Only the White House sees a threat from Iran. The White House is the only ones making threats to peace by starting another war and threatening to attack another country without provocation. The Bush / Cheney White House are the ones who have threatened to use nuclear weapons against another country - not Iran. The threat to the US national security is from the US own White House not any other country.

What will happen when George W Bush and his co-lunatic Dick Cheney gives the order to attack another innocent nation? To their surprise the US commanders might disobey the order for they know that they must obey only lawful orders. There are those who will follow orders only because of promises of advancement in their careers. There are more patriotic military commanders than there are self-serving power hungry yes men. If the US commanders abide by the US Constitution and obey the law of the land then there will be no attack. If the US commanders follow unlawful orders from the lunatics in the White House then they are party to war crimes, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity. If the order is given the US will have more enemies than they can ever imagine. The White House has already been warned that an attack on Iran would be considered an attack on Russia. Iran also has China and Venezuela as allies. If the order is given the US forces in the Middle East could be wiped out as the Arabs will put aside their differences and take up arms against a common enemy - especially if the US or Israel uses nuclear weapons against Iran. An attack on Iran would be suicide for the US. The US will be surrounded. There is a good probability that the Iraqi people will rise up and take advantage of the situation and attack the US troops in their country. Syria will be drawn into the war and will side with Iran against Israel and the US. China and Russia will mobilize in retaliation to a US unprovoked attack on Iran. The odds are stacked up against the US. The US cannot win a war where they are surrounded. The US can’t afford to allow George W Bush and Dick Cheney to attack Iran because it will surely be the end of the US.

The death of a visitor or any visitor to Canada needs special attention. We cannot simply let this recent incident go without making changes to our law enforcement system so that this does not happen again. This incident has tarnished our reputation as it was reported around the World. It was reported as it should have been. A visitor to this great country of ours was killed by our police officers.

First off the man who died as a result of being tasered was unarmed. He immediately recognized the police officers and appeared to have turned to assume the position for being taken into custody. There was no obvious indication that he was armed or that he threatened the officers with a weapon.

Secondly there were 4 officers who could have easily have overpowered this man as their training includes restraining a suspect. In their training the officer must be able to detain an individual by himself or herself. Again there were 4 officers so the taser was not required.

Lastly but most importantly the taser is an offensive weapon. It is a weapon that has already been banned by International treaties and laws. Our own laws also bans this type of weapon as it is recognized as a weapon used against civilians that inflicts torture and inhumane treatment. Torture and inhuman treatment (50,000 volts is inhumane treatment) are forbidden unconditionally, whether in time of peace or war, whether at the local police station or in the face of a major security threat. International human rights law contains no more basic prohibition than the absolute, unconditional ban on torture and what is known as “cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.” This death as a result of being subjected to a weapon of torture was avoidable. The officers in question broke the law, both national and international law, because they confronted an unarmed civilian and used a weapon of torture to get the man to comply. Because the unarmed man died as a result of their unlawful reaction to a controllable and contained situation (was already in a secured area with no other civilians present) the officers in question deserve more than just a reassignment. They killed an unarmed man. They fired lethal projectiles at an unarmed man who wasn’t resisting arrest or posing an immediate threat to others.

When a weapon causes just one death it is no longer a safe weapon for use in public - it is a lethal weapon - no less lethal than police issued sidearm that shoots bullets. The taser is a weapon. It looks like a firearm and it is a firearm because it fires projectiles that if aimed at another person can cause severe injury or as in this case, death. International law bans these types of weapons so why are we in Canada now defying the law in order to so-call uphold the law? The people being tasered to death by the police are not armed militants or gang members. They are tasering unarmed civilians which according to our laws and International laws is unlawful. Since when did we make exceptions to the rule of law that allows members of our democratic society to torture and kill another? Torture and inhuman treatment are forbidden unconditionally, whether in time of peace or war, whether at the local police station or in the face of a major security threat.

