Strict Standards: Only variables should be passed by reference in /home/preswquq/public_html/nbg/fp-includes/core/core.fpdb.class.php on line 302

The following video demonstrates actual vote-flips on the ES&S iVotronic, by showing how the failing machines, when not calibrated properly, can flip a vote from one candidate to any other. It’s apparently just a coincidence that, so far, all of the confirmed reports of vote-flips this year have been away from Democratic candidates.

It should also be noted that it doesn’t matter what is shown on the screen when a voter votes on one of these devices which will be used by approximately one-third of American voters this year. The fact is that it’s strictly impossible to confirm that any vote ever cast during an election on any Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-screen) voting machine was ever recorded accurately for any candidate or initiative on the ballot, as per the voter’s intent.

This video, demonstrating one way that votes flip from one candidate to another on DREs

A forged flyer going to voters in a closely fought Virginia congressional district seems aimed at suppressing Democratic turnout on Election Day.

Purporting to come from Virginia’s Board of Elections, the flyer says “All Democratic party supporters and independent voters supporting Democratic candidates shall vote on November 5th.” That’s one day after Election Day.

Whoever is circulating the flyer seems concerned with electing Republicans. The phony information tells “Republican party supporters and independent voters supporting Republican candidates” to vote on Nov. 4, the real day of the election.

Link to report Phony flier says Virginians vote on different days

The government has cleared the way to ship out $125 billion bonuses this week to the country’s largest banks, beginning the biggest government swindle in history.

“The money will go out the door for those institutions early this week,” predicts Assistant Treasury Secretary David Nason, one of the chief architects of the rescue plan.

Not only is the money ready to be sent to nine major financial institutions, including Bank of America, Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase, but the government is reaching preliminary agreements with a group of more than a dozen major regional banks, who will share a part of an additional $125 billion the government hopes to pump into the banking system.

This is clearly the largest swindle in US history as the banks that are receiving the $125 billion bonuses are not in financial trouble. According to the 2008 Fortune 500 report the banks that are receiving government money have made large profits.

8 Citigroup Earnings $159.229 billion Profit $3.617 billion
9 Bank of America Corp. Earnings $119.190 billion Profit $14.982 billion
12 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Earnings $116.353 billion Profit $15.365 billion
20 Goldman Sachs Group Earnings $87.968 billion Profit $11.599 billion
21 Morgan Stanley Earnings $87.879 billion Profit $3.209 billion

To put their financial status in perspective look at the loss reported by GM and Ford. They both have reported $billion losses yet have not filed for bankruptcy protection. If GM can sustain a $38 billion loss and stay afloat why can’t the banks with $billion profits make it on their own without government money? The answer is securities fraud on a massive scale- to defraud the US people of $700 billion.

4 General Motors Earnings $182.347 billion losses $38.732 billion
7 Ford Motor Earnings $172.468 billion losses $2.723 billion

The banks that were in trouble will not receive US government help

30 Merrill Lynch Earnings $64.217 billion losses $7.777 billion
53 Fannie Mae Earnings $43.355 billion losses $2.050 billion
54 Freddie Mac Earnings $43.104 billion losses $3.094 billion

Georgia launched an unprovoked attack against the civilian population of South Ossetia. US armed Georgia killed Russian peace keepers and thousands of South Ossetia civilians before Russia moved troops in to protect its citizens and peace keepers.

If you thought George W Bush was a war monger wait and see who is elected (steals) the US presidential election. If Americans put McCain and Palin in office you should prepare for WWIII. McCain has a temper. When things don’t go his way he becomes very irrational and vindictive. He clearly is a Bush idealist. Americans know that George W Bush is a criminal. The US people know he waged illegal wars based on false accusations. The US people wanted George W Bush to end the wars years ago and yet we see McCain uttering the same Bush rhetoric against innocent Middle East states. We have McCain embracing Bush’s wars of aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq - neither of which had any hijackers in the September 11, 2001 attacks on the US. We have a former POW who endorses torturing POWs and civilians taken and held without evidence of a crime and without charge. We have a presidential candidate who has and continues to support Bush’s unprovoked wars of aggression We have a presidential and vice-presidential candidate advocating a war with nuclear Russia. Neither are elected yet they are talking of attacking Russia. That is not diplomacy. That is not leadership. That is insanity. That is suicidal. That is Nazism.

In an ABC report John McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin said that Georgia should join NATO and war might be necessary if Russia tried to defend the people of South Ossetia again. She went on to say “we’ve got to keep an eye on Russia. For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable.” Excuse me for noticing but isn’t that exactly what George W Bush did? The US invaded smaller defenseless countries. The US attacks against Afghanistan and Iraq were unprovoked. The US attacks and occupations are unacceptable and unlawful. For Palin to plan to attack Russia for something they have not done is reckless, stupid and insane. Need we remind Palin that Russia has 5200 nuclear warheads. Russia has nuclear armed submarines deployed within striking distance of the US. Russia has nuclear ballistic missiles that can reach any of the 262 major US cities. Russia has long range supersonic bombers that can reach the US. Hitler believed he could attack and defeat Russia. He too was reckless. He too was insane. What makes McCain and Palin think that the US could attack Russia and not expect Russia to defend itself and fight back? If Bush attacks Iran, both China and Russia have warned the US of the consequences. If the US under a McCain and Palin administration, directly attacks Russia what do you think would be the consequences?

As the 2008 presidential election heads into its final week, the current president threw a political wild card on table late Friday, when he asked Attorney General Michael Mukasey to investigate the status of 200,000 Ohio voters. Bush’s request is clearly electoral fraud - illegal interference with the process of an election. Acts of fraud tend to involve affecting vote counts to bring about a desired election outcome, whether by increasing the vote share of the favored candidate, depressing the vote share of the rival candidates, or both.

George W. Bush’s request, if honored, could be politically explosive. It would remind voters of the Department of Justice’s partisan abuses of power in the scandal surrounding the firing of seven U.S. attorneys in 2006 who did not deliver ‘voter fraud’ convictions.

It could be a big distraction, drawing attention away from issues that call for legitimate DOJ intervention, such as shortages of voting machines in minority precincts in Virginia and Pennsylvania, compared to nearby white precincts. That disparity would violate existing civil rights law.

Or it could interject a complicating dynamic into the already heavily litigated Ohio general election, by adding the Department’s weight to GOP legal claims that pre-emptively question the legitimacy of a close vote count in a key battleground state.

Either way, the Department must choose if it will remain silent or get involved in an action that would go well beyond its historic role of quietly monitoring elections and avoiding messages to voters.

“This is taking the politicization of this to a new level, and the last thing we need is for the elections officials and voters of Ohio to be put in a chaotic situation in the last days before the election,” Jon Greenbaum of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, told the Washington Post, reacting to the White House request.

The White House, according to the same Post report, described its actions as a routine referral to a federal agency as requested by a member of Congress, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH). Boehner had written to Mukasey early last week but received no response.

The Obama campaign reaction was to send the fourth letter this month to Mukasey urging he ensure the Department does not interfere “to satisfy desperate partisan political demands.”

“For the Department now, in response to the intense politics of the moment, to abruptly intercede in the current work of state and local officials would inflict incalculable damage — further and irreparable damage — to your office and to the reputation of senior federal law enforcement,” said Robert Bauer, Obama campaign counsel.

Using data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, the ACLU has determined that nearly 2/3 of the entire US population (197.4 million people) live within 100 miles of the US land and coastal borders.

The government is assuming extraordinary powers to stop and search individuals within this zone. This is not just about the border: This ” Constitution-Free Zone” includes most of the nation’s largest metropolitan areas.

U.S. “Constitution Free Zone” Map

* Normally under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the American people are not generally subject to random and arbitrary stops and searches.
* The border, however, has always been an exception. There, the longstanding view is that the normal rules do not apply. For example the authorities do not need a warrant or probable cause to conduct a “routine search.”
* But what is “the border”? According to the government, it is a 100-mile wide strip that wraps around the “external boundary” of the United States.
* As a result of this claimed authority, individuals who are far away from the border, American citizens traveling from one place in America to another, are being stopped and harassed in ways that our Constitution does not permit.
* Border Patrol has been setting up checkpoints inland — on highways in states such as California, Texas and Arizona, and at ferry terminals in Washington State. Typically, the agents ask drivers and passengers about their citizenship. Unfortunately, our courts so far have permitted these kinds of checkpoints – legally speaking, they are “administrative” stops that are permitted only for the specific purpose of protecting the nation’s borders. They cannot become general drug-search or other law enforcement efforts.
* However, these stops by Border Patrol agents are not remaining confined to that border security purpose. On the roads of California and elsewhere in the nation – places far removed from the actual border – agents are stopping, interrogating, and searching Americans on an everyday basis with absolutely no suspicion of wrongdoing.
* The bottom line is that the extraordinary authorities that the government possesses at the border are spilling into regular American streets.

We Are Under Martial Law! As Declared By The Speaker Last Night!

Bush said that if the Senate did not pass the unpopular $700 billion Wall Street bailout bill, he will consider declaring martial law.

“I have decided that I may have to be the decider in this decision,” Bush decided to tell reporters at the White House. “Democracy has so far failed to pass this important legislation, so a decision deciding in favor of it may be decided by me.”

Bush threatened he would invoke Executive Order 66, which will prevent Congress from making any more decisions by leaving the deciding up to him. It will activate martial law and eliminate all public elections. Shares of Halliburton Corp. went up on the news.

“The American populace needs strong leadership to get this bailout law in place, because profits are at stake here,” Bush declared. “And without profits, the country cannot move forward and stand on its own. The alternative to this only choice will not be successful. We must never mind the furthermore, to plead this is common sense.”

