

In the mid 1980 the US, wishing to increase its regional influence, worked with the Saudis to import an army of Saudis, Egyptians, and others into Afghanistan. The Saudis chose a member of a wealthy construction family with close royal family ties - Osama bin Laden - to lead the effort . Many of the men bin Laden recruited were connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, a regional fundamentalist group. bin Laden’s newly constructed army (shortly thereafter known as al Qaeda) successfully fought to settle Afghanistan in favor of an Afghan fundamentalist group, the Taliban. The US paid the Al Qaeda army to fight the US battles against all those who oppose the US plans for the region. With the formation of al Qaeda, with US money, the war on terror is the US war “of” terror. The US is using their own covert army to wage a fabricated threat of war against the US in order for the US government to implement US policy in the region. Public record prove that bin Laden was hand picked by Saudi Arabia and the US to form al Qaeda to orchestrate a fabricated war of terror against the US and the World.

Clinton uses US formed al Qaeda as excuse for attempted 1993 World Trade Center gold heist

February 26, 1993 at 12:17 PM - Clinton failed attempt to steal $millions with bombing of World trade Center. A Ryder truck filled with 1,500 pounds (680 kg) of explosives was planted and detonated in the underground garage of the North Tower, opening a 100 foot (30 m) hole through 5 sublevels of concrete leaving six people dead and 50,000 other workers and visitors gasping for air in the shafts of the 110 story towers. One of the world’s largest gold depositories was stored underneath the World Trade Center, owned by a group of commercial banks. The 1993 bomb was detonated next to the vault, but it withstood the explosion, as did the towers. $650 million in gold and silver was being kept in a special vault four floors beneath Four World Trade Center before 9/11. On Nov. 1, 2001 Mayor Rudolph Giuliani announced that “more than $230 million” worth of gold and silver bars that had been stored in a bomb-proof vault had been recovered. Where Clinton didn’t succeed Bush did because $millions are unaccounted for even after finding the vaults in tact after the US Air Force fuel tanker plane attack and controlled demolition of the World Trade Center Towers on September 11, 2001.

New York fiefighter walks through undamagaed gold vault holding over $1 billion. Vault withstood demolition of World Trade Center. Firefighters ordered out after this picture was taken.

An article in the Times Online gives the following rundown of precious metals that were being stored in the WTC vault belonging to Comex.

* Comex metals trading - 3,800 gold bars weighing 12 tonnes and worth more than $100 million
* Comex clients - 800,000 ounces of gold with a value of about $220 million
* Comex clients - 102 million ounces of silver, worth $430 million
* Bank of Nova Scotia - $200 million of gold

Motive for US attacking their own country on September 11, 2001

1995 Unocal, seeking to build a pipeline across Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan (for delivery to energy hungry Asia via the Pakistani Arabian Sea coast), signed an agreement with Turkmenistan for natural gas purchasing rights for transport through a proposed pipeline Unocal also signed an agreement with Turkmenistan for an oil pipeline along the same route.

Aug. 13, 1996 Unocal and Delta Oil Co. of Saudi Arabia signed a memorandum of understanding with Russia’s Gazprom and Turkmenistan’s Turkmenrusgaz to build a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan to Pakistan via Afghanistan.

October 1997 Unocal and other oil companies formed Central Asia Gas Pipeline, Ltd. (CentGas) in preparation for building the trans-Afghanistan pipeline.

1997 US Congress under clinton passed a resolution declaring the Caspian and Caucasus region to be a “zone of vital American interests”.

December 1997 Unocal invited Taliban representatives to their corporate headquarters in Sugarland, TX. to discuss the pipeline project. They were thereafter invited to Washington for meetings with Clinton Administration officials.

January 1998 Unocal agreement signed between Pakistan, Turkmenistan, and the Taliban to arrange funding of the gas pipeline project, with Unocal also considering a Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-Arabian Sea coast oil pipeline.

1998 VP Dick Cheney, then CEO of the giant oil services company, Halliburton, stated: “I cannot think of a time when we have had a region emerge as suddenly to become as strategically significant as the Caspian.”

Preparing for 9/11

February 28, 1998 Unocal VP International Relations addressed US House of Representatives clearly stating that the Taliban government should be removed and replaced by a government acceptable to his company. He argued that creation of a 42 inch oil pipeline across Afghanistan would yield a Western profit increase of 500% by 2015. http://www.ringnebul … ony_USHouse_1998.htm

August 7, 1998 US terrorism army in Afghanistan, al Qaeda, ordered to bomb two US embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

August 20, 1998 Clinton ordered a 75-80 cruise missile attacks on Afghanistan and Sudan targets.

Nov. 1998 The Trade and Development Agency commissioned Enron to perform a feasibility study an east-to-west route, crossing the Caspian Mountains and terminating in Turkey along the Mediterranean. (The route was considered impractical as it would cost an estimated $1 billion more than a route through Afghanistan.)

December 1998 Unocal issued a statement that it had withdrawn from the pipeline project on 12/4/98, noting “business reasons.”

April 30, 1999 Excluding US interests, Afghanistan, Pakistan, & Turkmenistan reactivated the pipeline project.

July 4, 1999 An executive order (13129) was issued by Clinton, freezing US held Taliban assets, & prohibiting trade plus other transactions. Move was taken by Clinton because Taliban were negotiating pipeline deals directly with Pakistan and Turkmenistan without the US.

US starts using their al Qaeda army leader bin Laden as scapegoat for their planned 9/11 attacks

October 15, 1999 Under pressure from the Clinton administration UN Security Council Resolution 1267 imposed sanctions on the Taliban, demanding that the Taliban “turn over the terrorist Usama Bin Laden without further delay…”

October 12, 2000 Clinton orders attack on The USS Cole in the Yemeni port of Aden. Fear and hatred campaign is launched against US formed al Qaeda

Bush administration gearing up for September 11, 2001 attacks

January - Feb 2001 Upon “taking” office, the Bush administration immediately engaged in active negotiations with Taliban representatives with meetings in Washington, DC, Berlin, and Islamabad. During this time the Taliban government hired Laila Helms, niece of former CIA director Richard Helms, as their go-between in negotiations with the US government.

Bush (oil) administration includes:

* Dick Cheney, VP: Until 2000 - President of Halliburton (in position to build the Afghan pipeline).
* Condoleezza Rice, National Security Advisor: 1991-2000 - Manager of Chevron Oil, and Kazakhstan go-between.
* Donald Evans, Sec. Commerce: former CEO, Tom Brown, Inc. (a $1.2 billion oil company).
* Gale Norton, Sec. Interior: former national chairwoman of the Coalition of Republican Environmental Advocates - funded by, among others, BP Amoco.
* Spencer Abraham, Sec. Energy: Up through his failed bid for senatorial reelection in the 2000, he received more oil and gas industry money than all but three other senators (January 1997 through July 2000) (30).
* Thomas White, Secretary of the Army: former Vice Chairman of Enron and a large shareholder of that company’s stock.

US attack on Afghanistan begins before 9/11

May 15, 2001 Regarding the placement of the Unocal Pipeline, a US Official delivered this ultimatum to the Taliban (via the Pakistani delegation acting as their interlocutors): “Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs.”

July 2001 Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary, was told by senior American officials in mid-July (34a) that military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October.

August 2, 2001 Last meeting with the Taliban (5 weeks before the 9/11/01 attack). Christina Rocca, in charge of Central Asian affairs for US government, met with the Taliban Ambassador to Pakistan (Abdul Salam Zaeef) in Islamabad, at which time Taliban representatives were reminded that the US had provided monetary relief assistance.

Augist 22, 2001 John O’Neill - Deputy director FBI, established national expert on the al-Qaeda network and in charge of that investigation, resigned in protest over the Bush Administration’s obstruction of those investigations. (New Yorker 1/14/02 )

August 23, 2001 John O’Neill accepts position as chief of security, World Trade Center buildings. Electronic security for the World Trade Center was provided by Securacom (now Stratesec), a company initially founded with Kuwaiti capital. Marvin P. Bush, President George W. Bush’s youngest brother served as a Securicom/Stratesec board member from 1993 through 2000.

Bush orders Air Force tanker planes painted to look like AA airlines to fly into World Center Buildings

September 11, 2001 George W Bush orders converted US Air Force fuel tanker planes to fly into World Trade Center Towers. The White House will blame their attack on their own country on US Saudi formed al Qaeda. Inadvertently declaring fifteen of the nineteen hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. John O’Neill, WTC security chief, and former deputy director of the FBI, where he headed investigation of the US link to al-Qaeda, was murdered before those buildings were demolished by explosives laid when Marvin P. Bush was head of security for the World Trade Center buildings.

October 7, 2001 Military operations with aerial bombardment began in Afghanistan targetting all those who could give evidence that the US government planned for and executed the attacks of September 11, 2001. US attacks innocent country to kill all potential witnesses- all members of their US terrorist army al Qaeda.

Jan. 29, 2002 CNN reported: “President Bush personally asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle Tuesday to limit the congressional investigation into the events of 9/11/01”

May 30, 2002 Afghanistan, Pakistan and Turkmenistan agreed to construct a gas pipeline to the subcontinent. US military coup replaces Taliban with Afghan Opium drug warlord Hamid Karzai who had formerly functioned as a Unocal Corporation consultant. Afghanistan pipeline now again under US control.

November 2004 The annual US Government estimate for opium poppy cultivation in Afghanistan was released: approximately 206,700 hectares of poppy were grown in 2004, representing a 239% increase in production over 2003 estimates. March 2001 both the UN and the US drug Enforcement Agency went to Afghanistan an confirmed that the Taliban government had completely wiped out the Opium drug trade as per UN aggreement for international Aid. When Bush took office there was no Opium to be found in Afghanistan but in 2004 there was now 206,700 hectares of Opium growing.

George HW Bush, Bill Clinton and George W Bush connection

The 3 Stooges - Then 41st President George HW Bush worked with Saudi Arabia to form al Qaeda, former President Bill Clinton intimately worked with al Qaeda and the Taliban to negotiate building of pipeline then turned on them when Afghanistan wanted control over the pipeline, and lastly drunken coward and idiot George W Bush was dumb enough to order the attacks against his own country and blame it on US created al Qaeda.

stooge n. In experimental methodology, another name for a confederate.

confederate n. A person taking part in a conspiracy. In research methodology, an accomplice of the experimenter in research involving deception, pretending to be an experimental participant or subject, along with the real participants, but actually playing out an assigned role.


Obama has only been president of the United States for a little over 2 months and the only thing that he has shown that he is good at is spending money - actually throwing away money. The US economic crisis is a result of bad debt - uncontrolled spending by the US banks but especially by the US government. Obama was elected to office only because he sold himself as a man of change. In his inauguration speech he arrogantly declared that the US was waiting for him and his government. He declared that only he could bring about the change that the US so desperately needed. The majority of people who voted for him voted for him because he made a promise to end Bush’s wars. Obama has failed at brining about that promise. In fact Obama has ordered more US soldiers to Afghanistan to fight a war that even his own military staff has declared cannot be won. Everyone expected Obama to announce an immediate withdrawal from Iraq. Obama has failed to deliver what the voters expected and wanted from him.

Obama declared that only he can bring about change. Only he has the plan that will work to end the US economic crisis. Obama has failed miserably at handling the finances of the US. He has failed because not only has he spent more money in just 60 days than Bush spent in a 4 year term, the money he’s spent is literally gone - no return for the $trillion so-called investments that will end the US economic crisis, no accounting of who was paid what amount, no receipt for what the US taxpayers got in return for Obama’s spending spree . Obama has not only commited the US people to paying more taxes he has commited the US taxpayers to paying for his lavish $trillion gifts to bank CEOs for generations to come. Obama has used up all of the taxpayers’ dividends and without their knowing he has also spent their pensions and 401ks.

President Barack Obama’s budget would produce $9.3 trillion in deficits over the next decade, more than four times the deficits of Republican George W. Bush’s presidency, congressional auditors have stated.

The new Congressional Budget Office figures offered a far more dire outlook for Obama’s budget than the new administration predicted just last month — a deficit $2.3 trillion worse. It’s a prospect even the president’s own budget director called unsustainable. In his White House run, Obama assailed the economic policies of his predecessor, but the eye-popping deficit numbers threaten to swamp his ambitious agenda of overhauling health care, exploring new energy sources and enacting scores of domestic programs.

The dismal deficit figures, if they prove to be accurate, inevitably raise the prospect that Obama and his Democratic allies controlling Congress would have to consider raising taxes after the recession ends or else pare back his agenda.

By Congressional Budget Office’s calculation, Obama’s budget would generate deficits averaging almost $1 trillion a year of red ink over 2010-2019.

“This report should serve as the wake-up call this administration needs,” said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio. “We simply cannot continue to mortgage our children and grandchildren’s future to pay for bigger and more costly government.” But Obama insisted that his agenda is still on track.

The worsening economy is a direct result of the even deeper fiscal mess implemented by Obama. The deficit for the current budget year, which began Oct. 1, will top $1.8 trillion, $93 billion more than foreseen by the White House. That would equal 13 percent of GDP, a level not seen since World War II. The 2009 deficit, fueled by the $700 billion Wall Street bonuses and diving tax revenues stemming from Obama worsening the recession, is four times the previous $459 billion record set just last year. Obama’s budget plan taxes, spends and borrows too much.

“What we will not cut are investments that will lead to real growth and prosperity over the long term,” Obama said. “That’s why our budget makes a historic commitment to comprehensive health care reform. That’s why it enhances America’s competitiveness by reducing our dependence on foreign oil and building a clean energy economy.”

Bush spent a total of about $21 trillion dollars over 8 years. According to a report Obama’s total spending after his first 50 days in office- $2.29 trillion That equals out to be: $45.8 billion a day for every single day Obama has been in office or $1.908 billion an hour for every single hour Obama has been in office.

The Federal Government’s flood of red ink hit another high-water mark as the Treasury Department quietly reported that the National Debt hit $11-trillion for the first time ever. To be exact, the Debt now stands at $11,033,157,578,669.78. Divide it by the U.S. population and it comes up to over $36,000 in debt for every man, woman and child among us.

And the government is running up mountains of debt with increasing speed. It took just over 5 ½ months for Uncle Sam to go another trillion dollars deeper in debt since hitting $10-trillion last September 30th. It’s the fastest jump in U.S. history. The hundreds of billions of dollars being spent as part of the federal bailout of the financial markets is a leading factor in the rapid increase. Over $400-billion in debt has been accrued in the 57 days since President Obama took office.

And the federal budget he unveiled last month projects even faster increases in the National Debt. It’ll hit $12.7-trillion by the end of the fiscal year on September 30th. The Administration’s four year estimate shows that by the end of September 2012, the Debt will have soared to $16.2-trillion – which amounts to nearly 100% of the projected Gross Domestic Product that year.

The U.S. is running up so much debt so quickly, some investors are worried. Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, who says his country has about a trillion dollars invested in U.S. Treasury notes, said he wanted a guarantee. President Obama said Wen’s got nothing to worry about. “Not just the Chinese government, but every investor, can have absolute confidence in the soundness of investments in the United States,” Obama.

That’s because the U.S. government’s power to tax stands behind all of its debt. If Uncle Sam ever needs a bailout, then as now, taxpayers get nailed. It took the U.S. government 191 years – from 1791 until 1982 – to run up its first trillion dollars in debt. The second and third trillions got on the scoreboard much more quickly – each in just four years.

By the time George W. Bush was inaugurated in 2001, the National Debt stood at $5.7-trillion. He ran up more debt faster than nearly all of his predecessors combined: just under $4.9-trillion.

The National Debt stood at $10.6-trillon on the day Barack Obama took office. But if his budget projections are accurate, he’ll run up nearly as much government debt in four years as President Bush did in eight.

Obama’s budget will make history. If he is allowed to proceed with his out-of-control spending the US taxpayers will be forced into bankruptcy because they won’t be able to sustain the tax burden put on them by Obama’s own personal agenda. Obama is a resounding failure. Real growth and prosperity can never be achieved by recklessly throwing the US taxpayers money as bonuses for already filthy rich bankers. Real growth and prosperity can never be achieved if the nation cannot afford the price tag of Obama’s personal investments plans. Real growth and prosperity can never be achieved if you don’t fix the root of the US economic crisis - uncontrolled spending on gifts for bankers and sustaining Obama’s big government . Real growth and prosperity can only be achieved if you stop spending money the country doesn’t have. Stop stealing the pension funds of the US taxpayers. Stop pouring taxpayers money into wars that are already long lost - in an interview Obama declared that the war in Afghanistan was lost and opened the door to a reconciliation process in which the American military would reach out to moderate elements of the Taliban,. Real growth and prosperity can only be achieved if you stop living like a king and start acting like a real leader.


A war of aggression is a military conflict waged in the absence of “a necessity of self-defense, instant, overwhelming, leaving no choice of means, and no moment of deliberation.” Waging such a war of aggression is a crime under the customary international law.

Wars without international legality (e.g. not out of self-defense, not sanctioned by the United Nations Security Council, and not sanctioned by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations) are considered wars of aggression.

The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, called the waging of aggressive war “essentially an evil thing…to initiate a war of aggression…is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

When you look at the evidence, concrete evidence, the US attacks against and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan are both supreme international crimes. Neither countries attacked the US. Neither countries had financed, trained or provided hijackers for the attacks of September 11, 2001. When asked by reporters what Iraq had to do with 9/11 war criminal George W Bush said “absolutely nothing”. According to the US own FBI reports there were no hijackers or terrorists from Iraq or Afghanistan. The FBI has even reported that bin Laden is not wanted for the attacks of 9/11 because there is no evidence whatsoever to link bin Laden to the 9/11 attacks. The FBI does implicate Saudi Arabia for the attacks and has the most concrete evidence to back their investigative findings that Saudi Arabia conspired to attack the US on September 11, 2001. The concrete evidence is the names of the hijackers and the alleged mastermind - bin Laden. The majority of hijackers were Saudi nationals (Fifteen of the 19 September 11 hijackers were Saudis.), the alleged mastermind is Saudi and the hijackers received funding from a Saudi royal princess - Princess Haifa Al-Faisal, wife of Saudi ambassador to the United States. These are all confirmed facts. The facts are clear. The US attacks and occupations of both Iraq and Afghanistan are wars of aggression - supreme international crimes. The US wars are wars of aggression, their initiated military conflicts were both waged in the absence of “a necessity of self-defense”. Neither Iraq or Afghanistan had the capability to launch an attack against the US, not in 2001, not now. Both Iraq and Afghanistan were allies of the US. Iraq fought the US proxy war with Iran. The Taliban were former members of the Mujaheddin who the US supplied with money, weapons and training to oust the Soviet Union from Afghanistan.

For George W Bush to plan for and wage wars against 2 completely innocent countries, in violation of both US and International laws, clearly finds George W Bush guilty of wars of aggression, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity and war crimes. For president Obama to allow both wars to continue in violation of US and International laws makes Obama a war criminal. In spite of all the facts and evidence that the wars are unlawful, Obama has decided to commit more US troops to Afghanistan. The Taliban were illegally ousted by George W Bush. The US attacked Afghanistan even though Afghanistan did not attack the US. There was no threat from Afghanistan. In fact the Taliban were negotiating with US Unocal to build the Afghan’s people financial future - the natural gas pipeline. In December 1997 (under the Clinton Administration) A senior delegation from the Taliban government in Afghanistan was in the United States for talks with international energy company Unocal that was bidding for the contract to construct a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan across Afghanistan to Pakistan.

A spokesman for Unocal, said the Taliban were expected to spend several days at the company’s headquarters in Sugarland, Texas. Unocal says it has agreements both with Turkmenistan to sell its gas and with Pakistan to buy it.

The US attack Afghanistan not out of self-defense but to take control of the natural gas pipeline and to revive the Opium drug trade which the Taliban had completely wiped out.