According to US and International law the CIA rendition program is unlawful. Not only does International Law clearly prohibit such practices but so does US law. The rendition program involves kidnapping, terror, torture and unlawful deportation, confinement or transfer. Any country and their citizens can and is authorized by law to use deadly force in self defense of kidnapping, assault and unlawful deportation, confinement or transfer. Protection of US immunity is only valid within the United States. The CIA operates by entering foreign countries illegally by covert insertion or deployment which makes every CIA operation in any country other than the United States illegal and its operatives are subject to the laws of the country infiltrated. US citizens are the only ones bound by US laws. No one, not the CIA operatives, George W Bush or Dick Cheney has immunity from torture and murder. No one is above the law. Murder and torture are both unlawful because sane and civilized societies do not inflict harm or kill other human beings. Murder and torture is an illness - Psychotic disorders. Any one who condones torture and willfully murders another are mentally insane, uncivilized and psychopathic . Psychopathy is as a condition characterized by lack of empathy or conscience, and poor impulse control or manipulative behaviors.

The CIA follows orders given by the president of the United States of America - presently George W Bush. Mr Bush’s orders are unlawful and a mirror reflection of his physiological state. To authorize and condone such inhuman acts against other human beings, including US citizens makes George W Bush unfit to hold the office of the president of the United States of America - he is a psychopath. The prototypical psychopath has deficits or deviances in several areas: interpersonal relationships, emotion, and self-control. Psychopaths lack a sense of guilt or remorse for any harm they may have caused others, instead rationalizing the behavior, blaming someone else, or denying it outright. Psychopaths also lack empathy towards others in general, resulting in tactlessness, insensitivity, and contemptuousness. All of this belies their tendency to make a good, likable first impression. Psychopaths have a superficial charm about them, enabled by their low self-consciousness, a willingness to say anything without concern for accuracy or truth. This extends into their pathological lying and willingness to con and manipulate others for personal gain or amusement. The prototypical psychopath’s emotions are described as a shallow affect, meaning their overall way of relating is characterized by mere displays of friendliness and other emotion for personal gain; the displayed emotion need not correlate with felt emotion, in other words. Shallow affect also describes the psychopath’s tendency for genuine emotion to be short lived and egocentric with an overall cold demeanor. Their behavior is impulsive and irresponsible

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 55 > § 1201
§ 1201. Kidnapping

(a) Whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or carries away and holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any person, except in the case of a minor by the parent thereof, when—
(1) the person is willfully transported in interstate or foreign commerce, regardless of whether the person was alive when transported across a State boundary if the person was alive when the transportation began;
(2) any such act against the person is done within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States;
(3) any such act against the person is done within the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States as defined in section 46501 of title 49;
(4) the person is a foreign official, an internationally protected person, or an official guest as those terms are defined in section 1116 (b) of this title; or
(5) the person is among those officers and employees described in section 1114 of this title and any such act against the person is done while the person is engaged in, or on account of, the performance of official duties,
shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life and, if the death of any person results, shall be punished by death or life imprisonment.

US Criminal Code
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 118 > 2441

2441. War crimes

(a) Offense.— Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.

(b) Circumstances.— The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such war crime or the victim of such war crime is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act).

(c) Definition.— As used in this section the term “war crime” means any conduct—
(1) defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party;
(2) prohibited by Article 23, 25, 27, or 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed 18 October 1907;
(3) which constitutes a violation of common Article 3 of the international conventions signed at Geneva, 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party and which deals with non-international armed conflict;

International Law
War Crimes

All crime done in war, concerning not soldiers, but unprotected civilians, specifically women and children, and old men, as proposed in 1926, not including old women

War crimes are defined in the statute that established the International Criminal Court, which includes: (red marks crimes committed by US and UK with enough public evidence to convict them of those crimes)

I. Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, such as:

1. Wilful killing, or causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health
2. Torture or inhumane treatment
3. Unlawful wanton destruction or appropriation of property
4. Forcing a prisoner of war to serve in the forces of a hostile power
5. Depriving a prisoner of war of a fair trial
6. Unlawful deportation, confinement or transfer
7. Taking hostages

II. The following acts as part of an international conflict:

1. Directing attacks against civilians
2. Directing attacks against humanitarian workers or UN peacekeepers
3. Killing a surrendered combatant
4. Misusing a flag of truce
5. Settlement of occupied territory
6. Deportation of inhabitants of occupied territory
7. Using poison weapons
8. Using civilian shields
9. Using child soldiers

Schizophrenia is a psychiatric diagnosis that describes a mental illness characterized by impairments in the perception or expression of reality, most commonly manifesting as auditory hallucinations, paranoid or bizarre delusions or disorganized speech and thinking in the context of significant social or occupational dysfunction.