Most Americans are opposed to bailing out Wall Street, despite the Bush’s dire warnings about the consequences of doing nothing. Many disgusted Americans are planning to drop out of the economic system altogether if the bailout bill passes.

“Why should I work hard only to have my money confiscated and given to rich people on Wall Street?” asked Larry Johnson, a factory worker in Detroit, Michigan. “Screw it. If this bailout passes, I’m going to go live with the Amish. I’ll grow my own food, make my own clothes and give up electricity and hot water. No more credit cards. No more taxes to pay.”

Bush, who is aware that Americans are leaning toward a less modern and less slave-like existence, warned them against leaving America’s corporate-controlled economic system.

“Collectivating on farms and living peaceably without debt might seem like the answer, but it isn’t,” he said. “That’s socialism, and it will fail. That’s why I urge my fellow Americans to support the Wall Street bailout package with their tax money, so we can preserve our free markets and capitalism.”

Ninety-eight percent of all companies in the United States have less than 100 employees. Twenty-seven million firms fall into the category of small business, and small businesses employ 56 percent of our nation’s population. These companies are responsible for over 90 percent of the new jobs, over 90 percent of U.S. exports and over 90 percent of innovation in American business. Congress realized America’s small businesses were the heart and soul of our nation’s economy when they passed the Small Business Act in 1953.

Our nation is in the midst of one of the most dramatic economic downturns in modern history. More than ever, America’s 27 million small businesses need the economic benefits the Small Business Act was designed to provide.

None of this seems to matter to President George W. Bush. Although President Bush regularly panders to small businesses in his speeches, his policies paint a different picture. At the same time that President Bush backed the $700 billion dollar Wall Street bailout, he continued to dismantle existing federal programs designed to assist American small businesses.

During his two terms, President Bush has systematically dismantled each and every program established under the Small Business Act to assist American small businesses, especially those firms owned by women, minorities and veterans.

President Bush’s anti-small business policies began during his first week as president. The first thing he did to dismantle America’s small business programs was to remove the Administrator of the Small Business Administration (SBA) from the President’s Cabinet. Then he began to cut the SBA’s budget and staffing more than any other federal agency.

Since 2003, over a dozen federal investigations have been released, which have all found rampant and government-wide fraud, abuse, loopholes and a blatant lack of proper oversight in federal small business contracting programs. Several of the investigations found that the Bush Administration has diverted billions of dollars in federal small business contracts to many of the largest corporations in the world.

Current federal law requires that a minimum of 23 percent of the total value of all federal contracts and subcontracts be awarded to small businesses. However, every year the federal government awards billions of dollars in small business contracts to some of the largest corporations in the U.S. and Europe.

Report 5-15 from the SBA Office of Inspector General states, “One of the most important challenges facing the SBA and the entire Federal Government today is that large businesses are receiving small business procurement awards and agencies are receiving credit for these awards.”

Several Bush officials have privately acknowledged that at least 50 percent of all federal small business contracts or about $70 billion a year actually go to corporate giants. Based on information obtained in a series of successful Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits filed against the Bush Administration, the American Small Business League (ASBL) estimates legitimate small businesses are being cheated out of over $100 billion each year.

Last year, the Bush Administration adopted a policy that will allow Fortune 500 firms to continue to receive government small business contracts until 2012.

Bush officials recently began to dismantle one of the government’s only programs to assist minority-owned firms, the Small Disadvantaged Business contracting program.

Senator McCain has never objected to any of the Bush Administration’s anti-small business policies. During more than two years of campaigning, not once has Senator McCain mentioned his intention to restore America’s small business programs. If Senator John McCain is elected president, he will likely finish what Bush started and completely dismantle all federal programs designed to assist American small businesses.

Links: New SBA Policy Lets Miscoded Small Business Contracts Continue Until 2012/

Latest GSA Small Business Contracting Numbers Include Billions to Fortune 500 Corporations

Denver International Airport, located in Denver, Colorado some miles northeast of the city center, is physically the largest airport in the United States of America and the largest public works project in American history, covering an area of 53 square miles. Its construction cost nearly five billion dollars, financed by bond issues.

The United States and Russia sent their top military officers to the Helsinki capital Tuesday for an unannounced meeting. The meeting was arranged with great secrecy and was the first time that Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had met his counterpart, General Nikolai Makarov, since the Russian was appointed chief of the General Staff this summer.

It has been reported that the American Generals have stated their ‘firm belief’ that the United States and Europe are under an ‘imminent threat’ for large scale attacks by nuclear weapons prior to the US elections, due to be held on November 4th, that will completely destroy both America and the European Union in a bid to establish upon both these Nations a new ‘Forth Reich’ modeled upon the former German Nazi Empire.

Russian Military Analysts state in these reports that the fascist forces currently in power in both the United States and European Union already have in place all of the necessary laws and private paramilitary forces needed to accomplish such an astounding coup of virtually the entire Western World.

This new ‘Forth Reich’, these reports continue, is planned to ruled from the ‘new’ Western capital cities of Denver, Colorado and Vienna, Austria as Washington D.C. and nearly all of Europe’s main capitol cities will be destroyed in this planned attack.

Russian Military and Political Forces have been on ‘high alert’ over the planned destruction of the United States by those factions within it who see that their days are numbered but will not allow their most guarded secrets to ever be revealed to their citizens, even to the extreme of aligning themselves with dissident European factions currently engaged in the destruction of the entire Global financial system.

Top international military officials meet in Adirondacks.

This meeting between the United States and Russia’s top Military Officials followed an equally unprecedented meeting held also this past weekend in the Adirondack Mountain Region of New York State between these US Generals and all of the top Military Officers and Staff of Britain, France, Australia, New Zealand, Italy, Japan, Canada, Denmark, The Netherlands and South Korea.

Continuity of Operation Planning/ Continuity of Government

For years there has been a buzz about the billions of dollars cost overrun and strange goings on at the Denver International Airport (l5 billion dollars over budget). Rumors have it (by the original builders and contractors, airport personnel) that massive tunnels have been built underneath the airport that actually crisscross into New Mexico and the Rocky Mtns.

It has been suggested that it is part of the existing plan to build structures that will house l00,000 people in case of apocalypse. The Denver Airport is part of this plan.

The main points of such a plan (Continuity of Operation Planning/ Continuity of Government) in the United States are to suspend certain parts of the United States Constitution and to allow the alternative use of federal land and buildings (including use as internment camps) by FEMA for the housing/detention of US citizens as required, as well as any rescue/recovery operations. It also allows for power in the US to be centralized to the White House and “appointment of military commanders to run state and local governments and declaration of martial law.

All windows on one side of JP Morgan Chase building in Houston (owned by Rafik Hariri, the Lebanese billionaire and former Lebanese prime minister who was assassinated 14 February 2005 in a bomb explosion in Beruit Lebanon) were blown out during Hurricane Ike. Symbolic of things to come and perhaps the reason why JP Morgan was placed in charge of $540 billion - Is weather the new weapon for hostile takeovers

The Federal Reserve will take an extra $540 billion in tax payers funds to give to their own. The Federal Reserve is a privately owned company, not a branch of the US Government

JPMorgan Chase & Co. one of the partners that own the Federal Reserve will run five special units that will buy up to $600 billion of certificates of deposit, bank notes and commercial paper with a remaining maturity of 90 days or less. The Fed will provide up to $540 billion, with the remaining $60 billion coming from counterfeit paper issued by the five units to the money-market funds selling their assets, central bank officials told reporters on a conference call. The money will simply be printed for pennies on the dollar and the privately owned Federal Reserve will bill the American people for the full value. What the Federal Reserve is and has been doing is counterfeiting legal tender and laundering it through the US government.

The Private (alias Federal) Reserve owners are;

1. Rothschild Bank of London
2. Warburg Bank of Hamburg
3. Rothschild Bank of Berlin
4. Lehman Brothers of New York - allowed to go bankrupt in order to get $700 billion bailout. Was used as deception. Was necessary for Bush administration’s 9/11 economic attack against the US where private banks are the enemy.
5. Lazard Brothers of Paris
6. Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
7. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
8. Goldman, Sachs of New York - Sole beneficiary of the $700 billion Bailout. Conflict of Interest is being ignored by the FBI and SEC. Bush appointed Secretary Treasurer Henry Paulson has $700 million in shares in Goldman Sachs and will no doubt be reinstated as CEO in a little over 2 months.
9. Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
10. Chase Manhattan Bank of New York - The bank was known as Chase Manhattan Bank until it merged with JPMorgan in 2000. The Federal Reserve rewarding itself with US tax dollars.

Court Rules Federal Reserve is Privately Owned
Lewis v. United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (1982)

Federal reserve banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of a Federal Tort Claims Act, but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations in light of fact that direct supervision and control of each bank is exercised by board of directors, federal reserve banks, though heavily regulated, are locally controlled by their member banks, banks are listed neither as “wholly owned” government corporations nor as “mixed ownership” corporations; federal reserve banks receive no appropriated funds from Congress and the banks are empowered to sue and be sued in their own names. .

No one seems to notice and realize that the Bush administration is robbing the American people. They are stealing as much as they can before Bush, Cheney, Rice, Paulson, Gates and their co-conspirators leave office. In 2 months the American people will be handed over the massive debt that the Bush administration racketeered.

rack·et·eer - A person who commits crimes such as extortion, loansharking, bribery, and obstruction of justice in furtherance of illegal business activities.

History of Counterfeiting
The counterfeiting of money is one of the oldest crimes in history. At some periods in early history, it was considered treasonous and was punishable by death.

During the American Revolution, the British counterfeited U.S. currency in such large amounts that the Continental currency soon became worthless. “Not worth a Continental” became a popular expression that is still heard today.