Obama is no better than George W Bush for he continues the Bush policies. A president of change would undo everything that the Bush administration has illegally done. Instead Obama is planning to expand on the illegal polices of the Bush administration by continuing the unlawful wars and occupations of 2 innocent and sovereign states. There are no Iraqi or Afghan tanks, aircraft or warships attacking the US. The US is attacking and killing innocent civilians in both Iraq and Afghanistan. The US military operations are all against civilians. Obama is as much of a war criminal as George W Bush and his fellow war criminals. Change meant only the person who now sits in the White House and orders his military to attack and kill more innocent men, women and children.


According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program, robbery is, “the taking or attempting to take anything of value from the care, custody, or control of a person or persons by force or threat of force or violence and/or by putting the victim in fear.”

The Truth Behind All These Bailouts

US government’s $700 billion bailout - The plan allows the government to buy the bad debt of U.S. financial institutions for the next two years, according to a draft of the legislation. It gives the Treasury secretary the authority to buy $700 billion in mortgage-related assets, in a bid to address the root cause of the turmoil that swept through markets and resulted in the filing for bankruptcy by and government takeovers of some of the biggest U.S. financial companies.” However, Senator Schumer of New York noted that the plan “includes no visible protection for taxpayers.”

The American taxpayer is the designated sucker in these bailout plans.The American taxpayer has already been the designated sucker for the bankruptcies of Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and AIG. By making the American taxpayer the sucker, this allows all banking executives and Wall Street executives to keep the hundreds of millions of dollars in salaries, stock options, and bonuses that they have taken over the past several years.

The biggest bailout in economic history, a plan so important to the future of every American, should have as a prerequisite for passage a carefully and intelligent moderated public debate for at least one week at a minimum. Instead, there is a sense of desperation to pass this legislation as quickly as possible, an urgency that can only be interpreted to mean that there is something very unpalatable about this plan.

The architects of these bailout and stimulus plans have been discussing their plans for months. If you really believe that Hank Paulson and friends must pass the plan to save the U.S. and global financial system with no real debate due to its “urgency” as it is being painted, then you need to return to the Land of Oz where delusions predominate. It is being painted as a frantic plan put together in the wee hours of the night, just as the bailout of Bear Stearns was, so that zero debate can occur in regard to the most unpalatable elements of this plan that are the most destructive to every American citizen.

Who will likely ultimately pay for this new bailout plan? The Congressional hearing between Senator Jim Bunning and U.S. Secretary of Treasury Hank Paulson regarding the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout plan reveals who will pay dearly.

Senator Jim Bunning: “Where will the money come from if in fact we have to use the backstop?”

Secretary Paulson: “As, as, as, as, I said to you, that, uh, that, it is my very strong belief that the way we can minimize the cost to the taxpayer, the way to minimize that cost in all likelihood is to be unspecified and to enhance confidence in, in, in the market. So that’s my answer. It continues to be my answer.”

Senator Bunning: “But it doesn’t answer the question. Where is the money going to come from if you have to put it up?”

Secretary of Treasury Paulson: “Well obviously it will come from the government.”

Senator Bunning: “And who is the government?”

Secretary Paulson: “The taxpayer.”

Paulson argues that costs of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout to all Americans can be minimized by approving an “unspecified” line of credit, in essence a blank check, to bail them out.

The way to minimize the cost to the taxpayer would have been to cap the bailout number for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, instead of leaving it unspecified and unlimited.

Whatever positive story is spun from this bailout, that all of these bailouts are literally taking tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars out of the pocket of every working American (over generations).

Where Does the Money Come From?

Given that these cumulative bailouts are now in the range of trillions of dollars, what happens if American taxpayers can’t come up with this money? Again, official government numbers for this bailout are not credible. For example, the “official” cost to the U.S. taxpayer of $200 billion for the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is highly delusional and grossly underestimated. The final cost is much more likely to be north of $1 trillion. And oh, by the way, the U.S. government, by making U.S. taxpayers responsible for covering the losses of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has also implicitly stated in this action, that they have zero problem with having Americans subsidize the losses of China, Japan, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Cayman Islands. Since those five countries were the largest holders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac debt, American taxpayer money is being used to bailout the debt of those countries as well.

The loser will not be just American taxpayers, but all Americans, American taxpayers and their children too. There is no way that the government can squeeze trillions and trillions of dollars out of the American taxpayer to socialize 100% the losses of the U.S. banking industry and Wall Street. While this is true, they will squeeze as much as they can out of the American taxpayer until the squeezing process becomes like trying to squeeze blood from a turnip. At this point, as Senator Bunning said, “WHERE WILL THE MONEY COME FROM?”

As Secretary Paulson already established in Congressional testimony, he considers the people the government even though we have no say in the legislation that socializes these losses. But we’ve also established that once the people have no more money, that the bailout plans will likely still be short trillions and trillions of dollars. So “Where does the money come from?” The answer, again, is “the people!”.

The money the government can’t squeeze out of the people for these massive bailouts will have to come from the printing presses of the U.S. Federal Reserve. Printing trillions of dollars can pay the balance of these losses but also guarantees erosion in the value of the dollar. Imagine that the bailout causes the dollar to erode another “X”% over the next five years. If his happens, then this results in a loss of purchasing power parity for all Americans at home and abroad. In essence, it acts like an invisible tax. For all intents and purposes, if the dollar erodes by 30% over the next two years because of this near guaranteed monetary expansion, it matters not whether the government imposed a 30% tax on all American’s savings to achieve this or whether it happened because of massive monetary expansion. The end result is the same. So, WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM? The answer, sadly, is not the government, but still the people.

The third President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, once stated, “If the American people ever allow the banks to control issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers occupied.” Right now, Jefferson must be rolling over in his grave now because not only could we not figure out how to prevent what he warned us was going to happen even though we had 200 years to figure it out, but we were also so blind that we cheered the very events in the 80’s and 90’s that brought us the crisis we have today. However, the architects of this bailout must be smiling today, because they are in the process of committing the largest robbery of American wealth in history since the Great Depression. As for us, we’re still asleep at the wheel, still oblivious to this robbery, and still content to believe every word we’re told to believe instead of thinking for ourselves.


Washington, DC — December 31, 2008 - Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released its 2008 list of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians.” The list, in alphabetical order, includes:

Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY): Let’s start with the fact that Hillary Clinton is constitutionally ineligible to serve as Secretary of State in the Obama administration. According to the Ineligibility Clause of the United States Constitution, no member of Congress can be appointed to an office that has benefited from a salary increase during the time that Senator or Representative served in Congress. A January 2008 Executive Order signed by President Bush during Hillary Clinton’s Senate term increased the salary for Secretary of State, thereby rendering Senator Clinton ineligible for the position. (Congressional “fixes” do not address the constitutional issue. Her appointment would be in violation of the U.S. Constitution.) And then, of course, there is the long history of corrupt behavior that follows Hillary wherever she goes, including Chinagate, Filegate, pardons for terrorists, pardons for cash (for her brothers), White House fundraising coffees, Whitewater, Travelgate lies, doing business with the State of Arkansas while her husband was governor, Web Hubbell, smear campaigns, false financial disclosure forms, John Huang, Chinese generals, the Lippo Group, paid sleepovers in the Lincoln Bedroom, cattle futures fraud, and stealing White House furniture. (This corruption is still going strong. In 2008, Hillary also received an illegal foreign campaign contribution in the form of a fundraising concert by music icon Elton John.)

Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT): Question: Which member of the U.S. Senate took the most campaign money from corrupt institutions Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? Answer: Chris Dodd, Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. Given this fact there is little reason to wonder why Senator Dodd blocked reform proposals for Fannie and Freddie, calling them “ill advised.” Dodd’s willingness to protect Fannie and Freddie would alone merit a spot on the “ten most corrupt list,” but there is much more. Dodd was also nabbed for accepting preferential treatment and loan terms from Countrywide Financial. The Connecticut Senator admitted earlier this year that he was told in 2003 when he refinanced two properties that he was being placed in Countrywide’s “VIP Program,” but said he believed this was simply a courtesy that had nothing to do with his position in the U.S. Senate. This is either a blatant lie or horribly naïve for a man who has served in the Senate for more than 25 years and currently chairs the Senate Banking Committee that regulates the mortgage industry. We’re not buying it.

Obama Advisor Valerie Jarrett (D-IL): CBS News once called Chicago politician Valerie Jarrett “the other side of Barack Obama’s brain.” Residents of a housing project in Chicago simply know her as “slumlord.” Jarrett is the former manager of Grove Parc Plaza, a controversial low-income housing project located in Obama’s former state senate district. According to the Boston Globe, the housing complex was considered “uninhabitable by unfixed problems, such as collapsed roofs and fire damage… In 2006, federal inspectors graded the condition of the complex an 11 on a 100-point scale - a score so bad the buildings now face demolition.” According to documents uncovered by Judicial Watch, Jarrett is also linked to a series of other shady real estate scandals involving convicted felon and former Obama fundraiser Antoin “Tony” Rezko. Jarrett has also been caught up in the Blagojevich scandal as Obama’s Candidate #1 for his senate seat. Most of Blagojevich’s corrupt negotiations with the Obama team centered on the possible Jarrett appointment. She remains mum on the scandal.

Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA): Rep. Lewis may share a name with a world-renowned comedian, but there’s nothing funny about his addiction to influence peddling and earmarking. Lewis, the senior Republican on the House Appropriations Committee, is under investigation for approving hundreds of millions of dollars in federal projects to benefit clients of one of his best friends, lobbyist and former Congressman Bill Lowery. According to press reports, Lowery, partners in his company and their clients donated approximately 37% of the funds collected by Lewis’ campaign PAC over a six-year period (an estimated $480,000) in return. Lowery has benefited handsomely from his relationship to Lewis. His company more than tripled its income between 1998 and 2004 with help from Lewis, while increasing its client base from 21 clients to 101 over that same time period. Despite these allegations, Lewis maintains his high-ranking position on the House Appropriations Committee.

President Barack Obama (D-IL): As Barack Obama assumes the presidency he already brings to the White House a large amount of ethical baggage. Obama’s presidential campaign had some of the ethical trimmings of a Chicago ward election. It was marked with enormous corruption issues, ranging from its alliance with the sleazy ACORN operation’s “voter registration” and “get out the vote” efforts to its acceptance of untraceable, and in too many cases, illegal online contributions. There are also Obama’s corrupt dealings with convicted felon Tony Rezko and unrepentant terrorist William Ayers, his below-market rate mortgage loans, his stock dealings and related “earmark” votes in the U.S. Senate, and his missing or non-existent official papers from his years in the Illinois State Senate. His ongoing cover up of his and his team’s role in the Blagojevich “pay-to-play” scandal is ruining his presidency even before he took the oath of office. In 2007, more reports surfaced of deeper and suspicious business and political connections It was reported that just two months after he joined the Senate, Obama purchased $50,000 worth of stock in speculative companies whose major investors were his biggest campaign contributors. One of the companies was a biotech concern that benefited from legislation Obama pushed just two weeks after the senator purchased $5,000 of the company’s shares. Obama was also nabbed conducting campaign business in his Senate office, a violation of federal law.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA): Last year House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made the “most corrupt” list for sneaking a $25 million earmark for her husband into a $15 billion Water Resources Development Act passed by Congress. This year, Pelosi ran afoul of federal election law by participating in an illegal advertising campaign funded by Al Gore’s non-profit Alliance for Climate protection. The advertisement featuring Pelosi ran at least 300 times nationally, including in the House speaker’s district, during campaign season, representing an illegal in-kind contribution to her campaign. Perhaps more disturbing than this incident, however, is the fact that Speaker Pelosi has allowed corruption to run rampant in Congress and has ignored serious incidents of crooked behavior within her own party. Pelosi promised a new era of ethics enforcement during the 2006 campaign and she has failed to deliver. Instead, she continues to protect the worst of the worst of political corruption in the House of Representatives. Under Pelosi’s
leadership, the House ethics process remains essentially shut down – which protects members in both parties from accountability.

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY): Rep. Charles Rangel, Chairman of the powerful Ways and Means Committee, took the unusual step of filing an ethics complaint against himself in 2008 related to scandals involving unpaid taxes and rent-controlled apartments. This act was clearly a publicity stunt, but regardless, the House Ethics Committee took the New York congressman up on his request, and even took things a step further by expanding the scope of its investigation. The initial transgressions that led to the ethics panel probe involve: Rangel’s failure to pay taxes on $75,000 in rental income he earned from his off-shore rental property; his efforts to use his influence to keep hold of highly coveted rent-controlled apartments in Harlem; and misusing his congressional office to fundraise for his private Rangel Center. Now Congress is looking into whether or not Rangel preserved a tax loophole for an oil drilling company in exchange for funding for the Rangel Center as well.

Former Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ): Three-term Republican congressman Rick Renzi was indicted by a federal grand jury in 2008 for conspiracy, extortion, money laundering and wire fraud. He allegedly used his influence on a House Natural Resources Committee to orchestrate a land swap with the federal government that financially benefited himself and his associates. The 49-year-old lawmaker, who owns an insurance business, is also charged with embezzling more than $400,000 from insurance clients to fund his congressional campaign. A 26-page federal indictment lays out how the legislator and his business associates conspired to obtain federal government land by swapping land they owned together because the coveted public land sits above underground copper deposits. The indictment says that the congressman concealed nearly $1 million that he made for using his influence to seal the land deals. No wonder Renzi decided to retire this year.

Former Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK): “Uncle Ted” Stevens, the face of Alaska politics for 40 years and formerly the longest serving Republican in the U.S. Senate, was narrowly defeated in his campaign for re-election in November. But that’s the least of his problems. Just days before the November election, Stevens was convicted on seven felony counts for accepting illegal gifts and then lying about it. The establishment of both political parties came to Stevens’ defense, including former Secretary of State Colin Powell and Democratic Senator Daniel Inouye, but to no avail. The jury found Stevens guilty on all counts. And now Stevens faces the possibility of a 35-year prison sentence.

Rep. Don Young (R-AK): Carrying on Alaska’s legacy of corruption, Rep. Don Young is also the subject of an influence peddling investigation. (You may recall it was Young who attempted to push through the $200 million “Bridge to Nowhere” boondoggle.) Well the Justice Department is also investigating the 18-term congressman for his corrupt ties to an oil services company, VECO, ironically the same company that furnished illegal gifts to Senator Ted Stevens. VECO allegedly used golf tournaments and pig roasts to illegally funnel cash to Young, which the 18-term congressman then failed to report on his financial disclosure forms. VECO Vice President Rick Smith has already pleaded guilty to bribing lawmakers to support oil-friendly legislation. The Alaska Republican also added a $10 million earmark for the construction of short stretch of road in Florida that benefited a wealthy campaign contributor. Real estate developer, Daniel Aronoff, had raised $40,000 for Young shortly before the earmark was inserted.

World Recession An Excuse for federal government to seize all 401k’s, private pension fund and private property

It started with subprime mortgage borrowers, moved on to banks and has now progressed to whole countries. Iceland has already thrown in the towel, and Argentina stole its citizens’ pensions. Socialized bailouts and government controls are now the watchword in Washington as well.

Already governments in the U.S., Britain, and Europe are mightily meddling in the markets under the guise of “saving the system”, by taking ownership stakes in banks that rank above the rights of existing bank owners, then telling these banks how much to lend and what they must do with the cash. The same for auto and insurance companies. All is part of a global master plan to rob the people of their private savings, insurance, pensions and property.

When the Taliban and other Afghan groups were formed to fight the Soviet Union war and occupation of Afghanistan US President Reagan (Vice President George H. W. Bush and 16th Deputy Director of Central Intelligence Robert Gates) called them freedom fighters and welcomed them to the US White House. Now that the US is the aggressors and the ones occupying Afghanistan under military force the U,S Canada and other NATO countries calls those same freedom fighters terrorists and al Qaeda.

You would have to be pretty stupid to not see who the victims are in the US attack and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. That is exactly what everyone in the US, Canada, England, France and other allies of the US are - unbelievably stupid. You are stupid because you cannot see the wrong that the US has done to the people of Afghanistan and Iraq. Do the math stupid. How many Iraqis took part in the hijackings of September 11, 2001? The correct answer is 0. How many Afghanistan citizens took part in the hijackings of 9/11? The correct answer is 0. How many foreign military war planes were used in the attacks of September 11, 2001? The correct answer is 0. What is the nationality of the accused mastermind of 9/11? The correct answer is Saudi Arabia. How many hijackers were from Saudi Arabia? The correct answer is fifteen of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon. Did the US attack the country that had the mastermind and the majority of hijackers that took part in attacks of September 11, 2001? The correct answer is no. The evidence is overwhelming that Saudi Arabia was the country that planned for and executed the attacks because a member of the Saudi royal family was the mastermind of the attacks and the majority of the hijackers were Saudi and Valerie Plame traced the financing of the 9/11 attacks to the Saudis yet the US went and attacked and now occupy 2 countries that had no part whatsoever in the attacks against the US.

You are all stupid for believing that the Afghan and Iraqi people are terrorists for attacking the US troops who have attacked their country, destroyed their homes and businesses and slaughtered their people. You are stupid for allowing your government to inhumanly torture innocent people whose only crime is defending their country and fellow countrymen from the unlawful war of aggression and occupation of their country. No matter where you go in the World each country has the same duty to protect their country and people from an armed attack from a foreign country. Each and every country have the exact same military code of conduct that bounds their citizens to the duty to defend themselves at all costs, including giving up your life in resistance to an attack and occupation. The United States Army Code of Conduct is duplicated around the World. Read the United States Code of Conduct and substitute the United States with countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Russia, China, Canada or any other country. The duty to fight and guard ones country and way of life is the same in every country in the World. Duty bound to not surrender, to fight on until you are dead, to command others to fight and resist, to be silent when captured is universal because you do so to defend your freedom and your right for you and your countrymen to be free from unlawful attacks and occupations by a foreign military force. The Afghan and Iraqi people are duty bound and have every legal right to defend themselves and their country from the unlawful US attack and occupation of their country. They are not terrorists or the enemy - the US, Canada and other participating NATO countries are the terrorists and the enemy.

If Canada, England or France was attacked by a foreign country, the people of those countries would immediately organize a resistance movement to drive out the attacking military forces. Resistance is the logical and most patriotic duty and action that any citizen can take up when faced with a foreign military occupation of their country. Those who resist attacks and occupation are the ultimate heroes. Taking up arms to defend your country and fellow countrymen is courageous and honorable. Iraqi and Afghanistan citizens are not terrorists they are their country’s heroes - defending their country and countrymen from the unlawful US attacks and occupation. US propaganda labels the resistance as terrorists. US propaganda is used because if the US people realized that the Iraqi and Afghan people are the innocent victims of the Bush administration greed for oil the US would not be in either Iraq or Afghanistan. The US people don’t realize that it is solely the blame of the Bush administration and the Obama administration for the inevitable collapse of the US. The unlawful, unprovoked and unjustified wars of aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan is bankrupting the US.

John McCain: “… after we were able to help the Afghan freedom fighters and drive the Russians out of Afghanistan, we basically washed our hands of the region. Those “freedom fighters” were of course the mujaheddin in Afghanistan waging jihad against the Soviets, including one Osama bin Laden and one Zayman Al Zawahiri. We backed and funded them … we certainly supported the factions fighting alongside him, factions every bit as militantly Islamic as bin Laden–as even the State Department concedes.”


Canada’s biggest bank, RBC said its first-quarter profits fell to $1.05 billion, down 15 per cent from the previous year’s $1.25 billion but above levels expected by most analysts. The Royal said its adjusted cash earnings per share amounted to $1.18, well above a consensus forecast for 94 cents according to Thomson Reuters. Total revenue rose to $6.94 billion from $5.65 billion in the prior-year period. The bank left its quarterly dividend unchanged at 50 cents per share.

Canadian banks have so far vastly outperformed their American counterparts. In Canada, the banks are in better shape and are looked at with envy by rivals in other parts of the world.

At the Royal annual, Royal Bank of Canada CEO Gord Nixon said the Canadian financial system has “stood out” internationally as being well structured and well managed, citing a World Economic Forum ranking. Last week, U.S. President Barack Obama touted Canada’s banks as providing “a strong model” for U.S. banks to follow.

