slavery.jpg
Man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.” ~ JFK

The UN and the World Bank leader are pushing for a new currency. They are calling for a global currency. UN countries should agree on the creation of a global reserve bank to issue the currency and to monitor the national exchange rates of its members, the Geneva-based UN Conference on Trade and Development declared.

UN countries should not agree to such a scheme. No country should even contemplate even the idea of an anti-sovereignty, anti-democratic global currency. Just look at what the EU did to the European countries. The EU dictates the policies of every country that is a member of the EU - all in direct violation of each country’s territorial, political and economic sovereignty. How many of you know that the European Union was devised by the Nazi Party of Adolf Hitler. The concept of a unified Europe was the goal of Adolph Hitler.

Back in 1942, a book called “The European Community” was published. Its principal author, a Doctor of Economics, had argued in 1940 for a “Central European Union” and “European Economic Area” and for fixed exchange rates - EMU in all but name. In this book, he wrote that “No nation in Europe can achieve on its own the highest level of economic freedom which is compatible with all social requirements…The formation of very large economic areas follows a natural law of development….interstate agreements in Europe will control [economic forces generally]…There must be a readiness to subordinate one’s own interests in certain cases to those of [the EC].”

One of his co-authors wrote that the “classic national economy..is dead…community of fate which is the European economy…fate and extent of European co-operation depends on a new unity economic plan”. Another observed that “We have a real European Community task before us…I am convinced that this Community effort will last beyond the end of the war.”

“Beyond the end of the war” explains everything. The principal author was Nazi Economics Minister and war criminal Walther Funk. In 1943, Walther Funk, Nazi Germany’s Minister for Economic Affairs and Head of the Reichsbank, outlined his ideas on the creation of a European economic area controlled by Nazi Germany in his book called “Walther Funk, The economic face of the new Europe”. The other two were respectively Nazi academic Heinrich Hunke and official Gustav Koenig. Nor were they just eccentrics. Goering’s orders in 1940 were followed by a project for the “large-scale economic unification of Europe” Goebbels, in the same year, compared Germany’s road to unification in the nineteenth century with Europe’s in the twentieth, believing that “in fifty years’ time [people] no longer think in terms of countries.”

On Remembrance Day remember the ultimate sacrifice paid by millions - not just military personnel, to stop Hitler from occupying Europe. How many lives were lost liberating the occupied countries of Europe? How many have spilled blood in the fight to restore the sovereignty of those countries? With the European Union, a Nazi ideology, in full control of the sovereign states of Europe, our grandfathers and our brothers have died in vain.

What Germany couldn’t achieve with war they did with the EU.

There is no need for a new global currency. We already have a global currency (the Federal Reserve Note) and the current global economic crisis has proven it doesn’t work. For decades the nations of the World has pegged their currency’s value against the privately owned counterfeit of the the United States Dollar. That counterfeit worthless piece of paper called the Federal Reserve Note is the root cause of the current US and World economic crisis. For decades the nations of the World allowed a small handful of private bankers to dictate the value of their currency and look where it has got them today. For decades the World has already been trading under a global currency - using the worthless counterfeits called the Federal Reserve Notes.

The simplest solution to the current economic crisis and to prevent another in the future is to stop using one nation’s currency for international trade. The solution is trade based on every country’s currency at parity (equal value) with every other country. That is to say that 1 US dollar would have the exact same value as 1 Canadian dollar or 1 Euro or 1 Yen or 1 Pound or … This eliminates one nation having superiority over other nations and eliminates any crisis that would arise should one country collapse as a result of debt, like the US. If every currency is at parity with each other confidence would remain uniform and strong.

Why should one country or an organization like the UN, the EU, the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank have control over the money of any other sovereign state? None have any authority over any country or each country’s people. Organizations like the UN, the WHO, the IMF, NATO and the EU should be banned. They are individuals who think that they can simply ignore the borders of each country, the sovereignty of each country and the economic prosperity of each country. They are all anti-Democratic. They are all anti-sovereignty.

During the Civil War (from 1861-1865), President Lincoln needed money to finance the War from the North. The Bankers were going to charge him 24% to 36% interest. Lincoln was horrified and went away greatly distressed, for he was a man of principle and would not think of plunging his beloved country into a debt that the country would find impossible to pay back.