During the Civil War, one-third to one-half of the currency in circulation was counterfeit. At that time, approximately 1,600 state banks designed and printed their own bills. Each bill carried a different design, making it difficult to detect counterfeit bills from the 7,000 varieties of real bills.

A national currency was adopted in 1862 to resolve the counterfeiting problem. However, the national currency was soon counterfeited and circulated so extensively that it became necessary to take enforcement measures. Therefore, on July 5, 1865, the United States Secret Service was established to suppress the wide-spread counterfeiting of this nation’s currency.

The Secret Service had exclusive jurisdiction for investigations involving the counterfeiting of United States obligations and securities. This authority to investigate counterfeiting is derived from Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 3056. Some of the counterfeited United States obligations and securities commonly dealt with by the Secret Service include U.S. currency and coins; U.S. Treasury checks; Department of Agriculture food coupons and U.S. postage stamps

US Code
TITLE 18 > PART II > CHAPTER 203 > § 3056

§ 3056. Powers, authorities, and duties of United States Secret Service

(a) Under the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security, the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect the following persons:
(1) The President, the Vice President (or other officer next in the order of succession to the Office of President), the President-elect, and the Vice President-elect.
(2) The immediate families of those individuals listed in paragraph (1).
(3) Former Presidents and their spouses for their lifetimes,

(g) The United States Secret Service shall be maintained as a distinct entity within the Department of Homeland Security and shall not be merged with any other Department function. No personnel and operational elements of the United States Secret Service shall report to an individual other than the Director of the United States Secret Service, who shall report directly to the Secretary of Homeland Security without being required to report through any other official of the Department.

Bush wanted the Secret Service controlled and today they answer to the Department of Homeland Security or DHS (modern day Gestapo). “The United States Secret Service shall be maintained as a distinct entity within the Department of Homeland Security and shall not be merged with any other Department function.” No longer is their role to counter counterfeiting - they now are controlled exclusively by the DHS. The DHS was formed with the passing of the un-Patriot Act (similar to the Nazi Enabling Act and the formation of the Gestapo - the official secret police of Nazi Germany.)

Gestapo (gə-stä’pō) - The German internal security police as organized under the Nazi regime, known for its terrorist methods directed against those suspected of treason or questionable loyalty. It ruthlessly suppressed opposition to the Nazis in Germany and occupied Europe and sent Jews and others to concentration camps.

Department of Homeland Security - George W. Bush established the Department of Homeland Security. The aims of the department were to undertake anti-American measures, directed against those accused of questionable loyalty - arrested without evidence and held without charge. DHS suppresses opposition to the Bush Regime in the US and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan where the resistance to the unlawful wars of aggression and occupation of their country are sent to concentration camps in Cuba and tortured to death for daring to defend their country and countrymen from the brutal US attacks.

Paulson owns some 4.58 million shares in Goldman Sachs (including restricted stock) worth about $700 million at today’s price .

The real intent of the Bush-Paulson bailout is unfolding. Economists already stated that the $700 billion bailout would not help the financial crisis unless the government addressed the real issues that got the US into the mess in the first place. It would seem that it’s business as usual as the Bush administration is starting to hand out free bonuses to banks connected to or who endorsed his presidency. Already $70 billion has been “given” to firms such as Goldman Sachs and Citigroup as bonuses to executives. There is a clear conflict of interest as treasure Secretary Paulson was once CEO (and probably still is) of Goldman Sachs and Goldman Sachs was the first to receive $billions in bonuses. The first priority was to fix the financial crisis yet here they are handing out $billions in US tax dollars to firms who haven’t even indicated that they would have to seek bankruptcy protection because of bad debts.

“When Congress placed restrictions on excessive executive pay, it had no intention of permitting business as usual with respect to bonus structures,” Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) said. “It would add insult to injury to ask taxpayers not only to bailout a firm, but to pay for bonuses as well. The Guardian’s report necessitates an immediate inquiry.”

The FBI is investigating four Wall Street institutions at the heart of the financial crisis over their role in the sub-prime mortgage meltdown. Reports said preliminary investigations into potential corporate fraud at the US mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the insurer American International Group and the investment bank Lehman Brothers had been opened.

They are among 26 companies being scrutinised by the FBI. Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and AIG were bailed out by the government , while Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy. Senior executives at the companies are also believed to be in the FBI’s sights, while the securities and exchange commission is also reportedly assessing possible civil fraud claims against the four firms.

The FBI have demanded information from Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and - prior to its collapse - Bear Stearns. Because Henry Paulson is “acting” Treasure Secretary and CEO of Goldman Sachs, Goldman Sachs may have been granted immunity from the FBI investigations into their role in the subprime mortgage scheme.


The first misconception that most people have is that the Federal Reserve Bank is a branch of the US government. IT IS NOT. THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IS A PRIVATE COMPANY. Most people believe it is as American as the Constitution. THE FACT IS THE CONSTITUTION FORBIDS IT’S EXISTENCE. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution states that Congress shall have the power to create money and regulate the value thereof, NOT A BUNCH OF INTERNATIONAL BANKERS!

The Federal Reserve Bank creates money from nothing, and loans it back to us through banks, and charges interest on our currency. The FED also buys Government debt with money printed on a printing press and charges U.S. taxpayers interest. Many Congressmen and Presidents say this is fraud. Who actually owns the Federal Reserve Central Banks? The ownership of the 12 Central banks, a very well kept secret, has been revealed: 1. Rothschild Bank of London 2. Warburg Bank of Hamburg 3. Rothschild Bank of Berlin 4. Lehman Brothers of New York 5. Lazard Brothers of Paris 6. Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York 7. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy 8. Goldman, Sachs of New York 9. Warburg Bank of Amsterdam 10. Chase Manhattan Bank of New York.

How did it happen? After previous attempts to push the Federal Reserve Act through Congress, a group of bankers funded and staffed Woodrow Wilson’s campaign for President. He had committed to sign this act. In 1913, a Senator, Nelson Aldrich, maternal grandfather to the Rockefellers, pushed the Federal Reserve Act through Congress just before Christmas when much of Congress was on vacation. When elected, Wilson passed the FED. Later, Wilson remorsefully replied, referring to the FED, “I have unwittingly ruined my country”. Now the banks financially back sympathetic candidates. Not surprisingly, most of these candidates are elected.

Merrill Lynch & Co.’s chief executive, for example, has raised more than $500,000 for McCain’s campaign. Obama has received at least $1.5 million collected by three senior executives at Lehman Brothers.

Three executives from Goldman Sachs Group Inc. have raised at least half a million dollars for Obama. That firm is Obama’s top source of campaign money overall; its employees have contributed more than $690,000 to his campaign, according to the center.

Merrill Lynch’s chief executive, John Thain, has raised more than $500,000 for McCain. Merrill’s workforce likewise is McCain’s top donor, giving nearly $300,000.

Separately, employees from the commercial bank and insurance sectors gave McCain’s campaign $3.6 million and Obama’s campaign $3.4 million.

Henry Paulson’s Goldman Sachs is the larger of the nation’s two remaining major independent investment banks. The other is Morgan Stanley, where employees have contributed $300,000 to Obama and $217,000 to McCain.

Not a bad investment for Goldman Sachs, Merill Lynch and Morgan Stanley. How can you go wrong by contributing a $million or more to campaign contributions and receive in return $billions. The US Congress didn’t pass the bailout bill to help you they did it because they were paid to pass it by their financial backers like Goldman Sachs, Merill Lynch and Morgan Stanley. Isn’t that the same thing as the banks US Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 11 > § 201 Bribery of public officials and witnessesBribery of public officials and witnesses?

Vincent Bugliosi is an American attorney and author, best known for prosecuting Charles Manson and other defendants accused of the Tate-LaBianca murders. His most recent books are “Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy” (2007), and “The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder” (2008).

Vincent Bugliosi, “With respect to the position I take about the crimes of George Bush, I want to state at the outset that my motivation is not political. Although I’ve been a longtime Democrat (primarily because, unless there is some very compelling reason to be otherwise, I am always for “the little guy”), my political orientation is not rigid. For instance, I supported John McCain’s run for the presidency in 2000. More to the point, whether I’m giving a final summation to the jury or writing one of my true crime books, credibility has always meant everything to me. Therefore, my only master and my only mistress are the facts and objectivity. I have no others. This is why I can give you, the reader, a 100 percent guarantee that if a Democratic president had done what Bush did, I would be writing the same, identical piece you are about to read.”

US Code
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 51 > § 1111

§ 1111. Murder

(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing; or committed in the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, escape, murder, kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage, aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse, child abuse, burglary, or robbery; or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or torture against a child or children; or perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree.
Any other murder is murder in the second degree.
(b) Within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States,
Whoever is guilty of murder in the first degree shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for life;
Whoever is guilty of murder in the second degree, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life.
(c) For purposes of this section—
(1) the term “assault” has the same meaning as given that term in section 113;
(2) the term “child” means a person who has not attained the age of 18 years and is—
(A) under the perpetrator’s care or control; or
(B) at least six years younger than the perpetrator;
(3) the term “child abuse” means intentionally or knowingly causing death or serious bodily injury to a child;
(4) the term “pattern or practice of assault or torture” means assault or torture engaged in on at least two occasions;
(5) the term “serious bodily injury” has the meaning set forth in section 1365; and
(6) the term “torture” means conduct, whether or not committed under the color of law, that otherwise satisfies the definition set forth in section 2340 (1).

lib·er·ate - to release (a country) from enemy occupation
oc·cu·pa·tion - Invasion, conquest, and control of a nation or territory by foreign armed forces
re·sis·tance - An underground organization engaged in a struggle for national liberation in a country under military or totalitarian occupation.