Nixon said that, despite some reports, “lending activity at Canada’s banks did not contract in 2008.”

He said credit spreads have increased but that its loan book grew by 13 per cent during the year and that loans to individuals increased 2.3 per cent in the first quarter.

“There is no question we are having conversations with clients that are markedly different from the ones we had a couple years ago,” Nixon said.

Scotiabank recorded first quarter net income of $842 million, up $7 million or 1% from the same period last year. Diluted earnings per share (EPS) were $0.80 compared to $0.82 in the same period a year earlier. Return on equity was 16.9% compared to 18.3% last year. “All three of our business lines delivered revenue growth through increases in volumes, net interest and other income. The business lines benefitted from broadly diversified revenues and a strong focus on risk and expense management,” said President and CEO Rick Waugh.

“Canadian Banking continues to perform well in a competitive market. This quarter’s results benefitted from loan growth in mortgages and business lending. Growth in total personal deposits from business initiatives and acquisitions led to year-over-year gains in market share”

“Results in International Banking reflect strong deposit and loan growth in all regions, ongoing contributions from acquisitions - particularly in Peru and Chile - and the positive impact of foreign currency translation. The positive revenue growth was offset by increases in retail credit provisions in Latin America.

“Scotia Capital had record performances in its precious metals, fixed income and investment banking businesses. The division also benefitted from robust contributions from foreign exchange, higher loan growth and lending revenues and low loan losses.

“Our loan portfolios both in Canada and internationally are all performing within our planned risk tolerances and targets.

“Most importantly, Scotiabank’s capital position not only remained strong but improved over previous periods. In addition, our capital is of a high quality relative to our global peers.


The evidence is clear. The US attacked 2 countries which did not attack the US or any other country or even threaten other countries in any way. The US attacks against Afghanistan and Iraq are declared “Wars of Aggression”, Crimes Against Peace” and “war Crimes” according to US and International Law. The accounting declares George W Bush, Dick Cheney, Tony Blair, Donald Rumsfeld and members of their government as war criminals.

“Aggression is the use of armed force by a state against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this definition,” according to General Assembly Resolution 3314

Associate United States Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson was the chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg Tribunal. In his report to the State Department, Justice Jackson wrote: “No political or economic situation can justify” the crime of aggression. He also said: “If certain acts in violation of treaties are crimes they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.”

Since September 11, 2001

Middle East attacks against US = 0
Number of US civilians killed by Iraqi military = 0
Number of US civilians killed by Afghan military = 0
Number of US civilians killed by the Taliban = 0
Number of US civilians killed by Saddam Hussein = 0
Number of US civilians killed by Iran = 0
Number of Iraqi bombers used in 9/11 attacks = 0
Number of Afghan bombers used in 9/11 attacks = 0
Number of US citizens killed by bin Laden on 9/11 = 0 - When the US FBI was asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Number of US citizens killed on 9/11 by al Qaeda = 0

Number of Iraqi civilians killed by US = 1,000,000 +

Number of US citizens killed by Bush / Cheney and their administration on 9/11 = 3000+

Number of US Soldiers killed since 9/11 by Bush / Cheney and their administration = 4000+

Number of US cruise missiles used in the 9/11 attacks = 2 - Pentagon and highway traffic CCTV videos confirms air traffic controller reports of a military jet or jet powered cruise missile slamming into the Pentagon 2nd explodes into a field near the town of Shanksville in rural Somerset County, Pennsylvania

Air-traffic controllers from the Washington, DC sector originally said the incoming plane was a military jet according to reports; but no grand jury has called them to testify and they have been strangely gagged from speaking out. One air traffic controller from another Northeast sector revealed to a 9-11 widow that FBI threats were made of both a personal and career nature: “You are ordered never to speak about what you saw on your screen during the attacks; and if you do, things will not go well for you and your family.”

Number of US Air Force Modified Boeing 707 Aerial refueling planes used in 9/11 attacks = 2 flown by remote control like the Predator unmanned aerial vehicle now being used in Iraq. WTC 1 and WTC 2 were the targets of these US military planes. The US government attacked its own country on September 11, 2001 in order to begin the Bush administration’s war of terror against the freedom of the US and the World.

Only country threatening and planning to drop nuclear bombs on another = US - Dick Cheney pressured Bush to order dropping nuclear bomb on Iran before term ends. Dick Cheney declared in February 2009 warning a US nuclear attack is imminent!

The only country to drop nuclear bobmbs on civilian cities - the US. Dropped even though Japan was already negotiating a surrender to end the war. On Aug. 6, 1945, and again on August 9, the U.S. government dropped the first and second atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Tens of thousands of people died instantly, with thousands more dying later.

The country that has and is still violating international law by authorizing the use of torture on ordinary civilians and POWs - The US authorized during meetings in the White House Situation Room in the years immediately following the Sept. 11 attacks. War criminals in attendance were Cheney, then-Bush aides Attorney General John Ashcroft, Secretary of State Colin Powell, CIA Director George Tenet and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice.

Number one piece of evidence against the Bush administration for the pre-9/11 planning for unprovoked wars of aggression against 7 countries: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan & Iran. - “Rebuilding America Defenses” - Written in part by former United States Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfwitz and advocating the redeployment of U.S. troops in permanent bases in strategic locations throughout the world where they can be ready to act to protect U.S. interests abroad including the takeover of the Midle East oil.

Operation name for the Bush administration’s FAKE TERROR ATTACKS against their own country on September 11, 2001 where they killed more than 3000 US citizens as a pretext for global war - “Operation Northwoods”

9/11 Commission testimony that gives evidence that vice-president Dick Cheney is guilty of treason for ordering the US Air Force and Pentagon Missile Defense system to stand down - aiding and abetting an attack on the US. Then US Secretary of Transportation, Norman Mineta, testifies that Dick Cheney was operationally aware of a US AGM-86C Conventional Air-Launched Cruise Missile, transmitting flight 77’s transponder signal, as it approached the Pentagon and ordered the US military not to interfere or stop the incoming attack.

The Bush administration commited the largest heist in US history of US funds on September 10, 2001 and then used the fake terrorist attacks on the following day to hide their crime. Then Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced that the Pentagon lost $2.3 Trillion and the next day the US used a cruise missile to destroy the accounting offices of the Pentagon. The US AGM-86C Conventional Air-Launched Cruise Missile (CALCM) hit the exact spot where Pentagon staff where investigating the theft.

CRUDE OIL PRICES in September 2001 was $20.82
CRUDE OIL PRICES last year of Bush administration was $130 +

Today the US National debt has passed $10.85 Trillion
As of April 2008, the total U.S. federal debt is approximately $9.5 trillion
November 2000, U.S. federal debt was approximately $5.674 trillion

The criminal events (not an act of war as there was no foreign country, neither its leadership or military, which took part in the criminal acts against the US) of New York 11 September 20001, and the criminal event of Madrid on 11 March 2004, and other criminal events commonly connected to Islam, are clearly not related to Islam if we consider that the Al-Qaeda was established by the C.I.A in the 1980s (Under the president Ronald Reagan / vice-president George Hw Bush administration). Al-Qaeda is a made in the USA “Islamic” front which enables the C.I.A. to commit crimes against humanity in the name of Muslims. The Mujahadeen of Afghanistan were organized, trained and funded by the C.I.A. (Hamid Karzai) using the Pakistani ISI as a “cut-out” in order to lure the Soviet Army into Afghanistan at the end of 1979. The Mujahedeen can be seen as C.I.A. terrorism with an islamic name and “islamic” perpetrators. Afghanistan has, for all purposes, been destroyed by these fanatics in furtherance of American interests.

The CIA’s Al-Qaeda terror organization has caused immense damage to Islam, to Moslems worldwide and to the interests of the peoples of all Arab and Muslim countries. The actions of the CIA’s Al-Qaeda have only served to promote the interests of the U.S. (the official purpose of the CIA) and Israel, which are clearly interested in “reshaping” the Middle East in such a way that they can more easily rape and plunder the region at will.

The C.I.A is using the terrorist actions of its proxy Al-Qaeda in order to give the U.S. an excuse to extend their power into and invade the Arab countries rich in oil like Iraq, Iran, and Saudia Arabia. The C.I.A. is using its proxy Al-Qaeda to engender fear and hate of Islam and Muslims worldwide. This corresponds to an old and tried ploy of colonizers: to slander and denigrate the target population so that it is acceptable and even called for to commit genocide against them.

US soldier on guard protecting the US stolen oil in Iraq while back home the United States is burning up with a $11 trillion national debt fueled by out-of-control government spending

In mid-2003 Iran broke from tradition and began accepting eurodollars as payment for its oil exports from its E.U. and Asian customers. Saddam Hussein attempted a similar bold step back in 2000 and was met with a devastating reaction from the U.S. Economic reasons had more to do with U.S. attacking Iraq than concerns over any weapons of mass destruction. Now under US military occupation Iraq now has no choice about using U.S. dollars for oil sales. However, Iraq’s plan to open an international oil exchange market for trading oil in the euro currency is a much larger threat to U.S. dollar supremacy than Iraq’s switch to euros.

In 2006 Iran intended to set up an oil exchange that would facilitate global trading of oil between industrialized and developing countries by pricing sales in the euro, or “petroeuro.” To this end, they are creating a euro-denominated Internet-based oil exchange system for global oil sales. This is a direct challenge to U.S. dollar supremacy in the global oil market. It is widely accepted that the U.S. dollar has been inflated for some time now because of the US monopoly of “petrodollars” in oil trades. With the level of national debt, the value of the dollar has been held artificially high compared to other currencies.

The vast majority of the world’s oil is traded on the New York NYMEX (Mercantile Exchange) and the London IPE (International Petroleum Exchange), and both exchanges are owned by U.S. corporations. Both of these oil exchanges transact oil trades in U.S. currency. Iran’s plan to create a new oil exchange would facilitate trading oil on the world market in euros. The euro has become a somewhat stronger and more stable trading medium than the U.S. dollar in recent years. Perhaps this is why Russia, Venezuela, and some members of OPEC have expressed interest in moving towards a petroeuro system for oil transactions. Without a doubt, a successful Iranian oil exchange may create momentum for other industrialized countries to stop exchanging their own currencies for petrodollars in order to buy oil. A shift away from U.S. dollars to euros in the oil market would cause the demand for petrodollars to drop, perhaps causing the value of the dollar to plummet. A precipitous drop in the value of the U.S. dollar would undermine the U.S. position as a world economic leader.

China is a major exporter to the United States, and its trade surplus with the U.S. means that China has become the world’s second largest holder of U.S. currency reserves (Japan is the largest holder with $800 billion, and China holds over $600 billion in T-bills). China would lose enormously if they were still holding vast amounts of U.S. currency when the dollar collapsed and assumed a more realistic value. Maintaining the U.S. as a market for their goods is a pre-eminent goal of Chinese financial policy, but they are increasingly dependent on Iran for their vital oil and gas imports. The Chinese government is careful to maintain the value of the yuan linked with the U.S. dollar (8.28 yuan to 1 dollar). This artificial linking makes them, effectively, one currency. But the Chinese government has indicated interest in de-linking the dollar-yuan arrangement, which could result in an immediate fall in the dollar. More worrisome is the potentiality of China to abandon its ongoing prolific purchase of U.S. Treasuries/debt-should they become displeased with U.S. policies towards Iran.

It is reasonable to expect that the Chinese are hedging their bets. It is unreasonable to expect that they plan to be left holding devalued US dollars after a sudden decline in their value. It is possible that the artificial situation could continue for some time, but this will be due largely to the fact that the Chinese want it that way. Regardless, China seems to be in the process of unloading vast sums of its U.S. dollar reserves in the world market to purchase oil reserves, and most recently attempted to buy Unocal, a California-based oil company.

The irony is that apparent U.S. plans to invade Iran put pressure on the Chinese to abandon their support of the dollar. A unilateral U.S. military strike on Iran would further isolate the U.S. government, and it is conceivable that such an overt action could provoke other industrialized nations to abandon the dollar en masse. Perhaps the U.S. planners think that they can corner the market in oil militarily. But a U.S. intervention in Iran is likely to prove disastrous for the United States, making matters much worse regarding international terrorism, not to mention potential adverse effects on the U.S. economy. The more likely outcome of an Iran invasion would be that, just as in Iraq, Iranian oil exports would dry up, regardless of what currency they are denominated in, and China would be compelled to abandon the dollar and buy oil from Russia-likely in euros. The conclusion is that U.S. leaders seem to have no idea what they are doing. Clark points out that, “World oil production is now flat out, and a major interruption would escalate oil prices to a level that would set off a global depression.”

Foreign ownership of the US - The US Is No Longer A Superpowe

A traditional defense of the national debt is that Americans “owe the debt to themselves”, but that is becoming increasingly less accurate. The US debt in the hands of foreign governments was 25% of the total in 2007, virtually double the 1988 figure of 13%. Despite the declining willingness of foreign investors to continue investing in US dollar denominated instruments as the US dollar fell in 2007, the U.S. Treasury statistics indicate that, at the end of 2006, foreigners held 44% of federal debt held by the public. About 66% of that 44% was held by the central banks of other countries, in particular the central banks of Japan and China. In total, lenders from Japan and China held 47% of the foreign-owned debt. This exposure to potential financial or political risk should foreign banks stop buying Treasury securities or start selling them heavily was addressed in a recent report issued by the Bank of International Settlements which stated, “‘Foreign investors in U.S. dollar assets have seen big losses measured in dollars, and still bigger ones measured in their own currency. While unlikely, indeed highly improbable for public sector investors, a sudden rush for the exits cannot be ruled out completely.”

“The U.S. will lose its status as the superpower of the global financial system, not abruptly but it will erode,” Finance Minister Peer Steinbrueck told the lower house of Germany’s parliament in Berlin, according to published reports. “The global financial system will become more multi-polar.”

Steinbrueck criticized the United States for failing to adequately regulate investment banks and said free-market policies embraced by the United States and Great Britain that emphasized a short-term “insane drive for higher and higher profits” were partly to blame for the crisis.

“Wall Street will never be what it was,” he said.

The finance minister said he would push for a global ban on speculative short selling and would use next month’s meeting of the Group of Seven finance ministers and central bankers in Washington to press for new rules that would prevent banks from fully securitizing loans and selling them to third parties.

All 50 states in the U.S. have to balance their budget. If a state does not take in enough money in taxes, they have to layoff workers, stop building roads, etc. The U. S. govt., however, does not have to balance the budget, and that is why the US has a national debt of over 11 TRILLION dollars.

Oddly enough, Pres Reagan and the two Bushes, father and son, have run up 7.2 TRILLION of the 11 TRILLION debt in the 20 years they held the presidency. You can not spend more than you take in and still give a tax break to the very wealthy. It is the Republicans who spend money like “drunken sailors.”


Technology News - Do you have a vehicle that performs poorly? With the FuelReducer hp you get better performance and better fuel efficiency. Immediate better response. Independent and consumer tests show that the FuelReducer hp allows you to accelerate quicker. Vehicles that lack power now have a new life just by installing a FuelReducer hp. Whether you own a Mustang GT or minivan the FuelReducer hp can enhance performance and reduce fuel consumption at the same time. Customers are claiming that after installing a FuelReducer hp they can accelerate so quickly that they can now burn rubber. They are very pleased with the better throttle response. One customer with a 2004 Mustang GT V8 says the FuelReducer hp works awesome. All are stating a noticeably better throttle response.

The Canadian owned and operated company FuelReducer has developed and is now selling other fuel reducing devices that have proven fuel reduction results. The FuelReducer Pro is made for cars and trucks with either 3/8” or 5/16” metal fuel lines and it has added 2 to 8 mpg to the fuel efficiency of the vehicles they have been installed on. They reduce the demand for fuel by 10 to 45%. The FuelReducer Oi is for oil heating furnaces and it can save as much as 25% on your oil heating fuel bill.

Dozens of independent and consumer tests have been performed with the FuelReducer and they confirm that the FuelReducer does work. The results proves that the FuelReducer is not a scam. The tests were done using one or all of the following methods:

1) Driving the vehicle for a month without a FuelReducer and recording the mileage and fuel consumption for that period. After one month elapsed a FuelReducer was installed and the vehicle was again driven for a month and the mileage and fuel consumption was recorded. After the month elapsed the numbers were compared and the results showed a clear fuel efficiency increase of as much as 8 mpg.

2) The test vehicles were hooked up to laptop with a state-of-the-art engine diagnostic program and were driven for an hour. During the hour of driving the mileage, RPM, air fuel mixture, O2 readings and fuel efficiency were stored by the program in a log file. The vehicles then had a FuelReducer installed and driven again on the exact same route as the previous test and for the same distance. During the second road test the mileage, RPM, air fuel mixture, O2 readings and fuel efficiency were again stored by the program in another log file. Comparing the 2 test results log files again showed a clear fuel efficiency increase. The test also showed better response and acceleration with a FuelReducer installed.

3) The tests vehicles with a factory installed on board computer display of the fuel mileage for the vehicle was noted and recorded without a FuelReducer. In town and highway fuel efficiencies were recorded before a FuelReducer was installed. A FuelReducer was then installed and the vehicles were once again driven in town and the fuel efficiency recorded from the vehicles’ factory installed on board computer display. The same vehicles were then highway driven and the fuel efficiency recorded from the vehicles’ factory installed on board computer display. The vehicles’ on board computer displays also showed a clear fuel efficiency increase.

4) The FuelReducer Oi for oil heating furnaces, was tested in several private homes and in a 20 unit apartment building. The home tests reported that they saved from 190 to 221 liters of oil. The test for the 20 unit apartment building was carried out by a heating service technician. The service technician reports that the FuelReducer Oi saved as much as 25% on oil heating fuel. There was no negative effects reported. No heating of the oil or pump and no added stress to the pump.

What are you waiting for? Better response, better performance and better fuel efficiency all rolled up in the FuelReducer hp. Lowering your home oil heating bill by as much as 25% with the FuelReducer Oi. Adding up to 8 mpg to the fuel efficiency of your vehicles with the FuelReducer Pro. FuelReducer has a product for everyone.


Thanks to Barack Obama the rich banker’s bad assets have been wiped clean. Obama used your tax dollars as toilet paper to clean up the bankers mess knowing that the bankers’ “toxic assets” were worthless. What do you do with paper that has been used to clean up a mess? Do you hold onto it or do you throw it away? Those bad debts are worthless for a reason. No one wanted them. No one saw any value in them. No one was stupid enough to buy those worthless “toxic” assets - no one but Barack Obama.

We can all safely assume that Obama was never good at mathematics. We can also safely assume that Barack Obama doesn’t have any clue about the value of money. We can also assume that Obama will buy just about anything - why not its not his money. When Obama became president of the United States he saw the US treasury as his own personal bank vault. If you haven’t noticed he is acting like a child set loose in a candy store. Obama is a child who has taken over the US White House. What spoiled Obama wants, spoiled Obama gets. Obama’s solution to everything is to throw money at it instead of fixing the problem by eliminating the problem - the US government’s uncontrolled spending.

The sheer velocity of Obama’s spending proposals began to overwhelm even experienced Washington hands. In the span of four days, we saw the signing of the $787 billion stimulus bill, the rollout of a $275 billion housing proposal, discussion of Congress’s remaining appropriations bills (about $400 billion) and word of a vaguely-defined financial stabilization plan that could ultimately cost $2 trillion.

“We thought the Bush deficits were big at the time,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. “But this is going to make the previous administration look like rank amateurs. We could be adding multiple trillions to the national debt in the first year.”

The numbers are so dizzying that McConnell and his fellow Republicans are trying to “connect the dots” — that is, to explain to the public how all of those discrete spending initiatives add up to a previously unthinkable total. Obama’s current spending proposals, Republicans point out, will cost more than the United States spent on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the general war on terror and Hurricane Katrina in the last seven years. And that’s before you throw in the $2 trillion fiscal stabilization plan.