A person experiencing schizophrenia may demonstrate symptoms such as disorganized thinking, auditory hallucinations, and delusions. In severe cases, the person may be largely mute, remain motionless in bizarre postures, or exhibit purposeless agitation; these are signs of catatonia.

Paranoid schizophrenia is a subtype of schizophrenia. People with paranoid schizophrenia hold untrue beliefs (delusions) or hear things others don’t hear (auditory hallucinations).

You be the judge. Bush and Cheney are the only ones who believe that Iran is building nuclear weapons. Despite evidence that disputes their claims - their own intelligence agencies and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) declaring no such work is being done or sought. If they are right and everyone is wrong then logic states that they - Bush and Cheney - are suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. The same by impairments in the perception or expression of reality was done to build a case for war against Iraq. Iraq had WMDs. Has any ever been found? No! Saddam was seeking to acquire nuclear weapons. Another delusions exposed by Valerie Plame’s husband Ambassador Joseph Wilson.

The biggest piece of evidence of a mental illness called paranoid schizophrenia came even before the 2000 presidential elections - “I feel like God wants me to run for President. I can’t explain it, but I sense my country is going to need me. Something is going to happen… I know it won’t be easy on me or my family, but God wants me to do it.” –George W. Bush commenting to Texas evangelist James Robinson in the run-up to his presidential campaign. Paranoid schizophrenia and the first sign of a psychopath emerging who is planning for things to come - 9/11.

“God told me to strike at al Qaeda and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam [Hussein], which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East. If you help me I will act, and if not, the elections will come and I will have to focus on them.” –Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Abu Mazen quoting Bush when they met in Aqaba;

“I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn’t do my job.” George W Bush, quoted in the Lancaster New Era, during a private meeting with an Amish group.

Disorganized speech is another characteristic of schizophrenia. Watch any speech or news conference given by George W Bush (the person may be largely mute, remain motionless in bizarre postures, or exhibit purposeless agitation). Most people have declared his to be just a babbling idiot. The correct diagnosis is that from day one, George W Bush has been suffering from schizophrenia and his disorganized speech is the sign. All the evidence for 9/11 clearly declare that Iraq, Afghanistan or Iran had nothing to do with the attacks of 9/11 yet Bush and Cheney perceived that they did and proceeded to attack and now occupy the countries that fit their delusions. Iran has made no threat to the US or any other country yet Bush and Cheney hold untrue beliefs (delusions). Both have made numerous strange statements like Iran is going to start WWIII by refusing to admit to their delusions. It is time to get these 2 the help they need before their actions cause more deaths and destruction.

Signs/Symptoms

Schizophrenia usually develops gradually, although onset can be sudden. Friends and family often notice the first changes before the victim does. Among the signs are:

* Confusion
* Inability to make decisions
* Hallucinations
* Changes in eating or sleeping habits, energy level, or weight
* Delusions
* Nervousness
* Strange statements or behavior
* Anger
* Indifference to the opinions of others
* A tendency to argue
* A conviction that you are better than others, or that people are out to get you

A Canadian owned and operated company called FuelReducer has developed and is now selling two devices that have proven fuel reduction results. The FuelReducer Pro is for cars and trucks and they have added 2 to 8 mpg to the fuel economy of the vehicles they have been installed on. They reduce the demand for fuel by 10 to 45%. The FuelEjector is for oil heating furnaces and it has saved from 190 to 221 liters of oil for the consumers. FuelReducer is presently working on a system that uses water as a fuel supply to heat your homes, cook your food, provide gas for your barbecues and even produce electricity by fueling generators. There is no shortage of fuel. If you want help in lowering your fuel costs check out FuelReducer’s website:

http://fuelreducer.com

The US military concentration camp in Guantánamo Bay “Cuba” is an illegal base. For two reasons. The first is that the land that the base sits on belongs to the Cuban people as it is within the sovereign nation of Cuba. The US claims to have full diplomatic right to the base and that their base is not a violation of sovereignty and illegal military occupation. Originally the U.S. government obtained a 99-year lease that began on February 23, 1903, from Tomás Estrada Palma, an American citizen, who became the first President of Cuba. From the very beginning the lease is non binding because an American citizen, not a Cuban, drew up the lease for the US without consent or authority by the Cuban people. Even if the lease were to be honored the 99 years has expired on February 23 2002. The US still claims to have a valid lease even though the lease has expired in 2002. They are basing their claim on a 1934 treaty that ratified the lease agreement. The 1934 treaty and ratification would not stand up in a US court of law. Why? Because Cuba is a sovereign state and US made laws, bills or leases don’t apply to any country including Cuba. The sovereign state of Cuba can, with full right and authority, cancel any lease or agreement made between Cuba and any foreign state, including the United States. They as well as any country can do so at their own discretion. Cuba is not a state of the United States. The US are only guests in Cuba as long as the Cuban people and their government allow the US to continue to be guests. Cuba has the right and full authority to deport any foreign national from their country. They have the right and full authority to evict, expel or demand the removal of any foreign representative, diplomat and military from their soil - again at their discretion. The treaty and lease were both nulled when Fidel Castro came to power in 1976. Castro can and has ordered the US to vacant the land on which the US military has built a base upon in Guantánamo Bay. Guantánamo Bay is still Cuban soil. Guantánamo Bay has never been made the 51st state of the United States of America. If the people and government of Cuba demand the US to leave their country the US must comply. International Laws protects the sovereignty of nations. The US pretense in Guantánamo Bay is an illegal occupation and violation of Cuba’s sovereignty.

The second reason why Guantánamo Bay is illegal has to do with a gross violation of International Law and the Geneva Convention. The US base illegally holds kidnapped “civilians” and battlefield POWs who were taken by the US government from countries around the World and unlawfully deported, confined or transfered to Guantánamo Bay. Under US, Canadian and International Law Guantánamo Bay is illegal. The US is bound by International Law especially since it was the US government which conducted the Nuremberg Trials which tried, convicted and put to death Germans for war crimes, crimes against the peace and crimes against humanity. It was the US which drafted and made into law the International Laws concerning war crimes - the same crimes the US is now committing 60 years later in Afghanistan and Iraq.

International Law
War Crimes

All crime done in war, concerning not soldiers, but unprotected civilians, specifically women and children, and old men, as proposed in 1926, not including old women

War crimes are defined in the statute that established the International Criminal Court, which includes:

I. Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, such as:

1. Wilful killing, or causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health
2. Torture or inhumane treatment
3. Unlawful wanton destruction or appropriation of property
4. Forcing a prisoner of war to serve in the forces of a hostile power
5. Depriving a prisoner of war of a fair trial
6. Unlawful deportation, confinement or transfer
7. Taking hostages

Under International Law in regards to War Crimes - under Grave breaches of the Geneva Convention Guantánamo Bay is in violation of no less than 3 gross violations of the law. Guantánamo Bay is guilty of Torture or human treatment, Depriving a prisoner of war of a fair trial, Unlawful deportation, confinement or transfer. The US drafted the Geneva Convention and the US enforced it to protect their own in the battle field. For decades the US forced the World to adhere to and abide by the Geneva Convention yet today they are the ones who are willfully and intentionally violating and denying the World the protection of the Geneva Convention. Guantánamo Bay is illegal and must be closed down. Even if you apply US law to Guantánamo Bay it is a gross violation of the US’s own laws. For that reason they unlawfully deport, confine, transfer, torture and deny a prisoner of war a fair trial in a country not the United States. By having such an illegal base in the foreign state of Cuba somehow gives them deny ability of such gross violations of the law. There is no immunity bestowed on any country or any leader for war crimes, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity. It does not matter if the US has a base in Timbuktu the US is still bound by law.