What is a terrorist?
US Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > § 2331
(1) the term “international terrorism” means activities that—
(A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping;

Section 212(a)(3)(B) of the INA defines “terrorist activity” to mean: “any activity which is unlawful under the laws of the place where it is committed (or which, if committed in the United States, would be unlawful under the laws of the United States or any State) and which involves any of the following:

(I) The highjacking or sabotage of any conveyance (including an aircraft, vessel, or vehicle).

(II) The seizing or detaining, and threatening to kill, injure, or continue to detain, another individual in order to compel a third person (including a governmental organization) to do or abstain from doing any act as an explicit or implicit condition for the release of the individual seized or detained.

(III) A violent attack upon an internationally protected person (as defined in section 1116(b)(4) of title 18, United States Code) or upon the liberty of such a person.

(IV) An assassination.

(V) The use of any
(a) biological agent, chemical agent, or nuclear weapon or device, or
(b) explosive, firearm, or other weapon or dangerous device (other than for mere personal monetary gain), with intent to endanger, directly or indirectly, the safety of one or more individuals or to cause substantial damage to property.

(VI) A threat, attempt, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.”

US Code
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 51 > § 1116

§ 1116. Murder or manslaughter of foreign officials, official guests, or internationally protected persons

(a) Whoever kills or attempts to kill a foreign official, official guest, or internationally protected person shall be punished as provided under sections 1111, 1112, and 1113 of this title.
(b) For the purposes of this section:
(1) “Family” includes (a) a spouse, parent, brother or sister, child, or person to whom the foreign official or internationally protected person stands in loco parentis, or (b) any other person living in his household and related to the foreign official or internationally protected person by blood or marriage.
(2) “Foreign government” means the government of a foreign country, irrespective of recognition by the United States.
(3) “Foreign official” means—
(A) a Chief of State or the political equivalent, President, Vice President, Prime Minister, Ambassador, Foreign Minister, or other officer of Cabinet rank or above of a foreign government or the chief executive officer of an international organization, or any person who has previously served in such capacity, and any member of his family, while in the United States; and
(B) any person of a foreign nationality who is duly notified to the United States as an officer or employee of a foreign government or international organization, and who is in the United States on official business, and any member of his family whose presence in the United States is in connection with the presence of such officer or employee.

No that you know what terrorism is, as defined by the United States own laws, how can you not see who the real terrorists are? According to US law the actions taken by this Bush Administration against foreign states, foreign officials and internationally protected person are all acts of terrorism. They have committed violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State. Their violent acts against Iraq and Afghanistan are intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; and to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping. Every one held by the US in secret jails around the World, in Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib are held illegally as US law clearly defines terrorism as “seizing or detaining, and threatening to kill, injure, or continue to detain, individuals in order to compel a third person (including a governmental organization) to do or abstain from doing any act as an explicit or implicit condition for the release of the individual seized or detained.” International terrorism is defined by the US as including the use of any biological agent, chemical agent, or nuclear weapon or device. US veterans has witnessed the US using chemical (white phosphorus) and nuclear weapons (depleted uranium shells are still classified as nuclear) on the civilian population in Al Fallujah Iraq. The US has made public threats against Iran which they clearly have made and continue to make plans for a nuclear attack against Iran if they do not comply with US political demands. The US nuclear use threat is clearly to affect the conduct of the Iran government by mass destruction, to intimidate or coerce Iran’s civilian population and to influence the policy of Iran’s government by intimidation or coercion.

US law clearly exposes the mass deception that is the US War on Terror. According to US law in regards to terrorism and what constitutes acts of terrorisms the Bush administration is guilty of terrorism by committing acts of terrorism against foreign states, foreign officials and internationally protected persons. The Bush administration, is defined by US law as terrorists engaging in acts of war of terrorism.

Professor Laurence Kotlikoff for the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis, a leading constituent of the US Federal Reserve said that, by some measures, the US is already bankrupt. “To paraphrase the Oxford English Dictionary, is the United States at the end of its resources, exhausted, stripped bare, destitute, bereft, wanting in property, or wrecked in consequence of failure to pay its creditors,” he asked.

According to his central analysis, “the US government is, indeed, bankrupt, insofar as it will be unable to pay its creditors, who, in this context, are current and future generations to whom it has explicitly or implicitly promised future net payments of various kinds'’.

Prof Kotlikoff, who teaches at Boston University, says: “The proper way to consider a country’s solvency is to examine the lifetime fiscal burdens facing current and future generations. If these burdens exceed the resources of those generations, get close to doing so, or simply get so high as to preclude their full collection, the country’s policy will be unsustainable and can constitute or lead to national bankruptcy.

If investors lose confidence in the US’s future, and suspect the country may at some point allow inflation to erode away its debts, they may reduce their holdings of US Treasury bonds.

The administration of George W. Bush authorized the CIA to waterboard (torture) alleged Al-Qaeda suspects according to two secret memos issued in 2003 and 2004, the Washington Post reported on Wednesday.

For centuries, civilized countries have considered waterboarding, or simulated drowning, to be torture. The United States rightly condemned as war criminals Japanese soldiers who employed the technique against U.S. personnel during World War II. It prosecuted U.S. military officers who waterboarded prisoners at the turn of the 20th century. The practice, which causes its victims to feel that they are about to die, is unquestionably cruel. Every administration prior to this one has judged it to be prohibited by U.S. law and treaty obligations. It is incontestably a blot on the reputation of this country and a breach of the very values we claim to want to export to the rest of the world.

The administration says it has not used the technique for five years and claims to have used it only on alleged Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and POWs Abu Zubaida and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. The acknowledgment is an admission of guilt of war crimes. Any federal court that considered waterboarding would be likely to rule waterboarding as torture. The legality of abusive treatment depends on “the circumstances” only if the treatment falls short of torture, which is illegal in all instances. Waterboarding is, and always has been, torture.

Written by PAUL W KINCAID, Toronto, Ontario

Stephen Harper hasn’t got the message yet - Canadians don’t trust him with a majority government. NDP leader Jack Layton stated that a second Conservative minority government means “no party has a mandate to implement an agenda without agreement from the other parties.” Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe addressed supporters in Montreal on just how important it was for Canada not to give Harper a majority saying “Without the Bloc Québécois tonight, Mr. Harper would have formed a majority government.” Newfoundland said it best with “Anything But Conservative” appeal that worked by shutting out the Tories in the province. Canadians ‘voted to move our country forward,’ but with caution - still needs agreement from the other parties to implement any agenda. Looks like the NAU will just have to wait 4 more years or until Stephen Harper decides he’s not fit to be “Prime Minister” and kicks himself out of office - again. This past election clearly shows that Harper is weak on leadership. Weak because he has put himself above the needs of the country and the people. Harper had a minority government which he himself was always trying to defeat from day one. Finally he resorted to violating the Canada Elections Act by calling a year early election. The opposition didn’t decide to call an election. The people didn’t want another election and didn’t ask for an election. Harper’s minority government bypassed parliamentary rules and acted as if he had a majority government and declared himself incompetent (dysfunctional) to lead the nation. 62.37% of the people of Canada voted against Stephen Harper. That means “the majority” of Canadians have declared that Stephen Harper is incompetent to lead Canada with a majority. The majority of Canadians agreed with Harper, that he is dysfunctional. Had the opposition had a different leader the outcome would have been a change. Until the Liberals get a new leader then Canada has decided to keep Harper in office - on probation (remain at large in the community subject to conditions prescribed by a minority rule of law).

A reminder to Stephen Harper as he resumes his duties as Prime Minister of Canada with a minority under a parliamentary government.

Parliamentary governments are defined by an absence of clear separation between two key branches of government: the legislative branch, which is responsible for enacting laws, and the executive branch, which is responsible for implementing laws. In parliamentary governments, the executive branch is “fused with” and “dependent upon” the legislative branch.

In Canada’s parliamentary system, this interrelationship between the legislative and executive branches is expressed in several ways. First, key members of the executive, such as the Prime Minister and Cabinet, are usually drawn directly from the legislative branch. The Prime Minister, for example, is an elected member of the House of Commons. As such, s/he performs the dual functions of leading the government, as well as representing his/her riding as a regular member of the House of Commons.

Second, and more importantly, the executive branch is completely dependent upon the legislative branch for its authority. The Prime Minister and Cabinet cannot decide the direction of government or administer enacted laws if it does not enjoy the continual support of the majority of members in the House of Commons.


How to make hydrogen fuel from cold fission of salt water. FuelReducer’s Water for Fuel Project is almost a reality. For the past few weeks FuelReducer has been experimenting with salt water as a source of hydrogen fuel. FuelReducer has shown through YouTube videos how simple it is to split water (H2O) into hydrogen and oxygen gas. As sea water cannot be used as a source of drinking water why not use it as the most abundant source for hydrogen fuel. There are no environmental side effects and by using sea water as a source of hydrogen fuel then all the oil producing nations will have more fuel to sell to the World for decades longer. We already know that oil is not limitless. We all know a number of nations depend on selling their oil to their neighbors and allies for revenue so using other sources of fuel will allow those oil producing countries to continue to profit from oil sales much longer than now predicted. As global warming is apparently to blame for the rising of the sea levels then using sea water as a source of hydrogen fuel also addresses and provides a solution to slow and or stop the rise in sea levels that threaten to flood and damage our coastal properties.

You too can be a part of the future where salt water is used as a viable source of hydrogen fuel. You can invest in FuelReducer so that their technology can be put on the market much sooner than later. FuelReducer is not a threat to oil producing nations. FuelReducer will help those nations self-sustain themselves for decades or centuries longer than is now possible with today’s very high demand for their black gold.