The only solution to slow down the out-of-control debt in the US and to heal, is to STOP SPENDING money the US government doesn’t have. The crisis keeps on getting bigger only because the US government keeps on adding to the US national debt with useless stimulus plans. Obama is throwing more fuel on the fire by adding $trillion government packages. The banks can recover without the money from the US taxpayers. They have nearly a $trillion each in company assets that they can liquidate and pay off their entire debt. They can eliminate the debt causing schemes. They can allow their mortgage holders to refinance their mortgages to a more affordable payment plan. The banks never needed bailouts from the US government. Their debts are just a fraction of their net worth. Bank of America declared a debt of $2 billion yet got $20 billion from the Obama government to wipe out a $2 billion debt. Money is being wasted by the Obama government. If Bank of America had a debt of $2 billion and they declared they needed government bailout then Obama should have made sure that they only got $2 billion in government aid and not 10 times or $20 billion in aid. Obama has to immediately stop spending. He has to trim the fiscal budget of all the pork fat. He has to lead the US responsibly not recklessly. He has to end the wars and bring the US troops home so that the nation can heal. It costs a lot more to have troops stationed overseas than it does to have them back home with their families. He has to stop interfering in the commerce of America. The American people create jobs, not government. Government create a tax burden when they create jobs. Government money can only come from the people through taxes. When Obama signs huge stimulus bills he is only increasing the tax burden of the US people and the national debt. Money to build Obama roads and bridges doesn’t come Obama’s pocket it comes from the pockets of every working United States citizen. Obama don’t be stupid. Be a leader. Stop your reckless spending - your hurting the US people and your destroying the US economy.

Article written by PAUL W KINCAID Brampton Ontario Canada

In August 1957, one Canadian dollar was worth over US$1.06. On November 7, 2007, the Canadian dollar was briefly worth over US$1.10

With uncontrolled stimulus spending the U.S. collapse is inevitable. The United States faces a Zimbabwe-style economic collapse if it keeps “spending a bunch of money we don’t have,” South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford declared. “What you’re doing is buying into the notion that if we just print some more money that we don’t have and send it to different states, we’ll create jobs,” he said. “If that’s the case, why isn’t Zimbabwe a rich place?” Scholars are predicting that US President Barack Obama will order martial law this year. At the current rate of spending by the US government there is a high probability that the collapse of the United States will occur by 2010. Obama is asking US Congress to give him an unprecidended $3.6 trillion budget plan on the heals of President Obama signing the $787 billion economic stimulus package into law Feb 2009. Contrary to what the US government is trying do by dragging the global economy down with them the collapse of the US is not the end of the world, simply the end of a US.

When the Soviet Union collapsed it did not affect the rest of the World, then why is everyone assuming that the US financial crisis will result in a Global economic collapse? The US dollar is not the only currency in the World. Countries around the World trade with other countries without using the US dollar at all. When Canada trades with foreign states they don’t always trade with the US dollar. The trading nation usually accepts Canadian dollars as legal tender for trade. When the EU nations trade with non-EU countries they don’t even use the US dollar, they trade using the Euro.

Only the Soviet Union collapsed so wouldn’t it make sense that only the US would collapse. The answer is yes. The problem is the US is selling it as a global crisis. Their crisis is the results of the mismanagement and misappropriation of federal money through the crimes of the Bush administration that includes unwarranted, unjustified and illegal wars (the root of the US crisis) and money laundering of the people’s money through their bailout (bonus) schemes.

The slide in major stock indexes, the decline in U.S. gross domestic product and Washington’s bailout of banking giants are evidence that American dominance of global markets has collapsed. The US dollar benefits as the reserve currency because of political safety and vast liquid markets relative to other markets, made so by Bretton Woods when it was chosen as the reserve currency. Note it was backed by gold when it was first chosen as the reserve currency. Now it’s backed by… the capacity of the U.S. taxpayer to fund government expenditures. Countries like China are now calling for an alternative currency to take over as the reserve currency. Some are suggesting a Global currency to replace all currencies. If that were to be allowed the advocates of a New World Order would have won another battle in their quest for global domination. There are enough strong currencies available already in the World to fill in for the collapse of the US dollar that we, as sovereign nations, do not need a Global currency. The EU experiment is the perfect example of what will happen if we give up our sovereignty in favor of a corporate (fascist) union of states. Leading Nazis and Fascists were prominent in the founding of the EU - European Common Market, the principles of which were clearly laid out in the work of Hitler’s Economics Minister Walter Funk in 1942 - The European Economic Community.

In the foreign exchange market and international finance the US dollar is not the only currency. Case in point, in September 2007 the Canadian dollar rose very quickly to parity with the US dollar and even for a time was worth more than the US dollar. What made the Canadian currency climb then stop around parity after a brief material breach? Renewed foreign investment demand into Canada. Money market funds seeking diversification out of the U.S. dollar, allocating some to Canada. If the US dollar does collapse the Canadian dollar (already proven as an accepted alternative to the US dollar when foreign investment and money market funds pushed the Canadian dollar past parity with the US) , the Euro (has strong international presence backed by strong economies of their member countries), the Yen (the third most traded currency in the world, though some would argue that it is the most traded), the Franc (considered a very stable currency but lacks the liquidity of the Euro) will all be used in trade and international financing.

Unless people in the US put an end to their government’s uncontrolled stimulus spending Obama’s $3.6 trillion fiscal budget will break the Treasury’s ability to obtain financing, destroying confidence in that all-important detail, confidence that my money is safe. If default is not opted for, but instead money is printed to fund this out-of-control debt, the ‘ole “inflate your way out of it” strategy, the dollar is diluted. Either way, the outcome is inevitable.

“indisputable evidence of the widespread use of white phosphorus” in crowded residential areas of Gaza City and elsewhere in the territory by Israel

Israel is preparing for all-out war on multiple fronts that include Iran, Syria and Lebanon, a senior military commander claims.
Israeli army Home Front Command Major General Yair Golan said Sunday that Tel Aviv is preparing for “all possible scenarios”, indicating that one such scenario would be to fight a simultaneous war against Iran, Syria and Lebanon.

The confirmation comes as US President Barack Obama seeks “new beginnings” with its arch-rival Iran. The US offer has been met with world praise but with fury in Tel Aviv.

Israeli media outlets late on Sunday began propagating wild scenarios that Iran is using the Lebanese Hezbollah to recruit Palestinian fighters to carry out terror attacks on Israel.

Israel has long accused Iran of arming Hezbollah and Palestinian groups via Syria, in an attempt to demonize the two Muslim countries.

Tel Aviv also accuses Tehran of developing nuclear weaponry — a charge denied by the UN nuclear watchdog.

At a conference held in Tel Aviv, Golan also confirmed the likeliness of Israel staging another military confrontation against Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

Although Israel does not consider rocket attacks from Gaza as a serious threat, there is the possibility of “dangerous” missile attacks by other countries, he said.

He failed to elaborate how such missile attacks would relate to Gaza.

His remarks came as reports claim that the soon-to-be Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has plans for “a major military conflict in the coming months.”

The commander also revealed that Tel Aviv will install new warning systems across Israel in preparation for its war plans.

The last Israeli-waged war on the Gaza Strip, which began on December 27, killed at least 1,350 Palestinians and wounded more than 5,450 others in the densely-populated sliver. In a report presented Monday at the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council, UN expert on the Palestinian territories Falk called for a probe to assess if the Israeli forces could differentiate between civilian and military targets in Gaza.

“If it is not possible to do so, then launching the attacks is inherently unlawful, and would seem to constitute a war crime of the greatest magnitude under international law,” Falk said in the report.

“On the basis of the preliminary evidence available, there is reason to reach this conclusion,” he added, pointing out that attacks were targeted at densely populated areas.

The aggression was the last in a series of operations carried out by the Israeli forces against the natives of the land since occupying Palestine in 1948.

The artitects of the Robbing Peter to pay Paul scheme - aka Ponzi scheme - Alan Greenspan, former Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke, current Federal Reserve Chairman and Henry (Hank) Paulson, former Treasury Secretary

If you are the majority of Americans who don’t know what is going on with the US economic crisis and US bankers giving themselves massively large bonuses from money given to them by Bush and Obama here is one explanation. Both the Bush and the Obama administrations have been asking you to fork over billions of you hard earned money (tax dollars) to US banks who have claimed they are in deep financial trouble and unless they get some money they will be bankrupt. Those banks who are declaring that they are in financial trouble are the banks that make the US money in the first place. They are shareholders in the US Federal Reserve. The US Federal Reserve is not part of the US government. They are a group of private banks (the exact same one getting $trillion bonuses from Bush and Obama) that print the US dollar and charges the US government high interest to use their printed money. Take a look at you US dollars. On the top it clearly states US Federal Reserve Note. That is their copyright to that dollar and the US government (specifically you the people) pay the alleged near bankrupt US Federal Reserve banks royalty fees to use the money they print.

One day these shareholders of the US Federal Reserve got really greedy and got together to hash out a plan to swindle as much as they could from you. Their scheme was devised so that you would unwittingly hand over to them your hard earned money that was deducted from your paychecks in the form of taxes. Their scheme was put into action simply by declaring that they had lost $billions in bad debts. No one has since even bother to audit them to verify such astronomical claimed losses. Just on their word both Bush and Obama have signed over $8.5 Trillion in bank bonuses. As of November 26, 2008 the US government committed an additional $800 billion to two new loan programs with George G Bush’s Bailout Bill, bringing its cumulative commitment to financial rescue initiatives to a staggering $8.5 trillion, according to Bloomberg News. That sum represents almost 60 percent of the nation’s estimated gross domestic product. About $5.5 trillion, come from the Federal Reserve, which as an independent entity does not need congressional approval to lend money to banks or, in “unusual and exigent circumstances,” to other financial institutions.

To supposedly stimulate lending, the Fed said it will purchase up to $600 billion in mortgage debt issued or backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and government housing agencies. It also will lend up to $200 billion to holders of securities backed by consumer and small-business loans. All but $20 billion of that $800 billion represents new commitments, a Fed spokeswoman said.

About $1.1 trillion of the $8.5 trillion is coming from the Treasury Department, including $700 billion approved by Congress in dramatic fashion under the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

The rest of the commitments are coming from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Federal Housing Administration.

What they’ve done (Bush, Obama and the US bankers) is implement a Robbing Peter to pay Paul scheme - or in modern terms - a Ponzi scheme. Robbing Peter to pay Paul scheme is an English idiom referring to taking money (or other items of value) from one party to pay one’s debt to another. In other words, the idiom usually means to create a problem to solve another, especially when applied to money. Today it is known as a PONZI SCHEME - A fraudulent investment scheme paying investors from money paid in by other investors rather than real profits.

The US government is robbing you (one party) to pay another party’s debt - the bad debts of private banks and their shareholders of the US Federal Reserve. They like to call them “Toxic Debt” because they know you would willingly give money to clean up toxic waste than to just give your hard earned money to filthy rich bankers. They are Robbing You to pay Them.

You might have heard about the Ponzi scheme in recent news. Bernard Madoff is a former American businessman and former chairman of the NASDAQ stock exchange, who confessed to, and was convicted of, operating a Ponzi scheme that has been called the largest investor fraud ever committed by a single person. On March 12, 2009, Madoff pled guilty to 11 felonies, including securities fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, perjury and making false filings with the SEC. The plea came in response to a criminal complaint filed two days earlier, which stated Madoff had defrauded his clients of almost $65 billion.

The US government is engaging in the same illegal schemes as Bernard Madoff. Is it right that they get away with it at your expense or should they all receive the same justice under the law? If they continue the end result will be you being jobless, moneyless and homeless.

Bank of America falsified accounting to initiate their massive taxpayers defrauding scheme - reported a $2.39 billion loss but got $20 billion in taxpayers money

In order to hide serious financial problems, some businesses have been known to use fraudulent bookkeeping to overstate sales and income, inflate the worth of the company’s assets or state a profit when the company is operating at a loss. These tampered records are then used to seek investment in the company’s bond or security issues or to make fraudulent loan applications in a final attempt to obtain more money to delay the inevitable collapse of an unprofitable or mismanaged firm. Bank of America did just that but with a new twist - instead of overstating financial gains they overstated loses and devalued banks net worth -they simply declared that they (and other banks) were in trouble when they weren’t. They used fraudulent bookkeeping to state a loss when the company was operating at a profit. They have over a $trillion in assets that would easily absorb their claimed loses. The goal of these tampered records were to devalue the net worth of financial institutes like Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch. By doing so Bank of America was able to buy Merrill Lynch at a fraction of its true value. Bank of America bought Merrill Lynch for $50 billion (Merrill Lynch Total assets US$ 1.020 Trillion) Bank of American would not have been able to scoop up these bargain basement deals unless it engaged in this bank fraud scheme. Bank of America reported a $2.39 billion loss but got $20 billion in taxpayers money - not bad for a record net profit gain. Now thanks to the securities fraud of Bank of America other major banking institutions are the target of hostile takeover by the US government. Hostile takeovers made possible as a direct result of the Bank of America bank fraud scheme of write-down on the value of their sub-prime mortgages.

The proof is in the Earnings reports of companies now in the sights of the US government $700 billion Rob Peter to pay Paul Scheme.

Mar 23rd 2008 Earnings Report

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) posted better-than-expected first-quarter earnings.
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (NYSE: LEH) posted better-than-expected first-quarter earnings. - up 39.1 percent yet filed for bankruptcy protection even with Total assets of US$691.063 Billion.

Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) posted better-than-expected first-quarter earnings.

Credit Suisse Group (NYSE: CS) warned that it expects a first-quarter loss due to write-downs.

Lehman Brothers, 2007 Annual Report

Over the past five years, Investment Banking revenues have grown by 23%, Equities Capital Markets by 40%, and Investment Management by 36%. During this same period, Asia has grown by 38% and Europe by 36%. Our revenues have never been more evenly balanced across our businesses, and we have achieved our best-ever geographic diversification, with half of the Firm’s revenues generated outside the Americas

Total assets ▲ US$691.063 Billion (2007)

Merrill Lynch

Total assets ▲ US$ 1.020 Trillion (2007) Bought by Bank of America for just $50 billion

How else could such giants be bought for pennys on the dollars? Instead of liquidating just a fraction of their assets to cover their loses the US government gave the banks over $8.5 trillion in taxpayers money. Even AIG huge loses could have easily been covered just by selling off (liquidating) a small fraction of their assets instead of robbing you. AIG Total assets is currently US$ 860.418 billion. AIG did what the banks involved in the taxpayers’ money defrauding scheme - they simply overstated their losses - supposedly totalling $61.7bn. No one has audited them to verify this staggering amount. Even with this amount of loses AIG could have easily liquidated assets and still have US$ 800 billion in assets.


Just how much money did both Bush and Obama rip off the American people with their bank bonuses bills? It’s a lot. You can literally build a highway with the stacks of money that went to banks for executives bonuses. To put it in perspective, according to the US Department of Treasury a bill is .0043 inches thick. That means that a one billion dollar thick stack of one hundred dollar bills would be 43,000 inches tall or 3,573 feet tall. Take 3,573 feet multiplied by 700 and you have a stack of $100 bills about 2,501,100 feet high. Now that may sound like a lot, but in metric terms, it’s not. In metric, 2,501,100 feet is only a little over 762 kilometers. Just a little more than the 735 kilometers distance between Chicago and Buffalo, New York. I guess that is what Obama was really talking about when he rushed through his bank bonus bill through Congress - the money for his bill is needed to go the distance - to build his green back road to wonderland.

Maybe Obama doesn’t know how much $700 billion is either. LA Times Obama quote “It is wonderful to be back in Oregon,” Obama said. “Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go”

At a later stop Obama was talking with reporters and expressed concern he’d also mis-stated the number of potential cyclone victims in Burma. He said, “”I hope I said 100,000 people the first time instead of 100 million. I understand I said there were 57 states today. It’s a sign that my numeracy is getting a little, uh.” At that point, an aide cut him off and ushered journalists out. Before he could mis-speak again?

He is as dumb as Bush, only difference being he knows how to make complete sentences - even if they are seriously inaccurate.


Patrick Fitzgerald, the federal prosecutor that led the investigation that indicted Tony Rezko, Stuart Levine, Dr. Robert Weinstein and recently arrested Governor Rod Blagojevich of Illinois, is on the trail of Barack Obama. Obama has long time close ties to these Chicago and Illinois corruption figures and conspired with one or more of them to rig the IL Health Planning Facilities Board when Obama was a member of the IL senate.

Jerome Corsi has written an article for World Net Daily, dated December 15, 2008 that reveals Fitzgerald’s ongoing investigation into Rezko ties and specifically Obama. Here are some excerpts:

Since arresting Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald has renewed interest in convicted fundraiser Tony Rezko’s part in the purchase of Barack Obama’s Chicago mansion, according to a former real estate analyst who says he was interviewed by the federal prosecutor in the past 10 days.

Kenneth J. Conner told WND he was interviewed by investigators from Fitzgerald’s office regarding the purchase of the Obama mansion and the adjacent vacant lot that Rezko’s wife, Rita, purchased simultaneously. Connor filed a civil complaint in October with the Illinois Circuit Court in Cook County alleging he was fired by Mutual Bank of Harvey, Ill., because he objected to land appraisals submitted on behalf of the Rezkos and the Obamas, with the complicity of the bank.

Connor told the FBI, months ago, when he initially was fired, that the bank and the Rezkos were engaged in “fraud, bribes or kickbacks, use whatever term you want,” to benefit the Obamas.

Connor said his lawyer, Glenn R. Gaffney, also has been interviewed by the FBI about the Rezko-Obama deal.

Connor has disclosed that during the initial investigation he met with two FBI agents for approximately an hour and a half to discuss the Rezko-Obama home purchase. “The entire deal amounted to a $125,000 payoff from Tony Rezko to Barack Obama”. He explained: “If in fact the entire deal was a payoff from Tony Rezko to Barack Obama, a payoff or kickback, use whatever word you like, then for the deal to work, what had to happen was that Rezko had to over-pay for the vacant lot by as much as possible, or by the desired amount of the payoff, in any event.” “

This actually happened, with papers signed, cash exchanged and benefits accepted by Barack Obama.

“High crimes and misdemeanors” referred to in the U.S. Constitution are felonies. In the United States, impeachment can occur both at the federal and state level. The Constitution defines impeachment at the federal level and limits impeachment to “The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States” who may only be impeached and removed for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors”.

Doesn’t it make you wonder if Obama is receiving huge kickbacks from the US banks for pushing through his useless Stimulus Bill? Obama has already benefited from very large campaign donations from the very same banks that are ripping off the American people by asking for and accepting US tax dollars (your money) to cover their bad and worthless debts - debts they accumulated with illegal banking schemes. Obama is all about accumulating power and wealth. The IRS should be keeping an eye on the Obama Bank Bonus Plan money. How much does a crime boss take these days? How much did Obama demand the banks give him in return for giving them $150 billion in federal funding? Is he getting 10%, 25% or more?


The infamous AIG bonus pool amounted to peanuts compared with another Wall Street compensation outrage about to take center stage in the great American financial bailout tragedy.

The American International Group story is seared into the public consciousness by now, how employees of the London-based division responsible for most of the insurance company’s problems received $165 million in retention bonuses to stay on at the place they helped wreck.

The story of Merrill Lynch’s $3.6 billion bonus bonanza belongs in an entirely different league. Many of the details have already been disclosed, but they are making headlines again this week because a judge upheld the right of New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo to disclose the names of Merrill executives who shared in the payout just before the crumbling brokerage was sold to Bank of America Corp. late last year.

Start with the money. Besides the mind-bending size of the entire bonus pool, a staggering amount of money was distributed at the top. The four executives who got the most received a total of $121 million, according to Cuomo. The next four got $62 million, and the following six were awarded $66 million. A grand total of 696 Merrill employees received at least $1 million each in bonuses.

But the Merrill story isn’t just about the size of the money pot. How and when the bonus payout took place matter, too.

Merrill accelerated its normal bonus schedule so the awards took place just days before Bank of America acquired the company at the end of 2008. A couple of weeks later, executives suddenly discovered Merrill was bleeding to the tune of $13.8 billion during the final quarter of the year.