The US government knows that the base is illegal and the US people would hold them accountable if the base was located inside the United States. Despite what the Bush administration claims, his administration and the US is bound by International Law - it is after all a creation of the United States and has been duly enforced until George W Bush “took” the office of the president of the United States of America. Cuba has the right and full legal authority to evict the US from Cuban soil. Cuba is a sovereign nation. Sovereignty is the exclusive right to complete political (e.g. legislative, judicial, and/or executive) control over an area of governance, people, or oneself. A sovereign is the supreme lawmaking authority, subject to no other. In international law, sovereignty is the legitimate exercise of power and the interpretation of international law by a state. The United Nations’ Charter is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations. Therefore, it is the duty of the so-called United Nations to see to it that the sovereignty of Cuba is respected by demanding and if required forcing the US to withdrawal from Cuba. It is also the duty of every country to demand the closure of Guantánamo Bay because of the gross violations of the Geneva Convention.

No matter where you look on the Internet there are stories of the Bush administration preparing for war with Iran. There are even reports that the White House has purposely delayed an intelligence report on Iran because the report counters and nullifies the claims that Dick Cheney and George W Bush are making against Iran. Dick Cheney is determined to start a new war based entirely on his false accusations. The war would already have started a number of times this past year but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi botched the attack plan by making a trip to Syria in April of this year and Russian President Putin made an unsheduled trip to Iran on October 16, 2007.

Pelosi is the highest ranking U.S. official to go to Syria since former Secretary of State Colin Powell visited the nation in 2003. Defying the White House’s Middle East policy by meeting with Syrian President Bashar Assad, Pelosi said, “The road to Damascus is a road to peace.” Her visit stop the White House’s WWIII.

Then the Army Times reported that a B-52 bomber mistakenly loaded with six nuclear warheads flew from Minot Air Force Base, N.D., to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., on Aug. 30, resulting in an Air Force-wide investigation. The White House is the only one that can authorize a B52 bomber be loaded with nukes. The Air Force has stated that making a mistake of loading six nuclear warheads for transportation is impossible. There was no mistake. The vice-president wanted nukes to be shipped to the Middle East from Barksdale to be used against Iran. Military officers disobeyed an unlawful order from the White House and because they knew the order was illegal they refused to fly the nukes to the Middle East. To make sure that the US people knew what was happening they leaked it through the Army Times. The US military want no part in the White House’s thirst for starting a nuclear Armageddon. The military made sure that the illegal plans of the White House were exposed - to protect the US and other countries from the madness that is the Bush administration. The US military even went further by declaring that nukes are still unaccounted for.

The B52 bomber incident made headlines around the World but there is something you won’t hear from or read in the major news agency’s reporting. The entire flight crew and weapons crew involved in the B-52 incident are reported to be dead. Cause of death for the majority of military personnel in this major incident is traffic accidents. The White House didn’t want the US people to learn from these crew members what had actually transpired. An investigation would have collected all the facts through testimonies from these now deceased individuals. They would have confirmed that they knew that they were loading sophisticated nuclear cruise missiles onto a B-52 as per order from the White House. The denial ability case for the White House is only as strong as the weakest link. Someone would have fingered the White House.

There is a war going on inside the US and the US people don’t realize it. The US military is ready and prepared for war against the White House. Their mission is to protect the US from the insane people in the White House. They have already won one battle but the threat from the White House is still there. The US military has already told us that nukes are missing. The discrepancy in the report is their way of telling us that the White House stole a nuke and is preparing to use it in another 9/11 style attack against the US on US soil or use it against Iran. Two reports were made. Associated Press first reported 5 nukes were mistakenly loaded then someone from the Pentagon declared that 6 were actually loaded.

The whole World now knows that Bush and Cheney intend on attacking Iran. The Russian intelligence believe that they are going to use nukes against Iran or against the US and blame it on Iran. Even today, Memorial Day, Bush made new threats against the United States. He told veterans that a new attack was coming that paled in comparison to 9/11. Bush and Cheney have both threatened a WWIII. At a White House press conference George W Bush informed the American people that he had told world leaders “if you’re interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing [Iran] from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon.” The US people know that Iran has not threatened the US. Iran has not attacked the US. The White House, however, is making threats against Iran including threatening to use nuclear weapons against Iran. The US military is now well aware of who the real threat is. They know it is not Iran. They know, as does the entire World, that the White House fabricated a threat from Iraq - costing the US military over 73,000 deaths and over 1 million Iraqi “civilians” being slaughtered. The US military is not willing to be sacrificed for the amusement and financial benefit of the White House. Even Russia has warned that an attack against Iran would be an act of war against Russia. Putin knew the White House ordered an attack on Iran for October 16, 2007. Putin held a press conference whereby he informed the World that he was going to Iran on the same day that the US was to attack Iran. His highly publicized visit to Iran thwarted WWIII once again. Once the threat had passed he announced that Russia and Iran have made a alliance - warning the US White House that an attack on Iran would be an attack on Russia.