Has anyone asked where is Vice-president Dick Cheney? It is very unlike Cheney not to appear and put his now devalued 2 cents in. You would think that with the US economic crisis everyone in the White House would go on record, publicly, to offer encouragement and advise as to how to fix it. After all Cheney is still CEO of Haliburton. Where is Cheney? Has he been the first to be arrested for the crimes committed by the Bush Administration?

Frustrated that elected officials have refused to introduce articles of impeachment in defiance of their constituents’ demands, the people of Brattelboro, Vermont voted to direct town officials to draw up indictment papers against George Bush and Dick Cheney for violating their oath of office.

The Brattleboro vote took place during the Tuesday’s Vermont primary election. Bush supporters launched a major campaign to discredit the referendum resolution and the organizers. Yet the resolution passed by a vote of 2012 in favor to 1795 against.

“Shall the Selectboard instruct the Town Attorney to draft indictments against President Bush and Vice President Cheney for crimes against our Constitution, and publish said indictments for consideration by other authorities and shall it be the law of the Town of Brattleboro that the Brattleboro Police, pursuant to the above-mentioned indictments, arrest and detain George Bush and Richard Cheney in Brattleboro if they are not duly impeached, and prosecute or extradite them to other authorities that may reasonably contend to prosecute them?” The people of Brattleboro answered, “yes!”

The indictment means that Bush and Cheney can be arrested for criminal acts should they ever enter Brattleboro. The indictment would go into effect after Bush and Cheney leave office.

The Bush administration threatened to declare martial law if Congress did not pass Bush and Paulson’s bailout scheme that only benefits banks who support his presidency. Rep. Brad Sherman spoke in the House that Congress was threatened with the declaration of Martial Law if they did not vote to pass the bill. No law enforcement agencies are even investigating such unlawful intimidation by the Bush administration. It would appear that martial law has already been secretly declared by George W Bush. How else would you explain the inaction by the FBI or Justice Department. This bill is not legal because coercion was used to obtain federal funding. Congress was threatened. The people were threatened with martial law with Bush as dictator. The Bush administration has grossly abused their power. The US Constitution has been violated. As American citizens it is your duty to defend your country and your way of life by resisting the criminals who have taken the White House by criminals means. It is you duty to defend the US Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic. It is time to take back what is rightfully yours. Police offices and law enforcement agents who are still loyal and duty bound to uphold the law, it is now time for you to do your jobs and arrest these anti-democracy, anti-Constitution and anti-American criminals. The US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. Isn’t it time to stand up and defend your country and fellow countrymen from the enemy within.

There are 2 solutions to end the US economic crisis. They can be implemented with no added costs to the US people. The US economic crisis was brought on by debt.

Solution 1 - Cancel the NAFTA treaty. To cancel NAFA means jobs stay in the US, the economy will boom as US citizens will be employed and have income to pay their debts and purchase new items for their homes. To cancel NAFTA means a stronger US dollar.

Solution 2 - End the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The wars are bleeding the US dry. Neither Iraq or Afghanistan had anything to do with the attacks of September 11, 2001. Neither Iraq or Afghanistan had any citizens involved in the hijackings of US airlines. Neither country used or threatened to use military forces to attack the US. There was no threat from Iraq or Afghanistan. $Trillions are wasted on an immoral, illegal, unjustified and unending wars against the civilian population of Iraq and Afghanistan. Every 6 months George W Bush goes to Congress asking for $Billions for these wars.

“Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes … known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few.… No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.” — James Madison

The Washington-based Congressional Research Service estimate $2 billion per week to $12 billion a month is being spent just on the Iraq war. These figures do not included funding for the Pentagon or private security forces that now outnumber the US troops occupying Iraq.
The number of U.S.-paid private contractors in Iraq now exceeds that of American combat troops. More than 180,000 civilians — including Americans, foreigners and Iraqis — are working in Iraq under U.S. contracts, according to State and Defense Department figures - all employed in Iraq by U.S. tax dollars.

Iraq War Results & Statistics at October 1, 2008
4,178 US Soldiers Killed, 30,680 Seriously Wounded

War-Spending - About $600 billion of US taxpayers’ funds. In June 2008, Bush signed a bill approving about 200 billion more for 2008, which brings the cumulative total to close to $800 billion.

U.S. Monthly Spending in Iraq - $12 billion in 2008

U.S. Spending per Second - $5,000 in 2008 (per Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on May 5, 2008)

Cost of deploying one U.S. soldier for one year in Iraq - $390,000 (Congressional Research Service)


The blame for all this crisis falls to George W Bush. The World should have known that if Bush failed at every business endeavour he undertook then he most likely would fail as president of the United States of America. Every decision he has ever made has resulted in failure. It amazes me that after suffering one failure after another the US people haven’t fired this
incompetent SOB.

The US Declaration of Independence states

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. … But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

The Constitution of the United States of America

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Article VI

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

Presidential Oaths of Office

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

The United Nation Charter (a treaty signed by the US)

Article 2
The Organization and its Members, in pursuit of the Purposes stated in Article
1, shall act in accordance with the following Principles.

   1. The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of
all its Members.

   2. All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.

   3. All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.

   4. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

US Code
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 118 > § 2441
§ 2441. War crimes

(a) Offense.— Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.

(b) Circumstances.— The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such war crime or the victim of such war crime is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act).

(c) Definition.— As used in this section the term “war crime” means any conduct—
(1) defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party;
(2) prohibited by Article 23, 25, 27, or 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed 18 October 1907;
(3) which constitutes a grave breach of common Article 3 (as defined in subsection (d)) when committed in the context of and in association with an armed conflict not of an international character; or
(4) of a person who, in relation to an armed conflict and contrary to the provisions of the Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices as amended at Geneva on 3 May 1996 (Protocol II as amended on 3 May 1996), when the United States is a party to such Protocol, willfully kills or causes serious injury to civilians.

A war of aggression is a military conflict waged in the absence of “a necessity of self-defense, instant, overwhelming, leaving no choice of means, and no moment of deliberation.” Waging such a war of aggression is a crime under the customary international law.

In 1950, the Nuremberg Tribunal defined Crimes against Peace, in Principle 6, specifically Principle VI(a), submitted to the United Nations General Assembly, as:

    (i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
    (ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

During the trial, the chief American prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson, stated:

    To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

“Guantánamo was designed as a law-free zone, a place where the government could do whatever it wanted without having to worry about whether it was legal,” said Jonathan Freiman, an attorney with the Lowenstein Clinic at Yale. “It didn’t take long for that sort of lawlessness to be brought home to our own country. Who knows how much further America would have gone if the Supreme Court hadn’t stepped in to stop incommunicado detentions in 2004?”

War crimes are “violations of the laws or customs of war”, including but not limited to “murder, the ill-treatment or deportation of civilian residents of an occupied territory to slave labor camps”, “the murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war”, the killing of hostages, “the wanton destruction of cities, towns and villages, and any devastation not justified by military necessity”

According to an explosive 437-page report released by the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG), FBI agents assigned to the U.S. prison camp in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, compiled what they dubbed a “war crimes” file documenting prisoner abuse and torture by U.S. military and intelligence personnel.

The OIG report on the role of the FBI in observing or participating in prisoner abuse was compiled from a survey of several hundred field level agents and supervisors. FBI protests over these practices traveled up the chain of command and reached the White House–where they were ignored.

Documenting the widespread abuse and torture of detainees by CIA, Pentagon and “private” contractors in the employ of the U.S. Government, the file was initiated in 2002, but was ordered shut down by high level officials at the Bureau and the White House. FBI agents were ordered to stop keeping records of the criminal acts they had witnessed, The New York Times reports.

According to Eric Lichtblau and Scott Shane,

The report says that the F.B.I. agents took their concerns to higher-ups, but that their concerns often fell on deaf ears: officials at senior levels at the F.B.I., the Justice Department, the Defense Department and the National Security Council were all made aware of the F.B.I. agents’ complaints, but little appears to have been done as a result. (”Report Details Dissent on Guantánamo Tactics,” The New York Times, May 23, 2008)

Indeed, rather than shutting down the criminal CIA/Pentagon operation at Guantánamo, these sordid practices were exported to Iraq when Camp Delta commander, Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller was ordered by Pentagon officials to “Gitmoize” Abu Ghraib prison.

Back in 1992, the Government started using Threats Intimidation and Coercion to make Banks give Mortgages to people who were unable to get them, and should not have been getting Mortgages because of being too much of a risk. This is Over Regulation for the Socialist goal of “Affordable Housing”.

The Government used Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac as candy to get banks to make these risky loans. Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac are unconstitutional Socialist Institutions where the Government uses the future labor of Taxpayers, and their children, as Surety for Mortgages. Using Taxpayers as surety for loans puts the Taxpayers in a position of Involuntary Servitude, a violation of the 13th Amendment. The easy availability of mortgages and increased buyer demand caused the market to respond with higher housing prices which were based on an unrealistic ability to pay. A Housing Bubble was created.

The Socialists’ attempt to make housing more “affordable”, actually made the prices go up. As usual, the Socialist “Solution” to the problem actually made the problem worse.

These sub-prime loans were given a good credit rating by the Government because the Taxpayer is being USED to guarantee the loans. The CEOs of Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac used these Socialist Institutions to make big contributions to Socialist Politicians. Of course these paid unscrupulous Freedom Stealing Socialist Politicians were more than willing to turn a blind eye as the corruption at Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac hit epic proportions.