So a company that was losing money at a pace of more than $6 million each hour over a period of three months decided to reward its executives with $3.6 billion of bonuses at the very time. That would have been a sad but private story if it ended there, but it didn’t.

Once Merrill’s fourth-quarter financial disaster became apparent, Bank of America and the US Treasury were talking again about what it would take to prop up a crumbling balance sheet. After all, the federal government had been encouraging the bank to buy Merrill as a way to solve another serious financial mess.

The solution was $20 billion. That’s $20 billion of your money deployed to patch together a business whose executives had just been awarded $3.6 billion for their stewardship and achievements in 2008.

Our connections to the bonus pools at Merrill Lynch and AIG are not the same. As taxpayers, we are majority owners of AIG, thanks to our $180 billion “investment” in the company. Retention bonuses were awarded on the government’s watch. The link between taxpayer money and Merrill bonuses is more complicated, but it’s real and outrageous.

US Congress and Obama bought and paid

What do Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Merrill Lynch, Country-Wide, Lehman Brothers and Bank of America, to name a few, all have in common? All corrupt and all were able to keep federal regulators at bay till the end. So how did they do it? Well the first way you do it is lobby to keep Congress off your back and pay them enough to run interference for you. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac gave $200 million to politicians and partisan organizations with the vast majority going to Democrats and left wing think tanks. Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) ( Dodd is the Chair of the Senate Banking and Housing Committee and was given a sweetheart loan from Country Wide), Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton being the top recipients.

While this is certainly a bi-partisan scandal, it is not a balanced one. Those who benefited the most by far are top Congressional Democrats like Dodd and Obama and left wing organizations.


A U.N. panel will next week recommend that the world ditch the dollar as its reserve currency in favor of a shared basket of currencies, a member of the panel said on Wednesday, adding to pressure on the dollar.

Currency specialist Avinash Persaud, a member of the panel of experts, told a Reuters Funds Summit in Luxembourg that the proposal was to create something like the old Ecu, or European currency unit, that was a hard-traded, weighted basket.

Persaud, chairman of consultants Intelligence Capital and a former currency chief at JPMorgan, said the recommendation would be one of a number delivered to the United Nations on March 25 by the U.N. Commission of Experts on International Financial Reform.

“It is a good moment to move to a shared reserve currency,” he said.

Central banks hold their reserves in a variety of currencies and gold, but the dollar has dominated as the most convincing store of value — though its rate has wavered in recent years as the United States ran up huge twin budget and external deficits.

Some analysts said news of the U.N. panel’s recommendation extended dollar losses because it fed into concerns about the future of the greenback as the main global reserve currency, raising the chances of central bank sales of dollar holdings.

“Speculation that major central banks would begin rebalancing their FX reserves has risen since the intensification of the dollar’s slide between 2002 and mid-2008,” CMC Markets said in a note.

Russia is also planning to propose the creation of a new reserve currency, to be issued by international financial institutions, at the April G20 meeting, according to the text of its proposals published on Monday.

It has significantly reduced the dollar’s share in its own reserves in recent years.

What the World doesn’t know yet is that the US plans to control the new World currency by proposing the World use the US made Amero. The US government has the Amero ready to replace the US Dollar. Currently the Denver mint is illegally making the new Amero coins. Obama chose Denver to sign his Stimulus Bill for this very reason. He was signing the death certificate of the United States dollar as his and Bush’s Bank Bonuses are responsible for the collapse of the US dollar.

You can buy the coins right now. You can buy denominational coins from 1 Amero up to 1000 Ameros. The coins are made from Copper, Silver and Gold respective to their specific denominations.

The bush administration has been trashing US and the US dollar in every way possible, such as with the war in Iraq and using overpriced contractors, all so that an illegal corporate currency can be implemented in place of the US Dollar. When the United States spends money it doesn’t have one of two things are usually sure to occur. First that there must be an expansion of the money supply which devalues our currency and second to slow the devaluation, support for that money supply expansion is provided for by borrowing money by issuing Treasury Bills for sale with a long term interest pay back. Treasury Bills (T-Bills) are bought by any individual person, corporation or government, i.e., China, so that they now in the instances of large purchases, can influence all American political decisions. T-Bills can have a life expectancy of up to thirty years.

In Canada we have Mr Brian Mulroney to thank. NAFTA imposes by treaty, yet another level of government, one that supercedes Canada and the US and the US Constitution (along with our Bill of Rights) and imposes a union of the North American countries of Mexico, Canada and the United States of America and constrains us all into the North American Union.

If the majority of North America desire a union, then let us all have a legitimate vote to provide the provinces and territories of Canada and the states of Mexico an opportunity to become states of this United States. And then only by a vote of acceptance by the citizens of first, the United States, and then by concurring votes by the citizens of each individual state and territory in order to decide if they really want to accept a North American Union.

With a vote there would be North American union or the Amero. The majority, if given the information to make an informed decision, would never vote to lose their sovereignty, freedom and rights to a handful of greedy corporate Fascists.

The only way out is to cancel the NAFTA treaty. The treaty is definitely and certainly anti-American! If this NAFTA and Amero were something that was desired by us, then that, against my better judgement, would be what they want. NOT! I believe what we want, is to have our country back, free of outside control, even free of outside control from within.

Out of 106 felony cases, former LA deputy district attorney Vincent Bugliosi has lost 1. Out of 21 murder cases, he lost 0. Bugliosi is best known for his prosecution of Charles Manson and for his best selling book, Helter Skelter.

If a man carefully plans and executes the killing of another, we call him a murderer, arrest and try him, then send him off to the nearest death chamber. In many states, individuals convicted of three felonies are subject to an automatic life sentence under a program quaintly referred to as the “three strikes and you’re out law.” Justice for ordinary citizens in the United States may not be swift but when executed, it is final and unforgiving.

But when a national leader fabricates evidence to support the reasons for war thus causing death to thousands of soldiers and hundreds of thousands of civilians, what do we do? We give him 24 hour a day, 7 day a week protection, a stretch limo and a deluxe plane with all the gas he’ll ever need, and a house full of history and helpers in the middle of the nation’s capitol. We call him “Mr. President.”

Renowned prosecutor and best selling true-crime author, Vincent Bugliosi, has a different idea in his book, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder.

In 2001, the newly elected president began planning the Iraq invasion and occupation described by his Secretary of the Treasury Paul O’Neill:

“From the very beginning, there was a conviction, that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go,” says O’Neill, who adds that going after Saddam was topic ‘A’ 10 days after the inauguration - eight months before Sept. 11.” (CBS News, Jan. 11, 2004).

Investigative reporter Ron Suskind recently reported that faked letters linking Iraq to the 911 attack were coming from the White House. The Bugliosi book explains how the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate was distorted to mislead Congress and citizens into thinking that Iraq was an imminent danger to the United States. The evidence used to support the Iraq invasion was not just flawed. It represented deliberate distortions and deletions that mislead the nation into a war that had little, if anything, to do with national defense.

This has happened before. The Viet Nam War began in earnest with a major escalation after a reported attack on two United States naval vessels in the Gulf of Tonkin that never occurred as described. The incident was a fabrication to justify a major war. It took four decades for the truth about that “attack” to emerge.

Unlike President Lyndon B. Johnson, George W. Bush lives in a time of quickening, a digital age based on the citizens free network, the Internet. In just weeks, highly motivated citizens began to expose the absence of any rationale for war. This started the unraveling.

What is the outcome for our leaders after their war produced deaths and injuries reaching the tens of thousands for United States soldiers plus more than a million deaths of Iraqi civilians lost in civil chaos produced by the war?


What would the American public do if they found out that their social security benefits that they’ve paid into all their lives won’t be there when they need it? Social Security in the United States currently refers to the federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance program. U.S. Social Security is a social insurance program funded through dedicated payroll taxes called Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). Tax deposits are formally entrusted to Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, or Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund, Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund or the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund.

When you pay social security taxes, the federal government takes that money and instead of putting it away to pay your social security benefits in the future, it takes that money and spends it however it wants. So what about the future social security and medicare benefits that the government owes you? There is no money there for those payments. The government is using that money right now to make the budget look better.

The US Supreme Court has established that no one has any legal right to Social Security benefits. The Court decided, in Flemming v. Nestor (1960), that “entitlement to Social Security benefits is not a contractual right”. In simple terms, the decision means that since no one has any legal right to Social Security benefits, Congress can cut or eliminate benefits at any time.

So you are forced to pay into their social security benefits plan all your life and when it comes time for you to receive it the US government can simply refuse to provide benefits to you. Now that Bush and Obama have used up all the accumulated tax revenue for their bailouts and stimulus money laundering schemes they are now using your Social Security payments. Obama is using that money, the future social security and medicare benefits that the government owes you, to pay for his massive debt accumulation packages.

Obama may have sold you on his Change hype but he is no different than Bush or any other US president - he and everyone else is always looking for ways to rob you blind. Obama intends on expanding the US wars to include Pakistan and then Iran. The Bush wars of aggression are what put the US in this economic crisis. Wars have caused the collapse of all great nations and the US will be no exception. Instead of addressing the cause of the US economic crisis by ending the corruption, ending the wars and stop spending money that the US doesn’t have or that the US government doesn’t own - your money Mr Obama ignores or is complicit with the corruption, expands the wars, and is now spending your retirement money.

The total liabilities of the United States government, including future social security and medicare payments that the U.S. government is already committed to pay out, now exceed 65 TRILLION dollars, which is more than the entire GDP of the whole world.

According to the 2008 Financial Report of the United States Government, which is an official United States government report, the U.S. actually had a budget deficit of 5.1 trillion dollars in 2008.

So why did the Congressional Budget Office report that the federal budget deficit was only 455 billion dollars (which is certainly a total disaster) in 2008?

The difference lies in accounting. The CBO’s figures are based on cash accounting, while the 2008 Financial Report of the United States Government is based on GAAP accounting. GAAP accounting is what is used by all the major firms on Wall Street and it is regarded as a much more accurate reflection of financial reality.

So why is there such a big difference?

Well, what the Congressional Budget Office does is some really bad accounting. When you pay social security taxes, the federal government takes that money and instead of putting it away to pay your social security benefits in the future, it takes that money and spends it however it wants.

So what about the future social security and medicare benefits that the government owes you?

There is no money there for those payments.

The government is using that money right now to make the budget look better.

That’s right, you have been conned.

And as bad as the numbers from 2008 look, they do not reflect any significant money from the monstrous financial bailouts that Congress has passed.

So 2009 is going to look MUCH worse.

Pretty picture, eh?

The reality is the the United States of America is a total financial disaster.

Already, 13 banks have already failed in 2009. All of the bailouts certainly don’t seem to be helping much yet.

But that doesn’t mean that the federal government is going to give up trying to help. It seems a new “bailout” or a new “stimulus” is being passed almost weekly now.

Instead of accepting the fact that we must adopt a lower standard of living and deal with the reality of our massive debt, the politicians are trying to crank up the debt spiral one more time.

The truth is that all of this government spending will help the economy in the short term, but it will make the long term problems of the U.S. government far worse.

So who is going to buy all of this new government debt? China has serious doubts about who is going to buy all of America’s new debt. The reality is that the only way that the government can “bailout” anyone or pay for any “stimulus” bill is to borrow.

So America borrows and borrows and borrows and borrows.

If your own personal finances were like that, how do you think it would end?

Ah, you are starting to get the picture…..

The “American Dream” is quickly becoming the “American Nightmare” and most of the politicians don’t have a clue.

What are you going to do when the economy collapses and everything you ever worked for starts coming apart?

It is time for all of us to start thinking about what is truly important…..


President Barack Obama and his national security advisers are considering expanding the U.S. wars of aggression into Pakistan far beyond the tribal areas near the border with Afghanistan, the New York Times reported on Tuesday.

Two high-level reports on Pakistan and Afghanistan that have been forwarded to the White House in recent weeks have called for broadening the attacks against the sovereign territory of Pakistan to in and around the city of Quetta, the newspaper said on its website, citing senior administration officials.

Missile strikes by CIA drones have until now been limited to the tribal areas, and haven’t as yet been extended into Baluchistan, a sprawling province under the sovereign authority of Pakistan’s central government, and which is next to parts of Afghanistan where recent fighting has been fiercest, the newspaper website said.

Pakistan very strongly objects to the US missile strikes, saying they are a violation of its sovereignty.

Pakistan Foreign Office spokesman Abdul Basit said on Wednesday “As we have been saying all along, we believe such attacks are counter-productive,” he said. “They involve collateral damage and they are not helpful in our efforts to win hearts and minds.”

Many of Obama’s advisers are also urging him to sustain orders issued last summer by former President George W. Bush to continue the illegal Predator drone attacks against a wider range of targets against Pakistan and to conduct illegal cross-border ground attacks, using CIA and Special Operations commandos.

Obama is proving as each day goes by that he is not a man of change or for change. Obama is just another warmonger and therefore war criminal. Obama is planning for and ordering more deadly attacks against innocent countries, killing thousands of innocent civilians including women and children.

United Nations Charter
Article 2

The Organization and its Members, in pursuit of the Purposes stated in Article 1, shall act in accordance with the following Principles.

1. The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.
2. All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.
3. All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.
4. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.


Israel’s incoming right-wing Nationalist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ‘ordered’ President Obama to release disgraced Wall Street investor Bernard Madoff or ‘risk full and total war’. Former Mossad agent and the wealthiest American-Israeli Bernard Madoff gave $billions to finance Israel’s Global intelligence network reported to have been responsible for numerous attacks against its perceived enemies, including the catastrophic attacks upon the US on September 11, 2001.

Bernard Madoff, accused of an “unprecedented” $50 billion financial swindle, was charged with 11 criminal counts that could put him in prison for the rest of his life. Madoff, 70, a former Nasdaq stock market chairman and money manager, plead guilty on Thursday. The financier, who has spent three months under house arrest in his $7 million Manhattan penthouse, will be sentenced June 16.

US prosecutors provided new details of the fraud in court papers, saying Madoff’s crime spree lasted from “at least” the 1980s. The government said in court documents it wants Madoff to forfeit all of the money and property that can be traced back to the alleged fraud — a sum it estimated at more than $170.8 billion.

What the US public doesn’t know is that Madoff is also alleged to be the chief financier for a vast Israeli spy and sabotage network set up by former Israeli Security Agency (Shin Bet) director Jacob Perry (Yaakov Peri) who ‘transformed’ himself into one of America’s most powerful businessman and led what FSB sources call the смертоносная шатия 7.

Leaders of this American-Israeli cabal who besides Madoff and Perry include:

Henry Taub, Hungarian born American-Israeli who created the giant United States payroll company ADP which continues to funnel to Israeli intelligence services financial records for nearly every US citizen.

Maurice Greenberg, American-Israeli who was the former chairman and CEO of American International Group (AIG), the World’s 18th largest public company and its largest insurance and financial services corporation which has (so far) funneled over $180 billion in US taxpayer money directly to Israel.

Larry Silverstein, the American-Israeli billionaire who secured a lease for the World Trade Center buildings in New York on July 24, 2001, insured them for $3.55 billion spread among 24 different insurance companies, and after their destruction 2 months later on 9/11 collected $4.55 billion for Israel.

Mort Zuckerman, Canadian born American-Israeli billionaire who through his vast publishing empire has direct control over 70 percent of the news reported in the United States.

Edouard de Rothschild, French born American-Israeli member of the all powerful European Rothschild Banking Empire and director of the Rothschild & Cie Banque reported by the FSB to hold nearly 80% of the wealth stolen by Israel from the United States Government and its citizens.

Madoff was ‘convicted’ in a ‘one of a kind’ designed trial in which his guilty plea kept all evidence against Israel’s betrayal of the United States from being entered into official US records as it was deemed by the Obama administration as ‘too incendiary’ for the US people to know about and would, most certainly, unleash an Israeli backlash.

Israeli Defenses Forces Chief of Staff Lieutenant-General Gabi Ashkenazi, threatened the US that “an Israeli military strike was a “serious” option”, and which would ignite a Total Global War in which the very survival of the United States would be in the balance.

President Obama, however, appears ‘more than willing’ to confront the Israelis, especially after being informed of the full extent of Israel’s involvement in the 9/11 attacks and the other attacks planned by the Israeli assassination and sabotage teams sent into the United States posing as Israeli ‘art students’, and of which the Washington Post reported on in the immediate aftermath of the attacks before going permanently silent:

“In addition to the 1000-plus Middle Easterners of the Muslim persuasion swept up in Ashcroft’s post-9/11 dragnet, it seems, some 60 Israelis were in custody. And these were no ordinary tourists: INS officials testified in immigration court hearings that this group was “of special interest to the government” – the same argument used to justify the detention of Arabs in connection with the investigation into 9/11.”

Israel wants their imprisoned agent Madoff to receive the same treatment as the US government gave to the leader of the former vast energy giant Enron, Kenneth Lay. Prior to being convicted for what at that time amounted to the biggest corporate fraud in American history, Kenneth Lay was ‘rescued’ by the CIA (who were the actual ‘founders’ of Enron and used its billions in fraudulent gains to support the vast Bush-Clinton drug empire) by falsifying his death and giving him a new identity.

Why is Bernard Madoff in prison? Former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer collected evidence tying J.P. Morgan, Smith Barney, American International Group (AIG), Merrill Lynch, Bank of America and shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to the massive Bernard Madoff ponzi scheme,which involved looting and destroying the pension funds of millions of American across the United States. A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that pays returns to investors from their own money or money paid by subsequent investors rather than from any actual profit earned.

Evidence collected is also tying former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, as well as former Citibank CEO Sandy Weill, to backdoor secret accounts headquartered at Citibank and Bank of America, which allowed Chertoff and Weill, as well as major elected Democratic and Republican Party officials, to what one can describe as special ‘Black ATM Cards’, which allowed these anti_American individuals to actually shift funds from the Bernard Madoff hedge fund account to various offshore secret proprietaries all tied to none other than Merrill Lynch.

President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and president Barack Obama’s U.S. Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, are currently cooperating with Federal prosecutors in New York state concerning the misuse of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in the massive Madoff ponzi scheme.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan along with former U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, have been subpoenaed to testify before the New York Federal Grand Jury.

It is all but public knowledge but the state of California has gone bankrupt and its entire CalPERS (California Public Employees’ Retirement System) pension fund, headquartered at the Bank of America in San Francisco, is broke! The pension funds, are tied to Merrill Lynch and Bernard Madoff’s ponzi scheme.

As of January 16,2009, Merrill Lynch has accumulated up to $118 TRILLION of mortgage and credit swap derivatives, all linked to former NASDAQ Chairman, ponzi scheme artist and Israeli Mossad asset, Bernard Madoff.


Foreign ownership of companies of Canada has long been a controversial political issue in Canada. Concerns regarding foreign ownership generally regard ownership by individuals or companies based in the United States, though foreign ownership occurs from entities and individuals based in other countries as well. Some estimates state that more than 50% of the petroleum and gas industry and more than 50% of all manufacturing in Canada is foreign-owned and foreign-controlled.

Who do Canadians have to thank for that? None other Brian Mulroney with Free Trade and Stephen Harper who has allowed more Canadian companies to be bought by US companies than any other Prime Minister - as minority Prime Minister at that. Stephen Harper has been making secret behind closed doors deals with the US to buy out Canada. If there’s one thing this PM knows how to do - it’s how to hand control of Canadian companies and resources to foreign control. At a time when the U.S. is starting to nationalize its companies and restrict foreign imports, Harper is doing just the opposite. On March 10, 2009 it was reported that the Harper government is proposing to relax its oversight of
foreign takeovers, even as it cranks up the political pressure on foreign companies that acquire Canadian firms to ensure such deals benefit Canada.

Under amendments to the Investment Canada Act contained in the budget bill, the Conservatives have proposed raising the threshold under which foreign takeovers by companies from WTO-member countries come under review to $1 billion in enterprise value. The current threshold is $312 million in asset value. Except when companies’ stocks are severely undervalued, their enterprise values generally exceed their asset values, which partially reduces the impact of the change.