Eventually President Lincoln was advised to get Congress to pass a law authorizing the printing of full legal tender Treasury notes to pay for the War effort. Lincoln recognized the great benefits of this issue. At one point hi wrote:

… (we) gave the people of this Republic the greatest blessing they have ever had - their own paper money to pay their own debts…

The Treasury notes were printed with green ink on the back, so the people called them “Greenbacks”.

Lincoln printed 400 million dollars worth of Greenbacks (the exact amount being $449,338,902), money that he delegated to be created, a bebt-free and interest-free money to finance the War. It served as legal tender for all debts, public and private. He printed it, paid it to the soldiers, to the U.S. Civil Service empoyees, and bought supplies for war.

Shortly after that happened, “The London Times” printed the following:

“if that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in th history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”

The Bankers obviously understood. The only thing that is a threat to their power is sovereign governments printing interest-free and debt-free paper money. They know it would break the power of the international Bankers.

After this was published in “The London Times”, the British Government, which was controlled by the London and other European Bankers, moved to support the Confederate South, hoping to defeat Lincoln and the Union, and destroy this government which they said had to be destroyed. But the North won the War, and the Union was preserved. America remained as one nation.

Of course, the Bankers were not going to give in that easy, for they were determined to put an end to Lincoln’s interest-free, debt-free Greenbacks. He was assassinated by an agent of the Bankers shortly after the War ended.

Thereafter, the Bankers controlled Congress revoked the Greenback Law and enacted, in its place, the National Banking Act. The national banks were to be privately owned (to this day they are still privately owned by the bankers of the Federal Reserve) and the national bank notes they issued were to be interest-bearing (to this day the privately owned Federal Reserve charges the United States people interest to print the worthless, illegal counterfeits called the Federal Reserve Notes). The Act also provided that the Greenbacks should be retired from circulation as soon as they came back to the Treasury in payment of taxes.

Former elected president of the United States, John F Kennedy, tried to warn the American people about this secretive organization that ruled the United States. He even tried to give the United States back to the people by abolishing the illegal Federal Reserve Act and taking the worthless counterfeit called the Federal Reserve Note out of circulation. Kennedy was assassinated for the same reason Lincoln was assassinated - for trying to get rid of the illegal Federal Reserve Banks and their illegal control of the United States money and bring back the legal interest free currency of the United States called the United States Dollar.

US Global Domination

How many know that the UN, the WHO, the IMF and NATO were all created by the United States? They were created as instruments for a US global domination of the World. They all were created by and are financed by the same bankers who illegally took control of the United States with the worthless interest bearing counterfeits called the Federal Reserve Note. The UN, the WHO, the IMF and NATO do whatever the US government (controlled by International bankers) tells them to do. They dictate US foreign policies. Every country that supports the UN, the WHO, the IMF and NATO are giving their political, territorial and economic sovereignty to the unelected shadow government of the United States. Not only should every country drop the worthless and illegal Federal Reserve Note as the main reserve currency but they should all withdraw their support for the UN, the WHO, the IMF, NATO and every organization that threatens their territorial, political and economic sovereignty - that includes the G8, G20 and the EU.

The World under economic slavery

Freedom from slavery is an internationally recognized human right. Article 4 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.” Economic slavery is what the UN, the IMF, the EU and the G20 have in mind for the World population - slavery is sought by these organizations as a legal institution or socio-economic system. The US is the perfect example of a government imposing a socio-economic slavery upon its citizens. The US government has been spending millions to brainwash the American people into believing that the US economic system is an exercise of free enterprise and that they are spending $trillions in support of free enterprise. That is totally false. The US abandoned free enterprise long ago in the aftermath of WW I in favor of Mussolini’s “corporatism,” i.e., economic fascism, where Big Business, Big Government, and Big Finance form combines to exploit the people with monopolized prices and a corrupted currency. Since Obama became the first non-American to become the president of the United States of America he has made economic fascism his presidential priority where Big Business, Big Government, and Big Finance have been formed to exploit the people with monopolized prices and a corrupted currency.

Fascism — a political philosophy, movement or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual, and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. (The state has power over every aspect of the economy to plan and regulate its workings. The factors of production are owned privately, but controlled by the gov­erning authorities as to what and how they are to produce, and what level of profits they are to retain.)

Capitalism — an economic system characterized by private or corpor­ate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by pri­vate decision rather than by state control, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market. (The state is neither to own nor operate the factors of production, nor to interfere in the peaceful decisions of their operation, leaving them to be controlled by the natural laws such as supply and demand that operate within the marketplace.)