When someone in the US military obeys the White House’s unlawful order to begin the attack on Iran the entire 5th fleet will be destroyed. The White house is counting on this so that they can get the US people to back them in an all out war against Iran and other Middle East countries. What the White House is not counting on is the US going to war with them - not Iran. The US aren’t easily fooled. They know whats really going on. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. There is no way the White House is going to get away with fooling the US people twice. Even the US Congress knows their plan. On Friday Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) wrote to House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-MI) in support of H. Res 799, Articles of Impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney. In the letter he stated “I believe impeachment remains the only tool Congress has to prevent a war in Iran.” Looks to me like the US military and the US people are ready and willing to go to war against the White House. Who’s “the decider” now Mr George W Bush?

International arrest warrants are warranted for George W Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, Paul Wolfowitz, Condoleza Rice, Robert Gates and Tony Blair for war crimes, and crimes against Peace.The Bush administration’s planning for, preparing to and threats of war against Iran are defined as Crimes against peace. Their actions are not out of self defense they are a premeditated crime with intent to cause death and destruction within a foreign sovereign state. Their criminal intent is to violate the sovereignty of Iran in an unprovoked attack. Their criminal actions will no doubt result in the mass murder of innocent people. Their threats and planning of such criminal acts have long been recognized as unlawful by not only the US but also the entire World. The White House planning for an unprovoked attack against the sovereign nation of Iran is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

The Nuremberg Principles

In 1945, the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal defined three categories of crimes, including crimes against peace. This definition was first used by Finnish courts to prosecute the aggressors in the War-responsibility trials in Finland. The principles were later known as the Nuremberg Principles.

In 1950, the Nuremberg Tribunal defined Crimes against Peace (in Principle VI.a, submitted to the United Nations General Assembly) as

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

The United Nations Charter

The relevant provisions of the Charter of the United Nations mentioned in the RSICC article 5.2 were framed to include the Nuremberg Principles. The specific principle is Principle VI.a “Crimes against peace”, which was based on the provisions of the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal that was issued in 1945 and formed the basis for the post World War II war crime trials. The Charters provisions based on the Nuremberg Principle VI.a are:

Article 1:

The Purposes of the United Nations are:

1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;
2. To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;

Article 2, paragraph 4

All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

Article 33

The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall, first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice.

The Security Council shall, when it deems necessary, call upon the parties to settle their dispute by such means.

Article 39

The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.[1]

General Assembly Resolution 3314

On December 14, 1974, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 3314, which defined the crime of aggression. This definition makes a distinction between aggression (which “gives rise to international responsibility”) and war of aggression (which is “a crime against international peace”). Acts of aggression are defined as armed invasions or attacks, bombardments, blockades, armed violations of territory, permitting other states to use one’s own territory to perpetrate acts of aggression and the employment of armed irregulars or mercenaries to carry out acts of aggression. A war of aggression is a series of acts committed with a sustained intent. The definition’s distinction between an act of aggression and a war of aggression make it clear that not every act of aggression would constitute a crime against peace; only war of aggression does. States would nonetheless be held responsible for acts of aggression.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court lists the crime of aggression as one of the most serious crimes of concern to the international community, and provides that the crime falls within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Neither Canada nor any other country has any duty or obligation to remain in Afghanistan, fighting an unjust and unlawful war. Afghanistan’s current leader - imposed by the US does not have the interest of the Afghan people on his agenda. The war in Afghanistan is about rebuilding, but not what you might think. The war was planned and staged to rebuild the wiped out Opium drug trafficking industry. Afghanistan was not invaded to capture those responsible for the 9/11 attacks on the US it was to remove the government that had completely wiped out the drug trade. We were told that the mission is now to rebuild and to hunt down Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. All it takes is a little research into Congressional, CIA and FBI reports and you will find the same exact information reported here. The key to this unlawful war is drug trafficking, by some of the leaders in the United States government - past and present.