The increase, to be phased in over four years, means that deals worth more than $1 billion will not be vetted by the government under the act, which requires that foreign takeovers represent a “net benefit”
to Canada. Fewer foreign companies will likely have to apply for approval to acquire Canadian businesses under the new rules.

The Canadian government has always encouraged foreign investment, and I don’t expect that to change. I do, however, expect officials to be more vigilant about national-security concerns. The foreign-investment changes are one example of measures included in the budget bill, which was fast-tracked through the House of Commons and the Senate, that deserve further study in Parliament.

Foreign owned companies among Canada’s current largest companies

* General Motors Canada, Canada’s largest automotive manufacturer, owned by Detroit-based, General Motors
* Wal-Mart Canada, wholly owned by Wal-Mart of the US
* Toyota Canada Inc. owned by Japan’s Toyota
* Ford Motor Company of Canada, owned by the American Ford company
* Imperial Oil, controlled by US ExxonMobil, which owns 69.8% of its stock.
* Chrysler Canada owned by US - Cerberus Capital Management - purchased 80.1% of its parent company Chrysler LLC.
* Shell Canada, owned by Royal Dutch Shell.
* British Petroleum Canada, owned by British Petroleum
* Mitsui and Company, part of the Japanese Mitsui empire
* Honda Canada Inc., owned by Honda of Japan
* Ultramar fuels, owned by US-based Valero
* Costco, whose Canadian operations are the 7th largest private company in Canada as of 2006, is based in Seattle
* Labatt Brewing Company purchased by Belgian brewer Interbrew in 1995
* Hudsons Bay Company, Canada’s largest retailer, and North America’s oldest corporation (est. 1670), sold to U.S. investor Jerry Zucker in 2006.
* ING Bank of Canada, the largest foreign bank in Canada, formed by the purchase of several small Canadian companies, controlled by the Dutch ING Group
* Sears Canada, one the largest retailers (created by buying old Simpson’s stores), controlled by the US Sears Holdings Corporation
* IBM Canada, owned by IBM
* Safeway Canada supermarkets, owned by Safeway Inc.
* Cargill Ltd. owned by Cargill of Minnesota
* McDonald’s Canada, owned by McDonald’s
* Pratt & Whitney Canada owned by US United Technologies Corporation
* Nissan Canada, owned by Nissan Motors of Japan
* Parmalat Canada owned by Parmalat of Italy
* Molson Brewries, one of the oldest companies in Canada merged in 2005 with US-based Coors to form Molson Coors Brewing Company (No longer I am Canadian)

Former major Canadian Companies acquired by foreign owners

* MacMillan Bloedel, B.C. forestry giant acquired by Weyerhaeuser for US$2.45 billion in 1999
* JDS Fitel announces $8.9-billion merger with U-S.-based Uniphase to form JDS Uniphase, in 1999. Company headquarters move from Ottawa to San Jose.
* Eaton’s, at one time Canada’s largest retailer, with a history going back to 1869, purchased by Sears in 1999, and closed in 2000
* Seagram distillery and entertainment conglomerate, sold to Vivendi Universal and Pernod Ricard in 2000
* Corel, a software and programming company, taken over by Vector Capital in August 2003.
* PetroKazakhstan a Calgary-based company exploring in Central Asia, was purchased by the Chinese state-owned China National Petroleum Corporation in 2005
* CP Ships Ltd., acquired by the parent company of Hapag-Lloyd Container Line, TUI AG, in an all-cash transaction worth $2.3 billion US in 2005
* Playboy Enterprises, housing the infamous “bunnies” and magazine, in 2006.
* Terasen Inc., previously BC Gas (a public utility company), sold to American-owned energy giant Kinder Morgan for $6.9 billion. The deal was approved by the B.C. Utilities Commission despite 8,000 letters of protest, 2005. Terasen was subsequently sold to Newfoundland-based Fortis Inc. in 2007.
* Canadian Pacific hotels the owner of many of Canada’s most historic hotel properties (operating under the name Fairmont Hotels and Resorts since 1999) is sold to Colony Capital, LLC of California and Kingdom Holding Company of Saudi Arabia for $3.9 billion, in January 2006.
* Dofasco, Canada’s largest steel maker acquired by Luxembourg-based Arcelor, January 2006.
* Noranda (mining company) & Falconbridge Ltd., purchased by Swiss mining company Xstrata in 2006. Noranda had earlier been a target of state-owned China Metals Corp., but had backed out in 2005 amid public concern in Canada of Chinese state control of such a major company.
* ATI Technologies, Canada’s graphics chip maker, acquired by Advanced Micro Devices, July 2006.
* Stelco, Canada’s last major independent steel producer, taken over by United States Steel in August 2007.
* Alcan purchased by Rio Tinto in 2007.

Other examples of lost Canadian identity and assets

* Bell Centre, owned by George N. Gillett Jr. - an American businessman
* Montreal Canadiens, owned by Club de hockey Canadien, Inc., also owned by George N. Gillett Jr..
* Creo Inc., a world leader in digital printing software acquired by Eastman Kodak
* Zenon Environmental Inc., a successful and innovative technology company spawned in Hamilton — sold to General Electric Co.
* Tim Hortons, sold to US Wendy’s International in 1995, later to be sold to the public an IPO in 2005.
* CN Rail, the historic Canadian railway, now estimated to be 2/3 US owned. It should be noted that many US shareholders gained shares in CN when they received CN shares in exchange for their original shares in US railways like Illinois Central. Another interesting fact is that when CN planned to merge with US railway BNSF in 1999, it was the American government that stopped the project.
* Gulf Canada Resources, which had formerly been part of US-based Gulf Oil, but had since become independent, was purchased by US-based Conoco in a deal worth $6.7 billion in 2002.
* Moore Wallace sold to U.S.-based R.R. Donnelley and Sons for $4.9 billion.
* Masonite, bought out by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
* ID Biomedical, Canadian vaccine maker acquired by Drug giant GlaxoSmithKline for $1.8 billion.
* Vincor International Ltd., Canada’s top wine maker and distributor, purchased for $1.4 billion by Constellation Brands Inc. of Fairport, NY, USA
* Bauer, Cooper, and Hespeler, historic hockey equipment manufacturers bought by Nike in 1994
* CCM (The Hockey Company), acquired by Reebok in 2004


There is one single common denominator to the US and Global financial crisis. What does AIG, mortgage foreclosures, and bank failures have in common? All have had their credit rating downgraded by French owned Fimalac in the last 6 months. You may not have heard of Fimalac. Fimalac, a Paris-based industrial and financial services player owns Fitch Ratings - the same credit rating agency that started AIG financial troubles when it suddenly downgraded AIG to A, from AA - worsening its financial health. Shares of AIG immediately plunged 61% with Fitch Ratings’ downgrade.

The credit downgrades forced the company to turn over billions of dollars in collateral to its derivatives trading partners. Without financing, which was being arranged by Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase in talks with the Federal Reserve officials, AIG may be forced to declare bankruptcy.

AIG’s declining financial state comes in the immediate aftermath of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, and for similar reasons - Paris owned Fitch Ratings unexpectedly downgrading its credit rating. Major credit ratings agencies Standard’s & Poors, Moody’s, and Fitch, as well as A.M. Best, an organization specializing in insurance company ratings, all downgraded AIG which looks like a direct attack against AIG to force its collapse. So the question is who controls Fitch Ratings and who ordered them to start the US and Global financial crisis by downgrading banks and insurance brokers credit ratings? It looks as though someone intentionally ordered credit rating agencies to suddenly downgrade banks’ credit rating.

AIG was downgraded in September 2008 by Fitch Ratings which also downgraded 4 Icelandic banks - Glitnir Banki hf. (Glitnir), Kaupthing Bank hf. (Kaupthing), Landsbanki Islands (Landsbanki) and Straumur Burduras Investment Bank (Straumur) the same month. Countrywide Financial Corp was added to the list of banks and mortgage lenders who have seen their debt ratings lowered by Fitch Ratings. Because of Fitch Ratings downgrading Bank of America bought out Countrywide Financial Corp and Merrill Lynch (credit rating also drastically downgraded by Fitch Ratings) at bankruptcy prices - how convenient.

According to their website; “Fimalac (parent company of Fitch Ratings) made its first investment in the ratings business in 1992, when credit ratings were still relatively unheard of in Europe, with the aim of leveraging the opportunities that were expected to arise from financial market deregulation and disintermediation.”

“It was clear from the outset that a French base would quickly prove too small to build a rating agency, and at the end of 1992 Fimalac seized the opportunity to purchase Ibca, a small London-based agency with 38 employees that had an excellent reputation, particularly in European bank ratings.”

“The period 1993-1997 was devoted to widening Ibca’s ratings offering and growing the business, focusing on Europe.”

Hold on just a minute. According to their own website their goal is to manipulate the financial market by deregulation and disintermediation. Have you noticed that they are a privately owned company. A privately owned company that no doubt has shareholders who have one goal in mind - make money - by downgrading other companies. All of their downgrading is based on speculation - their own assessment and assertion as to how another company will perform. Something is horribly wrong here. The US is in financial trouble as a result of a private foreign company which knowingly, willingly and eagerly manipulates the US financial market just by issuing a speculative downgrade of assets. That means that a foreign state has more control over the US market than its own government. Doesn’t the SEC realize that Fitch Ratings is engaging in securities fraud - stock market manipulation, insider trading, revenue recognition, including fraudulent reporting of fictitious sales, inaccurate timing of revenue recognition, and improper valuation of revenue. An attack on the financial market by a foreign states is still an attack on the sovereignty of the United States.

Fitch Ratings is committing securities fraud by wrongfully devaluing banks and mortgage lenders stocks. In every instance of Fitch Ratings downgrading they cite “poor outlook” which really means speculation. Fitch Ratings said late Thursday that it downgraded the issuer default rating and senior unsecured debt ratings of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. on the basis that ‘AAA’ ratings are not appropriate for financial-oriented companies in the current economy. Are you kidding me? They downgraded Berkshire Hathaway Inc. not because of poor earnings or credit but because they have a rating too high for the financial crisis Fitch Ratings created in the first place. That is clearly an SEC violation. Who paid Fitch Ratings to devalue Berkshire Hathaway Inc. stocks? Watch and see who buys out Berkshire Hathaway Inc. - all a direct results of Fitch Ratings credit rating downgrading that means a crash in Berkshire Hathaway Inc. stocks.

Credit rating agencies such as Fitch Ratings have been subject to criticism in the wake of large losses in the collateralized debt obligation (CDO) market that occurred despite being assigned top ratings by the CRAs. Critics realize that Fitch Ratings engages in unfair market share manipulation by devaluing corporations’ credit ratings based on speculation. As they are privately owned with shareholders they issue a downgrading of a company’s credit rating based on how they were paid to downgrade a target company.

Guantanamo - In criminal law, kidnapping is the taking away or asportation of a person against the person’s will, usually to hold the person in false imprisonment, a confinement without legal authority.

The Obama administration said Friday that it is abandoning one of President George W. Bush’s key phrases in the war on terrorism: enemy combatant. On Oct. 17, 2006, Bush illegally signed a law suspending the right of habeas corpus to persons “determined by the United States” to be an “enemy combatant” in his Global War of Terror.

To Bush’s support for the law — the Military Commissions Act of 2006 — and its suspension of writs of habeas corpus, Jonathan Turley, professor of constitutional law at George Washington University stated, “What, really, a time of shame this is for the American system. What the Congress did and what the president signed … essentially revokes over 200 years of American principles and values.”

Bush’s Military Commissions Act of 2006 was not the first time in the history of the U.S. Constitution that its guaranteed right to writs of habeas corpus has been suspended by an action of the President of the United States. In the early days of the U.S. Civil War President Abraham Lincoln suspended writs of habeas corpus. Both presidents based their action on the dangers of war, and both presidents faced sharp criticism for carrying out what was clearly an attack on the Constitution. On Friday Obama followed Lincoln and Bush by supporting the unlawful suspension of writs of habeas corpus,

The Justice Department said in legal filings that it will no longer use the term to justify holding prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. But that won’t change much for the detainees at the U.S. naval base in Cuba — Obama still asserts the military’s authority to hold them - suspending the right of habeas corpus.

“This is really a case of old wine in new bottles,” the Center for Constitutional Rights, which has been fighting the detainees’ detention, said in a statement. “It is still unlawful to hold people indefinitely without charge. The men who have been held for more than seven years by our government must be charged or released.”

The Justice Department said authority to hold detainees comes from Congress and the international laws of war, not from the president’s own wartime power as Bush had argued.

Retired Army Lt. Col. Stephen Abraham, a former Guantanamo official who has since become critical of the legal process, said it’s a change in nothing but semantics.

“There’s absolutely no change in the definition,” Abraham said in a telephone interview. “To say this is a kinder more benevolent sense of justice is absolutely false. … I think the only thing they’ve done is try to separate themselves from the energy of the debate” by eliminating Bush’s phrasing.

The Supreme Court ruled that Guantanamo detainees have rights under the Constitution. It is still unlawful to hold people indefinitely without charge. Obama has chosen to change only the wording. Obama asserts as did George W Bush that he is above the law and as such continues to unlawfully hold people indefinitely without charge or due process. Obama is proving to be just another criminal.


A new audio message the US made of deceased Osama Bin Laden accuses moderate Arab leaders of conspiring with the West against Muslims. Bin Laden, who has been America’s most wanted man since the 9/11 attacks in 2001, and who has been confirmed killed in November 2001 in Tora Bora (confirmed by former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto), also renewed his attacks on Israel in the recording from the grave.

It was a broadcast by the Qatari-based TV channel al-Jazeera which was obtained from the US propaganda film broadcast programmers for al-Jazeer - Allied Media Corp,

“It is clear that some Arab leaders have plotted with the Zionist-Crusader [Israel-Western] coalition against our people,” the US speaker on the tape says, without naming any leader.

“These are the leaders that America calls moderate.”

The US also accuses Israel of war crimes against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, where it waged an offensive earlier this year, leaving some 1,300 people dead.

The US calls for a renewed jihad and urges militants to first conquer Iraq and then Jordan, which can be used as a route into the West Bank.

This US made and aired audio tape impersonating the deceased bin Laden can only mean one thing - the US government is planning another 9/11 attack against the United States. This new audio tape also means that US president Obama has ordered that new threats be made against the US and Arab nations. This means Obama has reneged on his promise of CHANGE. Obama is continuing what George W Bush started - fear mongering to further the US agenda of terror against the US and foreign states.

Translation of bin Laden’s Funeral Article in Egyptian Paper:
al-Wafd, Wednesday, December 26, 2001 Vol 15 No 4633

News of Bin Laden’s Death and Funeral 10 days ago

Islamabad - A prominent official in the Afghan Taleban movement announced yesterday the death of Osama bin Laden, the chief of al-Qa’da organization, stating that bin Laden suffered serious complications in the lungs and died a natural and quiet death. The official, who asked to remain anonymous, stated to The Observer of Pakistan that he had himself attended the funeral of bin Laden and saw his face prior to burial in Tora Bora 10 days ago. He mentioned that 30 of al-Qa’da fighters attended the burial as well as members of his family and some friends from the Taleban. In the farewell ceremony to his final rest guns were fired in the air. The official stated that it is difficult to pinpoint the burial location of bin Laden because according to the Wahhabi tradition no mark is left by the grave. He stressed that it is unlikely that the American forces would ever uncover any traces of bin Laden.

The Bin Laden death report seemed to receive an echo of support from Pakistani ruler Musharraf in January of 2002.

From I think now, frankly, he is dead for the reason he is a … kidney patient,” Gen. Pervez Musharraf said on Friday in an interview with CNN.

Musharraf said Pakistan knew bin Laden took two dialysis machines into Afghanistan. “One was specifically for his own personal use,” he said.

“I don’t know if he has been getting all that treatment in Afghanistan now. And the photographs that have been shown of him on television show him extremely weak. … I would give the first priority that he is dead and the second priority that he is alive somewhere in Afghanistan.”


It is becoming increasingly clear that the US is aiming for global rule of the World. Obama policies are already showing signs that he will usher in a New World Order with the US as the global rulers. To squash any dissent in the US the Pentagon announced that Obama has ordered it to station 20,000 armed US Soldiers in the United States itself to help ‘protect’ the Homeland from attacks - in direct violation of the US Constitution.


Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

“That no standing army shall be kept up in time of peace, unless with the consent of three fourths of the members of each branch of Congress; nor shall soldiers, in time of peace, be quartered upon private houses, without the consent of the owners.”

It is becoming increasingly clear that Obama is sounding more like a dictator than a president. Obama wasn’t even sworn into office and he issued the order to totally disregard the United States Constitution. Even today he has stated that he alone will decide what policy will be. Another “I am the decider” who aims to be another Adolf Hitler.

So what can the US people do to defend themselves from a future tyranny? What can other nations’ people do to defend themselves from wars of aggression from the US? Even though the US may be the most technologically advanced military nation on Earth their technology is their weakness. A bomber or fighter jet can be grounded or forced to crash. Civilians being attacked can stop a tank, Humvee or attack vehicle in its tracks and force the soldiers to dismount and leave the protection of their armored vehicles. The entire US military relies heavily on sensors to both defend themselves and attack innocent people. There are no longer any openings in tanks that would make the tank crewman venerable to attacks. There are sensors and video feeds that keep track and track targets. So to stop them in their tracks all an individual would have to do is blind those sensors. Bank robbers today usually blind the video cameras in a bank when they attempt to rob it. They spray the camera lens with paint or cover it. The same application can be applied to any moving combat vehicle. Paint balls or paint bombs that target the sensors and video will force the tank to stop and the tank will no longer be able to select any new target. Painting or oil spraying the sensors and videos makes a $million tank useless. The same applies for aircraft. Anti aircraft shells with paint or oil canisters can really mess up a canopy of $billion aircraft. There is no way any pilot can clean the canopy after its just flown through paint or oil bursts. The pilot will be forced to eject.

So to defend yourself, start stocking up on oil based paints. Your life may depend on it. Your freedom will depend on it. Oil based is better as it can also start a fire in the engines or jets of any military aircraft or transport vehicle. Your government is taking away you weapons that you will need to defend yourself. You can still defend yourself using every day household items like kitchen knives, glass, baseball bats, barbecue propane tanks, gas cans, liquor, aerosol air fresheners and paint.


Primary stock holders of the US Federal Reserve are also the bankers of the New World Order. The same banks that are declaring a Global Economic crisis are the very same ones stealing $trillions from the US people and the people of foreign states in the most elaborate money laundering scheme in history. The below named shareholders of the US Federal Reserve and NWO have orchestrated the US and Global Economic Crisis. They are the ones who have solely benefited from George W Bush Bailout and Obama’s Stimulus Plan. They have manipulated the stock markets in order to take control of the banks not under their control in the US, the UK and other foreign states. They have falsely reported huge $billion losses in order to coerce the US Congress to put themselves into bankruptcy with $billion bank bailouts. They have engaged in insider trading in order to execute hostile takeovers of banks and investment groups not under their control. They are:

* BNP Paribas Securities Corp.
* Bank of America Securities LLC
* Barclays Capital Inc.
* Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
* Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
* Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
* Daiwa Securities America Inc.
* Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
* Dresdner Kleinwort Securities LLC.
* Goldman, Sachs & Co.
* Greenwich Capital Markets Inc.
* HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.
* J. P. Morgan Securities Inc.
* Merrill Lynch Government Securities Inc.
* Mizuho Securities USA Inc.
* Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
* UBS Securities LLC.

Who is behind the push for a New World Order?

1) Freemasonry

The basic recruitment of members to further the Elite’s plans is through the secret society network of Freemasonry which is the latest incarnation of the Christian/military order known as the Knights Templars who gained staggering riches and a wealth of esoteric knowledge during the Crusades, in which the ‘righteous’ Christians were dispatched to the Holy Land with free reign to slaughter the Jews and Moslems in a series of campaigns between the 11th and 13th Centuries.

The vast majority of members are on the first three rungs of the thirty-three level hierarchy and have no idea of the hidden agenda.