Obviously the two systems are different in the fact that fascism advocates STATE control over the factors of production and their profits, while capitalism advocates PRIVATE control over those factors.

The primary distinction between the two systems is that capitalism is a system of economic organization without government involvement, thus its descriptive adjective of “laissez-faire,” which means to leave alone. The government’s job is basically to preserve the peace and perform those few limited functions granted by the Constitution.

Under fascism, the government’s job is to intervene into the marketplace to control all the various economic interactions of its participants. Its role is to manipulate the economic interactions through regulations and the conveyance of special privileges. Government assumes this power because it is felt that this is the only way stability and order can be maintained in society.

Under capitalism, the term “private” means free of government control or involvement. Thus, PRIVATE enterprise is FREE enterprise. Private businesses are entities in which the individual owners (rather than public officials) make the decisions of hiring, pricing, wage determination, production levels, policy planning, profit disposal, etc. Government is divorced from these economic decisions.

Under fascism, ownership of businesses are left in “private” hands, but the government rigidly regulates all businesses confiscating much of their profits and using them as the government sees fit. Thus business entities are private in name only. The term “private” is still used, but it no longer means free of government involvement. It is used within the context of government-business “cooperation.” However, such terminology is a fraud because there is never any cooperation when government is involved. Government simply tells businesses what it wants done and legally mandates that it be done. There is no choice in the matter. Those who don’t do as the government says are imprisoned or fined egregiously.

Fascism is thus a command economy where massive centralized government is developed to regulate its citizens’ lives. The major power centers of society — government, corporations, and banks — form a triad to monopolize and manipulate the economy according to their liking, their aggrandizement, and their profit at the expense of the individual and his rights.

“The essence of fascism,” writes Thomas J. DiLorenzo of Loyola College, “is that government should be the master, not the servant, of the people. Think about this. Does anyone in America really believe that this is not what we have now?

Look at the evidence. Since Obama became the de Facto president of the United States he has appointed czars to oversee new and complete State control over the American people. This appointing of czars is strictly prohibited by the Supreme Law of the United States of America - the US Constitution. These illegal actions by Obama are grounds for impeachment.

U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 2:

“.but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper,”

President Obama is appointing officials to his Executive Branch without conferring with the Senate. Here are some notables of his appointments as Czars:

Energy Czar: Carol M. Browner
Car Czar: Ed Montgomery
Health Care Czar: Nancy-Ann DeParle
Border Czar: Alan Bersin (Former US attorney).
Science Czar: John Holdren.
Green jobs Czar: Van Jones. - Admits being radicalized in jail. He has referred to himself as a communist and black nationalist. He said after the Rodney King riots he was a communist.

“It has taken President Barack Obama less than eight months to do what imperial Russia could not do in 400 years.”

Obama has appointed 31 “czars.” That’s more than ruled Russia during its entire imperial history. Originally, the title Czar (derived from Caesar) meant Emperor in the European medieval sense of the term, that is, a ruler who claims the same rank as a Roman emperor, with the approval of another emperor or a supreme ecclesiastical official. That would suggest that Obama claims to be the Emperor of the United States of America. The US Constitution strictly forbids Obama’s action - “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.” In the feudal system (in Europe and elsewhere), the nobility were generally those who held a fief, often land or office, under vassalage, i.e., in exchange for allegiance and various, mainly military, services to the Monarch.

kingofthe-US.jpg
Obama accepts a massive 18 karat gold chain necklace, from Saudi Arabia King Abdullah. The gold necklace is called the King Abdul Aziz Order of Merit, Saudi Arabia’s highest honor. “Those are only given to the very few friends of the king, and you are certainly one of those,” Abdullah said as he presented the thick chain and large medallion to Obama in an ornate meeting room with marble columns, engraved mirrors and a large chandelier. By accepting the highest honor bestowed by the King of Saudi Arabia, Obama has accepted the title of nobility in exchange for allegiances and various, mainly military, services to the Saudi Monarch. Obama illegally accepted a nobility title from the country that attacked the United States on September 11, 2001. The country that provided the majority if hijackers that carried out the attack against the US. The country of birth for bin Laden - the officially stated target for the United States unprovoked war of aggression against the sovereign foreign state of Afghanistan and its people.

In 1787 Doctor Benjamin Franklin was asked on the last day of the Constitutional Convention, while exiting the building: “Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”

Dr. Franklin answered: “A Republic, if you can keep it.”