Did you know that Mr. George W. Bush has a Socialist person named Paulson, as head of the treasury? This person has the bright idea that the Taxpayers should be forced to be on the hook for all of the “Bad Paper” out there. It doesn’t seem to occur to this person that eliminating the over regulation of Sarbaines would solve most of the problem by allowing this “Bad Paper” to actually be seen for the good paper that it is. The Socialist Paulson probably doesn’t want to get out of this mess without a Government Takeover, because if the Government can buy all of this “Bad Paper” and wait for things to level out, the mark to market rules that caused the problem will allow it to be worth up to 2.2 Trillion dollars, which they can use for more Socialist Government Handouts that Democrats use to bribe people to vote for them.

Nothing is more greedy than Big Government. First the Government creates Regulations which causes a Wall Street Fire Sale, then they pick up the “Bad Paper” for pennies on the dollar to later sell it at a profit. Instead of these securities being in the Private Sector where the securities would help people build their retirement funds via investment, thousands of people lose some or all of their investments as the Government FORCES a Takeover of these securities. A massive transfer of wealth out of your retirement and other funds, to the Government.

If Americans had cared enough about our Freedom to tell the Government that they are not allowed to violate our God Given 13th Amendment Right against Involuntary Servitude, the Welfare State and this whole problem could have been avoided.


Karzai was a member of the Mujahideen (later renamed al Qaeda by the US) and took active part in driving the Soviets out of Afghanistan during the Soviet invasion in the 1980s. The Mujahideen were secretly supplied and funded by the United States, and Karzai was a top contact for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) at the time. He had close personal contact with CIA Director William Casey and George H. W. Bush, who was Vice President of the United States under Ronald Reagan.

When the Taliban emerged in the 1990s, Karzai was at first one of their supporters but later he broke with them and refused to serve as their U.N. ambassador. He lived in exile in Quetta, in Pakistan where he worked to reinstate the Afghan king, Zahir Shah. His father, Abdul Ahad Karzai, was assassinated on July 14, 1999 by the CIA who immediately claimed it was the Taliban . The US killing of his father gained a much needed ally for when the Bush administration was to take power and begin their war of terror. Karzai swore revenge against the Taliban by working with the US to help overthrow them.

In the months following the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, Mujahideen(al Qaeda) loyal to the Northern Alliance and other groups worked with the U.S. military to overthrow the legitimate Taliban government and muster support for a new government (coup)in Afghanistan. In October 2001, Hamid Karzai and his al Qaeda fighters survived an American “friendly fire” missile attack in southern Afghanistan. The group received injuries and were treated in the United States, Karzai received injuries to his facial nerves as can be noticed sometimes during his speeches.

In December 2001, political leaders gathered in Germany to agree on new anti-democratic leadership structures. Under the December 5 Bonn Agreement they formed an interim Transitional Administration and illegally installed Karzai Chairman of a 29-member governing committee. He was illegally sworn-in as leader on December 22. The Loya Jirga of June 13, 2002, appointed Karzai Interim holder of the new position as President of the Afghan Transitional (Traitors) Administration.

On September 20, 2006 Karzai told the United Nations General Assembly that Afghanistan has become the “worst victim” of terrorism. Never mind that he participated in aiding and abetting a foreign country in the overthrow of the legitimate government of Afghanistan, personally directed US military attacks against his own country killing his own countrymen, and continues to claim the presidency of Afghanistan whilst Afghanistan is under military occupation by a foreign state. Using the military of a foreign country to attack, destroy and kill your own country and people is by far the worse act of terrorism against your own. The people are the victims of Hamid Karzai’s betrayal. Hamid Karzai would be swiftly judged by the people of Afghanistan if and when the US ends their unlawful war of aggression and withdraws their troops from Afghanistan.

The war in Afghanistan will never be won because the fact is the US, aided by Hamid Karzai, unlawfully attacked a sovereign foreign state and removed the leadership in a coup. There are no opposing army, navy or air force in Afghanistan. There are only true patriotic Afghan citizens defending their country and countrymen through armed resistance against the unlawful attacks and occupation of their country by the US - Just as the French people did when Hitler attacked and occupied their country in WWII

O Canada!
Our home and native land!
True patriot love in all thy sons command.

With glowing hearts we see thee rise,
The True North strong and free!

From far and wide,
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.

God keep our land glorious and free!
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.

O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.

Illegally minted Amero Coin ready for Harper majority

The signs are very clear. Even the US Treasury are reporting that the bailout has done nothing to stall the fall of the US economy. It is now believed that the US dollar will crash sending the US into a major depression, far worse than the Great Depression. The bailout is only a payout to those who supported the Bush administration. Now that the US is ready to collapse and Bush is on his way out the Bush war mongers are taking US tax dollars and running. Some still believe that things can go as planned for by the Bush administration. The purpose of the unending and very costly wars is to bankrupt the US in favor of a North American Union with US corporate giants in control of Canada’s abundant natural resources and fresh water supply. No Canadian wants to be a part of the US. Canadians are more than happy to do business with our US neighbors but for Canada’s and Canadians benefit. There are a few in Canada who are Americans disguised as Canadians. One such American holds the title of Prime Minister. Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s only goal is obtain a majority government. Once he gets a majority government his first order of business is to hand over Canada to the US. The US government is holding off the collapse of the US dollar until Stephen Harper gets the needed majority. As soon as Harper gets a majority he and Bush will declare that they are forming the North American Union. They will sell their treasonous acts as the only solution to the US and World economic crisis. The Amero has already been illegally minted by the Bush Administration in Denver. They are waiting for Canada to have a Stephen Harper majority. With a Harper majority government, economically very strong Canada will cease to exist. No longer will there be a Canada. No longer will there be the RCMP as they will be immediately disbanded. The Canadian flag will be banned. Canada will be under US occupation as thousands of US soldiers and police will pour into Canada to protect Harper and the new North American Union. Anyone who opposes the NAU will be rounded up and jailed as terrorists. Politicians, police officers, soldiers, reporters, teachers and pro-Canadians who oppose the NAU will be kidnapped from their homes, businesses and off the streets by US mercenary armies like Black Water. The whole purpose for the Canadian gun registry was not to protect Canadians from criminals it was solely to have a gun registry of where all the guns are so that when Harper betrays Canada they can be confiscated before they can be used against US soldiers and police entering Canada in its illegal occupation of the sovereign country of Canada.


With no end in sight to the Iraq war and Congress borrowing hundreds of billions to pay for the war wouldn’t it be better for the US economy for the US Congress to stop funding the war? The answer to the US economic crisis wasn’t to throw $700 billion into something with absolutely no return. $700 billion would have been better spent on creating new jobs which automatically snowballs into people with new jobs buying new homes and all the things that go into the purchase of a new home - a boost in the economy. The bailout did nothing to stop the crisis. The bailout only added more debt to the US economy which is why the US is in an economic crisis in the first place. If the US government had infused $700 billion into immediate creation of new jobs the market would have reacted positively. A strong economy is only strong when the people are employed. Employment brings confidence back to the market. The retailers know that if people are employed they will buy. Unemployed can’t afford to buy anything but the necessities. It would be more logical and practical to declare that the war is over and allow the troops to return home to their families. At the beginning of the conflict in 2003, the Bush administration gave Congress a cost estimate of $60 billion to $100 billion for the entirety of the war. Congress is still pouring in $billions into the war with no end in sight. Bush said, “We’re not leaving [Iraq] so long as I’m the president.” That statement clearly states that no matter how many lives are lost, no matter how much it cost, not even if there is no threat, Bush intends on wasting lives and money by continuing his unnecessary and unjustified war (illegal too - then United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, declared explicitly that the US-led war on Iraq was illegal. Mr Annan said that the invasion was not sanctioned by the UN security council or in accordance with the UN’s founding charter) .

US Constitution
Section 8

Powers of Congress

The Congress shall have Power To;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

James Madison, the fourth President of the United States (1809–1817), and one of the Founding Fathers of the United States warned the people of the United States of America about these days in history; “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.'’

The legislation to bail out financial institutions contains a decidedly dictatorial twist. Section 8 relates to review of the Secretary of the Treasury’s decisions. It reads as follows:

“Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.”

Bottom line, there is no review of the Secretary’s decisions. This essentially makes him the USA’s financial dictator. Read the whole proposal. The Secretary may issue regulations, enter into contracts, disperse funds, and designate financial agents of the government at his discretion, not subject to review! This delegation of legislative power to the executive branch is contrary to the letter and spirit of the Constitution, and violates the principle of the separation of powers.

Sec. 12. Definitions.

For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:

(1) Mortgage-Related Assets.–The term “mortgage-related assets” means residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case was originated or issued on or before September 17, 2008.

All residential or commercial assets owned by the people of the United States of America can now be taken by the Treasury at any time and used for any reason. Not only has the people been tricked into paying for the worthless bad debts of financial corporate giants but now Bush has swindled (to obtain money or property by fraud or deceit) the peoples’ current valued assets and all future valued assets.

Swindle proposed by Bank of America in February 2008

It was back in February 2008 that Bank of America proposed creating a Federal Homeowner Preservation Corporation that would buy up billions of dollars in troubled mortgages at a deep discount, forgive debt above the current market value of the homes and use federal loan guarantees to refinance the borrowers at lower rates.

“We believe that any intervention by the federal government will be acceptable only if it is not perceived as a bailout of the bond market,” The bailout is just that a bailout of th bond market but sold to the public as a bailout of default mortgages held by the people. Nowhere in this bailout does it help the people with their mortgages or credit debts.