Once initiated into the lowest level – the first of thirty three degrees – vows are taken to pledge allegiance to the society above all else. Most initiates are willing to do this as the temptation of power, wealth and knowledge is hard to refuse. It is hinted that there are penalties to pay for betraying their society and revealing its secrets but at this level the organization is viewed by its members as little more than a secretive social club with a morality based upon chivalry. Certain of what appear to be esoteric secrets are revealed to them upon initiation as a ‘taster’ for what is to come as long as the initiate remains faithful to the order. Money is then paid by the initiate in order to progress to the second degree through a ceremony involving the revelation of yet further secret knowledge with the promise of more to come at each stage.

Initiation into higher degrees requires increasingly larger sums of money and still the clues keep coming; promises of wonderful arcane knowledge are continual yet the actual knowledge revealed remains encoded and only serves to whet the appetite. No one is ever given the full scenario, only pieces of what appears to be a picture of the most awesome significance. As more and more is revealed and the higher up the ladder the initiate is allowed, the greater are the personal perks provided and doorways opened in terms of career and social status. Moreover, the warnings against transgression of the secret society’s rules become blatant and more sinister at each step.

It is impossible to achieve high levels of initiation within Freemasonry unless one is hand picked by those of the higher degrees. In order to do this, one must meet their criteria of wealth, status, social class and character type. By the time the twentieth degree is reached a minimum of professional level income is required to fund progression through the system. The result of this financially dependent progression is that the top level members of the Brotherhood elite are among the richest, and most powerfully influential people in the world. They are also responsible, directly and indirectly for most of the money/power based crime such as the illegal drugs industry, political assassinations, Satanism and mind control which goes on every day, all round the world.

At the apex of the pyramid of the Brotherhood are the select few who actually know the full agenda of the organization. These privileged elite have become known as the ‘Illuminati’, which is Latin for ‘illuminated ones’. All other members (nearly five million world-wide) are ignorant of the true purpose of their individual organisation as a front for the Illuminati. Only the most suitable are selected to rise in the ranks, those recognised as being wealthy, ambitious and corrupt enough to perpetuate the ultimate goal which is world domination. No one but the Illuminati actually knows anything of importance and therefore cannot betray the game plan. Everyone else provides a front, a smoke screen of ignorance and misinformation and all must offer complete obedience to the will of their organisation or be banished (or worse). The same thing also happens in our universities whereby particularly talented scholars are approached with magnificent offers of wealth and status in order to follow unofficial secret research programs into such topics as UFOs, psychic warfare and advanced energy sources.

Betrayal of the Brotherhood is the worst crime possible in the eyes of its members and is ultimately punishable by death. The Brotherhood is all powerful: all top level members of the police and military forces around the world are placed there through the Brotherhood as Brotherhood tools. Judges and lawyers, media moguls, businessmen and politicians are recruited so that no member of the Brotherhood elite is ever in danger of being held accountable by the System for any crime or misdemeanor. The Brotherhood can, and quite literally does, get away with murder because it is also the law which opposes it. If a non-Brotherhood member should slip through the net and achieve high status then there are ways to ensure that such people are unable to achieve their full potential. For example, I doubt if Prince Charles will ever fulfil his right of kingship as he has publicly refused to enrol with the Freemasons. It infiltrates every area of our society at all levels, but at the top, in the highest social and monetary bracket, the Brotherhood prevails almost in total. It is the single largest vehicle for the perpetuation of the Luciferic consciousness on Earth.

One of the ways by which the faithfulness of members is ensured, especially in the higher levels is by the insistence that the initiated give details of their most intimate secrets to the organization, so that if any transgression of the rules were to occur then this information would be revealed and used to publicly destroy the individual concerned. As an example of this, one Masonic branch, the Skull and Bones Society, centred around the Harvard and Yale universities, was founded on opium money, is blatantly racist, has some particularly bizarre rituals including an initiation which includes lying in a coffin with a ribbon tied around the genitalia whilst masturbating and shouting out one’s greatest sexual fantasies. It boasts amongst its members (who, remember, swear complete allegiance to the society above all other commitments) George Bush, Percy Rockefeller, Winston Lord (one time CFR chairman) and nine members of the board of the Morgan Guaranty Trust (see House of Rothschild).

Also associated with Freemasonry within the Elite’s own hierarchy are other esoteric societies such as the Grand Orient Lodges, the Knights of Malta, the Knights Templar, P2, the Black Nobility and today the Knights of Columbus.


The Brotherhood owns the law, they own the military, they own the oil companies, pharmaceutical companies and just about everything which provides fuel for the status quo. It sets the standards for education, it sets the curriculum, it plants seeds via the media and education systems of what will later become, through tender nurturing, power hungry, dis-satisfied, spiritually unaware slaves to their System. If it was not so sinister it would be purely perfect in its all encompassing design.

While the first three degree Masons and Round Table members are raising money for charity and enjoying relatively harmless social events, their superiors in the Craft are organising wars, drug pushing, co-ordinating assassinations, mind-control, raping and murdering young children in Satanic abuse and formulating plans for world domination.

History has convinced me that it is possible to get away with virtually any crime as long as it is on a large enough scale.

The U.S. presidents, also thirty-third degree Masons, are financed into the position not as leaders of men but as a tool of the Brotherhood. All allegiance come secondary to the bonds within their secret society, on pain of death. Political systems are also a front for the Brotherhood elite. Not as representatives of the people, elected by the people, for the people, but as tools of and for the Brotherhood. Science is controlled to the benefit of the elite, wars are created and manipulated to the benefit of the elite. Every time a bomb is dropped or a tank built, ultimately it is the multi-national businesses who profit, especially the oil industries and world bankers. All is Brotherhood controlled. The scale of the manipulation in all areas of the status quo is almost immeasurable and for this reason virtually unbelievable to most prisoners of the System.

Canadian freemasons include the following Prime Ministers:

John A. MacDonald
John Abbott
MacKenzie Bowell
Robert Borden
Richard B. Bennett
John G. Diefenbaker

Governors of Canada
John George Lambton, 1st Earl of Durham (1838) i. 1814, Granby Lodge No. 124, Durham

2) The Round Table

The Round Table was established in the 1891 as a Masonic-like secret society to manipulate events to lead to a centralised global government. The leading lights were Cecil Rhodes, whose wealth largely derived from the exploitation of South African diamond reserves, and Alfred Milner, a Rothschild agent who took over after the death of Rhodes. Financial backing also came from the Rockefellers. Groups were established throughout the world, working behind the scenes through a co-ordination of world banks in order to bring pressure on governments to promote the New World Order.

As well as Milner, who effectively controlled Lloyd George’s War Cabinet during the Great War, members in the first half of this century included Arthur Balfour (then Foreign Secretary, later Prime Minister and whose Balfour Declaration created the State of Israel); Lord Astor who owned The Times; and Nathan Rothschild, Governor of the Bank of England. After WW1, the Round Table was instrumental in the formation of the League Of Nations, the forerunner of the Elite-controlled United Nations.

Rhodes’ legacy includes a bequeathal of funds for the financial sponsorship of selected overseas students who attend Oxford University to be sold the New World Order. These ‘Rhodes Scholars’ include Bill Clinton.

The influence of the Round Table and that of the various groups it has spawned is prevalent today, although the majority of members will have no idea of what they are involved in.

3) Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA)

One of the more public Round Table creations is the Royal Institute of International Affairs which is based at Chatham House in London and was formed in 1920 by the Anglo/American delegations from the Treaty of Versailles meetings. Prominent in the British delegation was Alfred Milner. The RIIA’s patron is the Queen of England.

Supposedly, the RIIA is a ‘think tank’ but in effect it determines British policy. And yet, its membership list is never divulged and it is shrouded in secrecy. Information that has been obtained reveals that its current joint presidents are Lord Carrington (former Foreign Secretary, director-general of NATO and close business partner of Henry Kissinger), Lord James Callaghan (former Foreign Secretary and Prime Minister) and Lord Roy Jenkins (former Chancellor of the Exchequer and president of the European Commission).

Funding is derived from its corporate members which is a vast list including government departments, petrochemical companies (who also fund its Environment Programme!), merchant and high street banks, newspapers, television stations, the Church of England, Amnesty International …etc..

4) Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)

In 1921, funded by the Rockefellers, the RIIA founded its American wing – known as the Council on Foreign Relations. As its membership is marginally more public than its British counterpart it is clearly seen that anyone who has had any influence on American or global politics ever since has been a member of the CFR. This includes 14 of the last 18 US Secretaries of State; the previous eight CIA directors; the majority of presidential and vice-presidential candidates including Eisenhower, Nixon, Carter, Mondale, Ford, Nelson Rockefeller, Bush and Clinton.

5) The Bilderberg Group (Bil)

This was convened for the first time in May 1954 by Polish socialist Joseph Retinger, a major voice behind the European Union. Also instrumental in its creation was Prince Bernhard of the House of Orange in the Netherlands (former German SS officer an spy via chemical company I.G. Farben and who later became chairman of Shell Oil). It was to be a group of leading politicians and their advisors, executives from media, banking and multinational corporations, educationalists and military leaders who would meet to discuss the global future by addressing matters of critical importance in an off-the-record manner so that the distractions of politics could be kept out of the way.. The group has since met annually in strict secrecy and despite the considerable high level media representation in the group the meetings are never reported.

Leading the group is an unelected steering committee, the chairman of which since 1991 has been Lord Carrington. Members outside this committee probably do not know the agenda towards which the group is working and are merely invited to be sold the public face of the New World Order for them to expound its virtues in their areas of influence.

Bilderberg Members include:
* Prince Philip (1965, 1966, 1967), Duke of Edinburgh
* Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands
* Prince Bernhard
Politics- United States
* George W. Ball (1954-1992),former U.S. diplomat
* John Edwards
* Henry Ford
* Bill Clinton (1991),former US President, 1993 - 2001
* Jon Corzine (1995 - 1997[4], 1999, 2003, 2004), former US Senator, current Governor of New Jersey
* Richard N. Haass (1991, 2003, 2004), president, Council on Foreign Relations
* Lee H. Hamilton (1997), former US Congressman
* Christian Herter (1961, 1963, 1964, 1966), former Secretary of State
* Joseph E. Johnson (1954), former President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
* Henry Kissinger (1957, 1964, 1966, 1971, 1973, 1974, 1977-2003, 2004, (2005-2008), Secretary of State, 1973 - 1977
* Sam Nunn (1996, 1997), former US Senator
* Rick Perry (2007), Current Governor of Texas
* Barack Obama - US President

Politics- United Kingdom

* Ed Balls (2006), former Economic Secretary to the Treasury and advisor to Gordon Brown, since 2007 Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families
* Tony Blair (1993), former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom[18]
* Peter Carington, 6th Baron Carrington (Steering Committee member), former Foreign Secretary
* Kenneth Clarke (1993, 1998, 2006 & 2007), former Chancellor of the Exchequer
* Denis Healey (founder and Steering Committee member), former Chancellor of the Exchequer
* David Ormsby-Gore, 5th Baron Harlech (1958, 1966), former British Ambassador to the United States
* George Osborne (2006) (2008) Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer 2004-Present; member of the opposition 2001-Present
* Eric Roll (1964, 1966, 1967, 1973-1975, 1977-1999) (Bilderberg Steering Committee), Department of Economic Affairs, 1964, later Bilderberg Group Chairman
* Margaret Thatcher (1975), former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom

Just some of the prominent Canadian people who have attended one or more conferences organized by the Bilderberg Group.

* Lester B. Pearson, former Prime Minister of Canada
* Pierre Trudeau (1985), former Prime Minister of Canada
* Jean Chrétien, Canadian Prime Minister, 1993 - 2003
* Paul Martin, Canadian Prime Minister, 2003 - 2006
* Stephen Harper (2003), Canadian Prime Minister, 2006 – Present
* Bernard Lord, former Premier of New Brunswick
* Robert L. Stanfield, former Premier of Nova Scotia
* Jason Kenney (2007), Canadian Member of Parliament
* Preston Manning, former leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, leader of the Reform Party of Canada
* Lloyd Axworthy, former Minister of Foreign Affairs (Canada)
* Kevin G. Lynch, Canadian civil servant
* Jacques Parizeau, former Premier of Quebec
* Robert Bourassa, former Premier of Quebec
* Jean Lesage, former Premier of Quebec
* Mike Harris, former Premier of Ontario
* Ralph Klein, former Premier of Alberta
* Gerald Regan, former Premier of Nova Scotia
* Duncan, James S.
* Frum, David
* Griffin, Anthony G.S.
* Macdonald, Donald S.

6)The Trilateral Commission (TC)

Also known as the ‘Child of Bilderberg’, this group was founded by David Rockefeller in 1972-73 to covertly unify the policies of the US, Europe and Japan. Jimmy Carter’s presidency was their first major coup with the president and many members of his administration being Trilateralists, including Zbigniew Brzezinski, his national security advisor and the first director of the Trilateral Commission.


This symbol nowadays is commonly known as the Star of David. It is also considered a Jewish symbol. However, there is no evidence that shows this symbol to be of Jewish origin. In fact, the traditional symbol of the Jews was the Menorah [which has it’s own sacred meaning], but the ‘Star of David’ was more so imposed on the Jews during the Medieval period to identify them for persecution. In fact, it only became popular as a Jewish symbol in the past 200 years [which is very recent, historically speaking], especially after having been adopted as the symbol of the flag of Israel. The Jewish people are marked with the same Antisemitism symbol (yellow star) used by Hitler to mark the Jews for extermination.

The true name of the symbol is the Double Interlaced Triangle of Solomon, or the Seal of Solomon [it is also the sign of Vishnu, a god of GENERATION]. To show the depth of Mystery School symbolism, I will broadly describe its meaning.

There was never a real “King Solomon.” The word Solomon is to be broken down into three parts, Sol, meaning SUN in latin, Om, a sacred word in Hindu/Buddhist/Vedic traditions also meaning the SUN, and On, which is the ancient Egyptian word for their city of the SUN (also known as Heliopolis). The symbol is consisting of two equilateral triangles, one pointed up, and the other pointed down. The triangle pointing up represents FIRE and the MALE principle [dominant, control, make things happen, etc.]. The triangle pointing down represents WATER and the FEMALE principle [submissive, spontaneous, let things happen, etc]. Thus we say, men are from MARS [FIRE] and women are from VENUS [WATER].

The two triangles together form a SIX sided star. The number SIX is extremely important to the Mystery Schools, who held it to be the number of MANIFESTATION or GENERATION. This is because SIX is the number of sides of a cube [the Sacred Geometrical figure of FOUNDATION], SIX is the number of fundamental forces [to the ancients], SIX is the only number in which it’s factors are three consecutive numbers [the first three numbers!] which add up to itself [6=1×2x3=1+2+3=6]. In the Bible, God takes SIX days to create the world, and creates man on the SIXTH day. Even today we use the word “sex” to describe the GENERATIVE act.

Thus, the Seal of Solomon is a symbol of the SUN and it’s GENERATIVE powers. The bonding of male and female is not meant literally as in sex but metaphorically to represent the universal principle of DUALITY as well as the androgynous nature of the Absolute/Creator [both male and female, fire and water, everything and nothing]. To the Mystery Schools, gender is a quality of imperfection, as by definition, each gender is lacking in something that the other has. In order to create life, it is reasoned that the Creator must have both male and female properties. Anyway, this can go on and on as we can delve into the intricacies of the symbol [it also represents ETERNITY], so for all points and purposes, just know that it is a symbol of the SUN and it’s GENERATIVE powers.

It is adopted as the symbol of the flag of Israel to symbolize the power of the Cult of the SUN and the GENERATION of a New World Order. The Jewish people are not taking over the world or anything like that, but rather the Jewish people are being used by those who are, unknowingly. The nation of Israel is the planting of the seed to disrupt the Old Arabic Order. The Illuminati likes to hide from criticism behind the shield of anti-semitism.

This symbol is not limited to Israel. You will find this symbol on the Great Seal of the US as well, and if you pay attention, you will begin to see it in a lot of unexpected places [especially those that relate to the secret societies].


After 9/11 … the Central Intelligence Agency was very deeply involved in domestic activities against people they thought to be enemies of the state. Without any legal authority for it.

There was a story in the New York Times that mentioned something known as the Joint Special Operations Command – JSOC. It is a special wing of the US special operations community that is set up independently. They do not report to anybody, except in the Bush-Cheney days, they reported directly to the vice-president Dick Cheney office. They did not report to the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff or to Robert Gates, the secretary of defense. They reported directly to Cheney.

Congress has no oversight of it. It’s an executive assassination ring. In the Times there was a story that its leaders, a three star admiral named William H. McRaven, ordered a stop to it because there were so much collateral deaths - innocent bystanders were also getting killed.

Under President Bush’s authority, they’ve been going into countries, not talking to the ambassador or the CIA station chief, and finding people on a list and executing them and leaving. That’s been going on, in the name of all of us.

They are committing what we would normally call murder. They are young men that went into the Special Forces. The Delta Forces . Navy Seals. Highly specialized.

In many cases, they were the best and the brightest. Guys that went in to do the kind of necessary jobs that they thought was legal and was needed to do to protect America. And then they find themselves torturing and murdering innocent people.

‘What do you call it when you interrogate somebody and you leave them bleeding and they don’t get any medical committee and two days later he dies. Is that murder? What happens if these crimes go before a committee?”

Simply put they’re not gonna go before any committee because the US is so corrupt that law enforcement agents are all bought and paid for - paid to look the other way and allow these assassinations, torture and murders to continue, even today.

US law prohibits the act of state-sponsored killing

Executive Order 12333 prohibits the act of state-sponsored killing. This Order, which was drafted in the mid-1970s in the wake of revelations of government involvement in plots to kill several foreign leaders, has been maintained by every administration since President Ford. In recent years, however, there have been several attempts by Congress to override Executive Order 12333. The most recent of these initiatives is H.R. 19, the “Terrorist Elimination Act of 2001.”

The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907 produced a number of major international instruments, including the Convention on the Law and Customs of War on Land. Although modeled on earlier works, this treaty was the first multinational codification of the laws of land combat to be adopted.

Article 23(b) of the annex to this convention stated that “the right of belligerents to adopt means of injuring the enemy is not unlimited, it is especially forbidden . . . to kill or wound treacherously individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army.” This article is now held to embody the customary rule of treachery, and is widely interpreted to re-link the practice of treachery with the act of assassination.

Any all all US military forces are all valid and legal military targets

Both the Hague IV Convention and the laws of war permit attacks upon any and all valid military targets at any time or place. Any all all US military forces, whether they be Marines, Special Forces, Army, Navy or Air Force personnel, are all valid and legal military targets - the law permits attacks upon them at any time or place. The US cannot assume it has legal authority to try anyone for murder of any member of its military forces - it has not legal right especially when the US is the aggressors as in their illegal attacks and illegal occupations of 2 foreign sovereign sates - Iraq and Afghanistan. There is also a legal consensus that a civilian head of state who serves as commander-in-chief of the armed forces can be designated a valid and legal target in times of war.

Combatants may engage any valid target at any place and time, but assassinations are only those killings of targets that are accomplished by “treacherous” means—as defined by Article 23(b) of the Annex to the Hague IV Convention—or alternatively accomplished through “outlawry,” as first defined by the Lieber Code.60

It is important to note, however, that killings that are not assassinations may be illegal for other reasons. The laws of war place a number of restrictions upon the use of force generally, such as the requirement that every attack must reflect the basic requirements of military necessity, proportionality, and discrimination. Furthermore, the combat death of a noncombatant, if not an assassination, is illegal under laws prohibiting the unnecessary infliction of civilian casualties.

US transition - the “in the red” Obama flag for the United Socialist States of America. Most Communist states adopted centrally planned economies. For this reason, Communist states are often associated with economic planning in both popular thought and scholarship. Now that the separation of powers has became very blurred in the US, it seems logical to name the US the “communist states” by analogy with the communist ideology (”A New Beginning”, “Yes We Can”, “Change” versus “More of the Same”, “Organize for Change”, “Change We Can Believe In”) that now rules them.