Hamid Karzai aided a foreign country in the overthrowing of the Afghan government - that makes him a traitor.

The Bush administration and their co-conspirator Hamid Karzai expecting the Taliban government to negotiate a truce and be given a seat in the US imposed government is nothing more than another attack against the victims of Bush’s war of aggression. Karzai is a traitor amongst the people of Afghanistan. He did not become leader by the will of the people he was installed by the invading country. Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9/11. Afghanistan was and still is a war of aggression by the Bush administration. This war of aggression is the most evil of all crimes and because Karzai helped in the invasion and destruction of his own country he too is guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Taliban and the Afghan people have every right to fight for their freedom from the unlawful occupation by the US and NATO forces. I know there are Canadians in Afghanistan but our government is also guilty of war crimes because they waged a war of aggression against the innocent country of Afghanistan. NATO is guilty of war crimes. It is time to end the excuses for justification for occupying a sovereign state with foreign troops. It is time for the US, Canada and NATO to leave Afghanistan. The people have the right to their freedom and sovereignty. They have the right to govern without any foreign interference or meddling and most of all military actions against them. If anyone helped a foreign country take over Canada they too would be traitors. In any country aiding and abetting the enemy is clearly an act of treason.

Image of Moon’s North Pole Area shot by the on board HDTV camera

Japan moved a step closer to sending someone to the moon by successfully launching the biggest lunar mission since the US Apollo program. The Selenological and Engineering Explorer — or SELENE, left its launchpad on Tanegashima island, 600 miles south-west of Tokyo, aboard an H-2A solid-fuel rocket. A live internet broadcast showed the rocket as it headed out over the Pacific before separating from the lunar explorer over Chile about 45 minutes later.

SELENE also carries a high-definition television camera to map the moon and shoot the Earth “rising” from the Moon’s horizon, footage of which will be sent back to Earth. Kaguya will orbit and map the moon for about a year until it runs out of fuel. Already the lunar probe has sent back High Definition images of both the Earth and the Moon. The images and updates can be seen by visiting mission control website

http://www.jaxa.jp/c … own/f13/index_e.html

I am restarting nbGazette. On this website I will be posting information and reports that other news medias refuse to print mainly because the media is controlled - in New Brunswick it is by the Irving family. There are a lot of things going on in New Brunswick and around the World that affect you and I but they are not being reported. There are things that are happening that are clearly a violation of the law and are not being reported. There are changes that have taken place that the vast majority of New Brunswickers and Canadians are not aware of and I will be posting everything as I come across them. You and I have the right to know about “everything” that is happening around us, as it affects us all. If our rights and liberties are being violated you have the right to know. If the government is spying on us you have the right to know. If our government has abused their authority you have a right to know. The government works for the people. No one has the right to be premier or prime minister. They are only in power so long as we allow them to be. They cannot be leaders without our majority vote. Even with a majority government the prime minister is bound by law and is accountable to the law. Anyone who works with a foreign state to undermine our sovereignty must be removed as their actions are treason. Anyone who works secretly and off-record cannot be trusted and must also be removed before irreversible damage can occur.

I am a New Brunswicker but I am also a proud Canadian and I will do whatever it takes to expose and bring to justice anyone who is a traitor to our great nation. When a foreign country like the United States is intercepting our emails and listening in on our conversations it is a gross breach of our sovereignty and a threat to our national security. I bring this up now because it is very important for every Canadian to know that a Canadian owned company is working with the US to facilitate the US spying on Canadians. I know for a fact that Rogers is diverting all our emails and Home Phone conversations to the US. Rogers has partnered with Yahoo (US owned) and all Rogers internet communications are being sent to Yahoo servers in California where this past summer the US Congress passed a law that allows the Department of Homeland Security and the NASA to read all foreign communications that passes through the US. The US has found a loophole in the law that would protect our privacy through reading of our emails and internet phone conversations by “diverting” all Rogers Canadian customers’ emails to the US. Before our email didn’t go to the US if the email recipient was another Canadian address. Before the emails went through Canadian network junctions to get to another Canadian destination. By having Rogers host their servers with Yahoo all emails are sent through the US and are stored on the US servers in California. According to US law those servers are subject to US law and as such they can be retrieved, opened and even deleted at the digression of the DHS and the NSA.