The House fiscal 2009 budget, which passed last March 2008, raises the borrowing authority of the United States from $9.815 trillion to $10.2 trillion, an increase of $385 billion dollars. The Senate, passing its own version of the 2009 budget, did not raise the federal borrowing authority, but does expect to spend $3 trillion, with a projected deficit from $340 to $366 billion. Some estimate that the Treasury Department will hit the $9.815 debt ceiling limit shortly after the November elections, which will be no surprise to anyone. The national debt ceiling is a debt limit set by Congress beyond which the national debt cannot be exceeded. At any given time there is a debt ceiling in effect. Whereas Congress once approved legislation for every debt issuance, the growth of government fiscal operations in the 20th century made this impractical. The Treasury was granted authority by the Congress to issue such debt as was needed to fund government operations as long as the total debt did not exceed a stated ceiling.

The Outstanding Public Debt as of 04 Oct 2008 is now $10,153,832,866,360.48. Adding the $1 Trillion bailout to this (which is by the way is illegal as it exceeds the US debt ceiling) makes the US national debt $11,153,832,866,360.48. The government does not have the authority to payout the $1 Trillion bailout. The bailout exceeds the debt ceiling. The bailout is actually contributing to the economic collapse of the United States. The estimated population of the United States is 304,846,244 so each citizen’s share of this debt is $33,308.05. In comparison when Bush took office, the national debt stood at $5.7 trillion. He has doubled the national debt making him the worse leader in US history. The main reason for the debt crisis in the US is the unwarranted, unjustified and illegal wars of aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq.

Whoever is elected (or whoever rigs the election) to the White House in November will inherit an economic meltdown, but it doesn’t really matter, as the media-elected main candidates wouldn’t change any of the policies of the Bush administration anyway. In fact, they may become far worse. And don’t look to the democrats in the House and Senate to put up more than a whisper in protest.

Instead, it falls to the American people to dictate the course the nation will take by electing well-informed constitutionalists to office to replace the assorted “compassionate conservatives” and outright socialists who, being in office now, are driving the nation into the ground.

US Bailout puts the United States under emergency economic rule

Oct 3, 2008 - WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT), Chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, today released the following statement after the House of Representatives passed and the President signed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act:

“I commend Chairman Frank, Speaker Pelosi, and Congressmen Emanuel, Boehner and Blunt for their contributions to this bipartisan, bicameral effort.

“Section 101 (a)(1) establishes what is termed the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to which substantial portions of what the American people currently owe to their banks and financial institutions is to be turned over the US Government for redistribution to foreign banks.

Section 101(c)(3) Designates for the first time in American history these foreign banks as financial agents of Federal Government with full law enforcement authority over the citizens in the US.

Section 3 (b) allows the US Secretary of the Treasury to put any kind of debt, including credit card, home loans, personal loans, automobile loans, etc., into the TARP programme.

Section 112 allows the US Secretary of the Treasury to astoundingly extend financing to foreign banks to purchase the debt of the American people.

Section 112 (1)(a) allows the US Government to hold stocks in companies for the first time in their history and which completely destroys the capitalist economy of their Nation.

Section 119 (2)(a) gives the US Secretary of the Treasury dictatorial powers not reviewable by courts making this position the most powerful one in America.

Section 122 increases the US public debt to the incredible amount of $11,315,000,000,000 (Trillion)

Section 204 puts the United States under emergency economic rule and states, “all provisions of this Act are designated as an emergency requirement and necessary to meet emergency needs”.

There is a parallel between what is happening today with the US government giving $1 Trillion to the financial sector and the massive insider trading that took place just prior to the Bush September 11 2001 attacks against the US. The only difference this time is that the government is robbing the people in the open instead of in secret prior to 2001. The agenda is the same, make as much money as possible before a Bush administration pre-planned attack can be executed against the US. The new 9/11 will divert the attention of the people and the criminal investigation agencies from the criminal activity that has taken place with this bogus financial bailout to engaging in more wars against more innocent countries.

A former Reagan official has issued a public warning that the Bush administration is preparing to orchestrate a staged terrorist attack in the United States, transform the country into a dictatorship and launch a war with Iran.

Paul Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, blasted a new Executive Order, released July 17, 2007, allowing the White House to seize the assets of anyone who interferes with its Iraq policies and giving the government expanded police powers to exercise control in the country.

Roberts, who spoke on the Thom Hartmann radio program, said: “When Bush exercises this authority [under the new Executive Order], there’s no check to it. So it really is a form of total, absolute, one-man rule.”

“The American people don’t really understand the danger that they face,” Roberts said, adding that the so-called neoconservatives intended to use a renewal of the fight against terrorism to rally the American people around the fading Republican Party.

Republicans like Roberts have become increasingly disenchanted with the neoconservative politics of the Bush administration, which they see as a betrayal of fundamental conservative values.

Criminal Insider Trading prior to the 9/11 attacks

Although uniformly ignored by the mainstream U.S. media, there is abundant and clear evidence that a number of transactions in financial markets indicated specific (criminal) foreknowledge of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. In the case of at least one of these trades — which has left a $2.5 million prize unclaimed — the firm used to place the “put options” on United Airlines stock was, until 1998, managed by the man who is now in the number three Executive Director position at the Central Intelligence Agency.

It is necessary to look at the insider trading information that is being ignored by Reuters, The New York Times and other mass media.

It is necessary to understand only two key financial terms to understand the significance of these trades, “selling short” and “put options”.

“Selling Short” is the borrowing of stock, selling it at current market prices, but not being required to actually produce the stock for some time. If the stock falls precipitously after the short contract is entered, the seller can then fulfill the contract by buying the stock after the price has fallen and complete the contract at the pre-crash price. These contracts often have a window of as long as four months.

“Put Options,” are contracts giving the buyer the option to sell stocks at a later date. Purchased at nominal prices of, for example, $1.00 per share, they are sold in blocks of 100 shares. If exercised, they give the holder the option of selling selected stocks at a future date at a price set when the contract is issued. Thus, for an investment of $10,000 it might be possible to tie up 10,000 shares of United or American Airlines at $100 per share, and the seller of the option is then obligated to buy them if the option is executed. If the stock has fallen to $50 when the contract matures, the holder of the option can purchase the shares for $50 and immediately sell them for $100 – regardless of where the market then stands. A call option is the reverse of a put option, which is, in effect, a derivatives bet that the stock price will go up.

A September 21 story by the Israeli Herzliyya International Policy Institute for Counterterrorism, entitled “Black Tuesday: The World’s Largest Insider Trading Scam?” documented the following trades connected to the September 11 attacks:

- Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options… Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these “insiders” would have profited by almost $5 million.

- On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. Again, there was no news at that point to justify this imbalance;… Again, assuming that 4,000 of these options trades represent “insiders,” they would represent a gain of about $4 million.

- The levels of put options purchased above were more than six times higher than normal.

- No similar trading in other airlines occurred on the Chicago exchange in the days immediately preceding Black Tuesday.

- Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., which occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Center, saw 2,157 of its October $45 put options bought in the three trading days before Black Tuesday; this compares to an average of 27 contracts per day before September 6. Morgan Stanley’s share price fell from $48.90 to $42.50 in the aftermath of the attacks. Assuming that 2,000 of these options contracts were bought based upon knowledge of the approaching attacks, their purchasers could have profited by at least $1.2 million. Merrill Lynch & Co., with headquarters near the Twin Towers, saw 12,215 October $45 put options bought in the four trading days before the attacks; the previous average volume in those shares had been 252 contracts per day [a 1200% increase!]. When trading resumed, Merrill’s shares fell from $46.88 to $41.50; assuming that 11,000 option contracts were bought by “insiders,” their profit would have been about $5.5 million.

The bailout proposed to buy worthless financial debts has now ballooned to over $1 Trillion with the addition of vote buying packages. Yes the bailout has grown because in order to get the necessary votes to pass the Bush administration has resorted to bribery - paying for votes.

Who are the loser in all this. The people of the United States of America because this buyout does nothing to help them pay their mortgages and debts. This bailout actually increases their debt because they are the ones who will be paying for it in their personal income taxes.

Who are the winners;

The Bush family will receive $billions through Carlyle Group. This bailout will finance George W Bush’s next failed business venture.

Henry Paulson will receive nearly $1 billion from the bailout payout to his former employer Goldman Sachs - he will receive even more when he takes back his position as CEO of Goldman Sachs in 4 months.

Merrill Lynch for influencing the market with unjustified revising of ratings for public companies in order to present a false impression of economic doom.

Bank of America will receive several $100 billion as payment for coming up with the scheme to defraud the American people. Ordered newly acquired Merrill Lynch to engage in securities fraud in order to create fear in the market.

The American people don’t have to be the victims of this massive fraud. It is your right and duty to contact the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) if you believe you are a victim of this crime. It is the job of the FBI to investigate all criminal activity that affects the the United States. The American people can recover the entire amount illegally discharged to the financial sector when the FBI investigates charges of bribery and wire fraud.

Stephen Harper as special guest to US based The Council on Foreign Relations

Canadian Nationalist Mel Hurtig and others investigative researchers suggest that the Stephen Harper government has called the snap 2008 Federal Election, so that he can expedite the North American Union (NAU) agenda. What is that? The NAU is an apparent scheme to hand over Canada to the United States and its large private corporations. You might wonder, why the Canadian mass media is not covering this apparent agenda? Mel Hurtig and other researchers also reveal that the Canadian mass media has been taken over by U.S. interests and Canadian elites who support the NAU agenda. The NAU is in turn, an evolution of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). John Turner had observed that NAFTA was never about “Free Trade” but instead about enabling the take-over of Canada, by preventing the ability of Canadians to prevent the giving away of sectors of the Canadian economy to U.S. interests.

The Council on Foreign Relations is an organization whose mission is to redefine American policy and slide this republic into a one-world government – a nightmare beyond what most Americans can’t even imagine. Rear Adm. Chester Ward was a member of the CFR for 16 years and later warned the American people as to the true intentions of this treasonous operation:

The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common – they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world-banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government.