The collapse of Empires is nothing new. They come and go, as any student of history can see. In ancient times, we can read of the decadence of the Roman Empire, which brought about its collapse. In more recent times, the older among us in Great Britain have witnessed the collapse of the British Empire, which included one quarter of the population of the world.

Although that Empire crumbled away from 1945 on, as colony after colony became independent, in reality its real downfall had already begun in 1917. It was in that year that Great Britain went bankrupt as a result of the Great European War that had been started in 1914, largely by the megalomaniac Kaiser and international armament manufacturers. Thus, in 1917 Great Britain had been forced to borrow money from financiers in order to continue the war, making political compromises to do so (1). 1917 and not 1914 marked the real turning-point in world history in other ways too. It was after all in 1917 that the Russian Revolution, financed from New York, took place and within a few weeks the USA had entered the European War. As a result there began what many call ‘the American Century’, nearly a hundred years of US dominance of the world, as Western Europe entered not only into its first suicide pact of 1914-1918, but also its second, from 1939-1945.

However, the collapse of the British Empire since 1945 and at more or less the same time that of other Western European Empires, like the French, the Belgian and the Portuguese, is not the most recent collapse of Empire that we have witnessed. In some ways the collapse of the Soviet Empire, from 1989 onwards, was even more dramatic. Embroiled in a pointless, imperialistic war started in Afghanistan by a senile leader, the Soviet Empire had gone bankrupt and so lost its colonies. Like the collapse of the British and other Western European Empires, the Soviet collapse also echoed the collapse of the decadent Roman Empire, which has always provided an imperial model for Imperialism.

For the bankruptcy of the Soviet Empire, like that of the British and Roman and all other Empires, was not only financial, but also spiritual and therefore moral (for spirituality is the source of morality). Almighty God allows empires because they do more good than harm. However, there always comes a decadent phase, when they begin to do more harm than good. And thus they are allowed to fall. Such was the case of the British Empire, which went from noble, even Evangelical, aims and fell all too often to base commercial greed, in its opium wars in China, its concentration camps in South Africa and in its immoral colonial class in East Africa, India and the Caribbean.

The spiritual bankruptcy of the Soviet Empire became apparent to me in 1976. Then, visiting the Soviet Empire, I saw how nobody believed in Communism. I saw how the country was ruled by cynicism and inertia. Already then the ‘Communists’ clearly did not believe in their own ideology, but were a Mafia simply out to line their pockets, boredly clapping Communist gerontocrats, who themselves did not believe in their system. Little wonder that at that time the writer Solzhenitsyn called for people there to stop living the lie (‘zhit’ ne po lzhi’). He knew that once people started living for the truth, then the whole system would collapse. That is precisely the process that began after 1985. At that time the Party no longer ruled, even in name, the Empire was simply ruled by a Mafia, an Establishment kleptocracy (‘nomenklatura’ in Sovietspeak). Fortunately, since the year 2000, that criminal class has largely been eliminated and some of them now live in exile in London (where they are sheltered by the British government) and Russia has revived.

However, it has become clear that this is not the last collapse of an Empire which we are to witness. For we are now witnessing the collapse of the American Empire. This is the very Empire, whose rise began ninety years ago. It seems that although the American Empire has outlasted the Soviet Empire, it is to last less long than any of the Western European Empires, let alone the Roman Empire. Although it began in 1917, its golden age was to be in the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. Then, surely, it did more good than harm and the generosity of its people became legendary and is still warmly appreciated.

However, already in the 1960s and 1970s, its power had peaked and decadence was becoming visible. Thus, it lost the Vietnam War, because, supporting a corrupt and unpopular regime, it lost the moral high ground, even against the Communist enemy. Already in the 1970s, the same Solzhenitsyn warned the Western world of its moral bankruptcy and was disbelieved.

Today, the USA, supported to some extent, or at least not actively resisted, by a spineless and venal Western Europe, has started wars against Serbia, Afghanistan and Iraq, and may even want to start a war in Iran. These are all wars which it cannot win and indeed wars which it is already clearly losing. Baghdad, which means ‘God-given’, has indeed become a graveyard for poor and unknowing American soldiers, sent to die by a government for invisible ‘weapons of mass destruction’

Not only does the American Empire, led at best by incompetence, at worst by greed and lies, suffer bankrupting, unwinnable and terrorizing wars, which are begun out of hubris (the illusion of self-satisfied pride). It also has a national debt of several trillions of dollars, which is supported largely, but temporarily, by China’s purchase of US government debt. Now with its illusory debt-financed boom over, the US is plunging into a crisis, as its housing bubble has burst and it faces soaring oil prices. With a dumbed down public education system, at its worst capable of turning out some of the most ill-educated and ill-behaved children in the world (not unlike the system in the UK), with a health system intent on profit and not health, with a non-existent public transport system, with a throwaway culture of unparalleled wastefulness, with an obesity crisis without precedent in human history, with a dollar so weak that American corporations are asking to be paid in euros, there are those who wonder how much longer the American Empire can continue. And this is no time for Western European countries to gloat. Having passively, or actively bought into the illusory ‘American dream’ for so long, they too will have to help pay the cost of the real American nightmare. Western Europe is dragged down by the measure of its own compromises with the ideology of pride, that is imaginary superiority.

Do not fear - the fall of the US empire is not the end of the World

Some love to despair and are already preparing for the end of the world. But this is an exaggeration. The American Empire will not collapse overnight; nor will Western Europe be dragged down very suddenly. This process is taking years, not a few days. And the collapse of the American Empire is not necessarily the end of the world, simply the end of a world. It can be positive, not negative. Just like climate change, all this is happening in order for our age to become an opportunity to overcome the excesses of the past, an opportunity to repent, to change of way of life, an opportunity to rebalance the world.

For all you Americans who haven’t connected the dots yet the US is already a one party state - Socialists. You were robbed of your freedom with the Bush administration and now Obama’s goal is to finalize the ushering in of Socialism. Don’t believe it. All socialist leaders have rallied support for their agenda with slogan just like Obama has uttered - “A New Beginning”, “Yes We Can”, “Change” versus “More of the Same”, “Organize for Change”, “Change We Can Believe In”. All socialist leaders have brainwashed their fellow citizens to willingly accept protectionism - defend the homeland. All socialist leaders have set up spy agencies that do not spy on foreigners but their own people - Hitler had the Gestapo, the USSR has the KGB (English translation is Committee for State Security) and the US now has the DHS (Department of Homeland Security). All socialist states take control of their country’s private banks and major industries - Bush started this and Obama is finalizing it. All socialists leaders create the illusion that they are the savior of the people by putting the unemployed to work with state sponsored building projects - building roads and bridges and public buildings.

Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating public or state ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and a society characterized by equal opportunities for all individuals, with a fair or egalitarian method of compensation.

Socialism is not a concrete philosophy of fixed doctrine and program; its branches advocate a degree of social interventionism and economic rationalization, sometimes opposing each other. Another dividing feature of the socialist movement is the split between reformists and the revolutionaries on how a socialist economy should be established. Some socialists advocate complete nationalization of the means of production, distribution, and exchange; others advocate state control of capital within the framework of a market economy. Socialists inspired by the Soviet model of economic development have advocated the creation of centrally planned economies directed by a state that owns all the means of production. Others, including Yugoslavian, Hungarian, Polish and Chinese Communists in the 1970s and 1980s, instituted various forms of market socialism, combining co-operative and state ownership models with the free market exchange and free price system (but not prices for the means of production). Social democrats propose selective nationalization of key national industries in mixed economies and tax-funded welfare programs and the regulation of markets.

The two British SAS soldiers that were detained by Iraqi authorities after they allegedly failed to stop at an Iraqi police roadblock and subsequently opened fire on the Iraqi police, killing one and wounding another.

How would the US public react if they ever found out that the US government was killing its own people in order to accommodate and get support for the US government’s Afghanistan agenda? Would they hunt down and lynch George W Bush, Barack Obama and the people in their administration? There is concrete evidence that supports the allegation that the majority of IED are planted by the CIA. It is no coincidence that when Bush got into trouble concerning his wars of aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan that very soon after a number of US, Canadian and NATO soldiers are killed by an IED. Just this past week Canada lost 3 more soldiers to an IED. They were drawn out, ambushed and killed. Canada’s Minister of Defense reiterated that Canada’s mission in Afghanistan would end in 2011 contradicting US assumption that Canada would be extending its mission far beyond 2011.

It isn’t the the legitimate governing body of the Afghan people, the Taliban, who are killing US, Canadian and NATO troops, it is the CIA. Their goal is the same as it always is - to implement the President policies by whatever means possible - legal or not.

Soon after George W Bush declared Mission Accomplished in Iraq the IED bombings began. He prematurely declared the end of the war and the US people and the World expected Bush to withdraw troops from Iraq. This was not the case. Bush was taking the opportunity to gloat about what he had done - illegally invaded Iraq and no one said or did anything to stop him. Bush intended on invading Iraq and occupying it for decades to come. So to provide an excuse to stay he ordered the CIA to begin killing his own troops and blame Iraq’s Insurgency (US refuses to call them the Resistance) for his attacks. The proof was revealed when Iraqi police arrested 2 UK Special Forces operatives who were dressed as Middle East men and were carrying weapons and explosives in their vehicle. Their mission was to plant IED that would kill either Iraqi civilians or US and UK troops. The UK broke them out of jail for fear of the 2 men confessing their actions to the Iraqi police. Tanks destroyed the police station so as to destroy all evidence of the UK being involved in the killing of its own people with an IED.

The US wrote the book for the insurgency. By arming and training the mujaheddin in Afghanistan to fight the Soviets in the 1980s, the US created the modern dynamics of asymmetric warfare. That extends even to the fearsome armor-piercing “explosively formed penetrators,” or EFPs, that the US have accused the Iranians of supplying to the Iraqi resistance. The CIA referred to these tank busters as “platter charges” in the days when the US were covertly helping provide them to the Afghan rebels. The CIA provided the mujaheddin with the know-how on making the the same weapons that are now used against US, Canadian and NATO forces in Afghanistan. The CIA trained the mujaheddin on how to make improvised explosive devices (IED). The same people who were killing Soviet troops, in an effort to regain their freedom from the Soviet occupation of their country, are using their CIA training to kill their new enemy - the US, Canadian and NATO troops that now occupy their country.

If your country were attacked and occupied by a foreign military forces you too would do whatever it takes to free your country and countrymen from your enemy. The truth is that the US, Canadian and NATO troops are the enemy of the Afghan people. The Afghan people did not ask for the US to attack it. The Afghan people did not ask for the US to invade their country to rebuild the illegal Opium drug trade and steal their financial future - the natural gas pipeline. The US helped the Afghan people liberate itself by providing the weapons and the training to make IED during the Soviet occupation. It is only logical for the Afghan people to fight and resist another invasion and occupation of the country even when it is the US and Canada.

The Afghan people did not attack the US on September 11, 2001. They are the victims here as the US attacked them and now occupy their country without provocation. There are no al Qaeda (a phantom enemy fabricated by the US as an excuse for their wars of aggression, crimes against humanity and war crimes that include kidnapping, torture and mass murder) in Afghanistan and the Taliban are not terrorists, they are the legitimate government of Afghanistan that were illegally overthrown by the US. The Taliban are defending their country from the Afghan people’s new enemy - the US and NATO forces.

Were 3 Canadian soldiers killed by the US as a direct threat to the Canadian government for not continuing to support the US illegal war of aggression in Afghanistan? Means, motive and opportunity says the US killed those Canadian soldiers by planting the IED. The CIA trained the mujaheddin to make IED and now that an IED is the main weapon of choice used by the Afghan Resistance to defend their country and countrymen from Afghanistan’s new enemy then the CIA is responsible for killing US, Canadian and NATO forces in Afghanistan. The US is solely responsible for the majority of US, Canadian and NATO forces IED deaths. Remember that the CIA does not normally engage in terrorism by sending its own employees to plant bombs, etc. Rather, it tends to act through intermediaries and recruited foreign nationals including mercenaries, agents, operatives and even impressionable teenagers and fathers who are so desperate to feed his starving family that he would, for a price, do the CIA dirty work of planting an IED.


According to a report by the Israel Insider, “it is now a certainty that the birth certificate claimed by the Barack Obama campaign as authentic is a Photoshopped fake.”

The Insider claims that a ’senior spokesman’ for the Hawaii Department of Health examined the purported birth certificate and says that there are a number of features embedded in a genuine birth certificate that Obama’s posted version clearly lacked.

An authentic Hawaiian birth certificate for another Hawaiian individual has since surfaced which, using the same official form as the presumptive Obama certificate, includes an embossed official seal and an authoritative signature, coming through from the back. Obama’s alleged certificate lacks those features, and the certificate number referencing the birth year has been blacked out, making it untraceable and invalidates the certificate (the certificate clearly states on the bottom that “ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE” - blacking out the certificate number is an alteration that invalidates the certificate) .

Janice Okubo, Director of Communications of the State of Hawaii Department of Health, states: “At this time there are no circumstances in which the State of Hawaii Department of Health would issue a birth certification or certification of live birth only electronically.” And, she added, “In the State of Hawaii all certified copies of certificates of live birth have the embossed seal and registrar signature on the back of the document.”

So if he were registered as being born in Hawaii, Barack Obama — because only he or another member of his immediate family could by law request a “Certification of Live Birth” — must have a certified paper copy, with embossed stamp and seal, or he could request one. But what his campaign has put forward as genuine, according to the senior spokesman in the relevant department of the State of Hawaii, is not in fact a certified copy. It is not valid. Sample of a certified paper copy of a Certification of Live Birth

If the birth certificate actually is fake, then it means that Barack Obama is Constitutionally disqualified as a presidential candidate and as such disqualifies Obama as president of the United States.

If he was born in Kenya, as some suspect, then either there is some record of his entry into the United States, or he is not merely disqualified for the office of president, but he is probably an illegal alien, as well.

The requirement for automatic citizenship is that one parent must have resided in the US for at least six years after reaching age sixteen. Obama’s mother wasn’t old enough at the time of his birth to meet that requirement.

Obama has refused to release a certified original because one doesn’t exist. What is more likely is that he doesn’t want to reveal what else it might say. There are all kinds of other things that could prove embarrassing;

1.) Obama’s parents weren’t married — and, if they were, Obama’s father was a bigamist. In either instance, Obama is better served keeping it out of the public discussion.
2) His father’s race: Is he listed as African? Or Arab? Or even ‘Muslim’?
3) His birth name. Is it Barack Hussein Obama? Or Barry Dunham (his mother’s maiden name?)

Obama could clear up the mystery by authorizing the State of Hawaii to release his official birth records to the public. Or he could simply apply for a certified copy of the original and release the paper copy to the public for examination. Either option would put the issue to rest once and for all.

In the meantime does the United States have another first - first non-American to become president of the United States of America? Until a certified copy or the original birth certificate is produced Obama could very well be an illegal - The U.S. Constitution requires any president be born an American citizen.


The US government orchestrated financial crisis and bailouts are 9/II Sequels. The Bush administration attacked the financial district on September 11, 2001 and attacked it again on October 03, 2008. More recently President Barack Obama held the US Congress hostage until they met his ransom demands of a mammoth $787 billion stimulus package on Tuesday Feb. 17, 2009.

Immediately after the US government attacked its own country, murdering its own people, they introduced the Patriot Act which robbed the American people of their rights and freedoms. Immediately after Bank of American caused the stock market to begin to crash they introduced the Bailout Act which robbed the American people of their money and property. These US government attacks against its own resulted in legislation being rushed through the House without the required debate (as required by law). Each time the US leaders created a state of panic in order to create a false state of emergency. With the bailout and stimulus packages they forced the US people into accepting a new form of martial law. Martial law is the system of rules that takes effect when the leader of a country orders the military to take control of the normal administration of justice. George W Bush ordered his Treasure Secretary to take control of the entire financial sector. Then Treasure Secretary Paulson was made marshal of the entire US financial sector - a clear violation of the US Constitution (the Supreme law of the US) in regards to separation of power.

A hostile takeover is an acquisition in which the company being purchased doesn’t want to be purchased, or doesn’t want to be purchased by the particular buyer that is making a bid. How can someone buy something that’s not for sale? Hostile takeovers only work with publicly traded companies. That is, they have issued stock that can be bought and sold on public stock markets.

A stock confers a share of ownership in the company that issued it. If a company issued 1,000 shares, and you own 100 of them, you own a tenth of that company. If you own more than 500 shares, you own a majority or controlling interest in that company. When the company makes major decisions, the shareholders must vote on them. The more shares you have, the more votes you get. If you own more than half of the shares, you always have a majority of the votes. In many respects, you can control the company.

So a hostile takeover boils down to this: The buyer has to gain control of the target company and force them to agree to the sale. The US government - Bush bailout and Obama stimulus plans did exactly that. It created the financial crisis so that they could gain control of all the major US banks, forcing all to take the deal whether they want or even need help.

The two primary methods of conducting a hostile takeover are the tender offer and the proxy fight.

A tender offer is a public bid for a large chunk of the target’s stock at a fixed price, usually higher than the current market value of the stock. The purchaser uses a premium price to encourage the shareholders to sell their shares. The offer has a time limit, and it may have other provisions that the target company must abide by if shareholders accept the offer. The bidding company must disclose their plans for the target company and file the proper documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Sometimes, a purchaser or group of purchasers will gradually buy up enough stock to gain a controlling interest (known as a creeping tender offer), without making a public tender offer. This bypasses the Williams Act, but is risky because the target company could discover the takeover and take steps to prevent it. Both the Bush bailout and Obama stimulus legislation, that were obtained by coercion, bypasses the SEC. Treasure Secretary Paulson was made dictator of the financial market. He did not answer to anyone, not the SEC, not Congress, not any court in the land. Under the Bush Bailout and Obama Stimulus Act, what they decide goes and they arrogantly declare that no bank has a say in the matter.

The U.S. Treasury will engage in the hostile takeover (they are calling it invest) in Nine Major U.S. Banks - Citigroup Inc. Goldman Sachs Group Inc (Paulson was acting Treasure Secretary but full-time Goldman Sachs CEO), Wells Fargo & Co., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., Merrill Lynch & Co. (bought out by Bank of America for $50 billion meaning Bank of American will get federal funding twice), Morgan Stanley, State Street Corp. and Bank of New York Mellon Corp. None of nine banks getting government money was given a choice about it, said people familiar with the plans. All of the banks involved will have to submit to compensation restrictions as mandated by Congress (actually as decided by Henry Paulson and Obama’s Treasure Secretary).

$125 billion was used to recapitalize other financial institutions around the country. Neel Kashkari, a former U.S. Treasury official overseeing the rescue of the financial system, said the equity purchases will be aimed at “healthy'’ firms. Firms not in trouble will be forced to take $125 billion, a move to control not only the failing banks but all banks.

Defenses Against Hostile Takeovers

There are several ways to defend against a hostile takeover. The most effective methods are built-in defensive measures that make a company difficult to take over. These methods are collectively referred to as “shark repellent.” Here are a few examples:

* The Golden Parachute is a provision in a CEO’s contract. It states that he will get a large bonus in cash or stock if the company is acquired. This makes the acquisition more expensive, and less attractive. The bailout proposal, before it was passed, specifically included provisions to prevent the defense against a hostile takeover by the US government. It was reported repeatedly that the bailout called for caps on how much a CEO could ask for and receive in bonuses or stock. This was purposely included to take away the banks main weapon of self-defense in a hostile takeover. Eventually the US government gave CEOs of the banks they wanted to takeover huge bonuses. They did this so as to overt future law suits and SEC fraud charges against their illegal hostile takeover of the targeted banks. They can now claim that their takeover was legal as the CEOs were offered and took large bonuses - all now conveniently all public record.

*The supermajority is a defense that requires 70 or 80 percent of shareholders to approve of any acquisition. This makes it much more difficult for someone to conduct a takeover by buying enough stock for a controlling interest. Again the bailout scheme takes away this safety net. The government made it law that whatever the Treasure Secretary decides, goes. He was given an automatic majority vote. Because the government has declared that the entire financial sector was failing, even banks showing a profit, all banks are subject to this emergency financial rule (much the same as martial law).