Every one subscribing to Rogers High Speed Internet and Home Phone are now subject to the FISA bill - Canadian emails can be read and conversations can be listened in on. Rogers High Speed Internet and Home Phone service that have servers in a foreign state – the US – undermines the safety and interest of Canada and Canadian. Having servers in the US allows for the US – a foreign state – uncontrolled access to Canadian Trade Secrets. This is a very serious threat to the safety, interest, prosperity and security of Canada because the US can now intercept, block, alter, steal or delete any and all Rogers email passing through the US via Rogers servers. That is everyone including lawyers, politicians, banks, police, military, newspapers, prime minister, premiers, CSIS and every Canadian citizen with Rogers Internet. The US Congress gave the Bush administration the authority to read Canadian emails and listen in on Home Phone conversations.

Reply from Rogers concerning emails being sent to the US:

Thank-you for your email. We strive to provide you with the highest
level of customer support, and hope we can be of assistance in
addressing your questions.

We understand your concern.

Rogers is a Canadian company; however, the Rogers Yahoo! Mail Servers
are shared with Yahoo!, a company located in California.

If you have any further questions or comments regarding our service,
please fill out the online form on our Customer Support page listed
below or contact us by phone at 1-888-288-4663.

Sincerely,
Gigi C.
Rogers Yahoo! Hi-Speed Internet
Electronic Support Group

Customer Support: http://help.yahoo.com/rogers
Email: internetsupport@rci.rogers.com

rogerscabletv@rci.rogers.com

The actions of Rogers is illegal. What is our government doing about it? Nothing. I’ve sent emails to the prime minister, the governor general and to all the leaders of the Canadian political parties and have had no reply. Apparently they are not too concerned that the US could be reading government communications - a threat to national security.

Offence of “Communicating a Trade Secret”

Every person commits an offence who, at the direction of, for the benefit of, or in association with, a foreign economic entity, fraudulently or without colour of right and to the detriment of Canada’s economic interests, international relations or national defence or national security,

(a) communicates a trade secret to another person, group or organisation; or

(b) obtains, retains, alters or destroys a trade secret.

Security of Information Act
Prejudice to the safety or interest of the State

3. (1) For the purposes of this Act, a purpose is prejudicial to the safety or interests of the State if a person

(a) commits, in Canada, an offence against the laws of Canada or a province that is punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of two years or more in order to advance a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause or to benefit a foreign entity or terrorist group;

(b) commits, inside or outside Canada, a terrorist activity;

(c) causes or aggravates an urgent and critical situation in Canada that

(i) endangers the lives, health or safety of Canadians, or

(ii) threatens the ability of the Government of Canada to preserve the sovereignty, security or territorial integrity of Canada;

(d) interferes with a service, facility, system or computer program, whether public or private, or its operation, in a manner that has significant adverse impact on the health, safety, security or economic or financial well-being of the people of Canada or the functioning of any government in Canada;

(i) impairs or threatens the capabilities of the Government of Canada in relation to security and intelligence;

(j) adversely affects the stability of the Canadian economy, the financial system or any financial market in Canada without reasonable economic or financial justification;

(k) impairs or threatens the capability of a government in Canada, or of the Bank of Canada, to protect against, or respond to, economic or financial threats or instability;

(l) impairs or threatens the capability of the Government of Canada to conduct diplomatic or consular relations, or conduct and manage international negotiations;

Canadian communications being diverted to servers in the US where they can be manipulated and abused by the US government to gain unauthorized financial, political, military or technology information is a threat to Canada’s sovereignty, prosperity and national security. Rogers is financially capable of having their servers in Canada. Why would they need to have servers in a foreign country if they have the people, technology and facilities here in Canada? Why would a Canadian company compromise our privacy and security? Is Rogers Canadian owned in name only? If so then a major breach of national security has occurred and our government must act immediately to protect Canada and Canadians.