Former Congressman John R. Rarick warned:

The CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education and mass communication media, should be familiar to every American concerned with good government and with preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation’s right to know machinery – the news media – usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities.

The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high-level decisions for converting the United States from a sovereign constitutional republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship.

Lou Dobbs, CNN Anchor: Good evening, everybody. Tonight, an astonishing proposal to expand our borders to incorporate Mexico and Canada and simultaneously further diminish U.S. sovereignty. Have our political elites gone mad? We’ll have a special report. Blood … Now, incredibly, a panel sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations wants the United States to focus not on the defense of our own borders, but rather create what effectively would be a common border that includes Mexico and Canada.”

Do you want Canada stolen from you in this 2008 Federal Election? Educate yourself. Even in the US, US officials are warning their own people that a secret government has already recruited the leaders of all three countries that make up North America, including Stephen Harper, to bring about the North American Union. Harper endorses the dissolving of Canada - a treasonous act - in favor of the North American Union. What was he promised to get him to betray his own country? What was the price he settled on to willfully commit treason?

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid made the following comment:

“We don’t have a lot of leeway on time,” Reid told reporters in the Capitol. “One of the individuals in the caucus today talked about a major insurance company — a major insurance company — one with a name that everyone knows that’s on the verge of going bankrupt. That’s what this is all about.”

Sen. Reid’s staff later said they and Senator Reid have no idea which insurance company was being talked about.

By not naming the company they are clearly engaging in fear mongering to provoke an unwise, unethical and unsound payout of US taxpayers money to a few corporate giants with personal ties to Henry Paulson and the Bush family. It is the same tactic used by the Bush administration to get the vote they needed to make the Patriot Act law (more like anti patriot act as the Bush administration unjustifiably strips every American of their Rights to freedom - The Bill of Rights protects freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to keep and bear arms, the freedom of assembly, and the freedom to petition. It also prohibits unreasonable search and seizure, cruel and unusual punishment, and compelled self-incrimination. The Bill of Rights also prohibits Congress from making any law respecting establishment of religion and prohibits the federal government from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.) and declaration of war with Iraq (Saddam has weapons of mass destruction and Collen Powell shows up with a vial they claim is anthrax). Congress is quick to bow to fabricated threats by the Bush administration. The truth is the $700 billion bailout is not going to help the people of the United States of America. The bailout is a hand-out to greedy CEOs who are responsible for their own downfall. No investment broker would commit any money to a stock option with no value so why is the Bush administration quick to pour in $700 billion to buy zero value debt? The answer is simple fraud - In criminal law, fraud is the crime or offense of deliberately deceiving another in order to damage them – usually, to obtain property or services unjustly. Fraud can be accomplished through the aid of forged objects. In the criminal law of common law jurisdictions it may be called “theft by deception,” “larceny by trick,” “larceny by fraud and deception” or something similar.

One US company that would benefit from Bush’s fraud scheme is Merrill Lynch, which was acquired by Bank of America for $29 per share ($50 billion dollars) last month. Toronto’s benchmark stock index fell more than 600 points Thursday morning as big fertilizer stocks tanked and investors appeared to take little comfort from the U.S. Senate’s vote in favour of a Wall Street bailout. Saskatoon-based Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Inc., or PotashCorp, which calls itself the world’s largest fertilizer company, led the list of losers, falling more than $28, or about 21 per cent, to about $108.

Traders dumped the stocks after bailout benefactor and bankrupt Merrill Lynch had one of their analyst cut his rating on the sector from “buy” to “underperform,” citing weak prices and concern about future earnings . Bank of America is the largest commercial bank in the United States by market capitalization. It is a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. It too has a huge stake in Bush handout with its newly acquired Merrill Lynch. It would appear that Merrill Lynch may be resorting to securities fraud to help itself at insuring that the fraudulent bailout goes through - devaluing stock by revising its rating is one sure way of instilling fear. Do remember Merrill Lynch was involved in securities fraud between 2000 and 2002 involving another fraudulent rating scheme. In 2000 a number of relatively new Internet companies did their banking with Merrill Lynch, whose securities expert, Henry Blodget, gave these companies a high or “buy” rating (meaning it was a good time to buy these stocks), even when he knew they were in trouble and might fail. Trusting Blodget, many investors continued to follow his advice and buy stock in the companies. By 2001 several of the companies had failed and investors lost millions. New York attorney general Eliot Spitzer investigated and found emails written between other Merrill Lynch analysts describing Blodget’s recommended stocks as “junk,” and called them “disasters waiting to happen.” Spitzer even found company emails from Blodget himself calling the very stocks he continued to rate high to investors as junk. Merrill Lynch paid a settlement of $100 million to the State of New York on May 21, 2002. The SEC and other regulators added another $100 million. Henry Blodget was banned from the securities industry and fined $4 million dollars.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley may be among the biggest beneficiaries of the $700 billion U.S. plan to buy worthless assets from financial companies while many banks see limited aid, according to Bank of America Corp. But it was Bank of America Corp (Merrill Lynch) that devised this $700 billion scheme to defraud the people of the United States of America.

In February 2008 Bank of America proposed creating a Federal Homeowner Preservation Corporation that would buy up billions of dollars in troubled mortgages at a deep discount, forgive debt above the current market value of the homes and use federal loan guarantees to refinance the borrowers at lower rates.

We believe that any intervention by the federal government will be acceptable only if it is not perceived as a bailout of the bond market,” the financial institution noted in February 2008.

In practice, taxpayers would almost certainly view such a move as a bailout. If lawmakers and the Bush administration agreed to this step, it could be on a scale similar to the government’s $200 billion bailout of the savings and loan industry in the 1990s. The arguments against a bailout are powerful. It would mostly benefit banks and Wall Street firms that earned huge fees by packaging trillions of dollars in risky mortgages, often without documenting the incomes of borrowers and often turning a blind eye to clear fraud by borrowers or mortgage brokers.


No one has bothered to report the immense conflict of interest that the Treasury Secretary Henry Merritt “Hank” Paulson Jr. has in this rape deal for taxpayers. The Goldman Sachs golden boy stands to make millions off taxpayers’ wallets if the deal goes through. But help people facing foreclosure? No way.Here’s how a real bailout works: Goldman Sachs needs money, Warren Buffet gives them money. In return, Warren Buffet gets stock that pays a ten percent dividend. Within hours of revealing his dramatic, confidence-boosting investment in Goldman Sachs on September 24, 2008, Warren Buffett had made a $783 million (£424 million) notional profit.

Now, for comparison, here’s the shell game version.

(1) Goldman Sachs gives Hank Paulson seven hundred million dollars (that’s seven zero zero comma zero zero zero comma zero zero zero) in salary and bonuses.

(2) Goldman Sachs lends Hank Paulson to the Treasury (now that he can afford to be a public servant).

(3) As the Secretary of the Treasury, Paulson insists that we give Goldman Sachs a lot of money, in exchange for a lot of crap. (If not, we all die.)

(4) Except it’s not Hank Paulson’s money, it’s ours.

(5) If the crap turns out to be crap, we’re stuck with it. (And by the way: if it’s not crap, why are they so desperate to unload it?)

(6) In four months, Paulson returns to Goldman Sachs.

(7) Paulson receives salary and bonuses from the money we just gave to Paulson to give to Goldman Sachs to give to Paulson.

(8) It’s our money. Or was. But we don’t get preferred shares. We don’t get a ten percent dividend. We don’t even get a free copy of The Warren Buffet Way: Second Edition (Paperback). We get crap.

In essence: when Goldman Sachs needs money, and the guy lending the money is rich, they give him something for it. When Goldman Sachs needs money, and the guy lending the money is us, they don’t.

Canadians have been forced into an early election by Prime Minister Stephen Harper. A minority government doesn’t have the authority to call an early election yet that is exactly what Stephen Harper has done. Elections Canada Act 56.1 Election dates (2) Subject to subsection (1), each general election must be held on the third Monday of October in the fourth calendar year following polling day for the last general election, with the first general election after this section comes into force being held on Monday, October 19, 2009. Why would Stephen Harper call an early election knowing full well that he is violating the law - parliamentary law?

As stated in previous articles published on the agenda is for Stephen Harper to wipe Canada off the face of the map for the US controlled North American Union. The website makes it perfectly clear that Stephen Harper cannot be handed a majority government. If you are Canadian and intend on being Canadian for generations to come you can do your patriotic duty by not voting for Harper.

The NAFTA Amero Minted in Denver Ready to Replace The US Dollar Today

George W Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing the borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration’s true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the Bush is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled “Building a North American Community” published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration’s actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

How severe will the coming dollar collapse be?

“People in the U.S. are going to be hit hard,” Chapman warned. “In the severe recession we are entering now, Bush will argue that we have to form a North American Union to compete with the Euro.”

“Creating the amero,” Chapman explained, “will be presented to the American public as the administration’s solution for dollar recovery. In the process of creating the amero, the Bush administration just abandons the dollar.”

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” little noticed when Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment “to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security.” The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that “our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary.” Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

Analysts who have reconstructed money supply data after the Fed stopped publishing it argue a coming dollar collapse will set the stage for creating the amero as a North American currency to replace the dollar. The Bush administration has been trashing our country and our money in every way possible, such as with the war in Iraq and using overpriced contractors, all so that an illegal corporate currency can be implemented in place of the US Dollar.

The only way out is to cancel the NAFTA treaty. To cancel NAFA means jobs stay in the US, the economy will boom as US citizens will be employed and have income to pay their debts and purchase new items for their homes. To cancel NAFTA means a stronger US dollar.